Implant‐supported prosthesis following Brånemark protocol on electromyography of masticatory muscles
Identifieur interne : 006246 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006245; suivant : 006247Implant‐supported prosthesis following Brånemark protocol on electromyography of masticatory muscles
Auteurs : E. Bersani ; S. C. H. Regalo ; S. Siéssere ; C. M. Santos ; D. T. Chimello ; R. H. De Oliveira ; M. SempriniSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2011-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Blackwell publishing, Branemark, Branemark protocol, Clinical conditions, Complete dentures, Dentate, Dentate individuals, Denture, Electromyographic, Electromyography, Implant, Laterality, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Mandibular prosthesis, Masseter, Masseter muscle, Masseter muscles, Masticatory, Masticatory function, Masticatory muscles, Maxillary, Method error, Muscle activity, Natural dentition, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Overdentures, Postural, Present study, Prosthesis, Protocol, Protrusion, Rehabil, Ribeirao preto, Right masseter, Temporal muscle, Temporal muscles.
- Teeft :
- Blackwell publishing, Branemark, Branemark protocol, Clinical conditions, Complete dentures, Dentate, Dentate individuals, Denture, Electromyographic, Electromyography, Implant, Laterality, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Mandibular prosthesis, Masseter, Masseter muscle, Masseter muscles, Masticatory, Masticatory function, Masticatory muscles, Maxillary, Method error, Muscle activity, Natural dentition, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Overdentures, Postural, Present study, Prosthesis, Protocol, Protrusion, Rehabil, Ribeirao preto, Right masseter, Temporal muscle, Temporal muscles.
Abstract
Summary This research evaluated the effects of Brånemark protocol on electromyography of the masseter and temporal muscles. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I: patients who wore an implant‐supported prosthesis in the mandibular arch following Brånemark protocol, and maxillary removable complete dentures; Group II: dentate individuals (control). Electromyography was carried out at rest, right (RL) and left (LL) laterality, protrusion and maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Data were compared by t‐test. At rest, a higher electromyographic (EMG) activity was observed in Group I, and the values were significant in the right masseter and left temporal muscles. In RL, there were statistically significant differences for right masseter (P < 0·01), left masseter and temporal muscles and for the left temporal muscle in LL (P < 0·05). In protrusion, Group I presented a higher EMG activity, and there was a statistically significant difference for the right masseter muscle (RM) (P < 0·05). In MVC, the EMG values were higher in Group II (control), but significant just for the right temporal muscle (P < 0·05). In conclusion, individuals with mandibular fixed dentures supported according to the Brånemark protocol and maxillary removable complete dentures showed a higher activity of masticatory muscles during the mandibular postural clinical conditions examined; however, in the MVC, Group I presented lower values when compared to dentate group. Despite presenting different EMG values in all of the clinical conditions, both groups showed similar EMG patterns of muscle activation which demonstrates that the proposed treatment can be considered as a good option for oral rehabilitation.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02201.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:C63D9A308873737CE4A9595E9361E79A2741A8FFLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant‐supported prosthesis following Brånemark protocol on electromyography of masticatory muscles</title><author><name sortKey="Bersani, E" sort="Bersani, E" uniqKey="Bersani E" first="E." last="Bersani">E. Bersani</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Regalo, S C H" sort="Regalo, S C H" uniqKey="Regalo S" first="S. C. H." last="Regalo">S. C. H. Regalo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Siessere, S" sort="Siessere, S" uniqKey="Siessere S" first="S." last="Siéssere">S. Siéssere</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Santos, C M" sort="Santos, C M" uniqKey="Santos C" first="C. M." last="Santos">C. M. Santos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chimello, D T" sort="Chimello, D T" uniqKey="Chimello D" first="D. T." last="Chimello">D. T. Chimello</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Oliveira, R H" sort="De Oliveira, R H" uniqKey="De Oliveira R" first="R. H." last="De Oliveira">R. H. De Oliveira</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Semprini, M" sort="Semprini, M" uniqKey="Semprini M" first="M." last="Semprini">M. Semprini</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C63D9A308873737CE4A9595E9361E79A2741A8FF</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02201.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C63D9A308873737CE4A9595E9361E79A2741A8FF/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006246</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006246</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implant‐supported prosthesis following Brånemark protocol on electromyography of masticatory muscles</title><author><name sortKey="Bersani, E" sort="Bersani, E" uniqKey="Bersani E" first="E." last="Bersani">E. Bersani</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Regalo, S C H" sort="Regalo, S C H" uniqKey="Regalo S" first="S. C. H." last="Regalo">S. C. H. Regalo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Siessere, S" sort="Siessere, S" uniqKey="Siessere S" first="S." last="Siéssere">S. Siéssere</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Santos, C M" sort="Santos, C M" uniqKey="Santos C" first="C. M." last="Santos">C. M. Santos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chimello, D T" sort="Chimello, D T" uniqKey="Chimello D" first="D. T." last="Chimello">D. T. Chimello</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Oliveira, R H" sort="De Oliveira, R H" uniqKey="De Oliveira R" first="R. H." last="De Oliveira">R. H. De Oliveira</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Semprini, M" sort="Semprini, M" uniqKey="Semprini M" first="M." last="Semprini">M. Semprini</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">38</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="668">668</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="673">673</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09">2011-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark protocol</term><term>Clinical conditions</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate individuals</term><term>Denture</term><term>Electromyographic</term><term>Electromyography</term><term>Implant</term><term>Laterality</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Mandibular prosthesis</term><term>Masseter</term><term>Masseter muscle</term><term>Masseter muscles</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Masticatory muscles</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Method error</term><term>Muscle activity</term><term>Natural dentition</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Postural</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Protocol</term><term>Protrusion</term><term>Rehabil</term><term>Ribeirao preto</term><term>Right masseter</term><term>Temporal muscle</term><term>Temporal muscles</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark protocol</term><term>Clinical conditions</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate individuals</term><term>Denture</term><term>Electromyographic</term><term>Electromyography</term><term>Implant</term><term>Laterality</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Mandibular prosthesis</term><term>Masseter</term><term>Masseter muscle</term><term>Masseter muscles</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Masticatory muscles</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Method error</term><term>Muscle activity</term><term>Natural dentition</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Postural</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Protocol</term><term>Protrusion</term><term>Rehabil</term><term>Ribeirao preto</term><term>Right masseter</term><term>Temporal muscle</term><term>Temporal muscles</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Summary This research evaluated the effects of Brånemark protocol on electromyography of the masseter and temporal muscles. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I: patients who wore an implant‐supported prosthesis in the mandibular arch following Brånemark protocol, and maxillary removable complete dentures; Group II: dentate individuals (control). Electromyography was carried out at rest, right (RL) and left (LL) laterality, protrusion and maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Data were compared by t‐test. At rest, a higher electromyographic (EMG) activity was observed in Group I, and the values were significant in the right masseter and left temporal muscles. In RL, there were statistically significant differences for right masseter (P < 0·01), left masseter and temporal muscles and for the left temporal muscle in LL (P < 0·05). In protrusion, Group I presented a higher EMG activity, and there was a statistically significant difference for the right masseter muscle (RM) (P < 0·05). In MVC, the EMG values were higher in Group II (control), but significant just for the right temporal muscle (P < 0·05). In conclusion, individuals with mandibular fixed dentures supported according to the Brånemark protocol and maxillary removable complete dentures showed a higher activity of masticatory muscles during the mandibular postural clinical conditions examined; however, in the MVC, Group I presented lower values when compared to dentate group. Despite presenting different EMG values in all of the clinical conditions, both groups showed similar EMG patterns of muscle activation which demonstrates that the proposed treatment can be considered as a good option for oral rehabilitation.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>masticatory</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>dentate</json:string><json:string>branemark protocol</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>masseter</json:string><json:string>dentate individuals</json:string><json:string>masticatory muscles</json:string><json:string>postural</json:string><json:string>oral rehabil</json:string><json:string>rehabil</json:string><json:string>temporal muscles</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>laterality</json:string><json:string>electromyographic</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string><json:string>electromyography</json:string><json:string>protrusion</json:string><json:string>temporal muscle</json:string><json:string>protocol</json:string><json:string>clinical conditions</json:string><json:string>masticatory function</json:string><json:string>ribeirao preto</json:string><json:string>natural dentition</json:string><json:string>masseter muscles</json:string><json:string>method error</json:string><json:string>mandibular prosthesis</json:string><json:string>muscle activity</json:string><json:string>masseter muscle</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>right masseter</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>E. BERSANI</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>S. C. H. REGALO</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>S. SIÉSSERE</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>C. M. SANTOS</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>D. T. CHIMELLO</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>R. H. De OLIVEIRA</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. SEMPRINI</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Brånemark protocol</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>electromyography</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐supported prosthesis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>masticatory muscles</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOOR2201</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-H1LDLWKB-0</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Summary This research evaluated the effects of Brånemark protocol on electromyography of the masseter and temporal muscles. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I: patients who wore an implant‐supported prosthesis in the mandibular arch following Brånemark protocol, and maxillary removable complete dentures; Group II: dentate individuals (control). Electromyography was carried out at rest, right (RL) and left (LL) laterality, protrusion and maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Data were compared by t‐test. At rest, a higher electromyographic (EMG) activity was observed in Group I, and the values were significant in the right masseter and left temporal muscles. In RL, there were statistically significant differences for right masseter (P > 0·01), left masseter and temporal muscles and for the left temporal muscle in LL (P > 0·05). In protrusion, Group I presented a higher EMG activity, and there was a statistically significant difference for the right masseter muscle (RM) (P > 0·05). In MVC, the EMG values were higher in Group II (control), but significant just for the right temporal muscle (P > 0·05). In conclusion, individuals with mandibular fixed dentures supported according to the Brånemark protocol and maxillary removable complete dentures showed a higher activity of masticatory muscles during the mandibular postural clinical conditions examined; however, in the MVC, Group I presented lower values when compared to dentate group. Despite presenting different EMG values in all of the clinical conditions, both groups showed similar EMG patterns of muscle activation which demonstrates that the proposed treatment can be considered as a good option for oral rehabilitation.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.066</score><pdfWordCount>3102</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>20543</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>247</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1713</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Implant‐supported prosthesis following Brånemark protocol on electromyography of masticatory muscles</title><pmid><json:string>21294764</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>38</volume><issue>9</issue><pages><first>668</first><last>673</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2011</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>National Health Council</json:string><json:string>Latin America Institute of Research on Dentistry</json:string><json:string>University of Sao Paulo</json:string><json:string>ILAPEO</json:string><json:string>Ethics Committee of the Ribeirao Preto School of Dentistry</json:string><json:string>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Geninho Thome</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Brazil</json:string><json:string>Curitiba</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Pinho et al.</json:string><json:string>Santos et al.</json:string><json:string>Cram et al.</json:string><json:string>Liu et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-H1LDLWKB-0</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02201.x</json:string></doi><id>C63D9A308873737CE4A9595E9361E79A2741A8FF</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C63D9A308873737CE4A9595E9361E79A2741A8FF/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C63D9A308873737CE4A9595E9361E79A2741A8FF/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/C63D9A308873737CE4A9595E9361E79A2741A8FF/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Implant‐supported prosthesis following Brånemark protocol on electromyography of masticatory muscles</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2011-09"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implant‐supported prosthesis following Brånemark protocol on electromyography of masticatory muscles</title><title level="a" type="short">BRÅNEMARK PROTOCOL AND MASTICATORY MUSCLES</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">E.</forename><surname>BERSANI</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">S. C. H.</forename><surname>REGALO</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">S.</forename><surname>SIÉSSERE</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">C. M.</forename><surname>SANTOS</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">D. T.</forename><surname>CHIMELLO</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">R. H.</forename><surname>
De OLIVEIRA</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0006"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>SEMPRINI</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">C63D9A308873737CE4A9595E9361E79A2741A8FF</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-H1LDLWKB-0</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02201.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR2201</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR2201.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jor.2011.38.issue-9</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">38</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="668">668</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="673">673</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Summary </hi> This research evaluated the effects of Brånemark protocol on electromyography of the masseter and temporal muscles. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I: patients who wore an implant‐supported prosthesis in the mandibular arch following Brånemark protocol, and maxillary removable complete dentures; Group II: dentate individuals (control). Electromyography was carried out at rest, right (RL) and left (LL) laterality, protrusion and maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Data were compared by <hi rend="italic">t</hi>‐test. At rest, a higher electromyographic (EMG) activity was observed in Group I, and the values were significant in the right masseter and left temporal muscles. In RL, there were statistically significant differences for right masseter (<hi rend="italic">P </hi><<hi rend="italic"> </hi>0·01), left masseter and temporal muscles and for the left temporal muscle in LL (<hi rend="italic">P </hi><<hi rend="italic"> </hi>0·05). In protrusion, Group I presented a higher EMG activity, and there was a statistically significant difference for the right masseter muscle (RM) (<hi rend="italic">P </hi><<hi rend="italic"> </hi>0·05). In MVC, the EMG values were higher in Group II (control), but significant just for the right temporal muscle (<hi rend="italic">P </hi><<hi rend="italic"> </hi>0·05). In conclusion, individuals with mandibular fixed dentures supported according to the Brånemark protocol and maxillary removable complete dentures showed a higher activity of masticatory muscles during the mandibular postural clinical conditions examined; however, in the MVC, Group I presented lower values when compared to dentate group. Despite presenting different EMG values in all of the clinical conditions, both groups showed similar EMG patterns of muscle activation which demonstrates that the proposed treatment can be considered as a good option for oral rehabilitation.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">Brånemark protocol</term><term xml:id="k2">electromyography</term><term xml:id="k3">implant‐supported prosthesis</term><term xml:id="k4">masticatory muscles</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C63D9A308873737CE4A9595E9361E79A2741A8FF/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09109"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jor.2011.38.issue-9</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="38">38</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="9">9</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-09">September 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="6" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02201.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR2201"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.5.2 mode:FullText" date="2011-08-08"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-02-05"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-02-05"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-08-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="668">668</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="673">673</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Simone Cecílio Hallak Regalo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Morfologia, Estomatologia e Fisiologia, Avenida do Café, s/n, Monte Alegre, CEP 14040‐904, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil. E‐mail: <email>schregalo@forp.usp.br</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR2201.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 23 December 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Implant‐supported prosthesis following Brånemark protocol on electromyography of masticatory muscles</title><title type="shortAuthors">E. BERSANI <i>et al.</i></title><title type="short">BRÅNEMARK PROTOCOL AND MASTICATORY MUSCLES</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>E.</givenNames><familyName>BERSANI</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>S. C. H.</givenNames><familyName>REGALO</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>S.</givenNames><familyName>SIÉSSERE</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>C. M.</givenNames><familyName>SANTOS</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>D. T.</givenNames><familyName>CHIMELLO</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>R. H.</givenNames><familyName>
De OLIVEIRA</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr7" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames><familyName>SEMPRINI</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Brånemark protocol</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">electromyography</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">implant‐supported prosthesis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">masticatory muscles</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Summary </b> This research evaluated the effects of Brånemark protocol on electromyography of the masseter and temporal muscles. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I: patients who wore an implant‐supported prosthesis in the mandibular arch following Brånemark protocol, and maxillary removable complete dentures; Group II: dentate individuals (control). Electromyography was carried out at rest, right (RL) and left (LL) laterality, protrusion and maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Data were compared by <i>t</i>‐test. At rest, a higher electromyographic (EMG) activity was observed in Group I, and the values were significant in the right masseter and left temporal muscles. In RL, there were statistically significant differences for right masseter (<i>P </i><<i> </i>0·01), left masseter and temporal muscles and for the left temporal muscle in LL (<i>P </i><<i> </i>0·05). In protrusion, Group I presented a higher EMG activity, and there was a statistically significant difference for the right masseter muscle (RM) (<i>P </i><<i> </i>0·05). In MVC, the EMG values were higher in Group II (control), but significant just for the right temporal muscle (<i>P </i><<i> </i>0·05). In conclusion, individuals with mandibular fixed dentures supported according to the Brånemark protocol and maxillary removable complete dentures showed a higher activity of masticatory muscles during the mandibular postural clinical conditions examined; however, in the MVC, Group I presented lower values when compared to dentate group. Despite presenting different EMG values in all of the clinical conditions, both groups showed similar EMG patterns of muscle activation which demonstrates that the proposed treatment can be considered as a good option for oral rehabilitation.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Implant‐supported prosthesis following Brånemark protocol on electromyography of masticatory muscles</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>BRÅNEMARK PROTOCOL AND MASTICATORY MUSCLES</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Implant‐supported prosthesis following Brånemark protocol on electromyography of masticatory muscles</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">E.</namePart><namePart type="family">BERSANI</namePart><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">S. C. H.</namePart><namePart type="family">REGALO</namePart><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">S.</namePart><namePart type="family">SIÉSSERE</namePart><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C. M.</namePart><namePart type="family">SANTOS</namePart><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D. T.</namePart><namePart type="family">CHIMELLO</namePart><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R. H.</namePart><namePart type="family">De OLIVEIRA</namePart><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">SEMPRINI</namePart><affiliation>Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-09</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 23 December 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Summary This research evaluated the effects of Brånemark protocol on electromyography of the masseter and temporal muscles. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I: patients who wore an implant‐supported prosthesis in the mandibular arch following Brånemark protocol, and maxillary removable complete dentures; Group II: dentate individuals (control). Electromyography was carried out at rest, right (RL) and left (LL) laterality, protrusion and maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Data were compared by t‐test. At rest, a higher electromyographic (EMG) activity was observed in Group I, and the values were significant in the right masseter and left temporal muscles. In RL, there were statistically significant differences for right masseter (P < 0·01), left masseter and temporal muscles and for the left temporal muscle in LL (P < 0·05). In protrusion, Group I presented a higher EMG activity, and there was a statistically significant difference for the right masseter muscle (RM) (P < 0·05). In MVC, the EMG values were higher in Group II (control), but significant just for the right temporal muscle (P < 0·05). In conclusion, individuals with mandibular fixed dentures supported according to the Brånemark protocol and maxillary removable complete dentures showed a higher activity of masticatory muscles during the mandibular postural clinical conditions examined; however, in the MVC, Group I presented lower values when compared to dentate group. Despite presenting different EMG values in all of the clinical conditions, both groups showed similar EMG patterns of muscle activation which demonstrates that the proposed treatment can be considered as a good option for oral rehabilitation.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Brånemark protocol</topic><topic>electromyography</topic><topic>implant‐supported prosthesis</topic><topic>masticatory muscles</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>38</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>9</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>668</start><end>673</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">C63D9A308873737CE4A9595E9361E79A2741A8FF</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-H1LDLWKB-0</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02201.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR2201</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C63D9A308873737CE4A9595E9361E79A2741A8FF/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006246 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006246 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C63D9A308873737CE4A9595E9361E79A2741A8FF
|texte= Implant‐supported prosthesis following Brånemark protocol on electromyography of masticatory muscles
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |