Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment around Single Implants in Healed Ridges and Extraction Sockets Using Cone Beam CT
Identifieur interne : 006064 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006063; suivant : 006065Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment around Single Implants in Healed Ridges and Extraction Sockets Using Cone Beam CT
Auteurs : Filiep Raes ; Liesbet Renckens ; Johan Aps ; Jan Cosyn ; Hugo De BruynSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2013-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Artifact, Astra tech, Bone level, Buccal, Buccal bone, Cbct, Cbct data, Cbct images, Cbct measurements, Circumferential, Circumferential bone level, Circumferential bone level assessment, Circumferential measurements, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Cone beam, Dent, Dental implants, Dental school, Dentistry, Dentomaxillofac, Dentomaxillofac radiol, Effective dose, Extraction sockets, Ghent, Health sciences, Icrp, Icrp publication, Image quality, Imaging, Implant, Implant therapy, Inspektor research systems, Interexaminer, Interexaminer reliability, International commission, Interproximal, Interproximal bone level, Intra, Long axis, Marginal bone level, Maxillofacial radiology, Mesial, Oral implantology, Oral pathol, Oral surg, Periapical, Periapical radiograph, Periapical radiographs, Periodontol, Present study, Radiation dose, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiol, Radiol endod, Reliability, Single implants, Standard deviation, Tomography, Treatment strategy.
- Teeft :
- Artifact, Astra tech, Bone level, Buccal, Buccal bone, Cbct, Cbct data, Cbct images, Cbct measurements, Circumferential, Circumferential bone level, Circumferential bone level assessment, Circumferential measurements, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Cone beam, Dent, Dental implants, Dental school, Dentistry, Dentomaxillofac, Dentomaxillofac radiol, Effective dose, Extraction sockets, Ghent, Health sciences, Icrp, Icrp publication, Image quality, Imaging, Implant, Implant therapy, Inspektor research systems, Interexaminer, Interexaminer reliability, International commission, Interproximal, Interproximal bone level, Intra, Long axis, Marginal bone level, Maxillofacial radiology, Mesial, Oral implantology, Oral pathol, Oral surg, Periapical, Periapical radiograph, Periapical radiographs, Periodontol, Present study, Radiation dose, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiol, Radiol endod, Reliability, Single implants, Standard deviation, Tomography, Treatment strategy.
Abstract
Purpose: Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) provides three‐dimensional information and could absolutely be useful for evaluating circumferential implant bone levels. However, the accuracy and precision of the technique has not been described. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy and precision of CBCT (i‐CAT®, Imaging Sciences International®, Hatfield, PA, USA) using periapical radiographs (PA) as a reference and to evaluate the circumferential bone level on CBCT around immediately loaded single implants placed in healed ridges (CIT, conventional implant treatment) and extraction sockets (IIT, immediate implant placement).
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00393.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:C2688CC0DD14C7F8EC983361706904504B7ABB66Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment around Single Implants in Healed Ridges and Extraction Sockets Using Cone Beam CT</title><author><name sortKey="Raes, Filiep" sort="Raes, Filiep" uniqKey="Raes F" first="Filiep" last="Raes">Filiep Raes</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical assistant, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Renckens, Liesbet" sort="Renckens, Liesbet" uniqKey="Renckens L" first="Liesbet" last="Renckens">Liesbet Renckens</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>clinical assistant, Dental School, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aps, Johan" sort="Aps, Johan" uniqKey="Aps J" first="Johan" last="Aps">Johan Aps</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>head of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Ghent University Hospital</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>visiting professor at Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cosyn, Jan" sort="Cosyn, Jan" uniqKey="Cosyn J" first="Jan" last="Cosyn">Jan Cosyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>¶professor, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>visiting professor, Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>chairman and professor, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>visiting professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C2688CC0DD14C7F8EC983361706904504B7ABB66</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00393.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C2688CC0DD14C7F8EC983361706904504B7ABB66/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006064</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006064</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment around Single Implants in Healed Ridges and Extraction Sockets Using Cone Beam CT</title><author><name sortKey="Raes, Filiep" sort="Raes, Filiep" uniqKey="Raes F" first="Filiep" last="Raes">Filiep Raes</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical assistant, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Renckens, Liesbet" sort="Renckens, Liesbet" uniqKey="Renckens L" first="Liesbet" last="Renckens">Liesbet Renckens</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>clinical assistant, Dental School, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aps, Johan" sort="Aps, Johan" uniqKey="Aps J" first="Johan" last="Aps">Johan Aps</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>head of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Ghent University Hospital</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>visiting professor at Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cosyn, Jan" sort="Cosyn, Jan" uniqKey="Cosyn J" first="Jan" last="Cosyn">Jan Cosyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>¶professor, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>visiting professor, Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>chairman and professor, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>visiting professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="661">661</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="672">672</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-10">2013-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Artifact</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Buccal</term><term>Buccal bone</term><term>Cbct</term><term>Cbct data</term><term>Cbct images</term><term>Cbct measurements</term><term>Circumferential</term><term>Circumferential bone level</term><term>Circumferential bone level assessment</term><term>Circumferential measurements</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Cone beam</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentomaxillofac</term><term>Dentomaxillofac radiol</term><term>Effective dose</term><term>Extraction sockets</term><term>Ghent</term><term>Health sciences</term><term>Icrp</term><term>Icrp publication</term><term>Image quality</term><term>Imaging</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Inspektor research systems</term><term>Interexaminer</term><term>Interexaminer reliability</term><term>International commission</term><term>Interproximal</term><term>Interproximal bone level</term><term>Intra</term><term>Long axis</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Maxillofacial radiology</term><term>Mesial</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral pathol</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Periapical</term><term>Periapical radiograph</term><term>Periapical radiographs</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Present study</term><term>Radiation dose</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiol</term><term>Radiol endod</term><term>Reliability</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Tomography</term><term>Treatment strategy</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Artifact</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Buccal</term><term>Buccal bone</term><term>Cbct</term><term>Cbct data</term><term>Cbct images</term><term>Cbct measurements</term><term>Circumferential</term><term>Circumferential bone level</term><term>Circumferential bone level assessment</term><term>Circumferential measurements</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Cone beam</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentomaxillofac</term><term>Dentomaxillofac radiol</term><term>Effective dose</term><term>Extraction sockets</term><term>Ghent</term><term>Health sciences</term><term>Icrp</term><term>Icrp publication</term><term>Image quality</term><term>Imaging</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Inspektor research systems</term><term>Interexaminer</term><term>Interexaminer reliability</term><term>International commission</term><term>Interproximal</term><term>Interproximal bone level</term><term>Intra</term><term>Long axis</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Maxillofacial radiology</term><term>Mesial</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral pathol</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Periapical</term><term>Periapical radiograph</term><term>Periapical radiographs</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Present study</term><term>Radiation dose</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiol</term><term>Radiol endod</term><term>Reliability</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Tomography</term><term>Treatment strategy</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Purpose: Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) provides three‐dimensional information and could absolutely be useful for evaluating circumferential implant bone levels. However, the accuracy and precision of the technique has not been described. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy and precision of CBCT (i‐CAT®, Imaging Sciences International®, Hatfield, PA, USA) using periapical radiographs (PA) as a reference and to evaluate the circumferential bone level on CBCT around immediately loaded single implants placed in healed ridges (CIT, conventional implant treatment) and extraction sockets (IIT, immediate implant placement).</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>cbct</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>tomography</json:string><json:string>circumferential</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>cone beam</json:string><json:string>circumferential bone level</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>radiol</json:string><json:string>mesial</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>periapical</json:string><json:string>buccal</json:string><json:string>interproximal</json:string><json:string>interexaminer</json:string><json:string>treatment strategy</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>ghent</json:string><json:string>icrp</json:string><json:string>extraction sockets</json:string><json:string>artifact</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>periodontol</json:string><json:string>dentomaxillofac radiol</json:string><json:string>dentomaxillofac</json:string><json:string>cbct images</json:string><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>circumferential bone level assessment</json:string><json:string>oral surg</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>radiol endod</json:string><json:string>radiation dose</json:string><json:string>oral pathol</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>effective dose</json:string><json:string>intra</json:string><json:string>implant therapy</json:string><json:string>oral implantology</json:string><json:string>dental school</json:string><json:string>interproximal bone level</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>cbct data</json:string><json:string>periapical radiographs</json:string><json:string>reliability</json:string><json:string>imaging</json:string><json:string>buccal bone</json:string><json:string>international commission</json:string><json:string>image quality</json:string><json:string>circumferential measurements</json:string><json:string>long axis</json:string><json:string>inspektor research systems</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial radiology</json:string><json:string>single implants</json:string><json:string>periapical radiograph</json:string><json:string>cbct measurements</json:string><json:string>interexaminer reliability</json:string><json:string>standard deviation</json:string><json:string>astra tech</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>icrp publication</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Filiep Raes DDS, MSc</name><affiliations><json:string>Clinical assistant, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Liesbet Renckens DDS, Msc</name><affiliations><json:string>clinical assistant, Dental School, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Johan Aps DDS, MSc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>head of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Ghent University Hospital</json:string><json:string>visiting professor at Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jan Cosyn DDS, MSc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>¶professor, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</json:string><json:string>visiting professor, Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Hugo De Bruyn DDS, Msc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>chairman and professor, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</json:string><json:string>visiting professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden</json:string><json:string>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>accuracy and precision</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>circumferential bone level</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cone beam CT</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>single implant</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID393</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-S6Q68TRC-P</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Purpose: Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) provides three‐dimensional information and could absolutely be useful for evaluating circumferential implant bone levels. However, the accuracy and precision of the technique has not been described. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy and precision of CBCT (i‐CAT®, Imaging Sciences International®, Hatfield, PA, USA) using periapical radiographs (PA) as a reference and to evaluate the circumferential bone level on CBCT around immediately loaded single implants placed in healed ridges (CIT, conventional implant treatment) and extraction sockets (IIT, immediate implant placement).</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.068</score><pdfWordCount>5630</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>35854</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>89</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>646</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment around Single Implants in Healed Ridges and Extraction Sockets Using Cone Beam CT</title><pmid><json:string>22008055</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>661</first><last>672</last><total>12</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1975</json:string><json:string>2013</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Free University</json:string><json:string>Imaging Sciences International</json:string><json:string>Ghent University</json:string><json:string>ICRP</json:string><json:string>Inspektor Research Systems BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Oral</json:string><json:string>University Hospital of Ghent</json:string><json:string>University of Ghent</json:string><json:string>Department of Radiology, AZ St</json:string><json:string>International Commission on Radiological Protection</json:string><json:string>UNSCEAR</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, University of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden Reprint</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Results</json:string><json:string>Jan Cosyn</json:string><json:string>Selection</json:string><json:string>Gröndahl</json:string><json:string>Hugo De Bruyn</json:string><json:string>Cardaropoli</json:string><json:string>Jan Casselman</json:string><json:string>Ballrick</json:string><json:string>Elbert de Josselin</json:string><json:string>Grimard</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Ghent</json:string><json:string>Helsinki</json:string><json:string>Japan</json:string><json:string>Brussels</json:string><json:string>Bruges</json:string><json:string>Tokyo</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-S6Q68TRC-P</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00393.x</json:string></doi><id>C2688CC0DD14C7F8EC983361706904504B7ABB66</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C2688CC0DD14C7F8EC983361706904504B7ABB66/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C2688CC0DD14C7F8EC983361706904504B7ABB66/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/C2688CC0DD14C7F8EC983361706904504B7ABB66/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment around Single Implants in Healed Ridges and Extraction Sockets Using Cone Beam CT</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment around Single Implants in Healed Ridges and Extraction Sockets Using Cone Beam CT</title><title level="a" type="short">Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Filiep</forename><surname>Raes</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc</roleName></persName><affiliation>Clinical assistant, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Liesbet</forename><surname>Renckens</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, Msc</roleName></persName><affiliation>clinical assistant, Dental School, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Johan</forename><surname>Aps</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>head of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Ghent University Hospital</affiliation><affiliation>visiting professor at Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Jan</forename><surname>Cosyn</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>professor, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>visiting professor, Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Hugo</forename><surname>De Bruyn</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, Msc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>chairman and professor, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>visiting professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr. Hugo De Bruyn, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185 P8, B‐9000 Ghent, Belgium; e‐mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">C2688CC0DD14C7F8EC983361706904504B7ABB66</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-S6Q68TRC-P</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00393.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID393</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID393.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2013.15.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="661">661</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="672">672</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) provides three‐dimensional information and could absolutely be useful for evaluating circumferential implant bone levels. However, the accuracy and precision of the technique has not been described. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy and precision of CBCT (i‐CAT®, Imaging Sciences International®, Hatfield, PA, USA) using periapical radiographs (PA) as a reference and to evaluate the circumferential bone level on CBCT around immediately loaded single implants placed in healed ridges (CIT, conventional implant treatment) and extraction sockets (IIT, immediate implant placement).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> PA and CBCT radiographs were obtained from 26 single Astra Tech Osseospeed™ implants (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) 1 year after loading in respectively healed ridges (CIT) or extraction socket (IIT). For accuracy analysis, the three mesial and three distal interproximal levels obtained by CBCT were pooled to enable a comparison with PA. Precision was analyzed by intra‐ and interexaminer reliability calculation from mesial and distal sites on CBCT. The circumferential bone level considered all eight positions assessed on CBCT.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> Accuracy of CBCT was low (R = 0.325/<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .019) given the fact that bone level of the total group was 0.70 mm (standard deviation [SD] 0.78, range 0.00–3.20) on PA and 0.23 mm (SD 0.27, 0.00–1.20) on CBCT (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .001) with only 42% of the measurements showing deviation within 0.2 mm. However, intra‐ and interexaminer reliability were favorable (R ≥ 0.611/<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .001, ≥83%). The mean circumferential bone level on CBCT was 0.21 mm (SD 0.30) and 0.26 mm (SD 0.18) for IIT and CIT, respectively. The impact of the treatment strategy was not significant.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi> PA should be the standard technique to assess interproximal bone level but correlates poorly with the CBCT measurements. However, the precision of CBCT was high. CBCT requires further improvements of hardware and/or software. Within the limitations of the study, there is an indication that the buccal bone 1 year after implant treatment is evenly preserved when implants are immediately loaded in extraction sockets or in healed bone.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">accuracy and precision</term><term xml:id="k2">circumferential bone level</term><term xml:id="k3">cone beam CT</term><term xml:id="k4">single implant</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Article</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C2688CC0DD14C7F8EC983361706904504B7ABB66/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10105"><doi>10.1111/cid.2013.15.issue-5</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="15" type="journalVolume">15</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-10">October 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="50" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00393.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID393"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title><title type="articleCategory">Article</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.2.5 mode:FullText" date="2013-09-26"></event><event date="2013-09-27" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-10-18"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-10-18"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-10-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-02"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">661</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">672</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr. Hugo De Bruyn, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185 P8, B‐9000 Ghent, Belgium; e‐mail: <email>hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID393.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="5"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="65"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6229"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment around Single Implants in Healed Ridges and Extraction Sockets Using Cone Beam CT</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2011</title><title type="short">Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Filiep</givenNames><familyName>Raes</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Liesbet</givenNames><familyName>Renckens</familyName><degrees>DDS, Msc</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3 #a4"><personName><givenNames>Johan</givenNames><familyName>Aps</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a5 #a6"><personName><givenNames>Jan</givenNames><familyName>Cosyn</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a7 #a8" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Hugo</givenNames><familyName>De Bruyn</familyName><degrees>DDS, Msc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Clinical assistant, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>clinical assistant, Dental School, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3"><unparsedAffiliation>head of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Ghent University Hospital</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>visiting professor at Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation><sup>¶</sup>professor, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a6" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>visiting professor, Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a7" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>chairman and professor, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a8" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>visiting professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">accuracy and precision</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">circumferential bone level</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">cone beam CT</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">single implant</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>AstraTech AB</fundingAgency></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Purpose:</b> Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) provides three‐dimensional information and could absolutely be useful for evaluating circumferential implant bone levels. However, the accuracy and precision of the technique has not been described. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy and precision of CBCT (i‐CAT®, Imaging Sciences International®, Hatfield, PA, USA) using periapical radiographs (PA) as a reference and to evaluate the circumferential bone level on CBCT around immediately loaded single implants placed in healed ridges (CIT, conventional implant treatment) and extraction sockets (IIT, immediate implant placement).</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> PA and CBCT radiographs were obtained from 26 single Astra Tech Osseospeed™ implants (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) 1 year after loading in respectively healed ridges (CIT) or extraction socket (IIT). For accuracy analysis, the three mesial and three distal interproximal levels obtained by CBCT were pooled to enable a comparison with PA. Precision was analyzed by intra‐ and interexaminer reliability calculation from mesial and distal sites on CBCT. The circumferential bone level considered all eight positions assessed on CBCT.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Accuracy of CBCT was low (R = 0.325/<i>p</i> = .019) given the fact that bone level of the total group was 0.70 mm (standard deviation [SD] 0.78, range 0.00–3.20) on PA and 0.23 mm (SD 0.27, 0.00–1.20) on CBCT (<i>p</i> < .001) with only 42% of the measurements showing deviation within 0.2 mm. However, intra‐ and interexaminer reliability were favorable (R ≥ 0.611/<i>p</i> < .001, ≥83%). The mean circumferential bone level on CBCT was 0.21 mm (SD 0.30) and 0.26 mm (SD 0.18) for IIT and CIT, respectively. The impact of the treatment strategy was not significant.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> PA should be the standard technique to assess interproximal bone level but correlates poorly with the CBCT measurements. However, the precision of CBCT was high. CBCT requires further improvements of hardware and/or software. Within the limitations of the study, there is an indication that the buccal bone 1 year after implant treatment is evenly preserved when implants are immediately loaded in extraction sockets or in healed bone.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment around Single Implants in Healed Ridges and Extraction Sockets Using Cone Beam CT</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment around Single Implants in Healed Ridges and Extraction Sockets Using Cone Beam CT</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Filiep</namePart><namePart type="family">Raes</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc</namePart><affiliation>Clinical assistant, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Liesbet</namePart><namePart type="family">Renckens</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, Msc</namePart><affiliation>clinical assistant, Dental School, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Johan</namePart><namePart type="family">Aps</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>head of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Ghent University Hospital</affiliation><affiliation>visiting professor at Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jan</namePart><namePart type="family">Cosyn</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>¶professor, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>visiting professor, Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Hugo</namePart><namePart type="family">De Bruyn</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, Msc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>chairman and professor, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>visiting professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-10</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">5</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">65</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">6229</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Purpose: Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) provides three‐dimensional information and could absolutely be useful for evaluating circumferential implant bone levels. However, the accuracy and precision of the technique has not been described. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy and precision of CBCT (i‐CAT®, Imaging Sciences International®, Hatfield, PA, USA) using periapical radiographs (PA) as a reference and to evaluate the circumferential bone level on CBCT around immediately loaded single implants placed in healed ridges (CIT, conventional implant treatment) and extraction sockets (IIT, immediate implant placement).</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: PA and CBCT radiographs were obtained from 26 single Astra Tech Osseospeed™ implants (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) 1 year after loading in respectively healed ridges (CIT) or extraction socket (IIT). For accuracy analysis, the three mesial and three distal interproximal levels obtained by CBCT were pooled to enable a comparison with PA. Precision was analyzed by intra‐ and interexaminer reliability calculation from mesial and distal sites on CBCT. The circumferential bone level considered all eight positions assessed on CBCT.</abstract><abstract>Results: Accuracy of CBCT was low (R = 0.325/p = .019) given the fact that bone level of the total group was 0.70 mm (standard deviation [SD] 0.78, range 0.00–3.20) on PA and 0.23 mm (SD 0.27, 0.00–1.20) on CBCT (p < .001) with only 42% of the measurements showing deviation within 0.2 mm. However, intra‐ and interexaminer reliability were favorable (R ≥ 0.611/p < .001, ≥83%). The mean circumferential bone level on CBCT was 0.21 mm (SD 0.30) and 0.26 mm (SD 0.18) for IIT and CIT, respectively. The impact of the treatment strategy was not significant.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: PA should be the standard technique to assess interproximal bone level but correlates poorly with the CBCT measurements. However, the precision of CBCT was high. CBCT requires further improvements of hardware and/or software. Within the limitations of the study, there is an indication that the buccal bone 1 year after implant treatment is evenly preserved when implants are immediately loaded in extraction sockets or in healed bone.</abstract><note type="funding">AstraTech AB</note><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>accuracy and precision</topic><topic>circumferential bone level</topic><topic>cone beam CT</topic><topic>single implant</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>15</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>661</start><end>672</end><total>12</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">C2688CC0DD14C7F8EC983361706904504B7ABB66</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-S6Q68TRC-P</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00393.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID393</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C2688CC0DD14C7F8EC983361706904504B7ABB66/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006064 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006064 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C2688CC0DD14C7F8EC983361706904504B7ABB66
|texte= Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment around Single Implants in Healed Ridges and Extraction Sockets Using Cone Beam CT
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |