Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part VII: Twenty-year patient status
Identifieur interne : 005F25 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005F24; suivant : 005F26Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part VII: Twenty-year patient status
Auteurs : Charles W. Ellinger ; Robert C. Wesley ; Behruz J. Abadi ; Timothy M. ArmentroutSource :
- The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1989.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acceptable elastomeric, Anterior teeth, Articulator, Centric, Centric relation, Cephalometric evaluation, Complete dentures, Custom tray, Dent, Dentistry, Denture, Denture technique, Eccentric records, Edentulous, Ellinger, Foreign objects, Mandibular, Mandibular cast, Maxillary, Maxillary cast, Maxillary custom acrylic resin tray, Occlusion, Original dentures, Patient response, Pipe smoking, Posterior border, Prescription medication, Processing changes, Project dentists, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Quality care, Research project, Saliva ejector, Semiadjustable articulator, Somes, Subjective evaluation.
- Teeft :
- Acceptable elastomeric, Anterior teeth, Articulator, Centric, Centric relation, Cephalometric evaluation, Complete dentures, Custom tray, Dent, Dentistry, Denture, Denture technique, Eccentric records, Edentulous, Ellinger, Foreign objects, Mandibular, Mandibular cast, Maxillary, Maxillary cast, Maxillary custom acrylic resin tray, Occlusion, Original dentures, Patient response, Pipe smoking, Posterior border, Prescription medication, Processing changes, Project dentists, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Quality care, Research project, Saliva ejector, Semiadjustable articulator, Somes, Subjective evaluation.
Abstract
Abstract: Sixty-four patients were originally treated with complete dentures. Two different techniques, complex and standard, were used with 32 patients assigned to each group. Patients were recalled for their 20th year recall and 34 of the original 64 patients returned. Of those 34 patients, 26 patients were still wearing their original dentures. All 26 patients were judged by three project clinicians to have clinically acceptable dentures. In addition, all but two stated that their dentures were clinically acceptable. Neither of these patients were unhappy with fit, but with the esthetics. One patient had worn Ms denture teeth by pipe smoking and the other had bleached the pink out of her denture bases. The remaining eight patients who still participate in the project have had modifications in their original dentures or have had new dentures constructed.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90045-0
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:BF6264F04488B36084DDD027894BD55D920C2ED7Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part VII: Twenty-year patient status</title><author><name sortKey="Ellinger, Charles W" sort="Ellinger, Charles W" uniqKey="Ellinger C" first="Charles W." last="Ellinger">Charles W. Ellinger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wesley, Robert C" sort="Wesley, Robert C" uniqKey="Wesley R" first="Robert C." last="Wesley">Robert C. Wesley</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Abadi, Behruz J" sort="Abadi, Behruz J" uniqKey="Abadi B" first="Behruz J." last="Abadi">Behruz J. Abadi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Armentrout, Timothy M" sort="Armentrout, Timothy M" uniqKey="Armentrout T" first="Timothy M." last="Armentrout">Timothy M. Armentrout</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:BF6264F04488B36084DDD027894BD55D920C2ED7</idno><date when="1989" year="1989">1989</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0022-3913(89)90045-0</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/BF6264F04488B36084DDD027894BD55D920C2ED7/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005F25</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005F25</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part VII: Twenty-year patient status</title><author><name sortKey="Ellinger, Charles W" sort="Ellinger, Charles W" uniqKey="Ellinger C" first="Charles W." last="Ellinger">Charles W. Ellinger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wesley, Robert C" sort="Wesley, Robert C" uniqKey="Wesley R" first="Robert C." last="Wesley">Robert C. Wesley</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Abadi, Behruz J" sort="Abadi, Behruz J" uniqKey="Abadi B" first="Behruz J." last="Abadi">Behruz J. Abadi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Armentrout, Timothy M" sort="Armentrout, Timothy M" uniqKey="Armentrout T" first="Timothy M." last="Armentrout">Timothy M. Armentrout</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1989">1989</date><biblScope unit="volume">62</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="45">45</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="48">48</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acceptable elastomeric</term><term>Anterior teeth</term><term>Articulator</term><term>Centric</term><term>Centric relation</term><term>Cephalometric evaluation</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Custom tray</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture technique</term><term>Eccentric records</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Ellinger</term><term>Foreign objects</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular cast</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary cast</term><term>Maxillary custom acrylic resin tray</term><term>Occlusion</term><term>Original dentures</term><term>Patient response</term><term>Pipe smoking</term><term>Posterior border</term><term>Prescription medication</term><term>Processing changes</term><term>Project dentists</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Quality care</term><term>Research project</term><term>Saliva ejector</term><term>Semiadjustable articulator</term><term>Somes</term><term>Subjective evaluation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acceptable elastomeric</term><term>Anterior teeth</term><term>Articulator</term><term>Centric</term><term>Centric relation</term><term>Cephalometric evaluation</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Custom tray</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture technique</term><term>Eccentric records</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Ellinger</term><term>Foreign objects</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular cast</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary cast</term><term>Maxillary custom acrylic resin tray</term><term>Occlusion</term><term>Original dentures</term><term>Patient response</term><term>Pipe smoking</term><term>Posterior border</term><term>Prescription medication</term><term>Processing changes</term><term>Project dentists</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Quality care</term><term>Research project</term><term>Saliva ejector</term><term>Semiadjustable articulator</term><term>Somes</term><term>Subjective evaluation</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Sixty-four patients were originally treated with complete dentures. Two different techniques, complex and standard, were used with 32 patients assigned to each group. Patients were recalled for their 20th year recall and 34 of the original 64 patients returned. Of those 34 patients, 26 patients were still wearing their original dentures. All 26 patients were judged by three project clinicians to have clinically acceptable dentures. In addition, all but two stated that their dentures were clinically acceptable. Neither of these patients were unhappy with fit, but with the esthetics. One patient had worn Ms denture teeth by pipe smoking and the other had bleached the pink out of her denture bases. The remaining eight patients who still participate in the project have had modifications in their original dentures or have had new dentures constructed.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>original dentures</json:string><json:string>ellinger</json:string><json:string>prosthet</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>patient response</json:string><json:string>articulator</json:string><json:string>denture technique</json:string><json:string>project dentists</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>somes</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>occlusion</json:string><json:string>centric</json:string><json:string>centric relation</json:string><json:string>anterior teeth</json:string><json:string>maxillary cast</json:string><json:string>acceptable elastomeric</json:string><json:string>eccentric records</json:string><json:string>research project</json:string><json:string>quality care</json:string><json:string>subjective evaluation</json:string><json:string>prescription medication</json:string><json:string>posterior border</json:string><json:string>mandibular cast</json:string><json:string>saliva ejector</json:string><json:string>maxillary custom acrylic resin tray</json:string><json:string>semiadjustable articulator</json:string><json:string>pipe smoking</json:string><json:string>cephalometric evaluation</json:string><json:string>custom tray</json:string><json:string>foreign objects</json:string><json:string>processing changes</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Charles W. Ellinger D.D.S., M.Sc.</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Robert C. Wesley D.M.D.</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Behruz J. Abadi D.M.D.</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Timothy M. Armentrout D.M.D.</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Removable prosthodontics</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>89900450</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-QB9QKMRM-X</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Sixty-four patients were originally treated with complete dentures. Two different techniques, complex and standard, were used with 32 patients assigned to each group. Patients were recalled for their 20th year recall and 34 of the original 64 patients returned. Of those 34 patients, 26 patients were still wearing their original dentures. All 26 patients were judged by three project clinicians to have clinically acceptable dentures. In addition, all but two stated that their dentures were clinically acceptable. Neither of these patients were unhappy with fit, but with the esthetics. One patient had worn Ms denture teeth by pipe smoking and the other had bleached the pink out of her denture bases. The remaining eight patients who still participate in the project have had modifications in their original dentures or have had new dentures constructed.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>135</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>868</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>1</keywordCount><score>5.366</score><pdfWordCount>1746</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>12380</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>4</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>611.84 x 828.28 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part VII: Twenty-year patient status</title><pmid><json:string>2664160</json:string></pmid><pii><json:string>0022-3913(89)90045-0</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0022-3913</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0022-3913(89)X8063-5</json:string></pii><volume>62</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>45</first><last>48</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>5</json:string><json:string>20</json:string><json:string>1989</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University of Kentucky</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Michael Child</json:string><json:string>Professor</json:string><json:string>I. Description</json:string><json:string>C. Wesley</json:string><json:string>Men</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Calif.</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-QB9QKMRM-X</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - chirurgie (generalites). transplantations, greffes d'organes et de tissus. pathologie des greffons</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1989</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0022-3913(89)90045-0</json:string></doi><id>BF6264F04488B36084DDD027894BD55D920C2ED7</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BF6264F04488B36084DDD027894BD55D920C2ED7/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BF6264F04488B36084DDD027894BD55D920C2ED7/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/BF6264F04488B36084DDD027894BD55D920C2ED7/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part VII: Twenty-year patient status</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>©1989 The C. V. Mosby Company</p></availability><date>1989</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Presented at the Academy of Denture Prosthetics meeting, Monterey, Calif.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part VII: Twenty-year patient status</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Charles W.</forename><surname>Ellinger</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">D.D.S., M.Sc.</roleName><note type="biography">Reprint requests to:,Dr. Charles W. Ellinger University of Kentucky College of Dentistry Lexington, KY 40500.</note><note type="biography">Professor, Prosthodontics, Department of Oral Health Practice.</note><affiliation>Reprint requests to:,Dr. Charles W. Ellinger University of Kentucky College of Dentistry Lexington, KY 40500.</affiliation><affiliation>Professor, Prosthodontics, Department of Oral Health Practice.</affiliation><affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Robert C.</forename><surname>Wesley</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">D.M.D.</roleName><note type="biography">Associate Professor, Prosthodontics, Department of Oral Health Practice.</note><affiliation>Associate Professor, Prosthodontics, Department of Oral Health Practice.</affiliation><affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Behruz J.</forename><surname>Abadi</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">D.M.D.</roleName><note type="biography">Associate Professor, Prosthodontics, Department of Oral Health Practice.</note><affiliation>Associate Professor, Prosthodontics, Department of Oral Health Practice.</affiliation><affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Timothy M.</forename><surname>Armentrout</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">D.M.D.</roleName><affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">BF6264F04488B36084DDD027894BD55D920C2ED7</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0022-3913(89)90045-0</idno><idno type="PII">0022-3913(89)90045-0</idno><idno type="ArticleID">89900450</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-3913</idno><idno type="PII">S0022-3913(89)X8063-5</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1989"></date><biblScope unit="volume">62</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="45">45</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="48">48</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1989</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abstract: Sixty-four patients were originally treated with complete dentures. Two different techniques, complex and standard, were used with 32 patients assigned to each group. Patients were recalled for their 20th year recall and 34 of the original 64 patients returned. Of those 34 patients, 26 patients were still wearing their original dentures. All 26 patients were judged by three project clinicians to have clinically acceptable dentures. In addition, all but two stated that their dentures were clinically acceptable. Neither of these patients were unhappy with fit, but with the esthetics. One patient had worn Ms denture teeth by pipe smoking and the other had bleached the pink out of her denture bases. The remaining eight patients who still participate in the project have had modifications in their original dentures or have had new dentures constructed.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Removable prosthodontics</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1989">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BF6264F04488B36084DDD027894BD55D920C2ED7/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier doc found" wicri:toSee="Elsevier, no converted or simple article"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 5.0.1//EN//XML" URI="art501.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article version="5.0" xml:lang="en" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>YMPR</jid><aid>89900450</aid><ce:pii>0022-3913(89)90045-0</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0022-3913(89)90045-0</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1989">The C. V. Mosby Company</ce:copyright><ce:doctopics><ce:doctopic><ce:text>Removable prosthodontics</ce:text></ce:doctopic></ce:doctopics></item-info><head><ce:article-footnote><ce:note-para>Presented at the Academy of Denture Prosthetics meeting, Monterey, Calif.</ce:note-para></ce:article-footnote><ce:title>Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part VII: Twenty-year patient status</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Charles W.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Ellinger</ce:surname><ce:degrees>D.D.S., M.Sc.</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="cor1"><ce:sup>*</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="fn1"><ce:sup>*</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Robert C.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Wesley</ce:surname><ce:degrees>D.M.D.</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="fn2"><ce:sup>**</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Behruz J.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Abadi</ce:surname><ce:degrees>D.M.D.</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="fn2"><ce:sup>**</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Timothy M.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Armentrout</ce:surname><ce:degrees>D.M.D.</ce:degrees></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="cor1"><ce:label>*</ce:label><ce:text><ce:italic>Reprint requests to:</ce:italic>,<ce:small-caps>Dr. Charles W. Ellinger University of Kentucky College of Dentistry Lexington, KY</ce:small-caps> 40500.</ce:text></ce:correspondence><ce:footnote id="fn1"><ce:label>*</ce:label><ce:note-para>Professor, Prosthodontics, Department of Oral Health Practice.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote><ce:footnote id="fn2"><ce:label>**</ce:label><ce:note-para>Associate Professor, Prosthodontics, Department of Oral Health Practice.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote></ce:author-group><ce:abstract id="ab1" class="author" xml:lang="en"><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>Sixty-four patients were originally treated with complete dentures. Two different techniques, complex and standard, were used with 32 patients assigned to each group. Patients were recalled for their 20th year recall and 34 of the original 64 patients returned. Of those 34 patients, 26 patients were still wearing their original dentures. All 26 patients were judged by three project clinicians to have clinically acceptable dentures. In addition, all but two stated that their dentures were clinically acceptable. Neither of these patients were unhappy with fit, but with the esthetics. One patient had worn Ms denture teeth by pipe smoking and the other had bleached the pink out of her denture bases. The remaining eight patients who still participate in the project have had modifications in their original dentures or have had new dentures constructed.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head><tail><ce:bibliography><ce:section-title>References</ce:section-title><ce:bibliography-sec><ce:bib-reference id="bib1"><ce:label>1.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Hickey</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Henderson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>D</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Straus</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part I: design of a study</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>22</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1969</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>158</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>170</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib2"><ce:label>2.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Nicol</ce:surname><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Somes</ce:surname><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Ellinger</ce:surname><ce:given-name>C</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Unger</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Fuhrmann</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part II: five-year cephalometric evaluation</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>41</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1979</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>368</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>372</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib3"><ce:label>3.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Ellinger</ce:surname><ce:given-name>C</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Somes</ce:surname><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Nicol</ce:surname><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Unger</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Wesley</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part III: five-year subjective evaluation</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Phosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>42</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1979</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>127</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>130</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib4"><ce:label>4.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Brehm</ce:surname><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Abadi</ce:surname><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part IV: residual ridge resorption—cast evaluation</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>44</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1980</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>491</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>494</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib5"><ce:label>5.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Sabes</ce:surname><ce:given-name>W</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Ellinger</ce:surname><ce:given-name>C</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Tucker</ce:surname><ce:given-name>S</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Somes</ce:surname><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Unger</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Fuhrmann</ce:surname><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part V: microscopic response to oral mucosa</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>45</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1981</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>11</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>13</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib6"><ce:label>6.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Tuncay</ce:surname><ce:given-name>O</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Thomson</ce:surname><ce:given-name>S</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Abadi</ce:surname><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Ellinger</ce:surname><ce:given-name>C</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Cephalometric evaluation of the changes in patients wearing complete dentures. A ten-year longitudinal study</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>51</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1984</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>169</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>180</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib7"><ce:label>7.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:surname>Wesley</ce:surname><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Ellinger</ce:surname><ce:given-name>C</ce:given-name></sb:author><sb:author><ce:surname>Somes</ce:surname><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Patient response to variations in denture techniques. Part VI: mastication of peanuts and carrots</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Prosthet Dent</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>51</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1984</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>467</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>469</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference></ce:bibliography-sec></ce:bibliography></tail></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part VII: Twenty-year patient status</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part VII: Twenty-year patient status</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Charles W.</namePart><namePart type="family">Ellinger</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">D.D.S., M.Sc.</namePart><affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</affiliation><description>Reprint requests to:,Dr. Charles W. Ellinger University of Kentucky College of Dentistry Lexington, KY 40500.</description><description>Professor, Prosthodontics, Department of Oral Health Practice.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Robert C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Wesley</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">D.M.D.</namePart><affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</affiliation><description>Associate Professor, Prosthodontics, Department of Oral Health Practice.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Behruz J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Abadi</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">D.M.D.</namePart><affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</affiliation><description>Associate Professor, Prosthodontics, Department of Oral Health Practice.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Timothy M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Armentrout</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">D.M.D.</namePart><affiliation>University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Ky., USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1989</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1989</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: Sixty-four patients were originally treated with complete dentures. Two different techniques, complex and standard, were used with 32 patients assigned to each group. Patients were recalled for their 20th year recall and 34 of the original 64 patients returned. Of those 34 patients, 26 patients were still wearing their original dentures. All 26 patients were judged by three project clinicians to have clinically acceptable dentures. In addition, all but two stated that their dentures were clinically acceptable. Neither of these patients were unhappy with fit, but with the esthetics. One patient had worn Ms denture teeth by pipe smoking and the other had bleached the pink out of her denture bases. The remaining eight patients who still participate in the project have had modifications in their original dentures or have had new dentures constructed.</abstract><note>Presented at the Academy of Denture Prosthetics meeting, Monterey, Calif.</note><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Removable prosthodontics</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YMPR</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">198907</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0022-3913</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0022-3913(89)X8063-5</identifier><part><date>198907</date><detail type="volume"><number>62</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>1</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>A5</start><end>A22</end></extent><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>1</start><end>126</end></extent><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>A23</start><end>A24</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>45</start><end>48</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">BF6264F04488B36084DDD027894BD55D920C2ED7</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-QB9QKMRM-X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0022-3913(89)90045-0</identifier><identifier type="PII">0022-3913(89)90045-0</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">89900450</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©1989 The C. V. Mosby Company</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>The C. V. Mosby Company, ©1989</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BF6264F04488B36084DDD027894BD55D920C2ED7/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005F25 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005F25 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:BF6264F04488B36084DDD027894BD55D920C2ED7
|texte= Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part VII: Twenty-year patient status
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |