EdenteV2, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 005F13

Treatment planning for replacing missing teeth in UK general dental practice: current trends

Identifieur interne : 005F13 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005F12; suivant : 005F14

Treatment planning for replacing missing teeth in UK general dental practice: current trends

Auteurs : P. M. Patel ; C. D. Lynch ; A. J. Sloan ; A. S. M. Gilmour

Source :

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2010-07.

RBID : ISTEX:BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Abutment teeth, Acrylic denture, Blackwell publishing, Bridge implants, Bridgework, Cantilever, Cantilever bridges, Cardiff, Clinical freedom, Clinical scenario, Complication rates, Contraindication, Conventional bridges, Conventional bridgework, Conventional cantilever bridge, Cost implications, Current practice, Current study, Dent, Dental contract, Dental implants, Dental professionals, Dental protection, Dentate patients, Dentistry, Denture, Denture cantilever, Denture design, Different forms, Different treatment modalities, Funding, Funding arrangements, Further training, Gdp, Health survey, Heath park, Implant, Implant dentistry, Many practitioners, Minimal tooth preparation, Modality, Nancial considerations, National health service, Observation period, Open university press, Oral health, Oral rehab, Partial dentures, Postal questionnaire, Postgraduate education, Practitioner, Private patients, Private practitioners, Prosthet dent, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic care, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontic treatments, Rbbs, Respondent, Respondents percentage, Response rate, Restorative dentistry, Rpds, Several gdps, Success rates, Systematic review, Tissue engineering reparative dentistry, Total number, Treatment modality, Treatment option, Treatment options, Treatment planning, Treatment planning process, Undergraduate teaching, Undergraduate training, Various forms.
Teeft :
- Abutment teeth, Acrylic denture, Blackwell publishing, Bridge implants, Bridgework, Cantilever, Cantilever bridges, Cardiff, Clinical freedom, Clinical scenario, Complication rates, Contraindication, Conventional bridges, Conventional bridgework, Conventional cantilever bridge, Cost implications, Current practice, Current study, Dent, Dental contract, Dental implants, Dental professionals, Dental protection, Dentate patients, Dentistry, Denture, Denture cantilever, Denture design, Different forms, Different treatment modalities, Funding, Funding arrangements, Further training, Gdp, Health survey, Heath park, Implant, Implant dentistry, Many practitioners, Minimal tooth preparation, Modality, Nancial considerations, National health service, Observation period, Open university press, Oral health, Oral rehab, Partial dentures, Postal questionnaire, Postgraduate education, Practitioner, Private patients, Private practitioners, Prosthet dent, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic care, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontic treatments, Rbbs, Respondent, Respondents percentage, Response rate, Restorative dentistry, Rpds, Several gdps, Success rates, Systematic review, Tissue engineering reparative dentistry, Total number, Treatment modality, Treatment option, Treatment options, Treatment planning, Treatment planning process, Undergraduate teaching, Undergraduate training, Various forms.

Abstract

Summary The aim of this study was to examine the confidence, barriers and attitudes towards the replacement of missing teeth by general dental practitioners (GDPs). The perceived impact of the recently introduced National Health Service (NHS) contract on the provision of prosthodontic treatments was also considered. Pre‐piloted postal questionnaires were mailed to 500 GDPs in Wales. Open‐ and closed‐ended questions were utilised to establish confidence, adequacy of training and attitudes towards treatments for replacing missing teeth. Two hundred and seventeen completed questionnaires were received (response rate = 43·4%). Many respondents described themselves as ‘confident’ or ‘very confident’ in the provision of removable partial dentures (RPDs) (acrylic = 100%, metal based = 99·5%), cantilever resin‐bonded bridges (94·4%) and conventional bridgework (98·6%). GDPs were ‘not confident’ providing fixed‐fixed resin‐bonded bridges (21·1%) or implants (81·4%). Financial barriers were identified to the provision of prosthodontic treatments, including comments such as “the new [National Health Service] contract does limit the treatments available”. Privately funded patients were more likely to be offered a fixed bridge or implant replacement of a missing upper first molar, whereas non‐privately funded patients were more likely to be offered no treatment (P < 0·01). Most respondents reported confidence at providing more routine forms of prosthodontic care such as RPDs and bridges. It appears that funding arrangements may have an impact on treatments offered to replace missing teeth, particularly under the current NHS contract.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02077.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Treatment planning for replacing missing teeth in UK general dental practice: current trends</title>
<author><name sortKey="Patel, P M" sort="Patel, P M" uniqKey="Patel P" first="P. M." last="Patel">P. M. Patel</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Vocational Dental Trainee, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lynch, C D" sort="Lynch, C D" uniqKey="Lynch C" first="C. D." last="Lynch">C. D. Lynch</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Tissue Engineering & Reparative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sloan, A J" sort="Sloan, A J" uniqKey="Sloan A" first="A. J." last="Sloan">A. J. Sloan</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Senior Lecturer in Bone Biology & Tissue Engineering, Tissue Engineering & Reparative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gilmour, A S M" sort="Gilmour, A S M" uniqKey="Gilmour A" first="A. S. M." last="Gilmour">A. S. M. Gilmour</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Reader/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Learning & Scholarship, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A</idno>
<date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02077.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005F13</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005F13</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Treatment planning for replacing missing teeth in UK general dental practice: current trends</title>
<author><name sortKey="Patel, P M" sort="Patel, P M" uniqKey="Patel P" first="P. M." last="Patel">P. M. Patel</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Vocational Dental Trainee, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lynch, C D" sort="Lynch, C D" uniqKey="Lynch C" first="C. D." last="Lynch">C. D. Lynch</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Tissue Engineering & Reparative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sloan, A J" sort="Sloan, A J" uniqKey="Sloan A" first="A. J." last="Sloan">A. J. Sloan</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Senior Lecturer in Bone Biology & Tissue Engineering, Tissue Engineering & Reparative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gilmour, A S M" sort="Gilmour, A S M" uniqKey="Gilmour A" first="A. S. M." last="Gilmour">A. S. M. Gilmour</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Reader/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Learning & Scholarship, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">37</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="509">509</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="517">517</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2010-07">2010-07</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment teeth</term>
<term>Acrylic denture</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bridge implants</term>
<term>Bridgework</term>
<term>Cantilever</term>
<term>Cantilever bridges</term>
<term>Cardiff</term>
<term>Clinical freedom</term>
<term>Clinical scenario</term>
<term>Complication rates</term>
<term>Contraindication</term>
<term>Conventional bridges</term>
<term>Conventional bridgework</term>
<term>Conventional cantilever bridge</term>
<term>Cost implications</term>
<term>Current practice</term>
<term>Current study</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental contract</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dental professionals</term>
<term>Dental protection</term>
<term>Dentate patients</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture cantilever</term>
<term>Denture design</term>
<term>Different forms</term>
<term>Different treatment modalities</term>
<term>Funding</term>
<term>Funding arrangements</term>
<term>Further training</term>
<term>Gdp</term>
<term>Health survey</term>
<term>Heath park</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant dentistry</term>
<term>Many practitioners</term>
<term>Minimal tooth preparation</term>
<term>Modality</term>
<term>Nancial considerations</term>
<term>National health service</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Open university press</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral rehab</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Postal questionnaire</term>
<term>Postgraduate education</term>
<term>Practitioner</term>
<term>Private patients</term>
<term>Private practitioners</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthodontic</term>
<term>Prosthodontic care</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatment</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatments</term>
<term>Rbbs</term>
<term>Respondent</term>
<term>Respondents percentage</term>
<term>Response rate</term>
<term>Restorative dentistry</term>
<term>Rpds</term>
<term>Several gdps</term>
<term>Success rates</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Tissue engineering reparative dentistry</term>
<term>Total number</term>
<term>Treatment modality</term>
<term>Treatment option</term>
<term>Treatment options</term>
<term>Treatment planning</term>
<term>Treatment planning process</term>
<term>Undergraduate teaching</term>
<term>Undergraduate training</term>
<term>Various forms</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment teeth</term>
<term>Acrylic denture</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bridge implants</term>
<term>Bridgework</term>
<term>Cantilever</term>
<term>Cantilever bridges</term>
<term>Cardiff</term>
<term>Clinical freedom</term>
<term>Clinical scenario</term>
<term>Complication rates</term>
<term>Contraindication</term>
<term>Conventional bridges</term>
<term>Conventional bridgework</term>
<term>Conventional cantilever bridge</term>
<term>Cost implications</term>
<term>Current practice</term>
<term>Current study</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental contract</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dental professionals</term>
<term>Dental protection</term>
<term>Dentate patients</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture cantilever</term>
<term>Denture design</term>
<term>Different forms</term>
<term>Different treatment modalities</term>
<term>Funding</term>
<term>Funding arrangements</term>
<term>Further training</term>
<term>Gdp</term>
<term>Health survey</term>
<term>Heath park</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant dentistry</term>
<term>Many practitioners</term>
<term>Minimal tooth preparation</term>
<term>Modality</term>
<term>Nancial considerations</term>
<term>National health service</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Open university press</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral rehab</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Postal questionnaire</term>
<term>Postgraduate education</term>
<term>Practitioner</term>
<term>Private patients</term>
<term>Private practitioners</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthodontic</term>
<term>Prosthodontic care</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatment</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatments</term>
<term>Rbbs</term>
<term>Respondent</term>
<term>Respondents percentage</term>
<term>Response rate</term>
<term>Restorative dentistry</term>
<term>Rpds</term>
<term>Several gdps</term>
<term>Success rates</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Tissue engineering reparative dentistry</term>
<term>Total number</term>
<term>Treatment modality</term>
<term>Treatment option</term>
<term>Treatment options</term>
<term>Treatment planning</term>
<term>Treatment planning process</term>
<term>Undergraduate teaching</term>
<term>Undergraduate training</term>
<term>Various forms</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Summary  The aim of this study was to examine the confidence, barriers and attitudes towards the replacement of missing teeth by general dental practitioners (GDPs). The perceived impact of the recently introduced National Health Service (NHS) contract on the provision of prosthodontic treatments was also considered. Pre‐piloted postal questionnaires were mailed to 500 GDPs in Wales. Open‐ and closed‐ended questions were utilised to establish confidence, adequacy of training and attitudes towards treatments for replacing missing teeth. Two hundred and seventeen completed questionnaires were received (response rate = 43·4%). Many respondents described themselves as ‘confident’ or ‘very confident’ in the provision of removable partial dentures (RPDs) (acrylic = 100%, metal based = 99·5%), cantilever resin‐bonded bridges (94·4%) and conventional bridgework (98·6%). GDPs were ‘not confident’ providing fixed‐fixed resin‐bonded bridges (21·1%) or implants (81·4%). Financial barriers were identified to the provision of prosthodontic treatments, including comments such as “the new [National Health Service] contract does limit the treatments available”. Privately funded patients were more likely to be offered a fixed bridge or implant replacement of a missing upper first molar, whereas non‐privately funded patients were more likely to be offered no treatment (P < 0·01). Most respondents reported confidence at providing more routine forms of prosthodontic care such as RPDs and bridges. It appears that funding arrangements may have an impact on treatments offered to replace missing teeth, particularly under the current NHS contract.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string>
<json:string>gdp</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontic</json:string>
<json:string>implant</json:string>
<json:string>rpds</json:string>
<json:string>cantilever</json:string>
<json:string>rbbs</json:string>
<json:string>treatment planning</json:string>
<json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string>
<json:string>contraindication</json:string>
<json:string>cardiff</json:string>
<json:string>dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>conventional bridgework</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontic treatments</json:string>
<json:string>heath park</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontic treatment</json:string>
<json:string>practitioner</json:string>
<json:string>bridgework</json:string>
<json:string>funding arrangements</json:string>
<json:string>partial dentures</json:string>
<json:string>complication rates</json:string>
<json:string>undergraduate training</json:string>
<json:string>oral health</json:string>
<json:string>acrylic denture</json:string>
<json:string>clinical scenario</json:string>
<json:string>further training</json:string>
<json:string>funding</json:string>
<json:string>modality</json:string>
<json:string>various forms</json:string>
<json:string>denture cantilever</json:string>
<json:string>conventional cantilever bridge</json:string>
<json:string>bridge implants</json:string>
<json:string>postal questionnaire</json:string>
<json:string>denture design</json:string>
<json:string>national health service</json:string>
<json:string>systematic review</json:string>
<json:string>abutment teeth</json:string>
<json:string>observation period</json:string>
<json:string>dent</json:string>
<json:string>treatment planning process</json:string>
<json:string>current practice</json:string>
<json:string>restorative dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>open university press</json:string>
<json:string>treatment option</json:string>
<json:string>total number</json:string>
<json:string>respondents percentage</json:string>
<json:string>response rate</json:string>
<json:string>minimal tooth preparation</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontic care</json:string>
<json:string>success rates</json:string>
<json:string>cantilever bridges</json:string>
<json:string>postgraduate education</json:string>
<json:string>nancial considerations</json:string>
<json:string>different forms</json:string>
<json:string>treatment modality</json:string>
<json:string>health survey</json:string>
<json:string>several gdps</json:string>
<json:string>treatment options</json:string>
<json:string>private practitioners</json:string>
<json:string>dental contract</json:string>
<json:string>cost implications</json:string>
<json:string>clinical freedom</json:string>
<json:string>current study</json:string>
<json:string>conventional bridges</json:string>
<json:string>dental professionals</json:string>
<json:string>undergraduate teaching</json:string>
<json:string>private patients</json:string>
<json:string>implant dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>dental implants</json:string>
<json:string>prosthet dent</json:string>
<json:string>many practitioners</json:string>
<json:string>dentate patients</json:string>
<json:string>different treatment modalities</json:string>
<json:string>tissue engineering reparative dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>oral rehab</json:string>
<json:string>dental protection</json:string>
<json:string>respondent</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>P. M. PATEL</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Vocational Dental Trainee, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>C. D. LYNCH</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Tissue Engineering & Reparative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>A. J. SLOAN</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Senior Lecturer in Bone Biology & Tissue Engineering, Tissue Engineering & Reparative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>A. S. M. GILMOUR</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Reader/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Learning & Scholarship, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>missing teeth</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>prosthodontics</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>treatment planning</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>removable partial dentures</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>implants</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>bridges</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId><json:string>JOOR2077</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-JSRVS8G9-3</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Summary  The aim of this study was to examine the confidence, barriers and attitudes towards the replacement of missing teeth by general dental practitioners (GDPs). The perceived impact of the recently introduced National Health Service (NHS) contract on the provision of prosthodontic treatments was also considered. Pre‐piloted postal questionnaires were mailed to 500 GDPs in Wales. Open‐ and closed‐ended questions were utilised to establish confidence, adequacy of training and attitudes towards treatments for replacing missing teeth. Two hundred and seventeen completed questionnaires were received (response rate = 43·4%). Many respondents described themselves as ‘confident’ or ‘very confident’ in the provision of removable partial dentures (RPDs) (acrylic = 100%, metal based = 99·5%), cantilever resin‐bonded bridges (94·4%) and conventional bridgework (98·6%). GDPs were ‘not confident’ providing fixed‐fixed resin‐bonded bridges (21·1%) or implants (81·4%). Financial barriers were identified to the provision of prosthodontic treatments, including comments such as “the new [National Health Service] contract does limit the treatments available”. Privately funded patients were more likely to be offered a fixed bridge or implant replacement of a missing upper first molar, whereas non‐privately funded patients were more likely to be offered no treatment (P > 0·01). Most respondents reported confidence at providing more routine forms of prosthodontic care such as RPDs and bridges. It appears that funding arrangements may have an impact on treatments offered to replace missing teeth, particularly under the current NHS contract.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>9.023</score>
<pdfWordCount>4335</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>28741</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>224</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1649</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>6</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Treatment planning for replacing missing teeth in UK general dental practice: current trends</title>
<pmid><json:string>20374439</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre><json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string>
</doi>
<issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>37</volume>
<issue>7</issue>
<pages><first>509</first>
<last>517</last>
<total>9</total>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1998</json:string>
<json:string>2010</json:string>
<json:string>1978</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName><json:string>National Health Service Patient</json:string>
<json:string>NHS</json:string>
<json:string>Acrylic Denture Co</json:string>
<json:string>Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)</json:string>
<json:string>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</json:string>
<json:string>UK Adult Dental Health Survey</json:string>
<json:string>General Dental Council</json:string>
<json:string>National Health Service</json:string>
<json:string>Dental Protection</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>Mr Stephen</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>UK</json:string>
<json:string>Swansea</json:string>
<json:string>Cardiff</json:string>
<json:string>Wales</json:string>
<json:string>Conventional Cantilever Bridge</json:string>
<json:string>Fixed Conventional Bridge</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl><json:string>Djemal et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Pjetursson et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Goodacre et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Audenino et al.</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-JSRVS8G9-3</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string>
</scopus>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2010</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02077.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Treatment planning for replacing missing teeth in UK general dental practice: current trends</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability><licence>© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="2010-07"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Treatment planning for replacing missing teeth in UK general dental practice: current trends</title>
<title level="a" type="short">TREATMENT PLANNING FOR MISSING TEETH</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">P. M.</forename>
<surname>PATEL</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Vocational Dental Trainee, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">C. D.</forename>
<surname>LYNCH</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Tissue Engineering & Reparative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">A. J.</forename>
<surname>SLOAN</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Senior Lecturer in Bone Biology & Tissue Engineering, Tissue Engineering & Reparative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">A. S. M.</forename>
<surname>GILMOUR</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Reader/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Learning & Scholarship, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK<address><country key="GB"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-JSRVS8G9-3</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02077.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">JOOR2077</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR2077.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jor.2010.37.issue-7</idno>
<idno type="product">JOOR</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">37</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="509">509</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="517">517</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2010-07"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Summary </hi>
 The aim of this study was to examine the confidence, barriers and attitudes towards the replacement of missing teeth by general dental practitioners (GDPs). The perceived impact of the recently introduced National Health Service (NHS) contract on the provision of prosthodontic treatments was also considered. Pre‐piloted postal questionnaires were mailed to 500 GDPs in Wales. Open‐ and closed‐ended questions were utilised to establish confidence, adequacy of training and attitudes towards treatments for replacing missing teeth. Two hundred and seventeen completed questionnaires were received (response rate = 43·4%). Many respondents described themselves as ‘confident’ or ‘very confident’ in the provision of removable partial dentures (RPDs) (acrylic = 100%, metal based = 99·5%), cantilever resin‐bonded bridges (94·4%) and conventional bridgework (98·6%). GDPs were ‘not confident’ providing fixed‐fixed resin‐bonded bridges (21·1%) or implants (81·4%). Financial barriers were identified to the provision of prosthodontic treatments, including comments such as “the new [National Health Service] contract does limit the treatments available”. Privately funded patients were more likely to be offered a fixed bridge or implant replacement of a missing upper first molar, whereas non‐privately funded patients were more likely to be offered no treatment (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>
 < 0·01). Most respondents reported confidence at providing more routine forms of prosthodontic care such as RPDs and bridges. It appears that funding arrangements may have an impact on treatments offered to replace missing teeth, particularly under the current NHS contract.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">missing teeth</term>
<term xml:id="k2">prosthodontics</term>
<term xml:id="k3">treatment planning</term>
<term xml:id="k4">removable partial dentures</term>
<term xml:id="k5">implants</term>
<term xml:id="k6">bridges</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi>
<issn type="print">0305-182X</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn>
<idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="07007"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jor.2010.37.issue-7</doi>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="37">37</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="7">7</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2010-07">July 2010</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02077.x</doi>
<idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR2077"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright>
<eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-03-29"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-06-02"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.6 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-06-03"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="509">509</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="517">517</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo>Dr Christopher D. Lynch, School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XY, UK. E‐mail: <email>lynchcd@cardiff.ac.uk</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR2077.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 1 February 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory>
<countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="3"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="7"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main">Treatment planning for replacing missing teeth in UK general dental practice: current trends</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">P. M. PATEL <i>et al.</i>
</title>
<title type="short">TREATMENT PLANNING FOR MISSING TEETH</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>P. M.</givenNames>
<familyName>PATEL</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>C. D.</givenNames>
<familyName>LYNCH</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>A. J.</givenNames>
<familyName>SLOAN</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>A. S. M.</givenNames>
<familyName>GILMOUR</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Vocational Dental Trainee, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Tissue Engineering & Reparative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a3"><unparsedAffiliation>Senior Lecturer in Bone Biology & Tissue Engineering, Tissue Engineering & Reparative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="GB"><unparsedAffiliation>Reader/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Learning & Scholarship, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">missing teeth</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">prosthodontics</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">treatment planning</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k4">removable partial dentures</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k5">implants</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k6">bridges</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Summary </b>
 The aim of this study was to examine the confidence, barriers and attitudes towards the replacement of missing teeth by general dental practitioners (GDPs). The perceived impact of the recently introduced National Health Service (NHS) contract on the provision of prosthodontic treatments was also considered. Pre‐piloted postal questionnaires were mailed to 500 GDPs in Wales. Open‐ and closed‐ended questions were utilised to establish confidence, adequacy of training and attitudes towards treatments for replacing missing teeth. Two hundred and seventeen completed questionnaires were received (response rate = 43·4%). Many respondents described themselves as ‘confident’ or ‘very confident’ in the provision of removable partial dentures (RPDs) (acrylic = 100%, metal based = 99·5%), cantilever resin‐bonded bridges (94·4%) and conventional bridgework (98·6%). GDPs were ‘not confident’ providing fixed‐fixed resin‐bonded bridges (21·1%) or implants (81·4%). Financial barriers were identified to the provision of prosthodontic treatments, including comments such as “the new [National Health Service] contract does limit the treatments available”. Privately funded patients were more likely to be offered a fixed bridge or implant replacement of a missing upper first molar, whereas non‐privately funded patients were more likely to be offered no treatment (<i>P</i>
 < 0·01). Most respondents reported confidence at providing more routine forms of prosthodontic care such as RPDs and bridges. It appears that funding arrangements may have an impact on treatments offered to replace missing teeth, particularly under the current NHS contract.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Treatment planning for replacing missing teeth in UK general dental practice: current trends</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>TREATMENT PLANNING FOR MISSING TEETH</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Treatment planning for replacing missing teeth in UK general dental practice: current trends</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">P. M.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">PATEL</namePart>
<affiliation>Vocational Dental Trainee, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C. D.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">LYNCH</namePart>
<affiliation>Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Tissue Engineering & Reparative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A. J.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">SLOAN</namePart>
<affiliation>Senior Lecturer in Bone Biology & Tissue Engineering, Tissue Engineering & Reparative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A. S. M.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">GILMOUR</namePart>
<affiliation>Reader/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Learning & Scholarship, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-07</dateIssued>
<edition>Accepted for publication 1 February 2010</edition>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">3</extent>
<extent unit="tables">7</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract>Summary  The aim of this study was to examine the confidence, barriers and attitudes towards the replacement of missing teeth by general dental practitioners (GDPs). The perceived impact of the recently introduced National Health Service (NHS) contract on the provision of prosthodontic treatments was also considered. Pre‐piloted postal questionnaires were mailed to 500 GDPs in Wales. Open‐ and closed‐ended questions were utilised to establish confidence, adequacy of training and attitudes towards treatments for replacing missing teeth. Two hundred and seventeen completed questionnaires were received (response rate = 43·4%). Many respondents described themselves as ‘confident’ or ‘very confident’ in the provision of removable partial dentures (RPDs) (acrylic = 100%, metal based = 99·5%), cantilever resin‐bonded bridges (94·4%) and conventional bridgework (98·6%). GDPs were ‘not confident’ providing fixed‐fixed resin‐bonded bridges (21·1%) or implants (81·4%). Financial barriers were identified to the provision of prosthodontic treatments, including comments such as “the new [National Health Service] contract does limit the treatments available”. Privately funded patients were more likely to be offered a fixed bridge or implant replacement of a missing upper first molar, whereas non‐privately funded patients were more likely to be offered no treatment (P < 0·01). Most respondents reported confidence at providing more routine forms of prosthodontic care such as RPDs and bridges. It appears that funding arrangements may have an impact on treatments offered to replace missing teeth, particularly under the current NHS contract.</abstract>
<subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>missing teeth</topic>
<topic>prosthodontics</topic>
<topic>treatment planning</topic>
<topic>removable partial dentures</topic>
<topic>implants</topic>
<topic>bridges</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier>
<part><date>2010</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>37</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>7</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>509</start>
<end>517</end>
<total>9</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-JSRVS8G9-3</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02077.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR2077</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005F13 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005F13 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:BF310BB922D61967F171BE263A575CF1EA7FB13A
   |texte=   Treatment planning for replacing missing teeth in UK general dental practice: current trends
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Treatment planning for replacing missing teeth in UK general dental practice: current trends

Treatment planning for replacing missing teeth in UK general dental practice: current trends

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri