Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers
Identifieur interne : 005E60 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005E59; suivant : 005E61Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers
Auteurs : Spyros Koronis ; Evangelos Pizatos ; Gregory Polyzois ; Panagiotis LagouvardosSource :
- Gerodontology [ 0734-0664 ] ; 2012-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adhesive, Adhesive cushion, Clinical evaluation, Complete denture wearers, Dent, Dent assoc, Dental school, Denture, Denture adhesives, Denture cushion adhesives, Denture retention, Fittydent, Gerodontology, Gerodontology society, Good sense, John wiley sons gerodontology, Kapur, Kapur index, Lower denture, Masticatory, Masticatory ability, Participant, Poor kapur index, Poor retention, Previous dentures, Prosthet dent, Social activities, Wearer.
- Teeft :
- Adhesive, Adhesive cushion, Clinical evaluation, Complete denture wearers, Dent, Dent assoc, Dental school, Denture, Denture adhesives, Denture cushion adhesives, Denture retention, Fittydent, Gerodontology, Gerodontology society, Good sense, John wiley sons gerodontology, Kapur, Kapur index, Lower denture, Masticatory, Masticatory ability, Participant, Poor kapur index, Poor retention, Previous dentures, Prosthet dent, Social activities, Wearer.
Abstract
doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2010.436.x
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.436.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:BE170F6F9791BCB7020406834E8C86BE12A1117DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers</title><author><name sortKey="Koronis, Spyros" sort="Koronis, Spyros" uniqKey="Koronis S" first="Spyros" last="Koronis">Spyros Koronis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Athens, Greece</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pizatos, Evangelos" sort="Pizatos, Evangelos" uniqKey="Pizatos E" first="Evangelos" last="Pizatos">Evangelos Pizatos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Athens, Greece</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Polyzois, Gregory" sort="Polyzois, Gregory" uniqKey="Polyzois G" first="Gregory" last="Polyzois">Gregory Polyzois</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lagouvardos, Panagiotis" sort="Lagouvardos, Panagiotis" uniqKey="Lagouvardos P" first="Panagiotis" last="Lagouvardos">Panagiotis Lagouvardos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:BE170F6F9791BCB7020406834E8C86BE12A1117D</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.436.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/BE170F6F9791BCB7020406834E8C86BE12A1117D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005E60</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005E60</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers</title><author><name sortKey="Koronis, Spyros" sort="Koronis, Spyros" uniqKey="Koronis S" first="Spyros" last="Koronis">Spyros Koronis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Athens, Greece</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pizatos, Evangelos" sort="Pizatos, Evangelos" uniqKey="Pizatos E" first="Evangelos" last="Pizatos">Evangelos Pizatos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Athens, Greece</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Polyzois, Gregory" sort="Polyzois, Gregory" uniqKey="Polyzois G" first="Gregory" last="Polyzois">Gregory Polyzois</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lagouvardos, Panagiotis" sort="Lagouvardos, Panagiotis" uniqKey="Lagouvardos P" first="Panagiotis" last="Lagouvardos">Panagiotis Lagouvardos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Gerodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">GERODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0734-0664</idno><idno type="eISSN">1741-2358</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="e161">e161</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="e169">e169</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-06">2012-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0734-0664</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0734-0664</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adhesive</term><term>Adhesive cushion</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Complete denture wearers</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent assoc</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture adhesives</term><term>Denture cushion adhesives</term><term>Denture retention</term><term>Fittydent</term><term>Gerodontology</term><term>Gerodontology society</term><term>Good sense</term><term>John wiley sons gerodontology</term><term>Kapur</term><term>Kapur index</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory ability</term><term>Participant</term><term>Poor kapur index</term><term>Poor retention</term><term>Previous dentures</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Social activities</term><term>Wearer</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adhesive</term><term>Adhesive cushion</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Complete denture wearers</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent assoc</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture adhesives</term><term>Denture cushion adhesives</term><term>Denture retention</term><term>Fittydent</term><term>Gerodontology</term><term>Gerodontology society</term><term>Good sense</term><term>John wiley sons gerodontology</term><term>Kapur</term><term>Kapur index</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory ability</term><term>Participant</term><term>Poor kapur index</term><term>Poor retention</term><term>Previous dentures</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Social activities</term><term>Wearer</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2010.436.x</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>kapur</json:string><json:string>denture adhesives</json:string><json:string>gerodontology</json:string><json:string>fittydent</json:string><json:string>kapur index</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons gerodontology</json:string><json:string>gerodontology society</json:string><json:string>masticatory</json:string><json:string>wearer</json:string><json:string>lower denture</json:string><json:string>poor kapur index</json:string><json:string>adhesive</json:string><json:string>masticatory ability</json:string><json:string>denture cushion adhesives</json:string><json:string>social activities</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>participant</json:string><json:string>dental school</json:string><json:string>adhesive cushion</json:string><json:string>good sense</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>clinical evaluation</json:string><json:string>denture retention</json:string><json:string>previous dentures</json:string><json:string>complete denture wearers</json:string><json:string>poor retention</json:string><json:string>dent assoc</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Spyros Koronis</name><affiliations><json:string>Private Practice, Athens, Greece</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Evangelos Pizatos</name><affiliations><json:string>Private Practice, Athens, Greece</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Gregory Polyzois</name><affiliations><json:string>Division of Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Panagiotis Lagouvardos</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>denture adhesive</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cushion</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>questionnaire</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>evaluation</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>GER436</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-HPZLR5CB-0</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2010.436.x</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.793</score><pdfWordCount>3769</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>25074</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 790.866 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>2</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>35</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers</title><pmid><json:string>21083736</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Gerodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1741-2358</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0734-0664</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1741-2358</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>GER</json:string></publisherId><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>e161</first><last>e169</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1935</json:string><json:string>1920s</json:string><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>18th century</json:string><json:string>1930s</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Kapodistrian University</json:string><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Fittydent International</json:string><json:string>National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</json:string><json:string>Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, National</json:string><json:string>American Dental Association</json:string><json:string>Research and Ethics Committee of the University of Athens Dental School</json:string><json:string>Dental Materials, Instruments</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Council</json:string><json:string>Panagiotis Lagouvardos</json:string><json:string>Gerodontology Society</json:string><json:string>Gregory Polyzois</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Greece</json:string><json:string>Austria</json:string><json:string>Athens</json:string><json:string>Flensburg</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Uysal et al.</json:string><json:string>Kulak et al.</json:string><json:string>Feller et al.</json:string><json:string>S. Koronis et al.</json:string><json:string>Fujimori et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-HPZLR5CB-0</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - geriatrics & gerontology</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Geriatrics and Gerontology</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.436.x</json:string></doi><id>BE170F6F9791BCB7020406834E8C86BE12A1117D</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BE170F6F9791BCB7020406834E8C86BE12A1117D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BE170F6F9791BCB7020406834E8C86BE12A1117D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/BE170F6F9791BCB7020406834E8C86BE12A1117D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 The Gerodontology Society and John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers</title><title level="a" type="short">Evaluation of denture adhesives</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Spyros</forename><surname>Koronis</surname></persName><affiliation>Private Practice, Athens, Greece<address><country key="GR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Evangelos</forename><surname>Pizatos</surname></persName><affiliation>Private Practice, Athens, Greece<address><country key="GR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Gregory</forename><surname>Polyzois</surname></persName><affiliation>Division of Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece<address><country key="GR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Panagiotis</forename><surname>Lagouvardos</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece<address><country key="GR"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">BE170F6F9791BCB7020406834E8C86BE12A1117D</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-HPZLR5CB-0</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.436.x</idno><idno type="unit">GER436</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:GER.GER436.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Gerodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">GERODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0734-0664</idno><idno type="eISSN">1741-2358</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1741-2358</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/ger.2012.29.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">GER</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="e161">e161</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="e169">e169</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="italic">doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2010.436.x</hi></p><p><hi rend="bold">Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers</hi></p><p><hi rend="bold">Objective: </hi> The aim of this study was the clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives and whether the results were correlated to Kapur Index for denture‐supporting tissues.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Background: </hi> Various types of denture adhesives are used among denture patients. However, information on the clinical behaviour of denture cushions is limited.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and methods: </hi> Thirty edentulous patients had their denture‐supporting tissues scored by Kapur Index and their old dentures replaced. They received three brands of denture cushion adhesives (Fittydent<hi rend="superscript">®</hi>, Protefix<hi rend="superscript">®</hi> and Seabond<hi rend="superscript">®</hi>) and were instructed to use them in a sequence according to the group they were randomly assigned to. Each brand of adhesive was used for 48 h on the lower denture according to the manufacturer’s suggestions. After each brand was used, participants spent 24 h without applying any sort of adhesive. Finally, a questionnaire evaluating and comparing the performance of each brand was filled out.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> Denture adhesives generally improved patient satisfaction and masticatory ability, especially in participants with poor Kapur Index and those who reported a poor retention of their old dentures.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> Fittydent<hi rend="superscript">®</hi> was the most preferred adhesive, showing the best retention and the longest duration of its effect, but also reported as difficult to remove from the denture‐bearing area.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">denture adhesive</term><term xml:id="k2">cushion</term><term xml:id="k3">questionnaire</term><term xml:id="k4">evaluation</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original article</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BE170F6F9791BCB7020406834E8C86BE12A1117D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1741-2358</doi><issn type="print">0734-0664</issn><issn type="electronic">1741-2358</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="GER"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="GERODONTOLOGY">Gerodontology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ger.2012.29.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="29">29</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-06">June 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="41" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.436.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="GER436"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1"><i>Original Articles</i></title><title type="articleCategory"><i>Original article</i></title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 The Gerodontology Society and John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.6 mode:FullText" date="2012-08-17"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-11-17"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-05-22"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-11-17"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-26"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">e161</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">e169</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr Gregory Polyzois, Division of Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School of Athens, 2 Thivon str Goudi, 115 27 Athens, Greece.
Tel.: +30 210 746 1129
Fax: +30 210 746 1189
E‐mail: <email>grepolyz@dent.uoa.gr</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:GER.GER436.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted 20 July 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="5"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers</title><title type="shortAuthors"><i>S. Koronis et al.</i></title><title type="short"><i>Evaluation of denture adhesives</i></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Spyros</givenNames><familyName>Koronis</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Evangelos</givenNames><familyName>Pizatos</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Gregory</givenNames><familyName>Polyzois</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Panagiotis</givenNames><familyName>Lagouvardos</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="GR"><unparsedAffiliation>Private Practice, Athens, Greece</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="GR"><unparsedAffiliation>Division of Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="GR"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">denture adhesive</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">cushion</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">questionnaire</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">evaluation</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><i>doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2010.436.x</i></p><p><b>Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers</b></p><p><b>Objective: </b> The aim of this study was the clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives and whether the results were correlated to Kapur Index for denture‐supporting tissues.</p><p><b>Background: </b> Various types of denture adhesives are used among denture patients. However, information on the clinical behaviour of denture cushions is limited.</p><p><b>Materials and methods: </b> Thirty edentulous patients had their denture‐supporting tissues scored by Kapur Index and their old dentures replaced. They received three brands of denture cushion adhesives (Fittydent<sup>®</sup>, Protefix<sup>®</sup> and Seabond<sup>®</sup>) and were instructed to use them in a sequence according to the group they were randomly assigned to. Each brand of adhesive was used for 48 h on the lower denture according to the manufacturer’s suggestions. After each brand was used, participants spent 24 h without applying any sort of adhesive. Finally, a questionnaire evaluating and comparing the performance of each brand was filled out.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Denture adhesives generally improved patient satisfaction and masticatory ability, especially in participants with poor Kapur Index and those who reported a poor retention of their old dentures.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> Fittydent<sup>®</sup> was the most preferred adhesive, showing the best retention and the longest duration of its effect, but also reported as difficult to remove from the denture‐bearing area.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Evaluation of denture adhesives</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Spyros</namePart><namePart type="family">Koronis</namePart><affiliation>Private Practice, Athens, Greece</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Evangelos</namePart><namePart type="family">Pizatos</namePart><affiliation>Private Practice, Athens, Greece</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gregory</namePart><namePart type="family">Polyzois</namePart><affiliation>Division of Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Panagiotis</namePart><namePart type="family">Lagouvardos</namePart><affiliation>Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-06</dateIssued><edition>Accepted 20 July 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">5</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2010.436.x</abstract><abstract>Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers</abstract><abstract>Objective: The aim of this study was the clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives and whether the results were correlated to Kapur Index for denture‐supporting tissues.</abstract><abstract>Background: Various types of denture adhesives are used among denture patients. However, information on the clinical behaviour of denture cushions is limited.</abstract><abstract>Materials and methods: Thirty edentulous patients had their denture‐supporting tissues scored by Kapur Index and their old dentures replaced. They received three brands of denture cushion adhesives (Fittydent®, Protefix® and Seabond®) and were instructed to use them in a sequence according to the group they were randomly assigned to. Each brand of adhesive was used for 48 h on the lower denture according to the manufacturer’s suggestions. After each brand was used, participants spent 24 h without applying any sort of adhesive. Finally, a questionnaire evaluating and comparing the performance of each brand was filled out.</abstract><abstract>Results: Denture adhesives generally improved patient satisfaction and masticatory ability, especially in participants with poor Kapur Index and those who reported a poor retention of their old dentures.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: Fittydent® was the most preferred adhesive, showing the best retention and the longest duration of its effect, but also reported as difficult to remove from the denture‐bearing area.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>denture adhesive</topic><topic>cushion</topic><topic>questionnaire</topic><topic>evaluation</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Gerodontology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0734-0664</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1741-2358</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1741-2358</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">GER</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>29</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>e161</start><end>e169</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">BE170F6F9791BCB7020406834E8C86BE12A1117D</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-HPZLR5CB-0</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.436.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">GER436</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 The Gerodontology Society and John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BE170F6F9791BCB7020406834E8C86BE12A1117D/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005E60 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005E60 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:BE170F6F9791BCB7020406834E8C86BE12A1117D
|texte= Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |