Tactile Sensibility of Single‐Tooth Implants and Natural Teeth Under Local Anesthesia of the Natural Antagonistic Teeth
Identifieur interne : 005C99 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005C98; suivant : 005D00Tactile Sensibility of Single‐Tooth Implants and Natural Teeth Under Local Anesthesia of the Natural Antagonistic Teeth
Auteurs : Norbert Enkling ; Stefan Heussner ; Claudia Nicolay ; Stefan Bayer ; Regina Mericske-Stern ; Karl-Heinz UtzSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2012-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Anesthesia, Anesthetized, Anesthetized antagonists, Antagonistic teeth, Articaine, Assistant professor, Bone conduction, Catholic university leuven, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Contralateral pair, Contralateral side, Control side, Control teeth, Control tooth, Control tooth side, Copper foils, Dent, Dental implants, Dental materials science, Dynamic loads, Foil thickness, Foil thicknesses, Foreign bodies, Gender dependency, Gender distribution, Human subjects, Implant, Implant region, Implant side, Implant side tooth side, Intraindividual, Intraindividual difference, Intraindividual differences, Jacobs, Leuven, Local anesthesia, Local anesthetization, Medical dissertation, Muscle receptors, Natural antagonists, Natural teeth, Norbert enkling, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral perception sensibility, Oral rehabil, Osseointegrated implants, Osseoperception, Periimplant tissue, Periodontal, Periodontal receptors, Periodontium, Pharmacol physiol, Physiological basis, Posterior teeth, Preclinical education, Present study, Pulpal receptors, Receptor, Sensibility, Sensibility curve, Small support area, Standard deviation, Statistical evaluation, Steenberghe, Steep slope, Support area, Support area value, Support areas, Tactile, Tactile perception, Tactile sensibility, Tactile sensitivity, Test persons, Test subject, Value implant side, Vice chair, Weibull distribution.
- Teeft :
- Anesthesia, Anesthetized, Anesthetized antagonists, Antagonistic teeth, Articaine, Assistant professor, Bone conduction, Catholic university leuven, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Contralateral pair, Contralateral side, Control side, Control teeth, Control tooth, Control tooth side, Copper foils, Dent, Dental implants, Dental materials science, Dynamic loads, Foil thickness, Foil thicknesses, Foreign bodies, Gender dependency, Gender distribution, Human subjects, Implant, Implant region, Implant side, Implant side tooth side, Intraindividual, Intraindividual difference, Intraindividual differences, Jacobs, Leuven, Local anesthesia, Local anesthetization, Medical dissertation, Muscle receptors, Natural antagonists, Natural teeth, Norbert enkling, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral perception sensibility, Oral rehabil, Osseointegrated implants, Osseoperception, Periimplant tissue, Periodontal, Periodontal receptors, Periodontium, Pharmacol physiol, Physiological basis, Posterior teeth, Preclinical education, Present study, Pulpal receptors, Receptor, Sensibility, Sensibility curve, Small support area, Standard deviation, Statistical evaluation, Steenberghe, Steep slope, Support area, Support area value, Support areas, Tactile, Tactile perception, Tactile sensibility, Tactile sensitivity, Test persons, Test subject, Value implant side, Vice chair, Weibull distribution.
Abstract
Introduction and Aim: The term osseoperception describes the capability of developing a subtle tactile sensibility over dental implants. The present clinical study aims at clarifying the question of how far tactile sensibility is to be attributed to the periodontium of the natural opposing tooth of the implant.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00252.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:BACCB443E81E40EA1AB17BC66BA2F5E3F4917BE1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Tactile Sensibility of Single‐Tooth Implants and Natural Teeth Under Local Anesthesia of the Natural Antagonistic Teeth</title><author><name sortKey="Enkling, Norbert" sort="Enkling, Norbert" uniqKey="Enkling N" first="Norbert" last="Enkling">Norbert Enkling</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant professor and vice chair, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Switzerland;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: norbert.enkling@zmk.unibe.ch</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Heussner, Stefan" sort="Heussner, Stefan" uniqKey="Heussner S" first="Stefan" last="Heussner">Stefan Heussner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nicolay, Claudia" sort="Nicolay, Claudia" uniqKey="Nicolay C" first="Claudia" last="Nicolay">Claudia Nicolay</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>senior research fellow, Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bayer, Stefan" sort="Bayer, Stefan" uniqKey="Bayer S" first="Stefan" last="Bayer">Stefan Bayer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mericske Tern, Regina" sort="Mericske Tern, Regina" uniqKey="Mericske Tern R" first="Regina" last="Mericske-Stern">Regina Mericske-Stern</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor and chair, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Switzerland;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Utz, Karl Einz" sort="Utz, Karl Einz" uniqKey="Utz K" first="Karl-Heinz" last="Utz">Karl-Heinz Utz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>associate professor and vice chair, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:BACCB443E81E40EA1AB17BC66BA2F5E3F4917BE1</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00252.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/BACCB443E81E40EA1AB17BC66BA2F5E3F4917BE1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005C99</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005C99</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Tactile Sensibility of Single‐Tooth Implants and Natural Teeth Under Local Anesthesia of the Natural Antagonistic Teeth</title><author><name sortKey="Enkling, Norbert" sort="Enkling, Norbert" uniqKey="Enkling N" first="Norbert" last="Enkling">Norbert Enkling</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant professor and vice chair, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Switzerland;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: norbert.enkling@zmk.unibe.ch</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Heussner, Stefan" sort="Heussner, Stefan" uniqKey="Heussner S" first="Stefan" last="Heussner">Stefan Heussner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nicolay, Claudia" sort="Nicolay, Claudia" uniqKey="Nicolay C" first="Claudia" last="Nicolay">Claudia Nicolay</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>senior research fellow, Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bayer, Stefan" sort="Bayer, Stefan" uniqKey="Bayer S" first="Stefan" last="Bayer">Stefan Bayer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mericske Tern, Regina" sort="Mericske Tern, Regina" uniqKey="Mericske Tern R" first="Regina" last="Mericske-Stern">Regina Mericske-Stern</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor and chair, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Switzerland;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Utz, Karl Einz" sort="Utz, Karl Einz" uniqKey="Utz K" first="Karl-Heinz" last="Utz">Karl-Heinz Utz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>associate professor and vice chair, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="273">273</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="280">280</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-04">2012-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anesthesia</term><term>Anesthetized</term><term>Anesthetized antagonists</term><term>Antagonistic teeth</term><term>Articaine</term><term>Assistant professor</term><term>Bone conduction</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Contralateral pair</term><term>Contralateral side</term><term>Control side</term><term>Control teeth</term><term>Control tooth</term><term>Control tooth side</term><term>Copper foils</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental materials science</term><term>Dynamic loads</term><term>Foil thickness</term><term>Foil thicknesses</term><term>Foreign bodies</term><term>Gender dependency</term><term>Gender distribution</term><term>Human subjects</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant region</term><term>Implant side</term><term>Implant side tooth side</term><term>Intraindividual</term><term>Intraindividual difference</term><term>Intraindividual differences</term><term>Jacobs</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Local anesthesia</term><term>Local anesthetization</term><term>Medical dissertation</term><term>Muscle receptors</term><term>Natural antagonists</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Norbert enkling</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral perception sensibility</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseoperception</term><term>Periimplant tissue</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal receptors</term><term>Periodontium</term><term>Pharmacol physiol</term><term>Physiological basis</term><term>Posterior teeth</term><term>Preclinical education</term><term>Present study</term><term>Pulpal receptors</term><term>Receptor</term><term>Sensibility</term><term>Sensibility curve</term><term>Small support area</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Statistical evaluation</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Steep slope</term><term>Support area</term><term>Support area value</term><term>Support areas</term><term>Tactile</term><term>Tactile perception</term><term>Tactile sensibility</term><term>Tactile sensitivity</term><term>Test persons</term><term>Test subject</term><term>Value implant side</term><term>Vice chair</term><term>Weibull distribution</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Anesthesia</term><term>Anesthetized</term><term>Anesthetized antagonists</term><term>Antagonistic teeth</term><term>Articaine</term><term>Assistant professor</term><term>Bone conduction</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Contralateral pair</term><term>Contralateral side</term><term>Control side</term><term>Control teeth</term><term>Control tooth</term><term>Control tooth side</term><term>Copper foils</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental materials science</term><term>Dynamic loads</term><term>Foil thickness</term><term>Foil thicknesses</term><term>Foreign bodies</term><term>Gender dependency</term><term>Gender distribution</term><term>Human subjects</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant region</term><term>Implant side</term><term>Implant side tooth side</term><term>Intraindividual</term><term>Intraindividual difference</term><term>Intraindividual differences</term><term>Jacobs</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Local anesthesia</term><term>Local anesthetization</term><term>Medical dissertation</term><term>Muscle receptors</term><term>Natural antagonists</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Norbert enkling</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral perception sensibility</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseoperception</term><term>Periimplant tissue</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal receptors</term><term>Periodontium</term><term>Pharmacol physiol</term><term>Physiological basis</term><term>Posterior teeth</term><term>Preclinical education</term><term>Present study</term><term>Pulpal receptors</term><term>Receptor</term><term>Sensibility</term><term>Sensibility curve</term><term>Small support area</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Statistical evaluation</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Steep slope</term><term>Support area</term><term>Support area value</term><term>Support areas</term><term>Tactile</term><term>Tactile perception</term><term>Tactile sensibility</term><term>Tactile sensitivity</term><term>Test persons</term><term>Test subject</term><term>Value implant side</term><term>Vice chair</term><term>Weibull distribution</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Introduction and Aim: The term osseoperception describes the capability of developing a subtle tactile sensibility over dental implants. The present clinical study aims at clarifying the question of how far tactile sensibility is to be attributed to the periodontium of the natural opposing tooth of the implant.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>osseoperception</json:string><json:string>receptor</json:string><json:string>anesthesia</json:string><json:string>tactile sensibility</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>leuven</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>steenberghe</json:string><json:string>articaine</json:string><json:string>implant side</json:string><json:string>intraindividual</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>tactile</json:string><json:string>test persons</json:string><json:string>periodontium</json:string><json:string>support area</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>control tooth side</json:string><json:string>catholic university leuven</json:string><json:string>local anesthesia</json:string><json:string>oral rehabil</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>anesthetized antagonists</json:string><json:string>intraindividual difference</json:string><json:string>periodontal receptors</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>anesthetized</json:string><json:string>sensibility</json:string><json:string>control teeth</json:string><json:string>control side</json:string><json:string>support areas</json:string><json:string>foreign bodies</json:string><json:string>foil thickness</json:string><json:string>pharmacol physiol</json:string><json:string>copper foils</json:string><json:string>oral perception sensibility</json:string><json:string>tactile sensitivity</json:string><json:string>jacobs</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>foil thicknesses</json:string><json:string>local anesthetization</json:string><json:string>antagonistic teeth</json:string><json:string>preclinical education</json:string><json:string>bone conduction</json:string><json:string>weibull distribution</json:string><json:string>implant region</json:string><json:string>dental materials science</json:string><json:string>statistical evaluation</json:string><json:string>small support area</json:string><json:string>steep slope</json:string><json:string>physiological basis</json:string><json:string>value implant side</json:string><json:string>intraindividual differences</json:string><json:string>contralateral pair</json:string><json:string>support area value</json:string><json:string>control tooth</json:string><json:string>natural antagonists</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>implant side tooth side</json:string><json:string>standard deviation</json:string><json:string>posterior teeth</json:string><json:string>gender dependency</json:string><json:string>pulpal receptors</json:string><json:string>muscle receptors</json:string><json:string>test subject</json:string><json:string>periimplant tissue</json:string><json:string>dynamic loads</json:string><json:string>sensibility curve</json:string><json:string>norbert enkling</json:string><json:string>tactile perception</json:string><json:string>assistant professor</json:string><json:string>vice chair</json:string><json:string>contralateral side</json:string><json:string>medical dissertation</json:string><json:string>gender distribution</json:string><json:string>human subjects</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Norbert Enkling Dr. med. dent.</name><affiliations><json:string>Assistant professor and vice chair, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Switzerland;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: norbert.enkling@zmk.unibe.ch</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Stefan Heussner Dr. med. dent.</name><affiliations><json:string>assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Claudia Nicolay Dr. rer. nat.</name><affiliations><json:string>senior research fellow, Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Germany;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Stefan Bayer Dr. med. dent.</name><affiliations><json:string>assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Regina Mericske‐Stern Prof. Dr. med. dent.</name><affiliations><json:string>professor and chair, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Switzerland;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Karl‐Heinz Utz Prof. Dr. med. dent.</name><affiliations><json:string>associate professor and vice chair, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>active tactile sensibility of dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>interocclusal perception of teeth and implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osseoperception</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>single‐blinded randomized clinical split‐mouth trial</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>steepness of the sensibility curve</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>support area</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>tactile sensibility under anesthesia</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID252</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-40VZ7K3N-0</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Introduction and Aim: The term osseoperception describes the capability of developing a subtle tactile sensibility over dental implants. The present clinical study aims at clarifying the question of how far tactile sensibility is to be attributed to the periodontium of the natural opposing tooth of the implant.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.902</score><pdfWordCount>4338</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>27572</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>47</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>312</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>7</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Tactile Sensibility of Single‐Tooth Implants and Natural Teeth Under Local Anesthesia of the Natural Antagonistic Teeth</title><pmid><json:string>20030674</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>273</first><last>280</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>SAS Institute, Inc</json:string><json:string>University of Bonn</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Karl-Heinz Utz</json:string><json:string>Regina Mericske-Stern</json:string><json:string>Claudia Nicolay</json:string><json:string>Stefan Bayer</json:string><json:string>Dr</json:string><json:string>Stefan Heussner</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Bonn</json:string><json:string>Cuxhaven</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-40VZ7K3N-0</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00252.x</json:string></doi><id>BACCB443E81E40EA1AB17BC66BA2F5E3F4917BE1</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BACCB443E81E40EA1AB17BC66BA2F5E3F4917BE1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BACCB443E81E40EA1AB17BC66BA2F5E3F4917BE1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/BACCB443E81E40EA1AB17BC66BA2F5E3F4917BE1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Tactile Sensibility of Single‐Tooth Implants and Natural Teeth Under Local Anesthesia of the Natural Antagonistic Teeth</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Tactile Sensibility of Single‐Tooth Implants and Natural Teeth Under Local Anesthesia of the Natural Antagonistic Teeth</title><title level="a" type="short">Tactile Sensibility of Implants with Anesthetized Antagonists</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Norbert</forename><surname>Enkling</surname><roleName type="degree">Dr. med. dent.</roleName></persName><affiliation>Assistant professor and vice chair, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Switzerland;<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr. Norbert Enkling, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH‐3010 Bern, Germany; e‐mail: norbert.enkling@zmk.unibe.ch</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Stefan</forename><surname>Heussner</surname><roleName type="degree">Dr. med. dent.</roleName></persName><affiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany;<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Claudia</forename><surname>Nicolay</surname><roleName type="degree">Dr. rer. nat.</roleName></persName><affiliation>senior research fellow, Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Germany;<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Stefan</forename><surname>Bayer</surname><roleName type="degree">Dr. med. dent.</roleName></persName><affiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany;<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Regina</forename><surname>Mericske‐Stern</surname><roleName type="degree">Prof. Dr. med. dent.</roleName></persName><affiliation>professor and chair, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Switzerland;<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Karl‐Heinz</forename><surname>Utz</surname><roleName type="degree">Prof. Dr. med. dent.</roleName></persName><affiliation>associate professor and vice chair, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">BACCB443E81E40EA1AB17BC66BA2F5E3F4917BE1</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-40VZ7K3N-0</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00252.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID252</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID252.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="273">273</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="280">280</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Introduction and Aim:</hi> The term osseoperception describes the capability of developing a subtle tactile sensibility over dental implants. The present clinical study aims at clarifying the question of how far tactile sensibility is to be attributed to the periodontium of the natural opposing tooth of the implant.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and Method:</hi> Thirty‐two subjects with single‐tooth implants with natural opposing teeth were included in this clinical, single‐blind, split‐mouth study. The natural antagonistic tooth of the implant and the corresponding natural contralateral tooth were anesthetized with a locally infiltrated articaine anesthetic. In a computer‐assisted and randomized way, copper foils of varying thickness (0–100 µm) were placed interocclusally between the single‐tooth implant and the natural opposing tooth, and between the contralateral pair of natural opposing teeth in order to investigate the active tactile sensibility according to the psychophysical method of constant stimuli and evaluate it statistically by the Weibull distribution.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> The average tactile sensibility of the implants with anesthetized antagonists at the 50% value calculated by means of the Weibull distribution was 20 ± 11 µm with a support area (90%–10% value) of 77 ± 89 µm. For the pair of natural teeth, the tactile sensibility at the 50% value was 16 ± 9 µm with a support area of 48.4 ± 93 µm. This resulted in an average intraindividual difference of 3.5 ± 7 µm at the 50% value and 29 ± 93 µm in the support area. The statistical calculations demonstrated an equivalent tactile sensibility (50% value) of the single‐tooth implant and the contralateral natural control tooth with the natural antagonists being anesthetized in each case (double <hi rend="italic">t</hi>‐test, equivalence limit ± 8 µm, <hi rend="italic">P</hi> < 0.01, power >80%).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi> Apparently, the active tactile sensibility of single‐tooth implants with natural opposing teeth is not only to be attributed to the periodontium of the opposing tooth but also to a perception over the implant itself. This could support the hypothesis according to which the implant may have a tactile sensibility of its own.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">active tactile sensibility of dental implants</term><term xml:id="k2">interocclusal perception of teeth and implants</term><term xml:id="k3">osseoperception</term><term xml:id="k4">single‐blinded randomized clinical split‐mouth trial</term><term xml:id="k5">steepness of the sensibility curve</term><term xml:id="k6">support area</term><term xml:id="k7">tactile sensibility under anesthesia</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BACCB443E81E40EA1AB17BC66BA2F5E3F4917BE1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-04">April 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="13" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00252.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID252"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-12-17"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2009-12-17"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.3 standalone mode:FullText" date="2012-03-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-03-22"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="273">273</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="280">280</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr. Norbert Enkling, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH‐3010 Bern, Germany; e‐mail: <email>norbert.enkling@zmk.unibe.ch</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID252.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="54"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="4892"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Tactile Sensibility of Single‐Tooth Implants and Natural Teeth Under Local Anesthesia of the Natural Antagonistic Teeth</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2009</title><title type="short">Tactile Sensibility of Implants with Anesthetized Antagonists</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Norbert</givenNames><familyName>Enkling</familyName><degrees>Dr. med. dent.</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Stefan</givenNames><familyName>Heussner</familyName><degrees>Dr. med. dent.</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Claudia</givenNames><familyName>Nicolay</familyName><degrees>Dr. rer. nat.</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Stefan</givenNames><familyName>Bayer</familyName><degrees>Dr. med. dent.</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Regina</givenNames><familyName>Mericske‐Stern</familyName><degrees>Prof. Dr. med. dent.</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a5"><personName><givenNames>Karl‐Heinz</givenNames><familyName>Utz</familyName><degrees>Prof. Dr. med. dent.</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>Assistant professor and vice chair, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Switzerland;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>senior research fellow, Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Germany;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>professor and chair, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Switzerland;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>associate professor and vice chair, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">active tactile sensibility of dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">interocclusal perception of teeth and implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">osseoperception</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">single‐blinded randomized clinical split‐mouth trial</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">steepness of the sensibility curve</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">support area</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">tactile sensibility under anesthesia</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Introduction and Aim:</b> The term osseoperception describes the capability of developing a subtle tactile sensibility over dental implants. The present clinical study aims at clarifying the question of how far tactile sensibility is to be attributed to the periodontium of the natural opposing tooth of the implant.</p><p><b>Material and Method:</b> Thirty‐two subjects with single‐tooth implants with natural opposing teeth were included in this clinical, single‐blind, split‐mouth study. The natural antagonistic tooth of the implant and the corresponding natural contralateral tooth were anesthetized with a locally infiltrated articaine anesthetic. In a computer‐assisted and randomized way, copper foils of varying thickness (0–100 µm) were placed interocclusally between the single‐tooth implant and the natural opposing tooth, and between the contralateral pair of natural opposing teeth in order to investigate the active tactile sensibility according to the psychophysical method of constant stimuli and evaluate it statistically by the Weibull distribution.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The average tactile sensibility of the implants with anesthetized antagonists at the 50% value calculated by means of the Weibull distribution was 20 ± 11 µm with a support area (90%–10% value) of 77 ± 89 µm. For the pair of natural teeth, the tactile sensibility at the 50% value was 16 ± 9 µm with a support area of 48.4 ± 93 µm. This resulted in an average intraindividual difference of 3.5 ± 7 µm at the 50% value and 29 ± 93 µm in the support area. The statistical calculations demonstrated an equivalent tactile sensibility (50% value) of the single‐tooth implant and the contralateral natural control tooth with the natural antagonists being anesthetized in each case (double <i>t</i>‐test, equivalence limit ± 8 µm, <i>P</i> < 0.01, power >80%).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Apparently, the active tactile sensibility of single‐tooth implants with natural opposing teeth is not only to be attributed to the periodontium of the opposing tooth but also to a perception over the implant itself. This could support the hypothesis according to which the implant may have a tactile sensibility of its own.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Tactile Sensibility of Single‐Tooth Implants and Natural Teeth Under Local Anesthesia of the Natural Antagonistic Teeth</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Tactile Sensibility of Implants with Anesthetized Antagonists</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Tactile Sensibility of Single‐Tooth Implants and Natural Teeth Under Local Anesthesia of the Natural Antagonistic Teeth</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Norbert</namePart><namePart type="family">Enkling</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">Dr. med. dent.</namePart><affiliation>Assistant professor and vice chair, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Switzerland;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: norbert.enkling@zmk.unibe.ch</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stefan</namePart><namePart type="family">Heussner</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">Dr. med. dent.</namePart><affiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Claudia</namePart><namePart type="family">Nicolay</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">Dr. rer. nat.</namePart><affiliation>senior research fellow, Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Germany;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stefan</namePart><namePart type="family">Bayer</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">Dr. med. dent.</namePart><affiliation>assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Regina</namePart><namePart type="family">Mericske‐Stern</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">Prof. Dr. med. dent.</namePart><affiliation>professor and chair, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Switzerland;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Karl‐Heinz</namePart><namePart type="family">Utz</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">Prof. Dr. med. dent.</namePart><affiliation>associate professor and vice chair, Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials Science, University of Bonn, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-04</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">54</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">4892</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Introduction and Aim: The term osseoperception describes the capability of developing a subtle tactile sensibility over dental implants. The present clinical study aims at clarifying the question of how far tactile sensibility is to be attributed to the periodontium of the natural opposing tooth of the implant.</abstract><abstract>Material and Method: Thirty‐two subjects with single‐tooth implants with natural opposing teeth were included in this clinical, single‐blind, split‐mouth study. The natural antagonistic tooth of the implant and the corresponding natural contralateral tooth were anesthetized with a locally infiltrated articaine anesthetic. In a computer‐assisted and randomized way, copper foils of varying thickness (0–100 µm) were placed interocclusally between the single‐tooth implant and the natural opposing tooth, and between the contralateral pair of natural opposing teeth in order to investigate the active tactile sensibility according to the psychophysical method of constant stimuli and evaluate it statistically by the Weibull distribution.</abstract><abstract>Results: The average tactile sensibility of the implants with anesthetized antagonists at the 50% value calculated by means of the Weibull distribution was 20 ± 11 µm with a support area (90%–10% value) of 77 ± 89 µm. For the pair of natural teeth, the tactile sensibility at the 50% value was 16 ± 9 µm with a support area of 48.4 ± 93 µm. This resulted in an average intraindividual difference of 3.5 ± 7 µm at the 50% value and 29 ± 93 µm in the support area. The statistical calculations demonstrated an equivalent tactile sensibility (50% value) of the single‐tooth implant and the contralateral natural control tooth with the natural antagonists being anesthetized in each case (double t‐test, equivalence limit ± 8 µm, P < 0.01, power >80%).</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: Apparently, the active tactile sensibility of single‐tooth implants with natural opposing teeth is not only to be attributed to the periodontium of the opposing tooth but also to a perception over the implant itself. This could support the hypothesis according to which the implant may have a tactile sensibility of its own.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>active tactile sensibility of dental implants</topic><topic>interocclusal perception of teeth and implants</topic><topic>osseoperception</topic><topic>single‐blinded randomized clinical split‐mouth trial</topic><topic>steepness of the sensibility curve</topic><topic>support area</topic><topic>tactile sensibility under anesthesia</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>273</start><end>280</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">BACCB443E81E40EA1AB17BC66BA2F5E3F4917BE1</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-40VZ7K3N-0</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00252.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID252</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BACCB443E81E40EA1AB17BC66BA2F5E3F4917BE1/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005C99 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005C99 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:BACCB443E81E40EA1AB17BC66BA2F5E3F4917BE1
|texte= Tactile Sensibility of Single‐Tooth Implants and Natural Teeth Under Local Anesthesia of the Natural Antagonistic Teeth
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |