Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index – Rating Aesthetics of Single‐Implant Crowns and Adjacent Soft Tissues with Regard to Observer Dental Specialization
Identifieur interne : 005B43 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005B42; suivant : 005B44Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index – Rating Aesthetics of Single‐Implant Crowns and Adjacent Soft Tissues with Regard to Observer Dental Specialization
Auteurs : Peter Gehrke ; Marco Degidi ; Zitta Lulay-Saad ; Günter DhomSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2009-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adjacent teeth, Aesthetic outcome, Aesthetics, Anatomic shape, Anterior zone, Average score, Axial inclination, Chance agreement, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical procedures, Clinical quality, Consensus statements, Considerable agreement, Considerable discrepancies, Contralateral tooth, Conventional crown, Dent, Dent assoc, Dental implants, Dental restoration, Dental restorations, Dental specialization, Dental technicians, Dental technicians dentists, Dental technicians orthodontists, Dental technicians prosthodontists, Dentistry, Dentists orthodontists, Deviation deviation, General dentists, General guidelines, Gingival contour, High level, Immediate loading, Implant, Implant crown, Implant dent, Implant dentistry, Implant success, Incisal edge, Incisor zone, Individual criteria, Interexaminer agreement, Interexaminer reliability, Labial convexity, Labial mucosa, Least agreement, Lower score, Major deviation, Meijer, Mesiodistal dimension, Minimum agreement, Moderate agreement, Moderate intra, Moderate kappa, Objective assessment, Objective methods, Objective tool, Observer agreement, Occupational group, Occupational groups, Occupational groups kappa, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral surgeons, Orthodontist, Orthodontists dentists prosthodontists, Oversized, Particular interest, Patient satisfaction, Pilot study, Present study, Private practice, Prosthetic, Prosthetic complications, Prosthodontist, Prosthodontists dentists, Prosthodontists orthodontists, Rating, Rating figure, Rating implant aesthetics, Reproducibility, Ryge criteria, Second rating, Second ratings, Second ratings kappa, Single crowns, Slight deviation, Soft tissue, Statistical analysis, Surface characteristics, Surgeons dentists, Surgeons prosthodontists, Systematic review, Technician, Technicians surgeons, Total score, Transition point, Treatment outcome, Various parameters, Vertical position.
- Teeft :
- Adjacent teeth, Aesthetic outcome, Aesthetics, Anatomic shape, Anterior zone, Average score, Axial inclination, Chance agreement, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical procedures, Clinical quality, Consensus statements, Considerable agreement, Considerable discrepancies, Contralateral tooth, Conventional crown, Dent, Dent assoc, Dental implants, Dental restoration, Dental restorations, Dental specialization, Dental technicians, Dental technicians dentists, Dental technicians orthodontists, Dental technicians prosthodontists, Dentistry, Dentists orthodontists, Deviation deviation, General dentists, General guidelines, Gingival contour, High level, Immediate loading, Implant, Implant crown, Implant dent, Implant dentistry, Implant success, Incisal edge, Incisor zone, Individual criteria, Interexaminer agreement, Interexaminer reliability, Labial convexity, Labial mucosa, Least agreement, Lower score, Major deviation, Meijer, Mesiodistal dimension, Minimum agreement, Moderate agreement, Moderate intra, Moderate kappa, Objective assessment, Objective methods, Objective tool, Observer agreement, Occupational group, Occupational groups, Occupational groups kappa, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral surgeons, Orthodontist, Orthodontists dentists prosthodontists, Oversized, Particular interest, Patient satisfaction, Pilot study, Present study, Private practice, Prosthetic, Prosthetic complications, Prosthodontist, Prosthodontists dentists, Prosthodontists orthodontists, Rating, Rating figure, Rating implant aesthetics, Reproducibility, Ryge criteria, Second rating, Second ratings, Second ratings kappa, Single crowns, Slight deviation, Soft tissue, Statistical analysis, Surface characteristics, Surgeons dentists, Surgeons prosthodontists, Systematic review, Technician, Technicians surgeons, Total score, Transition point, Treatment outcome, Various parameters, Vertical position.
Abstract
Aim: The Implant Crown Aesthetic (ICA) Index evaluates the aesthetic outcome of implant‐supported single crowns in the anterior zone by awarding nine points for the shape, color, and surface characteristics of the crowns and surrounding soft tissue. The aim of this study was to measure the reproducibility of the ICA Index and assess the influence exerted by the examiner's degree of dental specialization.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00107.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:B77C6925DD92E114F021CAECEEA733507F7B6D5ELe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index – Rating Aesthetics of Single‐Implant Crowns and Adjacent Soft Tissues with Regard to Observer Dental Specialization</title><author><name sortKey="Gehrke, Peter" sort="Gehrke, Peter" uniqKey="Gehrke P" first="Peter" last="Gehrke">Peter Gehrke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Ludwigshafen, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: dr‐gehrke@prof‐dhom.de</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Degidi, Marco" sort="Degidi, Marco" uniqKey="Degidi M" first="Marco" last="Degidi">Marco Degidi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice, Bologna, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lulay Aad, Zitta" sort="Lulay Aad, Zitta" uniqKey="Lulay Aad Z" first="Zitta" last="Lulay-Saad">Zitta Lulay-Saad</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice, Ipsheim, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dhom, Gunter" sort="Dhom, Gunter" uniqKey="Dhom G" first="Günter" last="Dhom">Günter Dhom</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor of Management of Dental and Oral Medicine, Steinbeis‐University, Berlin, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B77C6925DD92E114F021CAECEEA733507F7B6D5E</idno><date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00107.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B77C6925DD92E114F021CAECEEA733507F7B6D5E/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005B43</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005B43</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index – Rating Aesthetics of Single‐Implant Crowns and Adjacent Soft Tissues with Regard to Observer Dental Specialization</title><author><name sortKey="Gehrke, Peter" sort="Gehrke, Peter" uniqKey="Gehrke P" first="Peter" last="Gehrke">Peter Gehrke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Ludwigshafen, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: dr‐gehrke@prof‐dhom.de</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Degidi, Marco" sort="Degidi, Marco" uniqKey="Degidi M" first="Marco" last="Degidi">Marco Degidi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice, Bologna, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lulay Aad, Zitta" sort="Lulay Aad, Zitta" uniqKey="Lulay Aad Z" first="Zitta" last="Lulay-Saad">Zitta Lulay-Saad</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice, Ipsheim, Germany;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dhom, Gunter" sort="Dhom, Gunter" uniqKey="Dhom G" first="Günter" last="Dhom">Günter Dhom</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor of Management of Dental and Oral Medicine, Steinbeis‐University, Berlin, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="201">201</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="213">213</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">13</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-09">2009-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adjacent teeth</term><term>Aesthetic outcome</term><term>Aesthetics</term><term>Anatomic shape</term><term>Anterior zone</term><term>Average score</term><term>Axial inclination</term><term>Chance agreement</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical procedures</term><term>Clinical quality</term><term>Consensus statements</term><term>Considerable agreement</term><term>Considerable discrepancies</term><term>Contralateral tooth</term><term>Conventional crown</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent assoc</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental restoration</term><term>Dental restorations</term><term>Dental specialization</term><term>Dental technicians</term><term>Dental technicians dentists</term><term>Dental technicians orthodontists</term><term>Dental technicians prosthodontists</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentists orthodontists</term><term>Deviation deviation</term><term>General dentists</term><term>General guidelines</term><term>Gingival contour</term><term>High level</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant crown</term><term>Implant dent</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Incisal edge</term><term>Incisor zone</term><term>Individual criteria</term><term>Interexaminer agreement</term><term>Interexaminer reliability</term><term>Labial convexity</term><term>Labial mucosa</term><term>Least agreement</term><term>Lower score</term><term>Major deviation</term><term>Meijer</term><term>Mesiodistal dimension</term><term>Minimum agreement</term><term>Moderate agreement</term><term>Moderate intra</term><term>Moderate kappa</term><term>Objective assessment</term><term>Objective methods</term><term>Objective tool</term><term>Observer agreement</term><term>Occupational group</term><term>Occupational groups</term><term>Occupational groups kappa</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral surgeons</term><term>Orthodontist</term><term>Orthodontists dentists prosthodontists</term><term>Oversized</term><term>Particular interest</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Present study</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic complications</term><term>Prosthodontist</term><term>Prosthodontists dentists</term><term>Prosthodontists orthodontists</term><term>Rating</term><term>Rating figure</term><term>Rating implant aesthetics</term><term>Reproducibility</term><term>Ryge criteria</term><term>Second rating</term><term>Second ratings</term><term>Second ratings kappa</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Slight deviation</term><term>Soft tissue</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Surface characteristics</term><term>Surgeons dentists</term><term>Surgeons prosthodontists</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Technician</term><term>Technicians surgeons</term><term>Total score</term><term>Transition point</term><term>Treatment outcome</term><term>Various parameters</term><term>Vertical position</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adjacent teeth</term><term>Aesthetic outcome</term><term>Aesthetics</term><term>Anatomic shape</term><term>Anterior zone</term><term>Average score</term><term>Axial inclination</term><term>Chance agreement</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical procedures</term><term>Clinical quality</term><term>Consensus statements</term><term>Considerable agreement</term><term>Considerable discrepancies</term><term>Contralateral tooth</term><term>Conventional crown</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent assoc</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental restoration</term><term>Dental restorations</term><term>Dental specialization</term><term>Dental technicians</term><term>Dental technicians dentists</term><term>Dental technicians orthodontists</term><term>Dental technicians prosthodontists</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentists orthodontists</term><term>Deviation deviation</term><term>General dentists</term><term>General guidelines</term><term>Gingival contour</term><term>High level</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant crown</term><term>Implant dent</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Incisal edge</term><term>Incisor zone</term><term>Individual criteria</term><term>Interexaminer agreement</term><term>Interexaminer reliability</term><term>Labial convexity</term><term>Labial mucosa</term><term>Least agreement</term><term>Lower score</term><term>Major deviation</term><term>Meijer</term><term>Mesiodistal dimension</term><term>Minimum agreement</term><term>Moderate agreement</term><term>Moderate intra</term><term>Moderate kappa</term><term>Objective assessment</term><term>Objective methods</term><term>Objective tool</term><term>Observer agreement</term><term>Occupational group</term><term>Occupational groups</term><term>Occupational groups kappa</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral surgeons</term><term>Orthodontist</term><term>Orthodontists dentists prosthodontists</term><term>Oversized</term><term>Particular interest</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Present study</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic complications</term><term>Prosthodontist</term><term>Prosthodontists dentists</term><term>Prosthodontists orthodontists</term><term>Rating</term><term>Rating figure</term><term>Rating implant aesthetics</term><term>Reproducibility</term><term>Ryge criteria</term><term>Second rating</term><term>Second ratings</term><term>Second ratings kappa</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Slight deviation</term><term>Soft tissue</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Surface characteristics</term><term>Surgeons dentists</term><term>Surgeons prosthodontists</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Technician</term><term>Technicians surgeons</term><term>Total score</term><term>Transition point</term><term>Treatment outcome</term><term>Various parameters</term><term>Vertical position</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Aim: The Implant Crown Aesthetic (ICA) Index evaluates the aesthetic outcome of implant‐supported single crowns in the anterior zone by awarding nine points for the shape, color, and surface characteristics of the crowns and surrounding soft tissue. The aim of this study was to measure the reproducibility of the ICA Index and assess the influence exerted by the examiner's degree of dental specialization.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>prosthodontist</json:string><json:string>implant crown</json:string><json:string>observer agreement</json:string><json:string>meijer</json:string><json:string>second ratings</json:string><json:string>aesthetics</json:string><json:string>soft tissue</json:string><json:string>aesthetic outcome</json:string><json:string>single crowns</json:string><json:string>occupational groups</json:string><json:string>reproducibility</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>technicians surgeons</json:string><json:string>mesiodistal dimension</json:string><json:string>orthodontists dentists prosthodontists</json:string><json:string>average score</json:string><json:string>oral surgeons</json:string><json:string>dental technicians</json:string><json:string>incisal edge</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>dental technicians prosthodontists</json:string><json:string>anatomic shape</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>dentists orthodontists</json:string><json:string>prosthodontists orthodontists</json:string><json:string>dental technicians orthodontists</json:string><json:string>surgeons dentists</json:string><json:string>prosthodontists dentists</json:string><json:string>dental technicians dentists</json:string><json:string>surgeons prosthodontists</json:string><json:string>objective methods</json:string><json:string>occupational group</json:string><json:string>implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>various parameters</json:string><json:string>dental restorations</json:string><json:string>transition point</json:string><json:string>moderate agreement</json:string><json:string>dental restoration</json:string><json:string>private practice</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>slight deviation</json:string><json:string>total score</json:string><json:string>considerable agreement</json:string><json:string>treatment outcome</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>rating</json:string><json:string>technician</json:string><json:string>moderate intra</json:string><json:string>interexaminer agreement</json:string><json:string>objective tool</json:string><json:string>labial convexity</json:string><json:string>rating implant aesthetics</json:string><json:string>major deviation</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>deviation deviation</json:string><json:string>statistical analysis</json:string><json:string>conventional crown</json:string><json:string>individual criteria</json:string><json:string>chance agreement</json:string><json:string>dental specialization</json:string><json:string>labial mucosa</json:string><json:string>lower score</json:string><json:string>high level</json:string><json:string>second rating</json:string><json:string>prosthetic complications</json:string><json:string>rating figure</json:string><json:string>implant success</json:string><json:string>interexaminer reliability</json:string><json:string>general dentists</json:string><json:string>anterior zone</json:string><json:string>surface characteristics</json:string><json:string>second ratings kappa</json:string><json:string>occupational groups kappa</json:string><json:string>clinical quality</json:string><json:string>consensus statements</json:string><json:string>clinical procedures</json:string><json:string>moderate kappa</json:string><json:string>general guidelines</json:string><json:string>particular interest</json:string><json:string>pilot study</json:string><json:string>minimum agreement</json:string><json:string>ryge criteria</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>axial inclination</json:string><json:string>considerable discrepancies</json:string><json:string>vertical position</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>incisor zone</json:string><json:string>gingival contour</json:string><json:string>least agreement</json:string><json:string>objective assessment</json:string><json:string>implant dent</json:string><json:string>contralateral tooth</json:string><json:string>dent assoc</json:string><json:string>adjacent teeth</json:string><json:string>oversized</json:string><json:string>orthodontist</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Peter Gehrke Dr Med Dent</name><affiliations><json:string>Private practice, Ludwigshafen, Germany;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: dr‐gehrke@prof‐dhom.de</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marco Degidi MD, DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>private practice, Bologna, Italy;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Zitta Lulay‐Saad Dr Med Stom</name><affiliations><json:string>private practice, Ipsheim, Germany;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Günter Dhom Prof Dr Med Dent</name><affiliations><json:string>professor of Management of Dental and Oral Medicine, Steinbeis‐University, Berlin, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>aesthetics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Implant Crown Aesthetic (ICA) Index</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐supported single‐tooth restoration</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implant soft tissue</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID107</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-95FVMZN4-Z</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Aim: The Implant Crown Aesthetic (ICA) Index evaluates the aesthetic outcome of implant‐supported single crowns in the anterior zone by awarding nine points for the shape, color, and surface characteristics of the crowns and surrounding soft tissue. The aim of this study was to measure the reproducibility of the ICA Index and assess the influence exerted by the examiner's degree of dental specialization.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.534</score><pdfWordCount>4778</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>33834</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>13</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>63</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>407</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index – Rating Aesthetics of Single‐Implant Crowns and Adjacent Soft Tissues with Regard to Observer Dental Specialization</title><pmid><json:string>18657148</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>201</first><last>213</last><total>13</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2009</json:string><json:string>2005</json:string><json:string>1999</json:string><json:string>1973</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>CDA</json:string><json:string>US Health Service Criteria</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Chang</json:string><json:string>Meijndert</json:string><json:string>Testori</json:string><json:string>Belser</json:string><json:string>Med Stom</json:string><json:string>Fürhauser</json:string><json:string>Peter Gehrke</json:string><json:string>Meijer</json:string><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>Med Dent</json:string><json:string>Marco Degidi</json:string><json:string>Günter Dhom</json:string><json:string>Engel</json:string><json:string>Pelka</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Ludwigshafen</json:string><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Heidelberg</json:string><json:string>Mannheim</json:string><json:string>Bologna</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>SPSS Inc., 2005</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-95FVMZN4-Z</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2009</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2009</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00107.x</json:string></doi><id>B77C6925DD92E114F021CAECEEA733507F7B6D5E</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B77C6925DD92E114F021CAECEEA733507F7B6D5E/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B77C6925DD92E114F021CAECEEA733507F7B6D5E/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B77C6925DD92E114F021CAECEEA733507F7B6D5E/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index – Rating Aesthetics of Single‐Implant Crowns and Adjacent Soft Tissues with Regard to Observer Dental Specialization</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2008, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2008, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2009-09"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index – Rating Aesthetics of Single‐Implant Crowns and Adjacent Soft Tissues with Regard to Observer Dental Specialization</title><title level="a" type="short">Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Peter</forename><surname>Gehrke</surname><roleName type="degree">Dr Med Dent</roleName></persName><affiliation>Private practice, Ludwigshafen, Germany;<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Peter Gehrke, Bismarckstrasse 27, 67059 Ludwigshafen, Germany; e‐mail: dr‐gehrke@prof‐dhom.de</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Marco</forename><surname>Degidi</surname><roleName type="degree">MD, DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>private practice, Bologna, Italy;<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Zitta</forename><surname>Lulay‐Saad</surname><roleName type="degree">Dr Med Stom</roleName></persName><affiliation>private practice, Ipsheim, Germany;<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Günter</forename><surname>Dhom</surname><roleName type="degree">Prof Dr Med Dent</roleName></persName><affiliation>professor of Management of Dental and Oral Medicine, Steinbeis‐University, Berlin, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">B77C6925DD92E114F021CAECEEA733507F7B6D5E</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-95FVMZN4-Z</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00107.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID107</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID107.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2009.11.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="201">201</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="213">213</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">13</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-09"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Aim:</hi> The Implant Crown Aesthetic (ICA) Index evaluates the aesthetic outcome of implant‐supported single crowns in the anterior zone by awarding nine points for the shape, color, and surface characteristics of the crowns and surrounding soft tissue. The aim of this study was to measure the reproducibility of the ICA Index and assess the influence exerted by the examiner's degree of dental specialization.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Ten examiners (two general dentists, two prosthodontists, two oral surgeons, two orthodontists, and two dental technicians) applied the ICA Index to 23 implant‐supported single crowns twice at an interval of 4 weeks. The inter‐ and intra‐examiner ratings were analyzed. Cohen's kappa (K) was used to measure the interexaminer reliability of estimations by two appraisers at a significance level of <hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .05.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> Within the various parameters, the observer agreement ranged 53 to 81%. All the examiners achieved moderate agreement between the first and second ratings, whereby Cohen's kappa was 0.49 (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .001). The most agreement was obtained by surgeons (K = 0.62, substantial) and the least by orthodontists (K = 0.24, sufficient). The lowest level of agreement with other occupational groups was manifested by the orthodontists (≤44.3%). The ICA Index produced a moderate Cohen's kappa of 0.42 and agreement amounting to 67% between the two ratings within the occupational groups. There was minimum agreement among the occupational groups (Cohen's K = 0.11–0.37, observer agreement: 40.2–66.3%); again, the least agreement was between the orthodontists and others.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions:</hi> The ICA Index resulted in poor to moderate intra‐ and interexaminer agreement. The validity and reproducibility of the ICA indexing as an objective tool in rating implant aesthetics is questionable.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">aesthetics</term><term xml:id="k2">Implant Crown Aesthetic (ICA) Index</term><term xml:id="k3">implant‐supported single‐tooth restoration</term><term xml:id="k4">peri‐implant soft tissue</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B77C6925DD92E114F021CAECEEA733507F7B6D5E/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2009.11.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="11">11</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2009-09">September 2009</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="5" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00107.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID107"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="13"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2008, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2008, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-07-24"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2009-08-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.4 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="201">201</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="213">213</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Peter Gehrke, Bismarckstrasse 27, 67059 Ludwigshafen, Germany; e‐mail: <email normalForm="dr-gehrke@prof-dhom.de">dr‐gehrke@prof‐dhom.de</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID107.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="11"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="38"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6774"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index – Rating Aesthetics of Single‐Implant Crowns and Adjacent Soft Tissues with Regard to Observer Dental Specialization</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2008</title><title type="short">Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Peter</givenNames><familyName>Gehrke</familyName><degrees>Dr Med Dent</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Marco</givenNames><familyName>Degidi</familyName><degrees>MD, DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Zitta</givenNames><familyName>Lulay‐Saad</familyName><degrees>Dr Med Stom</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Günter</givenNames><familyName>Dhom</familyName><degrees>Prof Dr Med Dent</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Private practice, Ludwigshafen, Germany;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>private practice, Bologna, Italy;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>private practice, Ipsheim, Germany;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>professor of Management of Dental and Oral Medicine, Steinbeis‐University, Berlin, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">aesthetics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">Implant Crown Aesthetic (ICA) Index</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">implant‐supported single‐tooth restoration</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">peri‐implant soft tissue</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Aim:</b> The Implant Crown Aesthetic (ICA) Index evaluates the aesthetic outcome of implant‐supported single crowns in the anterior zone by awarding nine points for the shape, color, and surface characteristics of the crowns and surrounding soft tissue. The aim of this study was to measure the reproducibility of the ICA Index and assess the influence exerted by the examiner's degree of dental specialization.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Ten examiners (two general dentists, two prosthodontists, two oral surgeons, two orthodontists, and two dental technicians) applied the ICA Index to 23 implant‐supported single crowns twice at an interval of 4 weeks. The inter‐ and intra‐examiner ratings were analyzed. Cohen's kappa (K) was used to measure the interexaminer reliability of estimations by two appraisers at a significance level of <i>p</i> < .05.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Within the various parameters, the observer agreement ranged 53 to 81%. All the examiners achieved moderate agreement between the first and second ratings, whereby Cohen's kappa was 0.49 (<i>p</i> < .001). The most agreement was obtained by surgeons (K = 0.62, substantial) and the least by orthodontists (K = 0.24, sufficient). The lowest level of agreement with other occupational groups was manifested by the orthodontists (≤44.3%). The ICA Index produced a moderate Cohen's kappa of 0.42 and agreement amounting to 67% between the two ratings within the occupational groups. There was minimum agreement among the occupational groups (Cohen's K = 0.11–0.37, observer agreement: 40.2–66.3%); again, the least agreement was between the orthodontists and others.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The ICA Index resulted in poor to moderate intra‐ and interexaminer agreement. The validity and reproducibility of the ICA indexing as an objective tool in rating implant aesthetics is questionable.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index – Rating Aesthetics of Single‐Implant Crowns and Adjacent Soft Tissues with Regard to Observer Dental Specialization</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index – Rating Aesthetics of Single‐Implant Crowns and Adjacent Soft Tissues with Regard to Observer Dental Specialization</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Peter</namePart><namePart type="family">Gehrke</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">Dr Med Dent</namePart><affiliation>Private practice, Ludwigshafen, Germany;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: dr‐gehrke@prof‐dhom.de</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marco</namePart><namePart type="family">Degidi</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD, DDS</namePart><affiliation>private practice, Bologna, Italy;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Zitta</namePart><namePart type="family">Lulay‐Saad</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">Dr Med Stom</namePart><affiliation>private practice, Ipsheim, Germany;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Günter</namePart><namePart type="family">Dhom</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">Prof Dr Med Dent</namePart><affiliation>professor of Management of Dental and Oral Medicine, Steinbeis‐University, Berlin, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2009-09</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2009</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">6</extent><extent unit="tables">11</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">38</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">6774</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Aim: The Implant Crown Aesthetic (ICA) Index evaluates the aesthetic outcome of implant‐supported single crowns in the anterior zone by awarding nine points for the shape, color, and surface characteristics of the crowns and surrounding soft tissue. The aim of this study was to measure the reproducibility of the ICA Index and assess the influence exerted by the examiner's degree of dental specialization.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Ten examiners (two general dentists, two prosthodontists, two oral surgeons, two orthodontists, and two dental technicians) applied the ICA Index to 23 implant‐supported single crowns twice at an interval of 4 weeks. The inter‐ and intra‐examiner ratings were analyzed. Cohen's kappa (K) was used to measure the interexaminer reliability of estimations by two appraisers at a significance level of p < .05.</abstract><abstract>Results: Within the various parameters, the observer agreement ranged 53 to 81%. All the examiners achieved moderate agreement between the first and second ratings, whereby Cohen's kappa was 0.49 (p < .001). The most agreement was obtained by surgeons (K = 0.62, substantial) and the least by orthodontists (K = 0.24, sufficient). The lowest level of agreement with other occupational groups was manifested by the orthodontists (≤44.3%). The ICA Index produced a moderate Cohen's kappa of 0.42 and agreement amounting to 67% between the two ratings within the occupational groups. There was minimum agreement among the occupational groups (Cohen's K = 0.11–0.37, observer agreement: 40.2–66.3%); again, the least agreement was between the orthodontists and others.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: The ICA Index resulted in poor to moderate intra‐ and interexaminer agreement. The validity and reproducibility of the ICA indexing as an objective tool in rating implant aesthetics is questionable.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>aesthetics</topic><topic>Implant Crown Aesthetic (ICA) Index</topic><topic>implant‐supported single‐tooth restoration</topic><topic>peri‐implant soft tissue</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2009</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>11</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>201</start><end>213</end><total>13</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">B77C6925DD92E114F021CAECEEA733507F7B6D5E</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-95FVMZN4-Z</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00107.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID107</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2008, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2008, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B77C6925DD92E114F021CAECEEA733507F7B6D5E/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005B43 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005B43 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:B77C6925DD92E114F021CAECEEA733507F7B6D5E
|texte= Reproducibility of the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index – Rating Aesthetics of Single‐Implant Crowns and Adjacent Soft Tissues with Regard to Observer Dental Specialization
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |