Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Biologic and Mechanical Stability of Single‐Tooth Implants:4‐ to 7‐Year Follow‐up

Identifieur interne : 005991 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005990; suivant : 005992

Biologic and Mechanical Stability of Single‐Tooth Implants:4‐ to 7‐Year Follow‐up

Auteurs : Michael R. Norton

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:B4346C02AFB1365574815ACF3F06938A43E2BE65

English descriptors

Abstract

Background: Single‐tooth implants have been reported to achieve a high level of surgical and prosthetic success. However, close inspection of the literature reveals a paucity of data on the follow‐up of single‐tooth implants in function for 5 years or more. Since unsplinted implants may be considered to be subject to greater functional stresses, there is a need to report on the long‐term biologic and mechanical integrity of such implant‐supported restorations. Purpose: To report on the long‐term follow‐up of single‐tooth implants, restored and in function for 4 to 7 years. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐seven Astra Tech single‐tooth implants were subject to a clinical audit to evaluate implant and prosthetic success as well as response of both hard and soft tissues over a 1‐ to 4‐year follow‐up. This current report presents data on the biologic and mechanical integrity of 23 of these single‐tooth implants, which have been in function for up to 7 years (mean, 63 mo). Data are provided with respect to implant survival, maintenance of marginal bone levels, soft‐tissue health, and the recording of any adverse events, including prosthetic complications. Results: Only 14 implants in 13 patients were available for review, with no failures for this group of implants. One patient from the original group, who was lost to follow‐up, was known to have suffered an implant failure. Furthermore, in accordance with established criteria, the remaining 13 implants that are not included in this report must at this time also be considered as potential failures. As such, the best‐case scenario would be a 95.6% success rate for the 23 implants included in this review and the worst‐case scenario would be a 60.8% success rate. Mean marginal bone loss measured 0.49 mm mesially and 0.76 mm distally, with a frequency of bone loss of 50%. Soft tissues were clinically healthy. There were few adverse events, with only one case of abutment screw loosening, detected at the 6‐year review. In addition, crown decementation was recorded three times in two patients. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the Astra Tech single‐tooth implant can achieve long‐term biologic and mechanical stability when used to restore single missing teeth, over the long‐term.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00143.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:B4346C02AFB1365574815ACF3F06938A43E2BE65

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Biologic and Mechanical Stability of Single‐Tooth Implants:4‐ to 7‐Year Follow‐up</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Norton, Michael R" sort="Norton, Michael R" uniqKey="Norton M" first="Michael R." last="Norton">Michael R. Norton</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Specialist in Surgical Dentistry, Honorary Associate Specialist, Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London and Bedford Hospital, Bedford, UK</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: drnorton@nortonimplants.co.uk</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B4346C02AFB1365574815ACF3F06938A43E2BE65</idno>
<date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00143.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B4346C02AFB1365574815ACF3F06938A43E2BE65/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005991</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005991</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Biologic and Mechanical Stability of Single‐Tooth Implants:4‐ to 7‐Year Follow‐up</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Norton, Michael R" sort="Norton, Michael R" uniqKey="Norton M" first="Michael R." last="Norton">Michael R. Norton</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Specialist in Surgical Dentistry, Honorary Associate Specialist, Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London and Bedford Hospital, Bedford, UK</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: drnorton@nortonimplants.co.uk</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="214">214</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="220">220</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2001-10">2001-10</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment screw</term>
<term>Adverse events</term>
<term>Astra</term>
<term>Astra tech</term>
<term>Astra tech implant</term>
<term>Bone level</term>
<term>Bone levels</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Brinemark implants</term>
<term>Central incisor</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Clinical studies</term>
<term>Common complication</term>
<term>Conical</term>
<term>Conical collar</term>
<term>Crown decementation</term>
<term>Early cases</term>
<term>High level</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant design</term>
<term>Implant system</term>
<term>Internal cone</term>
<term>Internal conical interface</term>
<term>Loose abutment screw</term>
<term>Many times</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone levels</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Mechanical integrity</term>
<term>Mechanical stability</term>
<term>Mesially</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Original group</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Prosthetic success</term>
<term>Recent study</term>
<term>Reference level</term>
<term>Reference point</term>
<term>Regular basis</term>
<term>Review appointment</term>
<term>Rough surface</term>
<term>Simple questionnaire</term>
<term>Soft tissues</term>
<term>Success rate</term>
<term>Survival rate</term>
<term>Torque driver</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment screw</term>
<term>Adverse events</term>
<term>Astra</term>
<term>Astra tech</term>
<term>Astra tech implant</term>
<term>Bone level</term>
<term>Bone levels</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Brinemark implants</term>
<term>Central incisor</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Clinical studies</term>
<term>Common complication</term>
<term>Conical</term>
<term>Conical collar</term>
<term>Crown decementation</term>
<term>Early cases</term>
<term>High level</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant design</term>
<term>Implant system</term>
<term>Internal cone</term>
<term>Internal conical interface</term>
<term>Loose abutment screw</term>
<term>Many times</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone levels</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Mechanical integrity</term>
<term>Mechanical stability</term>
<term>Mesially</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Original group</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Prosthetic success</term>
<term>Recent study</term>
<term>Reference level</term>
<term>Reference point</term>
<term>Regular basis</term>
<term>Review appointment</term>
<term>Rough surface</term>
<term>Simple questionnaire</term>
<term>Soft tissues</term>
<term>Success rate</term>
<term>Survival rate</term>
<term>Torque driver</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Single‐tooth implants have been reported to achieve a high level of surgical and prosthetic success. However, close inspection of the literature reveals a paucity of data on the follow‐up of single‐tooth implants in function for 5 years or more. Since unsplinted implants may be considered to be subject to greater functional stresses, there is a need to report on the long‐term biologic and mechanical integrity of such implant‐supported restorations. Purpose: To report on the long‐term follow‐up of single‐tooth implants, restored and in function for 4 to 7 years. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐seven Astra Tech single‐tooth implants were subject to a clinical audit to evaluate implant and prosthetic success as well as response of both hard and soft tissues over a 1‐ to 4‐year follow‐up. This current report presents data on the biologic and mechanical integrity of 23 of these single‐tooth implants, which have been in function for up to 7 years (mean, 63 mo). Data are provided with respect to implant survival, maintenance of marginal bone levels, soft‐tissue health, and the recording of any adverse events, including prosthetic complications. Results: Only 14 implants in 13 patients were available for review, with no failures for this group of implants. One patient from the original group, who was lost to follow‐up, was known to have suffered an implant failure. Furthermore, in accordance with established criteria, the remaining 13 implants that are not included in this report must at this time also be considered as potential failures. As such, the best‐case scenario would be a 95.6% success rate for the 23 implants included in this review and the worst‐case scenario would be a 60.8% success rate. Mean marginal bone loss measured 0.49 mm mesially and 0.76 mm distally, with a frequency of bone loss of 50%. Soft tissues were clinically healthy. There were few adverse events, with only one case of abutment screw loosening, detected at the 6‐year review. In addition, crown decementation was recorded three times in two patients. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the Astra Tech single‐tooth implant can achieve long‐term biologic and mechanical stability when used to restore single missing teeth, over the long‐term.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords>
<teeft>
<json:string>implant</json:string>
<json:string>abutment</json:string>
<json:string>bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>clin</json:string>
<json:string>conical</json:string>
<json:string>abutment screw</json:string>
<json:string>astra tech</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone levels</json:string>
<json:string>astra</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>mesially</json:string>
<json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string>
<json:string>torque driver</json:string>
<json:string>adverse events</json:string>
<json:string>soft tissues</json:string>
<json:string>reference point</json:string>
<json:string>implant design</json:string>
<json:string>bone levels</json:string>
<json:string>survival rate</json:string>
<json:string>many times</json:string>
<json:string>success rate</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string>
<json:string>review appointment</json:string>
<json:string>internal conical interface</json:string>
<json:string>original group</json:string>
<json:string>regular basis</json:string>
<json:string>simple questionnaire</json:string>
<json:string>mechanical stability</json:string>
<json:string>implant system</json:string>
<json:string>crown decementation</json:string>
<json:string>bone level</json:string>
<json:string>astra tech implant</json:string>
<json:string>central incisor</json:string>
<json:string>loose abutment screw</json:string>
<json:string>high level</json:string>
<json:string>common complication</json:string>
<json:string>early cases</json:string>
<json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic success</json:string>
<json:string>internal cone</json:string>
<json:string>clinical studies</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone level</json:string>
<json:string>reference level</json:string>
<json:string>recent study</json:string>
<json:string>mechanical integrity</json:string>
<json:string>conical collar</json:string>
<json:string>rough surface</json:string>
<json:string>brinemark implants</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Michael R. Norton BDS</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Specialist in Surgical Dentistry, Honorary Associate Specialist, Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London and Bedford Hospital, Bedford, UK</json:string>
<json:string>E-mail: drnorton@nortonimplants.co.uk</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>abutment screw</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Astra Tech</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>marginal bone loss</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>microroughness</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>microthread</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>single‐tooth implants</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId>
<json:string>CID214</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-G6DXWL9T-8</arkIstex>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Background: Single‐tooth implants have been reported to achieve a high level of surgical and prosthetic success. However, close inspection of the literature reveals a paucity of data on the follow‐up of single‐tooth implants in function for 5 years or more. Since unsplinted implants may be considered to be subject to greater functional stresses, there is a need to report on the long‐term biologic and mechanical integrity of such implant‐supported restorations. Purpose: To report on the long‐term follow‐up of single‐tooth implants, restored and in function for 4 to 7 years. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐seven Astra Tech single‐tooth implants were subject to a clinical audit to evaluate implant and prosthetic success as well as response of both hard and soft tissues over a 1‐ to 4‐year follow‐up. This current report presents data on the biologic and mechanical integrity of 23 of these single‐tooth implants, which have been in function for up to 7 years (mean, 63 mo). Data are provided with respect to implant survival, maintenance of marginal bone levels, soft‐tissue health, and the recording of any adverse events, including prosthetic complications. Results: Only 14 implants in 13 patients were available for review, with no failures for this group of implants. One patient from the original group, who was lost to follow‐up, was known to have suffered an implant failure. Furthermore, in accordance with established criteria, the remaining 13 implants that are not included in this report must at this time also be considered as potential failures. As such, the best‐case scenario would be a 95.6% success rate for the 23 implants included in this review and the worst‐case scenario would be a 60.8% success rate. Mean marginal bone loss measured 0.49 mm mesially and 0.76 mm distally, with a frequency of bone loss of 50%. Soft tissues were clinically healthy. There were few adverse events, with only one case of abutment screw loosening, detected at the 6‐year review. In addition, crown decementation was recorded three times in two patients. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the Astra Tech single‐tooth implant can achieve long‐term biologic and mechanical stability when used to restore single missing teeth, over the long‐term.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>8.967</score>
<pdfWordCount>3967</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>23378</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>576 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>356</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>2257</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>6</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Biologic and Mechanical Stability of Single‐Tooth Implants:4‐ to 7‐Year Follow‐up</title>
<pmid>
<json:string>11887658</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string>
</doi>
<issn>
<json:string>1523-0899</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn>
<json:string>1708-8208</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId>
<json:string>CID</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>3</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<pages>
<first>214</first>
<last>220</last>
<total>7</total>
</pages>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities>
<unitex>
<date>
<json:string>2000</json:string>
<json:string>1997</json:string>
<json:string>2001</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName>
<json:string>BC Decker Inc</json:string>
<json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string>
<json:string>Kerr Manufacturing Co.</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName>
<json:string>Michael R. Norton</json:string>
<json:string>Patient</json:string>
<json:string>Data</json:string>
<json:string>For</json:string>
<json:string>Athena Nordic</json:string>
<json:string>To</json:string>
<json:string>Harley Street</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName>
<json:string>UK</json:string>
<json:string>Stockholm</json:string>
<json:string>Sweden</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl></ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark>
<json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-G6DXWL9T-8</json:string>
</ark>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix>
<json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus>
<json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string>
</scopus>
<inist>
<json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string>
<json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string>
<json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2001</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2001</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00143.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>B4346C02AFB1365574815ACF3F06938A43E2BE65</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B4346C02AFB1365574815ACF3F06938A43E2BE65/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B4346C02AFB1365574815ACF3F06938A43E2BE65/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B4346C02AFB1365574815ACF3F06938A43E2BE65/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main">Biologic and Mechanical Stability of Single‐Tooth Implants:4‐ to 7‐Year Follow‐up</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2001-10"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="article">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Biologic and Mechanical Stability of Single‐Tooth Implants:4‐ to 7‐Year Follow‐up</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Michael R.</forename>
<surname>Norton</surname>
<roleName type="degree">BDS</roleName>
</persName>
<affiliation>Specialist in Surgical Dentistry, Honorary Associate Specialist, Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London and Bedford Hospital, Bedford, UK
<address>
<country key="GB"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>Reprint requests: Michael R. Norton, BDS, 98 Harley Street, London WIG 7HZ, UK; e‐mail: drnorton@nortonimplants.co.uk</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">B4346C02AFB1365574815ACF3F06938A43E2BE65</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-G6DXWL9T-8</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00143.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">CID214</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID214.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2001.3.issue-4</idno>
<idno type="product">CID</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="214">214</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="220">220</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2001-10"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<abstract xml:lang="en" style="main">
<head>ABSTRACT</head>
<p>
<hi rend="italic">Background</hi>
: Single‐tooth implants have been reported to achieve a high level of surgical and prosthetic success. However, close inspection of the literature reveals a paucity of data on the follow‐up of single‐tooth implants in function for 5 years or more. Since unsplinted implants may be considered to be subject to greater functional stresses, there is a need to report on the long‐term biologic and mechanical integrity of such implant‐supported restorations.</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italic">Purpose</hi>
: To report on the long‐term follow‐up of single‐tooth implants, restored and in function for 4 to 7 years.</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italic">Materials and Methods</hi>
: Twenty‐seven Astra Tech single‐tooth implants were subject to a clinical audit to evaluate implant and prosthetic success as well as response of both hard and soft tissues over a 1‐ to 4‐year follow‐up. This current report presents data on the biologic and mechanical integrity of 23 of these single‐tooth implants, which have been in function for up to 7 years (mean, 63 mo). Data are provided with respect to implant survival, maintenance of marginal bone levels, soft‐tissue health, and the recording of any adverse events, including prosthetic complications.</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italic">Results</hi>
: Only 14 implants in 13 patients were available for review, with no failures for this group of implants. One patient from the original group, who was lost to follow‐up, was known to have suffered an implant failure. Furthermore, in accordance with established criteria, the remaining 13 implants that are not included in this report must at this time also be considered as potential failures. As such, the best‐case scenario would be a 95.6% success rate for the 23 implants included in this review and the worst‐case scenario would be a 60.8% success rate. Mean marginal bone loss measured 0.49 mm mesially and 0.76 mm distally, with a frequency of bone loss of 50%. Soft tissues were clinically healthy. There were few adverse events, with only one case of abutment screw loosening, detected at the 6‐year review. In addition, crown decementation was recorded three times in two patients.</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italic">Conclusions</hi>
: It can be concluded that the Astra Tech single‐tooth implant can achieve long‐term biologic and mechanical stability when used to restore single missing teeth, over the long‐term.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords xml:lang="en">
<term xml:id="k1">abutment screw</term>
<term xml:id="k2">Astra Tech</term>
<term xml:id="k3">marginal bone loss</term>
<term xml:id="k4">microroughness</term>
<term xml:id="k5">microthread</term>
<term xml:id="k6">single‐tooth implants</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B4346C02AFB1365574815ACF3F06938A43E2BE65/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document>
<component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en">
<header>
<publicationMeta level="product">
<publisherInfo>
<publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi>
<issn type="print">1523-0899</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn>
<idGroup>
<id type="product" value="CID"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="10004">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2001.3.issue-4</doi>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="journalVolume" number="3">3</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2001-10">October 2001</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0021400" status="forIssue">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00143.x</doi>
<idGroup>
<id type="unit" value="CID214"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup>
<count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count>
</countGroup>
<eventGroup>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2007-02-01"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-02-01"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-13"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="pageFirst" number="214">214</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="220">220</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo>Reprint requests: Michael R. Norton, BDS, 98 Harley Street, London WIG 7HZ, UK; e‐mail:
<email>drnorton@nortonimplants.co.uk</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup>
<link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID214.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta>
<countGroup>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="24"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="2"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main">Biologic and Mechanical Stability of Single‐Tooth Implants:4‐ to 7‐Year Follow‐up</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes">
<personName>
<givenNames>Michael R.</givenNames>
<familyName>Norton</familyName>
<degrees>BDS</degrees>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup>
<affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="GB">
<unparsedAffiliation>Specialist in Surgical Dentistry, Honorary Associate Specialist, Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London and Bedford Hospital, Bedford, UK</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en">
<keyword xml:id="k1">abutment screw</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">Astra Tech</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">marginal bone loss</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k4">microroughness</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k5">microthread</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k6">single‐tooth implants</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup>
<abstract type="main" xml:lang="en">
<title type="main">ABSTRACT</title>
<p>
<i>Background</i>
: Single‐tooth implants have been reported to achieve a high level of surgical and prosthetic success. However, close inspection of the literature reveals a paucity of data on the follow‐up of single‐tooth implants in function for 5 years or more. Since unsplinted implants may be considered to be subject to greater functional stresses, there is a need to report on the long‐term biologic and mechanical integrity of such implant‐supported restorations.</p>
<p>
<i>Purpose</i>
: To report on the long‐term follow‐up of single‐tooth implants, restored and in function for 4 to 7 years.</p>
<p>
<i>Materials and Methods</i>
: Twenty‐seven Astra Tech single‐tooth implants were subject to a clinical audit to evaluate implant and prosthetic success as well as response of both hard and soft tissues over a 1‐ to 4‐year follow‐up. This current report presents data on the biologic and mechanical integrity of 23 of these single‐tooth implants, which have been in function for up to 7 years (mean, 63 mo). Data are provided with respect to implant survival, maintenance of marginal bone levels, soft‐tissue health, and the recording of any adverse events, including prosthetic complications.</p>
<p>
<i>Results</i>
: Only 14 implants in 13 patients were available for review, with no failures for this group of implants. One patient from the original group, who was lost to follow‐up, was known to have suffered an implant failure. Furthermore, in accordance with established criteria, the remaining 13 implants that are not included in this report must at this time also be considered as potential failures. As such, the best‐case scenario would be a 95.6% success rate for the 23 implants included in this review and the worst‐case scenario would be a 60.8% success rate. Mean marginal bone loss measured 0.49 mm mesially and 0.76 mm distally, with a frequency of bone loss of 50%. Soft tissues were clinically healthy. There were few adverse events, with only one case of abutment screw loosening, detected at the 6‐year review. In addition, crown decementation was recorded three times in two patients.</p>
<p>
<i>Conclusions</i>
: It can be concluded that the Astra Tech single‐tooth implant can achieve long‐term biologic and mechanical stability when used to restore single missing teeth, over the long‐term.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Biologic and Mechanical Stability of Single‐Tooth Implants:4‐ to 7‐Year Follow‐up</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en">
<title>Biologic and Mechanical Stability of Single‐Tooth Implants:4‐ to 7‐Year Follow‐up</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Michael R.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Norton</namePart>
<namePart type="termsOfAddress">BDS</namePart>
<affiliation>Specialist in Surgical Dentistry, Honorary Associate Specialist, Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London and Bedford Hospital, Bedford, UK</affiliation>
<affiliation>E-mail: drnorton@nortonimplants.co.uk</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-10</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<extent unit="references">24</extent>
<extent unit="linksCrossRef">2</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">Background: Single‐tooth implants have been reported to achieve a high level of surgical and prosthetic success. However, close inspection of the literature reveals a paucity of data on the follow‐up of single‐tooth implants in function for 5 years or more. Since unsplinted implants may be considered to be subject to greater functional stresses, there is a need to report on the long‐term biologic and mechanical integrity of such implant‐supported restorations. Purpose: To report on the long‐term follow‐up of single‐tooth implants, restored and in function for 4 to 7 years. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐seven Astra Tech single‐tooth implants were subject to a clinical audit to evaluate implant and prosthetic success as well as response of both hard and soft tissues over a 1‐ to 4‐year follow‐up. This current report presents data on the biologic and mechanical integrity of 23 of these single‐tooth implants, which have been in function for up to 7 years (mean, 63 mo). Data are provided with respect to implant survival, maintenance of marginal bone levels, soft‐tissue health, and the recording of any adverse events, including prosthetic complications. Results: Only 14 implants in 13 patients were available for review, with no failures for this group of implants. One patient from the original group, who was lost to follow‐up, was known to have suffered an implant failure. Furthermore, in accordance with established criteria, the remaining 13 implants that are not included in this report must at this time also be considered as potential failures. As such, the best‐case scenario would be a 95.6% success rate for the 23 implants included in this review and the worst‐case scenario would be a 60.8% success rate. Mean marginal bone loss measured 0.49 mm mesially and 0.76 mm distally, with a frequency of bone loss of 50%. Soft tissues were clinically healthy. There were few adverse events, with only one case of abutment screw loosening, detected at the 6‐year review. In addition, crown decementation was recorded three times in two patients. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the Astra Tech single‐tooth implant can achieve long‐term biologic and mechanical stability when used to restore single missing teeth, over the long‐term.</abstract>
<subject lang="en">
<genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>abutment screw</topic>
<topic>Astra Tech</topic>
<topic>marginal bone loss</topic>
<topic>microroughness</topic>
<topic>microthread</topic>
<topic>single‐tooth implants</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier>
<part>
<date>2001</date>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<caption>no.</caption>
<number>4</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>214</start>
<end>220</end>
<total>7</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">B4346C02AFB1365574815ACF3F06938A43E2BE65</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-G6DXWL9T-8</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00143.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">CID214</identifier>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B4346C02AFB1365574815ACF3F06938A43E2BE65/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005991 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005991 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:B4346C02AFB1365574815ACF3F06938A43E2BE65
   |texte=   Biologic and Mechanical Stability of Single‐Tooth Implants:4‐ to 7‐Year Follow‐up
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022