EdenteV2, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 005945

Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study

Identifieur interne : 005945 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005944; suivant : 005946

Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study

Auteurs : S. Heberer ; D. Hildebrand ; K. Nelson

Source :

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2011-06.

RBID : ISTEX:B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4

English descriptors

Abstract

Summary The aim of this present study was to evaluate the success of immediately loaded transitional implants and to identify possible influential factors. A total of 64 patients were recruited in a private specialist implant practice. Two different implant systems were evaluated (IPI, Nobel Biocare, Sweden; I‐Plant, Unor, Switzerland). Primary stability, survival rate, gender, location, the type of prosthetic restoration and the tooth status of the opposite jaw were analysed using Kaplan–Meier or Pearson Chi‐Square test. A total of 254 transitional implants were placed, thereof 216 were IPI implants and 38 I‐Plant implants. The overall observation period ranged between 2 and 426 days. The results demonstrated a survival rate of 82·4% for the IPI system and 84·2% for the I‐Plant system. None of the transitional implants with a good primary stability were lost during the observation period. The primary stability showed significant influence on the implant survival. There was no significant difference in survival of the implants between the two implant systems. Neither the gender, the kind of superstructure, the location of the implant, the tooth status of the opposing jaw or the immediate prosthetic superstructure had an influence on the survival of the implants. Both implant systems proved to be sufficient alternatives for the support of provisional restorations.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02166.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Heberer, S" sort="Heberer, S" uniqKey="Heberer S" first="S." last="Heberer">S. Heberer</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité‐Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hildebrand, D" sort="Hildebrand, D" uniqKey="Hildebrand D" first="D." last="Hildebrand">D. Hildebrand</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental Practice, Berlin, Germany</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Nelson, K" sort="Nelson, K" uniqKey="Nelson K" first="K." last="Nelson">K. Nelson</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité‐Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4</idno>
<date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02166.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005945</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005945</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Heberer, S" sort="Heberer, S" uniqKey="Heberer S" first="S." last="Heberer">S. Heberer</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité‐Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hildebrand, D" sort="Hildebrand, D" uniqKey="Hildebrand D" first="D." last="Hildebrand">D. Hildebrand</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental Practice, Berlin, Germany</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Nelson, K" sort="Nelson, K" uniqKey="Nelson K" first="K." last="Nelson">K. Nelson</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité‐Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">38</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="447">447</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="453">453</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2011-06">2011-06</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Augmentation</term>
<term>Augmentation procedures</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bone quality</term>
<term>Case reports</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous jaws</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Failure rate</term>
<term>Healing period</term>
<term>Healing time</term>
<term>Immediate loading</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant stability</term>
<term>Implant survival</term>
<term>Implant systems</term>
<term>Insertion</term>
<term>Krennmair</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Medium stability</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Primary stability</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic restoration</term>
<term>Provisional restorations</term>
<term>Removable</term>
<term>Screw design</term>
<term>Survival rate</term>
<term>Titanium</term>
<term>Titanium alloy</term>
<term>Titanium implants</term>
<term>Tooth status</term>
<term>Transitional</term>
<term>Transitional implant</term>
<term>Transitional implant systems</term>
<term>Transitional implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Augmentation</term>
<term>Augmentation procedures</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bone quality</term>
<term>Case reports</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous jaws</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Failure rate</term>
<term>Healing period</term>
<term>Healing time</term>
<term>Immediate loading</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant stability</term>
<term>Implant survival</term>
<term>Implant systems</term>
<term>Insertion</term>
<term>Krennmair</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Medium stability</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Primary stability</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic restoration</term>
<term>Provisional restorations</term>
<term>Removable</term>
<term>Screw design</term>
<term>Survival rate</term>
<term>Titanium</term>
<term>Titanium alloy</term>
<term>Titanium implants</term>
<term>Tooth status</term>
<term>Transitional</term>
<term>Transitional implant</term>
<term>Transitional implant systems</term>
<term>Transitional implants</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Summary  The aim of this present study was to evaluate the success of immediately loaded transitional implants and to identify possible influential factors. A total of 64 patients were recruited in a private specialist implant practice. Two different implant systems were evaluated (IPI, Nobel Biocare, Sweden; I‐Plant, Unor, Switzerland). Primary stability, survival rate, gender, location, the type of prosthetic restoration and the tooth status of the opposite jaw were analysed using Kaplan–Meier or Pearson Chi‐Square test. A total of 254 transitional implants were placed, thereof 216 were IPI implants and 38 I‐Plant implants. The overall observation period ranged between 2 and 426 days. The results demonstrated a survival rate of 82·4% for the IPI system and 84·2% for the I‐Plant system. None of the transitional implants with a good primary stability were lost during the observation period. The primary stability showed significant influence on the implant survival. There was no significant difference in survival of the implants between the two implant systems. Neither the gender, the kind of superstructure, the location of the implant, the tooth status of the opposing jaw or the immediate prosthetic superstructure had an influence on the survival of the implants. Both implant systems proved to be sufficient alternatives for the support of provisional restorations.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string>
<json:string>transitional implants</json:string>
<json:string>maxilla</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic</json:string>
<json:string>mandible</json:string>
<json:string>primary stability</json:string>
<json:string>prosthesis</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous</json:string>
<json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string>
<json:string>maxillofac</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous patients</json:string>
<json:string>denture</json:string>
<json:string>krennmair</json:string>
<json:string>survival rate</json:string>
<json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string>
<json:string>augmentation</json:string>
<json:string>implant systems</json:string>
<json:string>failure rate</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous jaws</json:string>
<json:string>transitional</json:string>
<json:string>removable</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic restoration</json:string>
<json:string>tooth status</json:string>
<json:string>immediate loading</json:string>
<json:string>prosthet dent</json:string>
<json:string>medium stability</json:string>
<json:string>implant stability</json:string>
<json:string>observation period</json:string>
<json:string>transitional implant</json:string>
<json:string>healing time</json:string>
<json:string>implant placement</json:string>
<json:string>dental implants</json:string>
<json:string>insertion</json:string>
<json:string>implant survival</json:string>
<json:string>augmentation procedures</json:string>
<json:string>screw design</json:string>
<json:string>titanium alloy</json:string>
<json:string>transitional implant systems</json:string>
<json:string>case reports</json:string>
<json:string>titanium implants</json:string>
<json:string>healing period</json:string>
<json:string>bone quality</json:string>
<json:string>provisional restorations</json:string>
<json:string>titanium</json:string>
<json:string>dent</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>S. HEBERER</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité‐Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>D. HILDEBRAND</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Dental Practice, Berlin, Germany</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>K. NELSON</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité‐Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>implant success</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>primary stability</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>transitional implants</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId><json:string>JOOR2166</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-ZDPNDWP0-7</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Summary  The aim of this present study was to evaluate the success of immediately loaded transitional implants and to identify possible influential factors. A total of 64 patients were recruited in a private specialist implant practice. Two different implant systems were evaluated (IPI, Nobel Biocare, Sweden; I‐Plant, Unor, Switzerland). Primary stability, survival rate, gender, location, the type of prosthetic restoration and the tooth status of the opposite jaw were analysed using Kaplan–Meier or Pearson Chi‐Square test. A total of 254 transitional implants were placed, thereof 216 were IPI implants and 38 I‐Plant implants. The overall observation period ranged between 2 and 426 days. The results demonstrated a survival rate of 82·4% for the IPI system and 84·2% for the I‐Plant system. None of the transitional implants with a good primary stability were lost during the observation period. The primary stability showed significant influence on the implant survival. There was no significant difference in survival of the implants between the two implant systems. Neither the gender, the kind of superstructure, the location of the implant, the tooth status of the opposing jaw or the immediate prosthetic superstructure had an influence on the survival of the implants. Both implant systems proved to be sufficient alternatives for the support of provisional restorations.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>208</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1386</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>3</keywordCount>
<score>8.051</score>
<pdfWordCount>3555</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>23007</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study</title>
<pmid><json:string>21070328</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre><json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string>
</doi>
<issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>38</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<pages><first>447</first>
<last>453</last>
<total>7</total>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2011</json:string>
<json:string>1994</json:string>
<json:string>1999</json:string>
<json:string>1977</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string>
<json:string>GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan</json:string>
<json:string>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</json:string>
<json:string>Ratiopharm, Ulm, Germany</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>Nadine Hotz</json:string>
<json:string>G. Siebert</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>Paris</json:string>
<json:string>Switzerland</json:string>
<json:string>Germany</json:string>
<json:string>Basel</json:string>
<json:string>France</json:string>
<json:string>Sweden</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl><json:string>Krennmair et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Froum et al.</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-ZDPNDWP0-7</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string>
</scopus>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2011</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02166.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability><licence>© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="2011-06"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study</title>
<title level="a" type="short">TRANSITIONAL IMPLANTS IN EDENTULOUS JAWS</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">S.</forename>
<surname>HEBERER</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité‐Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">D.</forename>
<surname>HILDEBRAND</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Dental Practice, Berlin, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">K.</forename>
<surname>NELSON</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité‐Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-ZDPNDWP0-7</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02166.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">JOOR2166</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR2166.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jor.2011.38.issue-6</idno>
<idno type="product">JOOR</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">38</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="447">447</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="453">453</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2011-06"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Summary </hi>
 The aim of this present study was to evaluate the success of immediately loaded transitional implants and to identify possible influential factors. A total of 64 patients were recruited in a private specialist implant practice. Two different implant systems were evaluated (IPI, Nobel Biocare, Sweden; I‐Plant, Unor, Switzerland). Primary stability, survival rate, gender, location, the type of prosthetic restoration and the tooth status of the opposite jaw were analysed using Kaplan–Meier or Pearson Chi‐Square test. A total of 254 transitional implants were placed, thereof 216 were IPI implants and 38 I‐Plant implants. The overall observation period ranged between 2 and 426 days. The results demonstrated a survival rate of 82·4% for the IPI system and 84·2% for the I‐Plant system. None of the transitional implants with a good primary stability were lost during the observation period. The primary stability showed significant influence on the implant survival. There was no significant difference in survival of the implants between the two implant systems. Neither the gender, the kind of superstructure, the location of the implant, the tooth status of the opposing jaw or the immediate prosthetic superstructure had an influence on the survival of the implants. Both implant systems proved to be sufficient alternatives for the support of provisional restorations.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implant success</term>
<term xml:id="k2">primary stability</term>
<term xml:id="k3">transitional implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi>
<issn type="print">0305-182X</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn>
<idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="06106"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jor.2011.38.issue-6</doi>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="38">38</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2011-06">June 2011</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="8" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02166.x</doi>
<idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR2166"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright>
<eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.4.8 mode:FullText" date="2011-05-03"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-11-11"></event>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2010-11-11"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-05-03"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="447">447</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="453">453</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo>Dr Susanne Heberer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité‐Campus Virchow Clinic, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany. E‐mail: <email>Susanne.Heberer@charite.de</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR2166.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 10 May 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory>
<countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main">Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">S. HEBERER <i>et al.</i>
</title>
<title type="short">TRANSITIONAL IMPLANTS IN EDENTULOUS JAWS</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>S.</givenNames>
<familyName>HEBERER</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>D.</givenNames>
<familyName>HILDEBRAND</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>K.</givenNames>
<familyName>NELSON</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité‐Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Dental Practice, Berlin, Germany</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implant success</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">primary stability</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">transitional implants</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Summary </b>
 The aim of this present study was to evaluate the success of immediately loaded transitional implants and to identify possible influential factors. A total of 64 patients were recruited in a private specialist implant practice. Two different implant systems were evaluated (IPI, Nobel Biocare, Sweden; I‐Plant, Unor, Switzerland). Primary stability, survival rate, gender, location, the type of prosthetic restoration and the tooth status of the opposite jaw were analysed using Kaplan–Meier or Pearson Chi‐Square test. A total of 254 transitional implants were placed, thereof 216 were IPI implants and 38 I‐Plant implants. The overall observation period ranged between 2 and 426 days. The results demonstrated a survival rate of 82·4% for the IPI system and 84·2% for the I‐Plant system. None of the transitional implants with a good primary stability were lost during the observation period. The primary stability showed significant influence on the implant survival. There was no significant difference in survival of the implants between the two implant systems. Neither the gender, the kind of superstructure, the location of the implant, the tooth status of the opposing jaw or the immediate prosthetic superstructure had an influence on the survival of the implants. Both implant systems proved to be sufficient alternatives for the support of provisional restorations.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>TRANSITIONAL IMPLANTS IN EDENTULOUS JAWS</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">S.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">HEBERER</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité‐Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">HILDEBRAND</namePart>
<affiliation>Dental Practice, Berlin, Germany</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">K.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">NELSON</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité‐Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-06</dateIssued>
<edition>Accepted for publication 10 May 2010</edition>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">6</extent>
<extent unit="tables">0</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract>Summary  The aim of this present study was to evaluate the success of immediately loaded transitional implants and to identify possible influential factors. A total of 64 patients were recruited in a private specialist implant practice. Two different implant systems were evaluated (IPI, Nobel Biocare, Sweden; I‐Plant, Unor, Switzerland). Primary stability, survival rate, gender, location, the type of prosthetic restoration and the tooth status of the opposite jaw were analysed using Kaplan–Meier or Pearson Chi‐Square test. A total of 254 transitional implants were placed, thereof 216 were IPI implants and 38 I‐Plant implants. The overall observation period ranged between 2 and 426 days. The results demonstrated a survival rate of 82·4% for the IPI system and 84·2% for the I‐Plant system. None of the transitional implants with a good primary stability were lost during the observation period. The primary stability showed significant influence on the implant survival. There was no significant difference in survival of the implants between the two implant systems. Neither the gender, the kind of superstructure, the location of the implant, the tooth status of the opposing jaw or the immediate prosthetic superstructure had an influence on the survival of the implants. Both implant systems proved to be sufficient alternatives for the support of provisional restorations.</abstract>
<subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>implant success</topic>
<topic>primary stability</topic>
<topic>transitional implants</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier>
<part><date>2011</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>38</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>6</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>447</start>
<end>453</end>
<total>7</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-ZDPNDWP0-7</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02166.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR2166</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005945 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005945 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:B3200A524E2A7DCB5BCCC74A4710F3B72EAA96E4
   |texte=   Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study

Survival rate and potential influential factors for two transitional implant systems in edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri