Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone
Identifieur interne : 005868 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005867; suivant : 005869Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone
Auteurs : Henry Martinez ; Mithridade Davarpanah ; Patrick Missika ; Renato Celletti ; Richard LazzaraSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2001-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Albrektsson, Anchorage, Biomedical, Biomedical materials research, Bone density, Bone healing, Bone quality, Buser, Clin, Clinical studies, Cochran, Cortical bone, Davarpanah, Dense bone, Density bone, Dental implants, Dentistry, Early failures, Experimental study, Failure rates, Friberg, Impl, Implant, Implant contact, Implant diameter, Implant placement, Implant site, Implant stability, Implant surface, Implant surface texture, Implants research, Initial implant stability, Initial stability, International journal, Jemt, Johansson, Lazzara, Lekholm, Machined, Martinez, Maxillary, Maxillary tuberosity, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial surgery, Mobile implant, Multicenter, Multicenter study, Nobel biocare, Optimal implant stabilization, Oral impl, Oral surgery, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegration, Primary stability, Private practice, Prospective multicenter study, Prosthetic, Resonance frequency, Scanning electron microscope photomicrograph, Sennerby, Success rate, Surface textures, Surgical, Surgical preparation, Surgical protocol, Tactile perception, Titanium, Titanium implants, Zarb.
- Teeft :
- Albrektsson, Anchorage, Biomedical, Biomedical materials research, Bone density, Bone healing, Bone quality, Buser, Clin, Clinical studies, Cochran, Cortical bone, Davarpanah, Dense bone, Density bone, Dental implants, Dentistry, Early failures, Experimental study, Failure rates, Friberg, Impl, Implant, Implant contact, Implant diameter, Implant placement, Implant site, Implant stability, Implant surface, Implant surface texture, Implants research, Initial implant stability, Initial stability, International journal, Jemt, Johansson, Lazzara, Lekholm, Machined, Martinez, Maxillary, Maxillary tuberosity, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial surgery, Mobile implant, Multicenter, Multicenter study, Nobel biocare, Optimal implant stabilization, Oral impl, Oral surgery, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegration, Primary stability, Private practice, Prospective multicenter study, Prosthetic, Resonance frequency, Scanning electron microscope photomicrograph, Sennerby, Success rate, Surface textures, Surgical, Surgical preparation, Surgical protocol, Tactile perception, Titanium, Titanium implants, Zarb.
Abstract
Abstract: Initial stability of the implant is one of the fundamental criteria for obtaining osseointegration. An adequate primary anchorage is often difficult to achieve in low density bone (type IV). Various surgical suggestions were advanced in the 1980s which were aimed at achieving optimal osseous integration in poor quality bone. They offered satisfactory short‐term results. Recently, as a result of surgical and technological innovations, new therapeutic proposals have shown very interesting results in their initial studies.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:B172E58CBFB4A347F81ABAE8E2721CB2F874B44DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone</title><author><name sortKey="Martinez, Henry" sort="Martinez, Henry" uniqKey="Martinez H" first="Henry" last="Martinez">Henry Martinez</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, University of Paris 7, Paris.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Davarpanah, Mithridade" sort="Davarpanah, Mithridade" uniqKey="Davarpanah M" first="Mithridade" last="Davarpanah">Mithridade Davarpanah</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Pitié Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, and Private Practice, Paris.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: m.davarpanah@wanadoo.fr</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Missika, Patrick" sort="Missika, Patrick" uniqKey="Missika P" first="Patrick" last="Missika">Patrick Missika</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Paris 7, and Private Practice, Paris, France.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Celletti, Renato" sort="Celletti, Renato" uniqKey="Celletti R" first="Renato" last="Celletti">Renato Celletti</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of G. d’Annunzio, Chieti, Italy, and Private Practice, Rome, Italy.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lazzara, Richard" sort="Lazzara, Richard" uniqKey="Lazzara R" first="Richard" last="Lazzara">Richard Lazzara</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Periodontal and Implant Regenerative Center, University of Maryland, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B172E58CBFB4A347F81ABAE8E2721CB2F874B44D</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B172E58CBFB4A347F81ABAE8E2721CB2F874B44D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005868</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005868</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone</title><author><name sortKey="Martinez, Henry" sort="Martinez, Henry" uniqKey="Martinez H" first="Henry" last="Martinez">Henry Martinez</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, University of Paris 7, Paris.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Davarpanah, Mithridade" sort="Davarpanah, Mithridade" uniqKey="Davarpanah M" first="Mithridade" last="Davarpanah">Mithridade Davarpanah</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Pitié Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, and Private Practice, Paris.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: m.davarpanah@wanadoo.fr</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Missika, Patrick" sort="Missika, Patrick" uniqKey="Missika P" first="Patrick" last="Missika">Patrick Missika</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Paris 7, and Private Practice, Paris, France.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Celletti, Renato" sort="Celletti, Renato" uniqKey="Celletti R" first="Renato" last="Celletti">Renato Celletti</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of G. d’Annunzio, Chieti, Italy, and Private Practice, Rome, Italy.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lazzara, Richard" sort="Lazzara, Richard" uniqKey="Lazzara R" first="Richard" last="Lazzara">Richard Lazzara</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Periodontal and Implant Regenerative Center, University of Maryland, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="423">423</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="432">432</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-10">2001-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Anchorage</term><term>Biomedical</term><term>Biomedical materials research</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone healing</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Buser</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical studies</term><term>Cochran</term><term>Cortical bone</term><term>Davarpanah</term><term>Dense bone</term><term>Density bone</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Early failures</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Failure rates</term><term>Friberg</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant contact</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant surface texture</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Initial implant stability</term><term>Initial stability</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Johansson</term><term>Lazzara</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Machined</term><term>Martinez</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary tuberosity</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Mobile implant</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Optimal implant stabilization</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral surgery</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Resonance frequency</term><term>Scanning electron microscope photomicrograph</term><term>Sennerby</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Surface textures</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical preparation</term><term>Surgical protocol</term><term>Tactile perception</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Anchorage</term><term>Biomedical</term><term>Biomedical materials research</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone healing</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Buser</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical studies</term><term>Cochran</term><term>Cortical bone</term><term>Davarpanah</term><term>Dense bone</term><term>Density bone</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Early failures</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Failure rates</term><term>Friberg</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant contact</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant surface texture</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Initial implant stability</term><term>Initial stability</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Johansson</term><term>Lazzara</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Machined</term><term>Martinez</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary tuberosity</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Mobile implant</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Optimal implant stabilization</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral surgery</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Resonance frequency</term><term>Scanning electron microscope photomicrograph</term><term>Sennerby</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Surface textures</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical preparation</term><term>Surgical protocol</term><term>Tactile perception</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: Initial stability of the implant is one of the fundamental criteria for obtaining osseointegration. An adequate primary anchorage is often difficult to achieve in low density bone (type IV). Various surgical suggestions were advanced in the 1980s which were aimed at achieving optimal osseous integration in poor quality bone. They offered satisfactory short‐term results. Recently, as a result of surgical and technological innovations, new therapeutic proposals have shown very interesting results in their initial studies.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>density bone</json:string><json:string>lekholm</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>optimal implant stabilization</json:string><json:string>multicenter</json:string><json:string>davarpanah</json:string><json:string>initial stability</json:string><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>implant contact</json:string><json:string>sennerby</json:string><json:string>bone density</json:string><json:string>friberg</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>bone quality</json:string><json:string>jemt</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>buser</json:string><json:string>zarb</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>biomedical</json:string><json:string>biomedical materials research</json:string><json:string>lazzara</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>albrektsson</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>anchorage</json:string><json:string>johansson</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>machined</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>success rate</json:string><json:string>bone healing</json:string><json:string>scanning electron microscope photomicrograph</json:string><json:string>cortical bone</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>prospective multicenter study</json:string><json:string>tactile perception</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>surgical protocol</json:string><json:string>implant surface</json:string><json:string>implant site</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>cochran</json:string><json:string>primary stability</json:string><json:string>early failures</json:string><json:string>surface textures</json:string><json:string>initial implant stability</json:string><json:string>clinical studies</json:string><json:string>implant surface texture</json:string><json:string>oral surgery</json:string><json:string>implant stability</json:string><json:string>dense bone</json:string><json:string>implant diameter</json:string><json:string>private practice</json:string><json:string>experimental study</json:string><json:string>surgical preparation</json:string><json:string>multicenter study</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>mobile implant</json:string><json:string>resonance frequency</json:string><json:string>failure rates</json:string><json:string>maxillary tuberosity</json:string><json:string>martinez</json:string><json:string>stabilization</json:string><json:string>bone</json:string><json:string>wide implant</json:string><json:string>globular topography</json:string><json:string>titanium surface</json:string><json:string>clinical view</json:string><json:string>lekholm zarb</json:string><json:string>late failures</json:string><json:string>poor bone quality</json:string><json:string>therapeutic proposals</json:string><json:string>success rates</json:string><json:string>highest percentage</json:string><json:string>acid etching</json:string><json:string>surface texture</json:string><json:string>surface implants</json:string><json:string>rough surface</json:string><json:string>implant surfaces</json:string><json:string>primary anchorage</json:string><json:string>osseotitetm implants</json:string><json:string>prosthetic predictability</json:string><json:string>dense trabecular bone</json:string><json:string>implant width</json:string><json:string>better implant stability</json:string><json:string>bone volume</json:string><json:string>longitudinal studies</json:string><json:string>nobel biocarea</json:string><json:string>wide platform</json:string><json:string>implant system</json:string><json:string>darle jorneus</json:string><json:string>thin layer</json:string><json:string>implant designs</json:string><json:string>bone condensation</json:string><json:string>osteotome technique</json:string><json:string>primary implant stability</json:string><json:string>utmost importance</json:string><json:string>implant design</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>implant mobility</json:string><json:string>fundamental criteria</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>bone growth</json:string><json:string>bone formation</json:string><json:string>trabecular bone</json:string><json:string>good results</json:string><json:string>high success rates</json:string><json:string>secondary stability</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string><json:string>histomorphometric study</json:string><json:string>miniature pigs</json:string><json:string>sennerby meredith</json:string><json:string>resonance frequency measurements</json:string><json:string>wide diameter implants</json:string><json:string>mithridade davarpanah</json:string><json:string>ternational journal</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>mobile implants</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Henry Martinez</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, University of Paris 7, Paris.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Mithridade Davarpanah</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Pitié Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, and Private Practice, Paris.</json:string><json:string>E-mail: m.davarpanah@wanadoo.fr</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Patrick Missika</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Paris 7, and Private Practice, Paris, France.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Renato Celletti</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, University of G. d’Annunzio, Chieti, Italy, and Private Practice, Rome, Italy.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Richard Lazzara</name><affiliations><json:string>Periodontal and Implant Regenerative Center, University of Maryland, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>initial stability</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osseointegration</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone density</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>surface texture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant design</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR120501</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-4NJ4VG71-P</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>reviewArticle</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Initial stability of the implant is one of the fundamental criteria for obtaining osseointegration. An adequate primary anchorage is often difficult to achieve in low density bone (type IV). Various surgical suggestions were advanced in the 1980s which were aimed at achieving optimal osseous integration in poor quality bone. They offered satisfactory short‐term results. Recently, as a result of surgical and technological innovations, new therapeutic proposals have shown very interesting results in their initial studies.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>76</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>535</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><score>7.912</score><pdfWordCount>6133</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>39965</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 794 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone</title><pmid><json:string>11564101</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>423</first><last>432</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1974</json:string><json:string>1992</json:string><json:string>1997</json:string><json:string>1990s</json:string><json:string>2001</json:string><json:string>1987</json:string><json:string>1994</json:string><json:string>1988</json:string><json:string>1989</json:string><json:string>1980s</json:string><json:string>1996</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Paris France Tel</json:string><json:string>University of Maryland</json:string><json:string>Pitie Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, and Private Practice, Paris</json:string><json:string>Italy, and Private Practice, Rome, Italy</json:string><json:string>Implant Regenerative Center</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Paris</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, University</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Henry Martinez</json:string><json:string>Tulasne</json:string><json:string>Steri-OssA</json:string><json:string>Jisander</json:string><json:string>Biocare</json:string><json:string>InnovationsA</json:string><json:string>Summers</json:string><json:string>Patrick Missika</json:string><json:string>Mithridade Davarpanah</json:string><json:string>Richard Lazzara</json:string><json:string>Renato Celletti</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>France</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Davies & Dziedzic 1996</json:string><json:string>from Davies, 1998</json:string><json:string>Cochran et al. 1988, 1996</json:string><json:string>Cheang & Khor 1996</json:string><json:string>Ivanoff et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Jemt 1994</json:string><json:string>Lazzara et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Renouard et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Bowers et al. (1992)</json:string><json:string>Gotfredsen et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Meredith et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Henry et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Love 1997</json:string><json:string>Ivanoff et al. (1996)</json:string><json:string>Fernandez-Velazquez (1997)</json:string><json:string>Sullivan et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Lekholm & Zarb 1985</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Lazzara et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Johns et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Meredith et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. (1991)</json:string><json:string>Wikstrom 1996</json:string><json:string>Meredith 1997</json:string><json:string>Friberg et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Weehler 1996</json:string><json:string>Lekholm et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Wilke et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Engquist et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Keller et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Ivanoff et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Thomas et al. 1987</json:string><json:string>Johansson & Albrektsson 1991</json:string><json:string>Grunder et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Darle & Jorneus 1998</json:string><json:string>Langer et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Brånemark et al. (1984)</json:string><json:string>van Steenberghe et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1992, 1997</json:string><json:string>Sennerby & Meredith 1999</json:string><json:string>Friberg et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Jemt 1991</json:string><json:string>Martinez et al</json:string><json:string>Friberg et al. (1999)</json:string><json:string>Orenstein et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Wismeyer et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Johansson & Strid 1994</json:string><json:string>Jemt & Lekholm 1995</json:string><json:string>Lacan & Teman 1999</json:string><json:string>Davarpanah et al. 1999, 2000a</json:string><json:string>Cook et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Johnson 1992</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1991, 1998</json:string><json:string>Sennerby et al. (1992)</json:string><json:string>Orenstein et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Grunder et al. (1999)</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Wyatt & Zarb 1998</json:string><json:string>Truhlar et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Cochran 1999</json:string><json:string>Adell et al. 1981</json:string><json:string>Predecki et al. (1972)</json:string><json:string>Davarpanah et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Mericske-Stern et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Friberg et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>GomezRoman et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Trisi & Rao 1999</json:string><json:string>Friberg et al. (1991)</json:string><json:string>Wong et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Bahat 1992</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-4NJ4VG71-P</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2001</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2001</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x</json:string></doi><id>B172E58CBFB4A347F81ABAE8E2721CB2F874B44D</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B172E58CBFB4A347F81ABAE8E2721CB2F874B44D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B172E58CBFB4A347F81ABAE8E2721CB2F874B44D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B172E58CBFB4A347F81ABAE8E2721CB2F874B44D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="review-article" source="reviewArticle" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="review-article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone</title><title level="a" type="short">Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Henry</forename><surname>Martinez</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, University of Paris 7, Paris.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Mithridade</forename><surname>Davarpanah</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Pitié Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, and Private Practice, Paris.</affiliation><affiliation>
*Dr Mithridade Davarpanah,
174, rue de Courcelles
75017 Paris
France
Tel: +33 14 627 0482
Fax: +33 14 766 5460
e‐mail: m.davarpanah@wanadoo.fror
henry.martinez@wanadoo.fr</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Patrick</forename><surname>Missika</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Paris 7, and Private Practice, Paris, France.<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Renato</forename><surname>Celletti</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of G. d’Annunzio, Chieti, Italy, and Private Practice, Rome, Italy.<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Richard</forename><surname>Lazzara</surname></persName><affiliation>Periodontal and Implant Regenerative Center, University of Maryland, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">B172E58CBFB4A347F81ABAE8E2721CB2F874B44D</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-4NJ4VG71-P</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR120501</idno><idno type="supplier">clr9r606</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR120501.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2001.12.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="423">423</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="432">432</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract:</hi> Initial stability of the implant is one of the fundamental criteria for obtaining osseointegration. An adequate primary anchorage is often difficult to achieve in low density bone (type IV). Various surgical suggestions were advanced in the 1980s which were aimed at achieving optimal osseous integration in poor quality bone. They offered satisfactory short‐term results. Recently, as a result of surgical and technological innovations, new therapeutic proposals have shown very interesting results in their initial studies.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="fr" style="main"><head>Résumé</head><p>La stabilité initiale d’un implant est un des critères fondamentaux pour obtenir l’ostéointégration. Un ancrage primaire adéquat est souvent difficile à obtenir en présence d’un os de faible densité (Type IV). Différentes suggestions chirurgicales qui ont été avancées dans les années 1980 ont été essayées afin d’obtenir une intégration osseuse optimale dans un os de pauvre qualité. Elles offraient des résultats satisfaisants à court terme. Récemment les résultats des innovations tant chirurgicales que technologiques ont donné suite à des nouvelles propositions thérapeutiques qui ont montré des résultats très intéressants dans leurs études initiales.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="de" style="main"><head>Zusammenfassung</head><p>Die Primärstabilität des Implantates ist eine der grundlegenden Anforderungen zur Erreichung einer Osseointegration. Die Erreichung einer ausreichenden Primärstabilität ist bei Knochen von geringer Dichte (Typ IV) oft schwierig zu erreichen. Zur Erreichung einer optimalen Osseointegration bei unzureichender Knochenqualität wurden in den Achzigerjahren verschiedene chirurgische Vorschläge publiziert. Sie zeigten alle zufriedenstellende Kurzzeitresultate. In letzter Zeit zeigten neue therapeutische Vorschläge, resultierend aus chirurgischen und technischen Neuerungen, sehr interessante Erfolge, zumindest in den ersten Phasen der klinischen Studien.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="es" style="main"><head>Resumen</head><p>La estabilidad inicial del implante es un criterio fundamental par obtener osteointegración. A veces es dificil lograr un anclaje primario en hueso de baja densidad (Tipo IV). Se han avanzado varias sugerencias quirúrgicas en los 80 que intentaban lograr una integración óptima en hueso de baja calidad. Estas ofrecían resultados satisfactorios a corto plazo. Recientemente, como resultado de las innovaciones quirúrgicas y tecnológicas, nuevas propuestas terapéuticas han mostrado resultados muy interesantes en sus estudios iniciales.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">initial stability</term><term xml:id="k2">osseointegration</term><term xml:id="k3">bone density</term><term xml:id="k4">surface texture</term><term xml:id="k5">implant design</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Review Article</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B172E58CBFB4A347F81ABAE8E2721CB2F874B44D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10005"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2001.12.issue-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="12">12</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2001-10">October 2001</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="reviewArticle" position="0042300" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR120501"></id><id type="supplier" value="clr9r606"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Review Article</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-07-07"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-07-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="423">423</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="432">432</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>
*<i>Dr Mithridade Davarpanah</i>,
174, rue de Courcelles
75017 Paris
France
Tel: +33 14 627 0482
Fax: +33 14 766 5460
e‐mail: <email>m.davarpanah@wanadoo.fr</email>or
<email>henry.martinez@wanadoo.fr</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR120501.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 30 October 2000</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="20"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="87"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6771"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="63"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone</title><title type="shortAuthors">Martinez et al</title><title type="short">Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Henry</givenNames><familyName>Martinez</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Mithridade</givenNames><familyName>Davarpanah</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Patrick</givenNames><familyName>Missika</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Renato</givenNames><familyName>Celletti</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a5"><personName><givenNames>Richard</givenNames><familyName>Lazzara</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, University of Paris 7, Paris.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, Pitié Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, and Private Practice, Paris.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Paris 7, and Private Practice, Paris, France.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of G. d’Annunzio, Chieti, Italy, and Private Practice, Rome, Italy.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Periodontal and Implant Regenerative Center, University of Maryland, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">initial stability</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">osseointegration</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">bone density</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">surface texture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">implant design</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract:</b> Initial stability of the implant is one of the fundamental criteria for obtaining osseointegration. An adequate primary anchorage is often difficult to achieve in low density bone (type IV). Various surgical suggestions were advanced in the 1980s which were aimed at achieving optimal osseous integration in poor quality bone. They offered satisfactory short‐term results. Recently, as a result of surgical and technological innovations, new therapeutic proposals have shown very interesting results in their initial studies.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="fr"><title type="main">Résumé</title><p>La stabilité initiale d’un implant est un des critères fondamentaux pour obtenir l’ostéointégration. Un ancrage primaire adéquat est souvent difficile à obtenir en présence d’un os de faible densité (Type IV). Différentes suggestions chirurgicales qui ont été avancées dans les années 1980 ont été essayées afin d’obtenir une intégration osseuse optimale dans un os de pauvre qualité. Elles offraient des résultats satisfaisants à court terme. Récemment les résultats des innovations tant chirurgicales que technologiques ont donné suite à des nouvelles propositions thérapeutiques qui ont montré des résultats très intéressants dans leurs études initiales.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="de"><title type="main">Zusammenfassung</title><p>Die Primärstabilität des Implantates ist eine der grundlegenden Anforderungen zur Erreichung einer Osseointegration. Die Erreichung einer ausreichenden Primärstabilität ist bei Knochen von geringer Dichte (Typ IV) oft schwierig zu erreichen. Zur Erreichung einer optimalen Osseointegration bei unzureichender Knochenqualität wurden in den Achzigerjahren verschiedene chirurgische Vorschläge publiziert. Sie zeigten alle zufriedenstellende Kurzzeitresultate. In letzter Zeit zeigten neue therapeutische Vorschläge, resultierend aus chirurgischen und technischen Neuerungen, sehr interessante Erfolge, zumindest in den ersten Phasen der klinischen Studien.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="es"><title type="main">Resumen</title><p>La estabilidad inicial del implante es un criterio fundamental par obtener osteointegración. A veces es dificil lograr un anclaje primario en hueso de baja densidad (Tipo IV). Se han avanzado varias sugerencias quirúrgicas en los 80 que intentaban lograr una integración óptima en hueso de baja calidad. Estas ofrecían resultados satisfactorios a corto plazo. Recientemente, como resultado de las innovaciones quirúrgicas y tecnológicas, nuevas propuestas terapéuticas han mostrado resultados muy interesantes en sus estudios iniciales.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Henry</namePart><namePart type="family">Martinez</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, University of Paris 7, Paris.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mithridade</namePart><namePart type="family">Davarpanah</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Pitié Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, and Private Practice, Paris.</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: m.davarpanah@wanadoo.fr</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Patrick</namePart><namePart type="family">Missika</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Paris 7, and Private Practice, Paris, France.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Renato</namePart><namePart type="family">Celletti</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of G. d’Annunzio, Chieti, Italy, and Private Practice, Rome, Italy.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Richard</namePart><namePart type="family">Lazzara</namePart><affiliation>Periodontal and Implant Regenerative Center, University of Maryland, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="reviewArticle" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-10</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 30 October 2000</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">20</extent><extent unit="tables">0</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">87</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">12</extent><extent unit="words">6771</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract: Initial stability of the implant is one of the fundamental criteria for obtaining osseointegration. An adequate primary anchorage is often difficult to achieve in low density bone (type IV). Various surgical suggestions were advanced in the 1980s which were aimed at achieving optimal osseous integration in poor quality bone. They offered satisfactory short‐term results. Recently, as a result of surgical and technological innovations, new therapeutic proposals have shown very interesting results in their initial studies.</abstract><abstract lang="fr">La stabilité initiale d’un implant est un des critères fondamentaux pour obtenir l’ostéointégration. Un ancrage primaire adéquat est souvent difficile à obtenir en présence d’un os de faible densité (Type IV). Différentes suggestions chirurgicales qui ont été avancées dans les années 1980 ont été essayées afin d’obtenir une intégration osseuse optimale dans un os de pauvre qualité. Elles offraient des résultats satisfaisants à court terme. Récemment les résultats des innovations tant chirurgicales que technologiques ont donné suite à des nouvelles propositions thérapeutiques qui ont montré des résultats très intéressants dans leurs études initiales.</abstract><abstract lang="de">Die Primärstabilität des Implantates ist eine der grundlegenden Anforderungen zur Erreichung einer Osseointegration. Die Erreichung einer ausreichenden Primärstabilität ist bei Knochen von geringer Dichte (Typ IV) oft schwierig zu erreichen. Zur Erreichung einer optimalen Osseointegration bei unzureichender Knochenqualität wurden in den Achzigerjahren verschiedene chirurgische Vorschläge publiziert. Sie zeigten alle zufriedenstellende Kurzzeitresultate. In letzter Zeit zeigten neue therapeutische Vorschläge, resultierend aus chirurgischen und technischen Neuerungen, sehr interessante Erfolge, zumindest in den ersten Phasen der klinischen Studien.</abstract><abstract lang="es">La estabilidad inicial del implante es un criterio fundamental par obtener osteointegración. A veces es dificil lograr un anclaje primario en hueso de baja densidad (Tipo IV). Se han avanzado varias sugerencias quirúrgicas en los 80 que intentaban lograr una integración óptima en hueso de baja calidad. Estas ofrecían resultados satisfactorios a corto plazo. Recientemente, como resultado de las innovaciones quirúrgicas y tecnológicas, nuevas propuestas terapéuticas han mostrado resultados muy interesantes en sus estudios iniciales.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>initial stability</topic><topic>osseointegration</topic><topic>bone density</topic><topic>surface texture</topic><topic>implant design</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2001</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>12</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>423</start><end>432</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">B172E58CBFB4A347F81ABAE8E2721CB2F874B44D</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-4NJ4VG71-P</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR120501</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B172E58CBFB4A347F81ABAE8E2721CB2F874B44D/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005868 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005868 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:B172E58CBFB4A347F81ABAE8E2721CB2F874B44D
|texte= Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |