Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Women, Academia and Identity: Constructions of Equal Opportunities in the ‘New Managerialism’– A Case of ‘Lipstick on the Gorilla’?

Identifieur interne : 005835 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005834; suivant : 005836

Women, Academia and Identity: Constructions of Equal Opportunities in the ‘New Managerialism’– A Case of ‘Lipstick on the Gorilla’?

Auteurs : Wendy Saunderson

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:B0D49716440865F3CE36711532EC427387CE51A2

English descriptors

Abstract

This paper has two distinct foci. The first is an introductory focus on the current position and problems of academic women working in UK universities (despite the valorization of Equal Opportunities (EO), and within the context and constraints of the ‘New Managerialism’). The second and main focus is on the personal impact of university work on the lives of academic women, towards exploring and uncovering how higher education’s institutional structures and processes impact upon academic women’s identity structures and processes. Idiographic analyses of a small number of case studies suggest that despite considerable recent gains, some academic women’s identities are compromised, challenged and made ‘vulnerable’ through feelings of being undervalued, overburdened and often the subjects of unequal treatment – more than 30 years after the Equal Pay Act and almost 30 years after the Sex Discrimination Act. The paper’s conclusions therefore warn that continued valorization of EO policy without its assimilation into the underlying core institutional culture will sanction the valediction of any tangible or effective progress in HE’s ability to produce more robust academic identities and more satisfying daily working lives for academic women. Insofar as such assimilation is not achieved, the policy, practice and rhetoric of equal opportunities and equal treatment in UK higher education will remain little more than ‘lipstick on the gorilla’.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2273.00226

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:B0D49716440865F3CE36711532EC427387CE51A2

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Women, Academia and Identity: Constructions of Equal Opportunities in the ‘New Managerialism’– A Case of ‘Lipstick on the Gorilla’?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Saunderson, Wendy" sort="Saunderson, Wendy" uniqKey="Saunderson W" first="Wendy" last="Saunderson">Wendy Saunderson</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of Ulster, Coleraine</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B0D49716440865F3CE36711532EC427387CE51A2</idno>
<date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/1468-2273.00226</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B0D49716440865F3CE36711532EC427387CE51A2/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005835</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005835</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Women, Academia and Identity: Constructions of Equal Opportunities in the ‘New Managerialism’– A Case of ‘Lipstick on the Gorilla’?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Saunderson, Wendy" sort="Saunderson, Wendy" uniqKey="Saunderson W" first="Wendy" last="Saunderson">Wendy Saunderson</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of Ulster, Coleraine</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Higher Education Quarterly</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0951-5224</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-2273</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">56</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="376">376</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="406">406</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">31</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2002-10">2002-10</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0951-5224</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0951-5224</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Academia</term>
<term>Academic</term>
<term>Academic careers</term>
<term>Academic core</term>
<term>Academic identities</term>
<term>Academic identity</term>
<term>Academic labour</term>
<term>Academic life</term>
<term>Academic lives</term>
<term>Academic self</term>
<term>Academic staff</term>
<term>Academic women</term>
<term>Academics need</term>
<term>Aldershot</term>
<term>Analyse identity</term>
<term>Analysing</term>
<term>Analysing identity</term>
<term>Anorexia nervosa</term>
<term>Ashgate</term>
<term>Bett report</term>
<term>Blackwell</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>British journal</term>
<term>British universities</term>
<term>Career progression</term>
<term>Case studies</term>
<term>Case study</term>
<term>Cent minority</term>
<term>Clinical contexts</term>
<term>Considerable gains</term>
<term>Contractual status</term>
<term>Core part</term>
<term>Corporatist values</term>
<term>Current contexts</term>
<term>Dearing report</term>
<term>Different ways</term>
<term>Distinct types</term>
<term>Education reform</term>
<term>Education supplement</term>
<term>Educational change</term>
<term>Effective progress</term>
<term>Empathetic identification</term>
<term>Empirical findings</term>
<term>Employment contracts</term>
<term>Equal opportunities</term>
<term>Equal treatment</term>
<term>Equality unit</term>
<term>European journal</term>
<term>Evaluative dimensions</term>
<term>Falmer press</term>
<term>Female academics</term>
<term>Female academics colleagues</term>
<term>Female academics students</term>
<term>Gender</term>
<term>Gender equality</term>
<term>Gender inequalities</term>
<term>Gender parity</term>
<term>Gendered</term>
<term>Gendered expectations</term>
<term>Global classification</term>
<term>Hard work</term>
<term>Helsinki university press</term>
<term>Higher education</term>
<term>Highest evaluations</term>
<term>Ideal self</term>
<term>Identification conflicts</term>
<term>Identity aspirations</term>
<term>Identity development</term>
<term>Identity exploration</term>
<term>Identity instrument</term>
<term>Identity parameters</term>
<term>Identity profiles</term>
<term>Identity state</term>
<term>Identity states</term>
<term>Identity structures</term>
<term>Identity variants</term>
<term>Idiographic</term>
<term>Idiographic analyses</term>
<term>Institutional culture</term>
<term>Institutional structures</term>
<term>League tables</term>
<term>Male academics</term>
<term>Management approaches</term>
<term>Managerialism</term>
<term>Minority status</term>
<term>Morley</term>
<term>Natfhe</term>
<term>Negative role models</term>
<term>Open university press</term>
<term>Opposite poles</term>
<term>Other women</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Particular framework</term>
<term>Past decade</term>
<term>Past self</term>
<term>Past selves</term>
<term>Permanent post</term>
<term>Personal factors</term>
<term>Personal impact</term>
<term>Policy issues</term>
<term>Policy solutions</term>
<term>Positive role models</term>
<term>Problematic issues</term>
<term>Processes impact</term>
<term>Promotion procedures</term>
<term>Psychological processes</term>
<term>Public sector reform</term>
<term>Qualitative data</term>
<term>Relative paucity</term>
<term>Research interventions</term>
<term>Role models</term>
<term>Routledge</term>
<term>Saunderson</term>
<term>Senior lecturers</term>
<term>Senior positions</term>
<term>Small number</term>
<term>Social justice</term>
<term>Social policy</term>
<term>Social world</term>
<term>Strongest conflicts</term>
<term>Structural pressure</term>
<term>Such assimilation</term>
<term>Support students</term>
<term>Teaching academics</term>
<term>Ultimate power control</term>
<term>Unequal treatment</term>
<term>Universities today</term>
<term>University life</term>
<term>University sector</term>
<term>University structures</term>
<term>Value systems</term>
<term>Vertical segregation</term>
<term>Voluntary action</term>
<term>Vulnerable identities</term>
<term>Women academics</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Academia</term>
<term>Academic</term>
<term>Academic careers</term>
<term>Academic core</term>
<term>Academic identities</term>
<term>Academic identity</term>
<term>Academic labour</term>
<term>Academic life</term>
<term>Academic lives</term>
<term>Academic self</term>
<term>Academic staff</term>
<term>Academic women</term>
<term>Academics need</term>
<term>Aldershot</term>
<term>Analyse identity</term>
<term>Analysing</term>
<term>Analysing identity</term>
<term>Anorexia nervosa</term>
<term>Ashgate</term>
<term>Bett report</term>
<term>Blackwell</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>British journal</term>
<term>British universities</term>
<term>Career progression</term>
<term>Case studies</term>
<term>Case study</term>
<term>Cent minority</term>
<term>Clinical contexts</term>
<term>Considerable gains</term>
<term>Contractual status</term>
<term>Core part</term>
<term>Corporatist values</term>
<term>Current contexts</term>
<term>Dearing report</term>
<term>Different ways</term>
<term>Distinct types</term>
<term>Education reform</term>
<term>Education supplement</term>
<term>Educational change</term>
<term>Effective progress</term>
<term>Empathetic identification</term>
<term>Empirical findings</term>
<term>Employment contracts</term>
<term>Equal opportunities</term>
<term>Equal treatment</term>
<term>Equality unit</term>
<term>European journal</term>
<term>Evaluative dimensions</term>
<term>Falmer press</term>
<term>Female academics</term>
<term>Female academics colleagues</term>
<term>Female academics students</term>
<term>Gender</term>
<term>Gender equality</term>
<term>Gender inequalities</term>
<term>Gender parity</term>
<term>Gendered</term>
<term>Gendered expectations</term>
<term>Global classification</term>
<term>Hard work</term>
<term>Helsinki university press</term>
<term>Higher education</term>
<term>Highest evaluations</term>
<term>Ideal self</term>
<term>Identification conflicts</term>
<term>Identity aspirations</term>
<term>Identity development</term>
<term>Identity exploration</term>
<term>Identity instrument</term>
<term>Identity parameters</term>
<term>Identity profiles</term>
<term>Identity state</term>
<term>Identity states</term>
<term>Identity structures</term>
<term>Identity variants</term>
<term>Idiographic</term>
<term>Idiographic analyses</term>
<term>Institutional culture</term>
<term>Institutional structures</term>
<term>League tables</term>
<term>Male academics</term>
<term>Management approaches</term>
<term>Managerialism</term>
<term>Minority status</term>
<term>Morley</term>
<term>Natfhe</term>
<term>Negative role models</term>
<term>Open university press</term>
<term>Opposite poles</term>
<term>Other women</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Particular framework</term>
<term>Past decade</term>
<term>Past self</term>
<term>Past selves</term>
<term>Permanent post</term>
<term>Personal factors</term>
<term>Personal impact</term>
<term>Policy issues</term>
<term>Policy solutions</term>
<term>Positive role models</term>
<term>Problematic issues</term>
<term>Processes impact</term>
<term>Promotion procedures</term>
<term>Psychological processes</term>
<term>Public sector reform</term>
<term>Qualitative data</term>
<term>Relative paucity</term>
<term>Research interventions</term>
<term>Role models</term>
<term>Routledge</term>
<term>Saunderson</term>
<term>Senior lecturers</term>
<term>Senior positions</term>
<term>Small number</term>
<term>Social justice</term>
<term>Social policy</term>
<term>Social world</term>
<term>Strongest conflicts</term>
<term>Structural pressure</term>
<term>Such assimilation</term>
<term>Support students</term>
<term>Teaching academics</term>
<term>Ultimate power control</term>
<term>Unequal treatment</term>
<term>Universities today</term>
<term>University life</term>
<term>University sector</term>
<term>University structures</term>
<term>Value systems</term>
<term>Vertical segregation</term>
<term>Voluntary action</term>
<term>Vulnerable identities</term>
<term>Women academics</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper has two distinct foci. The first is an introductory focus on the current position and problems of academic women working in UK universities (despite the valorization of Equal Opportunities (EO), and within the context and constraints of the ‘New Managerialism’). The second and main focus is on the personal impact of university work on the lives of academic women, towards exploring and uncovering how higher education’s institutional structures and processes impact upon academic women’s identity structures and processes. Idiographic analyses of a small number of case studies suggest that despite considerable recent gains, some academic women’s identities are compromised, challenged and made ‘vulnerable’ through feelings of being undervalued, overburdened and often the subjects of unequal treatment – more than 30 years after the Equal Pay Act and almost 30 years after the Sex Discrimination Act. The paper’s conclusions therefore warn that continued valorization of EO policy without its assimilation into the underlying core institutional culture will sanction the valediction of any tangible or effective progress in HE’s ability to produce more robust academic identities and more satisfying daily working lives for academic women. Insofar as such assimilation is not achieved, the policy, practice and rhetoric of equal opportunities and equal treatment in UK higher education will remain little more than ‘lipstick on the gorilla’.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords>
<teeft>
<json:string>academia</json:string>
<json:string>higher education</json:string>
<json:string>academic women</json:string>
<json:string>managerialism</json:string>
<json:string>saunderson</json:string>
<json:string>equal opportunities</json:string>
<json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string>
<json:string>academic identities</json:string>
<json:string>university sector</json:string>
<json:string>past self</json:string>
<json:string>gendered</json:string>
<json:string>gender</json:string>
<json:string>aldershot</json:string>
<json:string>analysing</json:string>
<json:string>idiographic</json:string>
<json:string>routledge</json:string>
<json:string>natfhe</json:string>
<json:string>academic identity</json:string>
<json:string>ashgate</json:string>
<json:string>identity states</json:string>
<json:string>identity instrument</json:string>
<json:string>identity structures</json:string>
<json:string>analysing identity</json:string>
<json:string>vulnerable identities</json:string>
<json:string>academic lives</json:string>
<json:string>female academics</json:string>
<json:string>open university press</json:string>
<json:string>male academics</json:string>
<json:string>positive role models</json:string>
<json:string>equal treatment</json:string>
<json:string>clinical contexts</json:string>
<json:string>university life</json:string>
<json:string>global classification</json:string>
<json:string>academic staff</json:string>
<json:string>ideal self</json:string>
<json:string>negative role models</json:string>
<json:string>academic self</json:string>
<json:string>current contexts</json:string>
<json:string>promotion procedures</json:string>
<json:string>value systems</json:string>
<json:string>blackwell</json:string>
<json:string>institutional structures</json:string>
<json:string>british universities</json:string>
<json:string>senior positions</json:string>
<json:string>problematic issues</json:string>
<json:string>distinct types</json:string>
<json:string>vertical segregation</json:string>
<json:string>social justice</json:string>
<json:string>anorexia nervosa</json:string>
<json:string>identity variants</json:string>
<json:string>role models</json:string>
<json:string>corporatist values</json:string>
<json:string>minority status</json:string>
<json:string>women academics</json:string>
<json:string>educational change</json:string>
<json:string>female academics colleagues</json:string>
<json:string>personal factors</json:string>
<json:string>management approaches</json:string>
<json:string>structural pressure</json:string>
<json:string>institutional culture</json:string>
<json:string>university structures</json:string>
<json:string>qualitative data</json:string>
<json:string>identity aspirations</json:string>
<json:string>identity exploration</json:string>
<json:string>other words</json:string>
<json:string>permanent post</json:string>
<json:string>identity profiles</json:string>
<json:string>unequal treatment</json:string>
<json:string>academic careers</json:string>
<json:string>relative paucity</json:string>
<json:string>case studies</json:string>
<json:string>policy issues</json:string>
<json:string>policy solutions</json:string>
<json:string>academic life</json:string>
<json:string>different ways</json:string>
<json:string>identity state</json:string>
<json:string>particular framework</json:string>
<json:string>bett report</json:string>
<json:string>small number</json:string>
<json:string>other women</json:string>
<json:string>academic labour</json:string>
<json:string>gendered expectations</json:string>
<json:string>case study</json:string>
<json:string>highest evaluations</json:string>
<json:string>empirical findings</json:string>
<json:string>idiographic analyses</json:string>
<json:string>strongest conflicts</json:string>
<json:string>past decade</json:string>
<json:string>career progression</json:string>
<json:string>such assimilation</json:string>
<json:string>identity development</json:string>
<json:string>female academics students</json:string>
<json:string>analyse identity</json:string>
<json:string>academic core</json:string>
<json:string>evaluative dimensions</json:string>
<json:string>senior lecturers</json:string>
<json:string>universities today</json:string>
<json:string>teaching academics</json:string>
<json:string>support students</json:string>
<json:string>opposite poles</json:string>
<json:string>gender parity</json:string>
<json:string>empathetic identification</json:string>
<json:string>identification conflicts</json:string>
<json:string>effective progress</json:string>
<json:string>core part</json:string>
<json:string>identity parameters</json:string>
<json:string>academics need</json:string>
<json:string>ultimate power control</json:string>
<json:string>employment contracts</json:string>
<json:string>cent minority</json:string>
<json:string>past selves</json:string>
<json:string>league tables</json:string>
<json:string>psychological processes</json:string>
<json:string>considerable gains</json:string>
<json:string>dearing report</json:string>
<json:string>social world</json:string>
<json:string>processes impact</json:string>
<json:string>personal impact</json:string>
<json:string>european journal</json:string>
<json:string>education reform</json:string>
<json:string>equality unit</json:string>
<json:string>british journal</json:string>
<json:string>voluntary action</json:string>
<json:string>hard work</json:string>
<json:string>research interventions</json:string>
<json:string>gender inequalities</json:string>
<json:string>helsinki university press</json:string>
<json:string>public sector reform</json:string>
<json:string>falmer press</json:string>
<json:string>social policy</json:string>
<json:string>gender equality</json:string>
<json:string>contractual status</json:string>
<json:string>education supplement</json:string>
<json:string>morley</json:string>
<json:string>academic</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Wendy Saunderson</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>University of Ulster, Coleraine</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<articleId>
<json:string>HEQU226</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-Z37PCJDS-7</arkIstex>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>This paper has two distinct foci. The first is an introductory focus on the current position and problems of academic women working in UK universities (despite the valorization of Equal Opportunities (EO), and within the context and constraints of the ‘New Managerialism’). The second and main focus is on the personal impact of university work on the lives of academic women, towards exploring and uncovering how higher education’s institutional structures and processes impact upon academic women’s identity structures and processes. Idiographic analyses of a small number of case studies suggest that despite considerable recent gains, some academic women’s identities are compromised, challenged and made ‘vulnerable’ through feelings of being undervalued, overburdened and often the subjects of unequal treatment – more than 30 years after the Equal Pay Act and almost 30 years after the Sex Discrimination Act. The paper’s conclusions therefore warn that continued valorization of EO policy without its assimilation into the underlying core institutional culture will sanction the valediction of any tangible or effective progress in HE’s ability to produce more robust academic identities and more satisfying daily working lives for academic women. Insofar as such assimilation is not achieved, the policy, practice and rhetoric of equal opportunities and equal treatment in UK higher education will remain little more than ‘lipstick on the gorilla’.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>9.592</score>
<pdfWordCount>10777</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>69595</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>31</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>451 x 698 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>216</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1457</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>0</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Women, Academia and Identity: Constructions of Equal Opportunities in the ‘New Managerialism’– A Case of ‘Lipstick on the Gorilla’?</title>
<genre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>Higher Education Quarterly</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2273</json:string>
</doi>
<issn>
<json:string>0951-5224</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn>
<json:string>1468-2273</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId>
<json:string>HEQU</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>56</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<pages>
<first>376</first>
<last>406</last>
<total>31</total>
</pages>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities>
<unitex>
<date>
<json:string>1992</json:string>
<json:string>1970</json:string>
<json:string>1997</json:string>
<json:string>1990s</json:string>
<json:string>1920s</json:string>
<json:string>2001</json:string>
<json:string>1960s</json:string>
<json:string>2002</json:string>
<json:string>1994</json:string>
<json:string>1999</json:string>
<json:string>1970s</json:string>
<json:string>30s</json:string>
<json:string>in the 21st century</json:string>
<json:string>40s</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName>
<json:string>Identity Instrument</json:string>
<json:string>Current UK Uni</json:string>
<json:string>Current UK University</json:string>
<json:string>Spain and Italy</json:string>
<json:string>RAE</json:string>
<json:string>Universities UK, SCOP</json:string>
<json:string>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</json:string>
<json:string>Greece, Mexico and Turkey</json:string>
<json:string>Research Assessment Exercise</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName>
<json:string>N.B. Diane</json:string>
<json:string>Wager</json:string>
<json:string>Does</json:string>
<json:string>Gayle Letherby</json:string>
<json:string>Results</json:string>
<json:string>Katie Evaluation</json:string>
<json:string>Emma Core</json:string>
<json:string>Athena Project</json:string>
<json:string>Emma</json:string>
<json:string>My Dean</json:string>
<json:string>Katie Core</json:string>
<json:string>John Shiels</json:string>
<json:string>Emma Evaluation</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName>
<json:string>UK</json:string>
<json:string>Europe</json:string>
<json:string>Britain</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl>
<json:string>Casey, 1995</json:string>
<json:string>Williams, 1999, p. 18</json:string>
<json:string>Bagilhole, 1993</json:string>
<json:string>Rendel, 1980</json:string>
<json:string>Woodward, 2000, p. 44</json:string>
<json:string>Blackmore and Sachs (2001)</json:string>
<json:string>Harris et al. (1998)</json:string>
<json:string>Cotterill and Waterhouse, 1998</json:string>
<json:string>Saunderson and McGarry, 1999</json:string>
<json:string>a notable contribution is Anderson and Williams, 2001</json:string>
<json:string>Saunderson and O’Kane, 2002</json:string>
<json:string>see Cutler and Waine, 2000</json:string>
<json:string>Hay Report, 1997</json:string>
<json:string>David, 2000</json:string>
<json:string>Dillabough, 1999</json:string>
<json:string>Ledwith and Manfredi, 2000, p. 7</json:string>
<json:string>Bird, 2000, p. 652</json:string>
<json:string>Walsh, 2002</json:string>
<json:string>Ball, 1994, p. 125</json:string>
<json:string>Clarke and Newman, 1993, p. 431</json:string>
<json:string>NATHFE, 2002a, p. 15</json:string>
<json:string>Henkel, 2001</json:string>
<json:string>DfEE, 1997</json:string>
<json:string>Saunderson, 2001a, p. 760</json:string>
<json:string>NATFHE, 2002a, p. 13</json:string>
<json:string>Goode and Bagilhole (1998)</json:string>
<json:string>Clark and Hoggett (2000, p. 239)</json:string>
<json:string>Halvorsen, 2002</json:string>
<json:string>Universities UK, 2001a</json:string>
<json:string>Hearn, 2000, p. 171</json:string>
<json:string>HESA, 2001</json:string>
<json:string>Morley, 2002, p. 87</json:string>
<json:string>AUT, 2000</json:string>
<json:string>Weinreich and Saunderson, 2002</json:string>
<json:string>Smith, 1995, p. 63</json:string>
<json:string>Weinreich, 1986</json:string>
<json:string>NATFHE, 2002a, p. 12</json:string>
<json:string>Letherby and Sheils, 2001</json:string>
<json:string>in Mackinnon and Brooks, 2001, p. 7</json:string>
<json:string>Brooks, 2001, p. 28</json:string>
<json:string>Bailey (2000)</json:string>
<json:string>CUCO, 1997</json:string>
<json:string>Morley and Walsh, 1996, p. 3</json:string>
<json:string>CVCP, 2000</json:string>
<json:string>Wager, 1998, p. 242</json:string>
<json:string>Clarke et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Salisbury and Riddell (2000)</json:string>
<json:string>see Williams, 2000</json:string>
<json:string>Hermans, 1988, p. 785</json:string>
<json:string>Walsh (2002)</json:string>
<json:string>Smith, 1995, p. 61</json:string>
<json:string>Clarke, 2000, p. 183</json:string>
<json:string>Bett, 1999</json:string>
<json:string>Powney, 1997</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark>
<json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-Z37PCJDS-7</json:string>
</ark>
<categories>
<wos></wos>
<scienceMetrix></scienceMetrix>
<scopus>
<json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Education</json:string>
</scopus>
<inist>
<json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string>
<json:string>2 - sciences de l'education</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2002</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2002</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/1468-2273.00226</json:string>
</doi>
<id>B0D49716440865F3CE36711532EC427387CE51A2</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B0D49716440865F3CE36711532EC427387CE51A2/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B0D49716440865F3CE36711532EC427387CE51A2/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B0D49716440865F3CE36711532EC427387CE51A2/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main">Women, Academia and Identity: Constructions of Equal Opportunities in the ‘New Managerialism’– A Case of ‘Lipstick on the Gorilla’?</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp>
<name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace>
<availability>
<licence>Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2002</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="2002-10"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="article">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Women, Academia and Identity: Constructions of Equal Opportunities in the ‘New Managerialism’– A Case of ‘Lipstick on the Gorilla’?</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Wendy</forename>
<surname>Saunderson</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>University of Ulster, Coleraine</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">B0D49716440865F3CE36711532EC427387CE51A2</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-Z37PCJDS-7</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/1468-2273.00226</idno>
<idno type="unit">HEQU226</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:HEQU.HEQU226.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j" type="main">Higher Education Quarterly</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0951-5224</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-2273</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2273</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/hequ.2002.56.issue-4</idno>
<idno type="product">HEQU</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">56</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="376">376</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="406">406</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">31</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2002-10"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<abstract xml:lang="en" style="main">
<p>This paper has two distinct foci. The first is an introductory focus on the current position and problems of academic women working in UK universities (despite the valorization of Equal Opportunities (EO), and within the context and constraints of the ‘New Managerialism’). The second and main focus is on the personal impact of university work on the lives of academic women, towards exploring and uncovering how higher education’s institutional structures and processes impact upon academic women’s identity structures and processes. Idiographic analyses of a small number of case studies suggest that despite considerable recent gains, some academic women’s identities are compromised, challenged and made ‘vulnerable’ through feelings of being undervalued, overburdened and often the subjects of unequal treatment – more than 30 years after the Equal Pay Act and almost 30 years after the Sex Discrimination Act. The paper’s conclusions therefore warn that continued valorization of EO policy without its assimilation into the underlying core institutional culture will sanction the valediction of any tangible or effective progress in HE’s ability to produce more robust academic identities and more satisfying daily working lives for academic women. Insofar as such assimilation is not achieved, the policy, practice and rhetoric of equal opportunities and equal treatment in UK higher education will remain little more than ‘lipstick on the gorilla’.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1">
<term>Original Articles</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change>undefined</change>
<change>[object Object]</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B0D49716440865F3CE36711532EC427387CE51A2/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document>
<component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en">
<header>
<publicationMeta level="product">
<publisherInfo>
<publisherName>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2273</doi>
<issn type="print">0951-5224</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1468-2273</issn>
<idGroup>
<id type="product" value="HEQU"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main" sort="HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY">Higher Education Quarterly</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="10004">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/hequ.2002.56.issue-4</doi>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="journalVolume" number="56">56</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2002-10">October 2002</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0037600" status="forIssue">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/1468-2273.00226</doi>
<idGroup>
<id type="unit" value="HEQU226"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup>
<count type="pageTotal" number="31"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2002</copyright>
<eventGroup>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2003-02-11"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2003-02-11"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-06"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-26"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="pageFirst" number="376">376</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="406">406</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<linkGroup>
<link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:HEQU.HEQU226.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta>
<countGroup>
<count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main">Women, Academia and Identity: Constructions of Equal Opportunities in the ‘New Managerialism’– A Case of ‘Lipstick on the Gorilla’?</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1">
<personName>
<givenNames>Wendy</givenNames>
<familyName>Saunderson</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup>
<affiliation xml:id="a1">
<unparsedAffiliation>University of Ulster, Coleraine</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<abstractGroup>
<abstract type="main" xml:lang="en">
<p>This paper has two distinct foci. The first is an introductory focus on the current position and problems of academic women working in UK universities (despite the valorization of Equal Opportunities (EO), and within the context and constraints of the ‘New Managerialism’). The second and main focus is on the personal impact of university work on the lives of academic women, towards exploring and uncovering how higher education’s institutional structures and processes impact upon academic women’s identity structures and processes. Idiographic analyses of a small number of case studies suggest that despite considerable recent gains, some academic women’s identities are compromised, challenged and made ‘vulnerable’ through feelings of being undervalued, overburdened and often the subjects of unequal treatment – more than 30 years after the Equal Pay Act and almost 30 years after the Sex Discrimination Act. The paper’s conclusions therefore warn that continued valorization of EO policy without its assimilation into the underlying core institutional culture will sanction the valediction of any tangible or effective progress in HE’s ability to produce more robust academic identities and more satisfying daily working lives for academic women. Insofar as such assimilation is not achieved, the policy, practice and rhetoric of equal opportunities and equal treatment in UK higher education will remain little more than ‘lipstick on the gorilla’.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Women, Academia and Identity: Constructions of Equal Opportunities in the ‘New Managerialism’– A Case of ‘Lipstick on the Gorilla’?</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en">
<title>Women, Academia and Identity: Constructions of Equal Opportunities in the ‘New Managerialism’– A Case of ‘Lipstick on the Gorilla’?</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Wendy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Saunderson</namePart>
<affiliation>University of Ulster, Coleraine</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-10</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<extent unit="figures">0</extent>
<extent unit="tables">0</extent>
<extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">This paper has two distinct foci. The first is an introductory focus on the current position and problems of academic women working in UK universities (despite the valorization of Equal Opportunities (EO), and within the context and constraints of the ‘New Managerialism’). The second and main focus is on the personal impact of university work on the lives of academic women, towards exploring and uncovering how higher education’s institutional structures and processes impact upon academic women’s identity structures and processes. Idiographic analyses of a small number of case studies suggest that despite considerable recent gains, some academic women’s identities are compromised, challenged and made ‘vulnerable’ through feelings of being undervalued, overburdened and often the subjects of unequal treatment – more than 30 years after the Equal Pay Act and almost 30 years after the Sex Discrimination Act. The paper’s conclusions therefore warn that continued valorization of EO policy without its assimilation into the underlying core institutional culture will sanction the valediction of any tangible or effective progress in HE’s ability to produce more robust academic identities and more satisfying daily working lives for academic women. Insofar as such assimilation is not achieved, the policy, practice and rhetoric of equal opportunities and equal treatment in UK higher education will remain little more than ‘lipstick on the gorilla’.</abstract>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Higher Education Quarterly</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0951-5224</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1468-2273</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2273</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">HEQU</identifier>
<part>
<date>2002</date>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>56</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<caption>no.</caption>
<number>4</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>376</start>
<end>406</end>
<total>31</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">B0D49716440865F3CE36711532EC427387CE51A2</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-Z37PCJDS-7</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/1468-2273.00226</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">HEQU226</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2002</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B0D49716440865F3CE36711532EC427387CE51A2/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005835 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005835 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:B0D49716440865F3CE36711532EC427387CE51A2
   |texte=   Women, Academia and Identity: Constructions of Equal Opportunities in the ‘New Managerialism’– A Case of ‘Lipstick on the Gorilla’?
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022