The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone‐implant contact revisited: an experiment in Beagle dog
Identifieur interne : 005831 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005830; suivant : 005832The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone‐implant contact revisited: an experiment in Beagle dog
Auteurs : Carolina Manresa ; Manel Bosch ; José J. EcheverríaSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2014-11.
Abstract
Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is applied clinically for the assessment of implant stability, and the relevance of this application is widely accepted. However, the relationship between resonance frequency (RF) and other parameters of implant stability, such as the histomorphometrical bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) parameter, has become controversial in the last decade.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12256
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:B0CF5575DEFE6FDB8A7349FED862CF41BC093227Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone‐implant contact revisited: an experiment in Beagle dog</title><author><name sortKey="Manresa, Carolina" sort="Manresa, Carolina" uniqKey="Manresa C" first="Carolina" last="Manresa">Carolina Manresa</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Departament d'Odontoestomatologia, Odontologia Integrada d'Adults, Facultat d'Odontologia, Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Facultat d'OdontologíaCampus de Bellvitge, Universitat de BarcelonaFeixa Llarga, s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de LlobregatBarcelona, SpainTel.: +34 934024289Fax: +34 934024248e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: cmanresa@ub.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bosch, Manel" sort="Bosch, Manel" uniqKey="Bosch M" first="Manel" last="Bosch">Manel Bosch</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Unitat de Microscòpia Òptica Avançada, Centres Científics i Tecnològics de la Universitat de Barcelona (CCiTUB), Barcelona, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Echeverria, Jose J" sort="Echeverria, Jose J" uniqKey="Echeverria J" first="José J." last="Echeverría">José J. Echeverría</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Departament d'Odontoestomatologia, Odontologia Integrada d'Adults, Facultat d'Odontologia, Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B0CF5575DEFE6FDB8A7349FED862CF41BC093227</idno><date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/clr.12256</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B0CF5575DEFE6FDB8A7349FED862CF41BC093227/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005831</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005831</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone‐implant contact revisited: an experiment in <hi rend="fc">B</hi>eagle dog</title><author><name sortKey="Manresa, Carolina" sort="Manresa, Carolina" uniqKey="Manresa C" first="Carolina" last="Manresa">Carolina Manresa</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Departament d'Odontoestomatologia, Odontologia Integrada d'Adults, Facultat d'Odontologia, Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Facultat d'OdontologíaCampus de Bellvitge, Universitat de BarcelonaFeixa Llarga, s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de LlobregatBarcelona, SpainTel.: +34 934024289Fax: +34 934024248e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: cmanresa@ub.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bosch, Manel" sort="Bosch, Manel" uniqKey="Bosch M" first="Manel" last="Bosch">Manel Bosch</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Unitat de Microscòpia Òptica Avançada, Centres Científics i Tecnològics de la Universitat de Barcelona (CCiTUB), Barcelona, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Echeverria, Jose J" sort="Echeverria, Jose J" uniqKey="Echeverria J" first="José J." last="Echeverría">José J. Echeverría</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Departament d'Odontoestomatologia, Odontologia Integrada d'Adults, Facultat d'Odontologia, Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1213">1213</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1221">1221</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-11">2014-11</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is applied clinically for the assessment of implant stability, and the relevance of this application is widely accepted. However, the relationship between resonance frequency (RF) and other parameters of implant stability, such as the histomorphometrical bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) parameter, has become controversial in the last decade.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Carolina Manresa</name><affiliations><json:string>Departament d'Odontoestomatologia, Odontologia Integrada d'Adults, Facultat d'Odontologia, Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain</json:string><json:string>Facultat d'OdontologíaCampus de Bellvitge, Universitat de BarcelonaFeixa Llarga, s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de LlobregatBarcelona, SpainTel.: +34 934024289Fax: +34 934024248e‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: cmanresa@ub.edu</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Manel Bosch</name><affiliations><json:string>Unitat de Microscòpia Òptica Avançada, Centres Científics i Tecnològics de la Universitat de Barcelona (CCiTUB), Barcelona, Spain</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>José J. Echeverría</name><affiliations><json:string>Departament d'Odontoestomatologia, Odontologia Integrada d'Adults, Facultat d'Odontologia, Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>backscattered scanning electron microscopy</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone‐to‐implant contact</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>histomorphometric analysis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant stability</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osseointegration</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>resonance frequency</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR12256</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-XC0CHWSJ-M</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is applied clinically for the assessment of implant stability, and the relevance of this application is widely accepted. However, the relationship between resonance frequency (RF) and other parameters of implant stability, such as the histomorphometrical bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) parameter, has become controversial in the last decade.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>50</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>375</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount><score>7.6</score><pdfWordCount>6622</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>43341</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.6</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone‐implant contact revisited: an experiment in Beagle dog</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>25</volume><issue>11</issue><pages><first>1213</first><last>1221</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-XC0CHWSJ-M</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2014</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2014</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/clr.12256</json:string></doi><id>B0CF5575DEFE6FDB8A7349FED862CF41BC093227</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B0CF5575DEFE6FDB8A7349FED862CF41BC093227/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B0CF5575DEFE6FDB8A7349FED862CF41BC093227/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B0CF5575DEFE6FDB8A7349FED862CF41BC093227/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone‐implant contact revisited: an experiment in <hi rend="fc">B</hi>eagle dog</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2014-11"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone‐implant contact revisited: an experiment in <hi rend="fc">B</hi>eagle dog</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Carolina</forename><surname>Manresa</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Departament d'Odontoestomatologia, Odontologia Integrada d'Adults</orgName><orgName>Facultat d'Odontologia</orgName><orgName>Campus de Bellvitge</orgName><orgName>Universitat de Barcelona</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Barcelona</settlement><country key="ES">Spain</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author: Carolina Manresa Facultat d'Odontología Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona Feixa Llarga, s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain Tel.: +34 934024289 Fax: +34 934024248 e‐mail: cmanresa@ub.edu</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Manel</forename><surname>Bosch</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Unitat de Microscòpia Òptica Avançada</orgName><orgName>Centres Científics i Tecnològics de la Universitat de Barcelona (CCiTUB)</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Barcelona</settlement><country key="ES">Spain</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">José J.</forename><surname>Echeverría</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Departament d'Odontoestomatologia, Odontologia Integrada d'Adults</orgName><orgName>Facultat d'Odontologia</orgName><orgName>Campus de Bellvitge</orgName><orgName>Universitat de Barcelona</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Barcelona</settlement><country key="ES">Spain</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">B0CF5575DEFE6FDB8A7349FED862CF41BC093227</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-XC0CHWSJ-M</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/clr.12256</idno><idno type="unit">CLR12256</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR12256.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2014.25.issue-11</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1213">1213</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1221">1221</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-11"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="clr12256-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Background
<p>Resonance frequency analysis (<hi rend="fc">RFA</hi>) is applied clinically for the assessment of implant stability, and the relevance of this application is widely accepted. However, the relationship between resonance frequency (<hi rend="fc">RF</hi>) and other parameters of implant stability, such as the histomorphometrical bone‐to‐implant contact (<hi rend="fc">BIC</hi>) parameter, has become controversial in the last decade.</p>
Objective
<p>To analyse and clarify the controversial relationship between <hi rend="fc">RF</hi> and histomorphometrical <hi rend="fc">BIC</hi> measurements.</p>
Material and methods
<p>A total of 36 dental implants (9 mm length, Ø 4.0 mm; Biohorizons<hi rend="superscript">®</hi> Implant Systems Inc., <hi rend="fc">B</hi>irmingham, <hi rend="fc">AL</hi>,<hi rend="fc"> USA</hi>) with a <hi rend="fc">soluble blasting media</hi> (sandblasting with soluble particles) surface were implanted in six beagle dog mandibles. <hi rend="fc">RFA</hi> assessments were performed with a magnetic <hi rend="fc">O</hi>sstel <hi rend="fc">M</hi>entor<hi rend="superscript">®</hi> device at the time of implant installation, and during the monitoring period at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8, before implant retrieval. The dogs were sacrificed and the implants were removed in block after 8, 6, 4, 2, 1 and 0 weeks, respectively. One group was obtained at time 0, immediately after the implantation. The samples were embedded in methyl methacrylate polymers (<hi rend="fc">T</hi>echnovit<hi rend="superscript">®</hi>) and cut along their long axis. <hi rend="fc">BIC</hi> values were assessed by a non‐subjective and systematic method based on backscattered scanning electron microscopy (<hi rend="fc">BS</hi>‐<hi rend="fc">SEM</hi>) images. <hi rend="fc">BIC</hi>% at the different time points was compared with the corresponding <hi rend="fc">i</hi>mplant <hi rend="fc">s</hi>tability <hi rend="fc">q</hi>uotient (<hi rend="fc">ISQ</hi>) values of the <hi rend="fc">RFA</hi> assessment.</p>
Results
<p>No statistically significant correlation between <hi rend="fc">BIC</hi> and <hi rend="fc">ISQ</hi> values (<hi rend="fc">O</hi>sstell <hi rend="fc">M</hi>entor<hi rend="superscript">®</hi>) was identified. The absence of a relationship between these two parameters is in agreement with several previous studies in humans and experimental animals.</p>
Conclusions
<p>The lack of correlation between <hi rend="fc">BIC</hi> and <hi rend="fc">ISQ</hi> values suggests that <hi rend="fc">ISQ</hi> as determined by <hi rend="fc">RFA</hi> is not able to identify the relationship between <hi rend="fc">RF</hi> and histomorphometrical data.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="clr12256-kwd-0001">backscattered scanning electron microscopy</term><term xml:id="clr12256-kwd-0002">bone‐to‐implant contact</term><term xml:id="clr12256-kwd-0003">histomorphometric analysis</term><term xml:id="clr12256-kwd-0004">implant stability</term><term xml:id="clr12256-kwd-0005">osseointegration</term><term xml:id="clr12256-kwd-0006">resonance frequency</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="clr12256" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title type="short">Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="110"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2014.25.issue-11</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="25">25</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">11</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2014-11">November 2014</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="10" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/clr.12256</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR12256"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="9" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2013-08-04" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-08-20" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.3.5 mode:FullText" date="2014-10-03"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2013-09-19"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-09-19"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2014-10-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-06"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">1213</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">1221</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line><b>Corresponding author:</b></line><line><i>Carolina Manresa</i></line><line>Facultat d'Odontología</line><line>Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona</line><line>Feixa Llarga, s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat</line><line>Barcelona, Spain</line><line>Tel.: +34 934024289</line><line>Fax: +34 934024248</line><line>e‐mail: <email>cmanresa@ub.edu</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="clr12256-cit-1001"><author><familyName>Manresa</familyName> <givenNames>C</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Bosch</familyName> <givenNames>M</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Echeverría</familyName> <givenNames>JJ</givenNames></author>. <articleTitle>The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone‐implant contact revisited: an experiment in Beagle dog</articleTitle>. <journalTitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</journalTitle> <vol>25</vol>, <pubYear year="2014">2014</pubYear>, <pageFirst>1213</pageFirst>–<pageLast>1221</pageLast> doi: <accessionId ref="info:doi/10.1111/clr.12256">10.1111/clr.12256</accessionId></citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR12256.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone‐implant contact revisited: an experiment in <fc>B</fc>eagle dog</title><title type="shortAuthors">Manresa et al.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#clr12256-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12256-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Carolina</givenNames> <familyName>Manresa</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr12256-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12256-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Manel</givenNames> <familyName>Bosch</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr12256-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12256-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>José J.</givenNames> <familyName>Echeverría</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="ES" type="organization" xml:id="clr12256-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Departament d'Odontoestomatologia, Odontologia Integrada d'Adults</orgDiv> <orgDiv>Facultat d'Odontologia</orgDiv> <orgName>Campus de Bellvitge</orgName> <orgName>Universitat de Barcelona</orgName> <address><city>Barcelona</city> <country>Spain</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="ES" type="organization" xml:id="clr12256-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Unitat de Microscòpia Òptica Avançada</orgDiv> <orgName>Centres Científics i Tecnològics de la Universitat de Barcelona (CCiTUB)</orgName> <address><city>Barcelona</city> <country>Spain</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="clr12256-kwd-0001">backscattered scanning electron microscopy</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12256-kwd-0002">bone‐to‐implant contact</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12256-kwd-0003">histomorphometric analysis</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12256-kwd-0004">implant stability</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12256-kwd-0005">osseointegration</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12256-kwd-0006">resonance frequency</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>Biohorizons Inc</fundingAgency></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="clr12256-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="clr12256-sec-0001"><title type="main">Background</title><p>Resonance frequency analysis (<fc>RFA</fc>) is applied clinically for the assessment of implant stability, and the relevance of this application is widely accepted. However, the relationship between resonance frequency (<fc>RF</fc>) and other parameters of implant stability, such as the histomorphometrical bone‐to‐implant contact (<fc>BIC</fc>) parameter, has become controversial in the last decade.</p></section><section xml:id="clr12256-sec-0002"><title type="main">Objective</title><p>To analyse and clarify the controversial relationship between <fc>RF</fc> and histomorphometrical <fc>BIC</fc> measurements.</p></section><section xml:id="clr12256-sec-0003"><title type="main">Material and methods</title><p>A total of 36 dental implants (9 mm length, Ø 4.0 mm; Biohorizons<sup>®</sup> Implant Systems Inc., <fc>B</fc>irmingham, <fc>AL</fc>,<fc> USA</fc>) with a <fc>soluble blasting media</fc> (sandblasting with soluble particles) surface were implanted in six beagle dog mandibles. <fc>RFA</fc> assessments were performed with a magnetic <fc>O</fc>sstel <fc>M</fc>entor<sup>®</sup> device at the time of implant installation, and during the monitoring period at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8, before implant retrieval. The dogs were sacrificed and the implants were removed in block after 8, 6, 4, 2, 1 and 0 weeks, respectively. One group was obtained at time 0, immediately after the implantation. The samples were embedded in methyl methacrylate polymers (<fc>T</fc>echnovit<sup>®</sup>) and cut along their long axis. <fc>BIC</fc> values were assessed by a non‐subjective and systematic method based on backscattered scanning electron microscopy (<fc>BS</fc>‐<fc>SEM</fc>) images. <fc>BIC</fc>% at the different time points was compared with the corresponding <fc>i</fc>mplant <fc>s</fc>tability <fc>q</fc>uotient (<fc>ISQ</fc>) values of the <fc>RFA</fc> assessment.</p></section><section xml:id="clr12256-sec-0004"><title type="main">Results</title><p>No statistically significant correlation between <fc>BIC</fc> and <fc>ISQ</fc> values (<fc>O</fc>sstell <fc>M</fc>entor<sup>®</sup>) was identified. The absence of a relationship between these two parameters is in agreement with several previous studies in humans and experimental animals.</p></section><section xml:id="clr12256-sec-0005"><title type="main">Conclusions</title><p>The lack of correlation between <fc>BIC</fc> and <fc>ISQ</fc> values suggests that <fc>ISQ</fc> as determined by <fc>RFA</fc> is not able to identify the relationship between <fc>RF</fc> and histomorphometrical data.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone‐implant contact revisited: an experiment in Beagle dog</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone‐implant contact revisited: an experiment in Beagle dog</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Carolina</namePart><namePart type="family">Manresa</namePart><affiliation>Departament d'Odontoestomatologia, Odontologia Integrada d'Adults, Facultat d'Odontologia, Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain</affiliation><affiliation>Facultat d'OdontologíaCampus de Bellvitge, Universitat de BarcelonaFeixa Llarga, s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de LlobregatBarcelona, SpainTel.: +34 934024289Fax: +34 934024248e‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: cmanresa@ub.edu</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Manel</namePart><namePart type="family">Bosch</namePart><affiliation>Unitat de Microscòpia Òptica Avançada, Centres Científics i Tecnològics de la Universitat de Barcelona (CCiTUB), Barcelona, Spain</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">José J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Echeverría</namePart><affiliation>Departament d'Odontoestomatologia, Odontologia Integrada d'Adults, Facultat d'Odontologia, Campus de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2014-11</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-08-20</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2013-08-04</dateValid><edition>Manresa C, Bosch M, Echeverría JJ. The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone‐implant contact revisited: an experiment in Beagle dog. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 25, 2014, 1213–1221 doi: 10.1111/clr.12256</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is applied clinically for the assessment of implant stability, and the relevance of this application is widely accepted. However, the relationship between resonance frequency (RF) and other parameters of implant stability, such as the histomorphometrical bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) parameter, has become controversial in the last decade.</abstract><abstract>To analyse and clarify the controversial relationship between RF and histomorphometrical BIC measurements.</abstract><abstract>A total of 36 dental implants (9 mm length, Ø 4.0 mm; Biohorizons® Implant Systems Inc., Birmingham, AL, USA) with a soluble blasting media (sandblasting with soluble particles) surface were implanted in six beagle dog mandibles. RFA assessments were performed with a magnetic Osstel Mentor® device at the time of implant installation, and during the monitoring period at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8, before implant retrieval. The dogs were sacrificed and the implants were removed in block after 8, 6, 4, 2, 1 and 0 weeks, respectively. One group was obtained at time 0, immediately after the implantation. The samples were embedded in methyl methacrylate polymers (Technovit®) and cut along their long axis. BIC values were assessed by a non‐subjective and systematic method based on backscattered scanning electron microscopy (BS‐SEM) images. BIC% at the different time points was compared with the corresponding implant stability quotient (ISQ) values of the RFA assessment.</abstract><abstract>No statistically significant correlation between BIC and ISQ values (Osstell Mentor®) was identified. The absence of a relationship between these two parameters is in agreement with several previous studies in humans and experimental animals.</abstract><abstract>The lack of correlation between BIC and ISQ values suggests that ISQ as determined by RFA is not able to identify the relationship between RF and histomorphometrical data.</abstract><note type="funding">Biohorizons Inc</note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>backscattered scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>bone‐to‐implant contact</topic><topic>histomorphometric analysis</topic><topic>implant stability</topic><topic>osseointegration</topic><topic>resonance frequency</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2014</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>25</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>11</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1213</start><end>1221</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">B0CF5575DEFE6FDB8A7349FED862CF41BC093227</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-XC0CHWSJ-M</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/clr.12256</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR12256</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B0CF5575DEFE6FDB8A7349FED862CF41BC093227/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005831 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005831 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:B0CF5575DEFE6FDB8A7349FED862CF41BC093227
|texte= The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone‐implant contact revisited: an experiment in Beagle dog
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |