Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems
Identifieur interne : 005672 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005671; suivant : 005673Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems
Auteurs : Tiago De Morais Alves Da Cunha ; Roberto Paulo Correia De Araújo ; Paulo Vicente Barbosa Da Rocha ; Rosa Maria Pazos AmoedoSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2012-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Biocare, Bone response, Central area, Ceramic abutments, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Current study, Dent, Dental implants, Different manufacturers, Experimental group, Experimental groups, Federal university, Horizontal discrepancies, Ideal level, Implant, Implant systems, Implants sistema, Interface, Master screw, Microbial colonization, Microgap, Morais alves, Nite element analysis, Nobel biocare, Occlusal forces, Oral maxillofac implants, Other implant systems, Pairwise comparison, Photoelastic analysis, Procera, Procera abutment, Procera abutments, Procera custom abutments, Procera zirconia abutment, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Right edges, Same manufacturer, Single prosthesis, Standard deviations, Statistical analysis, Statistical differences, Stress distribution, Stress transfer, System implants, Vivo study, Zirconia, Zirconia abutments, Zirconia procera abutment.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Biocare, Bone response, Central area, Ceramic abutments, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Current study, Dent, Dental implants, Different manufacturers, Experimental group, Experimental groups, Federal university, Horizontal discrepancies, Ideal level, Implant, Implant systems, Implants sistema, Interface, Master screw, Microbial colonization, Microgap, Morais alves, Nite element analysis, Nobel biocare, Occlusal forces, Oral maxillofac implants, Other implant systems, Pairwise comparison, Photoelastic analysis, Procera, Procera abutment, Procera abutments, Procera custom abutments, Procera zirconia abutment, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Right edges, Same manufacturer, Single prosthesis, Standard deviations, Statistical analysis, Statistical differences, Stress distribution, Stress transfer, System implants, Vivo study, Zirconia, Zirconia abutments, Zirconia procera abutment.
Abstract
Background: Although increase of misfit has been reported when associating implant and abutment from different manufacturers, Procera® (Nobel Biocare™, Göteborg, Sweden) custom abutment has been universally used in clinical practice.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00311.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:ADD91BE3583E538328FFC5374E11802FC26CC619Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title><author><name sortKey="Alves Da Cunha, Tiago De Morais" sort="Alves Da Cunha, Tiago De Morais" uniqKey="Alves Da Cunha T" first="Tiago De Morais" last="Alves Da Cunha">Tiago De Morais Alves Da Cunha</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: tiagoalvescunha@hotmail.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Correia De Araujo, Roberto Paulo" sort="Correia De Araujo, Roberto Paulo" uniqKey="Correia De Araujo R" first="Roberto Paulo" last="Correia De Araújo">Roberto Paulo Correia De Araújo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Barbosa Da Rocha, Paulo Vicente" sort="Barbosa Da Rocha, Paulo Vicente" uniqKey="Barbosa Da Rocha P" first="Paulo Vicente" last="Barbosa Da Rocha">Paulo Vicente Barbosa Da Rocha</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>adjunct professor of prosthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pazos Amoedo, Rosa Maria" sort="Pazos Amoedo, Rosa Maria" uniqKey="Pazos Amoedo R" first="Rosa Maria" last="Pazos Amoedo">Rosa Maria Pazos Amoedo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:ADD91BE3583E538328FFC5374E11802FC26CC619</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00311.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/ADD91BE3583E538328FFC5374E11802FC26CC619/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005672</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005672</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title><author><name sortKey="Alves Da Cunha, Tiago De Morais" sort="Alves Da Cunha, Tiago De Morais" uniqKey="Alves Da Cunha T" first="Tiago De Morais" last="Alves Da Cunha">Tiago De Morais Alves Da Cunha</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: tiagoalvescunha@hotmail.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Correia De Araujo, Roberto Paulo" sort="Correia De Araujo, Roberto Paulo" uniqKey="Correia De Araujo R" first="Roberto Paulo" last="Correia De Araújo">Roberto Paulo Correia De Araújo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Barbosa Da Rocha, Paulo Vicente" sort="Barbosa Da Rocha, Paulo Vicente" uniqKey="Barbosa Da Rocha P" first="Paulo Vicente" last="Barbosa Da Rocha">Paulo Vicente Barbosa Da Rocha</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>adjunct professor of prosthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pazos Amoedo, Rosa Maria" sort="Pazos Amoedo, Rosa Maria" uniqKey="Pazos Amoedo R" first="Rosa Maria" last="Pazos Amoedo">Rosa Maria Pazos Amoedo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="772">772</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="777">777</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-10">2012-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Biocare</term><term>Bone response</term><term>Central area</term><term>Ceramic abutments</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Different manufacturers</term><term>Experimental group</term><term>Experimental groups</term><term>Federal university</term><term>Horizontal discrepancies</term><term>Ideal level</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implants sistema</term><term>Interface</term><term>Master screw</term><term>Microbial colonization</term><term>Microgap</term><term>Morais alves</term><term>Nite element analysis</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Occlusal forces</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Other implant systems</term><term>Pairwise comparison</term><term>Photoelastic analysis</term><term>Procera</term><term>Procera abutment</term><term>Procera abutments</term><term>Procera custom abutments</term><term>Procera zirconia abutment</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Right edges</term><term>Same manufacturer</term><term>Single prosthesis</term><term>Standard deviations</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Statistical differences</term><term>Stress distribution</term><term>Stress transfer</term><term>System implants</term><term>Vivo study</term><term>Zirconia</term><term>Zirconia abutments</term><term>Zirconia procera abutment</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Biocare</term><term>Bone response</term><term>Central area</term><term>Ceramic abutments</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Different manufacturers</term><term>Experimental group</term><term>Experimental groups</term><term>Federal university</term><term>Horizontal discrepancies</term><term>Ideal level</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implants sistema</term><term>Interface</term><term>Master screw</term><term>Microbial colonization</term><term>Microgap</term><term>Morais alves</term><term>Nite element analysis</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Occlusal forces</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Other implant systems</term><term>Pairwise comparison</term><term>Photoelastic analysis</term><term>Procera</term><term>Procera abutment</term><term>Procera abutments</term><term>Procera custom abutments</term><term>Procera zirconia abutment</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Right edges</term><term>Same manufacturer</term><term>Single prosthesis</term><term>Standard deviations</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Statistical differences</term><term>Stress distribution</term><term>Stress transfer</term><term>System implants</term><term>Vivo study</term><term>Zirconia</term><term>Zirconia abutments</term><term>Zirconia procera abutment</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: Although increase of misfit has been reported when associating implant and abutment from different manufacturers, Procera® (Nobel Biocare™, Göteborg, Sweden) custom abutment has been universally used in clinical practice.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>procera</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>biocare</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>zirconia</json:string><json:string>procera abutment</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>prosthet</json:string><json:string>microgap</json:string><json:string>implant systems</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>other implant systems</json:string><json:string>procera custom abutments</json:string><json:string>stress distribution</json:string><json:string>nite element analysis</json:string><json:string>right edges</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>interface</json:string><json:string>central area</json:string><json:string>statistical analysis</json:string><json:string>current study</json:string><json:string>horizontal discrepancies</json:string><json:string>different manufacturers</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>procera abutments</json:string><json:string>experimental groups</json:string><json:string>zirconia abutments</json:string><json:string>experimental group</json:string><json:string>standard deviations</json:string><json:string>pairwise comparison</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>zirconia procera abutment</json:string><json:string>statistical differences</json:string><json:string>procera zirconia abutment</json:string><json:string>same manufacturer</json:string><json:string>photoelastic analysis</json:string><json:string>bone response</json:string><json:string>ideal level</json:string><json:string>federal university</json:string><json:string>occlusal forces</json:string><json:string>stress transfer</json:string><json:string>single prosthesis</json:string><json:string>microbial colonization</json:string><json:string>master screw</json:string><json:string>implants sistema</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>morais alves</json:string><json:string>vivo study</json:string><json:string>system implants</json:string><json:string>ceramic abutments</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Tiago de Morais Alves da Cunha</name><affiliations><json:string>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Brazil;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: tiagoalvescunha@hotmail.com</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Roberto Paulo Correia de Araújo</name><affiliations><json:string>associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Paulo Vicente Barbosa da Rocha</name><affiliations><json:string>adjunct professor of prosthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Rosa Maria Pazos Amoedo</name><affiliations><json:string>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Brazil;</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐supported prosthesis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>misfit</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>prosthodontic planning</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID311</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-SVSVQD1W-M</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Although increase of misfit has been reported when associating implant and abutment from different manufacturers, Procera® (Nobel Biocare™, Göteborg, Sweden) custom abutment has been universally used in clinical practice.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.193</score><pdfWordCount>2833</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>18847</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>30</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>233</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title><pmid><json:string>20977612</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>772</first><last>777</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Brazil Reprint</json:string><json:string>Implant Systems</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Nobel Biocare</json:string><json:string>Zimmer Dental Inc.</json:string><json:string>Federal University</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Brazil</json:string><json:string>Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Piattelli</json:string><json:string>Jansen</json:string><json:string>Carlos Magalhães</json:string><json:string>Paulo Vicente</json:string><json:string>Tiago de Morais</json:string><json:string>Rosa Maria</json:string><json:string>Roberto Paulo</json:string><json:string>Assunção</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Carlsbad</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Brazil</json:string><json:string>Austria</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>CA</json:string><json:string>Palm Beach</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>São Paulo</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-SVSVQD1W-M</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00311.x</json:string></doi><id>ADD91BE3583E538328FFC5374E11802FC26CC619</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ADD91BE3583E538328FFC5374E11802FC26CC619/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ADD91BE3583E538328FFC5374E11802FC26CC619/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/ADD91BE3583E538328FFC5374E11802FC26CC619/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title><title level="a" type="short">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Tiago de Morais</forename><surname>Alves da Cunha</surname></persName><affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Brazil;<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Professor Tiago de Morais Alves da Cunha, Antônio Carlos Magalhães, 3359, Ap 1104N, Salvador, BA, 41800‐700, Brazil; e‐mail: tiagoalvescunha@hotmail.com</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Roberto Paulo</forename><surname>Correia de Araújo</surname></persName><affiliation>associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Paulo Vicente</forename><surname>Barbosa da Rocha</surname></persName><affiliation>adjunct professor of prosthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Rosa Maria</forename><surname>Pazos Amoedo</surname></persName><affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Brazil;<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">ADD91BE3583E538328FFC5374E11802FC26CC619</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SVSVQD1W-M</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00311.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID311</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID311.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="772">772</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="777">777</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi> Although increase of misfit has been reported when associating implant and abutment from different manufacturers, Procera® (Nobel Biocare™, Göteborg, Sweden) custom abutment has been universally used in clinical practice.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> The purpose of this investigation was to compare the vertical gap of zirconia Procera abutment associated with implants from the same manufacturer (Nobel Biocare) and two other implant systems.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Twenty‐four zirconia Procera abutments were produced using computer‐assisted design and manufacture (CAD/CAM) and paired with (1) eight MK Iii RP 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Nobel Biocare) – GNB group; (2) eight Try on, 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Sistema de Implantes, São Paulo, Brazil) – ES group; and (3) eight Master screw, 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Conexão Sistema de Prótese, São Paulo, Brazil) – EC group. A comparison of the vertical misfit at the implant‐abutment interface was taken at six measuring sites on each sample using scanning electron microscopy with a magnification of 408×. One‐way analysis of variance was used to test for differences, and Tukey's test was used for pairwise comparison of groups (α = 0.05).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> Significant differences relative to average misfit were found when Procera abutments were associated with other implant manufacturers. The ES group and EC group did not differ significantly, but both demonstrated significantly larger average misfit than the GNB group (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .001). The average misfit was 5.7 µm ± 0.39, 9.53 µm ± 0.52 and 10.62 µm ± 2.16, respectively, for groups GNB, ES, and EC.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi> The association of Procera zirconia abutment with other implant systems different from its manufacturer demonstrated significant alteration of vertical misfit at implant‐abutment interface.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k2">implant‐supported prosthesis</term><term xml:id="k3">misfit</term><term xml:id="k4">prosthodontic planning</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ADD91BE3583E538328FFC5374E11802FC26CC619/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10105"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-10">October 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="16" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00311.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID311"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.2.2 mode:FullText" date="2013-05-06"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-10-26"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-10-01"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-10-26"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="772">772</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="777">777</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Professor Tiago de Morais Alves da Cunha, Antônio Carlos Magalhães, 3359, Ap 1104N, Salvador, BA, 41800‐700, Brazil; e‐mail: <email>tiagoalvescunha@hotmail.com</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID311.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="32"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="3290"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2010</title><title type="short">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Tiago de Morais</givenNames><familyName>Alves da Cunha</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Roberto Paulo</givenNames><familyName>Correia de Araújo</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Paulo Vicente</givenNames><familyName>Barbosa da Rocha</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Rosa Maria</givenNames><familyName>Pazos Amoedo</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Brazil;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>adjunct professor of prosthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implant‐supported prosthesis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">misfit</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">prosthodontic planning</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background:</b> Although increase of misfit has been reported when associating implant and abutment from different manufacturers, Procera® (Nobel Biocare™, Göteborg, Sweden) custom abutment has been universally used in clinical practice.</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this investigation was to compare the vertical gap of zirconia Procera abutment associated with implants from the same manufacturer (Nobel Biocare) and two other implant systems.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Twenty‐four zirconia Procera abutments were produced using computer‐assisted design and manufacture (CAD/CAM) and paired with (1) eight MK Iii RP 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Nobel Biocare) – GNB group; (2) eight Try on, 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Sistema de Implantes, São Paulo, Brazil) – ES group; and (3) eight Master screw, 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Conexão Sistema de Prótese, São Paulo, Brazil) – EC group. A comparison of the vertical misfit at the implant‐abutment interface was taken at six measuring sites on each sample using scanning electron microscopy with a magnification of 408×. One‐way analysis of variance was used to test for differences, and Tukey's test was used for pairwise comparison of groups (α = 0.05).</p><p><b>Results:</b> Significant differences relative to average misfit were found when Procera abutments were associated with other implant manufacturers. The ES group and EC group did not differ significantly, but both demonstrated significantly larger average misfit than the GNB group (<i>p</i> = .001). The average misfit was 5.7 µm ± 0.39, 9.53 µm ± 0.52 and 10.62 µm ± 2.16, respectively, for groups GNB, ES, and EC.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The association of Procera zirconia abutment with other implant systems different from its manufacturer demonstrated significant alteration of vertical misfit at implant‐abutment interface.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Tiago de Morais</namePart><namePart type="family">Alves da Cunha</namePart><affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Brazil;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: tiagoalvescunha@hotmail.com</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Roberto Paulo</namePart><namePart type="family">Correia de Araújo</namePart><affiliation>associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Paulo Vicente</namePart><namePart type="family">Barbosa da Rocha</namePart><affiliation>adjunct professor of prosthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rosa Maria</namePart><namePart type="family">Pazos Amoedo</namePart><affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Brazil;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-10</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">4</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">32</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">3290</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: Although increase of misfit has been reported when associating implant and abutment from different manufacturers, Procera® (Nobel Biocare™, Göteborg, Sweden) custom abutment has been universally used in clinical practice.</abstract><abstract>Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the vertical gap of zirconia Procera abutment associated with implants from the same manufacturer (Nobel Biocare) and two other implant systems.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Twenty‐four zirconia Procera abutments were produced using computer‐assisted design and manufacture (CAD/CAM) and paired with (1) eight MK Iii RP 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Nobel Biocare) – GNB group; (2) eight Try on, 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Sistema de Implantes, São Paulo, Brazil) – ES group; and (3) eight Master screw, 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Conexão Sistema de Prótese, São Paulo, Brazil) – EC group. A comparison of the vertical misfit at the implant‐abutment interface was taken at six measuring sites on each sample using scanning electron microscopy with a magnification of 408×. One‐way analysis of variance was used to test for differences, and Tukey's test was used for pairwise comparison of groups (α = 0.05).</abstract><abstract>Results: Significant differences relative to average misfit were found when Procera abutments were associated with other implant manufacturers. The ES group and EC group did not differ significantly, but both demonstrated significantly larger average misfit than the GNB group (p = .001). The average misfit was 5.7 µm ± 0.39, 9.53 µm ± 0.52 and 10.62 µm ± 2.16, respectively, for groups GNB, ES, and EC.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: The association of Procera zirconia abutment with other implant systems different from its manufacturer demonstrated significant alteration of vertical misfit at implant‐abutment interface.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>implant‐supported prosthesis</topic><topic>misfit</topic><topic>prosthodontic planning</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>772</start><end>777</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">ADD91BE3583E538328FFC5374E11802FC26CC619</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SVSVQD1W-M</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00311.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID311</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ADD91BE3583E538328FFC5374E11802FC26CC619/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005672 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005672 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:ADD91BE3583E538328FFC5374E11802FC26CC619
|texte= Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |