Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients
Identifieur interne : 005556 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005555; suivant : 005557Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients
Auteurs : Alexandra Behneke ; Matthias Burwinkel ; Kristian Knierim ; Nikolaus BehnekeSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2012-02.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Accuracy assessment, Accuracy evaluation, Angular deviation, Angular deviations, Apex, Apex depth deviation, Apical, Apical deviations, Augmentation measures, Behneke, Bonferroni test, Cavity preparation, Cbct, Cbct acquisition, Cbct data, Cbct images, Clin, Clinical periodontology, Clinical situation, Cone beam, Conventional templates, Dental arch, Dental laboratory, Dentistry, Dentition, Depth deviation, Deviation, Different kinds, Different regions, Dynamic navigation, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Entry point, Horizontal deviations, Horizontal plane, Image data, Image fusion technique, Impl, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant placement, Implant planning, Implant planning concept, Implant position, Implant positions, Implant shoulder, Implant surgery, Implants research, Institut straumann, International journal, Interquartile range, John wiley sons, John wiley sons behneke, Lego brick, Linear deviations, Long axis, Maximum deviation, Med3d, Med3d planning software, Med3d system, Median, Middle axis, Mucosal punch, Natural teeth, Nobel biocare, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Oral medicine, Oral pathology, Oral radiology, Oral rehabilitation, Oral surgery, Partial edentulism, Percentile, Percentile range, Planning data, Planning stage, Postsurgical cone beam, Present study, Radial deviation, Radial deviations, Randomized selection, Residual dentition, Rigid template material, Safety zone, Shoulder depth deviation, Single tooth, Single tooth gaps, Slice thickness, Soft tissue, Software, Software program, Stereolithographic, Stereolithographic guide systems, Surgical, Surgical guide, Surgical template, Surgical templates, Surgical transfer, Systematic review, Template, Tomography, Tting position, Virtual implant planning, Virtual planning.
- Teeft :
- Accuracy assessment, Accuracy evaluation, Angular deviation, Angular deviations, Apex, Apex depth deviation, Apical, Apical deviations, Augmentation measures, Behneke, Bonferroni test, Cavity preparation, Cbct, Cbct acquisition, Cbct data, Cbct images, Clin, Clinical periodontology, Clinical situation, Cone beam, Conventional templates, Dental arch, Dental laboratory, Dentistry, Dentition, Depth deviation, Deviation, Different kinds, Different regions, Dynamic navigation, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Entry point, Horizontal deviations, Horizontal plane, Image data, Image fusion technique, Impl, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant placement, Implant planning, Implant planning concept, Implant position, Implant positions, Implant shoulder, Implant surgery, Implants research, Institut straumann, International journal, Interquartile range, John wiley sons, John wiley sons behneke, Lego brick, Linear deviations, Long axis, Maximum deviation, Med3d, Med3d planning software, Med3d system, Median, Middle axis, Mucosal punch, Natural teeth, Nobel biocare, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Oral medicine, Oral pathology, Oral radiology, Oral rehabilitation, Oral surgery, Partial edentulism, Percentile, Percentile range, Planning data, Planning stage, Postsurgical cone beam, Present study, Radial deviation, Radial deviations, Randomized selection, Residual dentition, Rigid template material, Safety zone, Shoulder depth deviation, Single tooth, Single tooth gaps, Slice thickness, Soft tissue, Software, Software program, Stereolithographic, Stereolithographic guide systems, Surgical, Surgical guide, Surgical template, Surgical templates, Surgical transfer, Systematic review, Template, Tomography, Tting position, Virtual implant planning, Virtual planning.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the present prospective clinical study was to evaluate the match between the positions and axes of the virtually planned and the placed implants using laboratory‐based surgical guides generated from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02176.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:AB6B3E7147173791F50597DDE1E60BC20C75E60FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients</title><author><name sortKey="Behneke, Alexandra" sort="Behneke, Alexandra" uniqKey="Behneke A" first="Alexandra" last="Behneke">Alexandra Behneke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Burwinkel, Matthias" sort="Burwinkel, Matthias" uniqKey="Burwinkel M" first="Matthias" last="Burwinkel">Matthias Burwinkel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Knierim, Kristian" sort="Knierim, Kristian" uniqKey="Knierim K" first="Kristian" last="Knierim">Kristian Knierim</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Behneke, Nikolaus" sort="Behneke, Nikolaus" uniqKey="Behneke N" first="Nikolaus" last="Behneke">Nikolaus Behneke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:AB6B3E7147173791F50597DDE1E60BC20C75E60F</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02176.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/AB6B3E7147173791F50597DDE1E60BC20C75E60F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005556</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005556</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients</title><author><name sortKey="Behneke, Alexandra" sort="Behneke, Alexandra" uniqKey="Behneke A" first="Alexandra" last="Behneke">Alexandra Behneke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Burwinkel, Matthias" sort="Burwinkel, Matthias" uniqKey="Burwinkel M" first="Matthias" last="Burwinkel">Matthias Burwinkel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Knierim, Kristian" sort="Knierim, Kristian" uniqKey="Knierim K" first="Kristian" last="Knierim">Kristian Knierim</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Behneke, Nikolaus" sort="Behneke, Nikolaus" uniqKey="Behneke N" first="Nikolaus" last="Behneke">Nikolaus Behneke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="137">137</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="143">143</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-02">2012-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Accuracy assessment</term><term>Accuracy evaluation</term><term>Angular deviation</term><term>Angular deviations</term><term>Apex</term><term>Apex depth deviation</term><term>Apical</term><term>Apical deviations</term><term>Augmentation measures</term><term>Behneke</term><term>Bonferroni test</term><term>Cavity preparation</term><term>Cbct</term><term>Cbct acquisition</term><term>Cbct data</term><term>Cbct images</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical situation</term><term>Cone beam</term><term>Conventional templates</term><term>Dental arch</term><term>Dental laboratory</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Depth deviation</term><term>Deviation</term><term>Different kinds</term><term>Different regions</term><term>Dynamic navigation</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Entry point</term><term>Horizontal deviations</term><term>Horizontal plane</term><term>Image data</term><term>Image fusion technique</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant planning</term><term>Implant planning concept</term><term>Implant position</term><term>Implant positions</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Institut straumann</term><term>International journal</term><term>Interquartile range</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons behneke</term><term>Lego brick</term><term>Linear deviations</term><term>Long axis</term><term>Maximum deviation</term><term>Med3d</term><term>Med3d planning software</term><term>Med3d system</term><term>Median</term><term>Middle axis</term><term>Mucosal punch</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Oral medicine</term><term>Oral pathology</term><term>Oral radiology</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oral surgery</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Percentile</term><term>Percentile range</term><term>Planning data</term><term>Planning stage</term><term>Postsurgical cone beam</term><term>Present study</term><term>Radial deviation</term><term>Radial deviations</term><term>Randomized selection</term><term>Residual dentition</term><term>Rigid template material</term><term>Safety zone</term><term>Shoulder depth deviation</term><term>Single tooth</term><term>Single tooth gaps</term><term>Slice thickness</term><term>Soft tissue</term><term>Software</term><term>Software program</term><term>Stereolithographic</term><term>Stereolithographic guide systems</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical guide</term><term>Surgical template</term><term>Surgical templates</term><term>Surgical transfer</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Template</term><term>Tomography</term><term>Tting position</term><term>Virtual implant planning</term><term>Virtual planning</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Accuracy assessment</term><term>Accuracy evaluation</term><term>Angular deviation</term><term>Angular deviations</term><term>Apex</term><term>Apex depth deviation</term><term>Apical</term><term>Apical deviations</term><term>Augmentation measures</term><term>Behneke</term><term>Bonferroni test</term><term>Cavity preparation</term><term>Cbct</term><term>Cbct acquisition</term><term>Cbct data</term><term>Cbct images</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical situation</term><term>Cone beam</term><term>Conventional templates</term><term>Dental arch</term><term>Dental laboratory</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Depth deviation</term><term>Deviation</term><term>Different kinds</term><term>Different regions</term><term>Dynamic navigation</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Entry point</term><term>Horizontal deviations</term><term>Horizontal plane</term><term>Image data</term><term>Image fusion technique</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant planning</term><term>Implant planning concept</term><term>Implant position</term><term>Implant positions</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Institut straumann</term><term>International journal</term><term>Interquartile range</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons behneke</term><term>Lego brick</term><term>Linear deviations</term><term>Long axis</term><term>Maximum deviation</term><term>Med3d</term><term>Med3d planning software</term><term>Med3d system</term><term>Median</term><term>Middle axis</term><term>Mucosal punch</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Oral medicine</term><term>Oral pathology</term><term>Oral radiology</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oral surgery</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Percentile</term><term>Percentile range</term><term>Planning data</term><term>Planning stage</term><term>Postsurgical cone beam</term><term>Present study</term><term>Radial deviation</term><term>Radial deviations</term><term>Randomized selection</term><term>Residual dentition</term><term>Rigid template material</term><term>Safety zone</term><term>Shoulder depth deviation</term><term>Single tooth</term><term>Single tooth gaps</term><term>Slice thickness</term><term>Soft tissue</term><term>Software</term><term>Software program</term><term>Stereolithographic</term><term>Stereolithographic guide systems</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical guide</term><term>Surgical template</term><term>Surgical templates</term><term>Surgical transfer</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Template</term><term>Tomography</term><term>Tting position</term><term>Virtual implant planning</term><term>Virtual planning</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objectives: The aim of the present prospective clinical study was to evaluate the match between the positions and axes of the virtually planned and the placed implants using laboratory‐based surgical guides generated from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>cbct</json:string><json:string>behneke</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>cone beam</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>dental arch</json:string><json:string>software</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>percentile</json:string><json:string>stereolithographic</json:string><json:string>tomography</json:string><json:string>dentition</json:string><json:string>accuracy assessment</json:string><json:string>med3d</json:string><json:string>median</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>implant shoulder</json:string><json:string>angular deviation</json:string><json:string>apical</json:string><json:string>template</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>implant planning</json:string><json:string>linear deviations</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>residual dentition</json:string><json:string>image data</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>implant positions</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>surgical transfer</json:string><json:string>angular deviations</json:string><json:string>percentile range</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>cbct acquisition</json:string><json:string>partial edentulism</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>image fusion technique</json:string><json:string>oral surgery</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>surgical templates</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons behneke</json:string><json:string>lego brick</json:string><json:string>surgical template</json:string><json:string>maximum deviation</json:string><json:string>shoulder depth deviation</json:string><json:string>depth deviation</json:string><json:string>planning data</json:string><json:string>planning stage</json:string><json:string>radial deviation</json:string><json:string>horizontal deviations</json:string><json:string>deviation</json:string><json:string>apex</json:string><json:string>surgical guide</json:string><json:string>augmentation measures</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>middle axis</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>institut straumann</json:string><json:string>implant position</json:string><json:string>apex depth deviation</json:string><json:string>software program</json:string><json:string>long axis</json:string><json:string>slice thickness</json:string><json:string>apical deviations</json:string><json:string>bonferroni test</json:string><json:string>dental laboratory</json:string><json:string>different kinds</json:string><json:string>different regions</json:string><json:string>implant planning concept</json:string><json:string>stereolithographic guide systems</json:string><json:string>implant insertion</json:string><json:string>clinical situation</json:string><json:string>postsurgical cone beam</json:string><json:string>horizontal plane</json:string><json:string>interquartile range</json:string><json:string>accuracy evaluation</json:string><json:string>single tooth</json:string><json:string>implant surgery</json:string><json:string>cbct images</json:string><json:string>dynamic navigation</json:string><json:string>radial deviations</json:string><json:string>tting position</json:string><json:string>rigid template material</json:string><json:string>safety zone</json:string><json:string>virtual planning</json:string><json:string>conventional templates</json:string><json:string>single tooth gaps</json:string><json:string>med3d system</json:string><json:string>cbct data</json:string><json:string>entry point</json:string><json:string>randomized selection</json:string><json:string>soft tissue</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>med3d planning software</json:string><json:string>cavity preparation</json:string><json:string>oral medicine</json:string><json:string>oral pathology</json:string><json:string>oral radiology</json:string><json:string>virtual implant planning</json:string><json:string>mucosal punch</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Alexandra Behneke</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Matthias Burwinkel</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Kristian Knierim</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Nikolaus Behneke</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>computer‐aided implant planning</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cone‐beam computed tomography</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>surgical template</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2176</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-NPGJLPDG-4</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objectives: The aim of the present prospective clinical study was to evaluate the match between the positions and axes of the virtually planned and the placed implants using laboratory‐based surgical guides generated from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.456</score><pdfWordCount>5157</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32967</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>38</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>259</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients</title><pmid><json:string>21443593</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>137</first><last>143</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>between April 2008 and March 2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Mainz Germany Tel</json:string><json:string>The International Journal</json:string><json:string>A Systems Approach</json:string><json:string>Joint Commission Resources</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Alexandra Behneke</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Sites</json:string><json:string>Authors</json:string><json:string>Van Assche</json:string><json:string>Kristian Knierim</json:string><json:string>J. Morita</json:string><json:string>Matthias Burwinkel</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Heidelberg</json:string><json:string>Hamburg</json:string><json:string>Europe</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Basel</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Ozan et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Brief et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Horwitz et al. (2009)</json:string><json:string>Barnea et al. (2010)</json:string><json:string>Ludlow & Ivanovic 2008</json:string><json:string>Schneider et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Sarment et al. (2003)</json:string><json:string>Behneke et al</json:string><json:string>Horwitz et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>van Assche et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Loubele et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Jung et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Ersoy et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Araujo et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Arisan et al. 2010b</json:string><json:string>Behneke et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>van Assche et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Dreiseidler et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Arisan et al. 2010a</json:string><json:string>Hanold et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Chuang et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>van Assche et al. (2010)</json:string><json:string>Vercruyssen et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Widmann et al. 2010</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-NPGJLPDG-4</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02176.x</json:string></doi><id>AB6B3E7147173791F50597DDE1E60BC20C75E60F</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AB6B3E7147173791F50597DDE1E60BC20C75E60F/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AB6B3E7147173791F50597DDE1E60BC20C75E60F/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/AB6B3E7147173791F50597DDE1E60BC20C75E60F/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients</title><title level="a" type="short">Accuracy assessment of cone beam CT‐derived surgical templates</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Alexandra</forename><surname>Behneke</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Matthias</forename><surname>Burwinkel</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Kristian</forename><surname>Knierim</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Nikolaus</forename><surname>Behneke</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">AB6B3E7147173791F50597DDE1E60BC20C75E60F</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-NPGJLPDG-4</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02176.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2176</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2176.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="137">137</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="143">143</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objectives: </hi> The aim of the present prospective clinical study was to evaluate the match between the positions and axes of the virtually planned and the placed implants using laboratory‐based surgical guides generated from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and methods: </hi> A total of 132 implants were placed with the aid of 3D‐based transfer templates in 52 consecutive partially edentulous patients between April 2008 and March 2010. After individual adaptation of the scan templates and CBCT scanning, the acquired data for virtual implant planning and simulation were processed using the med3D software program. After finalizing the virtual placement of the implants the radiographic templates were converted into operative guides containing titanium sleeves for cavity preparation. Preoperative planning was merged with postoperative CBCT data to identify linear and angular deviations between virtually planned and placed implants.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> Compared with the planned implants the installed implants showed linear deviations in the median at the neck and apex of 0.27 mm (range 0.01–0.97 mm), and of 0.46 mm (range 0.03–1.38 mm), respectively. The angle deviation was 1.84° in median, with a range of 0.07–6.26°. The extent of deviation depends on the size of the tooth gap and the distribution of the remaining teeth.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> The results of this study suggested that laboratory‐fabricated surgical guides using CBCT data may be reliable in implant placement under prosthodontic considerations in partial edentulism.</p><p><hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Knierim K, Behneke N. Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">23</hi>, 2012; 137–143.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02176.x</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">computer‐aided implant planning</term><term xml:id="k2">cone‐beam computed tomography</term><term xml:id="k3">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k4">surgical template</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AB6B3E7147173791F50597DDE1E60BC20C75E60F/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-2</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="23">23</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-02">February 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="1" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02176.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2176"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.9.1 mode:FullText" date="2011-11-15"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2012-01-06" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-03-28"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-03-28"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-01-16"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">137</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">143</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
<i>Priv.‐Doz. Dr. Alexandra Behneke</i>
Zahn‐, Mund‐ und Kieferklinik
Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Chirurgie
Augustusplatz 2
D‐55131 Mainz
Germany
Tel.: +49 6131 173053
Fax: +49 6131 173434
e‐mail: <email normalForm="behneke@oralchir.klinik.uni-mainz.de">behneke@oralchir.klinik.uni‐mainz.de</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2176.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b>, Accepted 16 January 2011</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="8"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="23"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6314"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="30"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients</title><title type="shortAuthors">Behneke et al.</title><title type="short">Accuracy assessment of cone beam CT‐derived surgical templates</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Alexandra</givenNames><familyName>Behneke</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Matthias</givenNames><familyName>Burwinkel</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Kristian</givenNames><familyName>Knierim</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Nikolaus</givenNames><familyName>Behneke</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">computer‐aided implant planning</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">cone‐beam computed tomography</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">surgical template</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objectives: </b> The aim of the present prospective clinical study was to evaluate the match between the positions and axes of the virtually planned and the placed implants using laboratory‐based surgical guides generated from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><b>Materials and methods: </b> A total of 132 implants were placed with the aid of 3D‐based transfer templates in 52 consecutive partially edentulous patients between April 2008 and March 2010. After individual adaptation of the scan templates and CBCT scanning, the acquired data for virtual implant planning and simulation were processed using the med3D software program. After finalizing the virtual placement of the implants the radiographic templates were converted into operative guides containing titanium sleeves for cavity preparation. Preoperative planning was merged with postoperative CBCT data to identify linear and angular deviations between virtually planned and placed implants.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Compared with the planned implants the installed implants showed linear deviations in the median at the neck and apex of 0.27 mm (range 0.01–0.97 mm), and of 0.46 mm (range 0.03–1.38 mm), respectively. The angle deviation was 1.84° in median, with a range of 0.07–6.26°. The extent of deviation depends on the size of the tooth gap and the distribution of the remaining teeth.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> The results of this study suggested that laboratory‐fabricated surgical guides using CBCT data may be reliable in implant placement under prosthodontic considerations in partial edentulism.</p><p><b>To cite this article:</b>
Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Knierim K, Behneke N. Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>23</b>, 2012; 137–143.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02176.x</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Accuracy assessment of cone beam CT‐derived surgical templates</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Alexandra</namePart><namePart type="family">Behneke</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Matthias</namePart><namePart type="family">Burwinkel</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kristian</namePart><namePart type="family">Knierim</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Nikolaus</namePart><namePart type="family">Behneke</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-02</dateIssued><edition>Date:, Accepted 16 January 2011</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">8</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">23</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">30</extent><extent unit="words">6314</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objectives: The aim of the present prospective clinical study was to evaluate the match between the positions and axes of the virtually planned and the placed implants using laboratory‐based surgical guides generated from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).</abstract><abstract>Materials and methods: A total of 132 implants were placed with the aid of 3D‐based transfer templates in 52 consecutive partially edentulous patients between April 2008 and March 2010. After individual adaptation of the scan templates and CBCT scanning, the acquired data for virtual implant planning and simulation were processed using the med3D software program. After finalizing the virtual placement of the implants the radiographic templates were converted into operative guides containing titanium sleeves for cavity preparation. Preoperative planning was merged with postoperative CBCT data to identify linear and angular deviations between virtually planned and placed implants.</abstract><abstract>Results: Compared with the planned implants the installed implants showed linear deviations in the median at the neck and apex of 0.27 mm (range 0.01–0.97 mm), and of 0.46 mm (range 0.03–1.38 mm), respectively. The angle deviation was 1.84° in median, with a range of 0.07–6.26°. The extent of deviation depends on the size of the tooth gap and the distribution of the remaining teeth.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that laboratory‐fabricated surgical guides using CBCT data may be reliable in implant placement under prosthodontic considerations in partial edentulism.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Knierim K, Behneke N. Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 137–143.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02176.x</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>computer‐aided implant planning</topic><topic>cone‐beam computed tomography</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>surgical template</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>137</start><end>143</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">AB6B3E7147173791F50597DDE1E60BC20C75E60F</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-NPGJLPDG-4</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02176.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2176</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AB6B3E7147173791F50597DDE1E60BC20C75E60F/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005556 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005556 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:AB6B3E7147173791F50597DDE1E60BC20C75E60F
|texte= Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography‐derived laboratory‐based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |