The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial
Identifieur interne : 005507 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005506; suivant : 005508The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial
Auteurs : T. Van De Velde ; L. Sennerby ; H. De BruynSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2010-11.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Aesthetics, Apless, Apless approach, Apless implant surgery, Apless procedure, Apless surgery, Baseline, Bone level, Bone loss, Buccal side, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical trial, Control group, Control implants, Control side, Control sides, Conventional protocol, Conventional surgery, Dental implants, Dentistry, Drill template, Early loading, Edentulous, Edentulous maxilla, Fracture, Ghent, Healing abutments, Immediate loading, Immediate occlusal loading, Impl, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant installation, Implant placement, Implant success, Implant surgery, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Loading, Mandible, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone levels, Maxilla, Maxillofacial, Median, Microgap, Modality, Mucosal, Mucosal tissues, Oral hygiene, Oral impl, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofacial implants, Other studies, Periodontology, Pilot study, Posterior maxilla, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Protocol, Provisional bridge, Provisional rehabilitation, Radiographic, Radiographic outcome, Randomized, Rank test, Ranks test range test, Reference point, Restorative dentistry, Sennerby, Soft tissues, Statistical analysis, Steenberghe, Straumann, Suppl, Surgery, Surgical, Tapered implants, Temporary cylinders, Test group, Test implants, Test side, Test sides, Treatment modality, Treatment satisfaction, Velde.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Aesthetics, Apless, Apless approach, Apless implant surgery, Apless procedure, Apless surgery, Baseline, Bone level, Bone loss, Buccal side, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical trial, Control group, Control implants, Control side, Control sides, Conventional protocol, Conventional surgery, Dental implants, Dentistry, Drill template, Early loading, Edentulous, Edentulous maxilla, Fracture, Ghent, Healing abutments, Immediate loading, Immediate occlusal loading, Impl, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant installation, Implant placement, Implant success, Implant surgery, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Loading, Mandible, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone levels, Maxilla, Maxillofacial, Median, Microgap, Modality, Mucosal, Mucosal tissues, Oral hygiene, Oral impl, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofacial implants, Other studies, Periodontology, Pilot study, Posterior maxilla, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Protocol, Provisional bridge, Provisional rehabilitation, Radiographic, Radiographic outcome, Randomized, Rank test, Ranks test range test, Reference point, Restorative dentistry, Sennerby, Soft tissues, Statistical analysis, Steenberghe, Straumann, Suppl, Surgery, Surgical, Tapered implants, Temporary cylinders, Test group, Test implants, Test side, Test sides, Treatment modality, Treatment satisfaction, Velde.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate and compare the outcome of dental implants placed using a flapless protocol and immediate loading with a conventional protocol and loading after 6 weeks.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01924.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:AA721A7B63AFC29E2C15EA73B22F43037DCCC079Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial</title><author><name sortKey="Van De Velde, T" sort="Van De Velde, T" uniqKey="Van De Velde T" first="T." last="Van De Velde">T. Van De Velde</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, L" sort="Sennerby, L" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="L." last="Sennerby">L. Sennerby</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, H" sort="De Bruyn, H" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="H." last="De Bruyn">H. De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:AA721A7B63AFC29E2C15EA73B22F43037DCCC079</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01924.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/AA721A7B63AFC29E2C15EA73B22F43037DCCC079/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005507</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005507</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial</title><author><name sortKey="Van De Velde, T" sort="Van De Velde, T" uniqKey="Van De Velde T" first="T." last="Van De Velde">T. Van De Velde</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, L" sort="Sennerby, L" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="L." last="Sennerby">L. Sennerby</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, H" sort="De Bruyn, H" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="H." last="De Bruyn">H. De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1223">1223</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1233">1233</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-11">2010-11</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Aesthetics</term><term>Apless</term><term>Apless approach</term><term>Apless implant surgery</term><term>Apless procedure</term><term>Apless surgery</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Buccal side</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Control group</term><term>Control implants</term><term>Control side</term><term>Control sides</term><term>Conventional protocol</term><term>Conventional surgery</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Drill template</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous maxilla</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Ghent</term><term>Healing abutments</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immediate occlusal loading</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Loading</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Median</term><term>Microgap</term><term>Modality</term><term>Mucosal</term><term>Mucosal tissues</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Protocol</term><term>Provisional bridge</term><term>Provisional rehabilitation</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic outcome</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Rank test</term><term>Ranks test range test</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Restorative dentistry</term><term>Sennerby</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Straumann</term><term>Suppl</term><term>Surgery</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Tapered implants</term><term>Temporary cylinders</term><term>Test group</term><term>Test implants</term><term>Test side</term><term>Test sides</term><term>Treatment modality</term><term>Treatment satisfaction</term><term>Velde</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Aesthetics</term><term>Apless</term><term>Apless approach</term><term>Apless implant surgery</term><term>Apless procedure</term><term>Apless surgery</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Buccal side</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Control group</term><term>Control implants</term><term>Control side</term><term>Control sides</term><term>Conventional protocol</term><term>Conventional surgery</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Drill template</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous maxilla</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Ghent</term><term>Healing abutments</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immediate occlusal loading</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Loading</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Median</term><term>Microgap</term><term>Modality</term><term>Mucosal</term><term>Mucosal tissues</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Protocol</term><term>Provisional bridge</term><term>Provisional rehabilitation</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic outcome</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Rank test</term><term>Ranks test range test</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Restorative dentistry</term><term>Sennerby</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Straumann</term><term>Suppl</term><term>Surgery</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Tapered implants</term><term>Temporary cylinders</term><term>Test group</term><term>Test implants</term><term>Test side</term><term>Test sides</term><term>Treatment modality</term><term>Treatment satisfaction</term><term>Velde</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objectives: To evaluate and compare the outcome of dental implants placed using a flapless protocol and immediate loading with a conventional protocol and loading after 6 weeks.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>apless</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>velde</json:string><json:string>control implants</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>straumann</json:string><json:string>control sides</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>apless surgery</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>implant surgery</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>posterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>steenberghe</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>test implants</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>temporary cylinders</json:string><json:string>suppl</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>mucosal</json:string><json:string>sennerby</json:string><json:string>randomized</json:string><json:string>apless approach</json:string><json:string>microgap</json:string><json:string>edentulous maxilla</json:string><json:string>reference point</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>surgery</json:string><json:string>soft tissues</json:string><json:string>control side</json:string><json:string>treatment modality</json:string><json:string>radiographic outcome</json:string><json:string>implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>oral implantology</json:string><json:string>conventional protocol</json:string><json:string>buccal side</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>apless procedure</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>test group</json:string><json:string>test side</json:string><json:string>apless implant surgery</json:string><json:string>provisional rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>marginal bone levels</json:string><json:string>mucosal tissues</json:string><json:string>provisional bridge</json:string><json:string>treatment satisfaction</json:string><json:string>aesthetics</json:string><json:string>protocol</json:string><json:string>median</json:string><json:string>modality</json:string><json:string>ghent</json:string><json:string>ranks test range test</json:string><json:string>implant installation</json:string><json:string>other studies</json:string><json:string>tapered implants</json:string><json:string>statistical analysis</json:string><json:string>test sides</json:string><json:string>implant success</json:string><json:string>rank test</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>early loading</json:string><json:string>drill template</json:string><json:string>healing abutments</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>pilot study</json:string><json:string>oral hygiene</json:string><json:string>conventional surgery</json:string><json:string>immediate occlusal loading</json:string><json:string>restorative dentistry</json:string><json:string>loading</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>T. Van de Velde</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>L. Sennerby</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Göteborg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>H. De Bruyn</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone implant interactions</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>clinical research</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>clinical trials</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>CT Imaging</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>patient centered outcomes</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>prosthodontics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>soft tissue‐ implant interactions</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>surgical techniques</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>wound healing</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1924</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-714S3FDW-S</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objectives: To evaluate and compare the outcome of dental implants placed using a flapless protocol and immediate loading with a conventional protocol and loading after 6 weeks.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>27</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>177</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>9</keywordCount><score>7.324</score><pdfWordCount>7860</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>53087</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial</title><pmid><json:string>20626424</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>21</volume><issue>11</issue><pages><first>1223</first><last>1233</last><total>11</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1229</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>European Academy of Periodontology</json:string><json:string>Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Goteborg, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Ghent University</json:string><json:string>University of Ghent</json:string><json:string>National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Georges Van Maele</json:string><json:string>Implant</json:string><json:string>Christian Ruyffelaert</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>H. De Bruyn</json:string><json:string>LA Number</json:string><json:string>Dr Hilde</json:string><json:string>Van de Velde</json:string><json:string>L. Sennerby</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>St. Quentin</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Malmo</json:string><json:string>Jokstad</json:string><json:string>Erlangen</json:string><json:string>Benelux</json:string><json:string>Barcelona</json:string><json:string>Basel</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>France</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Spain</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url><json:string>http://www.clinicaltrials.gov</json:string><json:string>http://www.consort-statement.org</json:string></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Balshi et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Di Giacomo et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Fischer et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Achilli et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Van de Velde et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Glauser et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>BouSerhal et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Blanes et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Shin et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Tardieu et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Hermann et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>McGivney et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson & Isidor 1994</json:string><json:string>Glauser et al. 2005, 2007</json:string><json:string>Aparicio et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Misch et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Broggini et al. 2003, 2006</json:string><json:string>Calandriello & Tomatis 2005</json:string><json:string>Cannizzaro et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Alomrani et al. (2005)</json:string><json:string>Rocci et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Cochran et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Ibanez et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Zollner et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Grunder 2001</json:string><json:string>Ostman et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Astrand et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Tealdo et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Lee & Toothaker 1998</json:string><json:string>Van de Velde et al</json:string><json:string>Yong & Moy 2008</json:string><json:string>Komiyama et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Nikellis et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Bergkvist et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Gallucci et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Van Assche et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Fortin et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Lazzara & Porter 2006</json:string><json:string>Degidi & Piattelli 2005</json:string><json:string>Komiyama et al. (2008)</json:string><json:string>Fortin et al. (2006)</json:string><json:string>van Steenberghe et al. 2002, 2005</json:string><json:string>Becker et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Lindeboom et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Vercruyssen et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Ozkan et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Bergkvist et al. (2008)</json:string><json:string>Sarment et al. 2003</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-714S3FDW-S</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01924.x</json:string></doi><id>AA721A7B63AFC29E2C15EA73B22F43037DCCC079</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AA721A7B63AFC29E2C15EA73B22F43037DCCC079/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AA721A7B63AFC29E2C15EA73B22F43037DCCC079/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/AA721A7B63AFC29E2C15EA73B22F43037DCCC079/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-11"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial</title><title level="a" type="short">The outcome of guided flapless and immediately loaded implant placement</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">T.</forename><surname>Van de Velde</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">L.</forename><surname>Sennerby</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Göteborg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">H.</forename><surname>De Bruyn</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">AA721A7B63AFC29E2C15EA73B22F43037DCCC079</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-714S3FDW-S</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01924.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1924</idno><idno type="supplier">1924</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1924.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-11</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1223">1223</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1233">1233</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-11"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objectives: </hi> To evaluate and compare the outcome of dental implants placed using a flapless protocol and immediate loading with a conventional protocol and loading after 6 weeks.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and methods: </hi> Fourteen patients with bilateral maxillary edentulous areas were treated using Straumann SLA‐implants. Using a randomized split‐mouth design, implants were placed in one side of the maxilla using a stereolithographic surgical guide for flapless surgery and immediately loaded on temporary abutments with a bridge (test). Implants in the other side were placed using the conventional protocol and loaded after 6 weeks of healing (control). Clinical and radiographic evaluation of peri‐implant tissues was performed at time of implant surgery, and after 1 week, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> A total of 70 implants were placed (36 test and 34 control). One implant (test) was lost after 3 months, resulting in a survival rate of 97.3% for the test implants and 100% for the control implants. Marginal bone levels were not statistically significantly different between the test and control implants but at baseline the marginal bone level was significantly lower compared to the other evaluation periods (<hi rend="italic">P</hi> < 0.05). The mean bone level for test and control implants was 1.95 mm ± 0.70 and 1.93 mm ±0.42 after 18 months, respectively. There was a significant change in height of the attached mucosa at implants placed with a conventional flap between post‐operative and 1 week and between 1 week and 6 weeks. Statistically significant differences were found between the test side and the control side for opinion about speech, function, aesthetics, self‐confidence and overall appreciation the first 6 weeks.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> Implants can successfully integrate in the posterior maxilla using a flapless approach with immediate loading similar to a conventional protocol. The mucosal tissues around implants placed with a conventional flap changed significantly compared with flapless placed implants.</p><p>
<hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
Van de Velde T, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">21</hi>, 2010; 1223–1233.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01924.x</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bone implant interactions</term><term xml:id="k2">clinical research</term><term xml:id="k3">clinical trials</term><term xml:id="k4">CT Imaging</term><term xml:id="k5">patient centered outcomes</term><term xml:id="k6">prosthodontics</term><term xml:id="k7">soft tissue‐ implant interactions</term><term xml:id="k8">surgical techniques</term><term xml:id="k9">wound healing</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AA721A7B63AFC29E2C15EA73B22F43037DCCC079/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="11111"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-11</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="21">21</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="11">11</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-11">November 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="4" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01924.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1924"></id><id type="supplier" value="1924"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="11"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-07-07"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-07-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.25 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-11-05"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-07-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1223">1223</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="1233">1233</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
<i>Dr Tommie L. A. Van de Velde</i>
Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology
University of Ghent
De Pintelaan 185
Ghent 9000
Belgium
Tel.: +32 9 240 5922
e‐mail: <email normalForm="tommie.vandevelde@ugent.be">tommie.vandevelde@ugent.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1924.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 25 December 2009</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="5"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="9"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="50"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="11280"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="51"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial</title><title type="shortAuthors">Van de Velde et al.</title><title type="short">The outcome of guided flapless and immediately loaded implant placement</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>T.</givenNames><familyName>Van de Velde</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>L.</givenNames><familyName>Sennerby</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>H.</givenNames><familyName>De Bruyn</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Göteborg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bone implant interactions</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">clinical research</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">clinical trials</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">CT Imaging</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">patient centered outcomes</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">prosthodontics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">soft tissue‐ implant interactions</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">surgical techniques</keyword><keyword xml:id="k9">wound healing</keyword></keywordGroup><supportingInformation><p><b>Table S1.</b> Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials.</p><p>Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.</p><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:09057161:media:clr1924:CLR_1924_sm_suppinfo"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting info item</caption></supportingInfoItem></supportingInformation><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objectives: </b> To evaluate and compare the outcome of dental implants placed using a flapless protocol and immediate loading with a conventional protocol and loading after 6 weeks.</p><p><b>Materials and methods: </b> Fourteen patients with bilateral maxillary edentulous areas were treated using Straumann SLA‐implants. Using a randomized split‐mouth design, implants were placed in one side of the maxilla using a stereolithographic surgical guide for flapless surgery and immediately loaded on temporary abutments with a bridge (test). Implants in the other side were placed using the conventional protocol and loaded after 6 weeks of healing (control). Clinical and radiographic evaluation of peri‐implant tissues was performed at time of implant surgery, and after 1 week, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months.</p><p><b>Results: </b> A total of 70 implants were placed (36 test and 34 control). One implant (test) was lost after 3 months, resulting in a survival rate of 97.3% for the test implants and 100% for the control implants. Marginal bone levels were not statistically significantly different between the test and control implants but at baseline the marginal bone level was significantly lower compared to the other evaluation periods (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The mean bone level for test and control implants was 1.95 mm ± 0.70 and 1.93 mm ±0.42 after 18 months, respectively. There was a significant change in height of the attached mucosa at implants placed with a conventional flap between post‐operative and 1 week and between 1 week and 6 weeks. Statistically significant differences were found between the test side and the control side for opinion about speech, function, aesthetics, self‐confidence and overall appreciation the first 6 weeks.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> Implants can successfully integrate in the posterior maxilla using a flapless approach with immediate loading similar to a conventional protocol. The mucosal tissues around implants placed with a conventional flap changed significantly compared with flapless placed implants.</p><p> <b>To cite this article:</b>
Van de Velde T, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>21</b>, 2010; 1223–1233.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01924.x</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>The outcome of guided flapless and immediately loaded implant placement</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">T.</namePart><namePart type="family">Van de Velde</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">L.</namePart><namePart type="family">Sennerby</namePart><affiliation>Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Göteborg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">H.</namePart><namePart type="family">De Bruyn</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-11</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 25 December 2009</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">5</extent><extent unit="tables">9</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">50</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">51</extent><extent unit="words">11280</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objectives: To evaluate and compare the outcome of dental implants placed using a flapless protocol and immediate loading with a conventional protocol and loading after 6 weeks.</abstract><abstract>Materials and methods: Fourteen patients with bilateral maxillary edentulous areas were treated using Straumann SLA‐implants. Using a randomized split‐mouth design, implants were placed in one side of the maxilla using a stereolithographic surgical guide for flapless surgery and immediately loaded on temporary abutments with a bridge (test). Implants in the other side were placed using the conventional protocol and loaded after 6 weeks of healing (control). Clinical and radiographic evaluation of peri‐implant tissues was performed at time of implant surgery, and after 1 week, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months.</abstract><abstract>Results: A total of 70 implants were placed (36 test and 34 control). One implant (test) was lost after 3 months, resulting in a survival rate of 97.3% for the test implants and 100% for the control implants. Marginal bone levels were not statistically significantly different between the test and control implants but at baseline the marginal bone level was significantly lower compared to the other evaluation periods (P < 0.05). The mean bone level for test and control implants was 1.95 mm ± 0.70 and 1.93 mm ±0.42 after 18 months, respectively. There was a significant change in height of the attached mucosa at implants placed with a conventional flap between post‐operative and 1 week and between 1 week and 6 weeks. Statistically significant differences were found between the test side and the control side for opinion about speech, function, aesthetics, self‐confidence and overall appreciation the first 6 weeks.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: Implants can successfully integrate in the posterior maxilla using a flapless approach with immediate loading similar to a conventional protocol. The mucosal tissues around implants placed with a conventional flap changed significantly compared with flapless placed implants.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Van de Velde T, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 1223–1233.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01924.x</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone implant interactions</topic><topic>clinical research</topic><topic>clinical trials</topic><topic>CT Imaging</topic><topic>patient centered outcomes</topic><topic>prosthodontics</topic><topic>soft tissue‐ implant interactions</topic><topic>surgical techniques</topic><topic>wound healing</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><note type="content"> Table S1. Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Table S1. Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.Supporting Info Item: Supporting info item - </note><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>21</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>11</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1223</start><end>1233</end><total>11</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">AA721A7B63AFC29E2C15EA73B22F43037DCCC079</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-714S3FDW-S</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01924.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1924</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AA721A7B63AFC29E2C15EA73B22F43037DCCC079/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005507 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005507 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:AA721A7B63AFC29E2C15EA73B22F43037DCCC079
|texte= The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: a randomized clinical trial
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |