Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants
Identifieur interne : 005379 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005378; suivant : 005380Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants
Auteurs : Joe Merheb ; Marc Quirynen ; Wim TeughelsSource :
- Periodontology 2000 [ 0906-6713 ] ; 2014-10.
Abstract
The buccal bone plate is a component of the alveolar process tightly related to the tooth it supports. A plethora of physiological and pathological events can induce its remodeling. Understanding this remodeling process and its extent is of major importance for the practitioner as it can affect the functional and esthetic outcome of implant surgery at the involved sites. Bone remodeling and resorption of the buccal bone plate are inevitable after tooth loss or extraction. To limit resorption, several ridge‐preservation techniques of varying efficacy have been described. Bone resorption is equally found to occur upon implant placement and is thought to be a result of the surgical trauma inflicted as well as an adaptation process of the tissues to the new foreign body. Because of the implications of bone resorption on the soft‐tissue levels and the general esthetic outcome, it is of primary importance for the practitioner to be able to evaluate the hard tissues and the inherent resorption risks in an effort to optimize the treatment strategies. Based on limited short‐term data, the present general opinion advises the need for a 2‐mm‐thick buccal bone plate in order to avoid vertical bone resorption.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/prd.12042
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A76B7D4D5F11F4094D43C975AAAF1CB316C58877Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants</title><author><name sortKey="Merheb, Joe" sort="Merheb, Joe" uniqKey="Merheb J" first="Joe" last="Merheb">Joe Merheb</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Teughels, Wim" sort="Teughels, Wim" uniqKey="Teughels W" first="Wim" last="Teughels">Wim Teughels</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A76B7D4D5F11F4094D43C975AAAF1CB316C58877</idno><date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/prd.12042</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A76B7D4D5F11F4094D43C975AAAF1CB316C58877/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005379</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005379</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants</title><author><name sortKey="Merheb, Joe" sort="Merheb, Joe" uniqKey="Merheb J" first="Joe" last="Merheb">Joe Merheb</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Teughels, Wim" sort="Teughels, Wim" uniqKey="Teughels W" first="Wim" last="Teughels">Wim Teughels</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Periodontology 2000</title><title level="j" type="alt">PERIODONTOLOGY 2000</title><idno type="ISSN">0906-6713</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0757</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">66</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="97">97</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="105">105</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-10">2014-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0906-6713</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0906-6713</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The buccal bone plate is a component of the alveolar process tightly related to the tooth it supports. A plethora of physiological and pathological events can induce its remodeling. Understanding this remodeling process and its extent is of major importance for the practitioner as it can affect the functional and esthetic outcome of implant surgery at the involved sites. Bone remodeling and resorption of the buccal bone plate are inevitable after tooth loss or extraction. To limit resorption, several ridge‐preservation techniques of varying efficacy have been described. Bone resorption is equally found to occur upon implant placement and is thought to be a result of the surgical trauma inflicted as well as an adaptation process of the tissues to the new foreign body. Because of the implications of bone resorption on the soft‐tissue levels and the general esthetic outcome, it is of primary importance for the practitioner to be able to evaluate the hard tissues and the inherent resorption risks in an effort to optimize the treatment strategies. Based on limited short‐term data, the present general opinion advises the need for a 2‐mm‐thick buccal bone plate in order to avoid vertical bone resorption.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Joe Merheb</name></json:item><json:item><name>Marc Quirynen</name></json:item><json:item><name>Wim Teughels</name></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>PRD12042</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-WGRK5NDB-C</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The buccal bone plate is a component of the alveolar process tightly related to the tooth it supports. A plethora of physiological and pathological events can induce its remodeling. Understanding this remodeling process and its extent is of major importance for the practitioner as it can affect the functional and esthetic outcome of implant surgery at the involved sites. Bone remodeling and resorption of the buccal bone plate are inevitable after tooth loss or extraction. To limit resorption, several ridge‐preservation techniques of varying efficacy have been described. Bone resorption is equally found to occur upon implant placement and is thought to be a result of the surgical trauma inflicted as well as an adaptation process of the tissues to the new foreign body. Because of the implications of bone resorption on the soft‐tissue levels and the general esthetic outcome, it is of primary importance for the practitioner to be able to evaluate the hard tissues and the inherent resorption risks in an effort to optimize the treatment strategies. Based on limited short‐term data, the present general opinion advises the need for a 2‐mm‐thick buccal bone plate in order to avoid vertical bone resorption.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.316</score><pdfWordCount>5794</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>35163</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>193</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1216</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Periodontology 2000</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0757</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0906-6713</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0757</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>PRD</json:string></publisherId><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>97</first><last>105</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-WGRK5NDB-C</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2014</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2014</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/prd.12042</json:string></doi><id>A76B7D4D5F11F4094D43C975AAAF1CB316C58877</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A76B7D4D5F11F4094D43C975AAAF1CB316C58877/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A76B7D4D5F11F4094D43C975AAAF1CB316C58877/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A76B7D4D5F11F4094D43C975AAAF1CB316C58877/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2014-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Joe</forename><surname>Merheb</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Marc</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Wim</forename><surname>Teughels</surname></persName></author><idno type="istex">A76B7D4D5F11F4094D43C975AAAF1CB316C58877</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-WGRK5NDB-C</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/prd.12042</idno><idno type="unit">PRD12042</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:PRD.PRD12042.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Periodontology 2000</title><title level="j" type="alt">PERIODONTOLOGY 2000</title><idno type="pISSN">0906-6713</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0757</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0757</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/prd.2014.66.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">PRD</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">66</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="97">97</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="105">105</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="prd12042-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head><p>The buccal bone plate is a component of the alveolar process tightly related to the tooth it supports. A plethora of physiological and pathological events can induce its remodeling. Understanding this remodeling process and its extent is of major importance for the practitioner as it can affect the functional and esthetic outcome of implant surgery at the involved sites. Bone remodeling and resorption of the buccal bone plate are inevitable after tooth loss or extraction. To limit resorption, several ridge‐preservation techniques of varying efficacy have been described. Bone resorption is equally found to occur upon implant placement and is thought to be a result of the surgical trauma inflicted as well as an adaptation process of the tissues to the new foreign body. Because of the implications of bone resorption on the soft‐tissue levels and the general esthetic outcome, it is of primary importance for the practitioner to be able to evaluate the hard tissues and the inherent resorption risks in an effort to optimize the treatment strategies. Based on limited short‐term data, the present general opinion advises the need for a 2‐mm‐thick buccal bone plate in order to avoid vertical bone resorption.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="prd12042" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0757</doi><issn type="print">0906-6713</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0757</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="PRD"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="PERIODONTOLOGY 2000" type="main">Periodontology 2000</title><title type="short">Periodontol 2000</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/prd.2014.66.issue-1</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="66" type="journalVolume">66</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2014-10">October 2014</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="60" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/prd.12042</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="PRD12042"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="9" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2013-06-12" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-10-06" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.3.3 mode:FullText" date="2014-08-14"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2014-08-14"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2014-08-14"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-07"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">97</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">105</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:PRD.PRD12042.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants</title><title type="shortAuthors">Merheb et al.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="prd12042-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Joe</givenNames> <familyName>Merheb</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="prd12042-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Marc</givenNames> <familyName>Quirynen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="prd12042-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Wim</givenNames> <familyName>Teughels</familyName></personName></creator></creators><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="prd12042-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>The buccal bone plate is a component of the alveolar process tightly related to the tooth it supports. A plethora of physiological and pathological events can induce its remodeling. Understanding this remodeling process and its extent is of major importance for the practitioner as it can affect the functional and esthetic outcome of implant surgery at the involved sites. Bone remodeling and resorption of the buccal bone plate are inevitable after tooth loss or extraction. To limit resorption, several ridge‐preservation techniques of varying efficacy have been described. Bone resorption is equally found to occur upon implant placement and is thought to be a result of the surgical trauma inflicted as well as an adaptation process of the tissues to the new foreign body. Because of the implications of bone resorption on the soft‐tissue levels and the general esthetic outcome, it is of primary importance for the practitioner to be able to evaluate the hard tissues and the inherent resorption risks in an effort to optimize the treatment strategies. Based on limited short‐term data, the present general opinion advises the need for a 2‐mm‐thick buccal bone plate in order to avoid vertical bone resorption.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Joe</namePart><namePart type="family">Merheb</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marc</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Wim</namePart><namePart type="family">Teughels</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2014-10</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-10-06</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2013-06-12</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>The buccal bone plate is a component of the alveolar process tightly related to the tooth it supports. A plethora of physiological and pathological events can induce its remodeling. Understanding this remodeling process and its extent is of major importance for the practitioner as it can affect the functional and esthetic outcome of implant surgery at the involved sites. Bone remodeling and resorption of the buccal bone plate are inevitable after tooth loss or extraction. To limit resorption, several ridge‐preservation techniques of varying efficacy have been described. Bone resorption is equally found to occur upon implant placement and is thought to be a result of the surgical trauma inflicted as well as an adaptation process of the tissues to the new foreign body. Because of the implications of bone resorption on the soft‐tissue levels and the general esthetic outcome, it is of primary importance for the practitioner to be able to evaluate the hard tissues and the inherent resorption risks in an effort to optimize the treatment strategies. Based on limited short‐term data, the present general opinion advises the need for a 2‐mm‐thick buccal bone plate in order to avoid vertical bone resorption.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Periodontology 2000</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Periodontol 2000</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0906-6713</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0757</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0757</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">PRD</identifier><part><date>2014</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>66</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>97</start><end>105</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A76B7D4D5F11F4094D43C975AAAF1CB316C58877</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-WGRK5NDB-C</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/prd.12042</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">PRD12042</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A76B7D4D5F11F4094D43C975AAAF1CB316C58877/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005379 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005379 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A76B7D4D5F11F4094D43C975AAAF1CB316C58877
|texte= Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |