Basic surgical principles with ITI implants
Identifieur interne : 005369 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005368; suivant : 005370Basic surgical principles with ITI implants
Auteurs : Daniel Buser ; Thomas Von Arx ; Christiaan Ten Bruggenkate ; Dieter WeingartSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2000-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Anterior maxilla, Appropriate implant type, Behneke, Biomedical materials research, Buser, Case reports, Clinical experience, Contraindication, Crest width, Dental implant system, Dental implants, Dentistry, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Esthetic sites, Healing period, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant placement, Implant sites, Implant surgeon, Implant system, Implant therapy, Implants research, International journal, Local contraindications, Local risk factors, Mandible, Mandibular canal, Maxilla, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial surgery, Miniature pigs, Molar sites, Oral rehabilitation, Oral surgery, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegration, Posterior areas, Prospective study, Recipient site, Risk factor, Risk factors, Screw implants, Standard screw implant, Standard sites, Success rates, Surgery, Surgical, Surgical procedure, Tissue integration, Titanium, Titanium implants.
- Teeft :
- Anterior maxilla, Appropriate implant type, Behneke, Biomedical materials research, Buser, Case reports, Clinical experience, Contraindication, Crest width, Dental implant system, Dental implants, Dentistry, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Esthetic sites, Healing period, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant placement, Implant sites, Implant surgeon, Implant system, Implant therapy, Implants research, International journal, Local contraindications, Local risk factors, Mandible, Mandibular canal, Maxilla, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial surgery, Miniature pigs, Molar sites, Oral rehabilitation, Oral surgery, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegration, Posterior areas, Prospective study, Recipient site, Risk factor, Risk factors, Screw implants, Standard screw implant, Standard sites, Success rates, Surgery, Surgical, Surgical procedure, Tissue integration, Titanium, Titanium implants.
Abstract
The basic surgical principles governing the placement of ITI implants are based on research‐oriented developments in harmony with evidence‐based and outcome‐oriented clinical procedures. In the past 15 years, the range of implant indications has been significantly widened, and partially edentulous patients clearly represent the majority of patients seeking treatment with dental implants today. An important aspect of the successful rehabilitation of patients with ITI implants is the careful selection of implant candidates with respect to systemic and local risk factors. These factors are presented based on current knowledge. Today, solid‐screw implants in various screw dimensions and neck configurations comprise the ITI Dental Implant System. These different implant types are necessary to handle the full range of implant indications, in particular in partially edentulous patients. The main clinical factors are presented for the selection of the appropriate implant type, length and diameter. These implants are utilized both in a non‐submerged and in a submerged approach. The main goal of surgical therapy is low trauma and the least demanding surgical procedure for patient and clinician to optimize the cost‐effectiveness of implant therapy. Hence, a non‐submerged approach is preferred in all sites without esthetic priority, such as in fully edentulous patients or in posterior sites of partially edentulous patients. These indications clearly represent the majority of implant patients. In esthetic sites, a submerged approach is utilized to satisfy the specific esthetic demands. The possibility to successfully utilize short implants (6 and 8 mm) and a reduced healing period of 3 months are further advantages of ITI implants due to favorable properties of the rough TPS surface. With the introduction of the microrough SLA surface, a reduction of the healing period to 6 weeks facilitates further progress towards simplification of implant therapy. In summary, the ITI Dental Implant System represents a scientifically well‐documented, complete implant system for the treatment of fully and partially edentulous patients, offering straightforward surgical concepts based on predictable treatment outcome and excellent cost‐effectiveness.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1059.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A73CF7031D456A17648F63E1D45112F8CB1E6A59Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Basic surgical principles with ITI implants</title><author><name sortKey="Buser, Daniel" sort="Buser, Daniel" uniqKey="Buser D" first="Daniel" last="Buser">Daniel Buser</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept. of Oral Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Von Arx, Thomas" sort="Von Arx, Thomas" uniqKey="Von Arx T" first="Thomas" last="Von Arx">Thomas Von Arx</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept. of Oral Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ten Bruggenkate, Christiaan" sort="Ten Bruggenkate, Christiaan" uniqKey="Ten Bruggenkate C" first="Christiaan" last="Ten Bruggenkate">Christiaan Ten Bruggenkate</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weingart, Dieter" sort="Weingart, Dieter" uniqKey="Weingart D" first="Dieter" last="Weingart">Dieter Weingart</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept. of Maxillofacial Surgery, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A73CF7031D456A17648F63E1D45112F8CB1E6A59</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1059.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A73CF7031D456A17648F63E1D45112F8CB1E6A59/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005369</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005369</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Basic surgical principles with ITI implants<ref type="note" target="#fn1"><hi rend="superscript">Note</hi></ref></title><author><name sortKey="Buser, Daniel" sort="Buser, Daniel" uniqKey="Buser D" first="Daniel" last="Buser">Daniel Buser</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept. of Oral Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Von Arx, Thomas" sort="Von Arx, Thomas" uniqKey="Von Arx T" first="Thomas" last="Von Arx">Thomas Von Arx</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept. of Oral Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ten Bruggenkate, Christiaan" sort="Ten Bruggenkate, Christiaan" uniqKey="Ten Bruggenkate C" first="Christiaan" last="Ten Bruggenkate">Christiaan Ten Bruggenkate</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weingart, Dieter" sort="Weingart, Dieter" uniqKey="Weingart D" first="Dieter" last="Weingart">Dieter Weingart</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dept. of Maxillofacial Surgery, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="59">59</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="68">68</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-09">2000-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anterior maxilla</term><term>Appropriate implant type</term><term>Behneke</term><term>Biomedical materials research</term><term>Buser</term><term>Case reports</term><term>Clinical experience</term><term>Contraindication</term><term>Crest width</term><term>Dental implant system</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Esthetic sites</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant surgeon</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>Local contraindications</term><term>Local risk factors</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular canal</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Miniature pigs</term><term>Molar sites</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oral surgery</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Posterior areas</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Recipient site</term><term>Risk factor</term><term>Risk factors</term><term>Screw implants</term><term>Standard screw implant</term><term>Standard sites</term><term>Success rates</term><term>Surgery</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Tissue integration</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Anterior maxilla</term><term>Appropriate implant type</term><term>Behneke</term><term>Biomedical materials research</term><term>Buser</term><term>Case reports</term><term>Clinical experience</term><term>Contraindication</term><term>Crest width</term><term>Dental implant system</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Esthetic sites</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant surgeon</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>Local contraindications</term><term>Local risk factors</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular canal</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Miniature pigs</term><term>Molar sites</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oral surgery</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Posterior areas</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Recipient site</term><term>Risk factor</term><term>Risk factors</term><term>Screw implants</term><term>Standard screw implant</term><term>Standard sites</term><term>Success rates</term><term>Surgery</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Tissue integration</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The basic surgical principles governing the placement of ITI implants are based on research‐oriented developments in harmony with evidence‐based and outcome‐oriented clinical procedures. In the past 15 years, the range of implant indications has been significantly widened, and partially edentulous patients clearly represent the majority of patients seeking treatment with dental implants today. An important aspect of the successful rehabilitation of patients with ITI implants is the careful selection of implant candidates with respect to systemic and local risk factors. These factors are presented based on current knowledge. Today, solid‐screw implants in various screw dimensions and neck configurations comprise the ITI Dental Implant System. These different implant types are necessary to handle the full range of implant indications, in particular in partially edentulous patients. The main clinical factors are presented for the selection of the appropriate implant type, length and diameter. These implants are utilized both in a non‐submerged and in a submerged approach. The main goal of surgical therapy is low trauma and the least demanding surgical procedure for patient and clinician to optimize the cost‐effectiveness of implant therapy. Hence, a non‐submerged approach is preferred in all sites without esthetic priority, such as in fully edentulous patients or in posterior sites of partially edentulous patients. These indications clearly represent the majority of implant patients. In esthetic sites, a submerged approach is utilized to satisfy the specific esthetic demands. The possibility to successfully utilize short implants (6 and 8 mm) and a reduced healing period of 3 months are further advantages of ITI implants due to favorable properties of the rough TPS surface. With the introduction of the microrough SLA surface, a reduction of the healing period to 6 weeks facilitates further progress towards simplification of implant therapy. In summary, the ITI Dental Implant System represents a scientifically well‐documented, complete implant system for the treatment of fully and partially edentulous patients, offering straightforward surgical concepts based on predictable treatment outcome and excellent cost‐effectiveness.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>buser</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>contraindication</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>behneke</json:string><json:string>implant therapy</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>healing period</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>recipient site</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>oral surgery</json:string><json:string>risk factors</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>surgical procedure</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>implant system</json:string><json:string>success rates</json:string><json:string>molar sites</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>clinical experience</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandible</json:string><json:string>standard screw implant</json:string><json:string>biomedical materials research</json:string><json:string>screw implants</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>appropriate implant type</json:string><json:string>implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>crest width</json:string><json:string>local contraindications</json:string><json:string>risk factor</json:string><json:string>case reports</json:string><json:string>mandibular canal</json:string><json:string>standard sites</json:string><json:string>implant sites</json:string><json:string>tissue integration</json:string><json:string>anterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>implant surgeon</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>local risk factors</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>dental implant system</json:string><json:string>esthetic sites</json:string><json:string>miniature pigs</json:string><json:string>posterior areas</json:string><json:string>surgery</json:string><json:string>daniel buser</json:string><json:string>implant indications</json:string><json:string>high risk factors</json:string><json:string>possible indications</json:string><json:string>screw implant</json:string><json:string>additional implant</json:string><json:string>wound healing capacity</json:string><json:string>micro titanium mesh</json:string><json:string>bone height</json:string><json:string>implant insertion</json:string><json:string>infectious diseases</json:string><json:string>healthy bone</json:string><json:string>typical indication</json:string><json:string>careful selection</json:string><json:string>core diameter</json:string><json:string>surgical procedures</json:string><json:string>temporary contraindications</json:string><json:string>distinct difference</json:string><json:string>machined surface</json:string><json:string>temporary contraindication</json:string><json:string>implant surface</json:string><json:string>implant stability</json:string><json:string>ultimate goal</json:string><json:string>dental implant</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string><json:string>antibiotic prophylaxis</json:string><json:string>healthy patients</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>endosseous implants</json:string><json:string>functional loading</json:string><json:string>successful rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>local complications</json:string><json:string>clinical studies</json:string><json:string>esthetic priority</json:string><json:string>various implant types</json:string><json:string>european journal</json:string><json:string>implant types</json:string><json:string>favorable properties</json:string><json:string>clinical dentistry</json:string><json:string>quintessence publishing</json:string><json:string>longitudinal study</json:string><json:string>posterior sites</json:string><json:string>life table analysis</json:string><json:string>special indications</json:string><json:string>dental research</json:string><json:string>histometric study</json:string><json:string>clinical trials</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>nonsubmerged titanium implants</json:string><json:string>community dentistry</json:string><json:string>oral epidemiology</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>restorative dentistry</json:string><json:string>implant diameter</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Daniel Buser</name><affiliations><json:string>Dept. of Oral Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Thomas Von Arx</name><affiliations><json:string>Dept. of Oral Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Christiaan Ten Bruggenkate</name><affiliations><json:string>Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Dieter Weingart</name><affiliations><json:string>Dept. of Maxillofacial Surgery, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cost‐effectiveness</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>ITI implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>non‐submerged approach</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>risk factors</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>short implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>SLA surface</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>submerged approach</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>surgical procedures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>TPS surface</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLRCLRVOL11S106</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-ZNDV0TCD-8</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The basic surgical principles governing the placement of ITI implants are based on research‐oriented developments in harmony with evidence‐based and outcome‐oriented clinical procedures. In the past 15 years, the range of implant indications has been significantly widened, and partially edentulous patients clearly represent the majority of patients seeking treatment with dental implants today. An important aspect of the successful rehabilitation of patients with ITI implants is the careful selection of implant candidates with respect to systemic and local risk factors. These factors are presented based on current knowledge. Today, solid‐screw implants in various screw dimensions and neck configurations comprise the ITI Dental Implant System. These different implant types are necessary to handle the full range of implant indications, in particular in partially edentulous patients. The main clinical factors are presented for the selection of the appropriate implant type, length and diameter. These implants are utilized both in a non‐submerged and in a submerged approach. The main goal of surgical therapy is low trauma and the least demanding surgical procedure for patient and clinician to optimize the cost‐effectiveness of implant therapy. Hence, a non‐submerged approach is preferred in all sites without esthetic priority, such as in fully edentulous patients or in posterior sites of partially edentulous patients. These indications clearly represent the majority of implant patients. In esthetic sites, a submerged approach is utilized to satisfy the specific esthetic demands. The possibility to successfully utilize short implants (6 and 8 mm) and a reduced healing period of 3 months are further advantages of ITI implants due to favorable properties of the rough TPS surface. With the introduction of the microrough SLA surface, a reduction of the healing period to 6 weeks facilitates further progress towards simplification of implant therapy. In summary, the ITI Dental Implant System represents a scientifically well‐documented, complete implant system for the treatment of fully and partially edentulous patients, offering straightforward surgical concepts based on predictable treatment outcome and excellent cost‐effectiveness.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>10</score><pdfWordCount>5426</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>35463</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 794 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>323</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>2260</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>9</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Basic surgical principles with ITI implants</title><pmid><json:string>11168257</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>11</volume><pages><first>59</first><last>68</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1990s</json:string><json:string>1986</json:string><json:string>1998</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Switzerland, Gerhard Wahl, Germany, Dieter Weingart, Germany</json:string><json:string>Committee Members</json:string><json:string>Switzerland, Daniel Buser, Switzerland, Karl Dula, Switzerland, Christian Foitzik, Germany, Michael Gahlert, Germany, Solve</json:string><json:string>Netherlands, Thomas</json:string><json:string>Sweden, Hans Peter Hirt, Switzerland, Hideaki Katsuyama, Japan, Barbara Lehmann, Switzerland, Herbert Niederdellmann, Germany, Stephen Rimer, USA, Marcel Scacchi, Switzerland, Wilfried Schilli, Germany, Christiaan</json:string><json:string>Switzerland Tel</json:string><json:string>Elisabeth Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Freiburgstrasse</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Alexandra Behneke</json:string><json:string>Daniel Buser</json:string><json:string>Drug</json:string><json:string>Leon A. Assael</json:string><json:string>Thomas von Arx</json:string><json:string>Jay Beagle</json:string><json:string>Please</json:string><json:string>A.V. van Gool</json:string><json:string>Dieter Weingart</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Bern</json:string><json:string>Stuttgart</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Oikarinen et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Ledermann 1996</json:string><json:string>Navazesh et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Bain 1996</json:string><json:string>Mordenfeld et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Weber et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Bernard et al. 1995b</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Cochran et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Cronin et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Perel 1994</json:string><json:string>Bain & Moy 1993</json:string><json:string>von Arx et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Haas et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Epstein et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>MericskeStern et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Bernard et al. 1995a</json:string><json:string>Ellies 1992</json:string><json:string>Wehrbein et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Blanchaert 1998</json:string><json:string>Dietrich et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Esser & Wagner 1997</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1999b</json:string><json:string>Brånemark et al. 1985</json:string><json:string>Behneke et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Wilke et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Jisander et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Behneke et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Shernoff et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Bergendal et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Ericsson et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1999a</json:string><json:string>Wong et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Baxter & Fattore 1993</json:string><json:string>Buser et al.</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1991b</json:string><json:string>Granstrom & Tjellstrom 1997</json:string><json:string>Mombelli 1993</json:string><json:string>Ivanoff et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Thilander et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Scharf & Tarnow 1993</json:string><json:string>Weyant 1994</json:string><json:string>Mombelli & Lang 1992</json:string><json:string>Hogenius et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Lindquist et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1991a</json:string><json:string>Gouvoussis et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Fritz 1997</json:string><json:string>Cune & de Putter 1996</json:string><json:string>Weinberg et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Gotfredsen et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Babbush et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>Ericsson et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Dao et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Gorman et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Salama et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Worthington 1995</json:string><json:string>Wong et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Cochran et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Meffert 1993</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Wu & Ship 1993</json:string><json:string>Rangert et al. 1995</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-ZNDV0TCD-8</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1059.x</json:string></doi><id>A73CF7031D456A17648F63E1D45112F8CB1E6A59</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A73CF7031D456A17648F63E1D45112F8CB1E6A59/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A73CF7031D456A17648F63E1D45112F8CB1E6A59/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A73CF7031D456A17648F63E1D45112F8CB1E6A59/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Basic surgical principles with ITI implants<ref type="note" target="#fn1"><hi rend="superscript">Note</hi></ref></title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-09"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Basic surgical principles with ITI implants<ref type="note" target="#fn1"><hi rend="superscript">Note</hi></ref></title><title level="a" type="short">Basic surgical principles with ITI implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Daniel</forename><surname>Buser</surname></persName><affiliation>Dept. of Oral Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Thomas</forename><surname>Arx</surname></persName><affiliation>Dept. of Oral Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Christiaan</forename><surname>Bruggenkate</surname></persName><affiliation>Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Dieter</forename><surname>Weingart</surname></persName><affiliation>Dept. of Maxillofacial Surgery, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">A73CF7031D456A17648F63E1D45112F8CB1E6A59</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-ZNDV0TCD-8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1059.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLRCLRVOL11S106</idno><idno type="supplier">clr1-03</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLRclrvol11s106.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2000.11.issue-s1</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="59">59</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="68">68</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-09"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="italic">ITI Dental Implant System</hi><:t>The basic surgical principles governing the placement of ITI implants are based on research‐oriented developments in harmony with evidence‐based and outcome‐oriented clinical procedures. In the past 15 years, the range of implant indications has been significantly widened, and partially edentulous patients clearly represent the majority of patients seeking treatment with dental implants today. An important aspect of the successful rehabilitation of patients with ITI implants is the careful selection of implant candidates with respect to systemic and local risk factors. These factors are presented based on current knowledge. Today, solid‐screw implants in various screw dimensions and neck configurations comprise the ITI Dental Implant System. These different implant types are necessary to handle the full range of implant indications, in particular in partially edentulous patients. The main clinical factors are presented for the selection of the appropriate implant type, length and diameter. These implants are utilized both in a non‐submerged and in a submerged approach. The main goal of surgical therapy is low trauma and the least demanding surgical procedure for patient and clinician to optimize the cost‐effectiveness of implant therapy. Hence, a non‐submerged approach is preferred in all sites without esthetic priority, such as in fully edentulous patients or in posterior sites of partially edentulous patients. These indications clearly represent the majority of implant patients. In esthetic sites, a submerged approach is utilized to satisfy the specific esthetic demands. The possibility to successfully utilize short implants (6 and 8 mm) and a reduced healing period of 3 months are further advantages of ITI implants due to favorable properties of the rough TPS surface. With the introduction of the microrough SLA surface, a reduction of the healing period to 6 weeks facilitates further progress towards simplification of implant therapy. In summary, the</:t><:t>represents a scientifically well‐documented, complete implant system for the treatment of fully and partially edentulous patients, offering straightforward surgical concepts based on predictable treatment outcome and excellent cost‐effectiveness.</:t></p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">cost‐effectiveness</term><term xml:id="k2">ITI implants</term><term xml:id="k3">non‐submerged approach</term><term xml:id="k4">risk factors</term><term xml:id="k5">short implants</term><term xml:id="k6">SLA surface</term><term xml:id="k7">submerged approach</term><term xml:id="k8">surgical procedures</term><term xml:id="k9">TPS surface</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Article</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change>undefined</change><change>[object Object]</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A73CF7031D456A17648F63E1D45112F8CB1E6A59/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title type="subtitle">Chapter 3</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09000"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2000.11.issue-s1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="11">11</numbering><numbering type="supplement">s1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2000-09">September 2000</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0005900" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1059.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLRCLRVOL11S106"></id><id type="supplier" value="clr1-03"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Article</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-01-04"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2009-03-31"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="59">59</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="68">68</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Prof. Dr. Daniel Buser, Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH‐3010 Berne, Switzerland
Tel.: +41 31 632 25 55
Fax: +41 31 632 98 84
e‐mail:
<email>daniel.buser@zmk.unibe.ch</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLRclrvol11s106.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="0"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6786"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Basic surgical principles with ITI implants <link href="#fn1"><sup>Note</sup></link></title><title type="shortAuthors">Buser et al.</title><title type="short">Basic surgical principles with ITI implants</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Daniel</givenNames><familyName>Buser</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Thomas</givenNames><familyNamePrefix>Von</familyNamePrefix><familyName>
Arx
</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Christiaan</givenNames><familyNamePrefix>Ten</familyNamePrefix><familyName>
Bruggenkate
</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Dieter</givenNames><familyName>Weingart</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>Dept. of Oral Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation>Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Dept. of Maxillofacial Surgery, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">cost‐effectiveness</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">ITI implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">non‐submerged approach</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">risk factors</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">short implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">SLA surface</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">submerged approach</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">surgical procedures</keyword><keyword xml:id="k9">TPS surface</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The basic surgical principles governing the placement of ITI implants are based on research‐oriented developments in harmony with evidence‐based and outcome‐oriented clinical procedures. In the past 15 years, the range of implant indications has been significantly widened, and partially edentulous patients clearly represent the majority of patients seeking treatment with dental implants today. An important aspect of the successful rehabilitation of patients with ITI implants is the careful selection of implant candidates with respect to systemic and local risk factors. These factors are presented based on current knowledge. Today, solid‐screw implants in various screw dimensions and neck configurations comprise the ITI Dental Implant System. These different implant types are necessary to handle the full range of implant indications, in particular in partially edentulous patients. The main clinical factors are presented for the selection of the appropriate implant type, length and diameter. These implants are utilized both in a non‐submerged and in a submerged approach. The main goal of surgical therapy is low trauma and the least demanding surgical procedure for patient and clinician to optimize the cost‐effectiveness of implant therapy. Hence, a non‐submerged approach is preferred in all sites without esthetic priority, such as in fully edentulous patients or in posterior sites of partially edentulous patients. These indications clearly represent the majority of implant patients. In esthetic sites, a submerged approach is utilized to satisfy the specific esthetic demands. The possibility to successfully utilize short implants (6 and 8 mm) and a reduced healing period of 3 months are further advantages of ITI implants due to favorable properties of the rough TPS surface. With the introduction of the microrough SLA surface, a reduction of the healing period to 6 weeks facilitates further progress towards simplification of implant therapy. In summary, the <i>ITI Dental Implant System</i> represents a scientifically well‐documented, complete implant system for the treatment of fully and partially edentulous patients, offering straightforward surgical concepts based on predictable treatment outcome and excellent cost‐effectiveness.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1" numbered="no"><p> <b>Committee Members</b>:</p><p>Leon A. Assael, USA, Jay Beagle, USA, Alexandra Behneke, Germany, Jean‐Pierre Bernard, Switzerland, Daniel Buser, Switzerland, Karl Dula, Switzerland, Christian Foitzik, Germany, Michael Gahlert, Germany, Sölve Hellem, Sweden, Hans Peter Hirt, Switzerland, Hideaki Katsuyama, Japan, Barbara Lehmann, Switzerland, Herbert Niederdellmann, Germany, Stephen Rimer, USA, Marcel Scacchi, Switzerland, Wilfried Schilli, Germany, Christiaan ten Bruggenkate, The Netherlands, A.V. van Gool, The Netherlands, Thomas von Arx, Switzerland, Gerhard Wahl, Germany, Dieter Weingart, Germany</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Basic surgical principles with ITI implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Basic surgical principles with ITI implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Basic surgical principles with ITI implants Note</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniel</namePart><namePart type="family">Buser</namePart><affiliation>Dept. of Oral Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Thomas</namePart><namePart type="family">Von Arx</namePart><affiliation>Dept. of Oral Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Christiaan</namePart><namePart type="family">Ten Bruggenkate</namePart><affiliation>Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Dieter</namePart><namePart type="family">Weingart</namePart><affiliation>Dept. of Maxillofacial Surgery, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-09</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">0</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">0</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">6786</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The basic surgical principles governing the placement of ITI implants are based on research‐oriented developments in harmony with evidence‐based and outcome‐oriented clinical procedures. In the past 15 years, the range of implant indications has been significantly widened, and partially edentulous patients clearly represent the majority of patients seeking treatment with dental implants today. An important aspect of the successful rehabilitation of patients with ITI implants is the careful selection of implant candidates with respect to systemic and local risk factors. These factors are presented based on current knowledge. Today, solid‐screw implants in various screw dimensions and neck configurations comprise the ITI Dental Implant System. These different implant types are necessary to handle the full range of implant indications, in particular in partially edentulous patients. The main clinical factors are presented for the selection of the appropriate implant type, length and diameter. These implants are utilized both in a non‐submerged and in a submerged approach. The main goal of surgical therapy is low trauma and the least demanding surgical procedure for patient and clinician to optimize the cost‐effectiveness of implant therapy. Hence, a non‐submerged approach is preferred in all sites without esthetic priority, such as in fully edentulous patients or in posterior sites of partially edentulous patients. These indications clearly represent the majority of implant patients. In esthetic sites, a submerged approach is utilized to satisfy the specific esthetic demands. The possibility to successfully utilize short implants (6 and 8 mm) and a reduced healing period of 3 months are further advantages of ITI implants due to favorable properties of the rough TPS surface. With the introduction of the microrough SLA surface, a reduction of the healing period to 6 weeks facilitates further progress towards simplification of implant therapy. In summary, the ITI Dental Implant System represents a scientifically well‐documented, complete implant system for the treatment of fully and partially edentulous patients, offering straightforward surgical concepts based on predictable treatment outcome and excellent cost‐effectiveness.</abstract><note type="content">*Committee Members: Leon A. Assael, USA, Jay Beagle, USA, Alexandra Behneke, Germany, Jean‐Pierre Bernard, Switzerland, Daniel Buser, Switzerland, Karl Dula, Switzerland, Christian Foitzik, Germany, Michael Gahlert, Germany, Sölve Hellem, Sweden, Hans Peter Hirt, Switzerland, Hideaki Katsuyama, Japan, Barbara Lehmann, Switzerland, Herbert Niederdellmann, Germany, Stephen Rimer, USA, Marcel Scacchi, Switzerland, Wilfried Schilli, Germany, Christiaan ten Bruggenkate, The Netherlands, A.V. van Gool, The Netherlands, Thomas von Arx, Switzerland, Gerhard Wahl, Germany, Dieter Weingart, Germany</note><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>cost‐effectiveness</topic><topic>ITI implants</topic><topic>non‐submerged approach</topic><topic>risk factors</topic><topic>short implants</topic><topic>SLA surface</topic><topic>submerged approach</topic><topic>surgical procedures</topic><topic>TPS surface</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><subTitle>Chapter 3</subTitle></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>11</number></detail><detail type="supplement"><caption>Suppl. no.</caption><number>s1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>59</start><end>68</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A73CF7031D456A17648F63E1D45112F8CB1E6A59</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-ZNDV0TCD-8</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1059.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLRCLRVOL11S106</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A73CF7031D456A17648F63E1D45112F8CB1E6A59/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005369 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005369 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A73CF7031D456A17648F63E1D45112F8CB1E6A59
|texte= Basic surgical principles with ITI implants
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |