Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws
Identifieur interne : 005359 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005358; suivant : 005360Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws
Auteurs : T. JemtSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1993-12.
Abstract
Patients with resorbed edentulous upper jaws were arranged into 2 different groups, based on an overall assessment of bone resorption prior to implant surgery. Each group comprised 3.5 patients, all of whom received an overdenture after abutment connection. The patients in the group with the best bone situation were scheduled to receive a fixed prosthesis after 1 year provided that the clinical situation was stable. The overall cumulative implant and prosthesis treatment success rates were 77% and 85%, respectively, for a 3‐year follow‐up period. Nineteen of the patients in the best bone group received a fixed prosthesis after they had used the overdenture for 1 year. These patients exhibited a cumulative implant success rate of 97%. None of the fixed prostheses was lost. Implant failures and other clinical adjustments were frequent for the first year of follow‐up, but the number of problems diminished in the subsequent years.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040404.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A6D5D6648962245F89CCE27A7103F5C18A523BC1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws</title><author><name sortKey="Jemt, T" sort="Jemt, T" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="T." last="Jemt">T. Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health and University of Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A6D5D6648962245F89CCE27A7103F5C18A523BC1</idno><date when="1993" year="1993">1993</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040404.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A6D5D6648962245F89CCE27A7103F5C18A523BC1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005359</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005359</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws</title><author><name sortKey="Jemt, T" sort="Jemt, T" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="T." last="Jemt">T. Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health and University of Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="187">187</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="194">194</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1993-12">1993-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Patients with resorbed edentulous upper jaws were arranged into 2 different groups, based on an overall assessment of bone resorption prior to implant surgery. Each group comprised 3.5 patients, all of whom received an overdenture after abutment connection. The patients in the group with the best bone situation were scheduled to receive a fixed prosthesis after 1 year provided that the clinical situation was stable. The overall cumulative implant and prosthesis treatment success rates were 77% and 85%, respectively, for a 3‐year follow‐up period. Nineteen of the patients in the best bone group received a fixed prosthesis after they had used the overdenture for 1 year. These patients exhibited a cumulative implant success rate of 97%. None of the fixed prostheses was lost. Implant failures and other clinical adjustments were frequent for the first year of follow‐up, but the number of problems diminished in the subsequent years.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>T. Jemt</name><affiliations><json:string>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health and University of Göteborg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>resorption</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>overdenture</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR040404</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-JVH2TVFT-3</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Patients with resorbed edentulous upper jaws were arranged into 2 different groups, based on an overall assessment of bone resorption prior to implant surgery. Each group comprised 3.5 patients, all of whom received an overdenture after abutment connection. The patients in the group with the best bone situation were scheduled to receive a fixed prosthesis after 1 year provided that the clinical situation was stable. The overall cumulative implant and prosthesis treatment success rates were 77% and 85%, respectively, for a 3‐year follow‐up period. Nineteen of the patients in the best bone group received a fixed prosthesis after they had used the overdenture for 1 year. These patients exhibited a cumulative implant success rate of 97%. None of the fixed prostheses was lost. Implant failures and other clinical adjustments were frequent for the first year of follow‐up, but the number of problems diminished in the subsequent years.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>3.814</score><pdfWordCount>0</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>0</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>563 x 784 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>147</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>940</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>187</first><last>194</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1993</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-JVH2TVFT-3</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1993</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040404.x</json:string></doi><id>A6D5D6648962245F89CCE27A7103F5C18A523BC1</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A6D5D6648962245F89CCE27A7103F5C18A523BC1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>ocr</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/ocr</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A6D5D6648962245F89CCE27A7103F5C18A523BC1/fulltext/ocr</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A6D5D6648962245F89CCE27A7103F5C18A523BC1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A6D5D6648962245F89CCE27A7103F5C18A523BC1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1993-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws</title><title level="a" type="short">Implants treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">T.</forename><surname>Jemt</surname></persName><affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health and University of Göteborg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">A6D5D6648962245F89CCE27A7103F5C18A523BC1</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-JVH2TVFT-3</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040404.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR040404</idno><idno type="supplier"></idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR040404.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.1993.4.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="187">187</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="194">194</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1993-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>Patients with resorbed edentulous upper jaws were arranged into 2 different groups, based on an overall assessment of bone resorption prior to implant surgery. Each group comprised 3.5 patients, all of whom received an overdenture after abutment connection. The patients in the group with the best bone situation were scheduled to receive a fixed prosthesis after 1 year provided that the clinical situation was stable. The overall cumulative implant and prosthesis treatment success rates were 77% and 85%, respectively, for a 3‐year follow‐up period. Nineteen of the patients in the best bone group received a fixed prosthesis after they had used the overdenture for 1 year. These patients exhibited a cumulative implant success rate of 97%. None of the fixed prostheses was lost. Implant failures and other clinical adjustments were frequent for the first year of follow‐up, but the number of problems diminished in the subsequent years.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implants</term><term xml:id="k2">resorption</term><term xml:id="k3">overdenture</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change>undefined</change><change>[object Object]</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A6D5D6648962245F89CCE27A7103F5C18A523BC1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.1993.4.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="4">4</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1993-12">December 1993</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0018700" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040404.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR040404"></id><id type="supplier" value=""></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-06-27"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-06-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="187">187</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="194">194</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Torsten Jemt, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health and University of GBteborg, Medicinaregatan 12C, S‐413 90 Göteborg, Sweden</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR040404.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 14 June 1993</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws</title><title type="shortAuthors">Jemt</title><title type="short">Implants treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>T.</givenNames><familyName>Jemt</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health and University of Göteborg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">resorption</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">overdenture</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Patients with resorbed edentulous upper jaws were arranged into 2 different groups, based on an overall assessment of bone resorption prior to implant surgery. Each group comprised 3.5 patients, all of whom received an overdenture after abutment connection. The patients in the group with the best bone situation were scheduled to receive a fixed prosthesis after 1 year provided that the clinical situation was stable. The overall cumulative implant and prosthesis treatment success rates were 77% and 85%, respectively, for a 3‐year follow‐up period. Nineteen of the patients in the best bone group received a fixed prosthesis after they had used the overdenture for 1 year. These patients exhibited a cumulative implant success rate of 97%. None of the fixed prostheses was lost. Implant failures and other clinical adjustments were frequent for the first year of follow‐up, but the number of problems diminished in the subsequent years.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Implants treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">T.</namePart><namePart type="family">Jemt</namePart><affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health and University of Göteborg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1993-12</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 14 June 1993</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1993</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Patients with resorbed edentulous upper jaws were arranged into 2 different groups, based on an overall assessment of bone resorption prior to implant surgery. Each group comprised 3.5 patients, all of whom received an overdenture after abutment connection. The patients in the group with the best bone situation were scheduled to receive a fixed prosthesis after 1 year provided that the clinical situation was stable. The overall cumulative implant and prosthesis treatment success rates were 77% and 85%, respectively, for a 3‐year follow‐up period. Nineteen of the patients in the best bone group received a fixed prosthesis after they had used the overdenture for 1 year. These patients exhibited a cumulative implant success rate of 97%. None of the fixed prostheses was lost. Implant failures and other clinical adjustments were frequent for the first year of follow‐up, but the number of problems diminished in the subsequent years.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implants</topic><topic>resorption</topic><topic>overdenture</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>1993</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>4</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>187</start><end>194</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A6D5D6648962245F89CCE27A7103F5C18A523BC1</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-JVH2TVFT-3</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040404.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR040404</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A6D5D6648962245F89CCE27A7103F5C18A523BC1/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005359 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005359 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A6D5D6648962245F89CCE27A7103F5C18A523BC1
|texte= Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |