The effect of loading on peri‐implant bone: a critical review of the literature
Identifieur interne : 005320 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005319; suivant : 005321The effect of loading on peri‐implant bone: a critical review of the literature
Auteurs : J. Duyck ; K. VandammeSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2014-10.
Abstract
In the 90s, there was a general belief that mechanical overloading was one of the main reasons for late implant failure. This triggered research to assess the role of mechanical loading on the establishment and the maintenance of oral implant osseointegration. Animal experimental studies indeed suggested the potential detrimental effect of excessive mechanical load on peri‐implant bone, although randomised or controlled clinical trials of treatment interventions of oral implants designed to study overload are lacking. The lack of quantification of so‐called overload at the implant level in the intra‐oral setting is one of the main shortcomings in the literature. The level of evidence of the studies on bone response to implant loading is weak and does not indicate that overload can lead to peri‐implant bone loss, except in case of inflammation. Clinical and animal experimental studies on early and immediate implant loading, however, provide information on the impact of mechanical loading on the process of osseointegration. It is obvious that micromotion between the implant and host tissues compromises osseointegration. However, in case of an efficient force transfer between implant and surrounding tissues, mechanical loading might even stimulate peri‐implant bone formation and therefore osseointegration.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12195
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A60FAE0B959656E9C305676EC60556882AD4E654Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The effect of loading on peri‐implant bone: a critical review of the literature</title><author><name sortKey="Duyck, J" sort="Duyck, J" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="J." last="Duyck">J. Duyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: joke.duyck@uzleuven.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vandamme, K" sort="Vandamme, K" uniqKey="Vandamme K" first="K." last="Vandamme">K. Vandamme</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A60FAE0B959656E9C305676EC60556882AD4E654</idno><date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/joor.12195</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A60FAE0B959656E9C305676EC60556882AD4E654/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005320</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005320</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The effect of loading on peri‐implant bone: a critical review of the literature</title><author><name sortKey="Duyck, J" sort="Duyck, J" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="J." last="Duyck">J. Duyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: joke.duyck@uzleuven.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vandamme, K" sort="Vandamme, K" uniqKey="Vandamme K" first="K." last="Vandamme">K. Vandamme</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">41</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="783">783</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="794">794</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-10">2014-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">In the 90s, there was a general belief that mechanical overloading was one of the main reasons for late implant failure. This triggered research to assess the role of mechanical loading on the establishment and the maintenance of oral implant osseointegration. Animal experimental studies indeed suggested the potential detrimental effect of excessive mechanical load on peri‐implant bone, although randomised or controlled clinical trials of treatment interventions of oral implants designed to study overload are lacking. The lack of quantification of so‐called overload at the implant level in the intra‐oral setting is one of the main shortcomings in the literature. The level of evidence of the studies on bone response to implant loading is weak and does not indicate that overload can lead to peri‐implant bone loss, except in case of inflammation. Clinical and animal experimental studies on early and immediate implant loading, however, provide information on the impact of mechanical loading on the process of osseointegration. It is obvious that micromotion between the implant and host tissues compromises osseointegration. However, in case of an efficient force transfer between implant and surrounding tissues, mechanical loading might even stimulate peri‐implant bone formation and therefore osseointegration.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>J. Duyck</name><affiliations><json:string>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string><json:string>E-mail: joke.duyck@uzleuven.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>K. Vandamme</name><affiliations><json:string>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>loading</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>histology</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>clinical</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>animal</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOOR12195</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-LMSXND7J-K</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>reviewArticle</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>In the 90s, there was a general belief that mechanical overloading was one of the main reasons for late implant failure. This triggered research to assess the role of mechanical loading on the establishment and the maintenance of oral implant osseointegration. Animal experimental studies indeed suggested the potential detrimental effect of excessive mechanical load on peri‐implant bone, although randomised or controlled clinical trials of treatment interventions of oral implants designed to study overload are lacking. The lack of quantification of so‐called overload at the implant level in the intra‐oral setting is one of the main shortcomings in the literature. The level of evidence of the studies on bone response to implant loading is weak and does not indicate that overload can lead to peri‐implant bone loss, except in case of inflammation. Clinical and animal experimental studies on early and immediate implant loading, however, provide information on the impact of mechanical loading on the process of osseointegration. It is obvious that micromotion between the implant and host tissues compromises osseointegration. However, in case of an efficient force transfer between implant and surrounding tissues, mechanical loading might even stimulate peri‐implant bone formation and therefore osseointegration.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>193</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1324</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount><score>9.316</score><pdfWordCount>7477</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>47953</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>The effect of loading on peri‐implant bone: a critical review of the literature</title><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>41</volume><issue>10</issue><pages><first>783</first><last>794</last><total>12</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Review</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-LMSXND7J-K</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2014</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2014</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/joor.12195</json:string></doi><id>A60FAE0B959656E9C305676EC60556882AD4E654</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A60FAE0B959656E9C305676EC60556882AD4E654/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A60FAE0B959656E9C305676EC60556882AD4E654/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A60FAE0B959656E9C305676EC60556882AD4E654/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The effect of loading on peri‐implant bone: a critical review of the literature</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2014-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="review-article" source="reviewArticle" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="review-article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The effect of loading on peri‐implant bone: a critical review of the literature</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">J.</forename><surname>Duyck</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>BIOMAT Research Group</orgName><orgName>Department of Oral Health Sciences</orgName><orgName>KU Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence: Joke Duyck, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, U.Z. St. Raphaël, Kapucijnenvoer 7, B‐3000 Leuven, Belgium. E‐mail: joke.duyck@uzleuven.be</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">K.</forename><surname>Vandamme</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>BIOMAT Research Group</orgName><orgName>Department of Oral Health Sciences</orgName><orgName>KU Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">A60FAE0B959656E9C305676EC60556882AD4E654</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-LMSXND7J-K</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/joor.12195</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR12195</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR12195.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/joor.2014.41.issue-10</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">41</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="783">783</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="794">794</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="joor12195-abs-0001"><head>Summary</head><p>In the 90s, there was a general belief that mechanical overloading was one of the main reasons for late implant failure. This triggered research to assess the role of mechanical loading on the establishment and the maintenance of oral implant osseointegration. Animal experimental studies indeed suggested the potential detrimental effect of excessive mechanical load on peri‐implant bone, although randomised or controlled clinical trials of treatment interventions of oral implants designed to study overload are lacking. The lack of quantification of so‐called overload at the implant level in the intra‐oral setting is one of the main shortcomings in the literature. The level of evidence of the studies on bone response to implant loading is weak and does not indicate that overload can lead to peri‐implant bone loss, except in case of inflammation. Clinical and animal experimental studies on early and immediate implant loading, however, provide information on the impact of mechanical loading on the process of osseointegration. It is obvious that micromotion between the implant and host tissues compromises osseointegration. However, in case of an efficient force transfer between implant and surrounding tissues, mechanical loading might even stimulate peri‐implant bone formation and therefore osseointegration.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="joor12195-kwd-0001">implant</term><term xml:id="joor12195-kwd-0002">bone</term><term xml:id="joor12195-kwd-0003">loading</term><term xml:id="joor12195-kwd-0004">histology</term><term xml:id="joor12195-kwd-0005">clinical</term><term xml:id="joor12195-kwd-0006">animal</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Review</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Review</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="joor12195" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title type="short">J Oral Rehabil</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="100"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/joor.2014.41.issue-10</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="41">41</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">10</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2014-10">October 2014</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="90" status="forIssue" type="reviewArticle"><doi>10.1111/joor.12195</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR12195"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="12" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Review</title><title type="tocHeading1">Review</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2014-05-11" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2014-05-20" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2014-06-03"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2014-06-03"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2014-09-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-07"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">783</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">794</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Correspondence: Joke Duyck, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, U.Z. St. Raphaël, Kapucijnenvoer 7, B‐3000 Leuven, Belgium. E‐mail: <email>joke.duyck@uzleuven.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR12195.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">The effect of loading on peri‐implant bone: a critical review of the literature</title><title type="shortAuthors">J. Duyck & K. Vandamme</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#joor12195-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12195-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>J.</givenNames> <familyName>Duyck</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#joor12195-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12195-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>K.</givenNames> <familyName>Vandamme</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="BE" type="organization" xml:id="joor12195-aff-0001"><orgDiv>BIOMAT Research Group</orgDiv> <orgDiv>Department of Oral Health Sciences</orgDiv> <orgName>KU Leuven</orgName> <address><city>Leuven</city> <country>Belgium</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="joor12195-kwd-0001">implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12195-kwd-0002">bone</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12195-kwd-0003">loading</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12195-kwd-0004">histology</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12195-kwd-0005">clinical</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12195-kwd-0006">animal</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="joor12195-abs-0001"><title type="main">Summary</title><p>In the 90s, there was a general belief that mechanical overloading was one of the main reasons for late implant failure. This triggered research to assess the role of mechanical loading on the establishment and the maintenance of oral implant osseointegration. Animal experimental studies indeed suggested the potential detrimental effect of excessive mechanical load on peri‐implant bone, although randomised or controlled clinical trials of treatment interventions of oral implants designed to study overload are lacking. The lack of quantification of so‐called overload at the implant level in the intra‐oral setting is one of the main shortcomings in the literature. The level of evidence of the studies on bone response to implant loading is weak and does not indicate that overload can lead to peri‐implant bone loss, except in case of inflammation. Clinical and animal experimental studies on early and immediate implant loading, however, provide information on the impact of mechanical loading on the process of osseointegration. It is obvious that micromotion between the implant and host tissues compromises osseointegration. However, in case of an efficient force transfer between implant and surrounding tissues, mechanical loading might even stimulate peri‐implant bone formation and therefore osseointegration.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The effect of loading on peri‐implant bone: a critical review of the literature</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The effect of loading on peri‐implant bone: a critical review of the literature</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Duyck</namePart><affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: joke.duyck@uzleuven.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">K.</namePart><namePart type="family">Vandamme</namePart><affiliation>BIOMAT Research Group, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="reviewArticle" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2014-10</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2014-05-20</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2014-05-11</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>In the 90s, there was a general belief that mechanical overloading was one of the main reasons for late implant failure. This triggered research to assess the role of mechanical loading on the establishment and the maintenance of oral implant osseointegration. Animal experimental studies indeed suggested the potential detrimental effect of excessive mechanical load on peri‐implant bone, although randomised or controlled clinical trials of treatment interventions of oral implants designed to study overload are lacking. The lack of quantification of so‐called overload at the implant level in the intra‐oral setting is one of the main shortcomings in the literature. The level of evidence of the studies on bone response to implant loading is weak and does not indicate that overload can lead to peri‐implant bone loss, except in case of inflammation. Clinical and animal experimental studies on early and immediate implant loading, however, provide information on the impact of mechanical loading on the process of osseointegration. It is obvious that micromotion between the implant and host tissues compromises osseointegration. However, in case of an efficient force transfer between implant and surrounding tissues, mechanical loading might even stimulate peri‐implant bone formation and therefore osseointegration.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implant</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>loading</topic><topic>histology</topic><topic>clinical</topic><topic>animal</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>J Oral Rehabil</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Review</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>2014</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>41</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>10</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>783</start><end>794</end><total>12</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A60FAE0B959656E9C305676EC60556882AD4E654</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-LMSXND7J-K</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/joor.12195</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR12195</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A60FAE0B959656E9C305676EC60556882AD4E654/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005320 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005320 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A60FAE0B959656E9C305676EC60556882AD4E654
|texte= The effect of loading on peri‐implant bone: a critical review of the literature
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |