Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

The Effect on School Budgets of Different Non‐statemented Special Educational Needs Indicators within a Common Funding Formula

Identifieur interne : 005300 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005299; suivant : 005301

The Effect on School Budgets of Different Non‐statemented Special Educational Needs Indicators within a Common Funding Formula

Auteurs : Alan J. Marsh

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:A5A9ECF7217474D64D94FC1E25771BE0C473E377

English descriptors

Abstract

The 1993 Education Act introduced a Common Funding Formula (CFF) for grant‐maintained schools. The Department for Education (DFE) proposes to use free school meals entitlement (FSME) as a proxy indicator to allocate money for non‐statemented special educational needs (NSSEN). This paper concentrates on the issue of NSSEN formula funding within the secondary sector. It examines the relative merits of using different proxy indicators and more direct measures of NSSEN. It also investigates the implications and impact on secondary school budgets of moving to a CFF which uses FSME as its NSSEN indicator, and contrasts that with a local education authority's (LEA) actual formula. FSME is shown to be sa poor predictor, at an individual pupil level, of later educational attainment. These proposed changes in funding arrangement will cause significant and arbitrary gains and losses in school budgets which are not related to the numbers of pupils with special educational needs as assessed by more direct measures.

Url:
DOI: 10.1080/0141192950210108

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:A5A9ECF7217474D64D94FC1E25771BE0C473E377

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">The Effect on School Budgets of Different Non‐statemented Special Educational Needs Indicators within a Common Funding Formula</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Marsh, Alan J" sort="Marsh, Alan J" uniqKey="Marsh A" first="Alan J." last="Marsh">Alan J. Marsh</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>The Open University, Milton, Keynes</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Centre for Educational Policy and Management, School of Education, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A5A9ECF7217474D64D94FC1E25771BE0C473E377</idno>
<date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1080/0141192950210108</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A5A9ECF7217474D64D94FC1E25771BE0C473E377/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005300</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005300</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">The Effect on School Budgets of Different Non‐statemented Special Educational Needs Indicators within a Common Funding Formula</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Marsh, Alan J" sort="Marsh, Alan J" uniqKey="Marsh A" first="Alan J." last="Marsh">Alan J. Marsh</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>The Open University, Milton, Keynes</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Centre for Educational Policy and Management, School of Education, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">British Educational Research Journal</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0141-1926</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1469-3518</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="99">99</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="105">105</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1995-02">1995-02</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0141-1926</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0141-1926</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Actual budget</term>
<term>Actual formula</term>
<term>Actual nssen budget</term>
<term>Additional resources</term>
<term>Aggregate score</term>
<term>Audit commission</term>
<term>Average budget variance</term>
<term>Average percentage variance</term>
<term>Bera dialogues</term>
<term>Budget differences</term>
<term>Budget modelling</term>
<term>Cognitive abilities</term>
<term>Cognitive abilities test</term>
<term>Common funding formula</term>
<term>Commons education committee</term>
<term>Consultation document</term>
<term>Correlation analysis</term>
<term>Different proxy indicators</term>
<term>Different ways</term>
<term>Direct measures need</term>
<term>Disadvantage</term>
<term>Educational achievement</term>
<term>Educational performance</term>
<term>Educational priority areas</term>
<term>Emotional behavioural difficulties</term>
<term>Entitlement</term>
<term>Examination results</term>
<term>Extra resources</term>
<term>Family credit</term>
<term>Formula funding</term>
<term>Free school meal numbers</term>
<term>Free school meals</term>
<term>Free school meals entitlement</term>
<term>Fsme</term>
<term>Fsme budget</term>
<term>Fsme data</term>
<term>Fsmu</term>
<term>Fsmu budget</term>
<term>Fsmu fsme</term>
<term>Funding</term>
<term>Funding formula</term>
<term>Gcse</term>
<term>Gcse results</term>
<term>High correlations</term>
<term>Important principle</term>
<term>Indicator</term>
<term>Indicator readings</term>
<term>Individual pupil level</term>
<term>Individual pupils</term>
<term>Lea</term>
<term>Local management</term>
<term>Local schools information</term>
<term>Marsh table</term>
<term>Maximum gain</term>
<term>Milton keynes</term>
<term>Modelling</term>
<term>Multilingual matters</term>
<term>National curriculum assessments</term>
<term>Ncas</term>
<term>Necessary provision</term>
<term>Nssen</term>
<term>Nssen allocation</term>
<term>Nssen budget</term>
<term>Nssen budget differences</term>
<term>Nssen budgets</term>
<term>Nssen formula</term>
<term>Nssen index</term>
<term>Nssen indicator</term>
<term>Nssen resources</term>
<term>Open university</term>
<term>Other indicators</term>
<term>Oxford review</term>
<term>Para</term>
<term>Plowden report</term>
<term>Policy thrust</term>
<term>Positive discrimination</term>
<term>Primary schools</term>
<term>Primary sector</term>
<term>Proxy indicator</term>
<term>Pupil</term>
<term>Pupil base</term>
<term>Pupil base increases</term>
<term>Pupil level</term>
<term>Pupil level data</term>
<term>Pupil sample</term>
<term>Relative merits</term>
<term>Resource paradox</term>
<term>Sample schools</term>
<term>School budgets</term>
<term>School level</term>
<term>School level data</term>
<term>School sample</term>
<term>School size</term>
<term>Secondary formula</term>
<term>Secondary school</term>
<term>Secondary school budgets</term>
<term>Secondary schools</term>
<term>Secondary sector</term>
<term>Show nssen budget differences</term>
<term>Social disadvantage</term>
<term>Social disadvantage factor</term>
<term>Social disadvantage indicator</term>
<term>Social disadvantage indicators</term>
<term>Social indicators</term>
<term>Social security</term>
<term>Special education</term>
<term>Standard deviation</term>
<term>Standard deviations</term>
<term>Standard spending assessments</term>
<term>Standardised tests</term>
<term>Table viii</term>
<term>Test results</term>
<term>Total subject score</term>
<term>Variance</term>
<term>Various nssen indicators</term>
<term>Warnock report</term>
<term>Welfare benefits</term>
<term>Whole cohort</term>
<term>Year period</term>
<term>Years fsme</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Actual budget</term>
<term>Actual formula</term>
<term>Actual nssen budget</term>
<term>Additional resources</term>
<term>Aggregate score</term>
<term>Audit commission</term>
<term>Average budget variance</term>
<term>Average percentage variance</term>
<term>Bera dialogues</term>
<term>Budget differences</term>
<term>Budget modelling</term>
<term>Cognitive abilities</term>
<term>Cognitive abilities test</term>
<term>Common funding formula</term>
<term>Commons education committee</term>
<term>Consultation document</term>
<term>Correlation analysis</term>
<term>Different proxy indicators</term>
<term>Different ways</term>
<term>Direct measures need</term>
<term>Disadvantage</term>
<term>Educational achievement</term>
<term>Educational performance</term>
<term>Educational priority areas</term>
<term>Emotional behavioural difficulties</term>
<term>Entitlement</term>
<term>Examination results</term>
<term>Extra resources</term>
<term>Family credit</term>
<term>Formula funding</term>
<term>Free school meal numbers</term>
<term>Free school meals</term>
<term>Free school meals entitlement</term>
<term>Fsme</term>
<term>Fsme budget</term>
<term>Fsme data</term>
<term>Fsmu</term>
<term>Fsmu budget</term>
<term>Fsmu fsme</term>
<term>Funding</term>
<term>Funding formula</term>
<term>Gcse</term>
<term>Gcse results</term>
<term>High correlations</term>
<term>Important principle</term>
<term>Indicator</term>
<term>Indicator readings</term>
<term>Individual pupil level</term>
<term>Individual pupils</term>
<term>Lea</term>
<term>Local management</term>
<term>Local schools information</term>
<term>Marsh table</term>
<term>Maximum gain</term>
<term>Milton keynes</term>
<term>Modelling</term>
<term>Multilingual matters</term>
<term>National curriculum assessments</term>
<term>Ncas</term>
<term>Necessary provision</term>
<term>Nssen</term>
<term>Nssen allocation</term>
<term>Nssen budget</term>
<term>Nssen budget differences</term>
<term>Nssen budgets</term>
<term>Nssen formula</term>
<term>Nssen index</term>
<term>Nssen indicator</term>
<term>Nssen resources</term>
<term>Open university</term>
<term>Other indicators</term>
<term>Oxford review</term>
<term>Para</term>
<term>Plowden report</term>
<term>Policy thrust</term>
<term>Positive discrimination</term>
<term>Primary schools</term>
<term>Primary sector</term>
<term>Proxy indicator</term>
<term>Pupil</term>
<term>Pupil base</term>
<term>Pupil base increases</term>
<term>Pupil level</term>
<term>Pupil level data</term>
<term>Pupil sample</term>
<term>Relative merits</term>
<term>Resource paradox</term>
<term>Sample schools</term>
<term>School budgets</term>
<term>School level</term>
<term>School level data</term>
<term>School sample</term>
<term>School size</term>
<term>Secondary formula</term>
<term>Secondary school</term>
<term>Secondary school budgets</term>
<term>Secondary schools</term>
<term>Secondary sector</term>
<term>Show nssen budget differences</term>
<term>Social disadvantage</term>
<term>Social disadvantage factor</term>
<term>Social disadvantage indicator</term>
<term>Social disadvantage indicators</term>
<term>Social indicators</term>
<term>Social security</term>
<term>Special education</term>
<term>Standard deviation</term>
<term>Standard deviations</term>
<term>Standard spending assessments</term>
<term>Standardised tests</term>
<term>Table viii</term>
<term>Test results</term>
<term>Total subject score</term>
<term>Variance</term>
<term>Various nssen indicators</term>
<term>Warnock report</term>
<term>Welfare benefits</term>
<term>Whole cohort</term>
<term>Year period</term>
<term>Years fsme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The 1993 Education Act introduced a Common Funding Formula (CFF) for grant‐maintained schools. The Department for Education (DFE) proposes to use free school meals entitlement (FSME) as a proxy indicator to allocate money for non‐statemented special educational needs (NSSEN). This paper concentrates on the issue of NSSEN formula funding within the secondary sector. It examines the relative merits of using different proxy indicators and more direct measures of NSSEN. It also investigates the implications and impact on secondary school budgets of moving to a CFF which uses FSME as its NSSEN indicator, and contrasts that with a local education authority's (LEA) actual formula. FSME is shown to be sa poor predictor, at an individual pupil level, of later educational attainment. These proposed changes in funding arrangement will cause significant and arbitrary gains and losses in school budgets which are not related to the numbers of pupils with special educational needs as assessed by more direct measures.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords>
<teeft>
<json:string>fsme</json:string>
<json:string>nssen</json:string>
<json:string>fsmu</json:string>
<json:string>lea</json:string>
<json:string>ncas</json:string>
<json:string>actual budget</json:string>
<json:string>school level</json:string>
<json:string>entitlement</json:string>
<json:string>funding</json:string>
<json:string>school budgets</json:string>
<json:string>secondary schools</json:string>
<json:string>proxy indicator</json:string>
<json:string>gcse</json:string>
<json:string>para</json:string>
<json:string>variance</json:string>
<json:string>local management</json:string>
<json:string>modelling</json:string>
<json:string>pupil level</json:string>
<json:string>budget differences</json:string>
<json:string>nssen budgets</json:string>
<json:string>fsme budget</json:string>
<json:string>welfare benefits</json:string>
<json:string>different ways</json:string>
<json:string>free school meals entitlement</json:string>
<json:string>gcse results</json:string>
<json:string>open university</json:string>
<json:string>total subject score</json:string>
<json:string>audit commission</json:string>
<json:string>social disadvantage</json:string>
<json:string>common funding formula</json:string>
<json:string>resource paradox</json:string>
<json:string>maximum gain</json:string>
<json:string>individual pupils</json:string>
<json:string>secondary sector</json:string>
<json:string>social indicators</json:string>
<json:string>social security</json:string>
<json:string>budget modelling</json:string>
<json:string>sample schools</json:string>
<json:string>school sample</json:string>
<json:string>nssen formula</json:string>
<json:string>nssen indicator</json:string>
<json:string>indicator</json:string>
<json:string>high correlations</json:string>
<json:string>secondary school</json:string>
<json:string>correlation analysis</json:string>
<json:string>pupil level data</json:string>
<json:string>pupil base</json:string>
<json:string>educational performance</json:string>
<json:string>social disadvantage indicator</json:string>
<json:string>educational achievement</json:string>
<json:string>plowden report</json:string>
<json:string>family credit</json:string>
<json:string>cognitive abilities test</json:string>
<json:string>actual nssen budget</json:string>
<json:string>national curriculum assessments</json:string>
<json:string>average budget variance</json:string>
<json:string>table viii</json:string>
<json:string>individual pupil level</json:string>
<json:string>relative merits</json:string>
<json:string>oxford review</json:string>
<json:string>disadvantage</json:string>
<json:string>pupil</json:string>
<json:string>free school meal numbers</json:string>
<json:string>local schools information</json:string>
<json:string>indicator readings</json:string>
<json:string>formula funding</json:string>
<json:string>nssen budget</json:string>
<json:string>standard deviation</json:string>
<json:string>actual formula</json:string>
<json:string>free school meals</json:string>
<json:string>positive discrimination</json:string>
<json:string>policy thrust</json:string>
<json:string>additional resources</json:string>
<json:string>examination results</json:string>
<json:string>nssen index</json:string>
<json:string>milton keynes</json:string>
<json:string>school level data</json:string>
<json:string>educational priority areas</json:string>
<json:string>standardised tests</json:string>
<json:string>fsmu fsme</json:string>
<json:string>marsh table</json:string>
<json:string>extra resources</json:string>
<json:string>standard deviations</json:string>
<json:string>pupil sample</json:string>
<json:string>pupil base increases</json:string>
<json:string>different proxy indicators</json:string>
<json:string>necessary provision</json:string>
<json:string>standard spending assessments</json:string>
<json:string>primary schools</json:string>
<json:string>years fsme</json:string>
<json:string>aggregate score</json:string>
<json:string>various nssen indicators</json:string>
<json:string>secondary school budgets</json:string>
<json:string>nssen resources</json:string>
<json:string>social disadvantage factor</json:string>
<json:string>important principle</json:string>
<json:string>direct measures need</json:string>
<json:string>secondary formula</json:string>
<json:string>social disadvantage indicators</json:string>
<json:string>whole cohort</json:string>
<json:string>emotional behavioural difficulties</json:string>
<json:string>year period</json:string>
<json:string>commons education committee</json:string>
<json:string>average percentage variance</json:string>
<json:string>test results</json:string>
<json:string>nssen allocation</json:string>
<json:string>nssen budget differences</json:string>
<json:string>fsmu budget</json:string>
<json:string>funding formula</json:string>
<json:string>show nssen budget differences</json:string>
<json:string>cognitive abilities</json:string>
<json:string>multilingual matters</json:string>
<json:string>primary sector</json:string>
<json:string>school size</json:string>
<json:string>fsme data</json:string>
<json:string>consultation document</json:string>
<json:string>special education</json:string>
<json:string>warnock report</json:string>
<json:string>bera dialogues</json:string>
<json:string>other indicators</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Alan J. Marsh</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>The Open University, Milton, Keynes</json:string>
<json:string>Correspondence address: Centre for Educational Policy and Management, School of Education, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<articleId>
<json:string>BERJ1097</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-B51VWC4L-D</arkIstex>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>The 1993 Education Act introduced a Common Funding Formula (CFF) for grant‐maintained schools. The Department for Education (DFE) proposes to use free school meals entitlement (FSME) as a proxy indicator to allocate money for non‐statemented special educational needs (NSSEN). This paper concentrates on the issue of NSSEN formula funding within the secondary sector. It examines the relative merits of using different proxy indicators and more direct measures of NSSEN. It also investigates the implications and impact on secondary school budgets of moving to a CFF which uses FSME as its NSSEN indicator, and contrasts that with a local education authority's (LEA) actual formula. FSME is shown to be sa poor predictor, at an individual pupil level, of later educational attainment. These proposed changes in funding arrangement will cause significant and arbitrary gains and losses in school budgets which are not related to the numbers of pupils with special educational needs as assessed by more direct measures.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>8.872</score>
<pdfWordCount>7050</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>41739</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.6</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>17</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>598.6 x 777.6 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>156</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1017</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>0</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>The Effect on School Budgets of Different Non‐statemented Special Educational Needs Indicators within a Common Funding Formula</title>
<genre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>British Educational Research Journal</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1469-3518</json:string>
</doi>
<issn>
<json:string>0141-1926</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn>
<json:string>1469-3518</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId>
<json:string>BERJ</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>21</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<pages>
<first>99</first>
<last>105</last>
<total>7</total>
</pages>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities>
<unitex>
<date>
<json:string>1992</json:string>
<json:string>1981</json:string>
<json:string>1986</json:string>
<json:string>1993</json:string>
<json:string>1960s</json:string>
<json:string>1987</json:string>
<json:string>1994</json:string>
<json:string>7</json:string>
<json:string>1988</json:string>
<json:string>1995</json:string>
<json:string>1989</json:string>
<json:string>1991</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName>
<json:string>Department for Education</json:string>
<json:string>NCA</json:string>
<json:string>House of Commons Education Committee</json:string>
<json:string>Education Reform Act and Department of Education and Science</json:string>
<json:string>Audit Commission</json:string>
<json:string>Times Educational Supplement</json:string>
<json:string>National Curriculum Task Group on Assessment and Testing</json:string>
<json:string>The Open University</json:string>
<json:string>Local Schools Information</json:string>
<json:string>DFE</json:string>
<json:string>Department of the Environment</json:string>
<json:string>British Educational Research Association</json:string>
<json:string>The Funding Agency for Schools</json:string>
<json:string>FAS</json:string>
<json:string>Sheffield University</json:string>
<json:string>DES</json:string>
<json:string>National Curriculum Assessments</json:string>
<json:string>Open University</json:string>
<json:string>Plowden Report</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Education and Science</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName>
<json:string>Ilia</json:string>
<json:string>Alan Marsh</json:string>
<json:string>Illb</json:string>
<json:string>John Patten</json:string>
<json:string>Derrick Armstrong</json:string>
<json:string>The</json:string>
<json:string>Table</json:string>
<json:string>A. J. Marsh</json:string>
<json:string>Commission</json:string>
<json:string>Rosalind Levacic</json:string>
<json:string>I. Sample</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName></placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl>
<json:string>Dessent, 1987, p. 17</json:string>
<json:string>Evans & Lunt, 1993</json:string>
<json:string>Department for Education [DFE], 1992, 1993a</json:string>
<json:string>Stewart, 1992</json:string>
<json:string>DFE, 1993b</json:string>
<json:string>Walsh et al., 1985</json:string>
<json:string>Local Schools Information, 1993</json:string>
<json:string>Lee, 1992a</json:string>
<json:string>Bauer (1966)</json:string>
<json:string>DFE, 1993a</json:string>
<json:string>Mortimore et al., 1988</json:string>
<json:string>Arnott et al. (1992)</json:string>
<json:string>see Halsey, 1972</json:string>
<json:string>National Curriculum TGAT, 1988</json:string>
<json:string>December 1989</json:string>
<json:string>DES, 1978</json:string>
<json:string>Gray et al., 1984</json:string>
<json:string>DES, 1989</json:string>
<json:string>McConville et al. (1990)</json:string>
<json:string>January 1993</json:string>
<json:string>Silver, 1991</json:string>
<json:string>Thorndike et al., 1986</json:string>
<json:string>Lee (1992a)</json:string>
<json:string>DFE, 1992</json:string>
<json:string>DES, 1988</json:string>
<json:string>April 1994</json:string>
<json:string>see McPherson, 1992</json:string>
<json:string>Department of the Environment, 1990</json:string>
<json:string>Lee, 1992c</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark>
<json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-B51VWC4L-D</json:string>
</ark>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>1 - social science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - education & educational research</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix>
<json:string>1 - economic & social sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - social sciences</json:string>
<json:string>3 - education</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus>
<json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Education</json:string>
</scopus>
<inist>
<json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string>
<json:string>2 - sciences de l'education</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>1995</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>1995</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1080/0141192950210108</json:string>
</doi>
<id>A5A9ECF7217474D64D94FC1E25771BE0C473E377</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A5A9ECF7217474D64D94FC1E25771BE0C473E377/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A5A9ECF7217474D64D94FC1E25771BE0C473E377/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A5A9ECF7217474D64D94FC1E25771BE0C473E377/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main">The Effect on School Budgets of Different Non‐statemented Special Educational Needs Indicators within a Common Funding Formula</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability>
<licence>1995 British Educational Research Association</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="1995-02"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="article">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">The Effect on School Budgets of Different Non‐statemented Special Educational Needs Indicators within a Common Funding Formula</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Alan J.</forename>
<surname>Marsh</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>The Open University, Milton, Keynes</affiliation>
<affiliation>Centre for Educational Policy and Management, School of Education, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">A5A9ECF7217474D64D94FC1E25771BE0C473E377</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-B51VWC4L-D</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1080/0141192950210108</idno>
<idno type="unit">BERJ1097</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:BERJ.BERJ1097.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j" type="main">British Educational Research Journal</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0141-1926</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1469-3518</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1469-3518</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1002/berj.1995.21.issue-1</idno>
<idno type="product">BERJ</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="99">99</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="105">105</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1995-02"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<abstract xml:lang="en" style="main">
<head>Abstract</head>
<p>The 1993 Education Act introduced a Common Funding Formula (CFF) for grant‐maintained schools. The Department for Education (DFE) proposes to use free school meals entitlement (FSME) as a proxy indicator to allocate money for non‐statemented special educational needs (NSSEN). This paper concentrates on the issue of NSSEN formula funding within the secondary sector. It examines the relative merits of using different proxy indicators and more direct measures of NSSEN. It also investigates the implications and impact on secondary school budgets of moving to a CFF which uses FSME as its NSSEN indicator, and contrasts that with a local education authority's (LEA) actual formula. FSME is shown to be sa poor predictor, at an individual pupil level, of later educational attainment. These proposed changes in funding arrangement will cause significant and arbitrary gains and losses in school budgets which are not related to the numbers of pupils with special educational needs as assessed by more direct measures.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1">
<term>Original Article</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A5A9ECF7217474D64D94FC1E25771BE0C473E377/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document>
<component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en">
<header>
<publicationMeta level="product">
<publisherInfo>
<publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1469-3518</doi>
<issn type="print">0141-1926</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1469-3518</issn>
<idGroup>
<id type="product" value="BERJ"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main" sort="BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL">British Educational Research Journal</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="02101">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1002/berj.1995.21.issue-1</doi>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="journalVolume" number="21">21</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="1995-02">February 1995</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="8" status="forIssue">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1080/0141192950210108</doi>
<idGroup>
<id type="unit" value="BERJ1097"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup>
<count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="tocHeading1">Original Article</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>1995 British Educational Research Association</copyright>
<eventGroup>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.9 mode:FullText" date="2012-12-18"></event>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2013-01-02"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-01-02"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-07"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="pageFirst" number="99">99</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="105">105</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo>Centre for Educational Policy and Management, School of Education, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup>
<link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:BERJ.BERJ1097.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta>
<countGroup>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="37"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="2"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main">The Effect on School Budgets of Different Non‐statemented Special Educational Needs Indicators within a Common Funding Formula</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes">
<personName>
<givenNames>Alan J.</givenNames>
<familyName>Marsh</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup>
<affiliation xml:id="a1">
<unparsedAffiliation>The Open University, Milton, Keynes</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<abstractGroup>
<abstract type="main" xml:lang="en">
<title type="main">Abstract</title>
<p>The 1993 Education Act introduced a Common Funding Formula (CFF) for grant‐maintained schools. The Department for Education (DFE) proposes to use free school meals entitlement (FSME) as a proxy indicator to allocate money for non‐statemented special educational needs (NSSEN). This paper concentrates on the issue of NSSEN formula funding within the secondary sector. It examines the relative merits of using different proxy indicators and more direct measures of NSSEN. It also investigates the implications and impact on secondary school budgets of moving to a CFF which uses FSME as its NSSEN indicator, and contrasts that with a local education authority's (LEA) actual formula. FSME is shown to be sa poor predictor, at an individual pupil level, of later educational attainment. These proposed changes in funding arrangement will cause significant and arbitrary gains and losses in school budgets which are not related to the numbers of pupils with special educational needs as assessed by more direct measures.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>The Effect on School Budgets of Different Non‐statemented Special Educational Needs Indicators within a Common Funding Formula</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en">
<title>The Effect on School Budgets of Different Non‐statemented Special Educational Needs Indicators within a Common Funding Formula</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alan J.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Marsh</namePart>
<affiliation>The Open University, Milton, Keynes</affiliation>
<affiliation>Correspondence address: Centre for Educational Policy and Management, School of Education, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-02</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1995</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<extent unit="references">37</extent>
<extent unit="linksCrossRef">2</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">The 1993 Education Act introduced a Common Funding Formula (CFF) for grant‐maintained schools. The Department for Education (DFE) proposes to use free school meals entitlement (FSME) as a proxy indicator to allocate money for non‐statemented special educational needs (NSSEN). This paper concentrates on the issue of NSSEN formula funding within the secondary sector. It examines the relative merits of using different proxy indicators and more direct measures of NSSEN. It also investigates the implications and impact on secondary school budgets of moving to a CFF which uses FSME as its NSSEN indicator, and contrasts that with a local education authority's (LEA) actual formula. FSME is shown to be sa poor predictor, at an individual pupil level, of later educational attainment. These proposed changes in funding arrangement will cause significant and arbitrary gains and losses in school budgets which are not related to the numbers of pupils with special educational needs as assessed by more direct measures.</abstract>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>British Educational Research Journal</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0141-1926</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1469-3518</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1469-3518</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">BERJ</identifier>
<part>
<date>1995</date>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>21</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<caption>no.</caption>
<number>1</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>99</start>
<end>105</end>
<total>7</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">A5A9ECF7217474D64D94FC1E25771BE0C473E377</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-B51VWC4L-D</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1080/0141192950210108</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">BERJ1097</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">1995 British Educational Research Association</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A5A9ECF7217474D64D94FC1E25771BE0C473E377/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005300 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005300 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:A5A9ECF7217474D64D94FC1E25771BE0C473E377
   |texte=   The Effect on School Budgets of Different Non‐statemented Special Educational Needs Indicators within a Common Funding Formula
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022