Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth
Identifieur interne : 005207 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005206; suivant : 005208Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth
Auteurs : C. H. F. H Mmerle ; D. Wagner ; U. Br Gger ; A. Lussi ; A. Karayiannis ; A. Joss ; N. P. LangSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1995-06.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the threshold of tactile perception of endosseous dental implants and to assess the relative difference of that threshold between implants and teeth. Twenty‐two subjects with implants of the ITI® Dental Implant System were included in the study. All implants served as abutments for single tooth crowns and had been in function for a minimum of 1 year. A strain gauge glued to the shaft of an amalgam plugger served as a force sensor. It transformed the elastic deformation exerted onto the shaft into an electronic signal for recording. By use of the amalgam plugger, a continuously increasing force was exercised on the implants or teeth until the first sensation of touch was indicated by the patient. Statistical analysis revealed threshold values for the implants ranging from 13.2 to 189.4g (1g=0.0lN)(mean 100.6; SD 47.7), while a range of 1.2 to 26.2g (mean 11.5; SD 11.5) was found for control teeth. Thus, the mean threshold values for implants were 8.75 times higher than for teeth. This difference was highly statistically significant. A general linear models procedure was applied to determine the influence of patient age, jaw, implant position and the threshold values of teeth on the measurements obtained for implants. Only gender and the threshold values for contralateral teeth had a significant influence. These 2 parameters together explained 27% of the variability in threshold measurements. It is concluded that a more than 8‐fold higher threshold value for tactile perception exists for implants compared with teeth.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060203.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A3C37C1E565727E6F6177533C1FB2A521F0B8BEBLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth</title><author><name sortKey="H Mmerle, C H F" sort="H Mmerle, C H F" uniqKey="H Mmerle C" first="C. H. F." last="H Mmerle">C. H. F. H Mmerle</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wagner, D" sort="Wagner, D" uniqKey="Wagner D" first="D." last="Wagner">D. Wagner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Br Gger, U" sort="Br Gger, U" uniqKey="Br Gger U" first="U." last="Br Gger">U. Br Gger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lussi, A" sort="Lussi, A" uniqKey="Lussi A" first="A." last="Lussi">A. Lussi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Karayiannis, A" sort="Karayiannis, A" uniqKey="Karayiannis A" first="A." last="Karayiannis">A. Karayiannis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Joss, A" sort="Joss, A" uniqKey="Joss A" first="A." last="Joss">A. Joss</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, N P" sort="Lang, N P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="N. P." last="Lang">N. P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A3C37C1E565727E6F6177533C1FB2A521F0B8BEB</idno><date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060203.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A3C37C1E565727E6F6177533C1FB2A521F0B8BEB/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005207</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005207</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth</title><author><name sortKey="H Mmerle, C H F" sort="H Mmerle, C H F" uniqKey="H Mmerle C" first="C. H. F." last="H Mmerle">C. H. F. H Mmerle</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wagner, D" sort="Wagner, D" uniqKey="Wagner D" first="D." last="Wagner">D. Wagner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Br Gger, U" sort="Br Gger, U" uniqKey="Br Gger U" first="U." last="Br Gger">U. Br Gger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lussi, A" sort="Lussi, A" uniqKey="Lussi A" first="A." last="Lussi">A. Lussi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Karayiannis, A" sort="Karayiannis, A" uniqKey="Karayiannis A" first="A." last="Karayiannis">A. Karayiannis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Joss, A" sort="Joss, A" uniqKey="Joss A" first="A." last="Joss">A. Joss</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, N P" sort="Lang, N P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="N. P." last="Lang">N. P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="83">83</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="90">90</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-06">1995-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this study was to determine the threshold of tactile perception of endosseous dental implants and to assess the relative difference of that threshold between implants and teeth. Twenty‐two subjects with implants of the ITI® Dental Implant System were included in the study. All implants served as abutments for single tooth crowns and had been in function for a minimum of 1 year. A strain gauge glued to the shaft of an amalgam plugger served as a force sensor. It transformed the elastic deformation exerted onto the shaft into an electronic signal for recording. By use of the amalgam plugger, a continuously increasing force was exercised on the implants or teeth until the first sensation of touch was indicated by the patient. Statistical analysis revealed threshold values for the implants ranging from 13.2 to 189.4g (1g=0.0lN)(mean 100.6; SD 47.7), while a range of 1.2 to 26.2g (mean 11.5; SD 11.5) was found for control teeth. Thus, the mean threshold values for implants were 8.75 times higher than for teeth. This difference was highly statistically significant. A general linear models procedure was applied to determine the influence of patient age, jaw, implant position and the threshold values of teeth on the measurements obtained for implants. Only gender and the threshold values for contralateral teeth had a significant influence. These 2 parameters together explained 27% of the variability in threshold measurements. It is concluded that a more than 8‐fold higher threshold value for tactile perception exists for implants compared with teeth.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>C. H. F. Hämmerle</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>D. Wagner</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>U. Brägger</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>A. Lussi</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>A. Karayiannis</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>A. Joss</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>N. P. Lang</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>endosseous implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>tactile perception</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mechanoreception</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>psychophysical threshold</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>occlusal force</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR060203</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-X7M0BL4J-H</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The aim of this study was to determine the threshold of tactile perception of endosseous dental implants and to assess the relative difference of that threshold between implants and teeth. Twenty‐two subjects with implants of the ITI® Dental Implant System were included in the study. All implants served as abutments for single tooth crowns and had been in function for a minimum of 1 year. A strain gauge glued to the shaft of an amalgam plugger served as a force sensor. It transformed the elastic deformation exerted onto the shaft into an electronic signal for recording. By use of the amalgam plugger, a continuously increasing force was exercised on the implants or teeth until the first sensation of touch was indicated by the patient. Statistical analysis revealed threshold values for the implants ranging from 13.2 to 189.4g (1g=0.0lN)(mean 100.6; SD 47.7), while a range of 1.2 to 26.2g (mean 11.5; SD 11.5) was found for control teeth. Thus, the mean threshold values for implants were 8.75 times higher than for teeth. This difference was highly statistically significant. A general linear models procedure was applied to determine the influence of patient age, jaw, implant position and the threshold values of teeth on the measurements obtained for implants. Only gender and the threshold values for contralateral teeth had a significant influence. These 2 parameters together explained 27% of the variability in threshold measurements. It is concluded that a more than 8‐fold higher threshold value for tactile perception exists for implants compared with teeth.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.05</score><pdfWordCount>0</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>0</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>567 x 780 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>251</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1579</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth</title><pmid><json:string>7578785</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>83</first><last>90</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1995</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-X7M0BL4J-H</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1995</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060203.x</json:string></doi><id>A3C37C1E565727E6F6177533C1FB2A521F0B8BEB</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A3C37C1E565727E6F6177533C1FB2A521F0B8BEB/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>ocr</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/ocr</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A3C37C1E565727E6F6177533C1FB2A521F0B8BEB/fulltext/ocr</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A3C37C1E565727E6F6177533C1FB2A521F0B8BEB/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A3C37C1E565727E6F6177533C1FB2A521F0B8BEB/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth</title><title level="a" type="short">Tactile perception of implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">C. H. F.</forename><surname>Hämmerle</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">D.</forename><surname>Wagner</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">U.</forename><surname>Brägger</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">A.</forename><surname>Lussi</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">A.</forename><surname>Karayiannis</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">A.</forename><surname>Joss</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0006"><persName><forename type="first">N. P.</forename><surname>Lang</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">A3C37C1E565727E6F6177533C1FB2A521F0B8BEB</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-X7M0BL4J-H</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060203.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR060203</idno><idno type="supplier"></idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR060203.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.1995.6.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="83">83</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="90">90</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>The aim of this study was to determine the threshold of tactile perception of endosseous dental implants and to assess the relative difference of that threshold between implants and teeth. Twenty‐two subjects with implants of the ITI® Dental Implant System were included in the study. All implants served as abutments for single tooth crowns and had been in function for a minimum of 1 year. A strain gauge glued to the shaft of an amalgam plugger served as a force sensor. It transformed the elastic deformation exerted onto the shaft into an electronic signal for recording. By use of the amalgam plugger, a continuously increasing force was exercised on the implants or teeth until the first sensation of touch was indicated by the patient. Statistical analysis revealed threshold values for the implants ranging from 13.2 to 189.4g (1g=0.0lN)(mean 100.6; SD 47.7), while a range of 1.2 to 26.2g (mean 11.5; SD 11.5) was found for control teeth. Thus, the mean threshold values for implants were 8.75 times higher than for teeth. This difference was highly statistically significant. A general linear models procedure was applied to determine the influence of patient age, jaw, implant position and the threshold values of teeth on the measurements obtained for implants. Only gender and the threshold values for contralateral teeth had a significant influence. These 2 parameters together explained 27% of the variability in threshold measurements. It is concluded that a more than 8‐fold higher threshold value for tactile perception exists for implants compared with teeth.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">endosseous implants</term><term xml:id="k2">tactile perception</term><term xml:id="k3">mechanoreception</term><term xml:id="k4">psychophysical threshold</term><term xml:id="k5">occlusal force</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change>undefined</change><change>[object Object]</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A3C37C1E565727E6F6177533C1FB2A521F0B8BEB/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.1995.6.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="6">6</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1995-06">June 1995</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0008300" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060203.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR060203"></id><id type="supplier" value=""></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-06-27"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-06-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="83">83</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="90">90</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Christoph Hämmerle, Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Berne, CH‐3010 Berne, Switzerland</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR060203.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 22 August 1994</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth</title><title type="shortAuthors">Hämmerle et al.</title><title type="short">Tactile perception of implants</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>C. H. F.</givenNames><familyName>Hämmerle</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>D.</givenNames><familyName>Wagner</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>U.</givenNames><familyName>Brägger</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>A.</givenNames><familyName>Lussi</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>A.</givenNames><familyName>Karayiannis</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>A.</givenNames><familyName>Joss</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr7" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>N. P.</givenNames><familyName>Lang</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">endosseous implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">tactile perception</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">mechanoreception</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">psychophysical threshold</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">occlusal force</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The aim of this study was to determine the threshold of tactile perception of endosseous dental implants and to assess the relative difference of that threshold between implants and teeth. Twenty‐two subjects with implants of the ITI® Dental Implant System were included in the study. All implants served as abutments for single tooth crowns and had been in function for a minimum of 1 year. A strain gauge glued to the shaft of an amalgam plugger served as a force sensor. It transformed the elastic deformation exerted onto the shaft into an electronic signal for recording. By use of the amalgam plugger, a continuously increasing force was exercised on the implants or teeth until the first sensation of touch was indicated by the patient. Statistical analysis revealed threshold values for the implants ranging from 13.2 to 189.4g (1g=0.0lN)(mean 100.6; SD 47.7), while a range of 1.2 to 26.2g (mean 11.5; SD 11.5) was found for control teeth. Thus, the mean threshold values for implants were 8.75 times higher than for teeth. This difference was highly statistically significant. A general linear models procedure was applied to determine the influence of patient age, jaw, implant position and the threshold values of teeth on the measurements obtained for implants. Only gender and the threshold values for contralateral teeth had a significant influence. These 2 parameters together explained 27% of the variability in threshold measurements. It is concluded that a more than 8‐fold higher threshold value for tactile perception exists for implants compared with teeth.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Tactile perception of implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C. H. F.</namePart><namePart type="family">Hämmerle</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D.</namePart><namePart type="family">Wagner</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">U.</namePart><namePart type="family">Brägger</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lussi</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Karayiannis</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Joss</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">N. P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lang</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-06</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 22 August 1994</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1995</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The aim of this study was to determine the threshold of tactile perception of endosseous dental implants and to assess the relative difference of that threshold between implants and teeth. Twenty‐two subjects with implants of the ITI® Dental Implant System were included in the study. All implants served as abutments for single tooth crowns and had been in function for a minimum of 1 year. A strain gauge glued to the shaft of an amalgam plugger served as a force sensor. It transformed the elastic deformation exerted onto the shaft into an electronic signal for recording. By use of the amalgam plugger, a continuously increasing force was exercised on the implants or teeth until the first sensation of touch was indicated by the patient. Statistical analysis revealed threshold values for the implants ranging from 13.2 to 189.4g (1g=0.0lN)(mean 100.6; SD 47.7), while a range of 1.2 to 26.2g (mean 11.5; SD 11.5) was found for control teeth. Thus, the mean threshold values for implants were 8.75 times higher than for teeth. This difference was highly statistically significant. A general linear models procedure was applied to determine the influence of patient age, jaw, implant position and the threshold values of teeth on the measurements obtained for implants. Only gender and the threshold values for contralateral teeth had a significant influence. These 2 parameters together explained 27% of the variability in threshold measurements. It is concluded that a more than 8‐fold higher threshold value for tactile perception exists for implants compared with teeth.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>endosseous implants</topic><topic>tactile perception</topic><topic>mechanoreception</topic><topic>psychophysical threshold</topic><topic>occlusal force</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>1995</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>6</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>83</start><end>90</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A3C37C1E565727E6F6177533C1FB2A521F0B8BEB</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-X7M0BL4J-H</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060203.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR060203</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A3C37C1E565727E6F6177533C1FB2A521F0B8BEB/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005207 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005207 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A3C37C1E565727E6F6177533C1FB2A521F0B8BEB
|texte= Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |