RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3‐year follow‐up
Identifieur interne : 005132 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 005131; suivant : 005133RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3‐year follow‐up
Auteurs : Elena A. Nicu ; Nele Van Assche ; Wim Coucke ; Wim Teughels ; Marc QuirynenSource :
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 2012-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Aerobic bacteria, Albrektsson, Albrektsson wennerberg, Anterior mandible, Assche, Bacterial count, Biochemical parameters, Bollen, Bone level change measurement, Bone level changes, Bone loss, Branemark system implants, Catholic university leuven, Chronic periodontitis, Clin periodontol, Clinical attachment level, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical outcome, Clinical parameters, Clinical periodontology, Clinical results, Clinical trials, Collagenase activity, Crevicular, Dental implants, Dental research, Dentistry, Detection frequency, Edentulous, Edentulous mandibles, Edentulous patients, Edentulous subgroup, Edentulous subjects, Extreme values, Full bridge, Full overdenture, Gingival crevicular, Gingival recession, Healing abutments, Immediate loading, Implant, Implant failure, Implant surface roughness, Implant surfaces, Implant therapy, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofacial, Microbial counts, Microbiological, More favourable, Natural teeth, Nobel biocare, Oral hygiene, Oral maxillofacial implants, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated implants, Osteoclast, Osteoclast differentiation, Osteoprotegerin ligand, Other hand, Overdenture, Partial dentures, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal research, Periodontitis, Periodontitis patients, Periodontology, Pilot study, Plaque, Plaque accumulation, Pocket depth, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Present study, Prevotella intermedia, Prospective study, Quirynen, Rankl, Rankl levels, Receptor activator, Rough implant surfaces, Rough implants, Rough surface, Rough surfaces, Roughness, Same macro design, Spontaneous progression, Study population, Subgingival, Subgingival plaque, Supragingival areas, Surface roughness, Systematic review, Threshold surface roughness, Titanium, Titanium implants, Tiunite, Total units, Wennerberg.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Aerobic bacteria, Albrektsson, Albrektsson wennerberg, Anterior mandible, Assche, Bacterial count, Biochemical parameters, Bollen, Bone level change measurement, Bone level changes, Bone loss, Branemark system implants, Catholic university leuven, Chronic periodontitis, Clin periodontol, Clinical attachment level, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical outcome, Clinical parameters, Clinical periodontology, Clinical results, Clinical trials, Collagenase activity, Crevicular, Dental implants, Dental research, Dentistry, Detection frequency, Edentulous, Edentulous mandibles, Edentulous patients, Edentulous subgroup, Edentulous subjects, Extreme values, Full bridge, Full overdenture, Gingival crevicular, Gingival recession, Healing abutments, Immediate loading, Implant, Implant failure, Implant surface roughness, Implant surfaces, Implant therapy, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofacial, Microbial counts, Microbiological, More favourable, Natural teeth, Nobel biocare, Oral hygiene, Oral maxillofacial implants, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated implants, Osteoclast, Osteoclast differentiation, Osteoprotegerin ligand, Other hand, Overdenture, Partial dentures, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal research, Periodontitis, Periodontitis patients, Periodontology, Pilot study, Plaque, Plaque accumulation, Pocket depth, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Present study, Prevotella intermedia, Prospective study, Quirynen, Rankl, Rankl levels, Receptor activator, Rough implant surfaces, Rough implants, Rough surface, Rough surfaces, Roughness, Same macro design, Spontaneous progression, Study population, Subgingival, Subgingival plaque, Supragingival areas, Surface roughness, Systematic review, Threshold surface roughness, Titanium, Titanium implants, Tiunite, Total units, Wennerberg.
Abstract
This 3‐year prospective randomized controlled trial compared the clinical, microbiological and biochemical outcome of minimally (Turned, Tur) and moderately rough (TiUnite®, TiU) implant surfaces in a split‐mouth design.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12022
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A267E167F28BA3789AA66CE600DD8D3AFDDAFEE4Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3‐year follow‐up</title><author><name sortKey="Nicu, Elena A" sort="Nicu, Elena A" uniqKey="Nicu E" first="Elena A." last="Nicu">Elena A. Nicu</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, Nele" sort="Van Assche, Nele" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="Nele" last="Van Assche">Nele Van Assche</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coucke, Wim" sort="Coucke, Wim" uniqKey="Coucke W" first="Wim" last="Coucke">Wim Coucke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Teughels, Wim" sort="Teughels, Wim" uniqKey="Teughels W" first="Wim" last="Teughels">Wim Teughels</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Address:E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A267E167F28BA3789AA66CE600DD8D3AFDDAFEE4</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/jcpe.12022</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A267E167F28BA3789AA66CE600DD8D3AFDDAFEE4/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005132</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005132</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main"><hi rend="fc">RCT</hi> comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3‐year follow‐up</title><author><name sortKey="Nicu, Elena A" sort="Nicu, Elena A" uniqKey="Nicu E" first="Elena A." last="Nicu">Elena A. Nicu</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, Nele" sort="Van Assche, Nele" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="Nele" last="Van Assche">Nele Van Assche</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coucke, Wim" sort="Coucke, Wim" uniqKey="Coucke W" first="Wim" last="Coucke">Wim Coucke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Teughels, Wim" sort="Teughels, Wim" uniqKey="Teughels W" first="Wim" last="Teughels">Wim Teughels</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Address:E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1183">1183</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1190">1190</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2012-12">2012-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Aerobic bacteria</term><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Albrektsson wennerberg</term><term>Anterior mandible</term><term>Assche</term><term>Bacterial count</term><term>Biochemical parameters</term><term>Bollen</term><term>Bone level change measurement</term><term>Bone level changes</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Branemark system implants</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Chronic periodontitis</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical attachment level</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical outcome</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical results</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Collagenase activity</term><term>Crevicular</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Detection frequency</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandibles</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous subgroup</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Extreme values</term><term>Full bridge</term><term>Full overdenture</term><term>Gingival crevicular</term><term>Gingival recession</term><term>Healing abutments</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant surface roughness</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Microbial counts</term><term>Microbiological</term><term>More favourable</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osteoclast</term><term>Osteoclast differentiation</term><term>Osteoprotegerin ligand</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal research</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontitis patients</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque accumulation</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Porphyromonas gingivalis</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prevotella intermedia</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Rankl</term><term>Rankl levels</term><term>Receptor activator</term><term>Rough implant surfaces</term><term>Rough implants</term><term>Rough surface</term><term>Rough surfaces</term><term>Roughness</term><term>Same macro design</term><term>Spontaneous progression</term><term>Study population</term><term>Subgingival</term><term>Subgingival plaque</term><term>Supragingival areas</term><term>Surface roughness</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Threshold surface roughness</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Tiunite</term><term>Total units</term><term>Wennerberg</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Aerobic bacteria</term><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Albrektsson wennerberg</term><term>Anterior mandible</term><term>Assche</term><term>Bacterial count</term><term>Biochemical parameters</term><term>Bollen</term><term>Bone level change measurement</term><term>Bone level changes</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Branemark system implants</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Chronic periodontitis</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical attachment level</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical outcome</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical results</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Collagenase activity</term><term>Crevicular</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Detection frequency</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandibles</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous subgroup</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Extreme values</term><term>Full bridge</term><term>Full overdenture</term><term>Gingival crevicular</term><term>Gingival recession</term><term>Healing abutments</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant surface roughness</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Microbial counts</term><term>Microbiological</term><term>More favourable</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osteoclast</term><term>Osteoclast differentiation</term><term>Osteoprotegerin ligand</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal research</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontitis patients</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque accumulation</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Porphyromonas gingivalis</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prevotella intermedia</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Rankl</term><term>Rankl levels</term><term>Receptor activator</term><term>Rough implant surfaces</term><term>Rough implants</term><term>Rough surface</term><term>Rough surfaces</term><term>Roughness</term><term>Same macro design</term><term>Spontaneous progression</term><term>Study population</term><term>Subgingival</term><term>Subgingival plaque</term><term>Supragingival areas</term><term>Surface roughness</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Threshold surface roughness</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Tiunite</term><term>Total units</term><term>Wennerberg</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">This 3‐year prospective randomized controlled trial compared the clinical, microbiological and biochemical outcome of minimally (Turned, Tur) and moderately rough (TiUnite®, TiU) implant surfaces in a split‐mouth design.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>quirynen</json:string><json:string>rankl</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>periodontitis</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>tiunite</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>implant surfaces</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>crevicular</json:string><json:string>subgingival</json:string><json:string>osteoclast</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>rough implants</json:string><json:string>wennerberg</json:string><json:string>microbiological</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>albrektsson</json:string><json:string>assche</json:string><json:string>bollen</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>surface roughness</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>full bridge</json:string><json:string>edentulous subjects</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>bone level changes</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>pocket depth</json:string><json:string>clinical attachment level</json:string><json:string>full overdenture</json:string><json:string>roughness</json:string><json:string>healing abutments</json:string><json:string>rough surfaces</json:string><json:string>plaque accumulation</json:string><json:string>osteoclast differentiation</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>porphyromonas gingivalis</json:string><json:string>detection frequency</json:string><json:string>oral hygiene</json:string><json:string>implant surface roughness</json:string><json:string>clinical outcome</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>rough implant surfaces</json:string><json:string>subgingival plaque</json:string><json:string>clinical parameters</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>receptor activator</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>biochemical parameters</json:string><json:string>catholic university leuven</json:string><json:string>albrektsson wennerberg</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>gingival recession</json:string><json:string>edentulous subgroup</json:string><json:string>microbial counts</json:string><json:string>bone level change measurement</json:string><json:string>bacterial count</json:string><json:string>more favourable</json:string><json:string>aerobic bacteria</json:string><json:string>extreme values</json:string><json:string>total units</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>prevotella intermedia</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>rankl levels</json:string><json:string>threshold surface roughness</json:string><json:string>supragingival areas</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>periodontitis patients</json:string><json:string>clinical results</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>rough surface</json:string><json:string>spontaneous progression</json:string><json:string>anterior mandible</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>collagenase activity</json:string><json:string>periodontal research</json:string><json:string>branemark system implants</json:string><json:string>clinical trials</json:string><json:string>same macro design</json:string><json:string>pilot study</json:string><json:string>study population</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandibles</json:string><json:string>osteoprotegerin ligand</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>gingival crevicular</json:string><json:string>chronic periodontitis</json:string><json:string>implant therapy</json:string><json:string>dental research</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Elena A. Nicu</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Nele Van Assche</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Wim Coucke</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Wim Teughels</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marc Quirynen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Address:E‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>clinical evaluation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant surface roughness</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>microbiology</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osteoprotegerin</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>RANKL</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>turned</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>TiUnite®</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JCPE12022</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-SPZDHP85-4</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This 3‐year prospective randomized controlled trial compared the clinical, microbiological and biochemical outcome of minimally (Turned, Tur) and moderately rough (TiUnite®, TiU) implant surfaces in a split‐mouth design.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.336</score><pdfWordCount>5557</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>37179</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>28</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>220</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>8</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3‐year follow‐up</title><pmid><json:string>23151294</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0303-6979</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-051X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JCPE</json:string></publisherId><volume>39</volume><issue>12</issue><pages><first>1183</first><last>1190</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Randomized Clinical Trial</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012-10-01</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Leuven, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Department of Clinical Biology, Scienti</json:string><json:string>Catholic University</json:string><json:string>Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium Nicu EA, Van Assche N, Coucke W, Teughels W, Quirynen M</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Lindquist</json:string><json:string>Marc Quirynen</json:string><json:string>Age</json:string><json:string>Oh</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Van Assche</json:string><json:string>Serino</json:string><json:string>Strom</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Finland</json:string><json:string>NY</json:string><json:string>Smithtown</json:string><json:string>Helsinki</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1993, 1996</json:string><json:string>Roynesdal et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Becker et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Apse et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2005b</json:string><json:string>Lacey et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Van Assche et al. 2012</json:string><json:string>Nicu et al.</json:string><json:string>Leonhardt et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2005a</json:string><json:string>Serino & Strom 2009</json:string><json:string>Wennerberg & Albrektsson 2000</json:string><json:string>Suda et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Duarte et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Teughels et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Karbach et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Amoroso et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Albouy et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Rocci et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Nicu et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Di Carmine et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Hsu et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Nomura et al. 1998, 2000</json:string><json:string>Astrand et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Alsaadi et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Degidi et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Meyle 1999</json:string><json:string>Jungner et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Oh et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>De Boever et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Lee et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Ivanoff et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Lindquist et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Alsaadi et al. 1183</json:string><json:string>Lee et al.</json:string><json:string>Bollen et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Albouy et al.</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson & Wennerberg 2004</json:string><json:string>Cochran et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Burgers et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Hultin et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Lu et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Froberg et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>AlNawas et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Elter et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Mombelli et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Bollen et al. 1996</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-SPZDHP85-4</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/jcpe.12022</json:string></doi><id>A267E167F28BA3789AA66CE600DD8D3AFDDAFEE4</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A267E167F28BA3789AA66CE600DD8D3AFDDAFEE4/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A267E167F28BA3789AA66CE600DD8D3AFDDAFEE4/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A267E167F28BA3789AA66CE600DD8D3AFDDAFEE4/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main"><hi rend="fc">RCT</hi> comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3‐year follow‐up</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main"><hi rend="fc">RCT</hi> comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3‐year follow‐up</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Elena A.</forename><surname>Nicu</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Amsterdam</settlement><country key="NL">The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Nele</forename><surname>Assche</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Wim</forename><surname>Coucke</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Clinical Biology</orgName><orgName>Scientific Institute of Public Health</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Brussels</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Wim</forename><surname>Teughels</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Marc</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Address: Marc Quirynen Catholic University Leuven, Department of Periodontology Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000 Leuven, Belgium E‐mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">A267E167F28BA3789AA66CE600DD8D3AFDDAFEE4</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SPZDHP85-4</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/jcpe.12022</idno><idno type="unit">JCPE12022</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JCPE.JCPE12022.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jcpe.2012.39.issue-12</idno><idno type="product">JCPE</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1183">1183</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1190">1190</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2012-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main" xml:id="jcpe12022-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Aim
<p>This 3‐year prospective randomized controlled trial compared the clinical, microbiological and biochemical outcome of minimally (Turned, Tur) and moderately rough (TiUnite<hi rend="superscript">®</hi>, TiU) implant surfaces in a split‐mouth design.</p>
Material and methods
<p>The study population included 14 subjects: nine fully edentulous and five partially edentulous subjects with a history of periodontitis. Implants (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 78, 39 Tur and 39 TiU) were installed randomly in each patient. Peri‐implant clinical parameters and intra‐oral radiographs were recorded after 3 years of loading. Subgingival plaque and peri‐implant crevicular fluid samples were collected and analysed using culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the biofilm, and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay for the concentration of osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa‐B ligand, respectively.</p>
Results
<p>No statistically significant differences in clinical, microbiological and biochemical parameters could be observed when comparing the Tur and TiU implant surfaces.</p>
Conclusion
<p>After 3 years of loading, in periodontitis susceptible patients, the moderately rough, TiU implants demonstrated a similar clinical outcome compared with the smoother, turned implants. Longer follow‐up and studies using different implant types are needed to confirm the statement that minimally and moderately rough implant surfaces perform similar, both from a clinical and from a microbiological point of view.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0001">bone loss</term><term xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0002">clinical evaluation</term><term xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0003">implant surface roughness</term><term xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0004">microbiology</term><term xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0005">osteoprotegerin</term><term xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0006"><hi rend="fc">RANKL</hi></term><term xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0007">turned</term><term xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0008">TiUnite<hi rend="superscript">®</hi></term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Randomized Clinical Trial</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Implant Therapy</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A267E167F28BA3789AA66CE600DD8D3AFDDAFEE4/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="jcpe12022" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</doi><issn type="print">0303-6979</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-051X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPE"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title type="short">J Clin Periodontol</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="120"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jcpe.2012.39.issue-12</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="39" type="journalVolume">39</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">12</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-12">December 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="90" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/jcpe.12022</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCPE12022"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="8" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title type="tocHeading1">Implant Therapy</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2012-09-16" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2012-10-01" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAccepted" date="2012-09-23"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-11-14"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-11-14"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">1183</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">1190</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line>Address:</line><line><i>Marc Quirynen</i></line><line><i>Catholic University Leuven, Department of Periodontology</i></line><line><i>Kapucijnenvoer 33,</i></line><line><i>3000 Leuven,</i></line><line><i>Belgium</i></line><line>E‐mail: <email>marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="jcpe12022-cit-1001"><author><familyName>Nicu</familyName> <givenNames>EA</givenNames></author>, <author><familyNamePrefix>Van</familyNamePrefix><familyName>Assche</familyName> <givenNames>N</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Coucke</familyName> <givenNames>W</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Teughels</familyName> <givenNames>W</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Quirynen</familyName> <givenNames>M</givenNames></author>. <articleTitle><fc>RCT</fc> comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3‐year follow‐up</articleTitle>. <journalTitle>J Clin Periodontol</journalTitle> <pubYear year="2012">2012</pubYear>;<vol>39</vol>:<pageFirst>1183</pageFirst>–<pageLast>1190</pageLast>. doi: <accessionId ref="info:doi/10.1111/jcpe.12017">10.1111/jcpe.12022</accessionId>.</citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPE.JCPE12022.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main"><fc>RCT</fc> comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3‐year follow‐up</title><title type="shortAuthors">Nicu et al.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#jcpe12022-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jcpe12022-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Elena A.</givenNames> <familyName>Nicu</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#jcpe12022-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jcpe12022-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Nele</givenNames> <familyNamePrefix>Van</familyNamePrefix><familyName>Assche</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#jcpe12022-aff-0003" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jcpe12022-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Wim</givenNames> <familyName>Coucke</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#jcpe12022-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jcpe12022-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>Wim</givenNames> <familyName>Teughels</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#jcpe12022-aff-0002" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jcpe12022-cr-0005"><personName><givenNames>Marc</givenNames> <familyName>Quirynen</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="NL" type="organization" xml:id="jcpe12022-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Periodontology</orgDiv> <orgName>Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam</orgName> <address><city>Amsterdam</city> <country>The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="BE" type="organization" xml:id="jcpe12022-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Department of Periodontology</orgDiv> <orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName> <address><city>Leuven</city> <country>Belgium</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="BE" type="organization" xml:id="jcpe12022-aff-0003"><orgDiv>Department of Clinical Biology</orgDiv> <orgName>Scientific Institute of Public Health</orgName> <address><city>Brussels</city> <country>Belgium</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0001">bone loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0002">clinical evaluation</keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0003">implant surface roughness</keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0004">microbiology</keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0005">osteoprotegerin</keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0006"><fc>RANKL</fc></keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0007">turned</keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12022-kwd-0008">TiUnite<sup>®</sup></keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="jcpe12022-abs-0001" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="jcpe12022-sec-0001"><title type="main">Aim</title><p>This 3‐year prospective randomized controlled trial compared the clinical, microbiological and biochemical outcome of minimally (Turned, Tur) and moderately rough (TiUnite<sup>®</sup>, TiU) implant surfaces in a split‐mouth design.</p></section><section xml:id="jcpe12022-sec-0002"><title type="main">Material and methods</title><p>The study population included 14 subjects: nine fully edentulous and five partially edentulous subjects with a history of periodontitis. Implants (<i>n</i> = 78, 39 Tur and 39 TiU) were installed randomly in each patient. Peri‐implant clinical parameters and intra‐oral radiographs were recorded after 3 years of loading. Subgingival plaque and peri‐implant crevicular fluid samples were collected and analysed using culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the biofilm, and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay for the concentration of osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa‐B ligand, respectively.</p></section><section xml:id="jcpe12022-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>No statistically significant differences in clinical, microbiological and biochemical parameters could be observed when comparing the Tur and TiU implant surfaces.</p></section><section xml:id="jcpe12022-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusion</title><p>After 3 years of loading, in periodontitis susceptible patients, the moderately rough, TiU implants demonstrated a similar clinical outcome compared with the smoother, turned implants. Longer follow‐up and studies using different implant types are needed to confirm the statement that minimally and moderately rough implant surfaces perform similar, both from a clinical and from a microbiological point of view.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup xml:id="jcpe12022-ntgp-0001"><note numbered="no" xml:id="jcpe12022-note-0001"><p><b>Conflict of interest and source of funding statement</b></p><p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This study was partially funded by Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden (grant # 2003‐144).</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3‐year follow‐up</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3‐year follow‐up</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Elena A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Nicu</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Nele</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Assche</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Wim</namePart><namePart type="family">Coucke</namePart><affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Wim</namePart><namePart type="family">Teughels</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marc</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>Address:E‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-12</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2012-10-01</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2012-09-16</dateValid><edition>Nicu EA, VanAssche N, Coucke W, Teughels W, Quirynen M. RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3‐year follow‐up. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39:1183–1190. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12022.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>This 3‐year prospective randomized controlled trial compared the clinical, microbiological and biochemical outcome of minimally (Turned, Tur) and moderately rough (TiUnite®, TiU) implant surfaces in a split‐mouth design.</abstract><abstract>The study population included 14 subjects: nine fully edentulous and five partially edentulous subjects with a history of periodontitis. Implants (n = 78, 39 Tur and 39 TiU) were installed randomly in each patient. Peri‐implant clinical parameters and intra‐oral radiographs were recorded after 3 years of loading. Subgingival plaque and peri‐implant crevicular fluid samples were collected and analysed using culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the biofilm, and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay for the concentration of osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa‐B ligand, respectively.</abstract><abstract>No statistically significant differences in clinical, microbiological and biochemical parameters could be observed when comparing the Tur and TiU implant surfaces.</abstract><abstract>After 3 years of loading, in periodontitis susceptible patients, the moderately rough, TiU implants demonstrated a similar clinical outcome compared with the smoother, turned implants. Longer follow‐up and studies using different implant types are needed to confirm the statement that minimally and moderately rough implant surfaces perform similar, both from a clinical and from a microbiological point of view.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone loss</topic><topic>clinical evaluation</topic><topic>implant surface roughness</topic><topic>microbiology</topic><topic>osteoprotegerin</topic><topic>RANKL</topic><topic>turned</topic><topic>TiUnite®</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>J Clin Periodontol</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Randomized Clinical Trial</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0303-6979</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPE</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>39</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>12</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1183</start><end>1190</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A267E167F28BA3789AA66CE600DD8D3AFDDAFEE4</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SPZDHP85-4</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/jcpe.12022</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCPE12022</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A267E167F28BA3789AA66CE600DD8D3AFDDAFEE4/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005132 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 005132 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A267E167F28BA3789AA66CE600DD8D3AFDDAFEE4
|texte= RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: A pilot study, a 3‐year follow‐up
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |