Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy
Identifieur interne : 004F38 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004F37; suivant : 004F39Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy
Auteurs : Marjolein Vercruyssen ; Margareta Hultin ; Nele Van Assche ; Krister Svensson ; Ignace Naert ; Marc QuirynenSource :
- Periodontology 2000 [ 0906-6713 ] ; 2014-10.
Abstract
Different computer‐assisted implant‐placement procedures are currently available. These differ in software, template manufacture, guiding device, stabilization and fixation. The literature seems to indicate that one has to accept a certain inaccuracy of ±2.0 mm, which seems large initially but is clearly smaller than for nonguided surgery. A reduction of accuracy to below 0.5 mm seems extremely difficult. A common shortcoming identified in the studies included in this review is inconsistency in how clinical data and outcome variables are reported. Another limitation is the small number of comparative clinical studies. In order to find the best guiding system or the most important parameters for optimal accuracy, more randomized clinical trials are necessary. Information on cost‐effectiveness and patient‐centered evaluations (i.e. questionnaires and interviews) must also be included.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/prd.12046
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9EE3CC6B0C800830719B39779F4B4EBCF762145ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy</title><author><name sortKey="Vercruyssen, Marjolein" sort="Vercruyssen, Marjolein" uniqKey="Vercruyssen M" first="Marjolein" last="Vercruyssen">Marjolein Vercruyssen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hultin, Margareta" sort="Hultin, Margareta" uniqKey="Hultin M" first="Margareta" last="Hultin">Margareta Hultin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, Nele" sort="Van Assche, Nele" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="Nele" last="Van Assche">Nele Van Assche</name></author><author><name sortKey="Svensson, Krister" sort="Svensson, Krister" uniqKey="Svensson K" first="Krister" last="Svensson">Krister Svensson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9EE3CC6B0C800830719B39779F4B4EBCF762145A</idno><date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/prd.12046</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9EE3CC6B0C800830719B39779F4B4EBCF762145A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004F38</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004F38</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy</title><author><name sortKey="Vercruyssen, Marjolein" sort="Vercruyssen, Marjolein" uniqKey="Vercruyssen M" first="Marjolein" last="Vercruyssen">Marjolein Vercruyssen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hultin, Margareta" sort="Hultin, Margareta" uniqKey="Hultin M" first="Margareta" last="Hultin">Margareta Hultin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, Nele" sort="Van Assche, Nele" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="Nele" last="Van Assche">Nele Van Assche</name></author><author><name sortKey="Svensson, Krister" sort="Svensson, Krister" uniqKey="Svensson K" first="Krister" last="Svensson">Krister Svensson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Periodontology 2000</title><title level="j" type="alt">PERIODONTOLOGY 2000</title><idno type="ISSN">0906-6713</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0757</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">66</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="228">228</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="246">246</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">19</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-10">2014-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0906-6713</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0906-6713</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Different computer‐assisted implant‐placement procedures are currently available. These differ in software, template manufacture, guiding device, stabilization and fixation. The literature seems to indicate that one has to accept a certain inaccuracy of ±2.0 mm, which seems large initially but is clearly smaller than for nonguided surgery. A reduction of accuracy to below 0.5 mm seems extremely difficult. A common shortcoming identified in the studies included in this review is inconsistency in how clinical data and outcome variables are reported. Another limitation is the small number of comparative clinical studies. In order to find the best guiding system or the most important parameters for optimal accuracy, more randomized clinical trials are necessary. Information on cost‐effectiveness and patient‐centered evaluations (i.e. questionnaires and interviews) must also be included.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Marjolein Vercruyssen</name></json:item><json:item><name>Margareta Hultin</name></json:item><json:item><name>Nele Van Assche</name></json:item><json:item><name>Krister Svensson</name></json:item><json:item><name>Ignace Naert</name></json:item><json:item><name>Marc Quirynen</name></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>PRD12046</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-26QWRXR6-Q</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Different computer‐assisted implant‐placement procedures are currently available. These differ in software, template manufacture, guiding device, stabilization and fixation. The literature seems to indicate that one has to accept a certain inaccuracy of ±2.0 mm, which seems large initially but is clearly smaller than for nonguided surgery. A reduction of accuracy to below 0.5 mm seems extremely difficult. A common shortcoming identified in the studies included in this review is inconsistency in how clinical data and outcome variables are reported. Another limitation is the small number of comparative clinical studies. In order to find the best guiding system or the most important parameters for optimal accuracy, more randomized clinical trials are necessary. Information on cost‐effectiveness and patient‐centered evaluations (i.e. questionnaires and interviews) must also be included.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.476</score><pdfWordCount>6982</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>50916</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>19</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>123</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>895</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Periodontology 2000</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0757</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0906-6713</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0757</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>PRD</json:string></publisherId><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>228</first><last>246</last><total>19</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-26QWRXR6-Q</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2014</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2014</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/prd.12046</json:string></doi><id>9EE3CC6B0C800830719B39779F4B4EBCF762145A</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9EE3CC6B0C800830719B39779F4B4EBCF762145A/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9EE3CC6B0C800830719B39779F4B4EBCF762145A/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/9EE3CC6B0C800830719B39779F4B4EBCF762145A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2014-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Marjolein</forename><surname>Vercruyssen</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Margareta</forename><surname>Hultin</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Nele</forename><surname>Van Assche</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Krister</forename><surname>Svensson</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Ignace</forename><surname>Naert</surname></persName></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Marc</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName></author><idno type="istex">9EE3CC6B0C800830719B39779F4B4EBCF762145A</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-26QWRXR6-Q</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/prd.12046</idno><idno type="unit">PRD12046</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:PRD.PRD12046.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Periodontology 2000</title><title level="j" type="alt">PERIODONTOLOGY 2000</title><idno type="pISSN">0906-6713</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0757</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0757</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/prd.2014.66.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">PRD</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">66</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="228">228</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="246">246</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">19</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="prd12046-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head><p>Different computer‐assisted implant‐placement procedures are currently available. These differ in software, template manufacture, guiding device, stabilization and fixation. The literature seems to indicate that one has to accept a certain inaccuracy of ±2.0 mm, which seems large initially but is clearly smaller than for nonguided surgery. A reduction of accuracy to below 0.5 mm seems extremely difficult. A common shortcoming identified in the studies included in this review is inconsistency in how clinical data and outcome variables are reported. Another limitation is the small number of comparative clinical studies. In order to find the best guiding system or the most important parameters for optimal accuracy, more randomized clinical trials are necessary. Information on cost‐effectiveness and patient‐centered evaluations (i.e. questionnaires and interviews) must also be included.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="prd12046" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0757</doi><issn type="print">0906-6713</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0757</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="PRD"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="PERIODONTOLOGY 2000" type="main">Periodontology 2000</title><title type="short">Periodontol 2000</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/prd.2014.66.issue-1</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="66" type="journalVolume">66</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2014-10">October 2014</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="140" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/prd.12046</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="PRD12046"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="19" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2013-06-12" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-12-10" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2014-08-14"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2014-08-14"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-07"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">228</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">246</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:PRD.PRD12046.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy</title><title type="shortAuthors">Vercruyssen et al.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="prd12046-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Marjolein</givenNames> <familyName>Vercruyssen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="prd12046-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Margareta</givenNames> <familyName>Hultin</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="prd12046-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Nele</givenNames> <familyName>Van Assche</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="prd12046-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>Krister</givenNames> <familyName>Svensson</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="prd12046-cr-0005"><personName><givenNames>Ignace</givenNames> <familyName>Naert</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="prd12046-cr-0006"><personName><givenNames>Marc</givenNames> <familyName>Quirynen</familyName></personName></creator></creators><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="prd12046-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>Different computer‐assisted implant‐placement procedures are currently available. These differ in software, template manufacture, guiding device, stabilization and fixation. The literature seems to indicate that one has to accept a certain inaccuracy of ±2.0 mm, which seems large initially but is clearly smaller than for nonguided surgery. A reduction of accuracy to below 0.5 mm seems extremely difficult. A common shortcoming identified in the studies included in this review is inconsistency in how clinical data and outcome variables are reported. Another limitation is the small number of comparative clinical studies. In order to find the best guiding system or the most important parameters for optimal accuracy, more randomized clinical trials are necessary. Information on cost‐effectiveness and patient‐centered evaluations (i.e. questionnaires and interviews) must also be included.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marjolein</namePart><namePart type="family">Vercruyssen</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Margareta</namePart><namePart type="family">Hultin</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Nele</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Assche</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Krister</namePart><namePart type="family">Svensson</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ignace</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marc</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2014-10</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-12-10</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2013-06-12</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>Different computer‐assisted implant‐placement procedures are currently available. These differ in software, template manufacture, guiding device, stabilization and fixation. The literature seems to indicate that one has to accept a certain inaccuracy of ±2.0 mm, which seems large initially but is clearly smaller than for nonguided surgery. A reduction of accuracy to below 0.5 mm seems extremely difficult. A common shortcoming identified in the studies included in this review is inconsistency in how clinical data and outcome variables are reported. Another limitation is the small number of comparative clinical studies. In order to find the best guiding system or the most important parameters for optimal accuracy, more randomized clinical trials are necessary. Information on cost‐effectiveness and patient‐centered evaluations (i.e. questionnaires and interviews) must also be included.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Periodontology 2000</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Periodontol 2000</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0906-6713</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0757</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0757</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">PRD</identifier><part><date>2014</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>66</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>228</start><end>246</end><total>19</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">9EE3CC6B0C800830719B39779F4B4EBCF762145A</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-26QWRXR6-Q</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/prd.12046</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">PRD12046</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9EE3CC6B0C800830719B39779F4B4EBCF762145A/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004F38 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004F38 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9EE3CC6B0C800830719B39779F4B4EBCF762145A
|texte= Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |