A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1‐year results from a randomized controlled trial
Identifieur interne : 004E69 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004E68; suivant : 004E70A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1‐year results from a randomized controlled trial
Auteurs : Wim Slot ; Gerry M. Raghoebar ; Arjan Vissink ; Henny J. A. MeijerSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2014-05.
Abstract
To compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6 bar‐connected implants in the posterior region of the maxilla to support an overdenture during a 1‐year follow‐up period.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12118
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9D26309F84640248C2EB4145BCE657E11D9F5325Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1‐year results from a randomized controlled trial</title><author><name sortKey="Slot, Wim" sort="Slot, Wim" uniqKey="Slot W" first="Wim" last="Slot">Wim Slot</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental SchoolUniversity Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196NL‐9700 AD GroningenThe NetherlandsTel.: +31‐(0)50‐3633092Fax: +31‐(0)50‐3632696e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: j.w.a.slot@umcg.nl</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9D26309F84640248C2EB4145BCE657E11D9F5325</idno><date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/clr.12118</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9D26309F84640248C2EB4145BCE657E11D9F5325/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004E69</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004E69</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1‐year results from a randomized controlled trial</title><author><name sortKey="Slot, Wim" sort="Slot, Wim" uniqKey="Slot W" first="Wim" last="Slot">Wim Slot</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental SchoolUniversity Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196NL‐9700 AD GroningenThe NetherlandsTel.: +31‐(0)50‐3633092Fax: +31‐(0)50‐3632696e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: j.w.a.slot@umcg.nl</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="560">560</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="566">566</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-05">2014-05</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">To compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6 bar‐connected implants in the posterior region of the maxilla to support an overdenture during a 1‐year follow‐up period.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Wim Slot</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string><json:string>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental SchoolUniversity Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196NL‐9700 AD GroningenThe NetherlandsTel.: +31‐(0)50‐3633092Fax: +31‐(0)50‐3632696e‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: j.w.a.slot@umcg.nl</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Arjan Vissink</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Henny J.A. Meijer</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>edentulous</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>maxilla</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>overdenture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>healthy ageing</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR12118</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-Q41405ML-V</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>To compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6 bar‐connected implants in the posterior region of the maxilla to support an overdenture during a 1‐year follow‐up period.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.312</score><pdfWordCount>5443</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>36171</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>26</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>165</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1‐year results from a randomized controlled trial</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>560</first><last>566</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-Q41405ML-V</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2014</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2014</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/clr.12118</json:string></doi><id>9D26309F84640248C2EB4145BCE657E11D9F5325</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9D26309F84640248C2EB4145BCE657E11D9F5325/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9D26309F84640248C2EB4145BCE657E11D9F5325/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/9D26309F84640248C2EB4145BCE657E11D9F5325/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1‐year results from a randomized controlled trial</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2014-05"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1‐year results from a randomized controlled trial</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Wim</forename><surname>Slot</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics</orgName><orgName>Dental School</orgName><orgName>University Medical Center Groningen</orgName><orgName>University of Groningen</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Groningen</settlement><country key="NL">The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author: Dr Wim Slot Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196 NL‐9700 AD Groningen The Netherlands Tel.: +31‐(0)50‐3633092 Fax: +31‐(0)50‐3632696 e‐mail: j.w.a.slot@umcg.nl</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Gerry M.</forename><surname>Raghoebar</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</orgName><orgName>University Medical Center Groningen</orgName><orgName>University of Groningen</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Groningen</settlement><country key="NL">The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Arjan</forename><surname>Vissink</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</orgName><orgName>University Medical Center Groningen</orgName><orgName>University of Groningen</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Groningen</settlement><country key="NL">The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Henny J.A.</forename><surname>Meijer</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics</orgName><orgName>Dental School</orgName><orgName>University Medical Center Groningen</orgName><orgName>University of Groningen</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Groningen</settlement><country key="NL">The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation><affiliation><orgName>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</orgName><orgName>University Medical Center Groningen</orgName><orgName>University of Groningen</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Groningen</settlement><country key="NL">The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">9D26309F84640248C2EB4145BCE657E11D9F5325</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-Q41405ML-V</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/clr.12118</idno><idno type="unit">CLR12118</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR12118.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2014.25.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="560">560</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="566">566</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-05"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main" xml:id="clr12118-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Objective
<p>To compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6 bar‐connected implants in the posterior region of the maxilla to support an overdenture during a 1‐year follow‐up period.</p>
Materials and methods
<p>Sixty‐six edentulous patients with an insufficient amount of bone volume in the maxilla to place implants were asked to participate in this study. Randomization assigned patients to either 4 or 6 implants. In all patients, a maxillary sinus floor elevation procedure with bone from the iliac crest was performed, and after a 3‐month healing period, 4 or 6 dental implants were inserted in the maxillary posterior region in a one‐stage procedure. After 3 months of osseointegration, a bar‐supported overdenture was constructed. Implant survival, overdenture survival, clinical scores, peri‐implant bone height changes and patients' satisfaction were assessed. Study analysis was performed according a non‐inferiority design.</p>
Results
<p>All patients completed the one‐year follow‐up. After a functional period of 1‐year, implant survival was 100% in the 4 implants group and 99.5% in the 6 implants group. Overdenture survival was 100% in both groups. Mean clinical scores were very low and did not significantly differ between groups. Mean marginal bone resorption was 0.35 ± 0.31 mm and 0.46 ± 0.34 mm in the 4 and 6 implants group, respectively. Patients' satisfaction improved significantly in both groups, but did not differ between groups.</p>
Conclusion
<p>A bar‐supported overdenture on 4 implants in the posterior maxillary region is not inferior to an overdenture supported by 6 bar‐connected dental implants.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="clr12118-kwd-0001">edentulous</term><term xml:id="clr12118-kwd-0002">maxilla</term><term xml:id="clr12118-kwd-0003">dental implants</term><term xml:id="clr12118-kwd-0004">overdenture</term><term xml:id="clr12118-kwd-0005">healthy ageing</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="clr12118" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title type="short">Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="50"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2014.25.issue-5</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="25">25</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2014-05">May 2014</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="40" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/clr.12118</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR12118"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="7" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2012-12-22" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-01-22" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.3.0 mode:FullText" date="2014-04-11"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2013-02-13"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-02-13"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2014-04-11"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-08"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">560</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">566</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line><b>Corresponding author:</b></line><line><i>Dr Wim Slot</i></line><line>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School</line><line>University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196</line><line>NL‐9700 AD Groningen</line><line>The Netherlands</line><line>Tel.: +31‐(0)50‐3633092</line><line>Fax: +31‐(0)50‐3632696</line><line>e‐mail: <email>j.w.a.slot@umcg.nl</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="clr12118-cit-1001"><author><familyName>Slot</familyName> <givenNames>W</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Raghoebar</familyName> <givenNames>GM</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Vissink</familyName> <givenNames>A</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Meijer</familyName> <givenNames>HJA</givenNames></author>. <articleTitle>A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1‐year results from a randomized controlled trial</articleTitle>. <journalTitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</journalTitle> <vol>25</vol>, <pubYear year="2014">2014</pubYear>, <pageFirst>560</pageFirst>–<pageLast>566</pageLast>.</citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR12118.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1‐year results from a randomized controlled trial</title><title type="shortAuthors">Slot et al</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#clr12118-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12118-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Wim</givenNames> <familyName>Slot</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr12118-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12118-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Gerry M.</givenNames> <familyName>Raghoebar</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr12118-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12118-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Arjan</givenNames> <familyName>Vissink</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr12118-aff-0001 #clr12118-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12118-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>Henny J.A.</givenNames> <familyName>Meijer</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="NL" type="organization" xml:id="clr12118-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics</orgDiv> <orgName>Dental School</orgName> <orgName>University Medical Center Groningen</orgName> <orgName>University of Groningen</orgName> <address><city>Groningen</city> <country>The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="NL" type="organization" xml:id="clr12118-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</orgDiv> <orgName>University Medical Center Groningen</orgName> <orgName>University of Groningen</orgName> <address><city>Groningen</city> <country>The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="clr12118-kwd-0001">edentulous</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12118-kwd-0002">maxilla</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12118-kwd-0003">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12118-kwd-0004">overdenture</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12118-kwd-0005">healthy ageing</keyword></keywordGroup><supportingInformation><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting" mimeType="application/msword" href="urn-x:wiley:09057161:media:clr12118:clr12118-sup-0001-DataS1"></mediaResource><caption><b>Data S1.</b> CONSORT Statement 2001 Checklist. </caption></supportingInfoItem></supportingInformation><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="clr12118-abs-0001" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="clr12118-sec-0001"><title type="main">Objective</title><p>To compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6 bar‐connected implants in the posterior region of the maxilla to support an overdenture during a 1‐year follow‐up period.</p></section><section xml:id="clr12118-sec-0002"><title type="main">Materials and methods</title><p>Sixty‐six edentulous patients with an insufficient amount of bone volume in the maxilla to place implants were asked to participate in this study. Randomization assigned patients to either 4 or 6 implants. In all patients, a maxillary sinus floor elevation procedure with bone from the iliac crest was performed, and after a 3‐month healing period, 4 or 6 dental implants were inserted in the maxillary posterior region in a one‐stage procedure. After 3 months of osseointegration, a bar‐supported overdenture was constructed. Implant survival, overdenture survival, clinical scores, peri‐implant bone height changes and patients' satisfaction were assessed. Study analysis was performed according a non‐inferiority design.</p></section><section xml:id="clr12118-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>All patients completed the one‐year follow‐up. After a functional period of 1‐year, implant survival was 100% in the 4 implants group and 99.5% in the 6 implants group. Overdenture survival was 100% in both groups. Mean clinical scores were very low and did not significantly differ between groups. Mean marginal bone resorption was 0.35 ± 0.31 mm and 0.46 ± 0.34 mm in the 4 and 6 implants group, respectively. Patients' satisfaction improved significantly in both groups, but did not differ between groups.</p></section><section xml:id="clr12118-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusion</title><p>A bar‐supported overdenture on 4 implants in the posterior maxillary region is not inferior to an overdenture supported by 6 bar‐connected dental implants.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1‐year results from a randomized controlled trial</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1‐year results from a randomized controlled trial</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Wim</namePart><namePart type="family">Slot</namePart><affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental SchoolUniversity Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196NL‐9700 AD GroningenThe NetherlandsTel.: +31‐(0)50‐3633092Fax: +31‐(0)50‐3632696e‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: j.w.a.slot@umcg.nl</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gerry M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Raghoebar</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Arjan</namePart><namePart type="family">Vissink</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Henny J.A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Meijer</namePart><affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2014-05</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-01-22</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2012-12-22</dateValid><edition>Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJA. A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1‐year results from a randomized controlled trial. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 25, 2014, 560–566.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>To compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6 bar‐connected implants in the posterior region of the maxilla to support an overdenture during a 1‐year follow‐up period.</abstract><abstract>Sixty‐six edentulous patients with an insufficient amount of bone volume in the maxilla to place implants were asked to participate in this study. Randomization assigned patients to either 4 or 6 implants. In all patients, a maxillary sinus floor elevation procedure with bone from the iliac crest was performed, and after a 3‐month healing period, 4 or 6 dental implants were inserted in the maxillary posterior region in a one‐stage procedure. After 3 months of osseointegration, a bar‐supported overdenture was constructed. Implant survival, overdenture survival, clinical scores, peri‐implant bone height changes and patients' satisfaction were assessed. Study analysis was performed according a non‐inferiority design.</abstract><abstract>All patients completed the one‐year follow‐up. After a functional period of 1‐year, implant survival was 100% in the 4 implants group and 99.5% in the 6 implants group. Overdenture survival was 100% in both groups. Mean clinical scores were very low and did not significantly differ between groups. Mean marginal bone resorption was 0.35 ± 0.31 mm and 0.46 ± 0.34 mm in the 4 and 6 implants group, respectively. Patients' satisfaction improved significantly in both groups, but did not differ between groups.</abstract><abstract>A bar‐supported overdenture on 4 implants in the posterior maxillary region is not inferior to an overdenture supported by 6 bar‐connected dental implants.</abstract><note type="additional physical form">Data S1. CONSORT Statement 2001 Checklist.</note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>edentulous</topic><topic>maxilla</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>overdenture</topic><topic>healthy ageing</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2014</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>25</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>560</start><end>566</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">9D26309F84640248C2EB4145BCE657E11D9F5325</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-Q41405ML-V</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/clr.12118</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR12118</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9D26309F84640248C2EB4145BCE657E11D9F5325/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004E69 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004E69 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9D26309F84640248C2EB4145BCE657E11D9F5325
|texte= A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1‐year results from a randomized controlled trial
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |