A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems
Identifieur interne : 004C31 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004C30; suivant : 004C32A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems
Auteurs : Reinhilde Jacobs ; Pisha Pittayapat ; Daniel Van Steenberghe ; Greet De Mars ; Frieda Gijbels ; Annelies Van Der Donck ; Limin Li ; Xin Liang ; Nele Van Assche ; Marc Quirynen ; Ignace NaertSource :
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 2010-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Astra, Astra tech, Astra techs, Astra techs implants, Bone density, Bone density measurements, Bone level, Bone loss, Branemark, Branemark mark, Branemarks, Branemarks implants, Branemarks system, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Dentistry, Different surface characteristics, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, Edentulous mandibles, Edentulous patients, Fpdps, Implant, Implant design, Implant installation, Implant lengths, Implant level, Implant placement, Implant systems, Implant types, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, John wiley sons implant, Leuven, Mandible, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Nobel biocare, Oral implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Pairs test, Partial dentures, Periodontal, Periodontology, Present study, Previous studies, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic parameters, Randomized, Randomized design, Reference level, Screw access holes, Simple regression analysis, Steenberghe, Surface characteristics, Systematic review, Systemic factors, Titanium, Titanium implants.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Astra, Astra tech, Astra techs, Astra techs implants, Bone density, Bone density measurements, Bone level, Bone loss, Branemark, Branemark mark, Branemarks, Branemarks implants, Branemarks system, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Dentistry, Different surface characteristics, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, Edentulous mandibles, Edentulous patients, Fpdps, Implant, Implant design, Implant installation, Implant lengths, Implant level, Implant placement, Implant systems, Implant types, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, John wiley sons implant, Leuven, Mandible, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Nobel biocare, Oral implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Pairs test, Partial dentures, Periodontal, Periodontology, Present study, Previous studies, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic parameters, Randomized, Randomized design, Reference level, Screw access holes, Simple regression analysis, Steenberghe, Surface characteristics, Systematic review, Systemic factors, Titanium, Titanium implants.
Abstract
Jacobs R, Pittayapat P, van Steenberghe D, De Mars G, Gijbels F, Van Der Donck A, Li L, Liang X, Van Assche N, Quirynen M, Naert I. A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems. J Clin Periodontol 2010; doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01626.x.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01626.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:98D1491D9A4B16229E88AA279B05BF86607D2CA9Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems</title><author><name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pittayapat, Pisha" sort="Pittayapat, Pisha" uniqKey="Pittayapat P" first="Pisha" last="Pittayapat">Pisha Pittayapat</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, Daniel" sort="Van Steenberghe, Daniel" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="Daniel" last="Van Steenberghe">Daniel Van Steenberghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Mars, Greet" sort="De Mars, Greet" uniqKey="De Mars G" first="Greet" last="De Mars">Greet De Mars</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gijbels, Frieda" sort="Gijbels, Frieda" uniqKey="Gijbels F" first="Frieda" last="Gijbels">Frieda Gijbels</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Der Donck, Annelies" sort="Van Der Donck, Annelies" uniqKey="Van Der Donck A" first="Annelies" last="Van Der Donck">Annelies Van Der Donck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Li, Limin" sort="Li, Limin" uniqKey="Li L" first="Limin" last="Li">Limin Li</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Liang, Xin" sort="Liang, Xin" uniqKey="Liang X" first="Xin" last="Liang">Xin Liang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, Nele" sort="Van Assche, Nele" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="Nele" last="Van Assche">Nele Van Assche</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:98D1491D9A4B16229E88AA279B05BF86607D2CA9</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01626.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/98D1491D9A4B16229E88AA279B05BF86607D2CA9/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004C31</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004C31</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems</title><author><name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pittayapat, Pisha" sort="Pittayapat, Pisha" uniqKey="Pittayapat P" first="Pisha" last="Pittayapat">Pisha Pittayapat</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, Daniel" sort="Van Steenberghe, Daniel" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="Daniel" last="Van Steenberghe">Daniel Van Steenberghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Mars, Greet" sort="De Mars, Greet" uniqKey="De Mars G" first="Greet" last="De Mars">Greet De Mars</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gijbels, Frieda" sort="Gijbels, Frieda" uniqKey="Gijbels F" first="Frieda" last="Gijbels">Frieda Gijbels</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Der Donck, Annelies" sort="Van Der Donck, Annelies" uniqKey="Van Der Donck A" first="Annelies" last="Van Der Donck">Annelies Van Der Donck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Li, Limin" sort="Li, Limin" uniqKey="Li L" first="Limin" last="Li">Limin Li</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Liang, Xin" sort="Liang, Xin" uniqKey="Liang X" first="Xin" last="Liang">Xin Liang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, Nele" sort="Van Assche, Nele" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="Nele" last="Van Assche">Nele Van Assche</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">37</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1119">1119</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1127">1127</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-12">2010-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Astra techs</term><term>Astra techs implants</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone density measurements</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark mark</term><term>Branemarks</term><term>Branemarks implants</term><term>Branemarks system</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different surface characteristics</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>Edentulous mandibles</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Fpdps</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant lengths</term><term>Implant level</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implant types</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons implant</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Pairs test</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Present study</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic parameters</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Randomized design</term><term>Reference level</term><term>Screw access holes</term><term>Simple regression analysis</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Surface characteristics</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Systemic factors</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Astra techs</term><term>Astra techs implants</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone density measurements</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark mark</term><term>Branemarks</term><term>Branemarks implants</term><term>Branemarks system</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different surface characteristics</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>Edentulous mandibles</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Fpdps</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant lengths</term><term>Implant level</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implant types</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons implant</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Pairs test</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Present study</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic parameters</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Randomized design</term><term>Reference level</term><term>Screw access holes</term><term>Simple regression analysis</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Surface characteristics</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Systemic factors</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Jacobs R, Pittayapat P, van Steenberghe D, De Mars G, Gijbels F, Van Der Donck A, Li L, Liang X, Van Assche N, Quirynen M, Naert I. A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems. J Clin Periodontol 2010; doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01626.x.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>branemarks</json:string><json:string>implant systems</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>steenberghe</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>bone density</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>astra</json:string><json:string>astra techs</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>randomized</json:string><json:string>quirynen</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>fpdps</json:string><json:string>astra techs implants</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>leuven</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>branemarks implants</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>oral implants</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>astra tech</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>branemarks system</json:string><json:string>bone density measurements</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>implant installation</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>simple regression analysis</json:string><json:string>pairs test</json:string><json:string>radiographic parameters</json:string><json:string>implant level</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>reference level</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons implant</json:string><json:string>implant lengths</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>branemark mark</json:string><json:string>implant design</json:string><json:string>previous studies</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>screw access holes</json:string><json:string>edentulous jaws</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandibles</json:string><json:string>surface characteristics</json:string><json:string>implant types</json:string><json:string>systemic factors</json:string><json:string>different surface characteristics</json:string><json:string>randomized design</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Reinhilde Jacobs</name><affiliations><json:string>Oral Imaging Center</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Pisha Pittayapat</name><affiliations><json:string>Oral Imaging Center</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Daniel Van Steenberghe</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Greet De Mars</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Frieda Gijbels</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Annelies Van Der Donck</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Limin Li</name><affiliations><json:string>Oral Imaging Center</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Xin Liang</name><affiliations><json:string>Oral Imaging Center</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Nele Van Assche</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marc Quirynen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ignace Naert</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone remodelling</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant systems</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>marginal bone level</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osseointegration</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>split‐mouth design</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JCPE1626</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-8HWG4KP3-6</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Jacobs R, Pittayapat P, van Steenberghe D, De Mars G, Gijbels F, Van Der Donck A, Li L, Liang X, Van Assche N, Quirynen M, Naert I. A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems. J Clin Periodontol 2010; doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01626.x.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.564</score><pdfWordCount>5783</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>38120</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>47</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>288</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems</title><pmid><json:string>20874829</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0303-6979</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-051X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JCPE</json:string></publisherId><volume>37</volume><issue>12</issue><pages><first>1119</first><last>1127</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1236s</json:string><json:string>1</json:string><json:string>1000s</json:string><json:string>10</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string><json:string>1980</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Periodontology</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Jacobs R, Pittayapat P</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Frieda Gijbels</json:string><json:string>Van Der</json:string><json:string>Marc Quirynen</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Xin Liang</json:string><json:string>Van Assche</json:string><json:string>In</json:string><json:string>Ignace Naert</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Finland</json:string><json:string>San Jose</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>CA</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Bragger et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Astrand et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Bragger et al. (1996)</json:string><json:string>van Steenberghe et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>van Steenberghe et al. (2000)</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Barone et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Heckmann et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Rasmusson et al.</json:string><json:string>Roberts 1988</json:string><json:string>Schincaglia et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Branemark et al. (1969)</json:string><json:string>Adell et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Karlsson (2001)</json:string><json:string>Jacobs et al.</json:string><json:string>Eliasson et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Berglundh et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Lekholm et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Arvidson et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Alsaadi et al. 2006, 2007, 2008a, b</json:string><json:string>Heckmann et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Van de Velde et al. (2009)</json:string><json:string>Rasmusson et al. (2005)</json:string><json:string>Renvert et al. (2008)</json:string><json:string>Tricio et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Nackaerts et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Schincaglia et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Astrand et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Wennerberg & Albrektsson 2009</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Muhlemann & Son 1971</json:string><json:string>Appleton et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Gotfredsen et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Renvert et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Roberts et al. (1987)</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Pjetursson et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Appleton et al. (2005)</json:string><json:string>Van de Velde et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Branemark et al. (1985)</json:string><json:string>Misch 1999</json:string><json:string>Røynesdal et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Quirynen & Listgarten 1990</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-8HWG4KP3-6</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01626.x</json:string></doi><id>98D1491D9A4B16229E88AA279B05BF86607D2CA9</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/98D1491D9A4B16229E88AA279B05BF86607D2CA9/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/98D1491D9A4B16229E88AA279B05BF86607D2CA9/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/98D1491D9A4B16229E88AA279B05BF86607D2CA9/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems</title><title level="a" type="short">16‐year split‐mouth implant follow‐up</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Reinhilde</forename><surname>Jacobs</surname></persName><affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Periodontology</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Pisha</forename><surname>Pittayapat</surname></persName><affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Daniel</forename><surname>Van Steenberghe</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Greet</forename><surname>De Mars</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Frieda</forename><surname>Gijbels</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Annelies</forename><surname>Van Der Donck</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0006"><persName><forename type="first">Limin</forename><surname>Li</surname></persName><affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0007"><persName><forename type="first">Xin</forename><surname>Liang</surname></persName><affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0008"><persName><forename type="first">Nele</forename><surname>Van Assche</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0009"><persName><forename type="first">Marc</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0010"><persName><forename type="first">Ignace</forename><surname>Naert</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">98D1491D9A4B16229E88AA279B05BF86607D2CA9</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-8HWG4KP3-6</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01626.x</idno><idno type="unit">JCPE1626</idno><idno type="supplier">1626</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JCPE.JCPE1626.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cpe.2010.37.issue-12</idno><idno type="product">JCPE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">37</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1119">1119</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1127">1127</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>Jacobs R, Pittayapat P, van Steenberghe D, De Mars G, Gijbels F, Van Der Donck A, Li L, Liang X, Van Assche N, Quirynen M, Naert I. A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems. J Clin Periodontol 2010; doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01626.x.</p>
Abstract
<p><hi rend="bold">Introduction: </hi> Many studies have dealt with the clinical outcome of oral implants, yet none applied a randomized split‐mouth design for a long‐term follow‐up of similar implant systems.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Aim: </hi> To evaluate two oral implant systems with different surface characteristics in a randomized split‐mouth design and to radiologically analyse peri‐implant bone level and density over an up to 16‐year period.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods: </hi> The study comprised clinical and radiographic records of 18 partially edentulous patients treated with both implant types randomly placed in either left or right jaw sides. Outcome was evaluated over time.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> Clinical and radiographic parameters showed no significant differences over time for both systems. Ten years after implant placement, a significantly increasing peri‐implant bone density was noted, while Periotest values were found to be significantly decreasing. Fifteen years after implant loading, mean bone loss was 0.02 mm (range −1.15 to 1.51; SD 0.45) for Astra Tech<hi rend="superscript">®</hi> implants (<hi rend="italic">n</hi>=24) and 0.31 mm (range −0.98 to 2.31; SD 0.69) for Brånemark<hi rend="superscript">®</hi> implants (<hi rend="italic">n</hi>=23).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> The study failed to demonstrate significant differences in the outcome of the peri‐implant bone for two implant systems with different surface characteristics. The marginal bone level around oral implants changed <0.5 mm after 15 years of loading.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bone remodelling</term><term xml:id="k2">implant systems</term><term xml:id="k3">marginal bone level</term><term xml:id="k4">osseointegration</term><term xml:id="k5">split‐mouth design</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Implant Therapy</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/98D1491D9A4B16229E88AA279B05BF86607D2CA9/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</doi><issn type="print">0303-6979</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-051X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12112"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cpe.2010.37.issue-12</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="37">37</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="12">12</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-12">December 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="9" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01626.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCPE1626"></id><id type="supplier" value="1626"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Implant Therapy</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.26 mode:FullText" date="2010-11-11"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-09-28"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-09-28"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-11-11"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-24"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1119">1119</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="1127">1127</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Address:
<i>Reinhilde Jacobs</i>
<i>Oral Imaging Center</i>
<i>Faculty of Medicine</i>
<i>KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer</i>
<i>7, 3000 Leuven</i>
<i>Belgium</i>
E‐mail: <email normalForm="reinhilde.jacobs@med.kuleuven.be">reinhilde.jacobs@med.kuleuven.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPE.JCPE1626.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 24 August 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="7"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="5"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="44"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="8110"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="63"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems</title><title type="shortAuthors">Jacobs et al.</title><title type="short">16‐year split‐mouth implant follow‐up</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2"><personName><givenNames>Reinhilde</givenNames><familyName>Jacobs</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Pisha</givenNames><familyName>Pittayapat</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Daniel</givenNames><familyName>Van Steenberghe</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Greet</givenNames><familyName>De Mars</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Frieda</givenNames><familyName>Gijbels</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Annelies</givenNames><familyName>Van Der Donck</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr7" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Limin</givenNames><familyName>Li</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr8" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Xin</givenNames><familyName>Liang</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr9" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Nele</givenNames><familyName>Van Assche</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr10" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Marc</givenNames><familyName>Quirynen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr11" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Ignace</givenNames><familyName>Naert</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Oral Imaging Center</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bone remodelling</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implant systems</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">marginal bone level</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">osseointegration</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">split‐mouth design</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><section xml:id="sec-sum-1"><p>Jacobs R, Pittayapat P, van Steenberghe D, De Mars G, Gijbels F, Van Der Donck A, Li L, Liang X, Van Assche N, Quirynen M, Naert I. A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems. J Clin Periodontol 2010; doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01626.x.</p></section><section xml:id="abs1-1"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Introduction: </b> Many studies have dealt with the clinical outcome of oral implants, yet none applied a randomized split‐mouth design for a long‐term follow‐up of similar implant systems.</p><p><b>Aim: </b> To evaluate two oral implant systems with different surface characteristics in a randomized split‐mouth design and to radiologically analyse peri‐implant bone level and density over an up to 16‐year period.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods: </b> The study comprised clinical and radiographic records of 18 partially edentulous patients treated with both implant types randomly placed in either left or right jaw sides. Outcome was evaluated over time.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Clinical and radiographic parameters showed no significant differences over time for both systems. Ten years after implant placement, a significantly increasing peri‐implant bone density was noted, while Periotest values were found to be significantly decreasing. Fifteen years after implant loading, mean bone loss was 0.02 mm (range −1.15 to 1.51; SD 0.45) for Astra Tech<sup>®</sup> implants (<i>n</i>=24) and 0.31 mm (range −0.98 to 2.31; SD 0.69) for Brånemark<sup>®</sup> implants (<i>n</i>=23).</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> The study failed to demonstrate significant differences in the outcome of the peri‐implant bone for two implant systems with different surface characteristics. The marginal bone level around oral implants changed <0.5 mm after 15 years of loading.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1"><p><b>Conflict of interest and source of funding statement</b>
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests. While the initial 2‐year follow‐up study was supported (see <link href="#b42">van Steenberghe et al. 2000</link>), there was no further financial support for this continued follow‐up study until 16 years after implant placement.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>16‐year split‐mouth implant follow‐up</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Reinhilde</namePart><namePart type="family">Jacobs</namePart><affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Periodontology</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Pisha</namePart><namePart type="family">Pittayapat</namePart><affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniel</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Steenberghe</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Greet</namePart><namePart type="family">De Mars</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Frieda</namePart><namePart type="family">Gijbels</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Annelies</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Der Donck</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Limin</namePart><namePart type="family">Li</namePart><affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Xin</namePart><namePart type="family">Liang</namePart><affiliation>Oral Imaging Center</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Nele</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Assche</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marc</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ignace</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-12</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 24 August 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">7</extent><extent unit="tables">5</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">44</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">63</extent><extent unit="words">8110</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Jacobs R, Pittayapat P, van Steenberghe D, De Mars G, Gijbels F, Van Der Donck A, Li L, Liang X, Van Assche N, Quirynen M, Naert I. A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems. J Clin Periodontol 2010; doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01626.x.</abstract><abstract>Introduction: Many studies have dealt with the clinical outcome of oral implants, yet none applied a randomized split‐mouth design for a long‐term follow‐up of similar implant systems. Aim: To evaluate two oral implant systems with different surface characteristics in a randomized split‐mouth design and to radiologically analyse peri‐implant bone level and density over an up to 16‐year period. Materials and Methods: The study comprised clinical and radiographic records of 18 partially edentulous patients treated with both implant types randomly placed in either left or right jaw sides. Outcome was evaluated over time. Results: Clinical and radiographic parameters showed no significant differences over time for both systems. Ten years after implant placement, a significantly increasing peri‐implant bone density was noted, while Periotest values were found to be significantly decreasing. Fifteen years after implant loading, mean bone loss was 0.02 mm (range −1.15 to 1.51; SD 0.45) for Astra Tech® implants (n=24) and 0.31 mm (range −0.98 to 2.31; SD 0.69) for Brånemark® implants (n=23). Conclusions: The study failed to demonstrate significant differences in the outcome of the peri‐implant bone for two implant systems with different surface characteristics. The marginal bone level around oral implants changed <0.5 mm after 15 years of loading.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone remodelling</topic><topic>implant systems</topic><topic>marginal bone level</topic><topic>osseointegration</topic><topic>split‐mouth design</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0303-6979</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPE</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>37</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>12</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1119</start><end>1127</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">98D1491D9A4B16229E88AA279B05BF86607D2CA9</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-8HWG4KP3-6</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01626.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCPE1626</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/98D1491D9A4B16229E88AA279B05BF86607D2CA9/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004C31 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004C31 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:98D1491D9A4B16229E88AA279B05BF86607D2CA9
|texte= A split‐mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw‐shaped titanium implant systems
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |