Prisoners' Rights since the Woolf Report: Progress or Procrastination?
Identifieur interne : 004B47 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004B46; suivant : 004B48Prisoners' Rights since the Woolf Report: Progress or Procrastination?
Auteurs : Dennis EadySource :
- The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice [ 0265-5527 ] ; 2007-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Annual report london, Austere regimes, Author journal compilation, Basic regime, Board members, Chief inspector, David ramsbotham, Degrading treatment, Domestic courts, Early release, Echr, European committee, European convention, European court, Former prison governor, Fundamental right, Government policy, Home department, Home secretary, Howard journal, Howard league, Human rights, Independent monitoring boards, Issn, July, Last decade, Legal action, Livingstone, Monitoring bodies, National council, Ombudsman, Other prisons, Penal reform, Policy terms, Political agenda, Prison authorities, Prison reform trust, Prison rules, Prison service, Prison service journal, Prison staff, Prisoner, Probation journal, Probation ombudsman, Purposeful activity, Ramsbotham, Rights culture, Special cells, Statutory power, Supervision centre, Visionary change, Woolf, Woolf report.
- Teeft :
- Annual report london, Austere regimes, Author journal compilation, Basic regime, Board members, Chief inspector, David ramsbotham, Degrading treatment, Domestic courts, Early release, Echr, European committee, European convention, European court, Former prison governor, Fundamental right, Government policy, Home department, Home secretary, Howard journal, Howard league, Human rights, Independent monitoring boards, Issn, July, Last decade, Legal action, Livingstone, Monitoring bodies, National council, Ombudsman, Other prisons, Penal reform, Policy terms, Political agenda, Prison authorities, Prison reform trust, Prison rules, Prison service, Prison service journal, Prison staff, Prisoner, Probation journal, Probation ombudsman, Purposeful activity, Ramsbotham, Rights culture, Special cells, Statutory power, Supervision centre, Visionary change, Woolf, Woolf report.
Abstract
Abstract: The recommendations of the Woolf Report (Woolf and Tumin 1991) promoted the principles of justice and fairness in the running of prisons in England and Wales. This article examines how far a rights culture has developed in prisons since Woolf. This is done with reference to human rights legislation, the role of monitoring bodies and government policy and practice in relation to prisoners' rights and conditions. The article concludes that while some progress has been made through the courts and through pressure from monitoring bodies, government policy and practice has frequently resisted rather than promoted the development of a rights‐based culture.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00473.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:972B9F31BF2521217E5670A4C831CDC72DA016B7Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Prisoners' Rights since the Woolf Report: Progress or Procrastination?</title><author><name sortKey="Eady, Dennis" sort="Eady, Dennis" uniqKey="Eady D" first="Dennis" last="Eady">Dennis Eady</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>PhD Student, Cardiff University</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:972B9F31BF2521217E5670A4C831CDC72DA016B7</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00473.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/972B9F31BF2521217E5670A4C831CDC72DA016B7/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004B47</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004B47</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Prisoners' Rights since the Woolf Report: Progress or Procrastination?</title><author><name sortKey="Eady, Dennis" sort="Eady, Dennis" uniqKey="Eady D" first="Dennis" last="Eady">Dennis Eady</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>PhD Student, Cardiff University</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice</title><title level="j" type="alt">HOWARD JOURNAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE</title><idno type="ISSN">0265-5527</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2311</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">46</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="264">264</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="275">275</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-07">2007-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0265-5527</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0265-5527</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Annual report london</term><term>Austere regimes</term><term>Author journal compilation</term><term>Basic regime</term><term>Board members</term><term>Chief inspector</term><term>David ramsbotham</term><term>Degrading treatment</term><term>Domestic courts</term><term>Early release</term><term>Echr</term><term>European committee</term><term>European convention</term><term>European court</term><term>Former prison governor</term><term>Fundamental right</term><term>Government policy</term><term>Home department</term><term>Home secretary</term><term>Howard journal</term><term>Howard league</term><term>Human rights</term><term>Independent monitoring boards</term><term>Issn</term><term>July</term><term>Last decade</term><term>Legal action</term><term>Livingstone</term><term>Monitoring bodies</term><term>National council</term><term>Ombudsman</term><term>Other prisons</term><term>Penal reform</term><term>Policy terms</term><term>Political agenda</term><term>Prison authorities</term><term>Prison reform trust</term><term>Prison rules</term><term>Prison service</term><term>Prison service journal</term><term>Prison staff</term><term>Prisoner</term><term>Probation journal</term><term>Probation ombudsman</term><term>Purposeful activity</term><term>Ramsbotham</term><term>Rights culture</term><term>Special cells</term><term>Statutory power</term><term>Supervision centre</term><term>Visionary change</term><term>Woolf</term><term>Woolf report</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Annual report london</term><term>Austere regimes</term><term>Author journal compilation</term><term>Basic regime</term><term>Board members</term><term>Chief inspector</term><term>David ramsbotham</term><term>Degrading treatment</term><term>Domestic courts</term><term>Early release</term><term>Echr</term><term>European committee</term><term>European convention</term><term>European court</term><term>Former prison governor</term><term>Fundamental right</term><term>Government policy</term><term>Home department</term><term>Home secretary</term><term>Howard journal</term><term>Howard league</term><term>Human rights</term><term>Independent monitoring boards</term><term>Issn</term><term>July</term><term>Last decade</term><term>Legal action</term><term>Livingstone</term><term>Monitoring bodies</term><term>National council</term><term>Ombudsman</term><term>Other prisons</term><term>Penal reform</term><term>Policy terms</term><term>Political agenda</term><term>Prison authorities</term><term>Prison reform trust</term><term>Prison rules</term><term>Prison service</term><term>Prison service journal</term><term>Prison staff</term><term>Prisoner</term><term>Probation journal</term><term>Probation ombudsman</term><term>Purposeful activity</term><term>Ramsbotham</term><term>Rights culture</term><term>Special cells</term><term>Statutory power</term><term>Supervision centre</term><term>Visionary change</term><term>Woolf</term><term>Woolf report</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: The recommendations of the Woolf Report (Woolf and Tumin 1991) promoted the principles of justice and fairness in the running of prisons in England and Wales. This article examines how far a rights culture has developed in prisons since Woolf. This is done with reference to human rights legislation, the role of monitoring bodies and government policy and practice in relation to prisoners' rights and conditions. The article concludes that while some progress has been made through the courts and through pressure from monitoring bodies, government policy and practice has frequently resisted rather than promoted the development of a rights‐based culture.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>human rights</json:string><json:string>echr</json:string><json:string>woolf</json:string><json:string>howard league</json:string><json:string>july</json:string><json:string>issn</json:string><json:string>author journal compilation</json:string><json:string>howard journal</json:string><json:string>prison service</json:string><json:string>ramsbotham</json:string><json:string>ombudsman</json:string><json:string>prison rules</json:string><json:string>livingstone</json:string><json:string>woolf report</json:string><json:string>last decade</json:string><json:string>prison service journal</json:string><json:string>prison reform trust</json:string><json:string>monitoring bodies</json:string><json:string>european committee</json:string><json:string>prisoner</json:string><json:string>probation journal</json:string><json:string>rights culture</json:string><json:string>european convention</json:string><json:string>european court</json:string><json:string>degrading treatment</json:string><json:string>prison authorities</json:string><json:string>government policy</json:string><json:string>domestic courts</json:string><json:string>legal action</json:string><json:string>probation ombudsman</json:string><json:string>other prisons</json:string><json:string>austere regimes</json:string><json:string>home department</json:string><json:string>penal reform</json:string><json:string>home secretary</json:string><json:string>prison staff</json:string><json:string>political agenda</json:string><json:string>national council</json:string><json:string>chief inspector</json:string><json:string>independent monitoring boards</json:string><json:string>purposeful activity</json:string><json:string>former prison governor</json:string><json:string>statutory power</json:string><json:string>david ramsbotham</json:string><json:string>policy terms</json:string><json:string>special cells</json:string><json:string>basic regime</json:string><json:string>supervision centre</json:string><json:string>early release</json:string><json:string>visionary change</json:string><json:string>annual report london</json:string><json:string>fundamental right</json:string><json:string>board members</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>DENNIS EADY</name><affiliations><json:string>PhD Student, Cardiff University</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>HOJO473</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-D1WDXSPS-S</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: The recommendations of the Woolf Report (Woolf and Tumin 1991) promoted the principles of justice and fairness in the running of prisons in England and Wales. This article examines how far a rights culture has developed in prisons since Woolf. This is done with reference to human rights legislation, the role of monitoring bodies and government policy and practice in relation to prisoners' rights and conditions. The article concludes that while some progress has been made through the courts and through pressure from monitoring bodies, government policy and practice has frequently resisted rather than promoted the development of a rights‐based culture.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.224</score><pdfWordCount>5585</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32220</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>430.866 x 649.134 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>102</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>668</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Prisoners' Rights since the Woolf Report: Progress or Procrastination?</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2311</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0265-5527</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1468-2311</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>HOJO</json:string></publisherId><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>264</first><last>275</last><total>12</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1992</json:string><json:string>1981</json:string><json:string>1997</json:string><json:string>1993</json:string><json:string>2002</json:string><json:string>1994</json:string><json:string>2007</json:string><json:string>1999</json:string><json:string>1990</json:string><json:string>2003</json:string><json:string>1995</json:string><json:string>2004</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Prisons and Probation Ombudsman</json:string><json:string>National Council</json:string><json:string>HM Inspector of Prisons for England and Wales</json:string><json:string>UK Human Rights Act</json:string><json:string>UK The Howard Journal Vol</json:string><json:string>European Committee for the Prevention of Torture</json:string><json:string>Prison Reform Trust</json:string><json:string>Parole Board, Ministers</json:string><json:string>CPT</json:string><json:string>UK Government</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>David Ramsbotham</json:string><json:string>David Wilson</json:string><json:string>Howard League</json:string><json:string>Peter Quinn</json:string><json:string>Ann Owers</json:string><json:string>Hilary Benn</json:string><json:string>Stephen Shaw</json:string><json:string>Inspectorate</json:string><json:string>Erwin James</json:string><json:string>Justice Act</json:string><json:string>Lloyd Review</json:string><json:string>Peter Lloyd</json:string><json:string>Inspectors</json:string><json:string>Michael Howard</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>UK</json:string><json:string>Europe</json:string><json:string>Manchester</json:string><json:string>Lord Bridge</json:string></placeName><ref_url><json:string>http://www.homeof</json:string></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>England and Wales 2004, p.44</json:string><json:string>Honigsbaum 2005</json:string><json:string>Shaw 1987</json:string><json:string>Woolf and Tumin 1991</json:string><json:string>Arnett, Coles and Creighton 2000, p.8</json:string><json:string>England and Wales 2004, p.15</json:string><json:string>Archer 2002, p.82</json:string><json:string>Steiner 2003</json:string><json:string>1997, 2001, 2005</json:string><json:string>Casale 2001, p.9</json:string><json:string>August 1999</json:string><json:string>UK Government 2005</json:string><json:string>Thomas 2004, p.8</json:string><json:string>Quinn 1999</json:string><json:string>Solomon 2004, p.11</json:string><json:string>England and Wales 2004, p.19</json:string><json:string>Shaw 2004</json:string><json:string>Davis 2003, p.161</json:string><json:string>Prison Reform Trust 1991</json:string><json:string>Lloyd 2001, p.23</json:string><json:string>Wilson 2005</json:string><json:string>England and Wales 2004, p.7</json:string><json:string>Clare and Bottomley 2001</json:string><json:string>Livingstone and Owen 1999, p.451</json:string><json:string>James 2003, p.77</json:string><json:string>Livingstone and Owen 1999, p.166</json:string><json:string>Leech and Cheney 2000</json:string><json:string>England and Wales 2004</json:string><json:string>Shaw 1987, p.9</json:string><json:string>Solomon 2004</json:string><json:string>Arnott, Coles and Creighton 2000, p.15</json:string><json:string>Lloyd 2001, p.16</json:string><json:string>Ramsbotham 2003, p.66</json:string><json:string>Ramsbotham 2003, p.113</json:string><json:string>October 2005</json:string><json:string>Martin and Godfrey 1994, p.358</json:string><json:string>Solomon 2004, p.20</json:string><json:string>Wadham and Crossman 2000, p.190</json:string><json:string>Machover 2002, p.234</json:string><json:string>Ramsbotham 2003</json:string><json:string>Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600</json:string><json:string>Benn 2003</json:string><json:string>Livingstone and Owen 1999</json:string><json:string>Arnott, Coles and Creighton 2000, p.5</json:string><json:string>Wadham and Crossman 2000, p.189</json:string><json:string>Lloyd 2001</json:string><json:string>Wyner 2002, p.155</json:string><json:string>Shaw 1999</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-D1WDXSPS-S</json:string></ark><categories><wos></wos><scienceMetrix></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Law</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00473.x</json:string></doi><id>972B9F31BF2521217E5670A4C831CDC72DA016B7</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/972B9F31BF2521217E5670A4C831CDC72DA016B7/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/972B9F31BF2521217E5670A4C831CDC72DA016B7/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/972B9F31BF2521217E5670A4C831CDC72DA016B7/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Prisoners' Rights since the Woolf Report: Progress or Procrastination?</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Prisoners' Rights since the Woolf Report: Progress or Procrastination?</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">DENNIS</forename><surname>EADY</surname></persName><affiliation>PhD Student, Cardiff University</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">972B9F31BF2521217E5670A4C831CDC72DA016B7</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-D1WDXSPS-S</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00473.x</idno><idno type="unit">HOJO473</idno><idno type="supplier">473</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:HOJO.HOJO473.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice</title><title level="j" type="alt">HOWARD JOURNAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE</title><idno type="pISSN">0265-5527</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2311</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2311</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/hojo.2007.46.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">HOJO</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">46</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="264">264</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="275">275</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract: </hi> The recommendations of the Woolf Report (<ref type="bibl" target="#b33">Woolf and Tumin 1991</ref>) promoted the principles of justice and fairness in the running of prisons in England and Wales. This article examines how far a rights culture has developed in prisons since Woolf. This is done with reference to human rights legislation, the role of monitoring bodies and government policy and practice in relation to prisoners' rights and conditions. The article concludes that while some progress has been made through the courts and through pressure from monitoring bodies, government policy and practice has frequently resisted rather than promoted the development of a rights‐based culture.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/972B9F31BF2521217E5670A4C831CDC72DA016B7/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2311</doi><issn type="print">0265-5527</issn><issn type="electronic">1468-2311</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="HOJO"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="HOWARD JOURNAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE">The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="07003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/hojo.2007.46.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="46">46</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-07">July 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="4" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00473.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="HOJO473"></id><id type="supplier" value="473"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-06-15"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-06-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-02"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-04"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="264">264</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="275">275</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:HOJO.HOJO473.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Date submitted: September 2005Date accepted: November 2005</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="34"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6325"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="64"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Prisoners' Rights since the Woolf Report: Progress or Procrastination?</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>DENNIS</givenNames><familyName>EADY</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>PhD Student, Cardiff University</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract: </b> The recommendations of the Woolf Report (<link href="#b33">Woolf and Tumin 1991</link>) promoted the principles of justice and fairness in the running of prisons in England and Wales. This article examines how far a rights culture has developed in prisons since Woolf. This is done with reference to human rights legislation, the role of monitoring bodies and government policy and practice in relation to prisoners' rights and conditions. The article concludes that while some progress has been made through the courts and through pressure from monitoring bodies, government policy and practice has frequently resisted rather than promoted the development of a rights‐based culture.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Prisoners' Rights since the Woolf Report: Progress or Procrastination?</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Prisoners' Rights since the Woolf Report: Progress or Procrastination?</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">DENNIS</namePart><namePart type="family">EADY</namePart><affiliation>PhD Student, Cardiff University</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-07</dateIssued><edition>Date submitted: September 2005Date accepted: November 2005</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">0</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">34</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">64</extent><extent unit="words">6325</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract: The recommendations of the Woolf Report (Woolf and Tumin 1991) promoted the principles of justice and fairness in the running of prisons in England and Wales. This article examines how far a rights culture has developed in prisons since Woolf. This is done with reference to human rights legislation, the role of monitoring bodies and government policy and practice in relation to prisoners' rights and conditions. The article concludes that while some progress has been made through the courts and through pressure from monitoring bodies, government policy and practice has frequently resisted rather than promoted the development of a rights‐based culture.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0265-5527</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1468-2311</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2311</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">HOJO</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>46</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>264</start><end>275</end><total>12</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">972B9F31BF2521217E5670A4C831CDC72DA016B7</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-D1WDXSPS-S</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00473.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">HOJO473</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/972B9F31BF2521217E5670A4C831CDC72DA016B7/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004B47 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004B47 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:972B9F31BF2521217E5670A4C831CDC72DA016B7
|texte= Prisoners' Rights since the Woolf Report: Progress or Procrastination?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |