Dental status of the institutionalized elderly population of Edinburgh
Identifieur interne : 004A35 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004A34; suivant : 004A36Dental status of the institutionalized elderly population of Edinburgh
Auteurs : R. D. Manderson ; R. L. EttingerSource :
- Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology [ 0301-5661 ] ; 1975-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Atid, Dent, Dental care, Dental charges, Dental findings, Dental status, Dental treatment, Dentistry, Denture, Edentulous, Edentulous areas, Elderly patients, Elderly people experience, Elderly population, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Mandibular dentures, Natural teeth, Oral surg, Other studies, Public transport, Special skills, Surgical treatment, Total sample.
- Teeft :
- Atid, Dent, Dental care, Dental charges, Dental findings, Dental status, Dental treatment, Dentistry, Denture, Edentulous, Edentulous areas, Elderly patients, Elderly people experience, Elderly population, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Mandibular dentures, Natural teeth, Oral surg, Other studies, Public transport, Special skills, Surgical treatment, Total sample.
Abstract
ABSTRACT A randomly selected population of 442 persons in Edinburgh was interviewed and examined. Although 71 % of the sample required treatment, only 52 % were physically and mentally able to benefit from treatment. Thirty percent of the sample were able to use public transport to attend a dentist, 66 % would require cars and ambulance transport and 4 % were bedridden and would require domiciliary dental services. Twenty‐one percent of the sample had thought about seeking dental treatment, while only 25 % had heard how to claim exemption from or help towards dental charges. Edentulousness was present in 91 % of the sample, only 41 persons having remaining natural teeth. Seventy‐three percent were wearing dentures which required adjustment or replacement, but only 39 % thought their dentures were unsatisfactory. In 58 % of the patients the oral tissues were so deformed or resorbed that the prosthodontic treatment needed would be complex and require special skills. Half of the sample had some form of denture‐induced pathology which required either conservative or surgical treatment.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1975.tb00289.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:94E36753EE6BD223A03E6A9E77372009238FCE5BLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Dental status of the institutionalized elderly population of Edinburgh</title><author><name sortKey="Manderson, R D" sort="Manderson, R D" uniqKey="Manderson R" first="R. D." last="Manderson">R. D. Manderson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University College Hospital, Dental School, London, England</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ettinger, R L" sort="Ettinger, R L" uniqKey="Ettinger R" first="R. L." last="Ettinger">R. L. Ettinger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Removable Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa, U. S. A.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:94E36753EE6BD223A03E6A9E77372009238FCE5B</idno><date when="1975" year="1975">1975</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0528.1975.tb00289.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/94E36753EE6BD223A03E6A9E77372009238FCE5B/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004A35</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004A35</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Dental status of the institutionalized elderly population of Edinburgh</title><author><name sortKey="Manderson, R D" sort="Manderson, R D" uniqKey="Manderson R" first="R. D." last="Manderson">R. D. Manderson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University College Hospital, Dental School, London, England</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ettinger, R L" sort="Ettinger, R L" uniqKey="Ettinger R" first="R. L." last="Ettinger">R. L. Ettinger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Removable Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa, U. S. A.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title><title level="j" type="alt">COMMUNITY DENTISTRY ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0528</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="100">100</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="107">107</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1975-06">1975-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Atid</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental charges</term><term>Dental findings</term><term>Dental status</term><term>Dental treatment</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous areas</term><term>Elderly patients</term><term>Elderly people experience</term><term>Elderly population</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular denture</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Public transport</term><term>Special skills</term><term>Surgical treatment</term><term>Total sample</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Atid</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental charges</term><term>Dental findings</term><term>Dental status</term><term>Dental treatment</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous areas</term><term>Elderly patients</term><term>Elderly people experience</term><term>Elderly population</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular denture</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Public transport</term><term>Special skills</term><term>Surgical treatment</term><term>Total sample</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">ABSTRACT A randomly selected population of 442 persons in Edinburgh was interviewed and examined. Although 71 % of the sample required treatment, only 52 % were physically and mentally able to benefit from treatment. Thirty percent of the sample were able to use public transport to attend a dentist, 66 % would require cars and ambulance transport and 4 % were bedridden and would require domiciliary dental services. Twenty‐one percent of the sample had thought about seeking dental treatment, while only 25 % had heard how to claim exemption from or help towards dental charges. Edentulousness was present in 91 % of the sample, only 41 persons having remaining natural teeth. Seventy‐three percent were wearing dentures which required adjustment or replacement, but only 39 % thought their dentures were unsatisfactory. In 58 % of the patients the oral tissues were so deformed or resorbed that the prosthodontic treatment needed would be complex and require special skills. Half of the sample had some form of denture‐induced pathology which required either conservative or surgical treatment.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>atid</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>dental care</json:string><json:string>elderly patients</json:string><json:string>oral surg</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>dental treatment</json:string><json:string>dental status</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>elderly population</json:string><json:string>special skills</json:string><json:string>surgical treatment</json:string><json:string>public transport</json:string><json:string>dental charges</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>elderly people experience</json:string><json:string>mandibular dentures</json:string><json:string>mandibular denture</json:string><json:string>total sample</json:string><json:string>dental findings</json:string><json:string>edentulous areas</json:string><json:string>other studies</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>R. D. Manderson</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University College Hospital, Dental School, London, England</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>R. L. Ettinger</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Removable Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa, U. S. A.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental health surveys</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>geriatric dentistry</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CDOE100</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-STKV1FD0-6</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>miscellaneous</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>ABSTRACT A randomly selected population of 442 persons in Edinburgh was interviewed and examined. Although 71 % of the sample required treatment, only 52 % were physically and mentally able to benefit from treatment. Thirty percent of the sample were able to use public transport to attend a dentist, 66 % would require cars and ambulance transport and 4 % were bedridden and would require domiciliary dental services. Twenty‐one percent of the sample had thought about seeking dental treatment, while only 25 % had heard how to claim exemption from or help towards dental charges. Edentulousness was present in 91 % of the sample, only 41 persons having remaining natural teeth. Seventy‐three percent were wearing dentures which required adjustment or replacement, but only 39 % thought their dentures were unsatisfactory. In 58 % of the patients the oral tissues were so deformed or resorbed that the prosthodontic treatment needed would be complex and require special skills. Half of the sample had some form of denture‐induced pathology which required either conservative or surgical treatment.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.927</score><pdfWordCount>3851</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>23785</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>528 x 748 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>173</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1098</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>2</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Dental status of the institutionalized elderly population of Edinburgh</title><pmid><json:string>1056813</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0528</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0301-5661</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0528</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CDOE</json:string></publisherId><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>100</first><last>107</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1975</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Social Medicine</json:string><json:string>W. H. O.</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName><json:string>Edinburgh</json:string><json:string>Editiburgh</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-STKV1FD0-6</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string><json:string>2 - public, environmental & occupational health</json:string><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>1975</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1975</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0528.1975.tb00289.x</json:string></doi><id>94E36753EE6BD223A03E6A9E77372009238FCE5B</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/94E36753EE6BD223A03E6A9E77372009238FCE5B/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/94E36753EE6BD223A03E6A9E77372009238FCE5B/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/94E36753EE6BD223A03E6A9E77372009238FCE5B/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Dental status of the institutionalized elderly population of Edinburgh</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1975-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="other" source="miscellaneous" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-7474895G-0">other</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="other"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Dental status of the institutionalized elderly population of Edinburgh</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">R. D.</forename><surname>Manderson</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University College Hospital, Dental School, London, England</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">R. L.</forename><surname>Ettinger</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Removable Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa, U. S. A.<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">94E36753EE6BD223A03E6A9E77372009238FCE5B</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-STKV1FD0-6</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0528.1975.tb00289.x</idno><idno type="unit">CDOE100</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CDOE.CDOE100.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title><title level="j" type="alt">COMMUNITY DENTISTRY ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0301-5661</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0528</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0528</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/com.1975.3.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">CDOE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="100">100</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="107">107</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1975-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">ABSTRACT</hi> A randomly selected population of 442 persons in Edinburgh was interviewed and examined. Although 71 % of the sample required treatment, only 52 % were physically and mentally able to benefit from treatment. Thirty percent of the sample were able to use public transport to attend a dentist, 66 % would require cars and ambulance transport and 4 % were bedridden and would require domiciliary dental services. Twenty‐one percent of the sample had thought about seeking dental treatment, while only 25 % had heard how to claim exemption from or help towards dental charges. Edentulousness was present in 91 % of the sample, only 41 persons having remaining natural teeth. Seventy‐three percent were wearing dentures which required adjustment or replacement, but only 39 % thought their dentures were unsatisfactory. In 58 % of the patients the oral tissues were so deformed or resorbed that the prosthodontic treatment needed would be complex and require special skills. Half of the sample had some form of denture‐induced pathology which required either conservative or surgical treatment.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">dental health surveys</term><term xml:id="k2">geriatric dentistry</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Problems of the Aged and Adults</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/94E36753EE6BD223A03E6A9E77372009238FCE5B/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0528</doi><issn type="print">0301-5661</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0528</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CDOE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="COMMUNITY DENTISTRY ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY">Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/com.1975.3.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="3">3</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1975-06">June 1975</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="miscellaneous" position="0010000" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0528.1975.tb00289.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CDOE100"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Problems of the Aged and Adults</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2006-05-29"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2006-05-29"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="100">100</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="107">107</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University College Hospital, Dental School, Mortimer Market, London WC1E 250, England</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CDOE.CDOE100.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received for publication 20 October 1974, accepted 4 March 1975</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="34"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Dental status of the institutionalized elderly population of Edinburgh</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>R. D.</givenNames><familyName>Manderson</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>R. L.</givenNames><familyName>Ettinger</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University College Hospital, Dental School, London, England</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Removable Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa, U. S. A.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">dental health surveys</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">geriatric dentistry</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>ABSTRACT</b> A randomly selected population of 442 persons in Edinburgh was interviewed and examined. Although 71 % of the sample required treatment, only 52 % were physically and mentally able to benefit from treatment. Thirty percent of the sample were able to use public transport to attend a dentist, 66 % would require cars and ambulance transport and 4 % were bedridden and would require domiciliary dental services. Twenty‐one percent of the sample had thought about seeking dental treatment, while only 25 % had heard how to claim exemption from or help towards dental charges. Edentulousness was present in 91 % of the sample, only 41 persons having remaining natural teeth. Seventy‐three percent were wearing dentures which required adjustment or replacement, but only 39 % thought their dentures were unsatisfactory. In 58 % of the patients the oral tissues were so deformed or resorbed that the prosthodontic treatment needed would be complex and require special skills. Half of the sample had some form of denture‐induced pathology which required either conservative or surgical treatment.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Dental status of the institutionalized elderly population of Edinburgh</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Dental status of the institutionalized elderly population of Edinburgh</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R. D.</namePart><namePart type="family">Manderson</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University College Hospital, Dental School, London, England</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R. L.</namePart><namePart type="family">Ettinger</namePart><affiliation>Department of Removable Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa, U. S. A.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="miscellaneous" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1975-06</dateIssued><edition>Received for publication 20 October 1974, accepted 4 March 1975</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1975</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">34</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">2</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>ABSTRACT A randomly selected population of 442 persons in Edinburgh was interviewed and examined. Although 71 % of the sample required treatment, only 52 % were physically and mentally able to benefit from treatment. Thirty percent of the sample were able to use public transport to attend a dentist, 66 % would require cars and ambulance transport and 4 % were bedridden and would require domiciliary dental services. Twenty‐one percent of the sample had thought about seeking dental treatment, while only 25 % had heard how to claim exemption from or help towards dental charges. Edentulousness was present in 91 % of the sample, only 41 persons having remaining natural teeth. Seventy‐three percent were wearing dentures which required adjustment or replacement, but only 39 % thought their dentures were unsatisfactory. In 58 % of the patients the oral tissues were so deformed or resorbed that the prosthodontic treatment needed would be complex and require special skills. Half of the sample had some form of denture‐induced pathology which required either conservative or surgical treatment.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dental health surveys</topic><topic>geriatric dentistry</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0301-5661</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0528</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0528</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CDOE</identifier><part><date>1975</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>3</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>100</start><end>107</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">94E36753EE6BD223A03E6A9E77372009238FCE5B</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-STKV1FD0-6</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0528.1975.tb00289.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CDOE100</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/94E36753EE6BD223A03E6A9E77372009238FCE5B/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004A35 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004A35 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:94E36753EE6BD223A03E6A9E77372009238FCE5B
|texte= Dental status of the institutionalized elderly population of Edinburgh
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |