Effect of Implant Design on Preservation of Marginal Bone in the Mandible
Identifieur interne : 004A14 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004A13; suivant : 004A15Effect of Implant Design on Preservation of Marginal Bone in the Mandible
Auteurs : Tommie Van De Velde ; Bruno Collaert ; Lars Sennerby ; Hugo De BruynSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2010-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acrylic prosthesis, Astra, Astra tech, Astra tech implants, Astratech implants, Bone level, Bone loss, Bone preservation, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Cumulative percentage, Dental school university, Department periodontology, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous mandibles, Functional loading, Healing abutments, Health sciences, Immediate loading, Immediate occlusal loading, Implant, Implant design, Implant level, Implant success, Implant surgery, Implant types, Machined, Machined implants, Mandible, Marginal bone, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Marginal bone preservation, Microthread, Microthread design, More bone loss, Nobel biocare, Occlusal, Occlusal view, Oral health sciences, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofac implants, Patient level, Periodontology, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis insertion, Provisional reconstruction, Radiographic bone loss, Reference line, Reference point, Retrospective study, Statistical analysis, Surface astra tech, Survival rate, Survival rates, System implants, Thin mucosal tissues, Tioblast, Wilcoxon rank, Xtures.
- Teeft :
- Acrylic prosthesis, Astra, Astra tech, Astra tech implants, Astratech implants, Bone level, Bone loss, Bone preservation, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Cumulative percentage, Dental school university, Department periodontology, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous mandibles, Functional loading, Healing abutments, Health sciences, Immediate loading, Immediate occlusal loading, Implant, Implant design, Implant level, Implant success, Implant surgery, Implant types, Machined, Machined implants, Mandible, Marginal bone, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Marginal bone preservation, Microthread, Microthread design, More bone loss, Nobel biocare, Occlusal, Occlusal view, Oral health sciences, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofac implants, Patient level, Periodontology, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis insertion, Provisional reconstruction, Radiographic bone loss, Reference line, Reference point, Retrospective study, Statistical analysis, Surface astra tech, Survival rate, Survival rates, System implants, Thin mucosal tissues, Tioblast, Wilcoxon rank, Xtures.
Abstract
Background: Implant design and surface may have an influence on the marginal bone response during immediate functional loading.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00145.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9463EFE914CAE39D75973FF2E81D0FBD518A3578Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effect of Implant Design on Preservation of Marginal Bone in the Mandible</title><author><name sortKey="Van De Velde, Tommie" sort="Van De Velde, Tommie" uniqKey="Van De Velde T" first="Tommie" last="Van De Velde">Tommie Van De Velde</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant professor, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐ P8, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Collaert, Bruno" sort="Collaert, Bruno" uniqKey="Collaert B" first="Bruno" last="Collaert">Bruno Collaert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>periodontist, Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden, and Center Periodontology & Implantology Leuven, Groenveldstraat 11, Heverlee, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, Lars" sort="Sennerby, Lars" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="Lars" last="Sennerby">Lars Sennerby</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor, Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor and chairman, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐ P8, Belgium, and Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9463EFE914CAE39D75973FF2E81D0FBD518A3578</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00145.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9463EFE914CAE39D75973FF2E81D0FBD518A3578/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004A14</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004A14</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Effect of Implant Design on Preservation of Marginal Bone in the Mandible</title><author><name sortKey="Van De Velde, Tommie" sort="Van De Velde, Tommie" uniqKey="Van De Velde T" first="Tommie" last="Van De Velde">Tommie Van De Velde</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant professor, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐ P8, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Collaert, Bruno" sort="Collaert, Bruno" uniqKey="Collaert B" first="Bruno" last="Collaert">Bruno Collaert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>periodontist, Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden, and Center Periodontology & Implantology Leuven, Groenveldstraat 11, Heverlee, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, Lars" sort="Sennerby, Lars" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="Lars" last="Sennerby">Lars Sennerby</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor, Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor and chairman, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐ P8, Belgium, and Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="134">134</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="141">141</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-06">2010-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic prosthesis</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Astra tech implants</term><term>Astratech implants</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone preservation</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Cumulative percentage</term><term>Dental school university</term><term>Department periodontology</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous mandibles</term><term>Functional loading</term><term>Healing abutments</term><term>Health sciences</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immediate occlusal loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant level</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implant types</term><term>Machined</term><term>Machined implants</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Marginal bone preservation</term><term>Microthread</term><term>Microthread design</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Occlusal view</term><term>Oral health sciences</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Patient level</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis insertion</term><term>Provisional reconstruction</term><term>Radiographic bone loss</term><term>Reference line</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Surface astra tech</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>System implants</term><term>Thin mucosal tissues</term><term>Tioblast</term><term>Wilcoxon rank</term><term>Xtures</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic prosthesis</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Astra tech implants</term><term>Astratech implants</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone preservation</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Cumulative percentage</term><term>Dental school university</term><term>Department periodontology</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous mandibles</term><term>Functional loading</term><term>Healing abutments</term><term>Health sciences</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immediate occlusal loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant level</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implant types</term><term>Machined</term><term>Machined implants</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Marginal bone preservation</term><term>Microthread</term><term>Microthread design</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Occlusal view</term><term>Oral health sciences</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Patient level</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis insertion</term><term>Provisional reconstruction</term><term>Radiographic bone loss</term><term>Reference line</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Surface astra tech</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>System implants</term><term>Thin mucosal tissues</term><term>Tioblast</term><term>Wilcoxon rank</term><term>Xtures</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: Implant design and surface may have an influence on the marginal bone response during immediate functional loading.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>tioblast</json:string><json:string>implant design</json:string><json:string>microthread</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandible</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>machined</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>xtures</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>machined implants</json:string><json:string>occlusal</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>astra</json:string><json:string>bone preservation</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>department periodontology</json:string><json:string>marginal bone preservation</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>functional loading</json:string><json:string>astra tech</json:string><json:string>microthread design</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>surface astra tech</json:string><json:string>dental school university</json:string><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>occlusal view</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>oral implantology</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandibles</json:string><json:string>marginal bone</json:string><json:string>implant level</json:string><json:string>implant success</json:string><json:string>wilcoxon rank</json:string><json:string>system implants</json:string><json:string>acrylic prosthesis</json:string><json:string>statistical analysis</json:string><json:string>provisional reconstruction</json:string><json:string>reference point</json:string><json:string>patient level</json:string><json:string>astra tech implants</json:string><json:string>healing abutments</json:string><json:string>prosthesis insertion</json:string><json:string>more bone loss</json:string><json:string>cumulative percentage</json:string><json:string>reference line</json:string><json:string>implant types</json:string><json:string>thin mucosal tissues</json:string><json:string>radiographic bone loss</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>astratech implants</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>implant surgery</json:string><json:string>immediate occlusal loading</json:string><json:string>oral health sciences</json:string><json:string>survival rates</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Tommie Van de Velde DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Assistant professor, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐ P8, Belgium;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Bruno Collaert DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>periodontist, Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden, and Center Periodontology & Implantology Leuven, Groenveldstraat 11, Heverlee, Belgium;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Lars Sennerby DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>professor, Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Hugo De Bruyn DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>professor and chairman, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐ P8, Belgium, and Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</json:string><json:string>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>immediate loading</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant design</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant surface</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>turned surface</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID145</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-NDNRRB28-Z</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Implant design and surface may have an influence on the marginal bone response during immediate functional loading.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.372</score><pdfWordCount>3156</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>19710</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>18</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>127</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Effect of Implant Design on Preservation of Marginal Bone in the Mandible</title><pmid><json:string>19220843</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>134</first><last>141</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1992</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Belgium, and Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden Turned</json:string><json:string>Department Periodontology and Oral</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Sticktech</json:string><json:string>Sticktech Ltd.</json:string><json:string>Dental School University</json:string><json:string>Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden, and Center Periodontology</json:string><json:string>Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string><json:string>University Hospital Ghent</json:string><json:string>AstraTech</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Mi</json:string><json:string>Hugo De Bruyn</json:string><json:string>Consensus</json:string><json:string>Ma</json:string><json:string>Ti</json:string><json:string>T. Rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>Lars Sennerby</json:string><json:string>Friberg</json:string><json:string>Tan A. Effects</json:string><json:string>Bruno Collaert</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Ghent</json:string><json:string>Finland</json:string><json:string>Jokstad</json:string><json:string>Turku</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Amsterdam</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-NDNRRB28-Z</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00145.x</json:string></doi><id>9463EFE914CAE39D75973FF2E81D0FBD518A3578</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9463EFE914CAE39D75973FF2E81D0FBD518A3578/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9463EFE914CAE39D75973FF2E81D0FBD518A3578/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/9463EFE914CAE39D75973FF2E81D0FBD518A3578/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Effect of Implant Design on Preservation of Marginal Bone in the Mandible</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2009, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2009, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Effect of Implant Design on Preservation of Marginal Bone in the Mandible</title><title level="a" type="short">Effect of Implant Design on Marginal Bone Preservation</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Tommie</forename><surname>Van de Velde</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Assistant professor, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐ P8, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Bruno</forename><surname>Collaert</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>periodontist, Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden, and Center Periodontology & Implantology Leuven, Groenveldstraat 11, Heverlee, Belgium;</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Lars</forename><surname>Sennerby</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>professor, Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden;<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Hugo</forename><surname>De Bruyn</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>professor and chairman, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐ P8, Belgium, and Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>Prof. Dr. Hugo De Bruyn, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐P8, B‐9000 Belgium; e‐mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">9463EFE914CAE39D75973FF2E81D0FBD518A3578</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-NDNRRB28-Z</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00145.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID145</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID145.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2010.12.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="134">134</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="141">141</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi> Implant design and surface may have an influence on the marginal bone response during immediate functional loading.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Aim:</hi> The purpose of this study was to radiographically study the effect of implant design on marginal bone preservation at immediately loaded implants used for prosthetic rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> A total of 39 patients, previously treated with five implants for support of a full‐arch fixed bridge in the mandible, were included in the study. Either machined Brånemark® implants (Ma) (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) or surface modified Astra Tech® implants with (Mi) or without a microthreaded neck (Ti) (TiOblast, AstraTech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) were used. All fixtures were loaded with a provisional glass fiber or metal‐reinforced screw‐retained restoration within 24 hours. The provisional restorations were replaced by a 12‐unit screw‐retained metal‐ceramic or metal‐resin cantilever bridge after 3 months. Bone loss from baseline to 1 year of loading was measured by means of intraoral radiographs. Only patients with baseline and 1‐year radiographs of all implants were selected for comparison. Statistical analysis was carried out on both patient and implant levels.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> The survival rates after 1 year in function were 98.6, 100, and 100% for the Ma, Ti, and Mi implants, respectively. The overall mean bone loss after 1 year was 1.03 mm (SD 0.87; range −0.77 to 2.5). The mean bone loss was calculated to 1.52 (SD 0.66) for the Ma group, 0.79 (SD 0.79) for the Ti group, and 0.70 (SD 1.01) for the Mi group. There was a significant difference between Ma and Ti (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .023) and between Ma and Mi (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .046) groups but not within Ti and Mi implants (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .70). These conclusions were also valid when the statistical analysis was performed on implant level.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions:</hi> There is no impact of design and surface on implant survival in the completely edentulous mandible. Bone preservation in immediately loaded implants in the mandible is influenced by implant design and significantly better on surface‐modified AstraTech implants compared with machined Brånemark implants. In the mandible, a microthread design of the implant collar does not seem to improve bone preservation.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">immediate loading</term><term xml:id="k2">implant design</term><term xml:id="k3">implant surface</term><term xml:id="k4">turned surface</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9463EFE914CAE39D75973FF2E81D0FBD518A3578/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2010.12.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="12">12</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-06">June 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="7" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00145.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID145"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2009, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-02-13"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-05-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.6 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-05-05"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="134">134</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="141">141</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Prof. Dr. Hugo De Bruyn, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐P8, B‐9000 Belgium; e‐mail: <email>hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID145.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="22"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="3477"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Effect of Implant Design on Preservation of Marginal Bone in the Mandible</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume 12, Number 2, 2010</title><title type="short">Effect of Implant Design on Marginal Bone Preservation</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Tommie</givenNames><familyName>Van de Velde</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Bruno</givenNames><familyName>Collaert</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Lars</givenNames><familyName>Sennerby</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Hugo</givenNames><familyName>De Bruyn</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Assistant professor, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐ P8, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>periodontist, Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden, and Center Periodontology & Implantology Leuven, Groenveldstraat 11, Heverlee, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>professor, Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4"><unparsedAffiliation>professor and chairman, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐ P8, Belgium, and Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">immediate loading</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implant design</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">implant surface</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">turned surface</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background:</b> Implant design and surface may have an influence on the marginal bone response during immediate functional loading.</p><p><b>Aim:</b> The purpose of this study was to radiographically study the effect of implant design on marginal bone preservation at immediately loaded implants used for prosthetic rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 39 patients, previously treated with five implants for support of a full‐arch fixed bridge in the mandible, were included in the study. Either machined Brånemark® implants (Ma) (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) or surface modified Astra Tech® implants with (Mi) or without a microthreaded neck (Ti) (TiOblast, AstraTech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) were used. All fixtures were loaded with a provisional glass fiber or metal‐reinforced screw‐retained restoration within 24 hours. The provisional restorations were replaced by a 12‐unit screw‐retained metal‐ceramic or metal‐resin cantilever bridge after 3 months. Bone loss from baseline to 1 year of loading was measured by means of intraoral radiographs. Only patients with baseline and 1‐year radiographs of all implants were selected for comparison. Statistical analysis was carried out on both patient and implant levels.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The survival rates after 1 year in function were 98.6, 100, and 100% for the Ma, Ti, and Mi implants, respectively. The overall mean bone loss after 1 year was 1.03 mm (SD 0.87; range −0.77 to 2.5). The mean bone loss was calculated to 1.52 (SD 0.66) for the Ma group, 0.79 (SD 0.79) for the Ti group, and 0.70 (SD 1.01) for the Mi group. There was a significant difference between Ma and Ti (<i>p</i> = .023) and between Ma and Mi (<i>p</i> = .046) groups but not within Ti and Mi implants (<i>p</i> = .70). These conclusions were also valid when the statistical analysis was performed on implant level.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> There is no impact of design and surface on implant survival in the completely edentulous mandible. Bone preservation in immediately loaded implants in the mandible is influenced by implant design and significantly better on surface‐modified AstraTech implants compared with machined Brånemark implants. In the mandible, a microthread design of the implant collar does not seem to improve bone preservation.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Effect of Implant Design on Preservation of Marginal Bone in the Mandible</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Effect of Implant Design on Marginal Bone Preservation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Effect of Implant Design on Preservation of Marginal Bone in the Mandible</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Tommie</namePart><namePart type="family">Van de Velde</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Assistant professor, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐ P8, Belgium;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Bruno</namePart><namePart type="family">Collaert</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>periodontist, Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden, and Center Periodontology & Implantology Leuven, Groenveldstraat 11, Heverlee, Belgium;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lars</namePart><namePart type="family">Sennerby</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>professor, Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Hugo</namePart><namePart type="family">De Bruyn</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>professor and chairman, Department Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185‐ P8, Belgium, and Department Periodontology, Center for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: hugo.debruyn@ugent.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-06</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">6</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">22</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">3477</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: Implant design and surface may have an influence on the marginal bone response during immediate functional loading.</abstract><abstract>Aim: The purpose of this study was to radiographically study the effect of implant design on marginal bone preservation at immediately loaded implants used for prosthetic rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: A total of 39 patients, previously treated with five implants for support of a full‐arch fixed bridge in the mandible, were included in the study. Either machined Brånemark® implants (Ma) (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) or surface modified Astra Tech® implants with (Mi) or without a microthreaded neck (Ti) (TiOblast, AstraTech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) were used. All fixtures were loaded with a provisional glass fiber or metal‐reinforced screw‐retained restoration within 24 hours. The provisional restorations were replaced by a 12‐unit screw‐retained metal‐ceramic or metal‐resin cantilever bridge after 3 months. Bone loss from baseline to 1 year of loading was measured by means of intraoral radiographs. Only patients with baseline and 1‐year radiographs of all implants were selected for comparison. Statistical analysis was carried out on both patient and implant levels.</abstract><abstract>Results: The survival rates after 1 year in function were 98.6, 100, and 100% for the Ma, Ti, and Mi implants, respectively. The overall mean bone loss after 1 year was 1.03 mm (SD 0.87; range −0.77 to 2.5). The mean bone loss was calculated to 1.52 (SD 0.66) for the Ma group, 0.79 (SD 0.79) for the Ti group, and 0.70 (SD 1.01) for the Mi group. There was a significant difference between Ma and Ti (p = .023) and between Ma and Mi (p = .046) groups but not within Ti and Mi implants (p = .70). These conclusions were also valid when the statistical analysis was performed on implant level.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: There is no impact of design and surface on implant survival in the completely edentulous mandible. Bone preservation in immediately loaded implants in the mandible is influenced by implant design and significantly better on surface‐modified AstraTech implants compared with machined Brånemark implants. In the mandible, a microthread design of the implant collar does not seem to improve bone preservation.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>immediate loading</topic><topic>implant design</topic><topic>implant surface</topic><topic>turned surface</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>12</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>134</start><end>141</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">9463EFE914CAE39D75973FF2E81D0FBD518A3578</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-NDNRRB28-Z</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00145.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID145</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2009, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9463EFE914CAE39D75973FF2E81D0FBD518A3578/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004A14 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004A14 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9463EFE914CAE39D75973FF2E81D0FBD518A3578
|texte= Effect of Implant Design on Preservation of Marginal Bone in the Mandible
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |