Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs
Identifieur interne : 004919 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004918; suivant : 004920Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs
Auteurs : Henning Schliephake ; Thomas Hefti ; Falko Schlottig ; Philippe Gédet ; Henning StaedtSource :
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 2010-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Anchorage, Bone formation, Bone regeneration, Bone tissue, Bone volume density, Chemical composition, Clear peak, Connector, Connector walls, Control titanium implants, Dental implants, Dentistry, Etching, Etching process, Failure point, Histologic, Histomorphometric, Implant, Implant contact, Implant surface, Implant surfaces, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons zirconia implants, Mandible, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Mechanical anchorage, Mechanical testing, Micrograph, Microroughness, Minipigs, Osseointegration, Present study, Prosthetic dentistry, Reference titanium surface, Regeneration, Removal torque, Removal torque values, Rough surface, Rough titanium surfaces, Roughness, Sandblasted, Sandblasted surface, Sandblasted surfaces, Sandblasted zirconia, Sandblasted zirconia implants, Sandblasted zirconia surface, Sandblasting, Schliephake, Sennerby, Soft tissue, Submicron range, Surface features, Surface roughness, Surface topography, Titanium, Titanium implant, Titanium implants, Titanium surface, Titanium surfaces, Torque, Zirconia, Zirconia implant, Zirconia implant surfaces, Zirconia implants, Zirconia surface, Zirconia surfaces.
- Teeft :
- Anchorage, Bone formation, Bone regeneration, Bone tissue, Bone volume density, Chemical composition, Clear peak, Connector, Connector walls, Control titanium implants, Dental implants, Dentistry, Etching, Etching process, Failure point, Histologic, Histomorphometric, Implant, Implant contact, Implant surface, Implant surfaces, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons zirconia implants, Mandible, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Mechanical anchorage, Mechanical testing, Micrograph, Microroughness, Minipigs, Osseointegration, Present study, Prosthetic dentistry, Reference titanium surface, Regeneration, Removal torque, Removal torque values, Rough surface, Rough titanium surfaces, Roughness, Sandblasted, Sandblasted surface, Sandblasted surfaces, Sandblasted zirconia, Sandblasted zirconia implants, Sandblasted zirconia surface, Sandblasting, Schliephake, Sennerby, Soft tissue, Submicron range, Surface features, Surface roughness, Surface topography, Titanium, Titanium implant, Titanium implants, Titanium surface, Titanium surfaces, Torque, Zirconia, Zirconia implant, Zirconia implant surfaces, Zirconia implants, Zirconia surface, Zirconia surfaces.
Abstract
Schliephake H, Hefti T, Schlottig F, Gédet P, Staedt H. Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 818–828. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01549.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01549.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9253B076CF7BDC67B92E2EA93DA7EB35F8BE0B7DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs</title><author><name sortKey="Schliephake, Henning" sort="Schliephake, Henning" uniqKey="Schliephake H" first="Henning" last="Schliephake">Henning Schliephake</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, George‐Augusta‐University, Göttingen, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hefti, Thomas" sort="Hefti, Thomas" uniqKey="Hefti T" first="Thomas" last="Hefti">Thomas Hefti</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Thommen Medical, Waldenburg, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schlottig, Falko" sort="Schlottig, Falko" uniqKey="Schlottig F" first="Falko" last="Schlottig">Falko Schlottig</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Thommen Medical, Waldenburg, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gedet, Philippe" sort="Gedet, Philippe" uniqKey="Gedet P" first="Philippe" last="Gédet">Philippe Gédet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>MEM Research Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Staedt, Henning" sort="Staedt, Henning" uniqKey="Staedt H" first="Henning" last="Staedt">Henning Staedt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, George‐Augusta‐University, Göttingen, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9253B076CF7BDC67B92E2EA93DA7EB35F8BE0B7D</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01549.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9253B076CF7BDC67B92E2EA93DA7EB35F8BE0B7D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004919</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004919</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs</title><author><name sortKey="Schliephake, Henning" sort="Schliephake, Henning" uniqKey="Schliephake H" first="Henning" last="Schliephake">Henning Schliephake</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, George‐Augusta‐University, Göttingen, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hefti, Thomas" sort="Hefti, Thomas" uniqKey="Hefti T" first="Thomas" last="Hefti">Thomas Hefti</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Thommen Medical, Waldenburg, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schlottig, Falko" sort="Schlottig, Falko" uniqKey="Schlottig F" first="Falko" last="Schlottig">Falko Schlottig</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Thommen Medical, Waldenburg, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gedet, Philippe" sort="Gedet, Philippe" uniqKey="Gedet P" first="Philippe" last="Gédet">Philippe Gédet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>MEM Research Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Staedt, Henning" sort="Staedt, Henning" uniqKey="Staedt H" first="Henning" last="Staedt">Henning Staedt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, George‐Augusta‐University, Göttingen, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">37</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="818">818</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="828">828</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-09">2010-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anchorage</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Bone tissue</term><term>Bone volume density</term><term>Chemical composition</term><term>Clear peak</term><term>Connector</term><term>Connector walls</term><term>Control titanium implants</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Etching</term><term>Etching process</term><term>Failure point</term><term>Histologic</term><term>Histomorphometric</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant contact</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons zirconia implants</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Mechanical anchorage</term><term>Mechanical testing</term><term>Micrograph</term><term>Microroughness</term><term>Minipigs</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Reference titanium surface</term><term>Regeneration</term><term>Removal torque</term><term>Removal torque values</term><term>Rough surface</term><term>Rough titanium surfaces</term><term>Roughness</term><term>Sandblasted</term><term>Sandblasted surface</term><term>Sandblasted surfaces</term><term>Sandblasted zirconia</term><term>Sandblasted zirconia implants</term><term>Sandblasted zirconia surface</term><term>Sandblasting</term><term>Schliephake</term><term>Sennerby</term><term>Soft tissue</term><term>Submicron range</term><term>Surface features</term><term>Surface roughness</term><term>Surface topography</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implant</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Titanium surface</term><term>Titanium surfaces</term><term>Torque</term><term>Zirconia</term><term>Zirconia implant</term><term>Zirconia implant surfaces</term><term>Zirconia implants</term><term>Zirconia surface</term><term>Zirconia surfaces</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Anchorage</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Bone tissue</term><term>Bone volume density</term><term>Chemical composition</term><term>Clear peak</term><term>Connector</term><term>Connector walls</term><term>Control titanium implants</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Etching</term><term>Etching process</term><term>Failure point</term><term>Histologic</term><term>Histomorphometric</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant contact</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons zirconia implants</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Mechanical anchorage</term><term>Mechanical testing</term><term>Micrograph</term><term>Microroughness</term><term>Minipigs</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Reference titanium surface</term><term>Regeneration</term><term>Removal torque</term><term>Removal torque values</term><term>Rough surface</term><term>Rough titanium surfaces</term><term>Roughness</term><term>Sandblasted</term><term>Sandblasted surface</term><term>Sandblasted surfaces</term><term>Sandblasted zirconia</term><term>Sandblasted zirconia implants</term><term>Sandblasted zirconia surface</term><term>Sandblasting</term><term>Schliephake</term><term>Sennerby</term><term>Soft tissue</term><term>Submicron range</term><term>Surface features</term><term>Surface roughness</term><term>Surface topography</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implant</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Titanium surface</term><term>Titanium surfaces</term><term>Torque</term><term>Zirconia</term><term>Zirconia implant</term><term>Zirconia implant surfaces</term><term>Zirconia implants</term><term>Zirconia surface</term><term>Zirconia surfaces</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Schliephake H, Hefti T, Schlottig F, Gédet P, Staedt H. Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 818–828. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01549.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>zirconia</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>sandblasted</json:string><json:string>zirconia surfaces</json:string><json:string>zirconia implants</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>titanium surface</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>zirconia surface</json:string><json:string>removal torque</json:string><json:string>minipigs</json:string><json:string>titanium surfaces</json:string><json:string>etching</json:string><json:string>bone formation</json:string><json:string>implant surface</json:string><json:string>micrograph</json:string><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>sandblasting</json:string><json:string>schliephake</json:string><json:string>histomorphometric</json:string><json:string>failure point</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>surface roughness</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>connector</json:string><json:string>microroughness</json:string><json:string>histologic</json:string><json:string>bone regeneration</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>sennerby</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>anchorage</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons zirconia implants</json:string><json:string>zirconia implant</json:string><json:string>titanium implant</json:string><json:string>submicron range</json:string><json:string>mechanical testing</json:string><json:string>mechanical anchorage</json:string><json:string>regeneration</json:string><json:string>roughness</json:string><json:string>sandblasted surface</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>surface topography</json:string><json:string>connector walls</json:string><json:string>sandblasted zirconia surface</json:string><json:string>soft tissue</json:string><json:string>clear peak</json:string><json:string>etching process</json:string><json:string>sandblasted zirconia</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>implant contact</json:string><json:string>implant surfaces</json:string><json:string>chemical composition</json:string><json:string>reference titanium surface</json:string><json:string>removal torque values</json:string><json:string>sandblasted zirconia implants</json:string><json:string>bone tissue</json:string><json:string>surface features</json:string><json:string>control titanium implants</json:string><json:string>bone volume density</json:string><json:string>rough titanium surfaces</json:string><json:string>rough surface</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>zirconia implant surfaces</json:string><json:string>sandblasted surfaces</json:string><json:string>torque</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Henning Schliephake</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, George‐Augusta‐University, Göttingen, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Thomas Hefti</name><affiliations><json:string>Thommen Medical, Waldenburg, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Falko Schlottig</name><affiliations><json:string>Thommen Medical, Waldenburg, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Philippe Gédet</name><affiliations><json:string>MEM Research Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Henning Staedt</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, George‐Augusta‐University, Göttingen, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>animal study</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osseointegration</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>surface roughness</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>titanium</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>zirconia</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JCPE1549</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-9Q2QTKZC-7</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Schliephake H, Hefti T, Schlottig F, Gédet P, Staedt H. Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 818–828. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01549.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>29</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>225</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><score>7.348</score><pdfWordCount>6342</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>42384</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs</title><pmid><json:string>20573183</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0303-6979</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-051X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JCPE</json:string></publisherId><volume>37</volume><issue>9</issue><pages><first>818</first><last>828</last><total>11</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>61s</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>MEM Research Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Casa Software Ltd.</json:string><json:string>Robert Mathys Foundation</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Philippe Gedet</json:string><json:string>Kohal</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Micrograph</json:string><json:string>Roman Heuberger</json:string><json:string>Sennerby</json:string><json:string>Bachle</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Berlin</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>UK</json:string><json:string>Austria</json:string><json:string>Manchester</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Kohal et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Canullo 2007</json:string><json:string>Palmieri et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Groessner-Schreiber et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Schliephake et al.</json:string><json:string>Whitehouse 1994</json:string><json:string>Leong et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Kokubo et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Ferguson et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Kosmulski 2004</json:string><json:string>Fuerst et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Aparicio et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Hempel et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Bornstein et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Gahlert et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Fuerst et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Sennerby et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Wenz et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Roessler et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Oliva et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Bachle et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Schliephake & Scharnweber 2008</json:string><json:string>Zechner et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Gahlert et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Akagawa et al. 1993, 1998</json:string><json:string>Wieland et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Jung et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Hempel et al.</json:string><json:string>Park 2007</json:string><json:string>Andreiotelli et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Rimondini et al. 2002</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-9Q2QTKZC-7</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01549.x</json:string></doi><id>9253B076CF7BDC67B92E2EA93DA7EB35F8BE0B7D</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9253B076CF7BDC67B92E2EA93DA7EB35F8BE0B7D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9253B076CF7BDC67B92E2EA93DA7EB35F8BE0B7D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/9253B076CF7BDC67B92E2EA93DA7EB35F8BE0B7D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-09"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs</title><title level="a" type="short">Modified zirconia implants in minipigs</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Henning</forename><surname>Schliephake</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, George‐Augusta‐University, Göttingen, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Thomas</forename><surname>Hefti</surname></persName><affiliation>Thommen Medical, Waldenburg, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Falko</forename><surname>Schlottig</surname></persName><affiliation>Thommen Medical, Waldenburg, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Philippe</forename><surname>Gédet</surname></persName><affiliation>MEM Research Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Henning</forename><surname>Staedt</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, George‐Augusta‐University, Göttingen, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">9253B076CF7BDC67B92E2EA93DA7EB35F8BE0B7D</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-9Q2QTKZC-7</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01549.x</idno><idno type="unit">JCPE1549</idno><idno type="supplier">1549</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JCPE.JCPE1549.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cpe.2010.37.issue-9</idno><idno type="product">JCPE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">37</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="818">818</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="828">828</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-09"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>
<hi rend="italic">Schliephake H, Hefti T, Schlottig F, Gédet P, Staedt H. Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 818–828. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01549</hi>.</p>
Abstract
<p><hi rend="bold">Aim: </hi> To test the hypothesis that peri‐implant bone formation and mechanical stability of surface‐modified zirconia and titanium implants are equivalent.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods: </hi> Twelve minipigs received three types of implants on either side of the mandible 8 weeks after removal of all pre‐molar teeth: (i) a zirconia implant with a sandblasted surface; (ii) a zirconia implants with a sandblasted and etched surface; and (iii) a titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid‐etched surface that served as a control. Removal torque and peri‐implant bone regeneration were evaluated in six animals each after 4 and 13 weeks.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> The titanium surface was significantly rougher than both tested zirconia surfaces. Mean bone to implant contact (BIC) did not differ significantly between the three implant types after 4 weeks but was significantly higher for titanium compared with both zirconia implants after 13 weeks (<hi rend="italic">p</hi><0.05). Bone volume density (BVD) did not differ significantly at any interval. Removal torque was significantly higher for titanium compared with both zirconia surfaces after 4 and 13 weeks (<hi rend="italic">p</hi><0.001). The sandblasted and etched zirconia surface showed a significantly higher removal torque after 4 weeks compared with sandblasted zirconia (<hi rend="italic">p</hi><0.05); this difference levelled out after 13 weeks.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> It is concluded that all implants achieved osseointegration with similar degrees of BIC and BVD; however, titanium implants showed a higher resistance to removal torque, probably due to higher surface roughness.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">animal study</term><term xml:id="k2">osseointegration</term><term xml:id="k3">surface roughness</term><term xml:id="k4">titanium</term><term xml:id="k5">zirconia</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Periodontal Diseases</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9253B076CF7BDC67B92E2EA93DA7EB35F8BE0B7D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</doi><issn type="print">0303-6979</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-051X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09009"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cpe.2010.37.issue-9</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="37">37</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="9">9</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-09">September 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="5" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01549.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCPE1549"></id><id type="supplier" value="1549"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="11"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Periodontal Diseases</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-06-22"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.15 mode:FullText" date="2010-08-15"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-06-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-08-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="818">818</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="828">828</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Address:
<i>H. Schliephake</i>
<i>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</i>
<i>George‐Augusta‐University</i>
<i>Robert‐Koch‐Str. 40</i>
<i>37075 Göttingen</i>
<i>Germany</i>
E‐mail: <email normalForm="schliephake.henning@med.uni-goettingen.de">schliephake.henning@med.uni‐goettingen.de</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPE.JCPE1549.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 9 January 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="35"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="8228"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="60"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs</title><title type="shortAuthors">Schliephake et al.</title><title type="short">Modified zirconia implants in minipigs</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Henning</givenNames><familyName>Schliephake</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Thomas</givenNames><familyName>Hefti</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Falko</givenNames><familyName>Schlottig</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Philippe</givenNames><familyName>Gédet</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Henning</givenNames><familyName>Staedt</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, George‐Augusta‐University, Göttingen, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>Thommen Medical, Waldenburg, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>MEM Research Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">animal study</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">osseointegration</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">surface roughness</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">titanium</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">zirconia</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><section xml:id="sec-sum-1"><p> <i>Schliephake H, Hefti T, Schlottig F, Gédet P, Staedt H. Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 818–828. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01549</i>.</p></section><section xml:id="abs1-1"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Aim: </b> To test the hypothesis that peri‐implant bone formation and mechanical stability of surface‐modified zirconia and titanium implants are equivalent.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods: </b> Twelve minipigs received three types of implants on either side of the mandible 8 weeks after removal of all pre‐molar teeth: (i) a zirconia implant with a sandblasted surface; (ii) a zirconia implants with a sandblasted and etched surface; and (iii) a titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid‐etched surface that served as a control. Removal torque and peri‐implant bone regeneration were evaluated in six animals each after 4 and 13 weeks.</p><p><b>Results: </b> The titanium surface was significantly rougher than both tested zirconia surfaces. Mean bone to implant contact (BIC) did not differ significantly between the three implant types after 4 weeks but was significantly higher for titanium compared with both zirconia implants after 13 weeks (<i>p</i><0.05). Bone volume density (BVD) did not differ significantly at any interval. Removal torque was significantly higher for titanium compared with both zirconia surfaces after 4 and 13 weeks (<i>p</i><0.001). The sandblasted and etched zirconia surface showed a significantly higher removal torque after 4 weeks compared with sandblasted zirconia (<i>p</i><0.05); this difference levelled out after 13 weeks.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> It is concluded that all implants achieved osseointegration with similar degrees of BIC and BVD; however, titanium implants showed a higher resistance to removal torque, probably due to higher surface roughness.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1" numbered="no"><p><b>Conflict of interest and source of funding statement</b>
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this study.
This study was supported by a grant from Thommen Medical.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Modified zirconia implants in minipigs</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Henning</namePart><namePart type="family">Schliephake</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, George‐Augusta‐University, Göttingen, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Thomas</namePart><namePart type="family">Hefti</namePart><affiliation>Thommen Medical, Waldenburg, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Falko</namePart><namePart type="family">Schlottig</namePart><affiliation>Thommen Medical, Waldenburg, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Philippe</namePart><namePart type="family">Gédet</namePart><affiliation>MEM Research Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Henning</namePart><namePart type="family">Staedt</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, George‐Augusta‐University, Göttingen, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-09</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 9 January 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">6</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">35</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">60</extent><extent unit="words">8228</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Schliephake H, Hefti T, Schlottig F, Gédet P, Staedt H. Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 818–828. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01549.</abstract><abstract>Aim: To test the hypothesis that peri‐implant bone formation and mechanical stability of surface‐modified zirconia and titanium implants are equivalent. Materials and Methods: Twelve minipigs received three types of implants on either side of the mandible 8 weeks after removal of all pre‐molar teeth: (i) a zirconia implant with a sandblasted surface; (ii) a zirconia implants with a sandblasted and etched surface; and (iii) a titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid‐etched surface that served as a control. Removal torque and peri‐implant bone regeneration were evaluated in six animals each after 4 and 13 weeks. Results: The titanium surface was significantly rougher than both tested zirconia surfaces. Mean bone to implant contact (BIC) did not differ significantly between the three implant types after 4 weeks but was significantly higher for titanium compared with both zirconia implants after 13 weeks (p<0.05). Bone volume density (BVD) did not differ significantly at any interval. Removal torque was significantly higher for titanium compared with both zirconia surfaces after 4 and 13 weeks (p<0.001). The sandblasted and etched zirconia surface showed a significantly higher removal torque after 4 weeks compared with sandblasted zirconia (p<0.05); this difference levelled out after 13 weeks. Conclusions: It is concluded that all implants achieved osseointegration with similar degrees of BIC and BVD; however, titanium implants showed a higher resistance to removal torque, probably due to higher surface roughness.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>animal study</topic><topic>osseointegration</topic><topic>surface roughness</topic><topic>titanium</topic><topic>zirconia</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0303-6979</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPE</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>37</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>9</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>818</start><end>828</end><total>11</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">9253B076CF7BDC67B92E2EA93DA7EB35F8BE0B7D</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-9Q2QTKZC-7</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01549.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCPE1549</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9253B076CF7BDC67B92E2EA93DA7EB35F8BE0B7D/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004919 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004919 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9253B076CF7BDC67B92E2EA93DA7EB35F8BE0B7D
|texte= Mechanical anchorage and peri‐implant bone formation of surface‐modified zirconia in minipigs
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |