A Survey of Dentulous and Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts
Identifieur interne : 004795 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004794; suivant : 004796A Survey of Dentulous and Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts
Auteurs : Cole Stockheimer ; Michael P. WaliszewskiSource :
- Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry [ 1496-4155 ] ; 2012-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Complete dentures, Dent, Dent assoc, Dental appearance, Dental education, Dental esthetics, Dental implants, Dentate, Dentate respondents, Dentistry, Dentulous, Dentulous respondent preference, Dentulous respondents, Denture, Denture esthetics, Different denture, Edentulous, Edentulous patient, Edentulous patient preference, Edentulous patient preference stockheimer, Edentulous patients, Edentulous respondent preference, Edentulous respondents, Esthetic, Esthetic concepts, Esthetic preferences, Esthetics, Female figure, Female subject, Guideline, Implant, Male figure, Male subject, Male subjects, Maxillary, Natural arrangement, Natural arrangements, Occlusal, Patient satisfaction, Preference, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Ranking question, Respondent, Restorative dentistry, Stockheimer, Student respondents, Supernormal, Supernormal appearance, Tooth selection, Waliszewski, Waliszewski table, Wiley periodicals.
- Teeft :
- Complete dentures, Dent, Dent assoc, Dental appearance, Dental education, Dental esthetics, Dental implants, Dentate, Dentate respondents, Dentistry, Dentulous, Dentulous respondent preference, Dentulous respondents, Denture, Denture esthetics, Different denture, Edentulous, Edentulous patient, Edentulous patient preference, Edentulous patient preference stockheimer, Edentulous patients, Edentulous respondent preference, Edentulous respondents, Esthetic, Esthetic concepts, Esthetic preferences, Esthetics, Female figure, Female subject, Guideline, Implant, Male figure, Male subject, Male subjects, Maxillary, Natural arrangement, Natural arrangements, Occlusal, Patient satisfaction, Preference, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Ranking question, Respondent, Restorative dentistry, Stockheimer, Student respondents, Supernormal, Supernormal appearance, Tooth selection, Waliszewski, Waliszewski table, Wiley periodicals.
Abstract
Statement of Problem: Most esthetic preference research and anatomical average analysis come from dentulous populations. If edentulous patients have a different preference, application of this data during denture construction is problematic. Purpose: The aim of this survey was to compare dentulous and edentulous respondent preference among three different denture esthetic concepts. Material and Methods: A questionnaire and test booklet of standardized full‐face digital photographs were used. It included three arrangements during maximum smile for six subjects. Dentulous and edentulous respondents were asked questions about their preference among the three randomly ordered concept photographs for each of the six subjects. A total of 167 dentulous and 269 edentulous questionnaires were analyzed descriptively and with Chi‐squared tests to compare the esthetic preference of the respondents. Results: There was no statistically significant difference overall between dentulous and edentulous preference. Respondent preference varied significantly depending upon subject set and gender. Preference data compared closely to previous research. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this survey, dentulous and edentulous respondent preference among the three esthetic concepts was not significantly different. Questionnaire respondents continued to frequently prefer appearances that are far from the anatomical average.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00449.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:902F8E101E66F7B7A26DC62EEF8064C7FD9F5F87Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A Survey of Dentulous and Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts</title><author><name sortKey="Stockheimer, Cole" sort="Stockheimer, Cole" uniqKey="Stockheimer C" first="Cole" last="Stockheimer">Cole Stockheimer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Senior dental student, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Waliszewski, Michael P" sort="Waliszewski, Michael P" uniqKey="Waliszewski M" first="Michael P." last="Waliszewski">Michael P. Waliszewski</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Adjunct Assistant Professor, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: michael.waliszewski@mu.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:902F8E101E66F7B7A26DC62EEF8064C7FD9F5F87</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00449.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/902F8E101E66F7B7A26DC62EEF8064C7FD9F5F87/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004795</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004795</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A Survey of Dentulous and Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts</title><author><name sortKey="Stockheimer, Cole" sort="Stockheimer, Cole" uniqKey="Stockheimer C" first="Cole" last="Stockheimer">Cole Stockheimer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Senior dental student, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Waliszewski, Michael P" sort="Waliszewski, Michael P" uniqKey="Waliszewski M" first="Michael P." last="Waliszewski">Michael P. Waliszewski</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Adjunct Assistant Professor, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: michael.waliszewski@mu.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY</title><idno type="ISSN">1496-4155</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8240</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="112">112</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="124">124</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">13</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-04">2012-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1496-4155</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1496-4155</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent assoc</term><term>Dental appearance</term><term>Dental education</term><term>Dental esthetics</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate respondents</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentulous</term><term>Dentulous respondent preference</term><term>Dentulous respondents</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture esthetics</term><term>Different denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patient</term><term>Edentulous patient preference</term><term>Edentulous patient preference stockheimer</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous respondent preference</term><term>Edentulous respondents</term><term>Esthetic</term><term>Esthetic concepts</term><term>Esthetic preferences</term><term>Esthetics</term><term>Female figure</term><term>Female subject</term><term>Guideline</term><term>Implant</term><term>Male figure</term><term>Male subject</term><term>Male subjects</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Natural arrangement</term><term>Natural arrangements</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Preference</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Ranking question</term><term>Respondent</term><term>Restorative dentistry</term><term>Stockheimer</term><term>Student respondents</term><term>Supernormal</term><term>Supernormal appearance</term><term>Tooth selection</term><term>Waliszewski</term><term>Waliszewski table</term><term>Wiley periodicals</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent assoc</term><term>Dental appearance</term><term>Dental education</term><term>Dental esthetics</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate respondents</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentulous</term><term>Dentulous respondent preference</term><term>Dentulous respondents</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture esthetics</term><term>Different denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patient</term><term>Edentulous patient preference</term><term>Edentulous patient preference stockheimer</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous respondent preference</term><term>Edentulous respondents</term><term>Esthetic</term><term>Esthetic concepts</term><term>Esthetic preferences</term><term>Esthetics</term><term>Female figure</term><term>Female subject</term><term>Guideline</term><term>Implant</term><term>Male figure</term><term>Male subject</term><term>Male subjects</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Natural arrangement</term><term>Natural arrangements</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Preference</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Ranking question</term><term>Respondent</term><term>Restorative dentistry</term><term>Stockheimer</term><term>Student respondents</term><term>Supernormal</term><term>Supernormal appearance</term><term>Tooth selection</term><term>Waliszewski</term><term>Waliszewski table</term><term>Wiley periodicals</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Statement of Problem: Most esthetic preference research and anatomical average analysis come from dentulous populations. If edentulous patients have a different preference, application of this data during denture construction is problematic. Purpose: The aim of this survey was to compare dentulous and edentulous respondent preference among three different denture esthetic concepts. Material and Methods: A questionnaire and test booklet of standardized full‐face digital photographs were used. It included three arrangements during maximum smile for six subjects. Dentulous and edentulous respondents were asked questions about their preference among the three randomly ordered concept photographs for each of the six subjects. A total of 167 dentulous and 269 edentulous questionnaires were analyzed descriptively and with Chi‐squared tests to compare the esthetic preference of the respondents. Results: There was no statistically significant difference overall between dentulous and edentulous preference. Respondent preference varied significantly depending upon subject set and gender. Preference data compared closely to previous research. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this survey, dentulous and edentulous respondent preference among the three esthetic concepts was not significantly different. Questionnaire respondents continued to frequently prefer appearances that are far from the anatomical average.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>dentulous</json:string><json:string>prosthet</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>dentate</json:string><json:string>waliszewski</json:string><json:string>stockheimer</json:string><json:string>wiley periodicals</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>edentulous patient preference stockheimer</json:string><json:string>edentulous respondents</json:string><json:string>restorative dentistry</json:string><json:string>supernormal</json:string><json:string>dentate respondents</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>dentulous respondents</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>dental appearance</json:string><json:string>occlusal</json:string><json:string>guideline</json:string><json:string>natural arrangement</json:string><json:string>supernormal appearance</json:string><json:string>male figure</json:string><json:string>edentulous respondent preference</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>esthetic</json:string><json:string>dental esthetics</json:string><json:string>esthetic concepts</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>female figure</json:string><json:string>preference</json:string><json:string>respondent</json:string><json:string>dentulous respondent preference</json:string><json:string>tooth selection</json:string><json:string>male subject</json:string><json:string>edentulous patient</json:string><json:string>edentulous patient preference</json:string><json:string>denture esthetics</json:string><json:string>esthetics</json:string><json:string>student respondents</json:string><json:string>waliszewski table</json:string><json:string>ranking question</json:string><json:string>female subject</json:string><json:string>dental education</json:string><json:string>male subjects</json:string><json:string>natural arrangements</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>different denture</json:string><json:string>esthetic preferences</json:string><json:string>dent assoc</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>COLE STOCKHEIMER DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Senior dental student, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>MICHAEL P. WALISZEWSKI DDS, MSD</name><affiliations><json:string>Adjunct Assistant Professor, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA</json:string><json:string>E-mail: michael.waliszewski@mu.edu</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>JERD449</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-6DLDQ4F1-5</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Statement of Problem: Most esthetic preference research and anatomical average analysis come from dentulous populations. If edentulous patients have a different preference, application of this data during denture construction is problematic. Purpose: The aim of this survey was to compare dentulous and edentulous respondent preference among three different denture esthetic concepts. Material and Methods: A questionnaire and test booklet of standardized full‐face digital photographs were used. It included three arrangements during maximum smile for six subjects. Dentulous and edentulous respondents were asked questions about their preference among the three randomly ordered concept photographs for each of the six subjects. A total of 167 dentulous and 269 edentulous questionnaires were analyzed descriptively and with Chi‐squared tests to compare the esthetic preference of the respondents. Results: There was no statistically significant difference overall between dentulous and edentulous preference. Respondent preference varied significantly depending upon subject set and gender. Preference data compared closely to previous research. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this survey, dentulous and edentulous respondent preference among the three esthetic concepts was not significantly different. Questionnaire respondents continued to frequently prefer appearances that are far from the anatomical average.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.256</score><pdfWordCount>5017</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>36716</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>13</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585.069 x 782.928 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>188</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1429</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A Survey of Dentulous and Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts</title><pmid><json:string>22524718</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8240</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1496-4155</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8240</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JERD</json:string></publisherId><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>112</first><last>124</last><total>13</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>2006</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Marquette University</json:string><json:string>The Academy of Prosthodontics</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Professor</json:string><json:string>Stockheimer</json:string><json:string>Shor</json:string><json:string>Waliszewski</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Milwaukee</json:string><json:string>Los Angeles</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>WI</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>J Esthet Restor Dent 24:112–125, 2012</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-6DLDQ4F1-5</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00449.x</json:string></doi><id>902F8E101E66F7B7A26DC62EEF8064C7FD9F5F87</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/902F8E101E66F7B7A26DC62EEF8064C7FD9F5F87/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/902F8E101E66F7B7A26DC62EEF8064C7FD9F5F87/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/902F8E101E66F7B7A26DC62EEF8064C7FD9F5F87/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A Survey of Dentulous and Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A Survey of Dentulous and Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts</title><title level="a" type="short">DENTULOUS AND EDENTULOUS PATIENT PREFERENCE</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">COLE</forename><surname>STOCKHEIMER</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Senior dental student, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">MICHAEL P.</forename><surname>WALISZEWSKI</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Adjunct Assistant Professor, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr. Michael P. Waliszewski, DDS, MsD, Greenbrook Prosthodontics, 13780 W. Greenfield Ave #780, Brookfield, WI 53005, USA; Tel.: 262‐782‐4860; Fax: 262‐782‐7720; email: michael.waliszewski@mu.edu</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">902F8E101E66F7B7A26DC62EEF8064C7FD9F5F87</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6DLDQ4F1-5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00449.x</idno><idno type="unit">JERD449</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JERD.JERD449.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY</title><idno type="pISSN">1496-4155</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8240</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8240</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jerd.2012.24.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">JERD</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="112">112</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="124">124</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">13</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main">
ABSTRACT
<p><hi rend="bold">Statement of Problem: </hi> Most esthetic preference research and anatomical average analysis come from dentulous populations. If edentulous patients have a different preference, application of this data during denture construction is problematic.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose: </hi> The aim of this survey was to compare dentulous and edentulous respondent preference among three different denture esthetic concepts.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and Methods: </hi> A questionnaire and test booklet of standardized full‐face digital photographs were used. It included three arrangements during maximum smile for six subjects. Dentulous and edentulous respondents were asked questions about their preference among the three randomly ordered concept photographs for each of the six subjects. A total of 167 dentulous and 269 edentulous questionnaires were analyzed descriptively and with Chi‐squared tests to compare the esthetic preference of the respondents.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> There was no statistically significant difference overall between dentulous and edentulous preference. Respondent preference varied significantly depending upon subject set and gender. Preference data compared closely to previous research.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> Within the limitations of this survey, dentulous and edentulous respondent preference among the three esthetic concepts was not significantly different. Questionnaire respondents continued to frequently prefer appearances that are far from the anatomical average.</p>
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
<p>Dentulous and edentulous patients show a similar esthetic preference. Application of dentulous patient preferences and anatomical averages during edentulous patient treatment is appropriate.</p><p>(J Esthet Restor Dent 24:112–125, 2012)</p></abstract><textClass><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>RESEARCH ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/902F8E101E66F7B7A26DC62EEF8064C7FD9F5F87/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8240</doi><issn type="print">1496-4155</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8240</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JERD"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY">Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jerd.2012.24.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="24">24</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-04">April 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="7" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00449.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JERD449"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="13"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">RESEARCH ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.7 mode:FullText" date="2012-09-21"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-06-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-04-23"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-06-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="112">112</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="124">124</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr. Michael P. Waliszewski, DDS, MsD, Greenbrook Prosthodontics, 13780 W. Greenfield Ave #780, Brookfield, WI 53005, USA; Tel.: 262‐782‐4860; Fax: 262‐782‐7720; email: <email>michael.waliszewski@mu.edu</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JERD.JERD449.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="19"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="7"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="73"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5928"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A Survey of Dentulous and Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts</title><title type="shortAuthors">Stockheimer and Waliszewski</title><title type="short">DENTULOUS AND EDENTULOUS PATIENT PREFERENCE</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>COLE</givenNames><familyName>STOCKHEIMER</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>MICHAEL P.</givenNames><familyName>WALISZEWSKI</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Senior dental student, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Adjunct Assistant Professor, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><section xml:id="abs1-1"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Statement of Problem: </b> Most esthetic preference research and anatomical average analysis come from dentulous populations. If edentulous patients have a different preference, application of this data during denture construction is problematic.</p><p><b>Purpose: </b> The aim of this survey was to compare dentulous and edentulous respondent preference among three different denture esthetic concepts.</p><p><b>Material and Methods: </b> A questionnaire and test booklet of standardized full‐face digital photographs were used. It included three arrangements during maximum smile for six subjects. Dentulous and edentulous respondents were asked questions about their preference among the three randomly ordered concept photographs for each of the six subjects. A total of 167 dentulous and 269 edentulous questionnaires were analyzed descriptively and with Chi‐squared tests to compare the esthetic preference of the respondents.</p><p><b>Results: </b> There was no statistically significant difference overall between dentulous and edentulous preference. Respondent preference varied significantly depending upon subject set and gender. Preference data compared closely to previous research.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> Within the limitations of this survey, dentulous and edentulous respondent preference among the three esthetic concepts was not significantly different. Questionnaire respondents continued to frequently prefer appearances that are far from the anatomical average.</p></section><section xml:id="abs1-2"><title type="main">CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE</title><p>Dentulous and edentulous patients show a similar esthetic preference. Application of dentulous patient preferences and anatomical averages during edentulous patient treatment is appropriate.</p><p>(J Esthet Restor Dent 24:112–125, 2012)</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1"><p>This article is accompanied by commentary, A Survey of Dentulous and Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts, Joseph J. Massad, DDS</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A Survey of Dentulous and Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>DENTULOUS AND EDENTULOUS PATIENT PREFERENCE</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A Survey of Dentulous and Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">COLE</namePart><namePart type="family">STOCKHEIMER</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Senior dental student, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">MICHAEL P.</namePart><namePart type="family">WALISZEWSKI</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSD</namePart><affiliation>Adjunct Assistant Professor, School of Dentistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: michael.waliszewski@mu.edu</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-04</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">19</extent><extent unit="tables">7</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">73</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">5928</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Statement of Problem: Most esthetic preference research and anatomical average analysis come from dentulous populations. If edentulous patients have a different preference, application of this data during denture construction is problematic. Purpose: The aim of this survey was to compare dentulous and edentulous respondent preference among three different denture esthetic concepts. Material and Methods: A questionnaire and test booklet of standardized full‐face digital photographs were used. It included three arrangements during maximum smile for six subjects. Dentulous and edentulous respondents were asked questions about their preference among the three randomly ordered concept photographs for each of the six subjects. A total of 167 dentulous and 269 edentulous questionnaires were analyzed descriptively and with Chi‐squared tests to compare the esthetic preference of the respondents. Results: There was no statistically significant difference overall between dentulous and edentulous preference. Respondent preference varied significantly depending upon subject set and gender. Preference data compared closely to previous research. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this survey, dentulous and edentulous respondent preference among the three esthetic concepts was not significantly different. Questionnaire respondents continued to frequently prefer appearances that are far from the anatomical average.</abstract><abstract>Dentulous and edentulous patients show a similar esthetic preference. Application of dentulous patient preferences and anatomical averages during edentulous patient treatment is appropriate. (J Esthet Restor Dent 24:112–125, 2012)</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1496-4155</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8240</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8240</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JERD</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>24</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>112</start><end>124</end><total>13</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">902F8E101E66F7B7A26DC62EEF8064C7FD9F5F87</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6DLDQ4F1-5</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00449.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JERD449</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/902F8E101E66F7B7A26DC62EEF8064C7FD9F5F87/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004795 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004795 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:902F8E101E66F7B7A26DC62EEF8064C7FD9F5F87
|texte= A Survey of Dentulous and Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |