One‐Year Prospective Evaluation of the Early Loading of Unsplinted Conical Brånemark Fixtures with Mandibular Overdentures Immediately following Surgery
Identifieur interne : 004565 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004564; suivant : 004566One‐Year Prospective Evaluation of the Early Loading of Unsplinted Conical Brånemark Fixtures with Mandibular Overdentures Immediately following Surgery
Auteurs : Alan G. T. Payne ; Andrew Tawse-Smith ; Rohana Kumara ; W. Murray ThomsonSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2001-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment height, Anterior mandible, Ball abutments, Ball attachments, Bicortical anchorage, Bone quantity, Branemark, Brinemark, Brinemark implants, Clin, Clinical dentistry, Clinical implant dentistry, Conical, Conical fixtures, Dent, Dentistry, Denture, Early loading, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Fixture, Immediate loading, Imp1, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant success, Keratinized mucosa, Lekholm, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular implant overdentures, Mandibular overdentures, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Matrix, Maxillofac, Mucosal, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegration, Overdenture, Overdentures, Periotest, Periotest instrument, Periotest values, Postoperative, Postoperatively, Preliminary results, Primary stability, Progressive loading, Prospective evaluation, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Prosthodont, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic treatment, Quintessence, Reference point, Relative attachment level, Respective matrices, Splinted, Study period, Surgical, Tissue conditioner, Titanium implants, Unsplinted, Unsplinted implants, Zarb.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment height, Anterior mandible, Ball abutments, Ball attachments, Bicortical anchorage, Bone quantity, Branemark, Brinemark, Brinemark implants, Clin, Clinical dentistry, Clinical implant dentistry, Conical, Conical fixtures, Dent, Dentistry, Denture, Early loading, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Fixture, Immediate loading, Imp1, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant success, Keratinized mucosa, Lekholm, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular denture, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular implant overdentures, Mandibular overdentures, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Matrix, Maxillofac, Mucosal, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegration, Overdenture, Overdentures, Periotest, Periotest instrument, Periotest values, Postoperative, Postoperatively, Preliminary results, Primary stability, Progressive loading, Prospective evaluation, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Prosthodont, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic treatment, Quintessence, Reference point, Relative attachment level, Respective matrices, Splinted, Study period, Surgical, Tissue conditioner, Titanium implants, Unsplinted, Unsplinted implants, Zarb.
Abstract
Background: Prospective evaluation of the early loading of unsplinted Branemark implants with mandibular over‐dentures opposing conventional dentures is not evident in the implant‐related literature. Purpose: To clinically evaluate progressive and early loading of 20 unsplinted conical Brånemark implants in edentulous mandibles with overdentures. Materials and Methods: Ten edentulous patients all had two conical Brånemark implants placed in the anterior mandible with mandatory primary stability with bicortical anchorage. Ball abutment connection was performed simultaneously. Previously constructed conventional mandibular dentures were temporarily relined with tissue conditioner postoperatively and worn with moderation for the first 2 weeks to allow progressive loading. Early loading of the implants followed after 2 weeks, with inclusion of the respective matrices in the mandibular dentures, using a definitive reline procedure. Results: All patients successfully functioned with their mandibular implant overdentures from 2 to 52 weeks postoperatively. Mean marginal bone loss was within established criteria for success:0.22 mm (SD = 0.48 mm) mesially and 0.30 mm (SD = 0.39 mm) distally on the conical implants. Mobility tests using the Periotest instrument became more negative, although not at statistically significant levels. Difficulties in the management of the peri‐implant mucosa between surgery and loading at 2 weeks were observed in 40% of the patients. Conclusions: These preliminary 1‐year results show that successful early loading of unsplinted conical Brånemark implants with mandibular overdentures is possible.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00124.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:8BDA8F594C2B6434B89128CEDE536A3001728601Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">One‐Year Prospective Evaluation of the Early Loading of Unsplinted Conical Brånemark Fixtures with Mandibular Overdentures Immediately following Surgery</title><author><name sortKey="Payne, Alan G T" sort="Payne, Alan G T" uniqKey="Payne A" first="Alan G. T." last="Payne">Alan G. T. Payne</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: alan.paynedent.otago.ac.nz</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tawse Mith, Andrew" sort="Tawse Mith, Andrew" uniqKey="Tawse Mith A" first="Andrew" last="Tawse-Smith">Andrew Tawse-Smith</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kumara, Rohana" sort="Kumara, Rohana" uniqKey="Kumara R" first="Rohana" last="Kumara">Rohana Kumara</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand and</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Thomson, W Murray" sort="Thomson, W Murray" uniqKey="Thomson W" first="W. Murray" last="Thomson">W. Murray Thomson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8BDA8F594C2B6434B89128CEDE536A3001728601</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00124.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8BDA8F594C2B6434B89128CEDE536A3001728601/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004565</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004565</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">One‐Year Prospective Evaluation of the Early Loading of Unsplinted Conical Brånemark Fixtures with Mandibular Overdentures Immediately following Surgery</title><author><name sortKey="Payne, Alan G T" sort="Payne, Alan G T" uniqKey="Payne A" first="Alan G. T." last="Payne">Alan G. T. Payne</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: alan.paynedent.otago.ac.nz</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tawse Mith, Andrew" sort="Tawse Mith, Andrew" uniqKey="Tawse Mith A" first="Andrew" last="Tawse-Smith">Andrew Tawse-Smith</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kumara, Rohana" sort="Kumara, Rohana" uniqKey="Kumara R" first="Rohana" last="Kumara">Rohana Kumara</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand and</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Thomson, W Murray" sort="Thomson, W Murray" uniqKey="Thomson W" first="W. Murray" last="Thomson">W. Murray Thomson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="9">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="19">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-01">2001-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment height</term><term>Anterior mandible</term><term>Ball abutments</term><term>Ball attachments</term><term>Bicortical anchorage</term><term>Bone quantity</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Brinemark</term><term>Brinemark implants</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Conical</term><term>Conical fixtures</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Fixture</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Imp1</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Keratinized mucosa</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular denture</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular implant overdentures</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Matrix</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Mucosal</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Periotest</term><term>Periotest instrument</term><term>Periotest values</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Postoperatively</term><term>Preliminary results</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Progressive loading</term><term>Prospective evaluation</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Quintessence</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Relative attachment level</term><term>Respective matrices</term><term>Splinted</term><term>Study period</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Tissue conditioner</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Unsplinted</term><term>Unsplinted implants</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment height</term><term>Anterior mandible</term><term>Ball abutments</term><term>Ball attachments</term><term>Bicortical anchorage</term><term>Bone quantity</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Brinemark</term><term>Brinemark implants</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Conical</term><term>Conical fixtures</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Fixture</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Imp1</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Keratinized mucosa</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular denture</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular implant overdentures</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Matrix</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Mucosal</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Periotest</term><term>Periotest instrument</term><term>Periotest values</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Postoperatively</term><term>Preliminary results</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Progressive loading</term><term>Prospective evaluation</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Quintessence</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Relative attachment level</term><term>Respective matrices</term><term>Splinted</term><term>Study period</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Tissue conditioner</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Unsplinted</term><term>Unsplinted implants</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Prospective evaluation of the early loading of unsplinted Branemark implants with mandibular over‐dentures opposing conventional dentures is not evident in the implant‐related literature. Purpose: To clinically evaluate progressive and early loading of 20 unsplinted conical Brånemark implants in edentulous mandibles with overdentures. Materials and Methods: Ten edentulous patients all had two conical Brånemark implants placed in the anterior mandible with mandatory primary stability with bicortical anchorage. Ball abutment connection was performed simultaneously. Previously constructed conventional mandibular dentures were temporarily relined with tissue conditioner postoperatively and worn with moderation for the first 2 weeks to allow progressive loading. Early loading of the implants followed after 2 weeks, with inclusion of the respective matrices in the mandibular dentures, using a definitive reline procedure. Results: All patients successfully functioned with their mandibular implant overdentures from 2 to 52 weeks postoperatively. Mean marginal bone loss was within established criteria for success:0.22 mm (SD = 0.48 mm) mesially and 0.30 mm (SD = 0.39 mm) distally on the conical implants. Mobility tests using the Periotest instrument became more negative, although not at statistically significant levels. Difficulties in the management of the peri‐implant mucosa between surgery and loading at 2 weeks were observed in 40% of the patients. Conclusions: These preliminary 1‐year results show that successful early loading of unsplinted conical Brånemark implants with mandibular overdentures is possible.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>conical</json:string><json:string>brinemark</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>unsplinted</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>imp1</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>mucosal</json:string><json:string>periotest</json:string><json:string>early loading</json:string><json:string>zarb</json:string><json:string>prosthodont</json:string><json:string>postoperatively</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>lekholm</json:string><json:string>postoperative</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>quintessence</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandible</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>splinted</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>ball abutments</json:string><json:string>tissue conditioner</json:string><json:string>progressive loading</json:string><json:string>matrix</json:string><json:string>periotest values</json:string><json:string>mandibular denture</json:string><json:string>mandibular dentures</json:string><json:string>respective matrices</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>brinemark implants</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>relative attachment level</json:string><json:string>implant success</json:string><json:string>mandibular implant overdentures</json:string><json:string>fixture</json:string><json:string>ball attachments</json:string><json:string>bicortical anchorage</json:string><json:string>study period</json:string><json:string>preliminary results</json:string><json:string>conical fixtures</json:string><json:string>periotest instrument</json:string><json:string>prospective evaluation</json:string><json:string>reference point</json:string><json:string>abutment height</json:string><json:string>keratinized mucosa</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic treatment</json:string><json:string>marginal bone levels</json:string><json:string>unsplinted implants</json:string><json:string>anterior mandible</json:string><json:string>bone quantity</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac surg</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>primary stability</json:string><json:string>implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>clinical dentistry</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Alan G.T. Payne BDS, MDent, FCD(SA)</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</json:string><json:string>E-mail: alan.paynedent.otago.ac.nz</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Andrew Tawse‐Smith DDS Cert Perio (Göteborg)</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Rohana Kumara BDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand and</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>W. Murray Thomson BSc, BDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>early loading</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>immediate loading</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mandibular implant overdentures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>progressive loading</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID9</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-ZMMG614V-2</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Prospective evaluation of the early loading of unsplinted Branemark implants with mandibular over‐dentures opposing conventional dentures is not evident in the implant‐related literature. Purpose: To clinically evaluate progressive and early loading of 20 unsplinted conical Brånemark implants in edentulous mandibles with overdentures. Materials and Methods: Ten edentulous patients all had two conical Brånemark implants placed in the anterior mandible with mandatory primary stability with bicortical anchorage. Ball abutment connection was performed simultaneously. Previously constructed conventional mandibular dentures were temporarily relined with tissue conditioner postoperatively and worn with moderation for the first 2 weeks to allow progressive loading. Early loading of the implants followed after 2 weeks, with inclusion of the respective matrices in the mandibular dentures, using a definitive reline procedure. Results: All patients successfully functioned with their mandibular implant overdentures from 2 to 52 weeks postoperatively. Mean marginal bone loss was within established criteria for success:0.22 mm (SD = 0.48 mm) mesially and 0.30 mm (SD = 0.39 mm) distally on the conical implants. Mobility tests using the Periotest instrument became more negative, although not at statistically significant levels. Difficulties in the management of the peri‐implant mucosa between surgery and loading at 2 weeks were observed in 40% of the patients. Conclusions: These preliminary 1‐year results show that successful early loading of unsplinted conical Brånemark implants with mandibular overdentures is possible.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>223</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1643</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><score>9.676</score><pdfWordCount>5852</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>37994</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>One‐Year Prospective Evaluation of the Early Loading of Unsplinted Conical Brånemark Fixtures with Mandibular Overdentures Immediately following Surgery</title><pmid><json:string>11441545</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>9</first><last>19</last><total>11</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2001</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Orion Corporation, Helsinki, Finland</json:string><json:string>Clinical Overdenture Research Project</json:string><json:string>Care</json:string><json:string>Nobel Biocare Australia Pty</json:string><json:string>BC Decker Inc</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Otago Ethics Committee, Dunedin, New Zealand</json:string><json:string>CORP</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago</json:string><json:string>University of Otago</json:string><json:string>Department of Stomatology</json:string><json:string>Research Project</json:string><json:string>Supplies</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand Reprint</json:string><json:string>SPSS Inc.</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Rohana Kumara</json:string><json:string>W. Murray</json:string><json:string>P.O. Box</json:string><json:string>Alan Payne</json:string><json:string>Prospective</json:string><json:string>Andrew Tawse-Smith</json:string><json:string>Bone</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Christchurch</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Australia</json:string><json:string>Konstanz</json:string><json:string>Dunedin</json:string><json:string>Freiberg</json:string><json:string>Norristown</json:string><json:string>Auckland</json:string><json:string>New Zealand</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string><json:string>Sydney</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Lekholm and Zarb, 1985</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-ZMMG614V-2</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - otorhinolaryngologie. stomatologie</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2001</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2001</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00124.x</json:string></doi><id>8BDA8F594C2B6434B89128CEDE536A3001728601</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8BDA8F594C2B6434B89128CEDE536A3001728601/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8BDA8F594C2B6434B89128CEDE536A3001728601/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8BDA8F594C2B6434B89128CEDE536A3001728601/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">One‐Year Prospective Evaluation of the Early Loading of Unsplinted Conical Brånemark Fixtures with Mandibular Overdentures Immediately following Surgery</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-01"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">One‐Year Prospective Evaluation of the Early Loading of Unsplinted Conical Brånemark Fixtures with Mandibular Overdentures Immediately following Surgery</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Alan G.T.</forename><surname>Payne</surname><roleName type="degree">BDS, MDent, FCD(SA)</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand<address><country key="NZ"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests: Alan Payne, BDS, MDent, FCD(SA), Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, P.O. Box 647, Dunedin, New Zealand; e‐mail: alan.paynedent.otago.ac.nz</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Andrew</forename><surname>Tawse‐Smith</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS Cert Perio (Göteborg)</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand<address><country key="NZ"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Rohana</forename><surname>Kumara</surname><roleName type="degree">BDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand and<address><country key="NZ"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">W. Murray</forename><surname>Thomson</surname><roleName type="degree">BSc, BDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand<address><country key="NZ"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">8BDA8F594C2B6434B89128CEDE536A3001728601</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-ZMMG614V-2</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00124.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID9</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID9.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2001.3.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="9">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="19">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-01"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>
<hi rend="italic">Background</hi>: Prospective evaluation of the early loading of unsplinted Branemark implants with mandibular over‐dentures opposing conventional dentures is not evident in the implant‐related literature.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Purpose</hi>: To clinically evaluate progressive and early loading of 20 unsplinted conical Brånemark implants in edentulous mandibles with overdentures.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Materials and Methods</hi>: Ten edentulous patients all had two conical Brånemark implants placed in the anterior mandible with mandatory primary stability with bicortical anchorage. Ball abutment connection was performed simultaneously. Previously constructed conventional mandibular dentures were temporarily relined with tissue conditioner postoperatively and worn with moderation for the first 2 weeks to allow progressive loading. Early loading of the implants followed after 2 weeks, with inclusion of the respective matrices in the mandibular dentures, using a definitive reline procedure.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Results</hi>: All patients successfully functioned with their mandibular implant overdentures from 2 to 52 weeks postoperatively. Mean marginal bone loss was within established criteria for success:0.22 mm (SD = 0.48 mm) mesially and 0.30 mm (SD = 0.39 mm) distally on the conical implants. Mobility tests using the Periotest instrument became more negative, although not at statistically significant levels. Difficulties in the management of the peri‐implant mucosa between surgery and loading at 2 weeks were observed in 40% of the patients.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Conclusions</hi>: These preliminary 1‐year results show that successful early loading of unsplinted conical Brånemark implants with mandibular overdentures is possible.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">early loading</term><term xml:id="k2">immediate loading</term><term xml:id="k3">mandibular implant overdentures</term><term xml:id="k4">progressive loading</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8BDA8F594C2B6434B89128CEDE536A3001728601/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2001.3.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="3">3</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2001-01">January 2001</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0000900" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00124.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID9"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="11"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-04-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-04-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-04-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="9">9</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="19">19</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Reprint requests: Alan Payne, BDS, MDent, FCD(SA), Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, P.O. Box 647, Dunedin, New Zealand; e‐mail: <email>alan.paynedent.otago.ac.nz</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID9.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="86"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">One‐Year Prospective Evaluation of the Early Loading of Unsplinted Conical Brånemark Fixtures with Mandibular Overdentures Immediately following Surgery</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Alan G.T.</givenNames><familyName>Payne</familyName><degrees>BDS, MDent, FCD(SA)</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Andrew</givenNames><familyName>Tawse‐Smith</familyName><degrees>DDS Cert Perio (Göteborg)</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Rohana</givenNames><familyName>Kumara</familyName><degrees>BDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>W. Murray</givenNames><familyName>Thomson</familyName><degrees>BSc, BDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="NZ"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="NZ"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand and</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="NZ"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">early loading</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">immediate loading</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">mandibular implant overdentures</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">progressive loading</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p> <i>Background</i>: Prospective evaluation of the early loading of unsplinted Branemark implants with mandibular over‐dentures opposing conventional dentures is not evident in the implant‐related literature.</p><p> <i>Purpose</i>: To clinically evaluate progressive and early loading of 20 unsplinted conical Brånemark implants in edentulous mandibles with overdentures.</p><p> <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Ten edentulous patients all had two conical Brånemark implants placed in the anterior mandible with mandatory primary stability with bicortical anchorage. Ball abutment connection was performed simultaneously. Previously constructed conventional mandibular dentures were temporarily relined with tissue conditioner postoperatively and worn with moderation for the first 2 weeks to allow progressive loading. Early loading of the implants followed after 2 weeks, with inclusion of the respective matrices in the mandibular dentures, using a definitive reline procedure.</p><p> <i>Results</i>: All patients successfully functioned with their mandibular implant overdentures from 2 to 52 weeks postoperatively. Mean marginal bone loss was within established criteria for success:0.22 mm (SD = 0.48 mm) mesially and 0.30 mm (SD = 0.39 mm) distally on the conical implants. Mobility tests using the Periotest instrument became more negative, although not at statistically significant levels. Difficulties in the management of the peri‐implant mucosa between surgery and loading at 2 weeks were observed in 40% of the patients.</p><p> <i>Conclusions</i>: These preliminary 1‐year results show that successful early loading of unsplinted conical Brånemark implants with mandibular overdentures is possible.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>One‐Year Prospective Evaluation of the Early Loading of Unsplinted Conical Brånemark Fixtures with Mandibular Overdentures Immediately following Surgery</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>One‐Year Prospective Evaluation of the Early Loading of Unsplinted Conical Brånemark Fixtures with Mandibular Overdentures Immediately following Surgery</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Alan G.T.</namePart><namePart type="family">Payne</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">BDS, MDent, FCD(SA)</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: alan.paynedent.otago.ac.nz</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Andrew</namePart><namePart type="family">Tawse‐Smith</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS Cert Perio (Göteborg)</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rohana</namePart><namePart type="family">Kumara</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">BDS</namePart><affiliation>Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand and</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">W. Murray</namePart><namePart type="family">Thomson</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">BSc, BDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">86</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">5</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Background: Prospective evaluation of the early loading of unsplinted Branemark implants with mandibular over‐dentures opposing conventional dentures is not evident in the implant‐related literature. Purpose: To clinically evaluate progressive and early loading of 20 unsplinted conical Brånemark implants in edentulous mandibles with overdentures. Materials and Methods: Ten edentulous patients all had two conical Brånemark implants placed in the anterior mandible with mandatory primary stability with bicortical anchorage. Ball abutment connection was performed simultaneously. Previously constructed conventional mandibular dentures were temporarily relined with tissue conditioner postoperatively and worn with moderation for the first 2 weeks to allow progressive loading. Early loading of the implants followed after 2 weeks, with inclusion of the respective matrices in the mandibular dentures, using a definitive reline procedure. Results: All patients successfully functioned with their mandibular implant overdentures from 2 to 52 weeks postoperatively. Mean marginal bone loss was within established criteria for success:0.22 mm (SD = 0.48 mm) mesially and 0.30 mm (SD = 0.39 mm) distally on the conical implants. Mobility tests using the Periotest instrument became more negative, although not at statistically significant levels. Difficulties in the management of the peri‐implant mucosa between surgery and loading at 2 weeks were observed in 40% of the patients. Conclusions: These preliminary 1‐year results show that successful early loading of unsplinted conical Brånemark implants with mandibular overdentures is possible.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>early loading</topic><topic>immediate loading</topic><topic>mandibular implant overdentures</topic><topic>progressive loading</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2001</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>3</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>9</start><end>19</end><total>11</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">8BDA8F594C2B6434B89128CEDE536A3001728601</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-ZMMG614V-2</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00124.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID9</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8BDA8F594C2B6434B89128CEDE536A3001728601/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004565 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004565 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8BDA8F594C2B6434B89128CEDE536A3001728601
|texte= One‐Year Prospective Evaluation of the Early Loading of Unsplinted Conical Brånemark Fixtures with Mandibular Overdentures Immediately following Surgery
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |