Clinical Experience of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: A 3‐Year Interim Report
Identifieur interne : 004553 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004552; suivant : 004554Clinical Experience of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: A 3‐Year Interim Report
Auteurs : Anders Örtorp ; Torsten JemtSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2002-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Brinemark, Clinical performance, Computer numeric, Control group, Conventional cast frameworks, Edentulous, First year, Fracture, Framework, Implant, Implant treatment, Jemt, Lower jaws, Mandible, Maxilla, Oral maxillofac implants, Original prostheses, Original prosthesis, Osseointegrated implants, Prosthesis, Resin veneer fractures, Test group, Third year, Titanium, Titanium framework, Titanium frameworks, Veneer, Year maxilla mandible.
- Teeft :
- Brinemark, Clinical performance, Computer numeric, Control group, Conventional cast frameworks, Edentulous, First year, Fracture, Framework, Implant, Implant treatment, Jemt, Lower jaws, Mandible, Maxilla, Oral maxillofac implants, Original prostheses, Original prosthesis, Osseointegrated implants, Prosthesis, Resin veneer fractures, Test group, Third year, Titanium, Titanium framework, Titanium frameworks, Veneer, Year maxilla mandible.
Abstract
Background: The use of computer numeric controlled (CNC)‐milled titanium frameworks is a new technique for framework fabrication, and few clinical reports have been made on this treatment modality. Purpose: The goal of this study was to report the clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in the edentulous jaw and to compare the results with prostheses provided with conventional cast frameworks during the first 3 years of function. Materials and Methods: A consecutive group of 126 edentulous patients were provided by random distribution with 67 prostheses with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in 23 upper and 44 lower jaws and 62 conventional prostheses with gold‐alloy castings in 31 upper and 31 lower jaws. Radiographic 1‐year data and clinical 3‐year data were collected for both the titanium and control group. Results: One prosthesis was lost in each group owing to loss of implants, and the overall 3‐year prosthesis cumulative survival rate was 98.2% for both groups. Patients with smoking habits experienced significantly more implant failures than nonsmokers (p =.006). Few problems were observed. No metal fractures were seen in the test group, whereas two frameworks and one abutment screw fractured in the control group. Resin veneer fractures were the most common complication, with a slightly higher incidence observed in the control group. Conclusions: Computer numeric controlled‐milled titanium frameworks can be used as an alternative to conventional castings in the edentulous jaw, presenting clinical performance similar to that of conventional cast frameworks during the first 3 years of function.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00159.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:8BA328DB2BEB6C710F2CEE89CAD8AF6C24CE90D8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical Experience of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: A 3‐Year Interim Report</title><author><name sortKey="Ortorp, Anders" sort="Ortorp, Anders" uniqKey="Ortorp A" first="Anders" last="Örtorp">Anders Örtorp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prosthodontist and Associate Professor, Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: Anders.Ortorp@vgregion.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate Professor, Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8BA328DB2BEB6C710F2CEE89CAD8AF6C24CE90D8</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00159.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8BA328DB2BEB6C710F2CEE89CAD8AF6C24CE90D8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004553</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004553</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical Experience of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: A 3‐Year Interim Report</title><author><name sortKey="Ortorp, Anders" sort="Ortorp, Anders" uniqKey="Ortorp A" first="Anders" last="Örtorp">Anders Örtorp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prosthodontist and Associate Professor, Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: Anders.Ortorp@vgregion.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate Professor, Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="104">104</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="109">109</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-07">2002-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Brinemark</term><term>Clinical performance</term><term>Computer numeric</term><term>Control group</term><term>Conventional cast frameworks</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>First year</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Framework</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Lower jaws</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Original prostheses</term><term>Original prosthesis</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Resin veneer fractures</term><term>Test group</term><term>Third year</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium framework</term><term>Titanium frameworks</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Year maxilla mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Brinemark</term><term>Clinical performance</term><term>Computer numeric</term><term>Control group</term><term>Conventional cast frameworks</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>First year</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Framework</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Lower jaws</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Original prostheses</term><term>Original prosthesis</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Resin veneer fractures</term><term>Test group</term><term>Third year</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium framework</term><term>Titanium frameworks</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Year maxilla mandible</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: The use of computer numeric controlled (CNC)‐milled titanium frameworks is a new technique for framework fabrication, and few clinical reports have been made on this treatment modality. Purpose: The goal of this study was to report the clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in the edentulous jaw and to compare the results with prostheses provided with conventional cast frameworks during the first 3 years of function. Materials and Methods: A consecutive group of 126 edentulous patients were provided by random distribution with 67 prostheses with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in 23 upper and 44 lower jaws and 62 conventional prostheses with gold‐alloy castings in 31 upper and 31 lower jaws. Radiographic 1‐year data and clinical 3‐year data were collected for both the titanium and control group. Results: One prosthesis was lost in each group owing to loss of implants, and the overall 3‐year prosthesis cumulative survival rate was 98.2% for both groups. Patients with smoking habits experienced significantly more implant failures than nonsmokers (p =.006). Few problems were observed. No metal fractures were seen in the test group, whereas two frameworks and one abutment screw fractured in the control group. Resin veneer fractures were the most common complication, with a slightly higher incidence observed in the control group. Conclusions: Computer numeric controlled‐milled titanium frameworks can be used as an alternative to conventional castings in the edentulous jaw, presenting clinical performance similar to that of conventional cast frameworks during the first 3 years of function.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>titanium frameworks</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>jemt</json:string><json:string>test group</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>lower jaws</json:string><json:string>brinemark</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>year maxilla mandible</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>conventional cast frameworks</json:string><json:string>original prosthesis</json:string><json:string>original prostheses</json:string><json:string>clinical performance</json:string><json:string>veneer</json:string><json:string>first year</json:string><json:string>titanium framework</json:string><json:string>resin veneer fractures</json:string><json:string>third year</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>computer numeric</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>framework</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Anders Örtorp LDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Prosthodontist and Associate Professor, Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string><json:string>E-mail: Anders.Ortorp@vgregion.se</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Torsten Jemt LDS, Odont Dr</name><affiliations><json:string>Associate Professor, Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>computer numeric controlled</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant supported</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>prostheses</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>titanium</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID104</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-KVF63KC8-G</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: The use of computer numeric controlled (CNC)‐milled titanium frameworks is a new technique for framework fabrication, and few clinical reports have been made on this treatment modality. Purpose: The goal of this study was to report the clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in the edentulous jaw and to compare the results with prostheses provided with conventional cast frameworks during the first 3 years of function. Materials and Methods: A consecutive group of 126 edentulous patients were provided by random distribution with 67 prostheses with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in 23 upper and 44 lower jaws and 62 conventional prostheses with gold‐alloy castings in 31 upper and 31 lower jaws. Radiographic 1‐year data and clinical 3‐year data were collected for both the titanium and control group. Results: One prosthesis was lost in each group owing to loss of implants, and the overall 3‐year prosthesis cumulative survival rate was 98.2% for both groups. Patients with smoking habits experienced significantly more implant failures than nonsmokers (p =.006). Few problems were observed. No metal fractures were seen in the test group, whereas two frameworks and one abutment screw fractured in the control group. Resin veneer fractures were the most common complication, with a slightly higher incidence observed in the control group. Conclusions: Computer numeric controlled‐milled titanium frameworks can be used as an alternative to conventional castings in the edentulous jaw, presenting clinical performance similar to that of conventional cast frameworks during the first 3 years of function.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>247</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1671</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><score>7.847</score><pdfWordCount>2883</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>18944</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Clinical Experience of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: A 3‐Year Interim Report</title><pmid><json:string>12121610</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>104</first><last>109</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2002</json:string><json:string>between November 1996 and February 1998</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Anders Ortorp</json:string><json:string>Implant</json:string><json:string>MadMan</json:string><json:string>Camilla Billstrom</json:string><json:string>Lost</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-KVF63KC8-G</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2002</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2002</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00159.x</json:string></doi><id>8BA328DB2BEB6C710F2CEE89CAD8AF6C24CE90D8</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8BA328DB2BEB6C710F2CEE89CAD8AF6C24CE90D8/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8BA328DB2BEB6C710F2CEE89CAD8AF6C24CE90D8/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8BA328DB2BEB6C710F2CEE89CAD8AF6C24CE90D8/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Clinical Experience of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: A 3‐Year Interim Report</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical Experience of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: A 3‐Year Interim Report</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Anders</forename><surname>Örtorp</surname><roleName type="degree">LDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Prosthodontist and Associate Professor, Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests: Anders Örtorp, LDS, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Medicinaregatan 12 C, S‐413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden; e‐mail: Anders.Ortorp@vgregion.se</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Torsten</forename><surname>Jemt</surname><roleName type="degree">LDS, Odont Dr</roleName></persName><affiliation>Associate Professor, Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">8BA328DB2BEB6C710F2CEE89CAD8AF6C24CE90D8</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-KVF63KC8-G</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00159.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID104</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID104.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2002.4.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="104">104</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="109">109</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>
<hi rend="italic">Background</hi>: The use of computer numeric controlled (CNC)‐milled titanium frameworks is a new technique for framework fabrication, and few clinical reports have been made on this treatment modality.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Purpose</hi>: The goal of this study was to report the clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in the edentulous jaw and to compare the results with prostheses provided with conventional cast frameworks during the first 3 years of function.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Materials and Methods</hi>: A consecutive group of 126 edentulous patients were provided by random distribution with 67 prostheses with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in 23 upper and 44 lower jaws and 62 conventional prostheses with gold‐alloy castings in 31 upper and 31 lower jaws. Radiographic 1‐year data and clinical 3‐year data were collected for both the titanium and control group.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Results</hi>: One prosthesis was lost in each group owing to loss of implants, and the overall 3‐year prosthesis cumulative survival rate was 98.2% for both groups. Patients with smoking habits experienced significantly more implant failures than nonsmokers (p =.006). Few problems were observed. No metal fractures were seen in the test group, whereas two frameworks and one abutment screw fractured in the control group. Resin veneer fractures were the most common complication, with a slightly higher incidence observed in the control group.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Conclusions</hi>: Computer numeric controlled‐milled titanium frameworks can be used as an alternative to conventional castings in the edentulous jaw, presenting clinical performance similar to that of conventional cast frameworks during the first 3 years of function.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">computer numeric controlled</term><term xml:id="k2">implant supported</term><term xml:id="k3">prostheses</term><term xml:id="k4">titanium</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8BA328DB2BEB6C710F2CEE89CAD8AF6C24CE90D8/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="07002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2002.4.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="4">4</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2002-07">July 2002</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0010400" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00159.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID104"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2006-10-30"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2006-10-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="104">104</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="109">109</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Reprint requests: Anders Örtorp, LDS, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Medicinaregatan 12 C, S‐413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden; e‐mail: <email>Anders.Ortorp@vgregion.se</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID104.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="20"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="3"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Clinical Experience of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: A 3‐Year Interim Report</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Anders</givenNames><familyName>Örtorp</familyName><degrees>LDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Torsten</givenNames><familyName>Jemt</familyName><degrees>LDS, Odont Dr</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Prosthodontist and Associate Professor, Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Associate Professor, Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">computer numeric controlled</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implant supported</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">prostheses</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">titanium</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p> <i>Background</i>: The use of computer numeric controlled (CNC)‐milled titanium frameworks is a new technique for framework fabrication, and few clinical reports have been made on this treatment modality.</p><p> <i>Purpose</i>: The goal of this study was to report the clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in the edentulous jaw and to compare the results with prostheses provided with conventional cast frameworks during the first 3 years of function.</p><p> <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A consecutive group of 126 edentulous patients were provided by random distribution with 67 prostheses with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in 23 upper and 44 lower jaws and 62 conventional prostheses with gold‐alloy castings in 31 upper and 31 lower jaws. Radiographic 1‐year data and clinical 3‐year data were collected for both the titanium and control group.</p><p> <i>Results</i>: One prosthesis was lost in each group owing to loss of implants, and the overall 3‐year prosthesis cumulative survival rate was 98.2% for both groups. Patients with smoking habits experienced significantly more implant failures than nonsmokers (p =.006). Few problems were observed. No metal fractures were seen in the test group, whereas two frameworks and one abutment screw fractured in the control group. Resin veneer fractures were the most common complication, with a slightly higher incidence observed in the control group.</p><p> <i>Conclusions</i>: Computer numeric controlled‐milled titanium frameworks can be used as an alternative to conventional castings in the edentulous jaw, presenting clinical performance similar to that of conventional cast frameworks during the first 3 years of function.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Clinical Experience of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: A 3‐Year Interim Report</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Clinical Experience of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: A 3‐Year Interim Report</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Anders</namePart><namePart type="family">Örtorp</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">LDS</namePart><affiliation>Prosthodontist and Associate Professor, Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: Anders.Ortorp@vgregion.se</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Torsten</namePart><namePart type="family">Jemt</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">LDS, Odont Dr</namePart><affiliation>Associate Professor, Chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-07</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">20</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">3</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Background: The use of computer numeric controlled (CNC)‐milled titanium frameworks is a new technique for framework fabrication, and few clinical reports have been made on this treatment modality. Purpose: The goal of this study was to report the clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in the edentulous jaw and to compare the results with prostheses provided with conventional cast frameworks during the first 3 years of function. Materials and Methods: A consecutive group of 126 edentulous patients were provided by random distribution with 67 prostheses with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in 23 upper and 44 lower jaws and 62 conventional prostheses with gold‐alloy castings in 31 upper and 31 lower jaws. Radiographic 1‐year data and clinical 3‐year data were collected for both the titanium and control group. Results: One prosthesis was lost in each group owing to loss of implants, and the overall 3‐year prosthesis cumulative survival rate was 98.2% for both groups. Patients with smoking habits experienced significantly more implant failures than nonsmokers (p =.006). Few problems were observed. No metal fractures were seen in the test group, whereas two frameworks and one abutment screw fractured in the control group. Resin veneer fractures were the most common complication, with a slightly higher incidence observed in the control group. Conclusions: Computer numeric controlled‐milled titanium frameworks can be used as an alternative to conventional castings in the edentulous jaw, presenting clinical performance similar to that of conventional cast frameworks during the first 3 years of function.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>computer numeric controlled</topic><topic>implant supported</topic><topic>prostheses</topic><topic>titanium</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2002</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>4</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>104</start><end>109</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">8BA328DB2BEB6C710F2CEE89CAD8AF6C24CE90D8</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-KVF63KC8-G</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00159.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID104</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8BA328DB2BEB6C710F2CEE89CAD8AF6C24CE90D8/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004553 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004553 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8BA328DB2BEB6C710F2CEE89CAD8AF6C24CE90D8
|texte= Clinical Experience of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: A 3‐Year Interim Report
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |