Sinus lifting procedure
Identifieur interne : 004521 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004520; suivant : 004522Sinus lifting procedure
Auteurs : Karl-Erik Kahnberg ; Peter Nilsson ; Jan-Michaél Hirsch ; Annika Ekestubbe ; Kerstin GröndahlSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2001-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Alveolar bone, Alveolar process, Alveolar ridge, Arrow heads, Augmentation, Bone graft, Bone grafts, Bone height, Bone transplant, Bone window, Bony window, Cancellous bone, Clin, Cumulative survival rates, Dead space, Dental implants, Dental panorama, Different studies, Edentulous, Endosseous implants, Endosteal implants, First postoperative radiographic examination, Graft, Grafted, Grafted bone, Hueso injertado, Immediate endosseous implants, Impl, Implant, Implant stability, Implant system, Inferior border, Inlay, Inlay graft, Inlay grafts, International journal, Intraoral radiographs, Johansson, Kahnberg, Life table analysis, Line marks, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone level changes, Marginal crest, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Maxillary sinus augmentation, Maxillary sinuses, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial surgery, Months postoperatively, Nobel biocare, Oral impl, Osseointegrated implants, Patient group, Permanent bridges, Postoperative, Postoperative examination, Present study, Previous extent, Prospective study, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic evaluation, Radiographic examination, Radiographic signs, Reference point, Restorative dentistry, Round burr, Scanoraa technique, Sinus, Sinus cavity, Sinus inlay, Sinus mucosa, Sinusitis, Sola fase, Success rate, Surgical, Survival rate, Survival rates, Ternational journal, Time period, Tobacco chemicals, Transplant, Xture, Xture installation, Xture survival, Xtures.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Alveolar bone, Alveolar process, Alveolar ridge, Arrow heads, Augmentation, Bone graft, Bone grafts, Bone height, Bone transplant, Bone window, Bony window, Cancellous bone, Clin, Cumulative survival rates, Dead space, Dental implants, Dental panorama, Different studies, Edentulous, Endosseous implants, Endosteal implants, First postoperative radiographic examination, Graft, Grafted, Grafted bone, Hueso injertado, Immediate endosseous implants, Impl, Implant, Implant stability, Implant system, Inferior border, Inlay, Inlay graft, Inlay grafts, International journal, Intraoral radiographs, Johansson, Kahnberg, Life table analysis, Line marks, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone level changes, Marginal crest, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Maxillary sinus augmentation, Maxillary sinuses, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial surgery, Months postoperatively, Nobel biocare, Oral impl, Osseointegrated implants, Patient group, Permanent bridges, Postoperative, Postoperative examination, Present study, Previous extent, Prospective study, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic evaluation, Radiographic examination, Radiographic signs, Reference point, Restorative dentistry, Round burr, Scanoraa technique, Sinus, Sinus cavity, Sinus inlay, Sinus mucosa, Sinusitis, Sola fase, Success rate, Surgical, Survival rate, Survival rates, Ternational journal, Time period, Tobacco chemicals, Transplant, Xture, Xture installation, Xture survival, Xtures.
Abstract
Abstract: A prospective study of one‐stage surgery with intrasinus bone transplant and implants has been performed in 26 patients (13 males and 13 females). The aim of the study was to evaluate the success rate with the one‐stage sinus lifting procedure in patients with a need for bony augmentation of the alveolar process. Fifteen patients were partially dentate and 11 edentulous. The mean height of the alveolar ridge was 2.5 mm preoperatively (range 1–5.5 mm). 126 fixtures were inserted, 93 in grafted bone and 33 in alveolar bone. Twenty‐two patients have been followed for three years, 21 for four years and 11 for five years. The clinical overall survival rate was 69.6% although only 61.2% in grafted bone. Ten of the patients had varying degree of sinusitis post‐fixture installation. At the end of the study, 23 patients had permanent bridges. The survival rate was low for inlay supported implants when the one‐stage surgical technique was applied. Two‐stage surgery may be a safer method.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120508.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:8AFF836F330DDEB19A814370230EBBA64F2497D7Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Sinus lifting procedure</title><author><name sortKey="Kahnberg, Karl Rik" sort="Kahnberg, Karl Rik" uniqKey="Kahnberg K" first="Karl-Erik" last="Kahnberg">Karl-Erik Kahnberg</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: k‐e_kahnberg@odontologi.gu.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nilsson, Peter" sort="Nilsson, Peter" uniqKey="Nilsson P" first="Peter" last="Nilsson">Peter Nilsson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hirsch, Jan Ichael" sort="Hirsch, Jan Ichael" uniqKey="Hirsch J" first="Jan-Michaél" last="Hirsch">Jan-Michaél Hirsch</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ekestubbe, Annika" sort="Ekestubbe, Annika" uniqKey="Ekestubbe A" first="Annika" last="Ekestubbe">Annika Ekestubbe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grondahl, Kerstin" sort="Grondahl, Kerstin" uniqKey="Grondahl K" first="Kerstin" last="Gröndahl">Kerstin Gröndahl</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8AFF836F330DDEB19A814370230EBBA64F2497D7</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120508.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8AFF836F330DDEB19A814370230EBBA64F2497D7/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004521</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004521</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Sinus lifting procedure</title><author><name sortKey="Kahnberg, Karl Rik" sort="Kahnberg, Karl Rik" uniqKey="Kahnberg K" first="Karl-Erik" last="Kahnberg">Karl-Erik Kahnberg</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: k‐e_kahnberg@odontologi.gu.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nilsson, Peter" sort="Nilsson, Peter" uniqKey="Nilsson P" first="Peter" last="Nilsson">Peter Nilsson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hirsch, Jan Ichael" sort="Hirsch, Jan Ichael" uniqKey="Hirsch J" first="Jan-Michaél" last="Hirsch">Jan-Michaél Hirsch</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ekestubbe, Annika" sort="Ekestubbe, Annika" uniqKey="Ekestubbe A" first="Annika" last="Ekestubbe">Annika Ekestubbe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grondahl, Kerstin" sort="Grondahl, Kerstin" uniqKey="Grondahl K" first="Kerstin" last="Gröndahl">Kerstin Gröndahl</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="479">479</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="487">487</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-10">2001-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Alveolar bone</term><term>Alveolar process</term><term>Alveolar ridge</term><term>Arrow heads</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Bone graft</term><term>Bone grafts</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone transplant</term><term>Bone window</term><term>Bony window</term><term>Cancellous bone</term><term>Clin</term><term>Cumulative survival rates</term><term>Dead space</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental panorama</term><term>Different studies</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Endosteal implants</term><term>First postoperative radiographic examination</term><term>Graft</term><term>Grafted</term><term>Grafted bone</term><term>Hueso injertado</term><term>Immediate endosseous implants</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Inferior border</term><term>Inlay</term><term>Inlay graft</term><term>Inlay grafts</term><term>International journal</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>Johansson</term><term>Kahnberg</term><term>Life table analysis</term><term>Line marks</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone level changes</term><term>Marginal crest</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillary sinus augmentation</term><term>Maxillary sinuses</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Months postoperatively</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Patient group</term><term>Permanent bridges</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Postoperative examination</term><term>Present study</term><term>Previous extent</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic evaluation</term><term>Radiographic examination</term><term>Radiographic signs</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Restorative dentistry</term><term>Round burr</term><term>Scanoraa technique</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Sinus cavity</term><term>Sinus inlay</term><term>Sinus mucosa</term><term>Sinusitis</term><term>Sola fase</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Ternational journal</term><term>Time period</term><term>Tobacco chemicals</term><term>Transplant</term><term>Xture</term><term>Xture installation</term><term>Xture survival</term><term>Xtures</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Alveolar bone</term><term>Alveolar process</term><term>Alveolar ridge</term><term>Arrow heads</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Bone graft</term><term>Bone grafts</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone transplant</term><term>Bone window</term><term>Bony window</term><term>Cancellous bone</term><term>Clin</term><term>Cumulative survival rates</term><term>Dead space</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental panorama</term><term>Different studies</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Endosteal implants</term><term>First postoperative radiographic examination</term><term>Graft</term><term>Grafted</term><term>Grafted bone</term><term>Hueso injertado</term><term>Immediate endosseous implants</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Inferior border</term><term>Inlay</term><term>Inlay graft</term><term>Inlay grafts</term><term>International journal</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>Johansson</term><term>Kahnberg</term><term>Life table analysis</term><term>Line marks</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone level changes</term><term>Marginal crest</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillary sinus augmentation</term><term>Maxillary sinuses</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Months postoperatively</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Patient group</term><term>Permanent bridges</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Postoperative examination</term><term>Present study</term><term>Previous extent</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic evaluation</term><term>Radiographic examination</term><term>Radiographic signs</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Restorative dentistry</term><term>Round burr</term><term>Scanoraa technique</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Sinus cavity</term><term>Sinus inlay</term><term>Sinus mucosa</term><term>Sinusitis</term><term>Sola fase</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Ternational journal</term><term>Time period</term><term>Tobacco chemicals</term><term>Transplant</term><term>Xture</term><term>Xture installation</term><term>Xture survival</term><term>Xtures</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: A prospective study of one‐stage surgery with intrasinus bone transplant and implants has been performed in 26 patients (13 males and 13 females). The aim of the study was to evaluate the success rate with the one‐stage sinus lifting procedure in patients with a need for bony augmentation of the alveolar process. Fifteen patients were partially dentate and 11 edentulous. The mean height of the alveolar ridge was 2.5 mm preoperatively (range 1–5.5 mm). 126 fixtures were inserted, 93 in grafted bone and 33 in alveolar bone. Twenty‐two patients have been followed for three years, 21 for four years and 11 for five years. The clinical overall survival rate was 69.6% although only 61.2% in grafted bone. Ten of the patients had varying degree of sinusitis post‐fixture installation. At the end of the study, 23 patients had permanent bridges. The survival rate was low for inlay supported implants when the one‐stage surgical technique was applied. Two‐stage surgery may be a safer method.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>xtures</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>sinus</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>xture</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>graft</json:string><json:string>inlay</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>kahnberg</json:string><json:string>maxillary sinus</json:string><json:string>grafted</json:string><json:string>sinusitis</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>bone transplant</json:string><json:string>grafted bone</json:string><json:string>bone graft</json:string><json:string>augmentation</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>postoperative</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>johansson</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>alveolar bone</json:string><json:string>xture installation</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>survival rates</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>sinus cavity</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>implant stability</json:string><json:string>radiographic signs</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>scanoraa technique</json:string><json:string>patient group</json:string><json:string>cumulative survival rates</json:string><json:string>life table analysis</json:string><json:string>transplant</json:string><json:string>arrow heads</json:string><json:string>radiographic examination</json:string><json:string>postoperative examination</json:string><json:string>reference point</json:string><json:string>maxillary sinuses</json:string><json:string>months postoperatively</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>alveolar ridge</json:string><json:string>sinus inlay</json:string><json:string>inlay grafts</json:string><json:string>sola fase</json:string><json:string>maxillary sinus augmentation</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>inlay graft</json:string><json:string>bony window</json:string><json:string>implant system</json:string><json:string>round burr</json:string><json:string>marginal crest</json:string><json:string>first postoperative radiographic examination</json:string><json:string>different studies</json:string><json:string>inferior border</json:string><json:string>line marks</json:string><json:string>previous extent</json:string><json:string>cancellous bone</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>permanent bridges</json:string><json:string>bone window</json:string><json:string>alveolar process</json:string><json:string>dead space</json:string><json:string>bone grafts</json:string><json:string>success rate</json:string><json:string>time period</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level changes</json:string><json:string>sinus mucosa</json:string><json:string>bone height</json:string><json:string>tobacco chemicals</json:string><json:string>dental panorama</json:string><json:string>hueso injertado</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>intraoral radiographs</json:string><json:string>radiographic evaluation</json:string><json:string>ternational journal</json:string><json:string>immediate endosseous implants</json:string><json:string>endosseous implants</json:string><json:string>xture survival</json:string><json:string>restorative dentistry</json:string><json:string>endosteal implants</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Karl‐Erik Kahnberg</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</json:string><json:string>E-mail: k‐e_kahnberg@odontologi.gu.se</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Peter Nilsson</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jan‐Michaél Hirsch</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</json:string><json:string>Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Annika Ekestubbe</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Kerstin Gröndahl</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>transplant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sinus lifting</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>intrasinus implant</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR120508</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-SVP33DVK-8</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: A prospective study of one‐stage surgery with intrasinus bone transplant and implants has been performed in 26 patients (13 males and 13 females). The aim of the study was to evaluate the success rate with the one‐stage sinus lifting procedure in patients with a need for bony augmentation of the alveolar process. Fifteen patients were partially dentate and 11 edentulous. The mean height of the alveolar ridge was 2.5 mm preoperatively (range 1–5.5 mm). 126 fixtures were inserted, 93 in grafted bone and 33 in alveolar bone. Twenty‐two patients have been followed for three years, 21 for four years and 11 for five years. The clinical overall survival rate was 69.6% although only 61.2% in grafted bone. Ten of the patients had varying degree of sinusitis post‐fixture installation. At the end of the study, 23 patients had permanent bridges. The survival rate was low for inlay supported implants when the one‐stage surgical technique was applied. Two‐stage surgery may be a safer method.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.931</score><pdfWordCount>4975</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>31702</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 794 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>163</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1002</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Sinus lifting procedure</title><pmid><json:string>11564108</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>479</first><last>487</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>period January 1992 through December 1995</json:string><json:string>1</json:string><json:string>2001</json:string><json:string>8139</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Orion Corporation, Helsinki, Finland</json:string><json:string>Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden Correspondence</json:string><json:string>Odontology Göteborg University</json:string><json:string>Göteborg Sweden Tel</json:string><json:string>Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester</json:string><json:string>Ethics Committee of Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology</json:string><json:string>Göteborg University</json:string><json:string>Dental Clinics</json:string><json:string>Sweden Jan-Michael Hirsch, Department of Surgical</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Peter Nilsson</json:string><json:string>Faculty</json:string><json:string>Annika Ekestubbe</json:string><json:string>H. Jr</json:string><json:string>Department</json:string><json:string>Jan-Michael Hirsch</json:string><json:string>Karl-Erik Kahnberg</json:string><json:string>Recent</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Freiberg</json:string><json:string>America</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Albrektsson et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Tidwell et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Gröndahl et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Smiler et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Hürzeler et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Bain & Moy 1993</json:string><json:string>Kahnberg et al</json:string><json:string>Adell et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Ueda & Kaneda 1992</json:string><json:string>Isaksson 1994</json:string><json:string>Johansson et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Quiney et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Tatum 1986</json:string><json:string>Keller et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Rasmusson et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Johansson et al. (1999)</json:string><json:string>Kenney et al. 1977</json:string><json:string>Blomqvist et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Jensen et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Gröndahl & Lekholm, 1997</json:string><json:string>Small et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Miyajima (1990)</json:string><json:string>Daelemans et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Blomquist et al. 1996</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-SVP33DVK-8</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2001</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2001</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120508.x</json:string></doi><id>8AFF836F330DDEB19A814370230EBBA64F2497D7</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8AFF836F330DDEB19A814370230EBBA64F2497D7/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8AFF836F330DDEB19A814370230EBBA64F2497D7/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8AFF836F330DDEB19A814370230EBBA64F2497D7/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Sinus lifting procedure</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Sinus lifting procedure</title><title level="a" type="sub">I. One‐stage surgery with bone transplant and implants</title><title level="a" type="short">Sinus lifting procedure</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Karl‐Erik</forename><surname>Kahnberg</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</affiliation><affiliation>
*Karl‐Erik Kahnberg, DDS, PhD,
Professor and Chairman
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Faculty of Odontology
Göteborg University
Box 450, SE 405 30 Göteborg
Sweden
Tel: +46 31 773 3200
Fax: +46 31 826 091
e‐mail: k‐e_kahnberg@odontologi.gu.se</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Peter</forename><surname>Nilsson</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Jan‐Michaél</forename><surname>Hirsch</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Annika</forename><surname>Ekestubbe</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Kerstin</forename><surname>Gröndahl</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">8AFF836F330DDEB19A814370230EBBA64F2497D7</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SVP33DVK-8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120508.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR120508</idno><idno type="supplier">clr10o651</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR120508.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2001.12.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="479">479</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="487">487</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract:</hi> A prospective study of one‐stage surgery with intrasinus bone transplant and implants has been performed in 26 patients (13 males and 13 females). The aim of the study was to evaluate the success rate with the one‐stage sinus lifting procedure in patients with a need for bony augmentation of the alveolar process. Fifteen patients were partially dentate and 11 edentulous. The mean height of the alveolar ridge was 2.5 mm preoperatively (range 1–5.5 mm). 126 fixtures were inserted, 93 in grafted bone and 33 in alveolar bone. Twenty‐two patients have been followed for three years, 21 for four years and 11 for five years. The clinical overall survival rate was 69.6% although only 61.2% in grafted bone. Ten of the patients had varying degree of sinusitis post‐fixture installation. At the end of the study, 23 patients had permanent bridges. The survival rate was low for inlay supported implants when the one‐stage surgical technique was applied. Two‐stage surgery may be a safer method.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="fr" style="main"><head>Résumé</head><p>Une étude prospective d’une chirurgie en une étape avec un transplant osseux intrasinusal et des implants a été effectuée chez 26 patients (treize hommes et treize femmes). Le but de cette étude a été d’évaluer le taux de succès dans un processus d’épaississement du plancher sinusal en une étape chez des patients qui nécessitaient un épaississement osseux du processus alvéolaire. Quinze patients étaient partiellement édentés et onze édentés. La hauteur osseuse restante était de 2.5 mm avant l’opération (1–5.5 mm). Cent vingt‐six implants ont été insérés, 93 dans l’os greffé et 33 dans l’os alvéolaire. Vingt‐deux patients ont été suivis pendant trois années, 21 pendant quatre années et onze pendant cinq ans. Le taux de survie général clinique était de 70% bien que seulement de 61% dans l’os greffé. Dix des patients avaient un degré variable de sinusite après le placement des implants. A la fin de l’étude, 20 patients ont pû obtenir des bridges permanents. Le taux de survie était bas pour les implants appuyés sur inlay lorsque la technique de chirurgie était effectuée en une étape. La chirurgie en deux étapes semblerait une méthode plus sûre.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="de" style="main"><head>Zusammenfassung</head><p>Bei 26 Patienten (13 männliche und 13 weibliche) wurde eine prospektive Studie über die Anhebung des Sinus durchgeführt, bei welcher in einem einzigen chirurigischen Eingriff ein Knochentransplantat in den Sinus eingebracht und Implantate eingesetzt wurden. Es war das Ziel der Studie, die Erfolgsrate der Anhebung des Sinus in einem einzigen chirurgischen Eingriff bei Patienten, welche eine Augmentation des Alveolarfortsatzes benötigten, zu untersuchen. Fünfzehn Patienten waren teilbezaht und 11 waren zahnlos. Die mittere Höhe des Alveolarfortsatzes betrug vor der Operation 2.5 mm (Bandbreite 1–5.5 mm). Es wurden insgesamt 126 Implantate eingesetzt, 93 davon in transplantierten Knochen und 33 in bestehenden Alveolarknochen. Zweiundzwanzig Patienten konnten über 3 Jahre, 21 über 4 Jahre und 11 über 5 Jahre nachuntersucht werden. Die gesamte klinische Ueberlebensrate der Implantate betrug 69.6%, während die Ueberlebensrate im transplantierten Knochen lediglich 61.2% erreichte. Zehn der Patienten litten nach der Implantation an unterschiedlich ausgeprägten Sinusitiden. Beim Abschluss der Studie trugen 20 Patienten festsitzende Rekonstruktionen. Die Ueberlebensrate für die im Transplantat verankerten Implantate war tief, wenn die Behandlung in einem einzigen chirurgischen Eingriff durchgeführt wurde. Das Vorgehen in zwei chirurgischen Eingriffen könnte die sicherere Methode darstellen.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="es" style="main"><head>Resumen</head><p>Se llevó a cabo un estudio prospectivo de cirurgía de una sola fase con transplante de hueso intrasinusal e implantes en 26 pacientes (13 varones y 13 hembras). La intención del estudio fue evaluar el índice de éxito con el procedimiento de elevación del seno en una sola fase en pacientes con necesidad de aumento del proceso alveolar. Quince pacientes estaban parcialmente dentados y 11 edéntulos. La altura media de la cresta alveolar fue de 2.5 mm preoperatoriamente (rango 1–5.5 mm). Se insertaron 126 fijaciones, 93 en hueso injertado y 33 en hueso alveolar. Veintidós pacientes han sido seguidos durante tres años, 21 durante cuatro años y 11 durante cinco años. El indice total de supervivencia clínica fue del 69.6% aunque solo 61.2% en hueso injertado. Diez de los pacientes tuvieron diversos grados de sinusitis tras la instalación de la fijación. Al final del estudio 20 pacientes tenían puentes permanentes. El índice de supervivencia fue bajo para implantes colocados aplicando la técnica quirúrgica de una sola fase. La cirugía de dos fases puede ser un método mas seguro.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implants</term><term xml:id="k2">bone</term><term xml:id="k3">transplant</term><term xml:id="k4">sinus lifting</term><term xml:id="k5">intrasinus implant</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8AFF836F330DDEB19A814370230EBBA64F2497D7/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10005"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2001.12.issue-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="12">12</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2001-10">October 2001</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0047900" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120508.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR120508"></id><id type="supplier" value="clr10o651"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-07-07"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-07-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="479">479</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="487">487</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>
*<i>Karl‐Erik Kahnberg</i>, DDS, PhD,
Professor and Chairman
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Faculty of Odontology
Göteborg University
Box 450, SE 405 30 Göteborg
Sweden
Tel: +46 31 773 3200
Fax: +46 31 826 091
e‐mail: <email normalForm="k-e_kahnberg@odontologi.gu.se">k‐e_kahnberg@odontologi.gu.se</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR120508.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date: </b> Accepted 18 September 2000</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="7"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="29"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5470"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="23"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="1"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Sinus lifting procedure</title><title type="subtitle">I. One‐stage surgery with bone transplant and implants</title><title type="shortAuthors">Kahnberg et al</title><title type="short">Sinus lifting procedure</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Karl‐Erik</givenNames><familyName>Kahnberg</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Peter</givenNames><familyName>Nilsson</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1 #a3"><personName><givenNames>Jan‐Michaél</givenNames><familyName>Hirsch</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Annika</givenNames><familyName>Ekestubbe</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Kerstin</givenNames><familyName>Gröndahl</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">bone</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">transplant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">sinus lifting</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">intrasinus implant</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract:</b> A prospective study of one‐stage surgery with intrasinus bone transplant and implants has been performed in 26 patients (13 males and 13 females). The aim of the study was to evaluate the success rate with the one‐stage sinus lifting procedure in patients with a need for bony augmentation of the alveolar process. Fifteen patients were partially dentate and 11 edentulous. The mean height of the alveolar ridge was 2.5 mm preoperatively (range 1–5.5 mm). 126 fixtures were inserted, 93 in grafted bone and 33 in alveolar bone. Twenty‐two patients have been followed for three years, 21 for four years and 11 for five years. The clinical overall survival rate was 69.6% although only 61.2% in grafted bone. Ten of the patients had varying degree of sinusitis post‐fixture installation. At the end of the study, 23 patients had permanent bridges. The survival rate was low for inlay supported implants when the one‐stage surgical technique was applied. Two‐stage surgery may be a safer method.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="fr"><title type="main">Résumé</title><p>Une étude prospective d’une chirurgie en une étape avec un transplant osseux intrasinusal et des implants a été effectuée chez 26 patients (treize hommes et treize femmes). Le but de cette étude a été d’évaluer le taux de succès dans un processus d’épaississement du plancher sinusal en une étape chez des patients qui nécessitaient un épaississement osseux du processus alvéolaire. Quinze patients étaient partiellement édentés et onze édentés. La hauteur osseuse restante était de 2.5 mm avant l’opération (1–5.5 mm). Cent vingt‐six implants ont été insérés, 93 dans l’os greffé et 33 dans l’os alvéolaire. Vingt‐deux patients ont été suivis pendant trois années, 21 pendant quatre années et onze pendant cinq ans. Le taux de survie général clinique était de 70% bien que seulement de 61% dans l’os greffé. Dix des patients avaient un degré variable de sinusite après le placement des implants. A la fin de l’étude, 20 patients ont pû obtenir des bridges permanents. Le taux de survie était bas pour les implants appuyés sur inlay lorsque la technique de chirurgie était effectuée en une étape. La chirurgie en deux étapes semblerait une méthode plus sûre.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="de"><title type="main">Zusammenfassung</title><p>Bei 26 Patienten (13 männliche und 13 weibliche) wurde eine prospektive Studie über die Anhebung des Sinus durchgeführt, bei welcher in einem einzigen chirurigischen Eingriff ein Knochentransplantat in den Sinus eingebracht und Implantate eingesetzt wurden. Es war das Ziel der Studie, die Erfolgsrate der Anhebung des Sinus in einem einzigen chirurgischen Eingriff bei Patienten, welche eine Augmentation des Alveolarfortsatzes benötigten, zu untersuchen. Fünfzehn Patienten waren teilbezaht und 11 waren zahnlos. Die mittere Höhe des Alveolarfortsatzes betrug vor der Operation 2.5 mm (Bandbreite 1–5.5 mm). Es wurden insgesamt 126 Implantate eingesetzt, 93 davon in transplantierten Knochen und 33 in bestehenden Alveolarknochen. Zweiundzwanzig Patienten konnten über 3 Jahre, 21 über 4 Jahre und 11 über 5 Jahre nachuntersucht werden. Die gesamte klinische Ueberlebensrate der Implantate betrug 69.6%, während die Ueberlebensrate im transplantierten Knochen lediglich 61.2% erreichte. Zehn der Patienten litten nach der Implantation an unterschiedlich ausgeprägten Sinusitiden. Beim Abschluss der Studie trugen 20 Patienten festsitzende Rekonstruktionen. Die Ueberlebensrate für die im Transplantat verankerten Implantate war tief, wenn die Behandlung in einem einzigen chirurgischen Eingriff durchgeführt wurde. Das Vorgehen in zwei chirurgischen Eingriffen könnte die sicherere Methode darstellen.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="es"><title type="main">Resumen</title><p>Se llevó a cabo un estudio prospectivo de cirurgía de una sola fase con transplante de hueso intrasinusal e implantes en 26 pacientes (13 varones y 13 hembras). La intención del estudio fue evaluar el índice de éxito con el procedimiento de elevación del seno en una sola fase en pacientes con necesidad de aumento del proceso alveolar. Quince pacientes estaban parcialmente dentados y 11 edéntulos. La altura media de la cresta alveolar fue de 2.5 mm preoperatoriamente (rango 1–5.5 mm). Se insertaron 126 fijaciones, 93 en hueso injertado y 33 en hueso alveolar. Veintidós pacientes han sido seguidos durante tres años, 21 durante cuatro años y 11 durante cinco años. El indice total de supervivencia clínica fue del 69.6% aunque solo 61.2% en hueso injertado. Diez de los pacientes tuvieron diversos grados de sinusitis tras la instalación de la fijación. Al final del estudio 20 pacientes tenían puentes permanentes. El índice de supervivencia fue bajo para implantes colocados aplicando la técnica quirúrgica de una sola fase. La cirugía de dos fases puede ser un método mas seguro.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Sinus lifting procedure</title><subTitle>I. One‐stage surgery with bone transplant and implants</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Sinus lifting procedure</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Sinus lifting procedure</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Karl‐Erik</namePart><namePart type="family">Kahnberg</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: k‐e_kahnberg@odontologi.gu.se</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Peter</namePart><namePart type="family">Nilsson</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jan‐Michaél</namePart><namePart type="family">Hirsch</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Annika</namePart><namePart type="family">Ekestubbe</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kerstin</namePart><namePart type="family">Gröndahl</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-10</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 18 September 2000</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">7</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">29</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">1</extent><extent unit="words">5470</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract: A prospective study of one‐stage surgery with intrasinus bone transplant and implants has been performed in 26 patients (13 males and 13 females). The aim of the study was to evaluate the success rate with the one‐stage sinus lifting procedure in patients with a need for bony augmentation of the alveolar process. Fifteen patients were partially dentate and 11 edentulous. The mean height of the alveolar ridge was 2.5 mm preoperatively (range 1–5.5 mm). 126 fixtures were inserted, 93 in grafted bone and 33 in alveolar bone. Twenty‐two patients have been followed for three years, 21 for four years and 11 for five years. The clinical overall survival rate was 69.6% although only 61.2% in grafted bone. Ten of the patients had varying degree of sinusitis post‐fixture installation. At the end of the study, 23 patients had permanent bridges. The survival rate was low for inlay supported implants when the one‐stage surgical technique was applied. Two‐stage surgery may be a safer method.</abstract><abstract lang="fr">Une étude prospective d’une chirurgie en une étape avec un transplant osseux intrasinusal et des implants a été effectuée chez 26 patients (treize hommes et treize femmes). Le but de cette étude a été d’évaluer le taux de succès dans un processus d’épaississement du plancher sinusal en une étape chez des patients qui nécessitaient un épaississement osseux du processus alvéolaire. Quinze patients étaient partiellement édentés et onze édentés. La hauteur osseuse restante était de 2.5 mm avant l’opération (1–5.5 mm). Cent vingt‐six implants ont été insérés, 93 dans l’os greffé et 33 dans l’os alvéolaire. Vingt‐deux patients ont été suivis pendant trois années, 21 pendant quatre années et onze pendant cinq ans. Le taux de survie général clinique était de 70% bien que seulement de 61% dans l’os greffé. Dix des patients avaient un degré variable de sinusite après le placement des implants. A la fin de l’étude, 20 patients ont pû obtenir des bridges permanents. Le taux de survie était bas pour les implants appuyés sur inlay lorsque la technique de chirurgie était effectuée en une étape. La chirurgie en deux étapes semblerait une méthode plus sûre.</abstract><abstract lang="de">Bei 26 Patienten (13 männliche und 13 weibliche) wurde eine prospektive Studie über die Anhebung des Sinus durchgeführt, bei welcher in einem einzigen chirurigischen Eingriff ein Knochentransplantat in den Sinus eingebracht und Implantate eingesetzt wurden. Es war das Ziel der Studie, die Erfolgsrate der Anhebung des Sinus in einem einzigen chirurgischen Eingriff bei Patienten, welche eine Augmentation des Alveolarfortsatzes benötigten, zu untersuchen. Fünfzehn Patienten waren teilbezaht und 11 waren zahnlos. Die mittere Höhe des Alveolarfortsatzes betrug vor der Operation 2.5 mm (Bandbreite 1–5.5 mm). Es wurden insgesamt 126 Implantate eingesetzt, 93 davon in transplantierten Knochen und 33 in bestehenden Alveolarknochen. Zweiundzwanzig Patienten konnten über 3 Jahre, 21 über 4 Jahre und 11 über 5 Jahre nachuntersucht werden. Die gesamte klinische Ueberlebensrate der Implantate betrug 69.6%, während die Ueberlebensrate im transplantierten Knochen lediglich 61.2% erreichte. Zehn der Patienten litten nach der Implantation an unterschiedlich ausgeprägten Sinusitiden. Beim Abschluss der Studie trugen 20 Patienten festsitzende Rekonstruktionen. Die Ueberlebensrate für die im Transplantat verankerten Implantate war tief, wenn die Behandlung in einem einzigen chirurgischen Eingriff durchgeführt wurde. Das Vorgehen in zwei chirurgischen Eingriffen könnte die sicherere Methode darstellen.</abstract><abstract lang="es">Se llevó a cabo un estudio prospectivo de cirurgía de una sola fase con transplante de hueso intrasinusal e implantes en 26 pacientes (13 varones y 13 hembras). La intención del estudio fue evaluar el índice de éxito con el procedimiento de elevación del seno en una sola fase en pacientes con necesidad de aumento del proceso alveolar. Quince pacientes estaban parcialmente dentados y 11 edéntulos. La altura media de la cresta alveolar fue de 2.5 mm preoperatoriamente (rango 1–5.5 mm). Se insertaron 126 fijaciones, 93 en hueso injertado y 33 en hueso alveolar. Veintidós pacientes han sido seguidos durante tres años, 21 durante cuatro años y 11 durante cinco años. El indice total de supervivencia clínica fue del 69.6% aunque solo 61.2% en hueso injertado. Diez de los pacientes tuvieron diversos grados de sinusitis tras la instalación de la fijación. Al final del estudio 20 pacientes tenían puentes permanentes. El índice de supervivencia fue bajo para implantes colocados aplicando la técnica quirúrgica de una sola fase. La cirugía de dos fases puede ser un método mas seguro.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implants</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>transplant</topic><topic>sinus lifting</topic><topic>intrasinus implant</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2001</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>12</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>479</start><end>487</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">8AFF836F330DDEB19A814370230EBBA64F2497D7</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SVP33DVK-8</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120508.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR120508</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8AFF836F330DDEB19A814370230EBBA64F2497D7/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004521 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004521 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8AFF836F330DDEB19A814370230EBBA64F2497D7
|texte= Sinus lifting procedure
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |