The effect of dental implant spacing on peri‐implant bone using the rabbit (oryctolagus cuniculus) tibia model
Identifieur interne : 004471 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004470; suivant : 004472The effect of dental implant spacing on peri‐implant bone using the rabbit (oryctolagus cuniculus) tibia model
Auteurs : C. Lee Hatley ; Stephen M. Cameron ; Michael F. Cuenin ; M. Harry Parker ; Stevan H. Thompson ; Stephen B. HarveySource :
- Journal of Prosthodontics [ 1059-941X ] ; 2001-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Bone density, Bone density changes, Bone growth, Bone height, Computer image analysis program, Computer statistics program, Dental implant spacing, Dental implants, Digital radiographs, Digital radiography, Eisenhower army, Endosseous implants, Fort gordon, Fracture, Fracture strength, Government work, Guide holes, Histologic, Histologic analysis, Implant, Implant center, Implant failure, Implant fracture, Implant innovations, Implant pair distances, Implant pairs, Implant placement, Implant proximity, Implant sites, Maxillofacial oncology, Measures analysis, Measures anova, Medial aspect, Oryctolagus cuniculus, Osseointegration, Palm beach gardens, Pilot study, Prosthodontic residency program, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic evaluation, Retrospective study, Risk factors, Separation site, Surgical, Tibia, Tibia model, Tibial crest, Trichrome stain, Twist drills, Vertical bone growth, Vertical bone height, Vertical bone height changes.
- Teeft :
- Bone density, Bone density changes, Bone growth, Bone height, Computer image analysis program, Computer statistics program, Dental implant spacing, Dental implants, Digital radiographs, Digital radiography, Eisenhower army, Endosseous implants, Fort gordon, Fracture, Fracture strength, Government work, Guide holes, Histologic, Histologic analysis, Implant, Implant center, Implant failure, Implant fracture, Implant innovations, Implant pair distances, Implant pairs, Implant placement, Implant proximity, Implant sites, Maxillofacial oncology, Measures analysis, Measures anova, Medial aspect, Oryctolagus cuniculus, Osseointegration, Palm beach gardens, Pilot study, Prosthodontic residency program, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic evaluation, Retrospective study, Risk factors, Separation site, Surgical, Tibia, Tibia model, Tibial crest, Trichrome stain, Twist drills, Vertical bone growth, Vertical bone height, Vertical bone height changes.
Abstract
Purpose This study investigated the effects of implant proximity on inter‐implant bone height, density, and osseointegration using digital radiography and histology.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00154.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:8A1EDC2FB1B79D5FC39E93CCA11832342B30817DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The effect of dental implant spacing on peri‐implant bone using the rabbit (oryctolagus cuniculus) tibia model</title><author><name sortKey="Hatley, C Lee" sort="Hatley, C Lee" uniqKey="Hatley C" first="C. Lee" last="Hatley">C. Lee Hatley</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Staff Prosthodontist, U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Stewart, GA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cameron, Stephen M" sort="Cameron, Stephen M" uniqKey="Cameron S" first="Stephen M." last="Cameron">Stephen M. Cameron</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Director, Prosthodontic Residency Program and Chief, Maxillofacial Prosthetics/Dental Oncology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: stephen.cameron@se.amedd.army.mil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cuenin, Michael F" sort="Cuenin, Michael F" uniqKey="Cuenin M" first="Michael F." last="Cuenin">Michael F. Cuenin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Director, Periodontic Residency Program, U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Parker, M Harry" sort="Parker, M Harry" uniqKey="Parker M" first="M. Harry" last="Parker">M. Harry Parker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical College of Georgia School of Dentistry, Augusta, GA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Thompson, Stevan H" sort="Thompson, Stevan H" uniqKey="Thompson S" first="Stevan H." last="Thompson">Stevan H. Thompson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Chief, Oral Pathology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Harvey, Stephen B" sort="Harvey, Stephen B" uniqKey="Harvey S" first="Stephen B." last="Harvey">Stephen B. Harvey</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Chief, Laboratory Animal Support Service, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8A1EDC2FB1B79D5FC39E93CCA11832342B30817D</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00154.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8A1EDC2FB1B79D5FC39E93CCA11832342B30817D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004471</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004471</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The effect of dental implant spacing on peri‐implant bone using the rabbit (<hi rend="italic">oryctolagus cuniculus</hi>) tibia model</title><author><name sortKey="Hatley, C Lee" sort="Hatley, C Lee" uniqKey="Hatley C" first="C. Lee" last="Hatley">C. Lee Hatley</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Staff Prosthodontist, U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Stewart, GA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cameron, Stephen M" sort="Cameron, Stephen M" uniqKey="Cameron S" first="Stephen M." last="Cameron">Stephen M. Cameron</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Director, Prosthodontic Residency Program and Chief, Maxillofacial Prosthetics/Dental Oncology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: stephen.cameron@se.amedd.army.mil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cuenin, Michael F" sort="Cuenin, Michael F" uniqKey="Cuenin M" first="Michael F." last="Cuenin">Michael F. Cuenin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Director, Periodontic Residency Program, U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Parker, M Harry" sort="Parker, M Harry" uniqKey="Parker M" first="M. Harry" last="Parker">M. Harry Parker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical College of Georgia School of Dentistry, Augusta, GA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Thompson, Stevan H" sort="Thompson, Stevan H" uniqKey="Thompson S" first="Stevan H." last="Thompson">Stevan H. Thompson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Chief, Oral Pathology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Harvey, Stephen B" sort="Harvey, Stephen B" uniqKey="Harvey S" first="Stephen B." last="Harvey">Stephen B. Harvey</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Chief, Laboratory Animal Support Service, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="154">154</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="159">159</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-09">2001-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone density changes</term><term>Bone growth</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Computer image analysis program</term><term>Computer statistics program</term><term>Dental implant spacing</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Digital radiographs</term><term>Digital radiography</term><term>Eisenhower army</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Fort gordon</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Fracture strength</term><term>Government work</term><term>Guide holes</term><term>Histologic</term><term>Histologic analysis</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant center</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant fracture</term><term>Implant innovations</term><term>Implant pair distances</term><term>Implant pairs</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant proximity</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Maxillofacial oncology</term><term>Measures analysis</term><term>Measures anova</term><term>Medial aspect</term><term>Oryctolagus cuniculus</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Palm beach gardens</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Prosthodontic residency program</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic evaluation</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Risk factors</term><term>Separation site</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Tibia</term><term>Tibia model</term><term>Tibial crest</term><term>Trichrome stain</term><term>Twist drills</term><term>Vertical bone growth</term><term>Vertical bone height</term><term>Vertical bone height changes</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone density changes</term><term>Bone growth</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Computer image analysis program</term><term>Computer statistics program</term><term>Dental implant spacing</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Digital radiographs</term><term>Digital radiography</term><term>Eisenhower army</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Fort gordon</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Fracture strength</term><term>Government work</term><term>Guide holes</term><term>Histologic</term><term>Histologic analysis</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant center</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant fracture</term><term>Implant innovations</term><term>Implant pair distances</term><term>Implant pairs</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant proximity</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Maxillofacial oncology</term><term>Measures analysis</term><term>Measures anova</term><term>Medial aspect</term><term>Oryctolagus cuniculus</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Palm beach gardens</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Prosthodontic residency program</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic evaluation</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Risk factors</term><term>Separation site</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Tibia</term><term>Tibia model</term><term>Tibial crest</term><term>Trichrome stain</term><term>Twist drills</term><term>Vertical bone growth</term><term>Vertical bone height</term><term>Vertical bone height changes</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Purpose This study investigated the effects of implant proximity on inter‐implant bone height, density, and osseointegration using digital radiography and histology.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>tibia</json:string><json:string>bone density</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>bone height</json:string><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>vertical bone growth</json:string><json:string>histologic</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>bone growth</json:string><json:string>implant pairs</json:string><json:string>fort gordon</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>implant proximity</json:string><json:string>digital radiographs</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>eisenhower army</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>pilot study</json:string><json:string>implant sites</json:string><json:string>oryctolagus cuniculus</json:string><json:string>vertical bone height</json:string><json:string>measures analysis</json:string><json:string>government work</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic residency program</json:string><json:string>dental implant spacing</json:string><json:string>digital radiography</json:string><json:string>vertical bone height changes</json:string><json:string>implant innovations</json:string><json:string>palm beach gardens</json:string><json:string>endosseous implants</json:string><json:string>implant center</json:string><json:string>tibia model</json:string><json:string>bone density changes</json:string><json:string>computer image analysis program</json:string><json:string>computer statistics program</json:string><json:string>medial aspect</json:string><json:string>implant pair distances</json:string><json:string>fracture strength</json:string><json:string>histologic analysis</json:string><json:string>trichrome stain</json:string><json:string>tibial crest</json:string><json:string>guide holes</json:string><json:string>twist drills</json:string><json:string>separation site</json:string><json:string>radiographic evaluation</json:string><json:string>measures anova</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>implant fracture</json:string><json:string>risk factors</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial oncology</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>C. Lee Hatley DMD</name><affiliations><json:string>Staff Prosthodontist, U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Stewart, GA.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Stephen M. Cameron DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Director, Prosthodontic Residency Program and Chief, Maxillofacial Prosthetics/Dental Oncology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</json:string><json:string>E-mail: stephen.cameron@se.amedd.army.mil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Michael F. Cuenin DMD</name><affiliations><json:string>Director, Periodontic Residency Program, U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. Harry Parker DDS, MS</name><affiliations><json:string>Associate Professor, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical College of Georgia School of Dentistry, Augusta, GA.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Stevan H. Thompson DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Chief, Oral Pathology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Stephen B. Harvey DVM, MS</name><affiliations><json:string>Chief, Laboratory Animal Support Service, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone histology</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>digital radiography</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>digital radiodensitometry</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant spacing</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOPR154</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-D5RKVC4H-F</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Purpose This study investigated the effects of implant proximity on inter‐implant bone height, density, and osseointegration using digital radiography and histology.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.236</score><pdfWordCount>2984</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>18449</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>594 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>21</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>165</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The effect of dental implant spacing on peri‐implant bone using the rabbit (oryctolagus cuniculus) tibia model</title><pmid><json:string>11641843</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Prosthodontics</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1059-941X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1532-849X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOPR</json:string></publisherId><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>154</first><last>159</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2001</json:string><json:string>1999</json:string></date><geogName><json:string>Beach Gardens</json:string></geogName><orgName><json:string>Delmarva Laboratories, Inc</json:string><json:string>Cooperative Research and Development Agreement</json:string><json:string>Army Dental Activity, Fort Stewart, GA</json:string><json:string>Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use</json:string><json:string>Instron Corp, Canton</json:string><json:string>Sharry Research Competition</json:string><json:string>Laboratory Animal Support Service, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA</json:string><json:string>Rinn Corp</json:string><json:string>American College of Prosthodontists</json:string><json:string>Department of Defense</json:string><json:string>Implant Innovations, Inc</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical College of Georgia School of Dentistry, Augusta, GA</json:string><json:string>SPSS Inc, Chicago</json:string><json:string>Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Stevan H. Thompson</json:string><json:string>Branemark</json:string><json:string>Michael F. Cuenin</json:string><json:string>Harry Parker</json:string><json:string>Session</json:string><json:string>Silver Spring</json:string><json:string>Stephen B. Harvey</json:string><json:string>Stephen M. Cameron</json:string><json:string>Postsurgical</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Vincennes</json:string><json:string>GA</json:string><json:string>Elgin</json:string><json:string>Midlothian</json:string><json:string>VA</json:string><json:string>Augusta</json:string><json:string>France</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Basquill et al.</json:string><json:string>Hatley et al</json:string><json:string>Ohrnell et al</json:string><json:string>Eckert et al</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-D5RKVC4H-F</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2001</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2001</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00154.x</json:string></doi><id>8A1EDC2FB1B79D5FC39E93CCA11832342B30817D</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8A1EDC2FB1B79D5FC39E93CCA11832342B30817D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8A1EDC2FB1B79D5FC39E93CCA11832342B30817D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8A1EDC2FB1B79D5FC39E93CCA11832342B30817D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The effect of dental implant spacing on peri‐implant bone using the rabbit (<hi rend="italic">oryctolagus cuniculus</hi>) tibia model</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-09"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The effect of dental implant spacing on peri‐implant bone using the rabbit (<hi rend="italic">oryctolagus cuniculus</hi>) tibia model</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">C. Lee</forename><surname>Hatley</surname><roleName type="degree">DMD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Staff Prosthodontist, U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Stewart, GA.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Stephen M.</forename><surname>Cameron</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Director, Prosthodontic Residency Program and Chief, Maxillofacial Prosthetics/Dental Oncology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</affiliation><affiliation>Stephen M. Cameron, DDS, Director, Prosthodontic Residency Program and Chief, Maxillofacial Prosthetics/Dental Oncology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA 30905–6500. E‐mail: stephen.cameron@se.amedd.army.mil</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Michael F.</forename><surname>Cuenin</surname><roleName type="degree">DMD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Director, Periodontic Residency Program, U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">M. Harry</forename><surname>Parker</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical College of Georgia School of Dentistry, Augusta, GA.<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Stevan H.</forename><surname>Thompson</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Chief, Oral Pathology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Stephen B.</forename><surname>Harvey</surname><roleName type="degree">DVM, MS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Chief, Laboratory Animal Support Service, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA.</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">8A1EDC2FB1B79D5FC39E93CCA11832342B30817D</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-D5RKVC4H-F</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00154.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOPR154</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOPR.JOPR154.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title><idno type="pISSN">1059-941X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jopr.2001.10.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">JOPR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="154">154</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="159">159</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-09"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold"><emph><span>Purpose</span></emph></hi> This study investigated the effects of implant proximity on inter‐implant bone height, density, and osseointegration using digital radiography and histology.</p><p><hi rend="bold"><emph><span>Materials and Methods</span></emph></hi> After a feasibility study, a total of 80 endosteal implants were placed in 20 New Zealand White Rabbit tibias. With the aid of a surgical jig, four 8.5‐mm implants were placed in the medial aspect of the tibial crest at inter‐implant distances of approximately 1, 1.5, and 3 mm. Standardized digital radiographs using a paralleling device were made immediately after placement of implants. Implants were allowed to osseointegrate for 90 days. After this healing period, the animals were sacrificed, and the standardized radiographs were repeated. The tibias were harvested, processed, and invested in epoxy. Sagittal sections were made from each specimen for histologic evaluation. The initial and postmortem digital radiographs were evaluated for inter‐implant distances, vertical bone height changes over time and between implant pairs, and bone density changes over time and between implant pairs using a computer image analysis program and computer statistics program.</p><p><hi rend="bold"><emph><span>Results</span></emph></hi> The actual inter‐implant distances were consistent in a range of 0.2 mm. Bone height increased significantly from presurgical levels at all 3 locations (<emph><span><hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .0005</span></emph>). Repeated measures analysis of variance comparing change in bone height at the 3 implant pair distances showed significant differences among the 3 (<emph><span><hi rend="italic">p</hi>= .002</span></emph>). Paired <hi rend="italic">t</hi> tests showed that the amount of bone growth at the 1‐mm separation site was significantly greater than the 1.5‐mm site (<emph><span><hi rend="italic">p</hi>= .026</span></emph>) and the 3‐mm site (<emph><span><hi rend="italic">p</hi>= .001</span></emph>), whereas bone growth at the 1.5‐ and 3‐mm sites did not show significant differences (<emph><span><hi rend="italic">p</hi>= .162</span></emph>). A repeated measures analysis of variance comparing change in bone density showed no significant differences (<emph><span><hi rend="italic">p</hi> > .05</span></emph>) among the 3 inter‐implant distances for either the 8‐mm position (approximately crestal bone height) or the 6‐mm position (approximately 2 mm subcrestal).</p><p><hi rend="bold"><emph><span>Conclusions</span></emph></hi> Within the limits of this study, it seems placing implants closely together does not adversely affect bone height or density. Conversely, it seems that placing implants closer together may increase bone growth.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bone histology</term><term xml:id="k2">digital radiography</term><term xml:id="k3">digital radiodensitometry</term><term xml:id="k4">implants</term><term xml:id="k5">implant spacing</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Basic Science Research</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8A1EDC2FB1B79D5FC39E93CCA11832342B30817D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</doi><issn type="print">1059-941X</issn><issn type="electronic">1532-849X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOPR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS">Journal of Prosthodontics</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jopr.2001.10.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="10">10</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2001-09">September 2001</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0015400" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00154.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOPR154"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Basic Science Research</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2004-08-06"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2004-08-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-31"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="154">154</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="159">159</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo> Stephen M. Cameron, DDS, Director, Prosthodontic Residency Program and Chief, Maxillofacial Prosthetics/Dental Oncology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA 30905–6500. E‐mail: <email>stephen.cameron@se.amedd.army.mil</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOPR.JOPR154.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted June 25, 2001.</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="13"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="28"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="figureTotal" number="8"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The effect of dental implant spacing on peri‐implant bone using the rabbit (<i>oryctolagus cuniculus</i>) tibia model</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>C. Lee</givenNames><familyName>Hatley</familyName><degrees>DMD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Stephen M.</givenNames><familyName>Cameron</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Michael F.</givenNames><familyName>Cuenin</familyName><degrees>DMD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>M. Harry</givenNames><familyName>Parker</familyName><degrees>DDS, MS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a5"><personName><givenNames>Stevan H.</givenNames><familyName>Thompson</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a6"><personName><givenNames>Stephen B.</givenNames><familyName>Harvey</familyName><degrees>DVM, MS</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Staff Prosthodontist, U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Stewart, GA.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Director, Prosthodontic Residency Program and Chief, Maxillofacial Prosthetics/Dental Oncology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3"><unparsedAffiliation>Director, Periodontic Residency Program, U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical College of Georgia School of Dentistry, Augusta, GA.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5"><unparsedAffiliation>Chief, Oral Pathology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a6"><unparsedAffiliation>Chief, Laboratory Animal Support Service, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bone histology</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">digital radiography</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">digital radiodensitometry</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">implant spacing</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b><span cssStyle="text-decoration:underline">Purpose</span></b> This study investigated the effects of implant proximity on inter‐implant bone height, density, and osseointegration using digital radiography and histology.</p><p><b><span cssStyle="text-decoration:underline">Materials and Methods</span></b> After a feasibility study, a total of 80 endosteal implants were placed in 20 New Zealand White Rabbit tibias. With the aid of a surgical jig, four 8.5‐mm implants were placed in the medial aspect of the tibial crest at inter‐implant distances of approximately 1, 1.5, and 3 mm. Standardized digital radiographs using a paralleling device were made immediately after placement of implants. Implants were allowed to osseointegrate for 90 days. After this healing period, the animals were sacrificed, and the standardized radiographs were repeated. The tibias were harvested, processed, and invested in epoxy. Sagittal sections were made from each specimen for histologic evaluation. The initial and postmortem digital radiographs were evaluated for inter‐implant distances, vertical bone height changes over time and between implant pairs, and bone density changes over time and between implant pairs using a computer image analysis program and computer statistics program.</p><p><b><span cssStyle="text-decoration:underline">Results</span></b> The actual inter‐implant distances were consistent in a range of 0.2 mm. Bone height increased significantly from presurgical levels at all 3 locations (<span type="mathematics"><i>p</i> < .0005</span>). Repeated measures analysis of variance comparing change in bone height at the 3 implant pair distances showed significant differences among the 3 (<span type="mathematics"><i>p</i>= .002</span>). Paired <i>t</i> tests showed that the amount of bone growth at the 1‐mm separation site was significantly greater than the 1.5‐mm site (<span type="mathematics"><i>p</i>= .026</span>) and the 3‐mm site (<span type="mathematics"><i>p</i>= .001</span>), whereas bone growth at the 1.5‐ and 3‐mm sites did not show significant differences (<span type="mathematics"><i>p</i>= .162</span>). A repeated measures analysis of variance comparing change in bone density showed no significant differences (<span type="mathematics"><i>p</i> > .05</span>) among the 3 inter‐implant distances for either the 8‐mm position (approximately crestal bone height) or the 6‐mm position (approximately 2 mm subcrestal).</p><p><b><span cssStyle="text-decoration:underline">Conclusions</span></b> Within the limits of this study, it seems placing implants closely together does not adversely affect bone height or density. Conversely, it seems that placing implants closer together may increase bone growth.</p><!--
J Prosthodont 2001;10:154–159. This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.
--></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="n-fnt-1" numbered="no"><p>This research was funded in part through a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with Implant Innovations, Inc, Palm Beach Gardens, FL.</p></note><note xml:id="n-fnt-2" numbered="no"><p>This article was a finalist for the John J. Sharry Research Competition and was presented at the 1999 Annual Session of the American College of Prosthodontists in New York City.</p></note><note xml:id="n-fnt-3" numbered="no"><p>The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect those of the Department of Defense.</p></note><note xml:id="n-fnt-4" numbered="no"><p>This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The effect of dental implant spacing on peri‐implant bone using the rabbit (oryctolagus cuniculus) tibia model</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The effect of dental implant spacing on peri‐implant bone using the rabbit (oryctolagus cuniculus) tibia model</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C. Lee</namePart><namePart type="family">Hatley</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DMD</namePart><affiliation>Staff Prosthodontist, U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Stewart, GA.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stephen M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Cameron</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Director, Prosthodontic Residency Program and Chief, Maxillofacial Prosthetics/Dental Oncology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: stephen.cameron@se.amedd.army.mil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michael F.</namePart><namePart type="family">Cuenin</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DMD</namePart><affiliation>Director, Periodontic Residency Program, U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M. Harry</namePart><namePart type="family">Parker</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MS</namePart><affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical College of Georgia School of Dentistry, Augusta, GA.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stevan H.</namePart><namePart type="family">Thompson</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Chief, Oral Pathology, Eisenhower Army Medical Center and U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Gordon, GA.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stephen B.</namePart><namePart type="family">Harvey</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DVM, MS</namePart><affiliation>Chief, Laboratory Animal Support Service, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-09</dateIssued><edition>Accepted June 25, 2001.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">8</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">13</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">28</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Purpose This study investigated the effects of implant proximity on inter‐implant bone height, density, and osseointegration using digital radiography and histology.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods After a feasibility study, a total of 80 endosteal implants were placed in 20 New Zealand White Rabbit tibias. With the aid of a surgical jig, four 8.5‐mm implants were placed in the medial aspect of the tibial crest at inter‐implant distances of approximately 1, 1.5, and 3 mm. Standardized digital radiographs using a paralleling device were made immediately after placement of implants. Implants were allowed to osseointegrate for 90 days. After this healing period, the animals were sacrificed, and the standardized radiographs were repeated. The tibias were harvested, processed, and invested in epoxy. Sagittal sections were made from each specimen for histologic evaluation. The initial and postmortem digital radiographs were evaluated for inter‐implant distances, vertical bone height changes over time and between implant pairs, and bone density changes over time and between implant pairs using a computer image analysis program and computer statistics program.</abstract><abstract>Results The actual inter‐implant distances were consistent in a range of 0.2 mm. Bone height increased significantly from presurgical levels at all 3 locations (p < .0005). Repeated measures analysis of variance comparing change in bone height at the 3 implant pair distances showed significant differences among the 3 (p= .002). Paired t tests showed that the amount of bone growth at the 1‐mm separation site was significantly greater than the 1.5‐mm site (p= .026) and the 3‐mm site (p= .001), whereas bone growth at the 1.5‐ and 3‐mm sites did not show significant differences (p= .162). A repeated measures analysis of variance comparing change in bone density showed no significant differences (p > .05) among the 3 inter‐implant distances for either the 8‐mm position (approximately crestal bone height) or the 6‐mm position (approximately 2 mm subcrestal).</abstract><abstract>Conclusions Within the limits of this study, it seems placing implants closely together does not adversely affect bone height or density. Conversely, it seems that placing implants closer together may increase bone growth.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone histology</topic><topic>digital radiography</topic><topic>digital radiodensitometry</topic><topic>implants</topic><topic>implant spacing</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Prosthodontics</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1059-941X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1532-849X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOPR</identifier><part><date>2001</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>10</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>154</start><end>159</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">8A1EDC2FB1B79D5FC39E93CCA11832342B30817D</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-D5RKVC4H-F</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00154.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOPR154</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8A1EDC2FB1B79D5FC39E93CCA11832342B30817D/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004471 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004471 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8A1EDC2FB1B79D5FC39E93CCA11832342B30817D
|texte= The effect of dental implant spacing on peri‐implant bone using the rabbit (oryctolagus cuniculus) tibia model
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |