Short Implants in the Severely Resorbed Maxilla: A 2‐Year Retrospective Clinical Study
Identifieur interne : 004440 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004439; suivant : 004441Short Implants in the Severely Resorbed Maxilla: A 2‐Year Retrospective Clinical Study
Auteurs : Franck Renouard ; David NisandSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2005-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Biocare, Biomechanical prognosis, Bone loss, Bone resorption, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical study, Cumulative survival rate, Dense bone structures, Dent, Failure analysis, Immediate occlusal loading, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant length, Implant placement, Implants system, Long implants, Machined, Machined implant, Machined implants, Machined surface, Marginal bone loss, Marginal bone resorption, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillofac, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Oxidized, Oxidized implants, Oxidized surface, Partial prostheses, Periapical radiographs, Posterior maxilla, Present study, Prospective multicenter study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic rehabilitation, Quintessence publishing, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic readings, Resorbed, Resorbed maxilla, Resorption, Retrospective, Retrospective study, Same patient, Short implants, Sinus, Sinus elevation, Soft bone, Success rate, Surgical, Surgical protocol, Surgical techniques, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review.
- Teeft :
- Biocare, Biomechanical prognosis, Bone loss, Bone resorption, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical study, Cumulative survival rate, Dense bone structures, Dent, Failure analysis, Immediate occlusal loading, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant length, Implant placement, Implants system, Long implants, Machined, Machined implant, Machined implants, Machined surface, Marginal bone loss, Marginal bone resorption, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillofac, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Oxidized, Oxidized implants, Oxidized surface, Partial prostheses, Periapical radiographs, Posterior maxilla, Present study, Prospective multicenter study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic rehabilitation, Quintessence publishing, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic readings, Resorbed, Resorbed maxilla, Resorption, Retrospective, Retrospective study, Same patient, Short implants, Sinus, Sinus elevation, Soft bone, Success rate, Surgical, Surgical protocol, Surgical techniques, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00082.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:8990B939B6377980A5E65E165F9A6FA2B7D25BA5Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Short Implants in the Severely Resorbed Maxilla: A 2‐Year Retrospective Clinical Study</title><author><name sortKey="Renouard, Franck" sort="Renouard, Franck" uniqKey="Renouard F" first="Franck" last="Renouard">Franck Renouard</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: frenouard@aol.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nisand, David" sort="Nisand, David" uniqKey="Nisand D" first="David" last="Nisand">David Nisand</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Resident, Department of Periodontology, Paris VII University, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8990B939B6377980A5E65E165F9A6FA2B7D25BA5</idno><date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00082.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8990B939B6377980A5E65E165F9A6FA2B7D25BA5/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004440</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004440</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Short Implants in the Severely Resorbed Maxilla: A 2‐Year Retrospective Clinical Study</title><author><name sortKey="Renouard, Franck" sort="Renouard, Franck" uniqKey="Renouard F" first="Franck" last="Renouard">Franck Renouard</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: frenouard@aol.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nisand, David" sort="Nisand, David" uniqKey="Nisand D" first="David" last="Nisand">David Nisand</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Resident, Department of Periodontology, Paris VII University, Paris, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="s104">s104</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="s110">s110</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-06">2005-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biocare</term><term>Biomechanical prognosis</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dense bone structures</term><term>Dent</term><term>Failure analysis</term><term>Immediate occlusal loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implants system</term><term>Long implants</term><term>Machined</term><term>Machined implant</term><term>Machined implants</term><term>Machined surface</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Marginal bone resorption</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oxidized</term><term>Oxidized implants</term><term>Oxidized surface</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Periapical radiographs</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic rehabilitation</term><term>Quintessence publishing</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic readings</term><term>Resorbed</term><term>Resorbed maxilla</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Same patient</term><term>Short implants</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Sinus elevation</term><term>Soft bone</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical protocol</term><term>Surgical techniques</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Systematic review</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Biocare</term><term>Biomechanical prognosis</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dense bone structures</term><term>Dent</term><term>Failure analysis</term><term>Immediate occlusal loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implants system</term><term>Long implants</term><term>Machined</term><term>Machined implant</term><term>Machined implants</term><term>Machined surface</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Marginal bone resorption</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oxidized</term><term>Oxidized implants</term><term>Oxidized surface</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Periapical radiographs</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic rehabilitation</term><term>Quintessence publishing</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic readings</term><term>Resorbed</term><term>Resorbed maxilla</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Same patient</term><term>Short implants</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Sinus elevation</term><term>Soft bone</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical protocol</term><term>Surgical techniques</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Systematic review</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">ABSTRACT</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>short implants</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>machined</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>resorbed</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>oxidized</json:string><json:string>resorbed maxilla</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>resorption</json:string><json:string>biocare</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>sinus</json:string><json:string>surgical protocol</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>survival rates</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>posterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>retrospective</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>machined surface</json:string><json:string>cumulative survival rate</json:string><json:string>machined implants</json:string><json:string>oxidized surface</json:string><json:string>failure analysis</json:string><json:string>implant length</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>marginal bone resorption</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>success rate</json:string><json:string>machined implant</json:string><json:string>same patient</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>soft bone</json:string><json:string>dense bone structures</json:string><json:string>prosthetic rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>sinus elevation</json:string><json:string>oxidized implants</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>periapical radiographs</json:string><json:string>biomechanical prognosis</json:string><json:string>radiographic readings</json:string><json:string>prospective multicenter study</json:string><json:string>long implants</json:string><json:string>implants system</json:string><json:string>partial prostheses</json:string><json:string>implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>surgical techniques</json:string><json:string>bone resorption</json:string><json:string>quintessence publishing</json:string><json:string>immediate occlusal loading</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Franck Renouard DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Private practice, Paris, France</json:string><json:string>E-mail: frenouard@aol.com</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>David Nisand DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Resident, Department of Periodontology, Paris VII University, Paris, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>atrophic</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>initial stability</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>maxilla</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>resorption</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>short implants</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CIDS104</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-5KF8PK6T-1</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>ABSTRACT</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>4.927</score><pdfWordCount>2915</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>18765</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>1</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>8</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Short Implants in the Severely Resorbed Maxilla: A 2‐Year Retrospective Clinical Study</title><pmid><json:string>16137095</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>7</volume><pages><first>s104</first><last>s110</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2005</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>France Reprint</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Fugazzotto</json:string><json:string>Pierrisnard</json:string><json:string>David Nisand</json:string><json:string>Franck Renouard</json:string><json:string>Deporter</json:string><json:string>Raghoebar</json:string><json:string>Drawing</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Paris</json:string><json:string>France</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-5KF8PK6T-1</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2005</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2005</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00082.x</json:string></doi><id>8990B939B6377980A5E65E165F9A6FA2B7D25BA5</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8990B939B6377980A5E65E165F9A6FA2B7D25BA5/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8990B939B6377980A5E65E165F9A6FA2B7D25BA5/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8990B939B6377980A5E65E165F9A6FA2B7D25BA5/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Short Implants in the Severely Resorbed Maxilla: A 2‐Year Retrospective Clinical Study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Short Implants in the Severely Resorbed Maxilla: A 2‐Year Retrospective Clinical Study</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Franck</forename><surname>Renouard</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Private practice, Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests: Franck Renouard, DDS, 26 Avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France; e‐mail: frenouard@aol.com</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">David</forename><surname>Nisand</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Resident, Department of Periodontology, Paris VII University, Paris, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">8990B939B6377980A5E65E165F9A6FA2B7D25BA5</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-5KF8PK6T-1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00082.x</idno><idno type="unit">CIDS104</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CIDs104.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2005.7.issue-s1</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="s104">s104</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="s110">s110</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main">
ABSTRACT
Background:
<p>Although the predictability of endosseous dental implants is well documented, the restoration of the posterior region of the maxilla remains a challenge. The placement of short implants is one therapeutic option that reduces the need for augmentation therapy.</p>
Purpose:
<p>The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the survival rates of 6 to 8.5 mm‐long implants in the severely resorbed maxilla following a surgical protocol for optimized initial implant stability.</p>
Materials and Methods:
<p>The study included 85 patients with 96 short (6–8.5 mm) implants (Brånemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) supporting single‐tooth and partial reconstructions. The implants had a machined (54) or an oxidized (TiUnite™, Nobel Biocare AB) (42) surface. A one‐stage surgical protocol with delayed loading was used. The patients were followed for at least 2 years after loading (average follow‐up period 37.6 months). The marginal bone resorption was assessed by radiographic readings.</p>
Results:
<p>Five implants were lost during the first 9 months, and four implants were lost to follow‐up. The cumulative survival rate was 94.6%. Four of the failed implants had a machined surface, and one had an oxidized surface. The mean marginal bone resorption after 2 years in function was 0.44 ± 0.52 mm.</p>
Conclusion:
<p>This study demonstrates that the use of short implants maybe considered for prosthetic rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla as an alternative to more complicated surgical techniques.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">atrophic</term><term xml:id="k2">initial stability</term><term xml:id="k3">maxilla</term><term xml:id="k4">resorption</term><term xml:id="k5">short implants</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8990B939B6377980A5E65E165F9A6FA2B7D25BA5/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06000"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2005.7.issue-s1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="7">7</numbering><numbering type="supplement">s1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2005-06">June 2005</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0010400" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00082.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CIDS104"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2006-08-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2006-08-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">s104</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">s110</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Reprint requests: Franck Renouard, DDS, 26 Avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France; e‐mail: <email>frenouard@aol.com</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CIDs104.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="27"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="3"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Short Implants in the Severely Resorbed Maxilla: A 2‐Year Retrospective Clinical Study</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Franck</givenNames><familyName>Renouard</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>David</givenNames><familyName>Nisand</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Private practice, Paris, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Resident, Department of Periodontology, Paris VII University, Paris, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">atrophic</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">initial stability</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">maxilla</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">resorption</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">short implants</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><section xml:id="abs1-1"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title></section><section xml:id="abs1-2"><title type="main">Background:</title><p>Although the predictability of endosseous dental implants is well documented, the restoration of the posterior region of the maxilla remains a challenge. The placement of short implants is one therapeutic option that reduces the need for augmentation therapy.</p></section><section xml:id="abs1-3"><title type="main">Purpose:</title><p>The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the survival rates of 6 to 8.5 mm‐long implants in the severely resorbed maxilla following a surgical protocol for optimized initial implant stability.</p></section><section xml:id="abs1-4"><title type="main">Materials and Methods:</title><p>The study included 85 patients with 96 short (6–8.5 mm) implants (Brånemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) supporting single‐tooth and partial reconstructions. The implants had a machined (54) or an oxidized (TiUnite™, Nobel Biocare AB) (42) surface. A one‐stage surgical protocol with delayed loading was used. The patients were followed for at least 2 years after loading (average follow‐up period 37.6 months). The marginal bone resorption was assessed by radiographic readings.</p></section><section xml:id="abs1-5"><title type="main">Results:</title><p>Five implants were lost during the first 9 months, and four implants were lost to follow‐up. The cumulative survival rate was 94.6%. Four of the failed implants had a machined surface, and one had an oxidized surface. The mean marginal bone resorption after 2 years in function was 0.44 ± 0.52 mm.</p></section><section xml:id="abs1-6"><title type="main">Conclusion:</title><p>This study demonstrates that the use of short implants maybe considered for prosthetic rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla as an alternative to more complicated surgical techniques.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Short Implants in the Severely Resorbed Maxilla: A 2‐Year Retrospective Clinical Study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Short Implants in the Severely Resorbed Maxilla: A 2‐Year Retrospective Clinical Study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Franck</namePart><namePart type="family">Renouard</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Private practice, Paris, France</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: frenouard@aol.com</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">David</namePart><namePart type="family">Nisand</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Resident, Department of Periodontology, Paris VII University, Paris, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2005-06</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2005</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">27</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">3</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>ABSTRACT</abstract><abstract>Although the predictability of endosseous dental implants is well documented, the restoration of the posterior region of the maxilla remains a challenge. The placement of short implants is one therapeutic option that reduces the need for augmentation therapy.</abstract><abstract>The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the survival rates of 6 to 8.5 mm‐long implants in the severely resorbed maxilla following a surgical protocol for optimized initial implant stability.</abstract><abstract>The study included 85 patients with 96 short (6–8.5 mm) implants (Brånemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) supporting single‐tooth and partial reconstructions. The implants had a machined (54) or an oxidized (TiUnite™, Nobel Biocare AB) (42) surface. A one‐stage surgical protocol with delayed loading was used. The patients were followed for at least 2 years after loading (average follow‐up period 37.6 months). The marginal bone resorption was assessed by radiographic readings.</abstract><abstract>Five implants were lost during the first 9 months, and four implants were lost to follow‐up. The cumulative survival rate was 94.6%. Four of the failed implants had a machined surface, and one had an oxidized surface. The mean marginal bone resorption after 2 years in function was 0.44 ± 0.52 mm.</abstract><abstract>This study demonstrates that the use of short implants maybe considered for prosthetic rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla as an alternative to more complicated surgical techniques.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>atrophic</topic><topic>initial stability</topic><topic>maxilla</topic><topic>resorption</topic><topic>short implants</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2005</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>7</number></detail><detail type="supplement"><caption>Suppl. no.</caption><number>s1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>s104</start><end>s110</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">8990B939B6377980A5E65E165F9A6FA2B7D25BA5</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-5KF8PK6T-1</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00082.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CIDS104</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8990B939B6377980A5E65E165F9A6FA2B7D25BA5/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004440 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004440 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8990B939B6377980A5E65E165F9A6FA2B7D25BA5
|texte= Short Implants in the Severely Resorbed Maxilla: A 2‐Year Retrospective Clinical Study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |