A 10‐year follow‐up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges
Identifieur interne : 004437 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004436; suivant : 004438A 10‐year follow‐up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges
Auteurs : Torgny Haraldson ; George ZarbSource :
- European Journal of Oral Sciences [ 0909-8836 ] ; 1988-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acrylic resin, Aeta odontol scand, Anamnestic, Anamnestic dysfunction index, Biteforce levels, Carlsson, Clinical dentistry, Clinical dysfunction index, Clinical examination, Clinical symptoms, Common number, Common type, Complete denture wearers, Complete dentures, Continuous bridge function, Dent, Denture, Denture wearers, Dysfunction, Fixture, Force levels, Front teeth, Functional occlusion, Functional rehabilitation, Gold bridge, Haraldson, Hard foods, Implant, Implant bridges, Mandible, Mandibular dysfunction, Masticatory, Masticatory function, Masticatory system, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary denture, Maximal, Mild dysfunction, Natural teeth, Observation period, Occlusal state, Oibs, Older design, Oral function, Oral hygiene, Oral implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implant bridges, Osseointegrated implants, Other centers, Overall judgment, Past history, Patients index value, Plast reeonstr surg, Positive correlation, Premolar region, Present study, Previous examination, Prosthesis, Scand, Severe symptoms, Social life, Stomatognathic physiology, Stomatognathic system, Swed dent, Test level, Wearer, Zarb.
- Teeft :
- Acrylic resin, Aeta odontol scand, Anamnestic, Anamnestic dysfunction index, Biteforce levels, Carlsson, Clinical dentistry, Clinical dysfunction index, Clinical examination, Clinical symptoms, Common number, Common type, Complete denture wearers, Complete dentures, Continuous bridge function, Dent, Denture, Denture wearers, Dysfunction, Fixture, Force levels, Front teeth, Functional occlusion, Functional rehabilitation, Gold bridge, Haraldson, Hard foods, Implant, Implant bridges, Mandible, Mandibular dysfunction, Masticatory, Masticatory function, Masticatory system, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary denture, Maximal, Mild dysfunction, Natural teeth, Observation period, Occlusal state, Oibs, Older design, Oral function, Oral hygiene, Oral implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implant bridges, Osseointegrated implants, Other centers, Overall judgment, Past history, Patients index value, Plast reeonstr surg, Positive correlation, Premolar region, Present study, Previous examination, Prosthesis, Scand, Severe symptoms, Social life, Stomatognathic physiology, Stomatognathic system, Swed dent, Test level, Wearer, Zarb.
Abstract
Abstract – Twenty‐one patients with osseointegrated implant bridges (OIB), with an average age of 65 yr, were functionally examined at a 10‐yr follow‐up. Altogether 27 OIBs, supported by 138 fixtures, were examined. The examination comprised an anamnestic and clinical examination and registration of bite force. 90% of the patients were very satisfied with the outcome of the treatment. According to the anamnestic dysfunction index (Ai), 80% of the patients were symptom free in their masticatory system. The occlusal state was found to be good. Seventy‐five percent of the patients were found to have only mild dysfunction of their masticatory system or to be symptomless according to the clinical dysfunction index (Di). The bite force ranged from 3 to 118 N at gentle biting, from 25 to 250 N at “biting as when chewing” and from 77.5 to 495.5 N at maximal bite force. On average the bite force had improved significantly at all biteforce levels tested compared to an examination 10 yr earlier. It is concluded that oral function in patients with OIBs is very favorable.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01551.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:898AA1F1E0EF35BAA39BD80F8F6F7E1248B6B8F8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A 10‐year follow‐up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges</title><author><name sortKey="Haraldson, Torgny" sort="Haraldson, Torgny" uniqKey="Haraldson T" first="Torgny" last="Haraldson">Torgny Haraldson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Torgny Haraldson, Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, Box 33070, S‐400 33 Göteborg, Sweden.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zarb, George" sort="Zarb, George" uniqKey="Zarb G" first="George" last="Zarb">George Zarb</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:898AA1F1E0EF35BAA39BD80F8F6F7E1248B6B8F8</idno><date when="1988" year="1988">1988</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01551.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/898AA1F1E0EF35BAA39BD80F8F6F7E1248B6B8F8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004437</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004437</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A 10‐year follow‐up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges</title><author><name sortKey="Haraldson, Torgny" sort="Haraldson, Torgny" uniqKey="Haraldson T" first="Torgny" last="Haraldson">Torgny Haraldson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Torgny Haraldson, Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, Box 33070, S‐400 33 Göteborg, Sweden.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zarb, George" sort="Zarb, George" uniqKey="Zarb G" first="George" last="Zarb">George Zarb</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">European Journal of Oral Sciences</title><title level="j" type="alt">EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES</title><idno type="ISSN">0909-8836</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0722</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">96</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="243">243</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="252">252</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1988-06">1988-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0909-8836</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0909-8836</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Aeta odontol scand</term><term>Anamnestic</term><term>Anamnestic dysfunction index</term><term>Biteforce levels</term><term>Carlsson</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical dysfunction index</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Clinical symptoms</term><term>Common number</term><term>Common type</term><term>Complete denture wearers</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Continuous bridge function</term><term>Dent</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture wearers</term><term>Dysfunction</term><term>Fixture</term><term>Force levels</term><term>Front teeth</term><term>Functional occlusion</term><term>Functional rehabilitation</term><term>Gold bridge</term><term>Haraldson</term><term>Hard foods</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant bridges</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular dysfunction</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Masticatory system</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary denture</term><term>Maximal</term><term>Mild dysfunction</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Occlusal state</term><term>Oibs</term><term>Older design</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implant bridges</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other centers</term><term>Overall judgment</term><term>Past history</term><term>Patients index value</term><term>Plast reeonstr surg</term><term>Positive correlation</term><term>Premolar region</term><term>Present study</term><term>Previous examination</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Scand</term><term>Severe symptoms</term><term>Social life</term><term>Stomatognathic physiology</term><term>Stomatognathic system</term><term>Swed dent</term><term>Test level</term><term>Wearer</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Aeta odontol scand</term><term>Anamnestic</term><term>Anamnestic dysfunction index</term><term>Biteforce levels</term><term>Carlsson</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical dysfunction index</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Clinical symptoms</term><term>Common number</term><term>Common type</term><term>Complete denture wearers</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Continuous bridge function</term><term>Dent</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture wearers</term><term>Dysfunction</term><term>Fixture</term><term>Force levels</term><term>Front teeth</term><term>Functional occlusion</term><term>Functional rehabilitation</term><term>Gold bridge</term><term>Haraldson</term><term>Hard foods</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant bridges</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular dysfunction</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Masticatory system</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary denture</term><term>Maximal</term><term>Mild dysfunction</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Occlusal state</term><term>Oibs</term><term>Older design</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implant bridges</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other centers</term><term>Overall judgment</term><term>Past history</term><term>Patients index value</term><term>Plast reeonstr surg</term><term>Positive correlation</term><term>Premolar region</term><term>Present study</term><term>Previous examination</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Scand</term><term>Severe symptoms</term><term>Social life</term><term>Stomatognathic physiology</term><term>Stomatognathic system</term><term>Swed dent</term><term>Test level</term><term>Wearer</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract – Twenty‐one patients with osseointegrated implant bridges (OIB), with an average age of 65 yr, were functionally examined at a 10‐yr follow‐up. Altogether 27 OIBs, supported by 138 fixtures, were examined. The examination comprised an anamnestic and clinical examination and registration of bite force. 90% of the patients were very satisfied with the outcome of the treatment. According to the anamnestic dysfunction index (Ai), 80% of the patients were symptom free in their masticatory system. The occlusal state was found to be good. Seventy‐five percent of the patients were found to have only mild dysfunction of their masticatory system or to be symptomless according to the clinical dysfunction index (Di). The bite force ranged from 3 to 118 N at gentle biting, from 25 to 250 N at “biting as when chewing” and from 77.5 to 495.5 N at maximal bite force. On average the bite force had improved significantly at all biteforce levels tested compared to an examination 10 yr earlier. It is concluded that oral function in patients with OIBs is very favorable.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>oibs</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>haraldson</json:string><json:string>dysfunction</json:string><json:string>masticatory</json:string><json:string>scand</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>zarb</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>anamnestic</json:string><json:string>masticatory system</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>carlsson</json:string><json:string>wearer</json:string><json:string>force levels</json:string><json:string>clinical examination</json:string><json:string>aeta odontol scand</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>plast reeonstr surg</json:string><json:string>anamnestic dysfunction index</json:string><json:string>denture wearers</json:string><json:string>complete denture wearers</json:string><json:string>oral function</json:string><json:string>previous examination</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>clinical dysfunction index</json:string><json:string>mild dysfunction</json:string><json:string>masticatory function</json:string><json:string>older design</json:string><json:string>occlusal state</json:string><json:string>stomatognathic system</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>maximal</json:string><json:string>maxillary denture</json:string><json:string>past history</json:string><json:string>observation period</json:string><json:string>severe symptoms</json:string><json:string>other centers</json:string><json:string>overall judgment</json:string><json:string>oral implants</json:string><json:string>social life</json:string><json:string>oral hygiene</json:string><json:string>hard foods</json:string><json:string>front teeth</json:string><json:string>gold bridge</json:string><json:string>acrylic resin</json:string><json:string>biteforce levels</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implant bridges</json:string><json:string>patients index value</json:string><json:string>functional occlusion</json:string><json:string>common number</json:string><json:string>common type</json:string><json:string>continuous bridge function</json:string><json:string>mandibular dysfunction</json:string><json:string>premolar region</json:string><json:string>positive correlation</json:string><json:string>test level</json:string><json:string>clinical symptoms</json:string><json:string>functional rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>stomatognathic physiology</json:string><json:string>implant bridges</json:string><json:string>swed dent</json:string><json:string>clinical dentistry</json:string><json:string>fixture</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>TORGNY HARALDSON</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string><json:string>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Correspondence address: Torgny Haraldson, Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, Box 33070, S‐400 33 Göteborg, Sweden.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>GEORGE ZARB</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada</json:string><json:string>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bite force</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mastication</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osseointegration</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>EOS243</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-GH5FWF7D-F</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract – Twenty‐one patients with osseointegrated implant bridges (OIB), with an average age of 65 yr, were functionally examined at a 10‐yr follow‐up. Altogether 27 OIBs, supported by 138 fixtures, were examined. The examination comprised an anamnestic and clinical examination and registration of bite force. 90% of the patients were very satisfied with the outcome of the treatment. According to the anamnestic dysfunction index (Ai), 80% of the patients were symptom free in their masticatory system. The occlusal state was found to be good. Seventy‐five percent of the patients were found to have only mild dysfunction of their masticatory system or to be symptomless according to the clinical dysfunction index (Di). The bite force ranged from 3 to 118 N at gentle biting, from 25 to 250 N at “biting as when chewing” and from 77.5 to 495.5 N at maximal bite force. On average the bite force had improved significantly at all biteforce levels tested compared to an examination 10 yr earlier. It is concluded that oral function in patients with OIBs is very favorable.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>176</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1075</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><score>7.908</score><pdfWordCount>3796</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>23046</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.6</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>394 x 591 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>A 10‐year follow‐up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>European Journal of Oral Sciences</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0722</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0909-8836</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0722</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>EOS</json:string></publisherId><volume>96</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>243</first><last>252</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1988</json:string><json:string>1984</json:string><json:string>19S</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University of Gothen</json:string><json:string>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Goteborg, Box</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden Haraldson T, Zarb GA</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>I. Median</json:string><json:string>An Mosby</json:string><json:string>I. Reconstruction</json:string><json:string>Verj</json:string><json:string>A. Intratol</json:string><json:string>T. Ocelusal</json:string><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>Table</json:string><json:string>Index</json:string><json:string>Cosmetic</json:string><json:string>T. Func</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Amsterdam</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>University of Gothenburg, 1979</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-GH5FWF7D-F</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>1988</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1988</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01551.x</json:string></doi><id>898AA1F1E0EF35BAA39BD80F8F6F7E1248B6B8F8</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/898AA1F1E0EF35BAA39BD80F8F6F7E1248B6B8F8/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/898AA1F1E0EF35BAA39BD80F8F6F7E1248B6B8F8/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/898AA1F1E0EF35BAA39BD80F8F6F7E1248B6B8F8/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A 10‐year follow‐up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1988-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A 10‐year follow‐up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">TORGNY</forename><surname>HARALDSON</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Torgny Haraldson, Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, Box 33070, S‐400 33 Göteborg, Sweden.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">GEORGE</forename><surname>ZARB</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada<address><country key="CA"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">898AA1F1E0EF35BAA39BD80F8F6F7E1248B6B8F8</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-GH5FWF7D-F</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01551.x</idno><idno type="unit">EOS243</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:EOS.EOS243.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">European Journal of Oral Sciences</title><title level="j" type="alt">EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES</title><idno type="pISSN">0909-8836</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0722</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0722</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/eos.1988.96.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">EOS</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">96</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="243">243</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="252">252</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1988-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract – </hi> Twenty‐one patients with osseointegrated implant bridges (OIB), with an average age of 65 yr, were functionally examined at a 10‐yr follow‐up. Altogether 27 OIBs, supported by 138 fixtures, were examined. The examination comprised an anamnestic and clinical examination and registration of bite force. 90% of the patients were very satisfied with the outcome of the treatment. According to the anamnestic dysfunction index (Ai), 80% of the patients were symptom free in their masticatory system. The occlusal state was found to be good. Seventy‐five percent of the patients were found to have only mild dysfunction of their masticatory system or to be symptomless according to the clinical dysfunction index (Di). The bite force ranged from 3 to 118 N at gentle biting, from 25 to 250 N at “biting as when chewing” and from 77.5 to 495.5 N at maximal bite force. On average the bite force had improved significantly at all biteforce levels tested compared to an examination 10 yr earlier. It is concluded that oral function in patients with OIBs is very favorable.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bite force</term><term xml:id="k2">implants</term><term xml:id="k3">mastication</term><term xml:id="k4">osseointegration</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/898AA1F1E0EF35BAA39BD80F8F6F7E1248B6B8F8/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0722</doi><issn type="print">0909-8836</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0722</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="EOS"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES">European Journal of Oral Sciences</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/eos.1988.96.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="96">96</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1988-06">June 1988</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0024300" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01551.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="EOS243"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-10-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-10-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-24"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="243">243</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="252">252</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Torgny Haraldson, Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, Box 33070, S‐400 33 Göteborg, Sweden.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:EOS.EOS243.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 15 November 1987.</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="30"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A 10‐year follow‐up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a3" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>TORGNY</givenNames><familyName>HARALDSON</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2 #a3"><personName><givenNames>GEORGE</givenNames><familyName>ZARB</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="CA"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bite force</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">mastication</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">osseointegration</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract – </b> Twenty‐one patients with osseointegrated implant bridges (OIB), with an average age of 65 yr, were functionally examined at a 10‐yr follow‐up. Altogether 27 OIBs, supported by 138 fixtures, were examined. The examination comprised an anamnestic and clinical examination and registration of bite force. 90% of the patients were very satisfied with the outcome of the treatment. According to the anamnestic dysfunction index (Ai), 80% of the patients were symptom free in their masticatory system. The occlusal state was found to be good. Seventy‐five percent of the patients were found to have only mild dysfunction of their masticatory system or to be symptomless according to the clinical dysfunction index (Di). The bite force ranged from 3 to 118 N at gentle biting, from 25 to 250 N at “biting as when chewing” and from 77.5 to 495.5 N at maximal bite force. On average the bite force had improved significantly at all biteforce levels tested compared to an examination 10 yr earlier. It is concluded that oral function in patients with OIBs is very favorable.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A 10‐year follow‐up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A 10‐year follow‐up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">TORGNY</namePart><namePart type="family">HARALDSON</namePart><affiliation>Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence address: Torgny Haraldson, Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, Box 33070, S‐400 33 Göteborg, Sweden.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">GEORGE</namePart><namePart type="family">ZARB</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada</affiliation><affiliation>The Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1988-06</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 15 November 1987.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1988</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">30</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">5</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract – Twenty‐one patients with osseointegrated implant bridges (OIB), with an average age of 65 yr, were functionally examined at a 10‐yr follow‐up. Altogether 27 OIBs, supported by 138 fixtures, were examined. The examination comprised an anamnestic and clinical examination and registration of bite force. 90% of the patients were very satisfied with the outcome of the treatment. According to the anamnestic dysfunction index (Ai), 80% of the patients were symptom free in their masticatory system. The occlusal state was found to be good. Seventy‐five percent of the patients were found to have only mild dysfunction of their masticatory system or to be symptomless according to the clinical dysfunction index (Di). The bite force ranged from 3 to 118 N at gentle biting, from 25 to 250 N at “biting as when chewing” and from 77.5 to 495.5 N at maximal bite force. On average the bite force had improved significantly at all biteforce levels tested compared to an examination 10 yr earlier. It is concluded that oral function in patients with OIBs is very favorable.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bite force</topic><topic>implants</topic><topic>mastication</topic><topic>osseointegration</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>European Journal of Oral Sciences</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0909-8836</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0722</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0722</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">EOS</identifier><part><date>1988</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>96</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>243</start><end>252</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">898AA1F1E0EF35BAA39BD80F8F6F7E1248B6B8F8</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-GH5FWF7D-F</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01551.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">EOS243</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/898AA1F1E0EF35BAA39BD80F8F6F7E1248B6B8F8/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004437 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004437 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:898AA1F1E0EF35BAA39BD80F8F6F7E1248B6B8F8
|texte= A 10‐year follow‐up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |