Implant supported overdentures — the Copenhagen experience
Identifieur interne : 004417 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004416; suivant : 004418Implant supported overdentures — the Copenhagen experience
Auteurs : Klaus GotfredsenSource :
- Journal of Dentistry [ 0300-5712 ] ; 1997.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Astra, Astra tech implants, Attachment, Ball attachment, Ball attachments, Biological effect, Denture, Edentulous mandible, Elsevier science, Fracture, Hyperplasia, Implant, Implant abutment, Implants, Marginal bone height, Masseter muscle, Matrix, Osseointegrated implants, Other studies, Overdenture, Overdenture group, Overdenture treatment, Overdentures, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis group, Technical complications, Upper denture, Year observation period.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Astra, Astra tech implants, Ball attachment, Ball attachments, Biological effect, Denture, Edentulous mandible, Elsevier science, Fracture, Hyperplasia, Implant, Implant abutment, Marginal bone height, Masseter muscle, Matrix, Osseointegrated implants, Other studies, Overdenture, Overdenture group, Overdenture treatment, Overdentures, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis group, Technical complications, Upper denture, Year observation period.
Abstract
Abstract: Objetives: To evaluate the functional and biological effect of implant-supported overdenture treatment in the lower jaw.Methds and Materials: Thirty two patients were consecutively treated with Astra Tech implants in the lower jaw for retaining overdentures. All implants had a diameter of 3.5 mm and all but two of the implants were longer than 10 mm. For the implant supported overdentures two methods of attachment were used, a bar or a ball.Results: One of 69 fixtures was lost during the 4–5 year observation period. The mean bone loss for all fixtures was less than 0.2 mm per year. Complications included 15 fractures of the ball attachment and 26 episodes of looseness of the matrices holding the screw in place. Patient satisfaction with the treatment of the lower jaw was high although 7 patients found that control of the upper denture was poor following treatment.Conclusions: When the bone quality and quantity is sufficient, two implants can support an overdenture in the lower jaw, providing prosthesis which functions well.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(97)87699-3
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:891F448F6FF8FC8B734644ABC8F7CD6ECFC40BABLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant supported overdentures — the Copenhagen experience</title><author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, Klaus" sort="Gotfredsen, Klaus" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="Klaus" last="Gotfredsen">Klaus Gotfredsen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:891F448F6FF8FC8B734644ABC8F7CD6ECFC40BAB</idno><date when="1997" year="1997">1997</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0300-5712(97)87699-3</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/891F448F6FF8FC8B734644ABC8F7CD6ECFC40BAB/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004417</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004417</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Implant supported overdentures — the Copenhagen experience</title><author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, Klaus" sort="Gotfredsen, Klaus" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="Klaus" last="Gotfredsen">Klaus Gotfredsen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JJOD</title><idno type="ISSN">0300-5712</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1997">1997</date><biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">I1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="S39">S39</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="S42">S42</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0300-5712</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0300-5712</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech implants</term><term>Attachment</term><term>Ball attachment</term><term>Ball attachments</term><term>Biological effect</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Elsevier science</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Hyperplasia</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant abutment</term><term>Implants</term><term>Marginal bone height</term><term>Masseter muscle</term><term>Matrix</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture group</term><term>Overdenture treatment</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis group</term><term>Technical complications</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Year observation period</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech implants</term><term>Ball attachment</term><term>Ball attachments</term><term>Biological effect</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Elsevier science</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Hyperplasia</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant abutment</term><term>Marginal bone height</term><term>Masseter muscle</term><term>Matrix</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture group</term><term>Overdenture treatment</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis group</term><term>Technical complications</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Year observation period</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Objetives: To evaluate the functional and biological effect of implant-supported overdenture treatment in the lower jaw.Methds and Materials: Thirty two patients were consecutively treated with Astra Tech implants in the lower jaw for retaining overdentures. All implants had a diameter of 3.5 mm and all but two of the implants were longer than 10 mm. For the implant supported overdentures two methods of attachment were used, a bar or a ball.Results: One of 69 fixtures was lost during the 4–5 year observation period. The mean bone loss for all fixtures was less than 0.2 mm per year. Complications included 15 fractures of the ball attachment and 26 episodes of looseness of the matrices holding the screw in place. Patient satisfaction with the treatment of the lower jaw was high although 7 patients found that control of the upper denture was poor following treatment.Conclusions: When the bone quality and quantity is sufficient, two implants can support an overdenture in the lower jaw, providing prosthesis which functions well.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>overdenture group</json:string><json:string>astra tech implants</json:string><json:string>matrix</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>astra</json:string><json:string>upper denture</json:string><json:string>overdenture treatment</json:string><json:string>ball attachments</json:string><json:string>marginal bone height</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandible</json:string><json:string>year observation period</json:string><json:string>implant abutment</json:string><json:string>elsevier science</json:string><json:string>masseter muscle</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>ball attachment</json:string><json:string>technical complications</json:string><json:string>other studies</json:string><json:string>biological effect</json:string><json:string>prosthesis group</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>hyperplasia</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Klaus Gotfredsen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Overdentures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Attachment</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>87699</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-G3J7GCDS-W</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Objetives: To evaluate the functional and biological effect of implant-supported overdenture treatment in the lower jaw.Methds and Materials: Thirty two patients were consecutively treated with Astra Tech implants in the lower jaw for retaining overdentures. All implants had a diameter of 3.5 mm and all but two of the implants were longer than 10 mm. For the implant supported overdentures two methods of attachment were used, a bar or a ball.Results: One of 69 fixtures was lost during the 4–5 year observation period. The mean bone loss for all fixtures was less than 0.2 mm per year. Complications included 15 fractures of the ball attachment and 26 episodes of looseness of the matrices holding the screw in place. Patient satisfaction with the treatment of the lower jaw was high although 7 patients found that control of the upper denture was poor following treatment.Conclusions: When the bone quality and quantity is sufficient, two implants can support an overdenture in the lower jaw, providing prosthesis which functions well.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>167</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1049</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount><score>5.802</score><pdfWordCount>1798</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>10973</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>4</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 790 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Implant supported overdentures — the Copenhagen experience</title><pmid><json:string>9080751</json:string></pmid><pii><json:string>S0300-5712(97)87699-3</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Dentistry</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0300-5712</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0300-5712(99)X0000-5</json:string></pii><volume>25</volume><pages><first>S39</first><last>S42</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1997</json:string><json:string>3</json:string><json:string>1989</json:string><json:string>4</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Zarb</json:string><json:string>Hyperplasia</json:string><json:string>Meijer</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Copenhagen</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-G3J7GCDS-W</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - otorhinolaryngologie. stomatologie</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1997</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/S0300-5712(97)87699-3</json:string></doi><id>891F448F6FF8FC8B734644ABC8F7CD6ECFC40BAB</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/891F448F6FF8FC8B734644ABC8F7CD6ECFC40BAB/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/891F448F6FF8FC8B734644ABC8F7CD6ECFC40BAB/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/891F448F6FF8FC8B734644ABC8F7CD6ECFC40BAB/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Implant supported overdentures — the Copenhagen experience</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1997</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Implant supported overdentures — the Copenhagen experience</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Klaus</forename><surname>Gotfredsen</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">891F448F6FF8FC8B734644ABC8F7CD6ECFC40BAB</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0300-5712(97)87699-3</idno><idno type="PII">S0300-5712(97)87699-3</idno><idno type="ArticleID">87699</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JJOD</title><idno type="pISSN">0300-5712</idno><idno type="PII">S0300-5712(99)X0000-5</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1997"></date><biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">I1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="S39">S39</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="S42">S42</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1997</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Objetives: To evaluate the functional and biological effect of implant-supported overdenture treatment in the lower jaw.Methds and Materials: Thirty two patients were consecutively treated with Astra Tech implants in the lower jaw for retaining overdentures. All implants had a diameter of 3.5 mm and all but two of the implants were longer than 10 mm. For the implant supported overdentures two methods of attachment were used, a bar or a ball.Results: One of 69 fixtures was lost during the 4–5 year observation period. The mean bone loss for all fixtures was less than 0.2 mm per year. Complications included 15 fractures of the ball attachment and 26 episodes of looseness of the matrices holding the screw in place. Patient satisfaction with the treatment of the lower jaw was high although 7 patients found that control of the upper denture was poor following treatment.Conclusions: When the bone quality and quantity is sufficient, two implants can support an overdenture in the lower jaw, providing prosthesis which functions well.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Key Words</head><item><term>Overdentures</term></item><item><term>Implants</term></item><item><term>Attachment</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1997">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/891F448F6FF8FC8B734644ABC8F7CD6ECFC40BAB/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier doc found" wicri:toSee="Elsevier, no converted or simple article"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" </istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 5.1.0//EN//XML" URI="art510.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article version="5.1" xml:lang="en" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>JJOD</jid><aid>87699</aid><ce:pii>S0300-5712(97)87699-3</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/S0300-5712(97)87699-3</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1997"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:title>Implant supported overdentures — the Copenhagen experience</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Klaus</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Gotfredsen</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation></ce:author-group><ce:abstract id="ab1"><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para id="SP0005"><ce:italic>Objetives:</ce:italic> To evaluate the functional and biological effect of implant-supported overdenture treatment in the lower jaw.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para id="SP0010"><ce:italic>Methds and Materials:</ce:italic> Thirty two patients were consecutively treated with Astra Tech implants in the lower jaw for retaining overdentures. All implants had a diameter of 3.5 mm and all but two of the implants were longer than 10 mm. For the implant supported overdentures two methods of attachment were used, a bar or a ball.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para id="SP0015"><ce:italic>Results:</ce:italic> One of 69 fixtures was lost during the 4–5 year observation period. The mean bone loss for all fixtures was less than 0.2 mm per year. Complications included 15 fractures of the ball attachment and 26 episodes of looseness of the matrices holding the screw in place. Patient satisfaction with the treatment of the lower jaw was high although 7 patients found that control of the upper denture was poor following treatment.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para id="SP0020"><ce:italic>Conclusions:</ce:italic> When the bone quality and quantity is sufficient, two implants can support an overdenture in the lower jaw, providing prosthesis which functions well.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract><ce:keywords class="keyword"><ce:section-title>Key Words</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>Overdentures</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Implants</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Attachment</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords></head><tail><ce:bibliography id="R0005"><ce:section-title>References</ce:section-title><ce:bibliography-sec id="RS0005"><ce:bib-reference id="bib1"><ce:label>1.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Engquist</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Bergendal</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Kallus</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>L</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Linden</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implanls</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>3</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1983</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>129</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>134</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib2"><ce:label>2.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>KW</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Hemmings</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Schmitt</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>GA</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Zarb</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Complications and maintenance requirements for fixed prostheses and overdentures in the edentulous mandible: A 5-year report</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>9</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1994</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>191</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>196</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib3"><ce:label>3.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Mericske-Stern</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>TS</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Schaffner</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>P</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Marti</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>AH</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Geering</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Peru-implant mucosal aspects of ITI implants supporting overdentures. A five-year longitudinal study</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>clin Oral Impl Res</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>5</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1994</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>9</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>18</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib4"><ce:label>4.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>K</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Gorfredsen</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Holm</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>I</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Sewerin</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>F</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Harder</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>E</ce:given-name><ce:surname>HjørtingHansen</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>CS</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Pedersen</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>K</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Christensen</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Marginal tissue response adjacent to ASTRA dental implants supporting overdentures in the mandible. A 2-year follow-up study</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Clin Oral Impl Res</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>4</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1993</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>83</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>89</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib5"><ce:label>5.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>JS</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Feine</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>P</ce:given-name><ce:surname>de Grandmont</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>P</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Boudrias</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>N</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Brien</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>C</ce:given-name><ce:surname>LaMarche</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>R</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Taché</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>JP</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Lund</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: choice of prosthesis</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Dent Res</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>73</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1994</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>1105</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>1111</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib6"><ce:label>6.</ce:label><sb:reference><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>HJA</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Meijer</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>HM</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Starmans</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>WHA</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Steen</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>F</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Bosman</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>A three-dimensional finite clement study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Int J Prosthodont</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>7</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1994</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>271</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>2798</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference></ce:bibliography-sec></ce:bibliography></tail></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Implant supported overdentures — the Copenhagen experience</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Implant supported overdentures — the Copenhagen experience</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Klaus</namePart><namePart type="family">Gotfredsen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1997</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: Objetives: To evaluate the functional and biological effect of implant-supported overdenture treatment in the lower jaw.Methds and Materials: Thirty two patients were consecutively treated with Astra Tech implants in the lower jaw for retaining overdentures. All implants had a diameter of 3.5 mm and all but two of the implants were longer than 10 mm. For the implant supported overdentures two methods of attachment were used, a bar or a ball.Results: One of 69 fixtures was lost during the 4–5 year observation period. The mean bone loss for all fixtures was less than 0.2 mm per year. Complications included 15 fractures of the ball attachment and 26 episodes of looseness of the matrices holding the screw in place. Patient satisfaction with the treatment of the lower jaw was high although 7 patients found that control of the upper denture was poor following treatment.Conclusions: When the bone quality and quantity is sufficient, two implants can support an overdenture in the lower jaw, providing prosthesis which functions well.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>Key Words</genre><topic>Overdentures</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Attachment</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Dentistry</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>JJOD</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0300-5712</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0300-5712(99)X0000-5</identifier><part><date>1997</date><detail type="volume"><number>25</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="supplement"><number>I1</number><caption>Suppl.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>S1</start><end>S47</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>S39</start><end>S42</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">891F448F6FF8FC8B734644ABC8F7CD6ECFC40BAB</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-G3J7GCDS-W</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/S0300-5712(97)87699-3</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0300-5712(97)87699-3</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">87699</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/891F448F6FF8FC8B734644ABC8F7CD6ECFC40BAB/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004417 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004417 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:891F448F6FF8FC8B734644ABC8F7CD6ECFC40BAB
|texte= Implant supported overdentures — the Copenhagen experience
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |