EdenteV2, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 004394

A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability

Identifieur interne : 004394 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004393; suivant : 004395

A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability

Auteurs : Mandana Hosseini ; Klaus Gotfredsen

Source :

Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2012-04.

RBID : ISTEX:88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F

English descriptors

Abstract

Objectives: To test the reliability and validity of six aesthetic parameters and to compare the professional‐ and patient‐reported aesthetic outcomes.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02162.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability</title>
<author><name sortKey="Hosseini, Mandana" sort="Hosseini, Mandana" uniqKey="Hosseini M" first="Mandana" last="Hosseini">Mandana Hosseini</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, Klaus" sort="Gotfredsen, Klaus" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="Klaus" last="Gotfredsen">Klaus Gotfredsen</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F</idno>
<date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02162.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004394</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004394</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability</title>
<author><name sortKey="Hosseini, Mandana" sort="Hosseini, Mandana" uniqKey="Hosseini M" first="Mandana" last="Hosseini">Mandana Hosseini</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gotfredsen, Klaus" sort="Gotfredsen, Klaus" uniqKey="Gotfredsen K" first="Klaus" last="Gotfredsen">Klaus Gotfredsen</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="453">453</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="458">458</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2012-04">2012-04</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aesthetic index</term>
<term>Aesthetic ohip questions</term>
<term>Aesthetic outcome</term>
<term>Aesthetic outcomes</term>
<term>Aesthetic parameters</term>
<term>Aesthetic quality evaluation</term>
<term>Aesthetic result</term>
<term>Aesthetic zone</term>
<term>Aesthetics</term>
<term>Anatomic form</term>
<term>Anterior maxillary restorations</term>
<term>Anterior region</term>
<term>Astra tech</term>
<term>Belser</term>
<term>Categorical scale</term>
<term>Chang</term>
<term>Clinical assessment</term>
<term>Clinical guidelines</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Clinical settings</term>
<term>Clinical trial</term>
<term>Colour</term>
<term>Contralateral tooth</term>
<term>Convergent validity</term>
<term>Copenhagen index score</term>
<term>Crown colour</term>
<term>Crown morphology</term>
<term>Crown morphology crown colour</term>
<term>Crown morphology score</term>
<term>Dental care</term>
<term>Dental restorations</term>
<term>Dental school</term>
<term>Dental students</term>
<term>Dental traumatology</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Discolouration</term>
<term>Distal papilla</term>
<term>Distally papilla index score</term>
<term>Esthetic outcome</term>
<term>Facial aesthetics</term>
<term>Gehrke</term>
<term>Gotfredsen</term>
<term>Gotfredsen walls</term>
<term>Hosseini</term>
<term>Hosseini gotfredsen</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant crown</term>
<term>Implant dentistry</term>
<term>Implant restorations</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>Internal consistency</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Intraand agreement</term>
<term>Jemt</term>
<term>John wiley sons hosseini gotfredsen</term>
<term>Juodzbalys wang</term>
<term>Mandana hosseini</term>
<term>Meijer</term>
<term>Moderate agreement</term>
<term>Morphology</term>
<term>Mucosal</term>
<term>Mucosal discolouration mesial papilla</term>
<term>Mucosal discolouration score</term>
<term>Neighbouring teeth</term>
<term>Observer agreement</term>
<term>Ohip</term>
<term>Oral health impact</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Other parameters</term>
<term>Papilla</term>
<term>Papilla index score</term>
<term>Papilla index scores</term>
<term>Parameter</term>
<term>Premolar</term>
<term>Premolar crowns</term>
<term>Premolar region</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthetic treatments</term>
<term>Prosthodontic patients</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Prosthodontist</term>
<term>Proximal space</term>
<term>Quality control</term>
<term>Quality evaluation</term>
<term>Rating systems</term>
<term>Reliability</term>
<term>Restorative dentistry</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Several subparameters</term>
<term>Single crowns</term>
<term>Soft tissue</term>
<term>Spearman correlation</term>
<term>Streiner norman</term>
<term>Student assessment</term>
<term>Summary scores</term>
<term>Titanium implant abutments</term>
<term>Tooth agenesis</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Aesthetic index</term>
<term>Aesthetic ohip questions</term>
<term>Aesthetic outcome</term>
<term>Aesthetic outcomes</term>
<term>Aesthetic parameters</term>
<term>Aesthetic quality evaluation</term>
<term>Aesthetic result</term>
<term>Aesthetic zone</term>
<term>Aesthetics</term>
<term>Anatomic form</term>
<term>Anterior maxillary restorations</term>
<term>Anterior region</term>
<term>Astra tech</term>
<term>Belser</term>
<term>Categorical scale</term>
<term>Chang</term>
<term>Clinical assessment</term>
<term>Clinical guidelines</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Clinical settings</term>
<term>Clinical trial</term>
<term>Colour</term>
<term>Contralateral tooth</term>
<term>Convergent validity</term>
<term>Copenhagen index score</term>
<term>Crown colour</term>
<term>Crown morphology</term>
<term>Crown morphology crown colour</term>
<term>Crown morphology score</term>
<term>Dental care</term>
<term>Dental restorations</term>
<term>Dental school</term>
<term>Dental students</term>
<term>Dental traumatology</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Discolouration</term>
<term>Distal papilla</term>
<term>Distally papilla index score</term>
<term>Esthetic outcome</term>
<term>Facial aesthetics</term>
<term>Gehrke</term>
<term>Gotfredsen</term>
<term>Gotfredsen walls</term>
<term>Hosseini</term>
<term>Hosseini gotfredsen</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant crown</term>
<term>Implant dentistry</term>
<term>Implant restorations</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>Internal consistency</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Intraand agreement</term>
<term>Jemt</term>
<term>John wiley sons hosseini gotfredsen</term>
<term>Juodzbalys wang</term>
<term>Mandana hosseini</term>
<term>Meijer</term>
<term>Moderate agreement</term>
<term>Morphology</term>
<term>Mucosal</term>
<term>Mucosal discolouration mesial papilla</term>
<term>Mucosal discolouration score</term>
<term>Neighbouring teeth</term>
<term>Observer agreement</term>
<term>Ohip</term>
<term>Oral health impact</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Other parameters</term>
<term>Papilla</term>
<term>Papilla index score</term>
<term>Papilla index scores</term>
<term>Parameter</term>
<term>Premolar</term>
<term>Premolar crowns</term>
<term>Premolar region</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthetic treatments</term>
<term>Prosthodontic patients</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Prosthodontist</term>
<term>Proximal space</term>
<term>Quality control</term>
<term>Quality evaluation</term>
<term>Rating systems</term>
<term>Reliability</term>
<term>Restorative dentistry</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Several subparameters</term>
<term>Single crowns</term>
<term>Soft tissue</term>
<term>Spearman correlation</term>
<term>Streiner norman</term>
<term>Student assessment</term>
<term>Summary scores</term>
<term>Titanium implant abutments</term>
<term>Tooth agenesis</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Objectives: To test the reliability and validity of six aesthetic parameters and to compare the professional‐ and patient‐reported aesthetic outcomes.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>papilla</json:string>
<json:string>colour</json:string>
<json:string>implant</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontist</json:string>
<json:string>mucosal</json:string>
<json:string>discolouration</json:string>
<json:string>aesthetic outcome</json:string>
<json:string>gotfredsen</json:string>
<json:string>aesthetic outcomes</json:string>
<json:string>present study</json:string>
<json:string>ohip</json:string>
<json:string>papilla index score</json:string>
<json:string>implants research</json:string>
<json:string>aesthetic parameters</json:string>
<json:string>quality evaluation</json:string>
<json:string>dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>belser</json:string>
<json:string>mucosal discolouration score</json:string>
<json:string>international journal</json:string>
<json:string>jemt</json:string>
<json:string>premolar</json:string>
<json:string>hosseini</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic</json:string>
<json:string>crown morphology</json:string>
<json:string>gehrke</json:string>
<json:string>crown morphology score</json:string>
<json:string>chang</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontics</json:string>
<json:string>meijer</json:string>
<json:string>single crowns</json:string>
<json:string>oral impl</json:string>
<json:string>neighbouring teeth</json:string>
<json:string>soft tissue</json:string>
<json:string>crown colour</json:string>
<json:string>morphology</json:string>
<json:string>reliability</json:string>
<json:string>tooth agenesis</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>copenhagen index score</json:string>
<json:string>implant dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>aesthetic result</json:string>
<json:string>anterior region</json:string>
<json:string>summary scores</json:string>
<json:string>clinical trial</json:string>
<json:string>juodzbalys wang</json:string>
<json:string>aesthetics</json:string>
<json:string>implant crown</json:string>
<json:string>rating systems</json:string>
<json:string>internal consistency</json:string>
<json:string>mucosal discolouration mesial papilla</json:string>
<json:string>student assessment</json:string>
<json:string>quality control</json:string>
<json:string>streiner norman</json:string>
<json:string>oral health impact</json:string>
<json:string>hosseini gotfredsen</json:string>
<json:string>implant restorations</json:string>
<json:string>parameter</json:string>
<json:string>john wiley sons hosseini gotfredsen</json:string>
<json:string>anatomic form</json:string>
<json:string>aesthetic quality evaluation</json:string>
<json:string>several subparameters</json:string>
<json:string>clinical guidelines</json:string>
<json:string>contralateral tooth</json:string>
<json:string>proximal space</json:string>
<json:string>dental students</json:string>
<json:string>astra tech</json:string>
<json:string>intraand agreement</json:string>
<json:string>premolar crowns</json:string>
<json:string>convergent validity</json:string>
<json:string>gotfredsen walls</json:string>
<json:string>aesthetic ohip questions</json:string>
<json:string>distally papilla index score</json:string>
<json:string>observer agreement</json:string>
<json:string>moderate agreement</json:string>
<json:string>crown morphology crown colour</json:string>
<json:string>spearman correlation</json:string>
<json:string>dental care</json:string>
<json:string>papilla index scores</json:string>
<json:string>distal papilla</json:string>
<json:string>restorative dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>premolar region</json:string>
<json:string>clinical assessment</json:string>
<json:string>anterior maxillary restorations</json:string>
<json:string>other parameters</json:string>
<json:string>clinical settings</json:string>
<json:string>aesthetic zone</json:string>
<json:string>dental school</json:string>
<json:string>facial aesthetics</json:string>
<json:string>categorical scale</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic treatments</json:string>
<json:string>prosthodontic patients</json:string>
<json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string>
<json:string>retrospective study</json:string>
<json:string>mandana hosseini</json:string>
<json:string>aesthetic index</json:string>
<json:string>esthetic outcome</json:string>
<json:string>dental traumatology</json:string>
<json:string>dental restorations</json:string>
<json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>titanium implant abutments</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>Mandana Hosseini</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Klaus Gotfredsen</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>aesthetic index</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>agenesis</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>patient</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>single‐tooth implants</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId><json:string>CLR2162</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-V6V1FRD6-T</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Objectives: To test the reliability and validity of six aesthetic parameters and to compare the professional‐ and patient‐reported aesthetic outcomes.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>20</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>150</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>4</keywordCount>
<score>7.24</score>
<pdfWordCount>5096</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>34658</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability</title>
<pmid><json:string>21443589</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre><json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string>
</doi>
<issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>23</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<pages><first>453</first>
<last>458</last>
<total>6</total>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string>
<json:string>2004</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName><json:string>California Dental Association</json:string>
<json:string>N Denmark Tel</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Biostatistics</json:string>
<json:string>DDS Department of Oral Rehabilitation School of Dentistry Faculty of Health Sciences University of Copenhagen</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>Studies</json:string>
<json:string>John Wiley</json:string>
<json:string>Skovgaard</json:string>
<json:string>The</json:string>
<json:string>Associate Professor</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>Copenhagen</json:string>
<json:string>Sweden</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl><json:string>Koch (1977)</json:string>
<json:string>Kourkouta et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Hess et al. 1998</json:string>
<json:string>Testori et al. (2005)</json:string>
<json:string>Meijndert et al. 2007</json:string>
<json:string>Furhauser et al. (2005)</json:string>
<json:string>Sjogren et al. 1992</json:string>
<json:string>Chang et al. (1999)</json:string>
<json:string>Belser et al. (2009)</json:string>
<json:string>Wong et al. 2007</json:string>
<json:string>Gjrup & Svensson 2006</json:string>
<json:string>Larsson et al. 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Belser et al. 2004</json:string>
<json:string>Furhauser et al. 2005</json:string>
<json:string>Belser et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Larsson et al. (2010)</json:string>
<json:string>Chang et al. 1999</json:string>
<json:string>Dueled et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Slade & Spencer 1994</json:string>
<json:string>Park et al. 2007</json:string>
<json:string>Haselton et al. (2000)</json:string>
<json:string>Gotfredsen & Walls 2007</json:string>
<json:string>Streiner & Norman 2008</json:string>
<json:string>Glantz et al. 1984</json:string>
<json:string>Holm et al. 2003</json:string>
<json:string>Juodzbalys & Wang 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Kiekens et al. 2005</json:string>
<json:string>Zembic et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Meijer et al. 2005</json:string>
<json:string>Jemt 1997</json:string>
<json:string>Hirsch & Brisman 1994</json:string>
<json:string>Sailer et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Widbom et al. 2004</json:string>
<json:string>Gotfredsen 2004</json:string>
<json:string>Gehrke et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Jung et al. 2008</json:string>
<json:string>Bengazi et al. (1996)</json:string>
<json:string>Jemt (1997)</json:string>
<json:string>Czochrowska et al. (2002)</json:string>
<json:string>Cehreli et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Koele & Hoogstraten 1999</json:string>
<json:string>Finne et al. 2007</json:string>
<json:string>Meijer et al. (2005)</json:string>
<json:string>Gehrke et al. 2008</json:string>
<json:string>Jung et al. 2007</json:string>
<json:string>California Dental Association 1977</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-V6V1FRD6-T</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string>
</scopus>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2012</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02162.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability><licence>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="2012-04"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability</title>
<title level="a" type="short">Aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Mandana</forename>
<surname>Hosseini</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark<address><country key="DK"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Klaus</forename>
<surname>Gotfredsen</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark<address><country key="DK"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-V6V1FRD6-T</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02162.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">CLR2162</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2162.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-4</idno>
<idno type="product">CLR</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="453">453</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="458">458</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2012-04"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head>
<p><hi rend="bold">Objectives: </hi>
 To test the reliability and validity of six aesthetic parameters and to compare the professional‐ and patient‐reported aesthetic outcomes.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi>
 Thirty‐four patients with 66 implant‐supported premolar crowns were included. Two prosthodontists and 11 dental students evaluated six aesthetic parameters, the Copenhagen Index Score (CIS): (i) crown morphology score, (ii) crown colour match score, (iii) symmetry/harmony score, (iv) mucosal discolouration score, (v) papilla index score, mesially and (vi) papilla index score, distally. The intra‐ and inter‐observer agreement and the internal consistency were analysed by Cohen's κ and Cronbach's α, respectively. The validity of CIS parameters was tested against the corresponding Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) scores. The Spearman correlation coefficients were used. Six aesthetic Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) questions were correlated to the CIS and the overall VAS scores.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi>
 The intra‐observer agreement was >70% in 2/3 and >50% in all observations. The inter‐observed agreement was >50% in 4/5 of all observations. The mucosal discolouration score had the overall highest observed agreement followed by the papilla index scores. The crown morphology and the symmetry/harmony scores had the overall lowest agreement. The Cronbach α value was over 0.8 for all observers. All CIS scores demonstrated significant (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>
<0.0001) correlation to the corresponding VAS scores. Low correlation coefficients (CIS/OHIP: <hi rend="italic">r</hi>
<hi rend="subscript">s</hi>
<0.36; VAS/OHIP: <hi rend="italic">r</hi>
<hi rend="subscript">s</hi>
 >−0,24) were found between patient and professional evaluations.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi>
 The feasibility, reliability and validity of the CIS make the parameters useful for quality control of implant‐supported restorations. The professional‐ and patient‐reported aesthetic outcomes had no significant correlation.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
 Hosseini M, Gotfredsen K. A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability. <hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>
. <hi rend="bold">23</hi>
, 2012 453–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02162.x</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">aesthetic index</term>
<term xml:id="k2">agenesis</term>
<term xml:id="k3">patient</term>
<term xml:id="k4">single‐tooth implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi>
<issn type="print">0905-7161</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn>
<idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="04104"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-4</doi>
<copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="23">23</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue">4</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2012-04">April 2012</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="10" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02162.x</doi>
<idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2162"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright>
<eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.9.1 mode:FullText" date="2011-11-15"></event>
<event agent="SPS" date="2012-03-05" type="xmlCorrected"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-03-28"></event>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2011-03-28"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-03-07"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">453</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast">458</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
 Mandana Hosseini, DDS Department of Oral Rehabilitation School of Dentistry Faculty of Health Sciences University of Copenhagen 20 Nørre Allé 20 DK‐2200 Copenhagen N Denmark Tel.: 45 3532 6529 Fax: 45 3532 6505 e‐mail: <email normalForm="mandana.hosseini@sund.ku.dk">mandana.hosseini@sund.ku.dk</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2162.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b>
, Accepted 18 December 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory>
<countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="5"></count>
<count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="41"></count>
<count type="wordTotal" number="6971"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="61"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main">A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">Hosseini & Gotfredsen</title>
<title type="short">Aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Mandana</givenNames>
<familyName>Hosseini</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Klaus</givenNames>
<familyName>Gotfredsen</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="DK"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">aesthetic index</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">agenesis</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">patient</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k4">single‐tooth implants</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title>
<p><b>Objectives: </b>
 To test the reliability and validity of six aesthetic parameters and to compare the professional‐ and patient‐reported aesthetic outcomes.</p>
<p><b>Material and methods: </b>
 Thirty‐four patients with 66 implant‐supported premolar crowns were included. Two prosthodontists and 11 dental students evaluated six aesthetic parameters, the Copenhagen Index Score (CIS): (i) crown morphology score, (ii) crown colour match score, (iii) symmetry/harmony score, (iv) mucosal discolouration score, (v) papilla index score, mesially and (vi) papilla index score, distally. The intra‐ and inter‐observer agreement and the internal consistency were analysed by Cohen's κ and Cronbach's α, respectively. The validity of CIS parameters was tested against the corresponding Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) scores. The Spearman correlation coefficients were used. Six aesthetic Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) questions were correlated to the CIS and the overall VAS scores.</p>
<p><b>Results: </b>
 The intra‐observer agreement was >70% in 2/3 and >50% in all observations. The inter‐observed agreement was >50% in 4/5 of all observations. The mucosal discolouration score had the overall highest observed agreement followed by the papilla index scores. The crown morphology and the symmetry/harmony scores had the overall lowest agreement. The Cronbach α value was over 0.8 for all observers. All CIS scores demonstrated significant (<i>P</i>
<0.0001) correlation to the corresponding VAS scores. Low correlation coefficients (CIS/OHIP: <i>r</i>
<sub>s</sub>
<0.36; VAS/OHIP: <i>r</i>
<sub>s</sub>
 >−0,24) were found between patient and professional evaluations.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions: </b>
 The feasibility, reliability and validity of the CIS make the parameters useful for quality control of implant‐supported restorations. The professional‐ and patient‐reported aesthetic outcomes had no significant correlation.</p>
<p><b>To cite this article:</b>
 Hosseini M, Gotfredsen K. A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability. <i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>
. <b>23</b>
, 2012 453–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02162.x</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mandana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hosseini</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Klaus</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gotfredsen</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-04</dateIssued>
<edition>Date:, Accepted 18 December 2010</edition>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">1</extent>
<extent unit="tables">5</extent>
<extent unit="formulas">0</extent>
<extent unit="references">41</extent>
<extent unit="linksCrossRef">61</extent>
<extent unit="words">6971</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract>Objectives: To test the reliability and validity of six aesthetic parameters and to compare the professional‐ and patient‐reported aesthetic outcomes.</abstract>
<abstract>Material and methods: Thirty‐four patients with 66 implant‐supported premolar crowns were included. Two prosthodontists and 11 dental students evaluated six aesthetic parameters, the Copenhagen Index Score (CIS): (i) crown morphology score, (ii) crown colour match score, (iii) symmetry/harmony score, (iv) mucosal discolouration score, (v) papilla index score, mesially and (vi) papilla index score, distally. The intra‐ and inter‐observer agreement and the internal consistency were analysed by Cohen's κ and Cronbach's α, respectively. The validity of CIS parameters was tested against the corresponding Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) scores. The Spearman correlation coefficients were used. Six aesthetic Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) questions were correlated to the CIS and the overall VAS scores.</abstract>
<abstract>Results: The intra‐observer agreement was >70% in 2/3 and >50% in all observations. The inter‐observed agreement was >50% in 4/5 of all observations. The mucosal discolouration score had the overall highest observed agreement followed by the papilla index scores. The crown morphology and the symmetry/harmony scores had the overall lowest agreement. The Cronbach α value was over 0.8 for all observers. All CIS scores demonstrated significant (P<0.0001) correlation to the corresponding VAS scores. Low correlation coefficients (CIS/OHIP: rs<0.36; VAS/OHIP: rs >−0,24) were found between patient and professional evaluations.</abstract>
<abstract>Conclusions: The feasibility, reliability and validity of the CIS make the parameters useful for quality control of implant‐supported restorations. The professional‐ and patient‐reported aesthetic outcomes had no significant correlation.</abstract>
<abstract>To cite this article: Hosseini M, Gotfredsen K. A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012 453–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02162.x</abstract>
<subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>aesthetic index</topic>
<topic>agenesis</topic>
<topic>patient</topic>
<topic>single‐tooth implants</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier>
<part><date>2012</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>23</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>4</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>453</start>
<end>458</end>
<total>6</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-V6V1FRD6-T</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02162.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2162</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004394 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004394 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:88C4E4267D98646E401EA3B359157E01880E0E6F
   |texte=   A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability

A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri