Resistance to Wear of Four Matrices with Ball Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Fatigue Study
Identifieur interne : 004260 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004259; suivant : 004261Resistance to Wear of Four Matrices with Ball Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Fatigue Study
Auteurs : Roberto Branchi ; Dario Vangi ; Antonio Virga ; Genevieve Guertin ; Giovanni FaziSource :
- Journal of Prosthodontics [ 1059-941X ] ; 2010-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acrylic resin, Alloy, American college, Attachment, Attachment system, Attachment systems, Ball attachment, Ball attachments, Ball attachments branchi, Ball patrices, Ball patrix, Clinical trial, Continuous loss, Dent, Dental implants, Dental literature, Different matrices, Different time cycles, Dimensional analysis, Dimensional changes, Fatigue studies, Fatigue testing, Highest retention values, Implant, Implant angulation, Implant overdenture attachments, Implant overdentures, Insertion, Load transfer, Major axis, Mandibular implant overdentures, Mandibular overdentures, Martina, Matrix, Matrix components, Mechanical engineering, Metal housing, Noble alloy, Noble alloy group, Noble alloy matrices, Noble alloy matrix, Oral rehabil, Other hand, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Patrix, Plastic adaptation, Present study, Progressive decrease, Progressive loss, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthodont, Retention, Retention force, Retention loss, Retention value, Retention values, Same type, Specimen holders, Spherical attachments, Statistical analysis, Sweden martina, Testing machine, Titanium, Titanium group, Titanium matrices, Titanium matrix.
- Teeft :
- Acrylic resin, Alloy, American college, Attachment, Attachment system, Attachment systems, Ball attachment, Ball attachments, Ball attachments branchi, Ball patrices, Ball patrix, Clinical trial, Continuous loss, Dent, Dental implants, Dental literature, Different matrices, Different time cycles, Dimensional analysis, Dimensional changes, Fatigue studies, Fatigue testing, Highest retention values, Implant, Implant angulation, Implant overdenture attachments, Implant overdentures, Insertion, Load transfer, Major axis, Mandibular implant overdentures, Mandibular overdentures, Martina, Matrix, Matrix components, Mechanical engineering, Metal housing, Noble alloy, Noble alloy group, Noble alloy matrices, Noble alloy matrix, Oral rehabil, Other hand, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Patrix, Plastic adaptation, Present study, Progressive decrease, Progressive loss, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthodont, Retention, Retention force, Retention loss, Retention value, Retention values, Same type, Specimen holders, Spherical attachments, Statistical analysis, Sweden martina, Testing machine, Titanium, Titanium group, Titanium matrices, Titanium matrix.
Abstract
Purpose: The study evaluated in vitro the retention force and the wear resistance over simulated function of four matrix components of ball attachments for implant‐retained overdentures.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00613.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:8635A57FEE5EFF002FE6AF80052284AAFD00DB43Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Resistance to Wear of Four Matrices with Ball Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Fatigue Study</title><author><name sortKey="Branchi, Roberto" sort="Branchi, Roberto" uniqKey="Branchi R" first="Roberto" last="Branchi">Roberto Branchi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Florence, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vangi, Dario" sort="Vangi, Dario" uniqKey="Vangi D" first="Dario" last="Vangi">Dario Vangi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florence, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Virga, Antonio" sort="Virga, Antonio" uniqKey="Virga A" first="Antonio" last="Virga">Antonio Virga</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florence, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Guertin, Genevieve" sort="Guertin, Genevieve" uniqKey="Guertin G" first="Genevieve" last="Guertin">Genevieve Guertin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Restorative Department, University of Montreal, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fazi, Giovanni" sort="Fazi, Giovanni" uniqKey="Fazi G" first="Giovanni" last="Fazi">Giovanni Fazi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Florence, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8635A57FEE5EFF002FE6AF80052284AAFD00DB43</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00613.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8635A57FEE5EFF002FE6AF80052284AAFD00DB43/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004260</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004260</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Resistance to Wear of Four Matrices with Ball Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Fatigue Study</title><author><name sortKey="Branchi, Roberto" sort="Branchi, Roberto" uniqKey="Branchi R" first="Roberto" last="Branchi">Roberto Branchi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Florence, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vangi, Dario" sort="Vangi, Dario" uniqKey="Vangi D" first="Dario" last="Vangi">Dario Vangi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florence, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Virga, Antonio" sort="Virga, Antonio" uniqKey="Virga A" first="Antonio" last="Virga">Antonio Virga</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florence, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Guertin, Genevieve" sort="Guertin, Genevieve" uniqKey="Guertin G" first="Genevieve" last="Guertin">Genevieve Guertin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Restorative Department, University of Montreal, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fazi, Giovanni" sort="Fazi, Giovanni" uniqKey="Fazi G" first="Giovanni" last="Fazi">Giovanni Fazi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Florence, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">8</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="614">614</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="619">619</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-12">2010-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Alloy</term><term>American college</term><term>Attachment</term><term>Attachment system</term><term>Attachment systems</term><term>Ball attachment</term><term>Ball attachments</term><term>Ball attachments branchi</term><term>Ball patrices</term><term>Ball patrix</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Continuous loss</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental literature</term><term>Different matrices</term><term>Different time cycles</term><term>Dimensional analysis</term><term>Dimensional changes</term><term>Fatigue studies</term><term>Fatigue testing</term><term>Highest retention values</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant angulation</term><term>Implant overdenture attachments</term><term>Implant overdentures</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Load transfer</term><term>Major axis</term><term>Mandibular implant overdentures</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Martina</term><term>Matrix</term><term>Matrix components</term><term>Mechanical engineering</term><term>Metal housing</term><term>Noble alloy</term><term>Noble alloy group</term><term>Noble alloy matrices</term><term>Noble alloy matrix</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Patrix</term><term>Plastic adaptation</term><term>Present study</term><term>Progressive decrease</term><term>Progressive loss</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Retention</term><term>Retention force</term><term>Retention loss</term><term>Retention value</term><term>Retention values</term><term>Same type</term><term>Specimen holders</term><term>Spherical attachments</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Sweden martina</term><term>Testing machine</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium group</term><term>Titanium matrices</term><term>Titanium matrix</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Alloy</term><term>American college</term><term>Attachment</term><term>Attachment system</term><term>Attachment systems</term><term>Ball attachment</term><term>Ball attachments</term><term>Ball attachments branchi</term><term>Ball patrices</term><term>Ball patrix</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Continuous loss</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental literature</term><term>Different matrices</term><term>Different time cycles</term><term>Dimensional analysis</term><term>Dimensional changes</term><term>Fatigue studies</term><term>Fatigue testing</term><term>Highest retention values</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant angulation</term><term>Implant overdenture attachments</term><term>Implant overdentures</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Load transfer</term><term>Major axis</term><term>Mandibular implant overdentures</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Martina</term><term>Matrix</term><term>Matrix components</term><term>Mechanical engineering</term><term>Metal housing</term><term>Noble alloy</term><term>Noble alloy group</term><term>Noble alloy matrices</term><term>Noble alloy matrix</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Patrix</term><term>Plastic adaptation</term><term>Present study</term><term>Progressive decrease</term><term>Progressive loss</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Retention</term><term>Retention force</term><term>Retention loss</term><term>Retention value</term><term>Retention values</term><term>Same type</term><term>Specimen holders</term><term>Spherical attachments</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Sweden martina</term><term>Testing machine</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium group</term><term>Titanium matrices</term><term>Titanium matrix</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Purpose: The study evaluated in vitro the retention force and the wear resistance over simulated function of four matrix components of ball attachments for implant‐retained overdentures.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>matrix</json:string><json:string>patrix</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>ball attachments</json:string><json:string>retention values</json:string><json:string>prosthet</json:string><json:string>ball patrix</json:string><json:string>sweden martina</json:string><json:string>martina</json:string><json:string>prosthodont</json:string><json:string>attachment systems</json:string><json:string>attachment</json:string><json:string>ball patrices</json:string><json:string>american college</json:string><json:string>retention loss</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>ball attachments branchi</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>titanium matrix</json:string><json:string>dimensional analysis</json:string><json:string>noble alloy</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>titanium matrices</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>fatigue studies</json:string><json:string>noble alloy matrices</json:string><json:string>insertion</json:string><json:string>alloy</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>retention</json:string><json:string>testing machine</json:string><json:string>mandibular implant overdentures</json:string><json:string>implant overdentures</json:string><json:string>titanium group</json:string><json:string>progressive loss</json:string><json:string>implant angulation</json:string><json:string>ball attachment</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>retention force</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>noble alloy matrix</json:string><json:string>dimensional changes</json:string><json:string>same type</json:string><json:string>acrylic resin</json:string><json:string>highest retention values</json:string><json:string>different matrices</json:string><json:string>matrix components</json:string><json:string>fatigue testing</json:string><json:string>major axis</json:string><json:string>statistical analysis</json:string><json:string>spherical attachments</json:string><json:string>different time cycles</json:string><json:string>noble alloy group</json:string><json:string>metal housing</json:string><json:string>specimen holders</json:string><json:string>progressive decrease</json:string><json:string>attachment system</json:string><json:string>plastic adaptation</json:string><json:string>mechanical engineering</json:string><json:string>load transfer</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>dental literature</json:string><json:string>retention value</json:string><json:string>continuous loss</json:string><json:string>oral rehabil</json:string><json:string>implant overdenture attachments</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Roberto Branchi MD, DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Florence, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Dario Vangi EngD, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florence, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Antonio Virga EngD, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florence, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Genevieve Guertin DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Restorative Department, University of Montreal, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Giovanni Fazi DDS, MSc</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Florence, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Fatigue study</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>ball attachment</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>overdenture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>retention</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐retained overdenture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Teflon</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>titanium</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>gold</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>O‐ring</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>wear</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOPR613</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-6G7DW15N-P</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Purpose: The study evaluated in vitro the retention force and the wear resistance over simulated function of four matrix components of ball attachments for implant‐retained overdentures.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>26</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>186</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>11</keywordCount><score>5.769</score><pdfWordCount>3457</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>22011</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.274 x 782.286 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Resistance to Wear of Four Matrices with Ball Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Fatigue Study</title><pmid><json:string>20546492</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Prosthodontics</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1059-941X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1532-849X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOPR</json:string></publisherId><volume>19</volume><issue>8</issue><pages><first>614</first><last>619</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>5500</json:string><json:string>2200</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Mechanical Engineering of University of Firenze</json:string><json:string>Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.</json:string><json:string>American College of Prosthodontists</json:string><json:string>American College of Prosthodontists Wear of Ball Attachments</json:string><json:string>Restorative Department, University of Montreal, Canada</json:string><json:string>Ney Dental Inc.</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Giovanni Fazi</json:string><json:string>Antonio Virga</json:string><json:string>Via Ponte</json:string><json:string>Dario Vangi</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Minneapolis</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Sunnyvale</json:string><json:string>Japan</json:string><json:string>Tokyo</json:string><json:string>CA</json:string><json:string>Palm Beach</json:string><json:string>FL</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>MN</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Gulizio et al</json:string><json:string>Botega et al</json:string><json:string>Setz et al</json:string><json:string>Fromentin et al</json:string><json:string>Breeding et al</json:string><json:string>Doukas et al</json:string><json:string>Branchi et al</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-6G7DW15N-P</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00613.x</json:string></doi><id>8635A57FEE5EFF002FE6AF80052284AAFD00DB43</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8635A57FEE5EFF002FE6AF80052284AAFD00DB43/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8635A57FEE5EFF002FE6AF80052284AAFD00DB43/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8635A57FEE5EFF002FE6AF80052284AAFD00DB43/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Resistance to Wear of Four Matrices with Ball Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Fatigue Study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 by The American College of Prosthodontists</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Resistance to Wear of Four Matrices with Ball Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Fatigue Study</title><title level="a" type="short">Wear of Ball Attachments</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Roberto</forename><surname>Branchi</surname><roleName type="degree">MD, DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Florence, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Dario</forename><surname>Vangi</surname><roleName type="degree">EngD, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florence, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Antonio</forename><surname>Virga</surname><roleName type="degree">EngD, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florence, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Genevieve</forename><surname>Guertin</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Restorative Department, University of Montreal, Canada<address><country key="CA"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Giovanni</forename><surname>Fazi</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Florence, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">8635A57FEE5EFF002FE6AF80052284AAFD00DB43</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6G7DW15N-P</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00613.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOPR613</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOPR.JOPR613.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title><idno type="pISSN">1059-941X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jopr.2010.19.issue-8</idno><idno type="product">JOPR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">8</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="614">614</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="619">619</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p>
<hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> The study evaluated in vitro the retention force and the wear resistance over simulated function of four matrix components of ball attachments for implant‐retained overdentures.</p><p>
<hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Four types of matrices for ball attachments were evaluated in a fatigue study simulating 5500 cycles of insertion and removal. The matrices used were (1) a Teflon matrix supported by a metal housing, (2) a titanium matrix, (3) a gold alloy matrix, (4) an O‐ring matrix using the red color ring for medium retention. Dimensional changes of the ball attachments were investigated with a profilometer.</p><p>
<hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> The Teflon matrices showed an increase of 27% in retention at 5500 cycles while the gold alloy matrices showed an increase of 50% in retention in the first 500 cycles and remained relatively stable up to 5500 cycles. On the other hand, titanium matrices and O‐ring matrices exhibited progressive loss of retention ending with 68% and 75% of retention loss, respectively, at 5500 cycles. Dimensional analysis by profilometer revealed significant wear on the ball attachment only for titanium matrixes.</p><p>
<hi rend="bold">Conclusions:</hi> Gold alloy and Teflon matrices showed the highest retention values without retention loss after 3 years of simulated function. Titanium and O‐ring matrices presented a continuous loss of retention with the highest wear on the ball attachments when combined with the titanium matrix.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">Fatigue study</term><term xml:id="k2">ball attachment</term><term xml:id="k3">overdenture</term><term xml:id="k4">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k5">retention</term><term xml:id="k6">implant‐retained overdenture</term><term xml:id="k7">Teflon</term><term xml:id="k8">titanium</term><term xml:id="k9">gold</term><term xml:id="k10">O‐ring</term><term xml:id="k11">wear</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8635A57FEE5EFF002FE6AF80052284AAFD00DB43/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</doi><issn type="print">1059-941X</issn><issn type="electronic">1532-849X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOPR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title type="subtitle">Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12108"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jopr.2010.19.issue-8</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="19">19</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="8">8</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-12">December 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="6" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00613.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOPR613"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 by The American College of Prosthodontists</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-12-03"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-06-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.27 mode:FullText" date="2010-12-03"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-12-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-31"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="614">614</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="619">619</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>
Giovanni Fazi, Università Degli Studi di Firenze—Protesi Dentaria, Via Ponte di Mezzo Firenze 50100, Italy. E‐mail: <email>fazi_90211@yahoo.com</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOPR.JOPR613.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted December 2, 2009</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="5"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="26"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="39"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Resistance to Wear of Four Matrices with Ball Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Fatigue Study</title><title type="shortAuthors">Branchi <i>et al</i></title><title type="short">Wear of Ball Attachments</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Roberto</givenNames><familyName>Branchi</familyName><degrees>MD, DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Dario</givenNames><familyName>Vangi</familyName><degrees>EngD, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Antonio</givenNames><familyName>Virga</familyName><degrees>EngD, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Genevieve</givenNames><familyName>Guertin</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Giovanni</givenNames><familyName>Fazi</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Florence, Italy</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florence, Italy</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="CA"><unparsedAffiliation>Restorative Department, University of Montreal, Canada</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Fatigue study</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">ball attachment</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">overdenture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">retention</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">implant‐retained overdenture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">Teflon</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">titanium</keyword><keyword xml:id="k9">gold</keyword><keyword xml:id="k10">O‐ring</keyword><keyword xml:id="k11">wear</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p> <b>Purpose:</b> The study evaluated in vitro the retention force and the wear resistance over simulated function of four matrix components of ball attachments for implant‐retained overdentures.</p><p> <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Four types of matrices for ball attachments were evaluated in a fatigue study simulating 5500 cycles of insertion and removal. The matrices used were (1) a Teflon matrix supported by a metal housing, (2) a titanium matrix, (3) a gold alloy matrix, (4) an O‐ring matrix using the red color ring for medium retention. Dimensional changes of the ball attachments were investigated with a profilometer.</p><p> <b>Results:</b> The Teflon matrices showed an increase of 27% in retention at 5500 cycles while the gold alloy matrices showed an increase of 50% in retention in the first 500 cycles and remained relatively stable up to 5500 cycles. On the other hand, titanium matrices and O‐ring matrices exhibited progressive loss of retention ending with 68% and 75% of retention loss, respectively, at 5500 cycles. Dimensional analysis by profilometer revealed significant wear on the ball attachment only for titanium matrixes.</p><p> <b>Conclusions:</b> Gold alloy and Teflon matrices showed the highest retention values without retention loss after 3 years of simulated function. Titanium and O‐ring matrices presented a continuous loss of retention with the highest wear on the ball attachments when combined with the titanium matrix.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Resistance to Wear of Four Matrices with Ball Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Fatigue Study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Wear of Ball Attachments</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Resistance to Wear of Four Matrices with Ball Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Fatigue Study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Roberto</namePart><namePart type="family">Branchi</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD, DDS</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Florence, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Dario</namePart><namePart type="family">Vangi</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">EngD, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florence, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Antonio</namePart><namePart type="family">Virga</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">EngD, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Florence, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Genevieve</namePart><namePart type="family">Guertin</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Restorative Department, University of Montreal, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Giovanni</namePart><namePart type="family">Fazi</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Florence, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-12</dateIssued><edition>Accepted December 2, 2009</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">5</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">26</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">39</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Purpose: The study evaluated in vitro the retention force and the wear resistance over simulated function of four matrix components of ball attachments for implant‐retained overdentures.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Four types of matrices for ball attachments were evaluated in a fatigue study simulating 5500 cycles of insertion and removal. The matrices used were (1) a Teflon matrix supported by a metal housing, (2) a titanium matrix, (3) a gold alloy matrix, (4) an O‐ring matrix using the red color ring for medium retention. Dimensional changes of the ball attachments were investigated with a profilometer.</abstract><abstract>Results: The Teflon matrices showed an increase of 27% in retention at 5500 cycles while the gold alloy matrices showed an increase of 50% in retention in the first 500 cycles and remained relatively stable up to 5500 cycles. On the other hand, titanium matrices and O‐ring matrices exhibited progressive loss of retention ending with 68% and 75% of retention loss, respectively, at 5500 cycles. Dimensional analysis by profilometer revealed significant wear on the ball attachment only for titanium matrixes.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: Gold alloy and Teflon matrices showed the highest retention values without retention loss after 3 years of simulated function. Titanium and O‐ring matrices presented a continuous loss of retention with the highest wear on the ball attachments when combined with the titanium matrix.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Fatigue study</topic><topic>ball attachment</topic><topic>overdenture</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>retention</topic><topic>implant‐retained overdenture</topic><topic>Teflon</topic><topic>titanium</topic><topic>gold</topic><topic>O‐ring</topic><topic>wear</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Prosthodontics</title><subTitle>Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry</subTitle></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1059-941X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1532-849X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOPR</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>19</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>8</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>614</start><end>619</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">8635A57FEE5EFF002FE6AF80052284AAFD00DB43</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6G7DW15N-P</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00613.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOPR613</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 by The American College of Prosthodontists</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8635A57FEE5EFF002FE6AF80052284AAFD00DB43/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004260 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004260 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8635A57FEE5EFF002FE6AF80052284AAFD00DB43
|texte= Resistance to Wear of Four Matrices with Ball Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Fatigue Study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |