Western hemispheric trade agreements and sustainability: Lesson from butterflies, hummingbirds, and salty anchovies
Identifieur interne : 004097 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004096; suivant : 004098Western hemispheric trade agreements and sustainability: Lesson from butterflies, hummingbirds, and salty anchovies
Auteurs : Van V. Miller ; Charles T. Crespy ; Kurt H. Loess ; José A. RenauSource :
- Sustainable Development [ 0968-0802 ] ; 2010-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Cafta, Cafta countries, Central america, Conceptual foundation, Copyright, Costa, Costa rica, Development bank, Eclectic paradigm, Ecol, Ecol niche, Ecol niches, Ecology, Ecosystem, Environment sust, Environmental standards, Foreign investments, Foreign investors, Foreign operators, Foreign trade, Free trade, Global commerce, Higher labor costs, Industrial ecology, Industrial ecosystem, Industrial symbiosis, Industrial symbiosis institute, International commerce, International context, International trade, John wiley sons, Kalundborg, Labor costs, Labor standards, Mexican economy, Nafta, National economy, National level, National variations, Next section, Niche, Regional trade agreements, Relevant chapters, Research proposition, Rica, Side accords, Social dimension, Subsequent work, Substantial rise, Sust, Sustainability, Sustainability matters, Sustainability standards, Sustainable, Sustainable development, Symbiosis, Tncs, Trade agreement, Trade agreements, Trade balance, Transnational corporation, Usptpa, Water pipeline.
- Teeft :
- Cafta, Cafta countries, Central america, Conceptual foundation, Copyright, Costa, Costa rica, Development bank, Eclectic paradigm, Ecol, Ecol niche, Ecol niches, Ecology, Ecosystem, Environment sust, Environmental standards, Foreign investments, Foreign investors, Foreign operators, Foreign trade, Free trade, Global commerce, Higher labor costs, Industrial ecology, Industrial ecosystem, Industrial symbiosis, Industrial symbiosis institute, International commerce, International context, International trade, John wiley sons, Kalundborg, Labor costs, Labor standards, Mexican economy, Nafta, National economy, National level, National variations, Next section, Niche, Regional trade agreements, Relevant chapters, Research proposition, Rica, Side accords, Social dimension, Subsequent work, Substantial rise, Sust, Sustainability, Sustainability matters, Sustainability standards, Sustainable, Sustainable development, Symbiosis, Tncs, Trade agreement, Trade agreements, Trade balance, Transnational corporation, Usptpa, Water pipeline.
Abstract
The relationship between international commerce and sustainable development is the subject of much controversy that is exacerbated by geographic boundaries that are co‐jointly developed, shaped, and sustained by regional trade agreements. The outcomes of three Americas trade agreements – NAFTA, CAFTA, and USPTPA – are analyzed across three dimensions: economic, ecological, and labor. The three dimensions collectively form for each trade region a specific ECOL niche that is concurrently subject to national variation. We propose and find that low‐ECOL niches in the Americas appear to attract more foreign trade with investment. Nevertheless, this tentative finding seems not to hold for those corporations that seek out strong ECOL niche countries like Costa Rica. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/sd.491
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:82DC941930B2D417E7332AAE7C2028D1398F0318Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Western hemispheric trade agreements and sustainability: Lesson from butterflies, hummingbirds, and salty anchovies</title><author><name sortKey="Miller, Van V" sort="Miller, Van V" uniqKey="Miller V" first="Van V." last="Miller">Van V. Miller</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: mille2v@cmich.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: CMU – Smith Hall 204H, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Crespy, Charles T" sort="Crespy, Charles T" uniqKey="Crespy C" first="Charles T." last="Crespy">Charles T. Crespy</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Loess, Kurt H" sort="Loess, Kurt H" uniqKey="Loess K" first="Kurt H." last="Loess">Kurt H. Loess</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Renau, Jose A" sort="Renau, Jose A" uniqKey="Renau J" first="José A." last="Renau">José A. Renau</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:82DC941930B2D417E7332AAE7C2028D1398F0318</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/sd.491</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/82DC941930B2D417E7332AAE7C2028D1398F0318/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004097</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004097</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Western hemispheric trade agreements and sustainability: Lesson from butterflies, hummingbirds, and salty anchovies</title><author><name sortKey="Miller, Van V" sort="Miller, Van V" uniqKey="Miller V" first="Van V." last="Miller">Van V. Miller</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: mille2v@cmich.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: CMU – Smith Hall 204H, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Crespy, Charles T" sort="Crespy, Charles T" uniqKey="Crespy C" first="Charles T." last="Crespy">Charles T. Crespy</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Loess, Kurt H" sort="Loess, Kurt H" uniqKey="Loess K" first="Kurt H." last="Loess">Kurt H. Loess</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Renau, Jose A" sort="Renau, Jose A" uniqKey="Renau J" first="José A." last="Renau">José A. Renau</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Sustainable Development</title><title level="j" type="sub">Regional Sustainable Development: Making Development Work in Politically Contingent Space</title><title level="j" type="alt">SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT</title><idno type="ISSN">0968-0802</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1719</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">18</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="220">220</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="228">228</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-07">2010-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0968-0802</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0968-0802</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cafta</term><term>Cafta countries</term><term>Central america</term><term>Conceptual foundation</term><term>Copyright</term><term>Costa</term><term>Costa rica</term><term>Development bank</term><term>Eclectic paradigm</term><term>Ecol</term><term>Ecol niche</term><term>Ecol niches</term><term>Ecology</term><term>Ecosystem</term><term>Environment sust</term><term>Environmental standards</term><term>Foreign investments</term><term>Foreign investors</term><term>Foreign operators</term><term>Foreign trade</term><term>Free trade</term><term>Global commerce</term><term>Higher labor costs</term><term>Industrial ecology</term><term>Industrial ecosystem</term><term>Industrial symbiosis</term><term>Industrial symbiosis institute</term><term>International commerce</term><term>International context</term><term>International trade</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Kalundborg</term><term>Labor costs</term><term>Labor standards</term><term>Mexican economy</term><term>Nafta</term><term>National economy</term><term>National level</term><term>National variations</term><term>Next section</term><term>Niche</term><term>Regional trade agreements</term><term>Relevant chapters</term><term>Research proposition</term><term>Rica</term><term>Side accords</term><term>Social dimension</term><term>Subsequent work</term><term>Substantial rise</term><term>Sust</term><term>Sustainability</term><term>Sustainability matters</term><term>Sustainability standards</term><term>Sustainable</term><term>Sustainable development</term><term>Symbiosis</term><term>Tncs</term><term>Trade agreement</term><term>Trade agreements</term><term>Trade balance</term><term>Transnational corporation</term><term>Usptpa</term><term>Water pipeline</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Cafta</term><term>Cafta countries</term><term>Central america</term><term>Conceptual foundation</term><term>Copyright</term><term>Costa</term><term>Costa rica</term><term>Development bank</term><term>Eclectic paradigm</term><term>Ecol</term><term>Ecol niche</term><term>Ecol niches</term><term>Ecology</term><term>Ecosystem</term><term>Environment sust</term><term>Environmental standards</term><term>Foreign investments</term><term>Foreign investors</term><term>Foreign operators</term><term>Foreign trade</term><term>Free trade</term><term>Global commerce</term><term>Higher labor costs</term><term>Industrial ecology</term><term>Industrial ecosystem</term><term>Industrial symbiosis</term><term>Industrial symbiosis institute</term><term>International commerce</term><term>International context</term><term>International trade</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Kalundborg</term><term>Labor costs</term><term>Labor standards</term><term>Mexican economy</term><term>Nafta</term><term>National economy</term><term>National level</term><term>National variations</term><term>Next section</term><term>Niche</term><term>Regional trade agreements</term><term>Relevant chapters</term><term>Research proposition</term><term>Rica</term><term>Side accords</term><term>Social dimension</term><term>Subsequent work</term><term>Substantial rise</term><term>Sust</term><term>Sustainability</term><term>Sustainability matters</term><term>Sustainability standards</term><term>Sustainable</term><term>Sustainable development</term><term>Symbiosis</term><term>Tncs</term><term>Trade agreement</term><term>Trade agreements</term><term>Trade balance</term><term>Transnational corporation</term><term>Usptpa</term><term>Water pipeline</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The relationship between international commerce and sustainable development is the subject of much controversy that is exacerbated by geographic boundaries that are co‐jointly developed, shaped, and sustained by regional trade agreements. The outcomes of three Americas trade agreements – NAFTA, CAFTA, and USPTPA – are analyzed across three dimensions: economic, ecological, and labor. The three dimensions collectively form for each trade region a specific ECOL niche that is concurrently subject to national variation. We propose and find that low‐ECOL niches in the Americas appear to attract more foreign trade with investment. Nevertheless, this tentative finding seems not to hold for those corporations that seek out strong ECOL niche countries like Costa Rica. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>ecol</json:string><json:string>sustainability</json:string><json:string>nafta</json:string><json:string>sustainable</json:string><json:string>cafta</json:string><json:string>foreign trade</json:string><json:string>usptpa</json:string><json:string>symbiosis</json:string><json:string>rica</json:string><json:string>costa</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string><json:string>tncs</json:string><json:string>ecol niches</json:string><json:string>costa rica</json:string><json:string>sustainable development</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>copyright</json:string><json:string>sust</json:string><json:string>industrial ecology</json:string><json:string>environment sust</json:string><json:string>niche</json:string><json:string>kalundborg</json:string><json:string>ecol niche</json:string><json:string>ecosystem</json:string><json:string>trade agreements</json:string><json:string>sustainability standards</json:string><json:string>industrial symbiosis</json:string><json:string>global commerce</json:string><json:string>central america</json:string><json:string>international trade</json:string><json:string>industrial symbiosis institute</json:string><json:string>research proposition</json:string><json:string>foreign investors</json:string><json:string>development bank</json:string><json:string>sustainability matters</json:string><json:string>industrial ecosystem</json:string><json:string>labor costs</json:string><json:string>national variations</json:string><json:string>international context</json:string><json:string>higher labor costs</json:string><json:string>subsequent work</json:string><json:string>transnational corporation</json:string><json:string>water pipeline</json:string><json:string>foreign investments</json:string><json:string>eclectic paradigm</json:string><json:string>free trade</json:string><json:string>national level</json:string><json:string>regional trade agreements</json:string><json:string>national economy</json:string><json:string>side accords</json:string><json:string>international commerce</json:string><json:string>environmental standards</json:string><json:string>labor standards</json:string><json:string>mexican economy</json:string><json:string>next section</json:string><json:string>relevant chapters</json:string><json:string>conceptual foundation</json:string><json:string>social dimension</json:string><json:string>foreign operators</json:string><json:string>substantial rise</json:string><json:string>trade balance</json:string><json:string>cafta countries</json:string><json:string>trade agreement</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Van V. Miller</name><affiliations><json:string>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA</json:string><json:string>E-mail: mille2v@cmich.edu</json:string><json:string>Correspondence address: CMU – Smith Hall 204H, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Charles T. Crespy</name><affiliations><json:string>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Kurt H. Loess</name><affiliations><json:string>East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>José A. Renau</name><affiliations><json:string>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Costa Rica</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>free trade</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Mexico</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>industrial symbiosis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sustainable development</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>SD491</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-4DJVRXCH-J</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The relationship between international commerce and sustainable development is the subject of much controversy that is exacerbated by geographic boundaries that are co‐jointly developed, shaped, and sustained by regional trade agreements. The outcomes of three Americas trade agreements – NAFTA, CAFTA, and USPTPA – are analyzed across three dimensions: economic, ecological, and labor. The three dimensions collectively form for each trade region a specific ECOL niche that is concurrently subject to national variation. We propose and find that low‐ECOL niches in the Americas appear to attract more foreign trade with investment. Nevertheless, this tentative finding seems not to hold for those corporations that seek out strong ECOL niche countries like Costa Rica. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.075</score><pdfWordCount>4599</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>28609</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>566.929 x 737.008 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>123</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>830</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Western hemispheric trade agreements and sustainability: Lesson from butterflies, hummingbirds, and salty anchovies</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Sustainable Development</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0968-0802</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1099-1719</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>SD</json:string></publisherId><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>220</first><last>228</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><author><json:item><name>Donald I. Lyons</name></json:item><json:item><name>Pauline Deutz</name></json:item></author><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2005</json:string><json:string>2006</json:string><json:string>2007</json:string><json:string>1961</json:string><json:string>1990</json:string><json:string>1995</json:string><json:string>2008</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string><json:string>2000s</json:string></date><geogName><json:string>Mediterranean Sea</json:string><json:string>Caspian Sea</json:string></geogName><orgName><json:string>International Labor Organization</json:string><json:string>Guatemala Sources</json:string><json:string>US Tax Code</json:string><json:string>Inter-American Development Bank</json:string><json:string>Low Mexico Distance</json:string><json:string>Industrial Symbiosis Institute</json:string><json:string>East Tennessee State University, Johnson City</json:string><json:string>North American Free Trade Agreement</json:string><json:string>High Peru Costa Rica</json:string><json:string>Inter‐American Development Bank</json:string><json:string>Mexico Source</json:string><json:string>USPTPA</json:string><json:string>ILO</json:string><json:string>Sons, Ltd</json:string><json:string>Dominican Republic–Central America–United States Free Trade Agreement</json:string><json:string>Municipality of Kalundborg</json:string><json:string>Conceptual Foundation</json:string><json:string>Environmental Performance Index</json:string><json:string>Research Proposition</json:string><json:string>United States–Peru Trade Promotion Agreement</json:string><json:string>Peru Source</json:string><json:string>Department of Education</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Charles T. Crespy</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Smith Hall</json:string><json:string>Van V. Miller</json:string><json:string>Kurt H. Loess</json:string><json:string>José A. Renau</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Peru</json:string><json:string>Mexico</json:string><json:string>Costa Rica</json:string><json:string>Baku</json:string><json:string>Puerto Rico</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>America</json:string><json:string>Guatemala</json:string><json:string>MI</json:string><json:string>Tbilisi</json:string></placeName><ref_url><json:string>http://www.comexperu.org.pe</json:string><json:string>http://www.proinversion.gob.pe</json:string></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Frosch and Gallopoulos, 1989</json:string><json:string>Lyons et al. (2009: 286)</json:string><json:string>Deutz and Gibbs (2004: 360)</json:string><json:string>Korhonen, 2007</json:string><json:string>Industrial Symbiosis Institute, 2008</json:string><json:string>Steger, 2005</json:string><json:string>Desrochers (2008)</json:string><json:string>Miller and Crespy, 2009</json:string><json:string>V. V. Miller et al.</json:string><json:string>consistent with the overarching industrial ecology metaphor; Isenmann, 2003</json:string><json:string>Dunning and Lundan, 2008</json:string><json:string>Miller and Crespy (2009)</json:string><json:string>Geng et al., 2007</json:string><json:string>Wisner and Epstein, 2005</json:string><json:string>Casagrande and Welford (1997)</json:string><json:string>Waldkirch and Gopinath, 2008</json:string><json:string>Quintero (2007)</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-4DJVRXCH-J</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string><json:string>2 - planning & development</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - natural sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - earth & environmental sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - environmental sciences</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Development</json:string><json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Energy</json:string><json:string>3 - Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/sd.491</json:string></doi><id>82DC941930B2D417E7332AAE7C2028D1398F0318</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/82DC941930B2D417E7332AAE7C2028D1398F0318/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/82DC941930B2D417E7332AAE7C2028D1398F0318/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/82DC941930B2D417E7332AAE7C2028D1398F0318/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Western hemispheric trade agreements and sustainability: Lesson from butterflies, hummingbirds, and salty anchovies</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Western hemispheric trade agreements and sustainability: Lesson from butterflies, hummingbirds, and salty anchovies</title><title level="a" type="short" xml:lang="en">Western Hemispheric Trade Agreements and Sustainability</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Van V.</forename><surname>Miller</surname></persName><email>mille2v@cmich.edu</email><affiliation>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>CMU – Smith Hall 204H, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Charles T.</forename><surname>Crespy</surname></persName><affiliation>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Kurt H.</forename><surname>Loess</surname></persName><affiliation>East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">José A.</forename><surname>Renau</surname></persName><affiliation>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">82DC941930B2D417E7332AAE7C2028D1398F0318</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-4DJVRXCH-J</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/sd.491</idno><idno type="unit">SD491</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:SD.SD491.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><editor xml:id="editor-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Donald I.</forename><surname>Lyons</surname></persName></editor><editor xml:id="editor-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Pauline</forename><surname>Deutz</surname></persName></editor><title level="j" type="main">Sustainable Development</title><title level="j" type="sub">Regional Sustainable Development: Making Development Work in Politically Contingent Space</title><title level="j" type="alt">SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT</title><idno type="pISSN">0968-0802</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1719</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1002/sd.v18:4</idno><idno type="product">SD</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">18</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="220">220</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="228">228</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p>The relationship between international commerce and sustainable development is the subject of much controversy that is exacerbated by geographic boundaries that are co‐jointly developed, shaped, and sustained by regional trade agreements. The outcomes of three Americas trade agreements – NAFTA, CAFTA, and USPTPA – are analyzed across three dimensions: economic, ecological, and labor. The three dimensions collectively form for each trade region a specific ECOL niche that is concurrently subject to national variation. We propose and find that low‐ECOL niches in the Americas appear to attract more foreign trade with investment. Nevertheless, this tentative finding seems not to hold for those corporations that seek out strong ECOL niche countries like Costa Rica. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="kwd1">Costa Rica</term><term xml:id="kwd2">free trade</term><term xml:id="kwd3">Mexico</term><term xml:id="kwd4">industrial symbiosis</term><term xml:id="kwd5">sustainable development</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Research Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Research Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/82DC941930B2D417E7332AAE7C2028D1398F0318/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisherName><publisherLoc>Chichester, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719</doi><issn type="print">0968-0802</issn><issn type="electronic">1099-1719</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="SD"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT">Sustainable Development</title><title type="short">Sust. Dev.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="40"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/sd.v18:4</doi><titleGroup><title type="specialIssueTitle">Regional Sustainable Development: Making Development Work in Politically Contingent Space</title></titleGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="18">18</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">4</numbering></numberingGroup><creators><creator xml:id="sped1" creatorRole="sponsoringEditor"><personName><givenNames>Donald I.</givenNames><familyName>Lyons</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="sped2" creatorRole="sponsoringEditor"><personName><givenNames>Pauline</givenNames><familyName>Deutz</familyName></personName></creator></creators><coverDate startDate="2010-07">July/August 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="60" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/sd.491</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="SD491"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="joint">Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptReceived" date="2009-06-02"></event><event type="manuscriptRevised" date="2010-03-06"></event><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-07-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-07-22"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.27 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-11-22"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">220</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">228</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>CMU – Smith Hall 204H, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:SD.SD491.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="3"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="34"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">Western hemispheric trade agreements and sustainability: Lesson from butterflies, hummingbirds, and salty anchovies</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">Western Hemispheric Trade Agreements and Sustainability</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Van V.</givenNames><familyName>Miller</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email>mille2v@cmich.edu</email></contactDetails></creator><creator xml:id="au2" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1"><personName><givenNames>Charles T.</givenNames><familyName>Crespy</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au3" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af2"><personName><givenNames>Kurt H.</givenNames><familyName>Loess</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au4" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1"><personName><givenNames>José A.</givenNames><familyName>Renau</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="af2" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en" type="author"><keyword xml:id="kwd1">Costa Rica</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd2">free trade</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd3">Mexico</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd4">industrial symbiosis</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd5">sustainable development</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>The relationship between international commerce and sustainable development is the subject of much controversy that is exacerbated by geographic boundaries that are co‐jointly developed, shaped, and sustained by regional trade agreements. The outcomes of three Americas trade agreements – NAFTA, CAFTA, and USPTPA – are analyzed across three dimensions: economic, ecological, and labor. The three dimensions collectively form for each trade region a specific ECOL niche that is concurrently subject to national variation. We propose and find that low‐ECOL niches in the Americas appear to attract more foreign trade with investment. Nevertheless, this tentative finding seems not to hold for those corporations that seek out strong ECOL niche countries like Costa Rica. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Western hemispheric trade agreements and sustainability: Lesson from butterflies, hummingbirds, and salty anchovies</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Western Hemispheric Trade Agreements and Sustainability</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Western hemispheric trade agreements and sustainability: Lesson from butterflies, hummingbirds, and salty anchovies</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Van V.</namePart><namePart type="family">Miller</namePart><affiliation>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: mille2v@cmich.edu</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence address: CMU – Smith Hall 204H, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Charles T.</namePart><namePart type="family">Crespy</namePart><affiliation>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kurt H.</namePart><namePart type="family">Loess</namePart><affiliation>East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">José A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Renau</namePart><affiliation>Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Chichester, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-07</dateIssued><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2009-06-02</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2010-04-07</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">3</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="references">34</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The relationship between international commerce and sustainable development is the subject of much controversy that is exacerbated by geographic boundaries that are co‐jointly developed, shaped, and sustained by regional trade agreements. The outcomes of three Americas trade agreements – NAFTA, CAFTA, and USPTPA – are analyzed across three dimensions: economic, ecological, and labor. The three dimensions collectively form for each trade region a specific ECOL niche that is concurrently subject to national variation. We propose and find that low‐ECOL niches in the Americas appear to attract more foreign trade with investment. Nevertheless, this tentative finding seems not to hold for those corporations that seek out strong ECOL niche countries like Costa Rica. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Costa Rica</topic><topic>free trade</topic><topic>Mexico</topic><topic>industrial symbiosis</topic><topic>sustainable development</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Sustainable Development</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Sust. Dev.</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Donald I.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lyons</namePart></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Pauline</namePart><namePart type="family">Deutz</namePart></name><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0968-0802</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1099-1719</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">SD</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="title"><title>Regional Sustainable Development: Making Development Work in Politically Contingent Space</title></detail><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>18</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>220</start><end>228</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">82DC941930B2D417E7332AAE7C2028D1398F0318</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-4DJVRXCH-J</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/sd.491</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">SD491</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/82DC941930B2D417E7332AAE7C2028D1398F0318/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004097 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004097 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:82DC941930B2D417E7332AAE7C2028D1398F0318
|texte= Western hemispheric trade agreements and sustainability: Lesson from butterflies, hummingbirds, and salty anchovies
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |