Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study
Identifieur interne : 004005 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004004; suivant : 004006Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study
Auteurs : Miriam Thöne-Mühling ; Katrin Swierkot ; Claudia Nonnenmacher ; Reinier Mutters ; Lavin Flores-De-Jacoby ; Reiner MengelSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2010-05.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Animal study, Bacterial load, Baseline, Bone loss, Chronic periodontitis, Clin, Clinical outcomes, Clinical parameters, Clinical periodontology, Colonization, Control group, Debridement, Dental implants, Dental research, Disinfection, Edentulous patients, Gingival index, Group differences, Impl, Implant, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Mechanical debridement, Mengel, Microbiological, Microbiological analysis, Microbiological observations, Microbiological parameters, Mucositis, Nonnenmacher, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Other studies, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontitis, Periodontology, Philipps university, Pilot study, Planing, Plaque, Porras, Present study, Quirynen, Renvert, Risk factors, Root planing, Statistical analysis, Steenberghe, Subgingival, Systematic review, Test group, Treatment modalities, Ultrasonic debridement.
- Teeft :
- Animal study, Bacterial load, Baseline, Bone loss, Chronic periodontitis, Clin, Clinical outcomes, Clinical parameters, Clinical periodontology, Colonization, Control group, Debridement, Dental implants, Dental research, Disinfection, Edentulous patients, Gingival index, Group differences, Impl, Implant, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Mechanical debridement, Mengel, Microbiological, Microbiological analysis, Microbiological observations, Microbiological parameters, Mucositis, Nonnenmacher, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Other studies, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontitis, Periodontology, Philipps university, Pilot study, Planing, Plaque, Porras, Present study, Quirynen, Renvert, Risk factors, Root planing, Statistical analysis, Steenberghe, Subgingival, Systematic review, Test group, Treatment modalities, Ultrasonic debridement.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that an additional full‐mouth disinfection results in a greater clinical and microbiological improvement compared with sole mechanical debridement within one session in patients with peri‐implant mucositis and treated chronic periodontitis.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01861.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:80C9E5ABE9E77DB7F2FA3232FA02854FBE7773ACLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study</title><author><name sortKey="Thone Hling, Miriam" sort="Thone Hling, Miriam" uniqKey="Thone Hling M" first="Miriam" last="Thöne-Mühling">Miriam Thöne-Mühling</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Swierkot, Katrin" sort="Swierkot, Katrin" uniqKey="Swierkot K" first="Katrin" last="Swierkot">Katrin Swierkot</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nonnenmacher, Claudia" sort="Nonnenmacher, Claudia" uniqKey="Nonnenmacher C" first="Claudia" last="Nonnenmacher">Claudia Nonnenmacher</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mutters, Reinier" sort="Mutters, Reinier" uniqKey="Mutters R" first="Reinier" last="Mutters">Reinier Mutters</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Flores E Acoby, Lavin" sort="Flores E Acoby, Lavin" uniqKey="Flores E Acoby L" first="Lavin" last="Flores-De-Jacoby">Lavin Flores-De-Jacoby</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mengel, Reiner" sort="Mengel, Reiner" uniqKey="Mengel R" first="Reiner" last="Mengel">Reiner Mengel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:80C9E5ABE9E77DB7F2FA3232FA02854FBE7773AC</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01861.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/80C9E5ABE9E77DB7F2FA3232FA02854FBE7773AC/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004005</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004005</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study</title><author><name sortKey="Thone Hling, Miriam" sort="Thone Hling, Miriam" uniqKey="Thone Hling M" first="Miriam" last="Thöne-Mühling">Miriam Thöne-Mühling</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Swierkot, Katrin" sort="Swierkot, Katrin" uniqKey="Swierkot K" first="Katrin" last="Swierkot">Katrin Swierkot</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nonnenmacher, Claudia" sort="Nonnenmacher, Claudia" uniqKey="Nonnenmacher C" first="Claudia" last="Nonnenmacher">Claudia Nonnenmacher</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mutters, Reinier" sort="Mutters, Reinier" uniqKey="Mutters R" first="Reinier" last="Mutters">Reinier Mutters</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Flores E Acoby, Lavin" sort="Flores E Acoby, Lavin" uniqKey="Flores E Acoby L" first="Lavin" last="Flores-De-Jacoby">Lavin Flores-De-Jacoby</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mengel, Reiner" sort="Mengel, Reiner" uniqKey="Mengel R" first="Reiner" last="Mengel">Reiner Mengel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="504">504</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="512">512</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-05">2010-05</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animal study</term><term>Bacterial load</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Chronic periodontitis</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical outcomes</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Colonization</term><term>Control group</term><term>Debridement</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Disinfection</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Gingival index</term><term>Group differences</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Mechanical debridement</term><term>Mengel</term><term>Microbiological</term><term>Microbiological analysis</term><term>Microbiological observations</term><term>Microbiological parameters</term><term>Mucositis</term><term>Nonnenmacher</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Philipps university</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Planing</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Porras</term><term>Present study</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Renvert</term><term>Risk factors</term><term>Root planing</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Subgingival</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Test group</term><term>Treatment modalities</term><term>Ultrasonic debridement</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Animal study</term><term>Bacterial load</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Chronic periodontitis</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical outcomes</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Colonization</term><term>Control group</term><term>Debridement</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Disinfection</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Gingival index</term><term>Group differences</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Mechanical debridement</term><term>Mengel</term><term>Microbiological</term><term>Microbiological analysis</term><term>Microbiological observations</term><term>Microbiological parameters</term><term>Mucositis</term><term>Nonnenmacher</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Philipps university</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Planing</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Porras</term><term>Present study</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Renvert</term><term>Risk factors</term><term>Root planing</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Subgingival</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Test group</term><term>Treatment modalities</term><term>Ultrasonic debridement</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objectives: The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that an additional full‐mouth disinfection results in a greater clinical and microbiological improvement compared with sole mechanical debridement within one session in patients with peri‐implant mucositis and treated chronic periodontitis.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>mucositis</json:string><json:string>microbiological</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>quirynen</json:string><json:string>periodontitis</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>disinfection</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>debridement</json:string><json:string>planing</json:string><json:string>mengel</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>root planing</json:string><json:string>bacterial load</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>chronic periodontitis</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>subgingival</json:string><json:string>renvert</json:string><json:string>steenberghe</json:string><json:string>nonnenmacher</json:string><json:string>colonization</json:string><json:string>porras</json:string><json:string>mechanical debridement</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>test group</json:string><json:string>treatment modalities</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>clinical parameters</json:string><json:string>pilot study</json:string><json:string>gingival index</json:string><json:string>microbiological observations</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>group differences</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>dental research</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>microbiological parameters</json:string><json:string>clinical outcomes</json:string><json:string>animal study</json:string><json:string>other studies</json:string><json:string>ultrasonic debridement</json:string><json:string>statistical analysis</json:string><json:string>microbiological analysis</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>philipps university</json:string><json:string>risk factors</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Miriam Thöne‐Mühling</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Katrin Swierkot</name><affiliations><json:string>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Claudia Nonnenmacher</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Reinier Mutters</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Lavin Flores‐de‐Jacoby</name><affiliations><json:string>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Reiner Mengel</name><affiliations><json:string>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bacterial infection</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>chlorhexidine</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>disinfection</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>full mouth</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mechanical debridement</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implantitis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implant mucositis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>real‐time PCR</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1861</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-950PRFWN-H</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objectives: The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that an additional full‐mouth disinfection results in a greater clinical and microbiological improvement compared with sole mechanical debridement within one session in patients with peri‐implant mucositis and treated chronic periodontitis.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>42</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>308</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>9</keywordCount><score>7.504</score><pdfWordCount>5885</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>40649</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study</title><pmid><json:string>20128831</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>504</first><last>512</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName><json:string>EMS</json:string></geogName><orgName><json:string>Medicine Department of Periodontology Philipps University Georg-Voigt-Street</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Philipps University Marburg, Germany</json:string><json:string>Philipps University</json:string><json:string>The International Journal</json:string><json:string>Applied Biosystems International</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany Claudia Nonnenmacher, Reinier Mutters, Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene</json:string><json:string>Germany Key</json:string><json:string>Marburg Germany Tel</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Dental School</json:string><json:string>Reiner Mengel</json:string><json:string>R. Comparison</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Foster City</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Munich</json:string><json:string>Eppendorf</json:string><json:string>Helsinki</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string><json:string>CA</json:string><json:string>Palm Beach</json:string><json:string>Nyon</json:string><json:string>Zurich</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Fenwick et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Kinane & Radvar 1997</json:string><json:string>Koka et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. 1998a, 1998b</json:string><json:string>Leonhardt et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Vandekerckhove et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>version VI, 2002</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Syed & Loesche 1972</json:string><json:string>Kotsovilis et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Heydenrijk et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Mengel et al. 2007a</json:string><json:string>Hultin et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2006b</json:string><json:string>Nonnenmacher et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Mongardini et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Swierkot et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Rosenberg et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Tanner et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Porras et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Mengel & Floresde-Jacoby 2005</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2006a</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Mengel et al. 1996, 2001, 2007b</json:string><json:string>Lang et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Armitage 1999</json:string><json:string>Kremer et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Bollen et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Wennstro et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Thone-Muhling et al</json:string><json:string>van Winkelhoff et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Karoussis et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Fransson et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Lee et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Furst et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Hamp et al. 1975</json:string><json:string>PlI, Silness & Loe 1964</json:string><json:string>Schwarz et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Porras et al. (2002)</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. (1995)</json:string><json:string>Koshy et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Nakou et al. 1987</json:string><json:string>Chuang et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Renvert et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Mombelli 1997</json:string><json:string>Ferreira et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Trejo et al. (2006)</json:string><json:string>Trejo et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Bollen et al. 1996</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-950PRFWN-H</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01861.x</json:string></doi><id>80C9E5ABE9E77DB7F2FA3232FA02854FBE7773AC</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/80C9E5ABE9E77DB7F2FA3232FA02854FBE7773AC/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/80C9E5ABE9E77DB7F2FA3232FA02854FBE7773AC/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/80C9E5ABE9E77DB7F2FA3232FA02854FBE7773AC/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-05"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study</title><title level="a" type="short">Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Miriam</forename><surname>Thöne‐Mühling</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation><note type="foot">
*Contributed equally.</note></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Katrin</forename><surname>Swierkot</surname></persName><affiliation>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation><note type="foot">
*Contributed equally.</note></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Claudia</forename><surname>Nonnenmacher</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Reinier</forename><surname>Mutters</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Lavin</forename><surname>Flores‐de‐Jacoby</surname></persName><affiliation>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Reiner</forename><surname>Mengel</surname></persName><affiliation>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">80C9E5ABE9E77DB7F2FA3232FA02854FBE7773AC</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-950PRFWN-H</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01861.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1861</idno><idno type="supplier">1861</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1861.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="504">504</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="512">512</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-05"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objectives: </hi> The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that an additional full‐mouth disinfection results in a greater clinical and microbiological improvement compared with sole mechanical debridement within one session in patients with peri‐implant mucositis and treated chronic periodontitis.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi> The study included 13 partially edentulous patients (mean age 51.5 years) with treated chronic periodontitis and 36 dental implants with mucositis (bleeding on probing and/or a gingival index ≥1 at least at one site at baseline, absence of peri‐implant bone loss during the last 2 years before baseline). After randomized assignment to a test and a control group, patients received a one‐stage full‐mouth scaling with or without chlorhexidine. Clinical and microbiological examination was performed at baseline, after 1, 2, 4 and 8 months. Additional microbial samples were taken 24 h after treatment. Microbiological analysis was performed by real‐time polymerase chain reaction.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> Both treatment modalities resulted in significant reductions of probing depth at implant sites after 8 months, with no significant group differences. The bacteria at implants and teeth could be reduced in every group 24 h after treatment; however, this reduction was not significant after 8 months.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> Both treatment modalities led to an improvement of the clinical parameters and a temporary reduction of the microflora at implants with mucositis, but without significant inter‐group differences after 8 months.</p><p>
<hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
Thöne‐Mühling M, Swierkot K, Nonnenmacher C, Mutters R, Flores‐de‐Jacoby L, Mengel R. Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">21</hi>, 2010; 504–512.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01861.x</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bacterial infection</term><term xml:id="k2">chlorhexidine</term><term xml:id="k3">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k4">disinfection</term><term xml:id="k5">full mouth</term><term xml:id="k6">mechanical debridement</term><term xml:id="k7">peri‐implantitis</term><term xml:id="k8">peri‐implant mucositis</term><term xml:id="k9">real‐time PCR</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/80C9E5ABE9E77DB7F2FA3232FA02854FBE7773AC/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="05005"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="21">21</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-05">May 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="7" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01861.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1861"></id><id type="supplier" value="1861"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-02-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-04-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="504">504</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="512">512</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence to:</b>
<i>Reiner Mengel</i>
Dental School of Medicine
Department of Periodontology
Philipps University
Georg‐Voigt‐Street 3
D‐35033 Marburg
Germany
Tel.: +49 6421 5863279
Fax: +49 64 215 863270
e‐mail: <email normalForm="mengel@mailer.uni-marburg.de">mengel@mailer.uni‐marburg.de</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1861.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 15 September 2009</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="62"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="8029"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="59"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study</title><title type="shortAuthors">Thöne‐Mühling et al.</title><title type="short">Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" noteRef="#fn1"><personName><givenNames>Miriam</givenNames><familyName>Thöne‐Mühling</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2" noteRef="#fn1"><personName><givenNames>Katrin</givenNames><familyName>Swierkot</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Claudia</givenNames><familyName>Nonnenmacher</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Reinier</givenNames><familyName>Mutters</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Lavin</givenNames><familyName>Flores‐de‐Jacoby</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Reiner</givenNames><familyName>Mengel</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bacterial infection</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">chlorhexidine</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">disinfection</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">full mouth</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">mechanical debridement</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">peri‐implantitis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">peri‐implant mucositis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k9">real‐time PCR</keyword></keywordGroup><supportingInformation><p><b>Table S1.</b> Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials.</p><p>Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.</p><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:09057161:media:clr1861:CLR_1861_sm_table-s1"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting info item</caption></supportingInfoItem></supportingInformation><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objectives: </b> The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that an additional full‐mouth disinfection results in a greater clinical and microbiological improvement compared with sole mechanical debridement within one session in patients with peri‐implant mucositis and treated chronic periodontitis.</p><p><b>Material and methods: </b> The study included 13 partially edentulous patients (mean age 51.5 years) with treated chronic periodontitis and 36 dental implants with mucositis (bleeding on probing and/or a gingival index ≥1 at least at one site at baseline, absence of peri‐implant bone loss during the last 2 years before baseline). After randomized assignment to a test and a control group, patients received a one‐stage full‐mouth scaling with or without chlorhexidine. Clinical and microbiological examination was performed at baseline, after 1, 2, 4 and 8 months. Additional microbial samples were taken 24 h after treatment. Microbiological analysis was performed by real‐time polymerase chain reaction.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Both treatment modalities resulted in significant reductions of probing depth at implant sites after 8 months, with no significant group differences. The bacteria at implants and teeth could be reduced in every group 24 h after treatment; however, this reduction was not significant after 8 months.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> Both treatment modalities led to an improvement of the clinical parameters and a temporary reduction of the microflora at implants with mucositis, but without significant inter‐group differences after 8 months.</p><p> <b>To cite this article:</b>
Thöne‐Mühling M, Swierkot K, Nonnenmacher C, Mutters R, Flores‐de‐Jacoby L, Mengel R. Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>21</b>, 2010; 504–512.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01861.x</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1" numbered="no"><p><sup>*</sup>Contributed equally.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Miriam</namePart><namePart type="family">Thöne‐Mühling</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</affiliation><description>*Contributed equally.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Katrin</namePart><namePart type="family">Swierkot</namePart><affiliation>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</affiliation><description>*Contributed equally.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Claudia</namePart><namePart type="family">Nonnenmacher</namePart><affiliation>Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Reinier</namePart><namePart type="family">Mutters</namePart><affiliation>Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lavin</namePart><namePart type="family">Flores‐de‐Jacoby</namePart><affiliation>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Reiner</namePart><namePart type="family">Mengel</namePart><affiliation>Dental School of Medicine, Department of Periodontology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-05</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 15 September 2009</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">62</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">59</extent><extent unit="words">8029</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objectives: The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that an additional full‐mouth disinfection results in a greater clinical and microbiological improvement compared with sole mechanical debridement within one session in patients with peri‐implant mucositis and treated chronic periodontitis.</abstract><abstract>Material and methods: The study included 13 partially edentulous patients (mean age 51.5 years) with treated chronic periodontitis and 36 dental implants with mucositis (bleeding on probing and/or a gingival index ≥1 at least at one site at baseline, absence of peri‐implant bone loss during the last 2 years before baseline). After randomized assignment to a test and a control group, patients received a one‐stage full‐mouth scaling with or without chlorhexidine. Clinical and microbiological examination was performed at baseline, after 1, 2, 4 and 8 months. Additional microbial samples were taken 24 h after treatment. Microbiological analysis was performed by real‐time polymerase chain reaction.</abstract><abstract>Results: Both treatment modalities resulted in significant reductions of probing depth at implant sites after 8 months, with no significant group differences. The bacteria at implants and teeth could be reduced in every group 24 h after treatment; however, this reduction was not significant after 8 months.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: Both treatment modalities led to an improvement of the clinical parameters and a temporary reduction of the microflora at implants with mucositis, but without significant inter‐group differences after 8 months.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Thöne‐Mühling M, Swierkot K, Nonnenmacher C, Mutters R, Flores‐de‐Jacoby L, Mengel R. Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 504–512.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01861.x</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bacterial infection</topic><topic>chlorhexidine</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>disinfection</topic><topic>full mouth</topic><topic>mechanical debridement</topic><topic>peri‐implantitis</topic><topic>peri‐implant mucositis</topic><topic>real‐time PCR</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><note type="content"> Table S1. Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Table S1. Supporting information in accordance with the CONSORT Statement 2001 checklist used in reporting randomized trials. Please note: Wiley‐Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.Supporting Info Item: Supporting info item - </note><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>21</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>504</start><end>512</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">80C9E5ABE9E77DB7F2FA3232FA02854FBE7773AC</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-950PRFWN-H</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01861.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1861</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/80C9E5ABE9E77DB7F2FA3232FA02854FBE7773AC/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004005 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004005 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:80C9E5ABE9E77DB7F2FA3232FA02854FBE7773AC
|texte= Comparison of two full‐mouth approaches in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis: a pilot study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |