Evaluation of Dental Students as Instructors in Preclinical Prosthodontics and Occlusion Courses
Identifieur interne : 003F52 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003F51; suivant : 003F53Evaluation of Dental Students as Instructors in Preclinical Prosthodontics and Occlusion Courses
Auteurs : Arthur Nimmo ; Gail S. Mitchell ; Randall D. Penfield ; Alana HallSource :
- Journal of Prosthodontics [ 1059-941X ] ; 2007-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Academic career, Academic year, American college, Assignments communication, Class availability, Class respect, Clinical education, Course facilitation, Course objectives, Daily work, Dent, Dent educ, Dent educ adea, Dental education, Dental school, Dental students, Dentistry, Edentulous patient, Educ, Education association, Evaluation form, Evaluation questions, Faculty instructors, Faculty member, Faculty members, Faculty positions, Florida college, Future interest, Graduation requirements, Greatest difference, Information expression, Instructor, Instructor quality, Instructor type, Interaction effect, Junior students, Main effect, Occlusion, Occlusion courses, Other students, Overall experience, Overall rating, Overall scores, Positive experience, Preclinical, Preclinical courses, Preclinical faculty, Preclinical prosthodontics, Private practice, Prosthodontics, Response scores, Second year, Senior students, Spring term, Student instructor, Student instructors, Student ratings, Student teaching, Students stimulation, Subject encouragement, Summer term.
- Teeft :
- Academic career, Academic year, American college, Assignments communication, Class availability, Class respect, Clinical education, Course facilitation, Course objectives, Daily work, Dent, Dent educ, Dent educ adea, Dental education, Dental school, Dental students, Dentistry, Edentulous patient, Educ, Education association, Evaluation form, Evaluation questions, Faculty instructors, Faculty member, Faculty members, Faculty positions, Florida college, Future interest, Graduation requirements, Greatest difference, Information expression, Instructor, Instructor quality, Instructor type, Interaction effect, Junior students, Main effect, Occlusion, Occlusion courses, Other students, Overall experience, Overall rating, Overall scores, Positive experience, Preclinical, Preclinical courses, Preclinical faculty, Preclinical prosthodontics, Private practice, Prosthodontics, Response scores, Second year, Senior students, Spring term, Student instructor, Student instructors, Student ratings, Student teaching, Students stimulation, Subject encouragement, Summer term.
Abstract
Purpose: While facing a shortage of faculty members, dental schools need to be innovative in their educational methodologies. One approach to augment student learning would be to mentor dental students as participating faculty in current courses. A study was undertaken to evaluate dental students as instructors in preclinical prosthodontics and occlusion courses. Materials and Methods: In spring term 2003, three senior dental students (4DN) and four full‐time faculty were assigned as faculty for each of two preclinical courses: fixed prosthodontics and complete denture prosthodontics. In the summer term 2003, two junior dental students (3DN) and five full‐time faculty were assigned to teach in the occlusion preclinical course. Each course had previously been conducted with a total of seven full‐time faculty. Three types of outcome assessment were accomplished: (1) evaluation by the 2DN students of full‐time faculty and student instructors at the end of the course using a standardized university scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent); (2) a survey of student instructors about their experience; and (3) a course debriefing with selected 2DN students. Results: The overall mean instructor‐quality score assigned to the student instructors, 4.5 (SD, 0.7), was slightly higher than that of faculty instructors, 4.2 (SD, 0.9). Student instructors were rated higher than or equal to full‐time faculty based on the mean response scores for all ten evaluation questions. The greatest difference between faculty and student ratings was in the category of “respect and concern for the students” in all courses. In addition, information gathered from eight student instructors indicated that the experience was a very positive one overall with an increased interest in an academic career noted. Comments from the 2DN students in the debriefing sessions were positive about having student instructors. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that from the perspective of second year dental students, senior and junior dental students were accepted as preclinical instructors in prosthodontics and occlusion preclinical courses. Additionally, senior and junior students who participated in student teaching had a positive experience. The use of dental students as preclinical faculty in prosthodontics and occlusion appears to be a viable approach for mentoring students in careers in academics, providing student instructors with higher learning experiences, and supplementing the efforts of full‐time faculty.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00226.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:7FF49FF77F22DD3C02AC7C08144BF8ABA96F0499Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of Dental Students as Instructors in Preclinical Prosthodontics and Occlusion Courses</title><author><name sortKey="Nimmo, Arthur" sort="Nimmo, Arthur" uniqKey="Nimmo A" first="Arthur" last="Nimmo">Arthur Nimmo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Florida College of Dentistry.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mitchell, Gail S" sort="Mitchell, Gail S" uniqKey="Mitchell G" first="Gail S." last="Mitchell">Gail S. Mitchell</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Director of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Florida College of Dentistry.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Penfield, Randall D" sort="Penfield, Randall D" uniqKey="Penfield R" first="Randall D." last="Penfield">Randall D. Penfield</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hall, Alana" sort="Hall, Alana" uniqKey="Hall A" first="Alana" last="Hall">Alana Hall</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Ocala, FL.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7FF49FF77F22DD3C02AC7C08144BF8ABA96F0499</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00226.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7FF49FF77F22DD3C02AC7C08144BF8ABA96F0499/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003F52</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003F52</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Evaluation of Dental Students as Instructors in Preclinical Prosthodontics and Occlusion Courses</title><author><name sortKey="Nimmo, Arthur" sort="Nimmo, Arthur" uniqKey="Nimmo A" first="Arthur" last="Nimmo">Arthur Nimmo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Florida College of Dentistry.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mitchell, Gail S" sort="Mitchell, Gail S" uniqKey="Mitchell G" first="Gail S." last="Mitchell">Gail S. Mitchell</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Director of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Florida College of Dentistry.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Penfield, Randall D" sort="Penfield, Randall D" uniqKey="Penfield R" first="Randall D." last="Penfield">Randall D. Penfield</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hall, Alana" sort="Hall, Alana" uniqKey="Hall A" first="Alana" last="Hall">Alana Hall</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Ocala, FL.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">16</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="400">400</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="405">405</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-09">2007-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Academic career</term><term>Academic year</term><term>American college</term><term>Assignments communication</term><term>Class availability</term><term>Class respect</term><term>Clinical education</term><term>Course facilitation</term><term>Course objectives</term><term>Daily work</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent educ</term><term>Dent educ adea</term><term>Dental education</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Dental students</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulous patient</term><term>Educ</term><term>Education association</term><term>Evaluation form</term><term>Evaluation questions</term><term>Faculty instructors</term><term>Faculty member</term><term>Faculty members</term><term>Faculty positions</term><term>Florida college</term><term>Future interest</term><term>Graduation requirements</term><term>Greatest difference</term><term>Information expression</term><term>Instructor</term><term>Instructor quality</term><term>Instructor type</term><term>Interaction effect</term><term>Junior students</term><term>Main effect</term><term>Occlusion</term><term>Occlusion courses</term><term>Other students</term><term>Overall experience</term><term>Overall rating</term><term>Overall scores</term><term>Positive experience</term><term>Preclinical</term><term>Preclinical courses</term><term>Preclinical faculty</term><term>Preclinical prosthodontics</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Response scores</term><term>Second year</term><term>Senior students</term><term>Spring term</term><term>Student instructor</term><term>Student instructors</term><term>Student ratings</term><term>Student teaching</term><term>Students stimulation</term><term>Subject encouragement</term><term>Summer term</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Academic career</term><term>Academic year</term><term>American college</term><term>Assignments communication</term><term>Class availability</term><term>Class respect</term><term>Clinical education</term><term>Course facilitation</term><term>Course objectives</term><term>Daily work</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent educ</term><term>Dent educ adea</term><term>Dental education</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Dental students</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulous patient</term><term>Educ</term><term>Education association</term><term>Evaluation form</term><term>Evaluation questions</term><term>Faculty instructors</term><term>Faculty member</term><term>Faculty members</term><term>Faculty positions</term><term>Florida college</term><term>Future interest</term><term>Graduation requirements</term><term>Greatest difference</term><term>Information expression</term><term>Instructor</term><term>Instructor quality</term><term>Instructor type</term><term>Interaction effect</term><term>Junior students</term><term>Main effect</term><term>Occlusion</term><term>Occlusion courses</term><term>Other students</term><term>Overall experience</term><term>Overall rating</term><term>Overall scores</term><term>Positive experience</term><term>Preclinical</term><term>Preclinical courses</term><term>Preclinical faculty</term><term>Preclinical prosthodontics</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Response scores</term><term>Second year</term><term>Senior students</term><term>Spring term</term><term>Student instructor</term><term>Student instructors</term><term>Student ratings</term><term>Student teaching</term><term>Students stimulation</term><term>Subject encouragement</term><term>Summer term</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: While facing a shortage of faculty members, dental schools need to be innovative in their educational methodologies. One approach to augment student learning would be to mentor dental students as participating faculty in current courses. A study was undertaken to evaluate dental students as instructors in preclinical prosthodontics and occlusion courses. Materials and Methods: In spring term 2003, three senior dental students (4DN) and four full‐time faculty were assigned as faculty for each of two preclinical courses: fixed prosthodontics and complete denture prosthodontics. In the summer term 2003, two junior dental students (3DN) and five full‐time faculty were assigned to teach in the occlusion preclinical course. Each course had previously been conducted with a total of seven full‐time faculty. Three types of outcome assessment were accomplished: (1) evaluation by the 2DN students of full‐time faculty and student instructors at the end of the course using a standardized university scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent); (2) a survey of student instructors about their experience; and (3) a course debriefing with selected 2DN students. Results: The overall mean instructor‐quality score assigned to the student instructors, 4.5 (SD, 0.7), was slightly higher than that of faculty instructors, 4.2 (SD, 0.9). Student instructors were rated higher than or equal to full‐time faculty based on the mean response scores for all ten evaluation questions. The greatest difference between faculty and student ratings was in the category of “respect and concern for the students” in all courses. In addition, information gathered from eight student instructors indicated that the experience was a very positive one overall with an increased interest in an academic career noted. Comments from the 2DN students in the debriefing sessions were positive about having student instructors. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that from the perspective of second year dental students, senior and junior dental students were accepted as preclinical instructors in prosthodontics and occlusion preclinical courses. Additionally, senior and junior students who participated in student teaching had a positive experience. The use of dental students as preclinical faculty in prosthodontics and occlusion appears to be a viable approach for mentoring students in careers in academics, providing student instructors with higher learning experiences, and supplementing the efforts of full‐time faculty.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>student instructors</json:string><json:string>prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>preclinical</json:string><json:string>dental students</json:string><json:string>educ</json:string><json:string>academic career</json:string><json:string>faculty instructors</json:string><json:string>dent educ</json:string><json:string>student instructor</json:string><json:string>evaluation form</json:string><json:string>dental education</json:string><json:string>instructor</json:string><json:string>faculty members</json:string><json:string>junior students</json:string><json:string>evaluation questions</json:string><json:string>dental school</json:string><json:string>faculty positions</json:string><json:string>academic year</json:string><json:string>occlusion</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>preclinical courses</json:string><json:string>florida college</json:string><json:string>dent educ adea</json:string><json:string>positive experience</json:string><json:string>preclinical faculty</json:string><json:string>overall rating</json:string><json:string>preclinical prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>education association</json:string><json:string>clinical education</json:string><json:string>second year</json:string><json:string>edentulous patient</json:string><json:string>graduation requirements</json:string><json:string>daily work</json:string><json:string>response scores</json:string><json:string>student teaching</json:string><json:string>summer term</json:string><json:string>overall scores</json:string><json:string>instructor type</json:string><json:string>interaction effect</json:string><json:string>course objectives</json:string><json:string>assignments communication</json:string><json:string>information expression</json:string><json:string>class availability</json:string><json:string>class respect</json:string><json:string>students stimulation</json:string><json:string>course facilitation</json:string><json:string>subject encouragement</json:string><json:string>senior students</json:string><json:string>main effect</json:string><json:string>overall experience</json:string><json:string>faculty member</json:string><json:string>future interest</json:string><json:string>other students</json:string><json:string>greatest difference</json:string><json:string>american college</json:string><json:string>occlusion courses</json:string><json:string>student ratings</json:string><json:string>spring term</json:string><json:string>private practice</json:string><json:string>instructor quality</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Arthur Nimmo DDS, FACP</name><affiliations><json:string>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Florida College of Dentistry.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Gail S. Mitchell RDH, MPH</name><affiliations><json:string>Director of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Florida College of Dentistry.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Randall D. Penfield PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Assistant Professor, Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Alana Hall DMD, MS</name><affiliations><json:string>Private practice, Ocala, FL.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental faculty</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental students</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental education</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>occlusion</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>prosthodontics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>preclinical</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOPR226</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-QKM4Q83K-6</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Purpose: While facing a shortage of faculty members, dental schools need to be innovative in their educational methodologies. One approach to augment student learning would be to mentor dental students as participating faculty in current courses. A study was undertaken to evaluate dental students as instructors in preclinical prosthodontics and occlusion courses. Materials and Methods: In spring term 2003, three senior dental students (4DN) and four full‐time faculty were assigned as faculty for each of two preclinical courses: fixed prosthodontics and complete denture prosthodontics. In the summer term 2003, two junior dental students (3DN) and five full‐time faculty were assigned to teach in the occlusion preclinical course. Each course had previously been conducted with a total of seven full‐time faculty. Three types of outcome assessment were accomplished: (1) evaluation by the 2DN students of full‐time faculty and student instructors at the end of the course using a standardized university scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent); (2) a survey of student instructors about their experience; and (3) a course debriefing with selected 2DN students. Results: The overall mean instructor‐quality score assigned to the student instructors, 4.5 (SD, 0.7), was slightly higher than that of faculty instructors, 4.2 (SD, 0.9). Student instructors were rated higher than or equal to full‐time faculty based on the mean response scores for all ten evaluation questions. The greatest difference between faculty and student ratings was in the category of “respect and concern for the students” in all courses. In addition, information gathered from eight student instructors indicated that the experience was a very positive one overall with an increased interest in an academic career noted. Comments from the 2DN students in the debriefing sessions were positive about having student instructors. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that from the perspective of second year dental students, senior and junior dental students were accepted as preclinical instructors in prosthodontics and occlusion preclinical courses. Additionally, senior and junior students who participated in student teaching had a positive experience. The use of dental students as preclinical faculty in prosthodontics and occlusion appears to be a viable approach for mentoring students in careers in academics, providing student instructors with higher learning experiences, and supplementing the efforts of full‐time faculty.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.964</score><pdfWordCount>2964</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>19764</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>594 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>367</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>2507</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Evaluation of Dental Students as Instructors in Preclinical Prosthodontics and Occlusion Courses</title><pmid><json:string>17672831</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Prosthodontics</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1059-941X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1532-849X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOPR</json:string></publisherId><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>400</first><last>405</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1974</json:string><json:string>2002</json:string><json:string>2007</json:string><json:string>2003</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Educational Leadership, Policy, and Foundations</json:string><json:string>Department of Educational and Psychological Studies</json:string><json:string>University of Florida College of Dentistry</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, University of Florida College of Dentistry</json:string><json:string>University of Florida Institutional Review Board</json:string><json:string>American Dental Education Association</json:string><json:string>American College of Prosthodontists</json:string><json:string>University of Florida</json:string><json:string>University of Miami</json:string><json:string>ADEA</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Professor</json:string><json:string>Gail S. Mitchell</json:string><json:string>P.O. Box</json:string><json:string>Linda Behar-Hornstein</json:string><json:string>Student</json:string><json:string>Randall D. Pen</json:string><json:string>Session</json:string><json:string>Arthur Nimmo</json:string><json:string>Alana Hall</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>WA</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Petropoulos et al</json:string><json:string>Bibb et al</json:string><json:string>Nuckles et al</json:string><json:string>Nimmo et al</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-QKM4Q83K-6</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences de l'education</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00226.x</json:string></doi><id>7FF49FF77F22DD3C02AC7C08144BF8ABA96F0499</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7FF49FF77F22DD3C02AC7C08144BF8ABA96F0499/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7FF49FF77F22DD3C02AC7C08144BF8ABA96F0499/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7FF49FF77F22DD3C02AC7C08144BF8ABA96F0499/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Evaluation of Dental Students as Instructors in Preclinical Prosthodontics and Occlusion Courses</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-09"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Evaluation of Dental Students as Instructors in Preclinical Prosthodontics and Occlusion Courses</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Arthur</forename><surname>Nimmo</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, FACP</roleName></persName><affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Florida College of Dentistry.<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Gail S.</forename><surname>Mitchell</surname><roleName type="degree">RDH, MPH</roleName></persName><affiliation>Director of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Florida College of Dentistry.<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Randall D.</forename><surname>Penfield</surname><roleName type="degree">PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Alana</forename><surname>Hall</surname><roleName type="degree">DMD, MS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Private practice, Ocala, FL.</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">7FF49FF77F22DD3C02AC7C08144BF8ABA96F0499</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-QKM4Q83K-6</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00226.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOPR226</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOPR.JOPR226.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title><idno type="pISSN">1059-941X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jopr.2007.16.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">JOPR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">16</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="400">400</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="405">405</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-09"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>
<hi rend="italic"><emph><span>Purpose:</span></emph></hi> While facing a shortage of faculty members, dental schools need to be innovative in their educational methodologies. One approach to augment student learning would be to mentor dental students as participating faculty in current courses. A study was undertaken to evaluate dental students as instructors in preclinical prosthodontics and occlusion courses.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic"><emph><span>Materials and Methods:</span></emph></hi> In spring term 2003, three senior dental students (4DN) and four full‐time faculty were assigned as faculty for each of two preclinical courses: fixed prosthodontics and complete denture prosthodontics. In the summer term 2003, two junior dental students (3DN) and five full‐time faculty were assigned to teach in the occlusion preclinical course. Each course had previously been conducted with a total of seven full‐time faculty. Three types of outcome assessment were accomplished: (1) evaluation by the 2DN students of full‐time faculty and student instructors at the end of the course using a standardized university scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent); (2) a survey of student instructors about their experience; and (3) a course debriefing with selected 2DN students.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic"><emph><span>Results:</span></emph></hi> The overall mean instructor‐quality score assigned to the student instructors, 4.5 (SD, 0.7), was slightly higher than that of faculty instructors, 4.2 (SD, 0.9). Student instructors were rated higher than or equal to full‐time faculty based on the mean response scores for all ten evaluation questions. The greatest difference between faculty and student ratings was in the category of “respect and concern for the students” in all courses. In addition, information gathered from eight student instructors indicated that the experience was a very positive one overall with an increased interest in an academic career noted. Comments from the 2DN students in the debriefing sessions were positive about having student instructors.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic"><emph><span>Conclusions:</span></emph></hi> This study demonstrated that from the perspective of second year dental students, senior and junior dental students were accepted as preclinical instructors in prosthodontics and occlusion preclinical courses. Additionally, senior and junior students who participated in student teaching had a positive experience. The use of dental students as preclinical faculty in prosthodontics and occlusion appears to be a viable approach for mentoring students in careers in academics, providing student instructors with higher learning experiences, and supplementing the efforts of full‐time faculty.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">dental faculty</term><term xml:id="k2">dental students</term><term xml:id="k3">dental education</term><term xml:id="k4">occlusion</term><term xml:id="k5">prosthodontics</term><term xml:id="k6">preclinical</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Academics/Education</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7FF49FF77F22DD3C02AC7C08144BF8ABA96F0499/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</doi><issn type="print">1059-941X</issn><issn type="electronic">1532-849X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOPR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS">Journal of Prosthodontics</title><title type="subtitle">Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09005"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jopr.2007.16.issue-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="16">16</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-09">September/October 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="11" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00226.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOPR226"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1"><sc>Academics/Education</sc></title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-08-02"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-08-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-31"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="400">400</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="405">405</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><i>Correspondence to: Arthur Nimmo, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Florida College of Dentistry, P.O. Box 100435, Gainesville, FL 32610‐0435. E‐mail:</i>
animmo@dental.ufl.edu
<email>animmo@dental.ufl.edu</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOPR.JOPR226.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted April 3, 2006.</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="14"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Evaluation of Dental Students as Instructors in Preclinical Prosthodontics and Occlusion Courses</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Arthur</givenNames><familyName>Nimmo</familyName><degrees>DDS, FACP</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Gail S.</givenNames><familyName>Mitchell</familyName><degrees>RDH, MPH</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Randall D.</givenNames><familyName>Penfield</familyName><degrees>PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Alana</givenNames><familyName>Hall</familyName><degrees>DMD, MS</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Florida College of Dentistry.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Director of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Florida College of Dentistry.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3"><unparsedAffiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4"><unparsedAffiliation>Private practice, Ocala, FL.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">dental faculty</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">dental students</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">dental education</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">occlusion</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">prosthodontics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">preclinical</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p> <i><span cssStyle="text-decoration:underline">Purpose:</span></i> While facing a shortage of faculty members, dental schools need to be innovative in their educational methodologies. One approach to augment student learning would be to mentor dental students as participating faculty in current courses. A study was undertaken to evaluate dental students as instructors in preclinical prosthodontics and occlusion courses.</p><p> <i><span cssStyle="text-decoration:underline">Materials and Methods:</span></i> In spring term 2003, three senior dental students (4DN) and four full‐time faculty were assigned as faculty for each of two preclinical courses: fixed prosthodontics and complete denture prosthodontics. In the summer term 2003, two junior dental students (3DN) and five full‐time faculty were assigned to teach in the occlusion preclinical course. Each course had previously been conducted with a total of seven full‐time faculty. Three types of outcome assessment were accomplished: (1) evaluation by the 2DN students of full‐time faculty and student instructors at the end of the course using a standardized university scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent); (2) a survey of student instructors about their experience; and (3) a course debriefing with selected 2DN students.</p><p> <i><span cssStyle="text-decoration:underline">Results:</span></i> The overall mean instructor‐quality score assigned to the student instructors, 4.5 (SD, 0.7), was slightly higher than that of faculty instructors, 4.2 (SD, 0.9). Student instructors were rated higher than or equal to full‐time faculty based on the mean response scores for all ten evaluation questions. The greatest difference between faculty and student ratings was in the category of “respect and concern for the students” in all courses. In addition, information gathered from eight student instructors indicated that the experience was a very positive one overall with an increased interest in an academic career noted. Comments from the 2DN students in the debriefing sessions were positive about having student instructors.</p><p> <i><span cssStyle="text-decoration:underline">Conclusions:</span></i> This study demonstrated that from the perspective of second year dental students, senior and junior dental students were accepted as preclinical instructors in prosthodontics and occlusion preclinical courses. Additionally, senior and junior students who participated in student teaching had a positive experience. The use of dental students as preclinical faculty in prosthodontics and occlusion appears to be a viable approach for mentoring students in careers in academics, providing student instructors with higher learning experiences, and supplementing the efforts of full‐time faculty.</p><!--
J Prosthodont ****;**:1-6. Copyright © 2007 by The American College of Prosthodontists.
--></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="n-fnt-1" numbered="no"><p>Presented at the Annual Session of the American Dental Education Association in Seattle, WA, on March 8, 2004</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Evaluation of Dental Students as Instructors in Preclinical Prosthodontics and Occlusion Courses</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Evaluation of Dental Students as Instructors in Preclinical Prosthodontics and Occlusion Courses</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Arthur</namePart><namePart type="family">Nimmo</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, FACP</namePart><affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Florida College of Dentistry.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gail S.</namePart><namePart type="family">Mitchell</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">RDH, MPH</namePart><affiliation>Director of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Florida College of Dentistry.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Randall D.</namePart><namePart type="family">Penfield</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">PhD</namePart><affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Alana</namePart><namePart type="family">Hall</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DMD, MS</namePart><affiliation>Private practice, Ocala, FL.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-09</dateIssued><edition>Accepted April 3, 2006.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">14</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">12</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Purpose: While facing a shortage of faculty members, dental schools need to be innovative in their educational methodologies. One approach to augment student learning would be to mentor dental students as participating faculty in current courses. A study was undertaken to evaluate dental students as instructors in preclinical prosthodontics and occlusion courses. Materials and Methods: In spring term 2003, three senior dental students (4DN) and four full‐time faculty were assigned as faculty for each of two preclinical courses: fixed prosthodontics and complete denture prosthodontics. In the summer term 2003, two junior dental students (3DN) and five full‐time faculty were assigned to teach in the occlusion preclinical course. Each course had previously been conducted with a total of seven full‐time faculty. Three types of outcome assessment were accomplished: (1) evaluation by the 2DN students of full‐time faculty and student instructors at the end of the course using a standardized university scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent); (2) a survey of student instructors about their experience; and (3) a course debriefing with selected 2DN students. Results: The overall mean instructor‐quality score assigned to the student instructors, 4.5 (SD, 0.7), was slightly higher than that of faculty instructors, 4.2 (SD, 0.9). Student instructors were rated higher than or equal to full‐time faculty based on the mean response scores for all ten evaluation questions. The greatest difference between faculty and student ratings was in the category of “respect and concern for the students” in all courses. In addition, information gathered from eight student instructors indicated that the experience was a very positive one overall with an increased interest in an academic career noted. Comments from the 2DN students in the debriefing sessions were positive about having student instructors. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that from the perspective of second year dental students, senior and junior dental students were accepted as preclinical instructors in prosthodontics and occlusion preclinical courses. Additionally, senior and junior students who participated in student teaching had a positive experience. The use of dental students as preclinical faculty in prosthodontics and occlusion appears to be a viable approach for mentoring students in careers in academics, providing student instructors with higher learning experiences, and supplementing the efforts of full‐time faculty.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dental faculty</topic><topic>dental students</topic><topic>dental education</topic><topic>occlusion</topic><topic>prosthodontics</topic><topic>preclinical</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Prosthodontics</title><subTitle>Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry</subTitle></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1059-941X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1532-849X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1532-849X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOPR</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>16</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>400</start><end>405</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">7FF49FF77F22DD3C02AC7C08144BF8ABA96F0499</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-QKM4Q83K-6</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00226.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOPR226</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7FF49FF77F22DD3C02AC7C08144BF8ABA96F0499/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003F52 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003F52 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:7FF49FF77F22DD3C02AC7C08144BF8ABA96F0499
|texte= Evaluation of Dental Students as Instructors in Preclinical Prosthodontics and Occlusion Courses
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |