Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures – validation of an original force measurement system
Identifieur interne : 003F00 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003E99; suivant : 003F01Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures – validation of an original force measurement system
Auteurs : O. Fromentin ; C. Lassauzay ; S. Abi Nader ; J. Feine ; R. F. De Albuquerque JuniorSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2010-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Adjustable angulations, Altman, Altman analysis, Angulation, Attachment, Attachment parts, Attachment retention, Attachment retention assessment, Attachment system, Attachment systems, Baseline, Blackwell publishing, Chair side tests, Clinical application, Clinical settings, Comparative study, Crosshead speed, Cycling, Dent, Denture, Different attachment systems, Digital force measurement gauge, Edentulous patients, Experimental condition, Force measurement apparatus, Force measurement gauge, Imada, Implant, Implant analogue, Implant angulation, Implant angulations, Implant overdentures, Instron, Load cell, Magnetic angulation gauge, Main changes, Mandibular, Mandibular overdenture, Mandibular overdentures, Masticatory function, Matrix, Maximum dislodging forces, Mcgill university, Mechanical retention, Nancial support, Nylon inserts, Occlusal plane, Oral environment, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Other hand, Overdenture, Overdenture attachments, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Peak load, Peak load forces, Peak load measurements, Peak loads, Pilot study, Previous studies, Prospective evaluation, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Prosthetic aspects, Prosthetic attachments, Prosthodont, Rectangular piece, Relative peak load, Relevant difference, Retention, Retentive properties, Standard deviation, Standard deviations, Student newman keuls post, Surveyor table, Testing machine, Upper limits, Vertical wheel.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Adjustable angulations, Altman, Altman analysis, Angulation, Attachment, Attachment parts, Attachment retention, Attachment retention assessment, Attachment system, Attachment systems, Baseline, Blackwell publishing, Chair side tests, Clinical application, Clinical settings, Comparative study, Crosshead speed, Cycling, Dent, Denture, Different attachment systems, Digital force measurement gauge, Edentulous patients, Experimental condition, Force measurement apparatus, Force measurement gauge, Imada, Implant, Implant analogue, Implant angulation, Implant angulations, Implant overdentures, Instron, Load cell, Magnetic angulation gauge, Main changes, Mandibular, Mandibular overdenture, Mandibular overdentures, Masticatory function, Matrix, Maximum dislodging forces, Mcgill university, Mechanical retention, Nancial support, Nylon inserts, Occlusal plane, Oral environment, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Other hand, Overdenture, Overdenture attachments, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Peak load, Peak load forces, Peak load measurements, Peak loads, Pilot study, Previous studies, Prospective evaluation, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Prosthetic aspects, Prosthetic attachments, Prosthodont, Rectangular piece, Relative peak load, Relevant difference, Retention, Retentive properties, Standard deviation, Standard deviations, Student newman keuls post, Surveyor table, Testing machine, Upper limits, Vertical wheel.
Abstract
Summary The aim of this study was to validate an original portable device to measure attachment retention of implant overdentures both in the lab and in clinical settings. The device was built with a digital force measurement gauge (Imada) secured to a vertical wheel stand associated with a customized support to hold and position the denture in adjustable angulations. Sixteen matrix and patrix cylindrical stud attachments (Locator®) were randomly assigned as in vitro test specimens. Attachment abutments were secured in an implant analogue hung to the digital force gauge or to the load cell of a traction machine used as the gold standard (Instron Universal Testing Machine). Matrices were secured in a denture duplicate attached to the customized support, permitting reproducibility of their position on both pulling devices. Attachment retention in the axial direction was evaluated by measuring maximum dislodging force or peak load during five consecutive linear dislodgments of each attachment on both devices. After a wear simulation, retention was measured again at several time periods. The peak load measurements with the customized Imada device were similar to those obtained with the gold standard Instron machine. These findings suggest that the proposed portable device can provide accurate information on the retentive properties of attachment systems for removable dental prostheses.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02020.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:7F206ED42502304B0B766D16B7FFD0662BA3BC66Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures – validation of an original force measurement system</title><author><name sortKey="Fromentin, O" sort="Fromentin, O" uniqKey="Fromentin O" first="O." last="Fromentin">O. Fromentin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lassauzay, C" sort="Lassauzay, C" uniqKey="Lassauzay C" first="C." last="Lassauzay">C. Lassauzay</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Univ Clermont 1, UFR Odontologie EA3847</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CHU Clermont‐Ferrand, Service d’Odontologie, Clermont‐Ferrand, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Abi Nader, S" sort="Abi Nader, S" uniqKey="Abi Nader S" first="S." last="Abi Nader">S. Abi Nader</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Feine, J" sort="Feine, J" uniqKey="Feine J" first="J." last="Feine">J. Feine</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Albuquerque Junior, R F" sort="De Albuquerque Junior, R F" uniqKey="De Albuquerque Junior R" first="R. F." last="De Albuquerque Junior">R. F. De Albuquerque Junior</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7F206ED42502304B0B766D16B7FFD0662BA3BC66</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02020.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7F206ED42502304B0B766D16B7FFD0662BA3BC66/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003F00</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003F00</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures – validation of an original force measurement system</title><author><name sortKey="Fromentin, O" sort="Fromentin, O" uniqKey="Fromentin O" first="O." last="Fromentin">O. Fromentin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lassauzay, C" sort="Lassauzay, C" uniqKey="Lassauzay C" first="C." last="Lassauzay">C. Lassauzay</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Univ Clermont 1, UFR Odontologie EA3847</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CHU Clermont‐Ferrand, Service d’Odontologie, Clermont‐Ferrand, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Abi Nader, S" sort="Abi Nader, S" uniqKey="Abi Nader S" first="S." last="Abi Nader">S. Abi Nader</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Feine, J" sort="Feine, J" uniqKey="Feine J" first="J." last="Feine">J. Feine</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Albuquerque Junior, R F" sort="De Albuquerque Junior, R F" uniqKey="De Albuquerque Junior R" first="R. F." last="De Albuquerque Junior">R. F. De Albuquerque Junior</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">37</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="54">54</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="62">62</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-01">2010-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Adjustable angulations</term><term>Altman</term><term>Altman analysis</term><term>Angulation</term><term>Attachment</term><term>Attachment parts</term><term>Attachment retention</term><term>Attachment retention assessment</term><term>Attachment system</term><term>Attachment systems</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Chair side tests</term><term>Clinical application</term><term>Clinical settings</term><term>Comparative study</term><term>Crosshead speed</term><term>Cycling</term><term>Dent</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different attachment systems</term><term>Digital force measurement gauge</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Experimental condition</term><term>Force measurement apparatus</term><term>Force measurement gauge</term><term>Imada</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant analogue</term><term>Implant angulation</term><term>Implant angulations</term><term>Implant overdentures</term><term>Instron</term><term>Load cell</term><term>Magnetic angulation gauge</term><term>Main changes</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdenture</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Matrix</term><term>Maximum dislodging forces</term><term>Mcgill university</term><term>Mechanical retention</term><term>Nancial support</term><term>Nylon inserts</term><term>Occlusal plane</term><term>Oral environment</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture attachments</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Peak load</term><term>Peak load forces</term><term>Peak load measurements</term><term>Peak loads</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Prospective evaluation</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic aspects</term><term>Prosthetic attachments</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Rectangular piece</term><term>Relative peak load</term><term>Relevant difference</term><term>Retention</term><term>Retentive properties</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Standard deviations</term><term>Student newman keuls post</term><term>Surveyor table</term><term>Testing machine</term><term>Upper limits</term><term>Vertical wheel</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Adjustable angulations</term><term>Altman</term><term>Altman analysis</term><term>Angulation</term><term>Attachment</term><term>Attachment parts</term><term>Attachment retention</term><term>Attachment retention assessment</term><term>Attachment system</term><term>Attachment systems</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Chair side tests</term><term>Clinical application</term><term>Clinical settings</term><term>Comparative study</term><term>Crosshead speed</term><term>Cycling</term><term>Dent</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different attachment systems</term><term>Digital force measurement gauge</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Experimental condition</term><term>Force measurement apparatus</term><term>Force measurement gauge</term><term>Imada</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant analogue</term><term>Implant angulation</term><term>Implant angulations</term><term>Implant overdentures</term><term>Instron</term><term>Load cell</term><term>Magnetic angulation gauge</term><term>Main changes</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdenture</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Matrix</term><term>Maximum dislodging forces</term><term>Mcgill university</term><term>Mechanical retention</term><term>Nancial support</term><term>Nylon inserts</term><term>Occlusal plane</term><term>Oral environment</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral quality</term><term>Oral rehabil</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture attachments</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Peak load</term><term>Peak load forces</term><term>Peak load measurements</term><term>Peak loads</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Prospective evaluation</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic aspects</term><term>Prosthetic attachments</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Rectangular piece</term><term>Relative peak load</term><term>Relevant difference</term><term>Retention</term><term>Retentive properties</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Standard deviations</term><term>Student newman keuls post</term><term>Surveyor table</term><term>Testing machine</term><term>Upper limits</term><term>Vertical wheel</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Summary The aim of this study was to validate an original portable device to measure attachment retention of implant overdentures both in the lab and in clinical settings. The device was built with a digital force measurement gauge (Imada) secured to a vertical wheel stand associated with a customized support to hold and position the denture in adjustable angulations. Sixteen matrix and patrix cylindrical stud attachments (Locator®) were randomly assigned as in vitro test specimens. Attachment abutments were secured in an implant analogue hung to the digital force gauge or to the load cell of a traction machine used as the gold standard (Instron Universal Testing Machine). Matrices were secured in a denture duplicate attached to the customized support, permitting reproducibility of their position on both pulling devices. Attachment retention in the axial direction was evaluated by measuring maximum dislodging force or peak load during five consecutive linear dislodgments of each attachment on both devices. After a wear simulation, retention was measured again at several time periods. The peak load measurements with the customized Imada device were similar to those obtained with the gold standard Instron machine. These findings suggest that the proposed portable device can provide accurate information on the retentive properties of attachment systems for removable dental prostheses.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>imada</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>instron</json:string><json:string>angulation</json:string><json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>peak load forces</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>cycling</json:string><json:string>prosthet</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>prosthodont</json:string><json:string>altman</json:string><json:string>attachment</json:string><json:string>peak load</json:string><json:string>peak loads</json:string><json:string>attachment retention</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>implant overdentures</json:string><json:string>occlusal plane</json:string><json:string>overdenture attachments</json:string><json:string>oral rehabil</json:string><json:string>attachment systems</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>matrix</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>attachment parts</json:string><json:string>peak load measurements</json:string><json:string>attachment retention assessment</json:string><json:string>testing machine</json:string><json:string>altman analysis</json:string><json:string>crosshead speed</json:string><json:string>previous studies</json:string><json:string>attachment system</json:string><json:string>prosthetic attachments</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>force measurement gauge</json:string><json:string>surveyor table</json:string><json:string>different attachment systems</json:string><json:string>retention</json:string><json:string>clinical settings</json:string><json:string>nylon inserts</json:string><json:string>magnetic angulation gauge</json:string><json:string>adjustable angulations</json:string><json:string>standard deviations</json:string><json:string>masticatory function</json:string><json:string>oral quality</json:string><json:string>relative peak load</json:string><json:string>main changes</json:string><json:string>standard deviation</json:string><json:string>relevant difference</json:string><json:string>digital force measurement gauge</json:string><json:string>mcgill university</json:string><json:string>student newman keuls post</json:string><json:string>experimental condition</json:string><json:string>upper limits</json:string><json:string>clinical application</json:string><json:string>chair side tests</json:string><json:string>maximum dislodging forces</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>pilot study</json:string><json:string>implant angulations</json:string><json:string>oral environment</json:string><json:string>nancial support</json:string><json:string>implant analogue</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>force measurement apparatus</json:string><json:string>prospective evaluation</json:string><json:string>load cell</json:string><json:string>vertical wheel</json:string><json:string>retentive properties</json:string><json:string>prosthetic aspects</json:string><json:string>comparative study</json:string><json:string>rectangular piece</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdenture</json:string><json:string>implant angulation</json:string><json:string>mechanical retention</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>O. FROMENTIN</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP</json:string><json:string>Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>C. LASSAUZAY</name><affiliations><json:string>Univ Clermont 1, UFR Odontologie EA3847</json:string><json:string>CHU Clermont‐Ferrand, Service d’Odontologie, Clermont‐Ferrand, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>S. ABI NADER</name><affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>J. FEINE</name><affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>R. F. De ALBUQUERQUE JUNIOR</name><affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada</json:string><json:string>Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>attachment</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>retention</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peak force</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>validation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>overdenture</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOOR2020</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-03FXXDRR-0</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Summary The aim of this study was to validate an original portable device to measure attachment retention of implant overdentures both in the lab and in clinical settings. The device was built with a digital force measurement gauge (Imada) secured to a vertical wheel stand associated with a customized support to hold and position the denture in adjustable angulations. Sixteen matrix and patrix cylindrical stud attachments (Locator®) were randomly assigned as in vitro test specimens. Attachment abutments were secured in an implant analogue hung to the digital force gauge or to the load cell of a traction machine used as the gold standard (Instron Universal Testing Machine). Matrices were secured in a denture duplicate attached to the customized support, permitting reproducibility of their position on both pulling devices. Attachment retention in the axial direction was evaluated by measuring maximum dislodging force or peak load during five consecutive linear dislodgments of each attachment on both devices. After a wear simulation, retention was measured again at several time periods. The peak load measurements with the customized Imada device were similar to those obtained with the gold standard Instron machine. These findings suggest that the proposed portable device can provide accurate information on the retentive properties of attachment systems for removable dental prostheses.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.764</score><pdfWordCount>4244</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>27229</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>210</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1405</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures – validation of an original force measurement system</title><pmid><json:string>19912482</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>54</first><last>62</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>two thousand</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>GC American Corporation, Alsip, IL, USA</json:string><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Straumann Canada Limited, Burlington, ON, CA</json:string><json:string>Kiel University</json:string><json:string>Denis Diderot University</json:string><json:string>Imada Inc.</json:string><json:string>Instron Canad Inc.</json:string><json:string>Dentsply International, York</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Kiel</json:string><json:string>Northbrook</json:string><json:string>Brazil</json:string><json:string>Montreal</json:string><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>Seattle</json:string><json:string>Clermont-Ferrand</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>France</json:string><json:string>WA</json:string><json:string>Sao Paulo</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Rutkunas et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-03FXXDRR-0</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02020.x</json:string></doi><id>7F206ED42502304B0B766D16B7FFD0662BA3BC66</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7F206ED42502304B0B766D16B7FFD0662BA3BC66/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7F206ED42502304B0B766D16B7FFD0662BA3BC66/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7F206ED42502304B0B766D16B7FFD0662BA3BC66/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures – validation of an original force measurement system</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-01"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures – validation of an original force measurement system</title><title level="a" type="short">VALIDATION OF A DEVICE FOR ATTACHMENT RETENTION ASSESSMENT</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">O.</forename><surname>FROMENTIN</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP</affiliation><affiliation>Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">C.</forename><surname>LASSAUZAY</surname></persName><affiliation>Univ Clermont 1, UFR Odontologie EA3847</affiliation><affiliation>CHU Clermont‐Ferrand, Service d’Odontologie, Clermont‐Ferrand, France<address><country key="FR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">S.</forename><surname>ABI NADER</surname></persName><affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada<address><country key="CA"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">J.</forename><surname>FEINE</surname></persName><affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada<address><country key="CA"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">R. F.</forename><surname>
De ALBUQUERQUE JUNIOR</surname></persName><affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada<address><country key="CA"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">7F206ED42502304B0B766D16B7FFD0662BA3BC66</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-03FXXDRR-0</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02020.x</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR2020</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR2020.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jor.2009.37.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">37</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="54">54</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="62">62</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-01"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Summary </hi> The aim of this study was to validate an original portable device to measure attachment retention of implant overdentures both in the lab and in clinical settings. The device was built with a digital force measurement gauge (Imada) secured to a vertical wheel stand associated with a customized support to hold and position the denture in adjustable angulations. Sixteen matrix and patrix cylindrical stud attachments (Locator<hi rend="superscript">®</hi>) were randomly assigned as <hi rend="italic">in vitro</hi> test specimens. Attachment abutments were secured in an implant analogue hung to the digital force gauge or to the load cell of a traction machine used as the gold standard (Instron Universal Testing Machine). Matrices were secured in a denture duplicate attached to the customized support, permitting reproducibility of their position on both pulling devices. Attachment retention in the axial direction was evaluated by measuring maximum dislodging force or peak load during five consecutive linear dislodgments of each attachment on both devices. After a wear simulation, retention was measured again at several time periods. The peak load measurements with the customized Imada device were similar to those obtained with the gold standard Instron machine. These findings suggest that the proposed portable device can provide accurate information on the retentive properties of attachment systems for removable dental prostheses.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">attachment</term><term xml:id="k2">retention</term><term xml:id="k3">peak force</term><term xml:id="k4">validation</term><term xml:id="k5">overdenture</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7F206ED42502304B0B766D16B7FFD0662BA3BC66/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jor.2009.37.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="37">37</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-01">January 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="9" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02020.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR2020"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-11-11"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2009-12-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="54">54</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="62">62</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Rubens F. de Albuquerque Junior, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Room M‐60C, 3640 University Street, H3A 2B2 Montreal, QC, Canada.
E‐mail: <email>rubens.albuquerque@mcgill.ca</email>; <email>ralbuque@forp.usp.br</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR2020.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 10 October 2009</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="7"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures – validation of an original force measurement system</title><title type="shortAuthors">O. FROMENTIN <i>et al.</i></title><title type="short">VALIDATION OF A DEVICE FOR ATTACHMENT RETENTION ASSESSMENT</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2"><personName><givenNames>O.</givenNames><familyName>FROMENTIN</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a3 #a4"><personName><givenNames>C.</givenNames><familyName>LASSAUZAY</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a5"><personName><givenNames>S.</givenNames><familyName>ABI NADER</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a5"><personName><givenNames>J.</givenNames><familyName>FEINE</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a5 #a6"><personName><givenNames>R. F.</givenNames><familyName>
De ALBUQUERQUE JUNIOR</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3"><unparsedAffiliation>Univ Clermont 1, UFR Odontologie EA3847</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>CHU Clermont‐Ferrand, Service d’Odontologie, Clermont‐Ferrand, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5" countryCode="CA"><unparsedAffiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a6" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">attachment</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">retention</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">peak force</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">validation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">overdenture</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Summary </b> The aim of this study was to validate an original portable device to measure attachment retention of implant overdentures both in the lab and in clinical settings. The device was built with a digital force measurement gauge (Imada) secured to a vertical wheel stand associated with a customized support to hold and position the denture in adjustable angulations. Sixteen matrix and patrix cylindrical stud attachments (Locator<sup>®</sup>) were randomly assigned as <i>in vitro</i> test specimens. Attachment abutments were secured in an implant analogue hung to the digital force gauge or to the load cell of a traction machine used as the gold standard (Instron Universal Testing Machine). Matrices were secured in a denture duplicate attached to the customized support, permitting reproducibility of their position on both pulling devices. Attachment retention in the axial direction was evaluated by measuring maximum dislodging force or peak load during five consecutive linear dislodgments of each attachment on both devices. After a wear simulation, retention was measured again at several time periods. The peak load measurements with the customized Imada device were similar to those obtained with the gold standard Instron machine. These findings suggest that the proposed portable device can provide accurate information on the retentive properties of attachment systems for removable dental prostheses.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures – validation of an original force measurement system</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>VALIDATION OF A DEVICE FOR ATTACHMENT RETENTION ASSESSMENT</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures – validation of an original force measurement system</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">O.</namePart><namePart type="family">FROMENTIN</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Service of Odontology, Hôtel‐Dieu Hospital, AP‐HP</affiliation><affiliation>Paris 7 – Denis Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C.</namePart><namePart type="family">LASSAUZAY</namePart><affiliation>Univ Clermont 1, UFR Odontologie EA3847</affiliation><affiliation>CHU Clermont‐Ferrand, Service d’Odontologie, Clermont‐Ferrand, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">S.</namePart><namePart type="family">ABI NADER</namePart><affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J.</namePart><namePart type="family">FEINE</namePart><affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R. F.</namePart><namePart type="family">De ALBUQUERQUE JUNIOR</namePart><affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada</affiliation><affiliation>Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-01</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 10 October 2009</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">7</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Summary The aim of this study was to validate an original portable device to measure attachment retention of implant overdentures both in the lab and in clinical settings. The device was built with a digital force measurement gauge (Imada) secured to a vertical wheel stand associated with a customized support to hold and position the denture in adjustable angulations. Sixteen matrix and patrix cylindrical stud attachments (Locator®) were randomly assigned as in vitro test specimens. Attachment abutments were secured in an implant analogue hung to the digital force gauge or to the load cell of a traction machine used as the gold standard (Instron Universal Testing Machine). Matrices were secured in a denture duplicate attached to the customized support, permitting reproducibility of their position on both pulling devices. Attachment retention in the axial direction was evaluated by measuring maximum dislodging force or peak load during five consecutive linear dislodgments of each attachment on both devices. After a wear simulation, retention was measured again at several time periods. The peak load measurements with the customized Imada device were similar to those obtained with the gold standard Instron machine. These findings suggest that the proposed portable device can provide accurate information on the retentive properties of attachment systems for removable dental prostheses.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>attachment</topic><topic>retention</topic><topic>peak force</topic><topic>validation</topic><topic>overdenture</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>37</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>54</start><end>62</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">7F206ED42502304B0B766D16B7FFD0662BA3BC66</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-03FXXDRR-0</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02020.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR2020</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7F206ED42502304B0B766D16B7FFD0662BA3BC66/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003F00 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003F00 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:7F206ED42502304B0B766D16B7FFD0662BA3BC66
|texte= Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures – validation of an original force measurement system
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |