One‐Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and RFA Study
Identifieur interne : 003E55 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003E54; suivant : 003E56One‐Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and RFA Study
Auteurs : Lars Sennerby ; Peter Andersson ; Damiano Verrocchi ; Rauno Viinam KiSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2012-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment abutment, Abutment connection, Appl osseointegration, Average bone loss, Bimodal, Bimodal surface, Biomechanical aspects, Bone density, Bone formation, Bone integration, Bone loss, Bone quality, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical performance, Clinical studies, Clinical study, Consecutive edentate patients, Consecutive patients, Dent, Dental implants, Different surfaces, Early failures, Favorable bone tissue reaction, Full bridges, Gothenburg university, Immediate loading, Immediate occlusal loading, Implant, Implant diameter, Implant failure, Implant failures, Implant placement, Implant stability, Implant stability measurements, Implant stability quotient values, Implant treatment, Initial stability, Intraoral radiographs, Inverse correlation, Lars sennerby, Lekholm, Local anesthesia, Long implant, Mandible, Many cases, Marginal bone, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Mesial implants, Neoss, Neoss bimodal implants, Neoss implant, Neoss implant system, Neoss implants, Oral implant surfaces, Oral maxillofac implants, Osstell mentor, Posterior maxilla, Present study, Primary stability, Private practice, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic rehabilitation, Radiographic, Radiographic outcomes, Reference point, Relat, Resonance frequency analysis, Risk factors, Sahlgrenska academy, Sennerby, Short implants, Single tooth replacements, Sinus membrane elevation procedure, Soft bone, Soft bone densities, Third failure, Time point, Time points, Titanium implants, Wide implants.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment abutment, Abutment connection, Appl osseointegration, Average bone loss, Bimodal, Bimodal surface, Biomechanical aspects, Bone density, Bone formation, Bone integration, Bone loss, Bone quality, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical performance, Clinical studies, Clinical study, Consecutive edentate patients, Consecutive patients, Dent, Dental implants, Different surfaces, Early failures, Favorable bone tissue reaction, Full bridges, Gothenburg university, Immediate loading, Immediate occlusal loading, Implant, Implant diameter, Implant failure, Implant failures, Implant placement, Implant stability, Implant stability measurements, Implant stability quotient values, Implant treatment, Initial stability, Intraoral radiographs, Inverse correlation, Lars sennerby, Lekholm, Local anesthesia, Long implant, Mandible, Many cases, Marginal bone, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Mesial implants, Neoss, Neoss bimodal implants, Neoss implant, Neoss implant system, Neoss implants, Oral implant surfaces, Oral maxillofac implants, Osstell mentor, Posterior maxilla, Present study, Primary stability, Private practice, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic rehabilitation, Radiographic, Radiographic outcomes, Reference point, Relat, Resonance frequency analysis, Risk factors, Sahlgrenska academy, Sennerby, Short implants, Single tooth replacements, Sinus membrane elevation procedure, Soft bone, Soft bone densities, Third failure, Time point, Time points, Titanium implants, Wide implants.
Abstract
Background: The Neoss implant system has been available since 2004. Few studies documenting the clinical performance of this implant are available.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00273.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:7E54EAF697D15A4979DF3597115FE32EC23C7008Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">One‐Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and RFA Study</title><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, Lars" sort="Sennerby, Lars" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="Lars" last="Sennerby">Lars Sennerby</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice, Feltre, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biomaterials, Institute Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: lars.sennerby@biomaterials.gu.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Andersson, Peter" sort="Andersson, Peter" uniqKey="Andersson P" first="Peter" last="Andersson">Peter Andersson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice, Feltre, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Verrocchi, Damiano" sort="Verrocchi, Damiano" uniqKey="Verrocchi D" first="Damiano" last="Verrocchi">Damiano Verrocchi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Viinam Ki, Rauno" sort="Viinam Ki, Rauno" uniqKey="Viinam Ki R" first="Rauno" last="Viinam Ki">Rauno Viinam Ki</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice, Feltre, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7E54EAF697D15A4979DF3597115FE32EC23C7008</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00273.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7E54EAF697D15A4979DF3597115FE32EC23C7008/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003E55</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003E55</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">One‐Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and RFA Study</title><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, Lars" sort="Sennerby, Lars" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="Lars" last="Sennerby">Lars Sennerby</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice, Feltre, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biomaterials, Institute Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: lars.sennerby@biomaterials.gu.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Andersson, Peter" sort="Andersson, Peter" uniqKey="Andersson P" first="Peter" last="Andersson">Peter Andersson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice, Feltre, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Verrocchi, Damiano" sort="Verrocchi, Damiano" uniqKey="Verrocchi D" first="Damiano" last="Verrocchi">Damiano Verrocchi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Viinam Ki, Rauno" sort="Viinam Ki, Rauno" uniqKey="Viinam Ki R" first="Rauno" last="Viinam Ki">Rauno Viinam Ki</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice, Feltre, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="313">313</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="320">320</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-06">2012-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Appl osseointegration</term><term>Average bone loss</term><term>Bimodal</term><term>Bimodal surface</term><term>Biomechanical aspects</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone integration</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical performance</term><term>Clinical studies</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Consecutive edentate patients</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Different surfaces</term><term>Early failures</term><term>Favorable bone tissue reaction</term><term>Full bridges</term><term>Gothenburg university</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immediate occlusal loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant stability measurements</term><term>Implant stability quotient values</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Initial stability</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>Inverse correlation</term><term>Lars sennerby</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Local anesthesia</term><term>Long implant</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Many cases</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Mesial implants</term><term>Neoss</term><term>Neoss bimodal implants</term><term>Neoss implant</term><term>Neoss implant system</term><term>Neoss implants</term><term>Oral implant surfaces</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osstell mentor</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic rehabilitation</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic outcomes</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Relat</term><term>Resonance frequency analysis</term><term>Risk factors</term><term>Sahlgrenska academy</term><term>Sennerby</term><term>Short implants</term><term>Single tooth replacements</term><term>Sinus membrane elevation procedure</term><term>Soft bone</term><term>Soft bone densities</term><term>Third failure</term><term>Time point</term><term>Time points</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Wide implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Appl osseointegration</term><term>Average bone loss</term><term>Bimodal</term><term>Bimodal surface</term><term>Biomechanical aspects</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone integration</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical performance</term><term>Clinical studies</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Consecutive edentate patients</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Different surfaces</term><term>Early failures</term><term>Favorable bone tissue reaction</term><term>Full bridges</term><term>Gothenburg university</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immediate occlusal loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant stability measurements</term><term>Implant stability quotient values</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Initial stability</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>Inverse correlation</term><term>Lars sennerby</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Local anesthesia</term><term>Long implant</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Many cases</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Mesial implants</term><term>Neoss</term><term>Neoss bimodal implants</term><term>Neoss implant</term><term>Neoss implant system</term><term>Neoss implants</term><term>Oral implant surfaces</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osstell mentor</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic rehabilitation</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic outcomes</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Relat</term><term>Resonance frequency analysis</term><term>Risk factors</term><term>Sahlgrenska academy</term><term>Sennerby</term><term>Short implants</term><term>Single tooth replacements</term><term>Sinus membrane elevation procedure</term><term>Soft bone</term><term>Soft bone densities</term><term>Third failure</term><term>Time point</term><term>Time points</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Wide implants</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: The Neoss implant system has been available since 2004. Few studies documenting the clinical performance of this implant are available.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>neoss</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>sennerby</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>neoss implants</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>relat</json:string><json:string>bimodal</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>lekholm</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>implant stability</json:string><json:string>resonance frequency analysis</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>radiographic outcomes</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>intraoral radiographs</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>wide implants</json:string><json:string>bone quality</json:string><json:string>marginal bone</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>neoss bimodal implants</json:string><json:string>implant failures</json:string><json:string>implant diameter</json:string><json:string>early failures</json:string><json:string>primary stability</json:string><json:string>consecutive patients</json:string><json:string>posterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>neoss implant system</json:string><json:string>clinical studies</json:string><json:string>implant stability measurements</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>full bridges</json:string><json:string>many cases</json:string><json:string>clinical performance</json:string><json:string>sahlgrenska academy</json:string><json:string>gothenburg university</json:string><json:string>lars sennerby</json:string><json:string>neoss implant</json:string><json:string>appl osseointegration</json:string><json:string>local anesthesia</json:string><json:string>time points</json:string><json:string>osstell mentor</json:string><json:string>time point</json:string><json:string>prosthetic rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>soft bone</json:string><json:string>implant stability quotient values</json:string><json:string>consecutive edentate patients</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>reference point</json:string><json:string>abutment abutment</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>sinus membrane elevation procedure</json:string><json:string>favorable bone tissue reaction</json:string><json:string>bimodal surface</json:string><json:string>average bone loss</json:string><json:string>maxillary sinus</json:string><json:string>third failure</json:string><json:string>risk factors</json:string><json:string>long implant</json:string><json:string>bone density</json:string><json:string>bone formation</json:string><json:string>mesial implants</json:string><json:string>initial stability</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>single tooth replacements</json:string><json:string>biomechanical aspects</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>short implants</json:string><json:string>soft bone densities</json:string><json:string>inverse correlation</json:string><json:string>bone integration</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>immediate occlusal loading</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string><json:string>oral implant surfaces</json:string><json:string>different surfaces</json:string><json:string>private practice</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Lars Sennerby DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;</json:string><json:string>private practice, Feltre, Italy;</json:string><json:string>Department of Biomaterials, Institute Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Sweden</json:string><json:string>E-mail: lars.sennerby@biomaterials.gu.se</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Peter Andersson DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;</json:string><json:string>private practice, Feltre, Italy;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Damiano Verrocchi DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Rauno Viinamäki DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>private practice, Feltre, Italy;</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>clinical follow‐up</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>ental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>radiography</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>resonance frequency analysis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>two‐stage technique</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID273</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-K04T13S5-L</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: The Neoss implant system has been available since 2004. Few studies documenting the clinical performance of this implant are available.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.417</score><pdfWordCount>4165</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>25869</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>21</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>147</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>One‐Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and RFA Study</title><pmid><json:string>20345985</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>313</first><last>320</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>2004</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Neoss Ltd, Harrogate, UK</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Peter Andersson</json:string><json:string>Damiano Verrocchi</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Verona</json:string><json:string>Jokstad</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>France</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Glauser et al.</json:string><json:string>Bogaerde et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-K04T13S5-L</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00273.x</json:string></doi><id>7E54EAF697D15A4979DF3597115FE32EC23C7008</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7E54EAF697D15A4979DF3597115FE32EC23C7008/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7E54EAF697D15A4979DF3597115FE32EC23C7008/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7E54EAF697D15A4979DF3597115FE32EC23C7008/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">One‐Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and RFA Study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">One‐Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and RFA Study</title><title level="a" type="short">Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Lars</forename><surname>Sennerby</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>private practice, Feltre, Italy;<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Department of Biomaterials, Institute Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr. Lars Sennerby, Department Biomaterials, Institute Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, PO Box 412, SE 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden; e‐mail: lars.sennerby@biomaterials.gu.se</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Peter</forename><surname>Andersson</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>private practice, Feltre, Italy;<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Damiano</forename><surname>Verrocchi</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Rauno</forename><surname>Viinamäki</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>private practice, Feltre, Italy;<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">7E54EAF697D15A4979DF3597115FE32EC23C7008</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-K04T13S5-L</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00273.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID273</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID273.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="313">313</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="320">320</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi> The Neoss implant system has been available since 2004. Few studies documenting the clinical performance of this implant are available.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> To study the stability and clinical/radiographic outcomes of Neoss implants 1 year of loading when using a two‐stage protocol.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Ninety (90) consecutive patients scheduled for implant treatment using a two‐stage procedure were enrolled in a prospective follow‐up study. A total of 218 implants (Neoss System, Bimodal surface, Neoss Ltd, Harrogate, UK) in diameters of 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 mm and in lengths from 7 to 15 mm were placed to support 29 single tooth replacements, 53 partial bridges, 5 full bridges, and 10 overdentures in both jaws. Abutment connection was made after a healing period of 3–4 months. The patients were followed during 1 year of loading with clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis (Osstell Mentor™, Osstell AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) examinations. Prostheses were removed at the annual check‐up for individual testing of implant stability.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> Three implant failures were experienced, giving a survival rate of 98.6% after 1 year. A mean bone loss of 0.6 mm (SD 0.8) was observed after 1 year. There was a significant inverse correlation between implant diameter and marginal bone loss (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .003). The mean implant stability quotient levels were 73.7 (SD 7.6), 74.4 (SD 6.4), and 76.7 (SD 5.2) at placement, abutment connection, and first annual check‐up, respectively. The stability had increased significantly from placement to 1 year (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .001) and from abutment to 1 year (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .0001). Implant stability was higher in the mandible than in the maxilla at all time points. There was a significant correlation between bone quality and stability at placement (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .0001) and abutment connection (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .001) but not after 1 year.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions:</hi> The use of Neoss implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of consecutive edentate patients with different needs resulted in predictable clinical and radiographic outcomes after 1 year of loading. Implant stability measurements revealed a favorable bone tissue reaction to the implants.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">clinical follow‐up</term><term xml:id="k2">ental implants</term><term xml:id="k3">radiography</term><term xml:id="k4">resonance frequency analysis</term><term xml:id="k5">two‐stage technique</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7E54EAF697D15A4979DF3597115FE32EC23C7008/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06103"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-06">June 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="1" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00273.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID273"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-03-12"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.5 mode:FullText" date="2012-06-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-06-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="313">313</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="320">320</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr. Lars Sennerby, Department Biomaterials, Institute Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, PO Box 412, SE 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden; e‐mail: <email>lars.sennerby@biomaterials.gu.se</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID273.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="6"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="33"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="4888"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">One‐Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and RFA Study</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2010</title><title type="short">Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2 #a3" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Lars</givenNames><familyName>Sennerby</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2"><personName><givenNames>Peter</givenNames><familyName>Andersson</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Damiano</givenNames><familyName>Verrocchi</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Rauno</givenNames><familyName>Viinamäki</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>private practice, Feltre, Italy;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Biomaterials, Institute Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">clinical follow‐up</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">ental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">radiography</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">resonance frequency analysis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">two‐stage technique</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background:</b> The Neoss implant system has been available since 2004. Few studies documenting the clinical performance of this implant are available.</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To study the stability and clinical/radiographic outcomes of Neoss implants 1 year of loading when using a two‐stage protocol.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Ninety (90) consecutive patients scheduled for implant treatment using a two‐stage procedure were enrolled in a prospective follow‐up study. A total of 218 implants (Neoss System, Bimodal surface, Neoss Ltd, Harrogate, UK) in diameters of 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 mm and in lengths from 7 to 15 mm were placed to support 29 single tooth replacements, 53 partial bridges, 5 full bridges, and 10 overdentures in both jaws. Abutment connection was made after a healing period of 3–4 months. The patients were followed during 1 year of loading with clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis (Osstell Mentor™, Osstell AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) examinations. Prostheses were removed at the annual check‐up for individual testing of implant stability.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Three implant failures were experienced, giving a survival rate of 98.6% after 1 year. A mean bone loss of 0.6 mm (SD 0.8) was observed after 1 year. There was a significant inverse correlation between implant diameter and marginal bone loss (<i>p</i> < .003). The mean implant stability quotient levels were 73.7 (SD 7.6), 74.4 (SD 6.4), and 76.7 (SD 5.2) at placement, abutment connection, and first annual check‐up, respectively. The stability had increased significantly from placement to 1 year (<i>p</i> < .001) and from abutment to 1 year (<i>p</i> < .0001). Implant stability was higher in the mandible than in the maxilla at all time points. There was a significant correlation between bone quality and stability at placement (<i>p</i> < .0001) and abutment connection (<i>p</i> < .001) but not after 1 year.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The use of Neoss implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of consecutive edentate patients with different needs resulted in predictable clinical and radiographic outcomes after 1 year of loading. Implant stability measurements revealed a favorable bone tissue reaction to the implants.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>One‐Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and RFA Study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>One‐Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and RFA Study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lars</namePart><namePart type="family">Sennerby</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;</affiliation><affiliation>private practice, Feltre, Italy;</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Biomaterials, Institute Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: lars.sennerby@biomaterials.gu.se</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Peter</namePart><namePart type="family">Andersson</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;</affiliation><affiliation>private practice, Feltre, Italy;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Damiano</namePart><namePart type="family">Verrocchi</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Private practice, Fiera di Primiero, Italy;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rauno</namePart><namePart type="family">Viinamäki</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>private practice, Feltre, Italy;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-06</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">4</extent><extent unit="tables">6</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">33</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">4888</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: The Neoss implant system has been available since 2004. Few studies documenting the clinical performance of this implant are available.</abstract><abstract>Purpose: To study the stability and clinical/radiographic outcomes of Neoss implants 1 year of loading when using a two‐stage protocol.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Ninety (90) consecutive patients scheduled for implant treatment using a two‐stage procedure were enrolled in a prospective follow‐up study. A total of 218 implants (Neoss System, Bimodal surface, Neoss Ltd, Harrogate, UK) in diameters of 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 mm and in lengths from 7 to 15 mm were placed to support 29 single tooth replacements, 53 partial bridges, 5 full bridges, and 10 overdentures in both jaws. Abutment connection was made after a healing period of 3–4 months. The patients were followed during 1 year of loading with clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis (Osstell Mentor™, Osstell AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) examinations. Prostheses were removed at the annual check‐up for individual testing of implant stability.</abstract><abstract>Results: Three implant failures were experienced, giving a survival rate of 98.6% after 1 year. A mean bone loss of 0.6 mm (SD 0.8) was observed after 1 year. There was a significant inverse correlation between implant diameter and marginal bone loss (p < .003). The mean implant stability quotient levels were 73.7 (SD 7.6), 74.4 (SD 6.4), and 76.7 (SD 5.2) at placement, abutment connection, and first annual check‐up, respectively. The stability had increased significantly from placement to 1 year (p < .001) and from abutment to 1 year (p < .0001). Implant stability was higher in the mandible than in the maxilla at all time points. There was a significant correlation between bone quality and stability at placement (p < .0001) and abutment connection (p < .001) but not after 1 year.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: The use of Neoss implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of consecutive edentate patients with different needs resulted in predictable clinical and radiographic outcomes after 1 year of loading. Implant stability measurements revealed a favorable bone tissue reaction to the implants.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>clinical follow‐up</topic><topic>ental implants</topic><topic>radiography</topic><topic>resonance frequency analysis</topic><topic>two‐stage technique</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>313</start><end>320</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">7E54EAF697D15A4979DF3597115FE32EC23C7008</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-K04T13S5-L</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00273.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID273</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7E54EAF697D15A4979DF3597115FE32EC23C7008/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003E55 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003E55 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:7E54EAF697D15A4979DF3597115FE32EC23C7008
|texte= One‐Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and RFA Study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |