Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes around Porous Oxide‐Coated Implants (TiUnite™)
Identifieur interne : 003D15 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003D14; suivant : 003D16Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes around Porous Oxide‐Coated Implants (TiUnite™)
Auteurs : William Becker ; Philippe Hujoel ; Burton E. Becker ; Peter WohrleSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2013-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Active patient, Apless surgery, Average crestal bone loss, Barrier membranes, Becker, Bone level changes, Bone level measures, Bone levels, Bone loss, Bone quality, Bone shape, Bone type, Branemark, Censoring date, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical professor, Cortical bone, Cortical bone cancellous core, Crestal, Crestal bone loss, Crestal bone loss evaluation, Dent, Dental implants, Edentulous, Edentulous mandibles, Failure rates, Graduate periodontics, Healing abutment, Immediate implant placement, Immediate placement, Implant, Implant diameter, Implant failure, Implant length, Implant placement, Implant surface, Implant survival, Last visit, Mandibular, Mandibular implants, Marginal bone changes, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Marginal bone resorption, Maxillary, Multicenter study, Nobel biocare, Nonfailed implants, Nonfailing implants, Odds ratio, Osseointegrated implants, Porous implants, Present study, Private practice, Proc genmod, Prospective multicenter study, Prospective study, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic measurements, Range years, Relat, Retrospective study, Second stage, Soft bone, Standard error, Surgical method, Survival curves, Survival rate, Survival rates, Tiunite, Tiunite implants, Unknown reasons, William becker.
- Teeft :
- Active patient, Apless surgery, Average crestal bone loss, Barrier membranes, Becker, Bone level changes, Bone level measures, Bone levels, Bone loss, Bone quality, Bone shape, Bone type, Branemark, Censoring date, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical professor, Cortical bone, Cortical bone cancellous core, Crestal, Crestal bone loss, Crestal bone loss evaluation, Dent, Dental implants, Edentulous, Edentulous mandibles, Failure rates, Graduate periodontics, Healing abutment, Immediate implant placement, Immediate placement, Implant, Implant diameter, Implant failure, Implant length, Implant placement, Implant surface, Implant survival, Last visit, Mandibular, Mandibular implants, Marginal bone changes, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Marginal bone resorption, Maxillary, Multicenter study, Nobel biocare, Nonfailed implants, Nonfailing implants, Odds ratio, Osseointegrated implants, Porous implants, Present study, Private practice, Proc genmod, Prospective multicenter study, Prospective study, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic measurements, Range years, Relat, Retrospective study, Second stage, Soft bone, Standard error, Surgical method, Survival curves, Survival rate, Survival rates, Tiunite, Tiunite implants, Unknown reasons, William becker.
Abstract
This prospective study evaluated implant survival rates and crestal bone changes for porous oxide‐coated (TiUnite, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), parallel‐walled implants.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12106
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:7BB23D932BEF067DE29172FB7B41D66F83F51BA1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes around Porous Oxide‐Coated Implants (TiUnite™)</title><author><name sortKey="Becker, William" sort="Becker, William" uniqKey="Becker W" first="William" last="Becker">William Becker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Tucson, AZ, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Graduate Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: branebill@comcast.net</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hujoel, Philippe" sort="Hujoel, Philippe" uniqKey="Hujoel P" first="Philippe" last="Hujoel">Philippe Hujoel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, UW, WA, Seattle, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Becker, Burton E" sort="Becker, Burton E" uniqKey="Becker B" first="Burton E." last="Becker">Burton E. Becker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, AZ, Tucson, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wohrle, Peter" sort="Wohrle, Peter" uniqKey="Wohrle P" first="Peter" last="Wohrle">Peter Wohrle</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice, CA, Newport Beach, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7BB23D932BEF067DE29172FB7B41D66F83F51BA1</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/cid.12106</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7BB23D932BEF067DE29172FB7B41D66F83F51BA1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003D15</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003D15</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes around Porous Oxide‐Coated Implants (<hi rend="fc">T</hi>i<hi rend="fc">U</hi>nite™)</title><author><name sortKey="Becker, William" sort="Becker, William" uniqKey="Becker W" first="William" last="Becker">William Becker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, Tucson, AZ, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Graduate Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: branebill@comcast.net</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hujoel, Philippe" sort="Hujoel, Philippe" uniqKey="Hujoel P" first="Philippe" last="Hujoel">Philippe Hujoel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, UW, WA, Seattle, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Becker, Burton E" sort="Becker, Burton E" uniqKey="Becker B" first="Burton E." last="Becker">Burton E. Becker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, AZ, Tucson, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wohrle, Peter" sort="Wohrle, Peter" uniqKey="Wohrle P" first="Peter" last="Wohrle">Peter Wohrle</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>private practice, CA, Newport Beach, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="654">654</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="660">660</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-10">2013-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Active patient</term><term>Apless surgery</term><term>Average crestal bone loss</term><term>Barrier membranes</term><term>Becker</term><term>Bone level changes</term><term>Bone level measures</term><term>Bone levels</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone shape</term><term>Bone type</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Censoring date</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical professor</term><term>Cortical bone</term><term>Cortical bone cancellous core</term><term>Crestal</term><term>Crestal bone loss</term><term>Crestal bone loss evaluation</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandibles</term><term>Failure rates</term><term>Graduate periodontics</term><term>Healing abutment</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Immediate placement</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Last visit</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular implants</term><term>Marginal bone changes</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Marginal bone resorption</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Nonfailed implants</term><term>Nonfailing implants</term><term>Odds ratio</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Porous implants</term><term>Present study</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Proc genmod</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic measurements</term><term>Range years</term><term>Relat</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Second stage</term><term>Soft bone</term><term>Standard error</term><term>Surgical method</term><term>Survival curves</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Tiunite</term><term>Tiunite implants</term><term>Unknown reasons</term><term>William becker</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Active patient</term><term>Apless surgery</term><term>Average crestal bone loss</term><term>Barrier membranes</term><term>Becker</term><term>Bone level changes</term><term>Bone level measures</term><term>Bone levels</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone shape</term><term>Bone type</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Censoring date</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical professor</term><term>Cortical bone</term><term>Cortical bone cancellous core</term><term>Crestal</term><term>Crestal bone loss</term><term>Crestal bone loss evaluation</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandibles</term><term>Failure rates</term><term>Graduate periodontics</term><term>Healing abutment</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Immediate placement</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Last visit</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular implants</term><term>Marginal bone changes</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Marginal bone resorption</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Nonfailed implants</term><term>Nonfailing implants</term><term>Odds ratio</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Porous implants</term><term>Present study</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Proc genmod</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic measurements</term><term>Range years</term><term>Relat</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Second stage</term><term>Soft bone</term><term>Standard error</term><term>Surgical method</term><term>Survival curves</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Tiunite</term><term>Tiunite implants</term><term>Unknown reasons</term><term>William becker</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">This prospective study evaluated implant survival rates and crestal bone changes for porous oxide‐coated (TiUnite, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), parallel‐walled implants.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>tiunite</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>crestal</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>becker</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>bone quality</json:string><json:string>survival rates</json:string><json:string>relat</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>second stage</json:string><json:string>bone level changes</json:string><json:string>tiunite implants</json:string><json:string>surgical method</json:string><json:string>nonfailing implants</json:string><json:string>porous implants</json:string><json:string>average crestal bone loss</json:string><json:string>implant length</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>private practice</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>implant diameter</json:string><json:string>standard error</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>healing abutment</json:string><json:string>last visit</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>bone shape</json:string><json:string>cortical bone</json:string><json:string>proc genmod</json:string><json:string>crestal bone loss</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>immediate implant placement</json:string><json:string>censoring date</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>bone type</json:string><json:string>failure rates</json:string><json:string>william becker</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>survival curves</json:string><json:string>clinical professor</json:string><json:string>range years</json:string><json:string>graduate periodontics</json:string><json:string>active patient</json:string><json:string>bone level measures</json:string><json:string>cortical bone cancellous core</json:string><json:string>unknown reasons</json:string><json:string>barrier membranes</json:string><json:string>crestal bone loss evaluation</json:string><json:string>radiographic measurements</json:string><json:string>odds ratio</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>marginal bone changes</json:string><json:string>implant survival</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>nonfailed implants</json:string><json:string>implant surface</json:string><json:string>multicenter study</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>soft bone</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>bone levels</json:string><json:string>immediate placement</json:string><json:string>apless surgery</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>mandibular implants</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandibles</json:string><json:string>marginal bone resorption</json:string><json:string>prospective multicenter study</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>William Becker DDS, MSD</name><affiliations><json:string>Private practice, Tucson, AZ, USA</json:string><json:string>University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA</json:string><json:string>University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA</json:string><json:string>Department of Graduate Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA</json:string><json:string>E-mail: branebill@comcast.net</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Philippe Hujoel DDS, MS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, UW, WA, Seattle, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Burton E. Becker DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Private practice, AZ, Tucson, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Peter Wohrle DMD, MMSc</name><affiliations><json:string>private practice, CA, Newport Beach, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>survival rate</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID12106</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-1G8MH0FM-5</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This prospective study evaluated implant survival rates and crestal bone changes for porous oxide‐coated (TiUnite, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), parallel‐walled implants.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>22</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>179</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount><score>5.363</score><pdfWordCount>3099</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>20876</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes around Porous Oxide‐Coated Implants (TiUnite™)</title><pmid><json:string>23901884</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>654</first><last>660</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2009</json:string><json:string>1986</json:string><json:string>1999</json:string><json:string>2013-06-07</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, UW, Seattle, WA, USA</json:string><json:string>Department of Graduate Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA</json:string><json:string>University of Washington</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Branemark</json:string><json:string>Philippe Hujoel</json:string><json:string>Peter Wohrle</json:string><json:string>Jemt</json:string><json:string>William Becker</json:string><json:string>Friberg</json:string><json:string>Burton E. Becker</json:string><json:string>Adell</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Helsinki</json:string><json:string>Seattle</json:string><json:string>AZ</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>CA</json:string><json:string>WA</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Long Beach</json:string><json:string>Tucson</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-1G8MH0FM-5</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/cid.12106</json:string></doi><id>7BB23D932BEF067DE29172FB7B41D66F83F51BA1</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7BB23D932BEF067DE29172FB7B41D66F83F51BA1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7BB23D932BEF067DE29172FB7B41D66F83F51BA1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7BB23D932BEF067DE29172FB7B41D66F83F51BA1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes around Porous Oxide‐Coated Implants (<hi rend="fc">T</hi>i<hi rend="fc">U</hi>nite™)</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes around Porous Oxide‐Coated Implants (<hi rend="fc">T</hi>i<hi rend="fc">U</hi>nite™)</title><title level="a" type="short">Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">William</forename><surname>Becker</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSD</roleName></persName><affiliation><orgName>Private practice</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Tucson</settlement><region>AZ</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation><orgName>University of Southern California</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Los Angeles</settlement><region>CA</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation><orgName>University of Washington</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Seattle</settlement><region>WA</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation><orgName>Department of Graduate Periodontics</orgName><orgName>University of Washington</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Seattle, WA</settlement><country>USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests: Dr. William Becker, 801 N. Wilmot, B2, Tucson, AZ 85711, USA; e‐mail: branebill@comcast.net</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Philippe</forename><surname>Hujoel</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Oral Health Sciences</orgName><orgName>School of Dentistry</orgName><orgName>UW</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Seattle</settlement><region>WA</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Burton E.</forename><surname>Becker</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation><orgName>Private practice</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Tucson</settlement><region>AZ</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Peter</forename><surname>Wohrle</surname><roleName type="degree">DMD, MMSc</roleName></persName><affiliation><orgName>private practice</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Newport Beach</settlement><region>CA</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">7BB23D932BEF067DE29172FB7B41D66F83F51BA1</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-1G8MH0FM-5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/cid.12106</idno><idno type="unit">CID12106</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID12106.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2013.15.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="654">654</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="660">660</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main"><head>Abstract</head>
Purpose
<p>This prospective study evaluated implant survival rates and crestal bone changes for porous oxide‐coated (<hi rend="fc">T</hi>i<hi rend="fc">U</hi>nite, <hi rend="fc">N</hi>obel <hi rend="fc">B</hi>iocare <hi rend="fc">AB</hi>, <hi rend="fc">G</hi>othenburg, <hi rend="fc">S</hi>weden), parallel‐walled implants.</p>
Materials and Methods
<p>All patients receiving <hi rend="fc">T</hi>i<hi rend="fc">U</hi>nite (porous oxide‐surfaced implants [<hi rend="fc">POS</hi>]) implants were entered into a database (<hi rend="fc">T</hi>riton <hi rend="fc">T</hi>racking <hi rend="fc">S</hi>ystem) starting <hi rend="fc">F</hi>ebruary 1999. Survival rates were calculated from the date of implant placement and related to surgical method of placement (two‐stage buried, flapless, immediate placement, immediate placement flapless, one stage), bone quality, and implant characteristics. Failed and nonfailed implants were compared with respect to changes in mean proximal bone levels and the presence of radiolucent areas around the implant apex (shadows).</p>
Results
<p>Four hundred nine patients received 817 porous oxide‐coated implants, of which 38 failed. Using the last office visit as the censoring date, the cumulative survival date was 93%. The failure rate was independent of bone quality or quantity; implant diameter or length; and surgical method. For the 102 surviving implants, there was no significant change in the average crestal bone loss (+0.13 mm with a standard error, 0.17). For the 17 failing implants, the average crestal bone loss was −4.14 mm (standard error, 0.55). This difference between bone levels of failing and nonfailing implants was highly significant (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .0001). There was no difference in the prevalence of radiographic shadows around failing and nonfailing implants at time of placement (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .16).</p>
Conclusion
<p>Results from this prospective clinical study indicate that 7% of <hi rend="fc">T</hi>i<hi rend="fc">U</hi>nite surfaced implants failed for unknown reasons. Failing implants were characterized by significant bone loss but not by the presence of shadows.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="cid12106-kwd-0001">bone</term><term xml:id="cid12106-kwd-0002">implant</term><term xml:id="cid12106-kwd-0003">survival rate</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Article</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7BB23D932BEF067DE29172FB7B41D66F83F51BA1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body" wicri:toSee="Element #text"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="cid12106" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title type="short">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10105"><doi>10.1111/cid.2013.15.issue-5</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="15" type="journalVolume">15</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-10">October 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" status="forIssue" type="article" position="40"><doi>10.1111/cid.12106</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID12106"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="7" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title><title type="articleCategory">Article</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event agent="bestset" date="2013-06-07" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2013-08-01"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-08-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-10-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-02"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">654</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">660</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Reprint requests: Dr. William Becker, 801 N. Wilmot, B2, Tucson, AZ 85711, USA; e‐mail: <email>branebill@comcast.net</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID12106.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="short">Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes</title><title type="main">Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes around Porous Oxide‐Coated Implants (<fc>T</fc>i<fc>U</fc>nite™)</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#cid12106-aff-0001 #cid12106-aff-0002 #cid12106-aff-0003 #cid12106-aff-0004" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="cid12106-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>William</givenNames><familyName>Becker</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSD</degrees></personName><jobTitle>Clinical professor, Graduate periodontics, Affiliate clinical professor</jobTitle></creator><creator affiliationRef="#cid12106-aff-0005" creatorRole="author" xml:id="cid12106-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Philippe</givenNames><familyName>Hujoel</familyName><degrees>DDS, MS, PhD</degrees></personName><jobTitle>Professor</jobTitle></creator><creator affiliationRef="#cid12106-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="cid12106-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Burton E.</givenNames><familyName>Becker</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#cid12106-aff-0007" creatorRole="author" xml:id="cid12106-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>Peter</givenNames><familyName>Wohrle</familyName><degrees>DMD, MMSc</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="US" xml:id="cid12106-aff-0001"><orgName>Private practice</orgName><address><city>Tucson</city><countryPart>AZ</countryPart><country>USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="US" xml:id="cid12106-aff-0002"><orgName>University of Southern California</orgName><address><city>Los Angeles</city><countryPart>CA</countryPart><country>USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="US" xml:id="cid12106-aff-0003"><orgName>University of Washington</orgName><address><city>Seattle</city><countryPart>WA</countryPart><country>USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="cid12106-aff-0004"><orgDiv>Department of Graduate Periodontics</orgDiv><orgName>University of Washington</orgName><address><city>Seattle, WA</city><country>USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="US" xml:id="cid12106-aff-0005"><orgDiv>Department of Oral Health Sciences</orgDiv><orgDiv>School of Dentistry</orgDiv><orgName>UW</orgName><address><city>Seattle</city><countryPart>WA</countryPart><country>USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="US" xml:id="cid12106-aff-0007"><orgName>private practice</orgName><address><city>Newport Beach</city><countryPart>CA</countryPart><country>USA</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="cid12106-kwd-0001">bone</keyword><keyword xml:id="cid12106-kwd-0002">implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="cid12106-kwd-0003">survival rate</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="cid12106-sec-0001"><title type="main">Purpose</title><p>This prospective study evaluated implant survival rates and crestal bone changes for porous oxide‐coated (<fc>T</fc>i<fc>U</fc>nite, <fc>N</fc>obel <fc>B</fc>iocare <fc>AB</fc>, <fc>G</fc>othenburg, <fc>S</fc>weden), parallel‐walled implants.</p></section><section xml:id="cid12106-sec-0002"><title type="main">Materials and Methods</title><p>All patients receiving <fc>T</fc>i<fc>U</fc>nite (porous oxide‐surfaced implants [<fc>POS</fc>]) implants were entered into a database (<fc>T</fc>riton <fc>T</fc>racking <fc>S</fc>ystem) starting <fc>F</fc>ebruary 1999. Survival rates were calculated from the date of implant placement and related to surgical method of placement (two‐stage buried, flapless, immediate placement, immediate placement flapless, one stage), bone quality, and implant characteristics. Failed and nonfailed implants were compared with respect to changes in mean proximal bone levels and the presence of radiolucent areas around the implant apex (shadows).</p></section><section xml:id="cid12106-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>Four hundred nine patients received 817 porous oxide‐coated implants, of which 38 failed. Using the last office visit as the censoring date, the cumulative survival date was 93%. The failure rate was independent of bone quality or quantity; implant diameter or length; and surgical method. For the 102 surviving implants, there was no significant change in the average crestal bone loss (+0.13 mm with a standard error, 0.17). For the 17 failing implants, the average crestal bone loss was −4.14 mm (standard error, 0.55). This difference between bone levels of failing and nonfailing implants was highly significant (<i>p</i> < .0001). There was no difference in the prevalence of radiographic shadows around failing and nonfailing implants at time of placement (<i>p</i> < .16).</p></section><section xml:id="cid12106-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusion</title><p>Results from this prospective clinical study indicate that 7% of <fc>T</fc>i<fc>U</fc>nite surfaced implants failed for unknown reasons. Failing implants were characterized by significant bone loss but not by the presence of shadows.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note numbered="no" xml:id="cid12106-note-0001">Conflict of interest: This study was self‐funded by the authors. No commercial interests were involved.</note></noteGroup></header> </component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes around Porous Oxide‐Coated Implants (TiUnite™)</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes around Porous Oxide‐Coated Implants (TiUnite™)</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">William</namePart><namePart type="family">Becker</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSD</namePart><affiliation>Private practice, Tucson, AZ, USA</affiliation><affiliation>University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA</affiliation><affiliation>University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Graduate Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: branebill@comcast.net</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role><description>Clinical professor, Graduate periodontics, Affiliate clinical professor</description></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Philippe</namePart><namePart type="family">Hujoel</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, UW, WA, Seattle, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role><description>Professor</description></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Burton E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Becker</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Private practice, AZ, Tucson, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Peter</namePart><namePart type="family">Wohrle</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DMD, MMSc</namePart><affiliation>private practice, CA, Newport Beach, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-10</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-06-07</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>This prospective study evaluated implant survival rates and crestal bone changes for porous oxide‐coated (TiUnite, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), parallel‐walled implants.</abstract><abstract>All patients receiving TiUnite (porous oxide‐surfaced implants [POS]) implants were entered into a database (Triton Tracking System) starting February 1999. Survival rates were calculated from the date of implant placement and related to surgical method of placement (two‐stage buried, flapless, immediate placement, immediate placement flapless, one stage), bone quality, and implant characteristics. Failed and nonfailed implants were compared with respect to changes in mean proximal bone levels and the presence of radiolucent areas around the implant apex (shadows).</abstract><abstract>Four hundred nine patients received 817 porous oxide‐coated implants, of which 38 failed. Using the last office visit as the censoring date, the cumulative survival date was 93%. The failure rate was independent of bone quality or quantity; implant diameter or length; and surgical method. For the 102 surviving implants, there was no significant change in the average crestal bone loss (+0.13 mm with a standard error, 0.17). For the 17 failing implants, the average crestal bone loss was −4.14 mm (standard error, 0.55). This difference between bone levels of failing and nonfailing implants was highly significant (p < .0001). There was no difference in the prevalence of radiographic shadows around failing and nonfailing implants at time of placement (p < .16).</abstract><abstract>Results from this prospective clinical study indicate that 7% of TiUnite surfaced implants failed for unknown reasons. Failing implants were characterized by significant bone loss but not by the presence of shadows.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone</topic><topic>implant</topic><topic>survival rate</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>15</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>654</start><end>660</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">7BB23D932BEF067DE29172FB7B41D66F83F51BA1</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-1G8MH0FM-5</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/cid.12106</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID12106</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7BB23D932BEF067DE29172FB7B41D66F83F51BA1/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003D15 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003D15 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:7BB23D932BEF067DE29172FB7B41D66F83F51BA1
|texte= Survival Rates and Bone Level Changes around Porous Oxide‐Coated Implants (TiUnite™)
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |