A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year
Identifieur interne : 003C52 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003C51; suivant : 003C53A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year
Auteurs : Niklaus P. Lang ; Lui Pun ; Ka Yee Lau ; Ka Yan Li ; May Cm WongSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2012-02.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Aesthetic complications, Aesthetic outcomes, Annual failure rate, Annual failure rates, Antibiotic, Apical, Autogenous, Barone, Becker, Berglundh, Bianchi, Biotype, Bogaerde, Bone loss, Botticelli, Branemark, Buccal, Cangini, Canullo, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical trial, Cmcs, Cohort, Cordaro, Cornelini, Covani, Crespi, Dental implants, Dentistry, Denture, Early loading, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Esposito, Exclusion, Exclusion criteria, Extraction, Extraction sockets, Fabbro, Failure rate, Ferrara, Fpd, Fresh extraction sockets, Fugazzotto, Gherlone, Gingival, Goldstein, Graft, Hammerle, Heterogeneity, Huys, Immediate implant, Immediate implant group, Immediate implant placement, Immediate implants, Immediate loading, Immediate restoration, Impl, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant placement, Implantology, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, John wiley sons lang, Juodzbalys, Lang, Lindeboom, Mandible, Mandibular, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillofacial, Mesial, Mesial papilla, Mijiritsky, Molar, Mucosal, Mucositis, Multicenter, Observation period, Occlusal, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofacial implants, Other types, Overdentures, Papilla, Perio, Periodontal, Periodontics, Periodontology, Poisson, Poisson regression, Prosp, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Provisionalization, Radiographic, Randomized, Rangert, Ribeiro, Rouck, Sample size, Separate report, Siciliano, Siegenthaler, Single crowns, Socket, Soft tissue changes, Soft tissues, Straumann, Summary estimate, Survival rate, Systematic review, Technical complications, Tiunite, Tooth extraction, Total implant exposure time, Transalveolar, Unknown number, Unknown survival rate, Unknown type, Vanden, Vanden bogaerde.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Aesthetic complications, Aesthetic outcomes, Annual failure rate, Annual failure rates, Antibiotic, Apical, Autogenous, Barone, Becker, Berglundh, Bianchi, Biotype, Bogaerde, Bone loss, Botticelli, Branemark, Buccal, Cangini, Canullo, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical trial, Cmcs, Cohort, Cordaro, Cornelini, Covani, Crespi, Dental implants, Dentistry, Denture, Early loading, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Esposito, Exclusion, Exclusion criteria, Extraction, Extraction sockets, Fabbro, Failure rate, Ferrara, Fpd, Fresh extraction sockets, Fugazzotto, Gherlone, Gingival, Goldstein, Graft, Hammerle, Heterogeneity, Huys, Immediate implant, Immediate implant group, Immediate implant placement, Immediate implants, Immediate loading, Immediate restoration, Impl, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant placement, Implantology, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, John wiley sons lang, Juodzbalys, Lang, Lindeboom, Mandible, Mandibular, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillofacial, Mesial, Mesial papilla, Mijiritsky, Molar, Mucosal, Mucositis, Multicenter, Observation period, Occlusal, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofacial implants, Other types, Overdentures, Papilla, Perio, Periodontal, Periodontics, Periodontology, Poisson, Poisson regression, Prosp, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Provisionalization, Radiographic, Randomized, Rangert, Ribeiro, Rouck, Sample size, Separate report, Siciliano, Siegenthaler, Single crowns, Socket, Soft tissue changes, Soft tissues, Straumann, Summary estimate, Survival rate, Systematic review, Technical complications, Tiunite, Tooth extraction, Total implant exposure time, Transalveolar, Unknown number, Unknown survival rate, Unknown type, Vanden, Vanden bogaerde.
Abstract
Type I immediate implant placement has gained popularity because it may reduce treatment time, number of surgeries and post‐extraction bone loss. However, this is potentially challenged by inadequate keratinized mucosa for flap adaptation and difficulties in achieving primary stability. Moreover, it has been proven that post‐extraction bone loss is an inevitable biological process, which affects treatment outcomes.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:7A763A06B75DB8CC346251F3523A436CA54BE30DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year</title><author><name sortKey="Lang, Niklaus P" sort="Lang, Niklaus P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="Niklaus P." last="Lang">Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pun, Lui" sort="Pun, Lui" uniqKey="Pun L" first="Lui" last="Pun">Lui Pun</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lau, Ka Yee" sort="Lau, Ka Yee" uniqKey="Lau K" first="Ka Yee" last="Lau">Ka Yee Lau</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The University of Hong KongFaculty of DentistryPrince Philip Dental HospitalHong KongSARChinaTel.: +85 294 876 677e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: iriskylau@hotmail.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Li, Ka Yan" sort="Li, Ka Yan" uniqKey="Li K" first="Ka Yan" last="Li">Ka Yan Li</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wong, May Cm" sort="Wong, May Cm" uniqKey="Wong M" first="May Cm" last="Wong">May Cm Wong</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7A763A06B75DB8CC346251F3523A436CA54BE30D</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7A763A06B75DB8CC346251F3523A436CA54BE30D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003C52</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003C52</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year</title><author><name sortKey="Lang, Niklaus P" sort="Lang, Niklaus P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="Niklaus P." last="Lang">Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pun, Lui" sort="Pun, Lui" uniqKey="Pun L" first="Lui" last="Pun">Lui Pun</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lau, Ka Yee" sort="Lau, Ka Yee" uniqKey="Lau K" first="Ka Yee" last="Lau">Ka Yee Lau</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The University of Hong KongFaculty of DentistryPrince Philip Dental HospitalHong KongSARChinaTel.: +85 294 876 677e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: iriskylau@hotmail.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Li, Ka Yan" sort="Li, Ka Yan" uniqKey="Li K" first="Ka Yan" last="Li">Ka Yan Li</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wong, May Cm" sort="Wong, May Cm" uniqKey="Wong M" first="May Cm" last="Wong">May Cm Wong</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="sub">Osteology Foundation, 6th Expert Meeting</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="39">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="66">66</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">28</biblScope><date type="published" when="2012-02">2012-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Aesthetic complications</term><term>Aesthetic outcomes</term><term>Annual failure rate</term><term>Annual failure rates</term><term>Antibiotic</term><term>Apical</term><term>Autogenous</term><term>Barone</term><term>Becker</term><term>Berglundh</term><term>Bianchi</term><term>Biotype</term><term>Bogaerde</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Botticelli</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Buccal</term><term>Cangini</term><term>Canullo</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Cmcs</term><term>Cohort</term><term>Cordaro</term><term>Cornelini</term><term>Covani</term><term>Crespi</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Esposito</term><term>Exclusion</term><term>Exclusion criteria</term><term>Extraction</term><term>Extraction sockets</term><term>Fabbro</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>Ferrara</term><term>Fpd</term><term>Fresh extraction sockets</term><term>Fugazzotto</term><term>Gherlone</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Goldstein</term><term>Graft</term><term>Hammerle</term><term>Heterogeneity</term><term>Huys</term><term>Immediate implant</term><term>Immediate implant group</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Immediate implants</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immediate restoration</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implantology</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons lang</term><term>Juodzbalys</term><term>Lang</term><term>Lindeboom</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Mesial</term><term>Mesial papilla</term><term>Mijiritsky</term><term>Molar</term><term>Mucosal</term><term>Mucositis</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Other types</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Papilla</term><term>Perio</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontics</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Poisson</term><term>Poisson regression</term><term>Prosp</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Provisionalization</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Rangert</term><term>Ribeiro</term><term>Rouck</term><term>Sample size</term><term>Separate report</term><term>Siciliano</term><term>Siegenthaler</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Socket</term><term>Soft tissue changes</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Straumann</term><term>Summary estimate</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Technical complications</term><term>Tiunite</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Total implant exposure time</term><term>Transalveolar</term><term>Unknown number</term><term>Unknown survival rate</term><term>Unknown type</term><term>Vanden</term><term>Vanden bogaerde</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Aesthetic complications</term><term>Aesthetic outcomes</term><term>Annual failure rate</term><term>Annual failure rates</term><term>Antibiotic</term><term>Apical</term><term>Autogenous</term><term>Barone</term><term>Becker</term><term>Berglundh</term><term>Bianchi</term><term>Biotype</term><term>Bogaerde</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Botticelli</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Buccal</term><term>Cangini</term><term>Canullo</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Cmcs</term><term>Cohort</term><term>Cordaro</term><term>Cornelini</term><term>Covani</term><term>Crespi</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Esposito</term><term>Exclusion</term><term>Exclusion criteria</term><term>Extraction</term><term>Extraction sockets</term><term>Fabbro</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>Ferrara</term><term>Fpd</term><term>Fresh extraction sockets</term><term>Fugazzotto</term><term>Gherlone</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Goldstein</term><term>Graft</term><term>Hammerle</term><term>Heterogeneity</term><term>Huys</term><term>Immediate implant</term><term>Immediate implant group</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Immediate implants</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Immediate restoration</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implantology</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons lang</term><term>Juodzbalys</term><term>Lang</term><term>Lindeboom</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Mesial</term><term>Mesial papilla</term><term>Mijiritsky</term><term>Molar</term><term>Mucosal</term><term>Mucositis</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Other types</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Papilla</term><term>Perio</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontics</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Poisson</term><term>Poisson regression</term><term>Prosp</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Provisionalization</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Rangert</term><term>Ribeiro</term><term>Rouck</term><term>Sample size</term><term>Separate report</term><term>Siciliano</term><term>Siegenthaler</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Socket</term><term>Soft tissue changes</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Straumann</term><term>Summary estimate</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Technical complications</term><term>Tiunite</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Total implant exposure time</term><term>Transalveolar</term><term>Unknown number</term><term>Unknown survival rate</term><term>Unknown type</term><term>Vanden</term><term>Vanden bogaerde</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Type I immediate implant placement has gained popularity because it may reduce treatment time, number of surgeries and post‐extraction bone loss. However, this is potentially challenged by inadequate keratinized mucosa for flap adaptation and difficulties in achieving primary stability. Moreover, it has been proven that post‐extraction bone loss is an inevitable biological process, which affects treatment outcomes.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>immediate implants</json:string><json:string>exclusion criteria</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>papilla</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>crespi</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>prosp</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>cornelini</json:string><json:string>immediate implant placement</json:string><json:string>buccal</json:string><json:string>covani</json:string><json:string>rouck</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>lang</json:string><json:string>botticelli</json:string><json:string>becker</json:string><json:string>mesial</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>extraction sockets</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>immediate implant</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>single crowns</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>fresh extraction sockets</json:string><json:string>perio</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>randomized</json:string><json:string>multicenter</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>mucosal</json:string><json:string>bianchi</json:string><json:string>antibiotic</json:string><json:string>poisson</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>immediate restoration</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>early loading</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>fugazzotto</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>straumann</json:string><json:string>unknown type</json:string><json:string>biotype</json:string><json:string>canullo</json:string><json:string>cmcs</json:string><json:string>summary estimate</json:string><json:string>cordaro</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>annual failure rate</json:string><json:string>unknown number</json:string><json:string>cohort</json:string><json:string>cangini</json:string><json:string>gingival</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>juodzbalys</json:string><json:string>barone</json:string><json:string>observation period</json:string><json:string>siegenthaler</json:string><json:string>heterogeneity</json:string><json:string>autogenous</json:string><json:string>berglundh</json:string><json:string>socket</json:string><json:string>graft</json:string><json:string>bogaerde</json:string><json:string>vanden</json:string><json:string>mijiritsky</json:string><json:string>fabbro</json:string><json:string>vanden bogaerde</json:string><json:string>immediate implant group</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>periodontics</json:string><json:string>other types</json:string><json:string>fpd</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>unknown survival rate</json:string><json:string>separate report</json:string><json:string>mucositis</json:string><json:string>poisson regression</json:string><json:string>annual failure rates</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons lang</json:string><json:string>siciliano</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>esposito</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>occlusal</json:string><json:string>soft tissue changes</json:string><json:string>oral implantology</json:string><json:string>implantology</json:string><json:string>hammerle</json:string><json:string>sample size</json:string><json:string>extraction</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>apical</json:string><json:string>ferrara</json:string><json:string>goldstein</json:string><json:string>mesial papilla</json:string><json:string>tooth extraction</json:string><json:string>rangert</json:string><json:string>tiunite</json:string><json:string>aesthetic outcomes</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>exclusion</json:string><json:string>ribeiro</json:string><json:string>provisionalization</json:string><json:string>gherlone</json:string><json:string>lindeboom</json:string><json:string>soft tissues</json:string><json:string>failure rate</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>transalveolar</json:string><json:string>total implant exposure time</json:string><json:string>huys</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>technical complications</json:string><json:string>aesthetic complications</json:string><json:string>molar</json:string><json:string>tortamano</json:string><json:string>periapical</json:string><json:string>success rates</json:string><json:string>survival rates</json:string><json:string>bragger</json:string><json:string>unknown loading protocol</json:string><json:string>lops</json:string><json:string>distal papilla</json:string><json:string>immediate occlusal loading</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>pjetursson</json:string><json:string>primary stability</json:string><json:string>biological complications</json:string><json:string>preliminary report</json:string><json:string>single dose</json:string><json:string>implants table</json:string><json:string>preliminary results</json:string><json:string>implant years</json:string><json:string>immediate placement</json:string><json:string>posterior mandible</json:string><json:string>esthetic zone</json:string><json:string>multicenter study</json:string><json:string>loading</json:string><json:string>criterion</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>prospective multicenter study</json:string><json:string>hard tissue changes</json:string><json:string>extraction socket</json:string><json:string>oral surgery</json:string><json:string>barrier membranes</json:string><json:string>european journal</json:string><json:string>simultaneous implant placement</json:string><json:string>transalveolar sinus</json:string><json:string>pilot study</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>buccal mucosal level</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>clinical report</json:string><json:string>provisional restorations</json:string><json:string>tissue recession</json:string><json:string>event rates</json:string><json:string>tissue graft</json:string><json:string>cornelini cornelini</json:string><json:string>early function</json:string><json:string>complication</json:string><json:string>sinus</json:string><json:string>implantation</json:string><json:string>protocol</json:string><json:string>unclear</json:string><json:string>connective tissue graft</json:string><json:string>prospective cohort studies</json:string><json:string>high risk</json:string><json:string>marginal bone levels</json:string><json:string>connective tissue</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string><json:string>case series</json:string><json:string>apical displacement</json:string><json:string>anterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>immediate implantation</json:string><json:string>distal papillae</json:string><json:string>immediate function</json:string><json:string>oral medicine</json:string><json:string>oral pathology</json:string><json:string>oral radiology</json:string><json:string>soft tissue alterations</json:string><json:string>conventional loading</json:string><json:string>juodzbalys wang</json:string><json:string>loading protocols</json:string><json:string>prospective studies</json:string><json:string>branemark system tiunite implants</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>complication rates</json:string><json:string>papilla height</json:string><json:string>antibiotic prophylaxis</json:string><json:string>single implants</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>exclusion protocol</json:string><json:string>provisional restoration</json:string><json:string>insertion</json:string><json:string>placement</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Lui Pun</name><affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ka Yee Lau</name><affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</json:string><json:string>The University of Hong KongFaculty of DentistryPrince Philip Dental HospitalHong KongSARChinaTel.: +85 294 876 677e‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: iriskylau@hotmail.com</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ka Yan Li</name><affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>May CM Wong</name><affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>extraction sockets</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>immediate implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant dentistry</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>success</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>survival</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>systematic review</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2372</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-M10X21DR-C</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>reviewArticle</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Type I immediate implant placement has gained popularity because it may reduce treatment time, number of surgeries and post‐extraction bone loss. However, this is potentially challenged by inadequate keratinized mucosa for flap adaptation and difficulties in achieving primary stability. Moreover, it has been proven that post‐extraction bone loss is an inevitable biological process, which affects treatment outcomes.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.684</score><pdfWordCount>18670</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>137196</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>28</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>57</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>418</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year</title><pmid><json:string>22211305</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>23</volume><pages><first>39</first><last>66</last><total>28</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Systematic Reviews</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>2-1-0</json:string><json:string>from January 2000 to December 2010</json:string><json:string>1455</json:string><json:string>2130</json:string><json:string>2003</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string><json:string>from January 1991 to July 2010</json:string><json:string>1991</json:string><json:string>1978</json:string><json:string>5887</json:string><json:string>2011-10-31</json:string></date><geogName><json:string>San</json:string></geogName><orgName><json:string>Stata Corp.</json:string><json:string>Clinical Oral Implants Research International Journal of Oral</json:string><json:string>Restorative Dentistry International Journal</json:string><json:string>Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, China Corresponding</json:string><json:string>The International Journal</json:string><json:string>Osteology Foundation, Luzerne, Switzerland, and the Clinical Research Foundation</json:string><json:string>Ka Yee Lau The University</json:string><json:string>Related Research International Journal of Periodontics</json:string><json:string>Hospital Hong Kong SAR China Tel</json:string><json:string>CRF</json:string><json:string>AstraTech</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Studies</json:string><json:string>Systematic</json:string><json:string>Age</json:string><json:string>Philip Dental</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>M. Lulic</json:string><json:string>Wong Authors</json:string><json:string>Yan Li</json:string><json:string>Niklaus P. Lang</json:string><json:string>Li May</json:string><json:string>W. C. Tan</json:string><json:string>Kong Faculty</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>TX</json:string><json:string>College Station</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Ottawa</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Salvi et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Vidal et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Crespi et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Ferrara et al.</json:string><json:string>Branemark et al. 1969</json:string><json:string>Weber et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Tortamano et al.</json:string><json:string>Renvert & Persson 2009</json:string><json:string>Bogaerde et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Bragger et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Furhauser et al. (2005)</json:string><json:string>Canullo et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Gocen-Rohlig et al.</json:string><json:string>Canullo et al. 2009a</json:string><json:string>Lazzara et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Prosper et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Calvo-Guirado et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Chen et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Crespi et al. (2009a)</json:string><json:string>Cangini and Cornelini 2005</json:string><json:string>Calvo-Guirado et al. (2009)</json:string><json:string>Prosper et al.</json:string><json:string>De Rouck et al. (2008a, 2009)</json:string><json:string>Lops et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Covani et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Crespi et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Goldstein et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Jansen et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Gallucci et al. (2009)</json:string><json:string>Kan et al. 2011</json:string><json:string>Cornelini et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Cornelini et al.</json:string><json:string>Abrahamsson et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Belser et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Hammerle et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Lang et al. (1994)</json:string><json:string>De Rouck et al. 2008a, 2009</json:string><json:string>Siciliano et al.</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Kan et al. 2007a,b</json:string><json:string>Fabbro et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Cordaro et al.</json:string><json:string>Siciliano et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Pjetursson et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Botticelli et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Zitzmann & Berglundh 2008</json:string><json:string>Ribeiro et al.</json:string><json:string>Canullo et al.</json:string><json:string>Hardt et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Becker et al.</json:string><json:string>Covani et al.</json:string><json:string>Carlsson et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Fabbro et al.</json:string><json:string>Fugazzotto et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>De Rouck et al. 2008b</json:string><json:string>Crespi et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Kan et al. (2007a)</json:string><json:string>Wells et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Lineboom et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Barone et al.</json:string><json:string>Lang & Berglundh 2011</json:string><json:string>Lang et al</json:string><json:string>Tomasi et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>De Rouck et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Bianchi et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Lops et al.</json:string><json:string>Vidal et al.</json:string><json:string>Calvo-Guirado et al.</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Jemt 1997</json:string><json:string>Araujo et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Prosper et al. (2010)</json:string><json:string>Botticelli et al. (2008)</json:string><json:string>Botticelli et al.</json:string><json:string>De Rouck et al. 2008a</json:string><json:string>Gokcen-Rohlig et al. (2010)</json:string><json:string>Barone et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson et al. (1986)</json:string><json:string>GokcenRohlig et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>De Rouck et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Kan et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Cordaro et al. (2009)</json:string><json:string>Covani et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Mijiritsky et al.</json:string><json:string>Kirkwood & Sterne 2003b</json:string><json:string>Cornelini et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Goldstein et al.</json:string><json:string>Mengel et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Karoussis et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Kan et al. 2007a</json:string><json:string>Jung et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Becker et al. 1994, 1998</json:string><json:string>Becker et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Kan et al.</json:string><json:string>Lineboom et al.</json:string><json:string>Huys 2001</json:string><json:string>De Boever et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Chen et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Chen et al. (2007a, b)</json:string><json:string>Lindeboom et al. 2006a</json:string><json:string>Siegenthaler et al.</json:string><json:string>Pjetursson et al. 2004, 2007</json:string><json:string>Bogaerde et al.</json:string><json:string>Juodzbalys et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>De Rouck et al.</json:string><json:string>Ferrara et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Kirkwood & Sterne 2003a</json:string><json:string>Adell et al. 1981</json:string><json:string>Crespi et al. 2009a</json:string><json:string>Kan et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Covani et al. (2004a,b)</json:string><json:string>Tortamano et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Crespi et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Gokcen-Rohlig et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Lindeboom et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Fugazzotto 2002a</json:string><json:string>Mijiritsky et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Lang et al.</json:string><json:string>Juodzbalys et al.</json:string><json:string>Klokkevold et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Fugazzotto et al.</json:string><json:string>Bianchi et al.</json:string><json:string>Becker et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Crespi et al.</json:string><json:string>Gocen-Rohlig et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Ribeiro et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Canullo et al. 2009a,b</json:string><json:string>Kan et al. (2011)</json:string><json:string>Siegenthaler et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Covani et al. (2004b)</json:string><json:string>Juodzbalys & Wang 2007</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-M10X21DR-C</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x</json:string></doi><id>7A763A06B75DB8CC346251F3523A436CA54BE30D</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7A763A06B75DB8CC346251F3523A436CA54BE30D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7A763A06B75DB8CC346251F3523A436CA54BE30D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7A763A06B75DB8CC346251F3523A436CA54BE30D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="review-article" source="reviewArticle" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="review-article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Niklaus P.</forename><surname>Lang</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Faculty of Dentistry</orgName><orgName>Prince Philip Dental Hospital</orgName><orgName>The University of Hong Kong</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Hong Kong</settlement><region>SAR</region><country key="CN">China</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Lui</forename><surname>Pun</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Faculty of Dentistry</orgName><orgName>Prince Philip Dental Hospital</orgName><orgName>The University of Hong Kong</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Hong Kong</settlement><region>SAR</region><country key="CN">China</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Ka Yee</forename><surname>Lau</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Faculty of Dentistry</orgName><orgName>Prince Philip Dental Hospital</orgName><orgName>The University of Hong Kong</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Hong Kong</settlement><region>SAR</region><country key="CN">China</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author: Ka Yee Lau The University of Hong Kong Faculty of Dentistry Prince Philip Dental Hospital Hong Kong SAR China Tel.: +85 294 876 677 e‐mail: iriskylau@hotmail.com</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Ka Yan</forename><surname>Li</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Faculty of Dentistry</orgName><orgName>Prince Philip Dental Hospital</orgName><orgName>The University of Hong Kong</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Hong Kong</settlement><region>SAR</region><country key="CN">China</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">May CM</forename><surname>Wong</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Faculty of Dentistry</orgName><orgName>Prince Philip Dental Hospital</orgName><orgName>The University of Hong Kong</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Hong Kong</settlement><region>SAR</region><country key="CN">China</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">7A763A06B75DB8CC346251F3523A436CA54BE30D</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-M10X21DR-C</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2372</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2372.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="sub">Osteology Foundation, 6th Expert Meeting</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2011.23.issue-s5</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="39">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="66">66</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">28</biblScope><date type="published" when="2012-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="clr2372-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head><p>Type I immediate implant placement has gained popularity because it may reduce treatment time, number of surgeries and post‐extraction bone loss. However, this is potentially challenged by inadequate keratinized mucosa for flap adaptation and difficulties in achieving primary stability. Moreover, it has been proven that post‐extraction bone loss is an inevitable biological process, which affects treatment outcomes.</p><p>To estimate survival and success rates of implants and the implant‐supported prostheses, the prevalence of biological, technical and aesthetic complications, and the magnitude of soft and hard tissue changes following implant placement immediately into fresh extraction sockets.</p><p><hi rend="fc">MEDLINE</hi><hi rend="fc">P</hi><hi rend="fc">M</hi><hi rend="fc">C</hi><hi rend="fc">J</hi><hi rend="fc">STATA</hi><:t>An electronic search in</:t><:t>(</:t><:t>ub</:t><:t>ed) and the</:t><:t>ochrane Library from 1991 to</:t><:t>uly 2010 was performed to include prospective studies on immediate implants with a mean follow‐up time of at least 1 year. The survival rates were computed using the</:t><:t>statistical software. Weighted means of soft and hard tissue changes were obtained by the inverse variance method.</:t></p><p>A total of 46 prospective studies, with a mean follow‐up time of 2.08 years, were included. The annual failure rate of immediate implants was 0.82% (95% CI: 0.48–1.39%), translating into the 2‐year survival rate of 98.4% (97.3–99%). Among the five factors analysed (reasons for extraction, antibiotic use, position of implant [anterior vs. posterior, maxilla vs. mandible), type of loading], only the regimen of antibiotic use affected the survival rate significantly. Lower failure rates were found in groups that were provided with a course of post‐operative antibiotics. The success of implant therapy was difficult to assess due to scarce reporting on biological, technical and aesthetic complications. Soft tissue changes occurred mostly in the first 3 months after the provision of restoration, and then stabilized towards end of the first year. Marginal bone loss predominantly took place in the first year after implant placement, with a magnitude generally less than 1 mm. Controversy on hard tissue preservation with platform‐switching technique remained unsolved.</p><p>Despite the high survival rate observed, more long‐term studies are necessary to determine the success of implant treatment provided immediately after tooth extraction. Special attention has to be given to aesthetic outcomes.</p><:t>Background</:t><:t>Objectives</:t><:t>Material and methods</:t><:t>Results</:t><:t>Conclusions</:t></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="clr2372-kwd-0001">extraction sockets</term><term xml:id="clr2372-kwd-0002">immediate implants</term><term xml:id="clr2372-kwd-0003">implant dentistry</term><term xml:id="clr2372-kwd-0004">success</term><term xml:id="clr2372-kwd-0005">survival</term><term xml:id="clr2372-kwd-0006">systematic review</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Systematic Reviews</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Systematic Reviews</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change>undefined</change><change>[object Object]</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7A763A06B75DB8CC346251F3523A436CA54BE30D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="clr2372" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title type="short">Clin. Oral. Impl. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02005"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2011.23.issue-s5</doi><titleGroup><title type="specialIssueTitle">Osteology Foundation, 6<sup>th</sup> Expert Meeting</title>
</titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="23" type="journalVolume">23</numbering><numbering type="supplement">s5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-02">February 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="50" status="forIssue" type="reviewArticle"><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2372"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="28" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Systematic Reviews</title><title type="tocHeading1">Systematic Reviews</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2011-10-11" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2011-10-31" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-12-28"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-12-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">39</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">66</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line><b>Corresponding author:</b></line><line><i>Ka Yee Lau</i></line><line>The University of Hong Kong</line><line>Faculty of Dentistry</line><line>Prince Philip Dental Hospital</line><line>Hong Kong</line><line>SAR</line><line>China</line><line>Tel.: +85 294 876 677</line><line>e‐mail: <email>iriskylau@hotmail.com</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="clr2372-cit-0148">Lang NP, Lui P, Lau KY, Li KY, Wong MCM. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year. <i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</i> <b>23</b>(Suppl. 5), 2012, 39–66</citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2372.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year</title><title type="shortAuthors">Lang et al</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#clr2372-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2372-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Niklaus P.</givenNames> <familyName>Lang</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2372-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2372-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Lui</givenNames> <familyName>Pun</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2372-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2372-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Ka Yee</givenNames> <familyName>Lau</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2372-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2372-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>Ka Yan</givenNames> <familyName>Li</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2372-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2372-cr-0005"><personName><givenNames>May CM</givenNames> <familyName>Wong</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="CN" type="organization" xml:id="clr2372-aff-0001"><orgName>The University of Hong Kong</orgName> <orgDiv>Faculty of Dentistry</orgDiv> <orgDiv>Prince Philip Dental Hospital</orgDiv> <address><city>Hong Kong</city> <countryPart>SAR</countryPart> <country>China</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="clr2372-kwd-0001">extraction sockets</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2372-kwd-0002">immediate implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2372-kwd-0003">implant dentistry</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2372-kwd-0004">success</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2372-kwd-0005">survival</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2372-kwd-0006">systematic review</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>Osteology Foundation</fundingAgency></fundingInfo><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>Clinical Research Foundation</fundingAgency></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="clr2372-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="clr2372-sec-0001"><title type="main">Background</title><p>Type I immediate implant placement has gained popularity because it may reduce treatment time, number of surgeries and post‐extraction bone loss. However, this is potentially challenged by inadequate keratinized mucosa for flap adaptation and difficulties in achieving primary stability. Moreover, it has been proven that post‐extraction bone loss is an inevitable biological process, which affects treatment outcomes.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2372-sec-0002"><title type="main">Objectives</title><p>To estimate survival and success rates of implants and the implant‐supported prostheses, the prevalence of biological, technical and aesthetic complications, and the magnitude of soft and hard tissue changes following implant placement immediately into fresh extraction sockets.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2372-sec-0003"><title type="main">Material and methods</title><p>An electronic search in <fc>MEDLINE</fc> (<fc>P</fc>ub<fc>M</fc>ed) and the <fc>C</fc>ochrane Library from 1991 to <fc>J</fc>uly 2010 was performed to include prospective studies on immediate implants with a mean follow‐up time of at least 1 year. The survival rates were computed using the <fc>STATA</fc> statistical software. Weighted means of soft and hard tissue changes were obtained by the inverse variance method.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2372-sec-0004"><title type="main">Results</title><p>A total of 46 prospective studies, with a mean follow‐up time of 2.08 years, were included. The annual failure rate of immediate implants was 0.82% (95% CI: 0.48–1.39%), translating into the 2‐year survival rate of 98.4% (97.3–99%). Among the five factors analysed (reasons for extraction, antibiotic use, position of implant [anterior vs. posterior, maxilla vs. mandible), type of loading], only the regimen of antibiotic use affected the survival rate significantly. Lower failure rates were found in groups that were provided with a course of post‐operative antibiotics. The success of implant therapy was difficult to assess due to scarce reporting on biological, technical and aesthetic complications. Soft tissue changes occurred mostly in the first 3 months after the provision of restoration, and then stabilized towards end of the first year. Marginal bone loss predominantly took place in the first year after implant placement, with a magnitude generally less than 1 mm. Controversy on hard tissue preservation with platform‐switching technique remained unsolved.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2372-sec-0005"><title type="main">Conclusions</title><p>Despite the high survival rate observed, more long‐term studies are necessary to determine the success of implant treatment provided immediately after tooth extraction. Special attention has to be given to aesthetic outcomes.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Niklaus P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lang</namePart><affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lui</namePart><namePart type="family">Pun</namePart><affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ka Yee</namePart><namePart type="family">Lau</namePart><affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</affiliation><affiliation>The University of Hong KongFaculty of DentistryPrince Philip Dental HospitalHong KongSARChinaTel.: +85 294 876 677e‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: iriskylau@hotmail.com</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ka Yan</namePart><namePart type="family">Li</namePart><affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">May CM</namePart><namePart type="family">Wong</namePart><affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong, China</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="reviewArticle" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-02</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2011-10-31</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2011-10-11</dateValid><edition>Lang NP, Lui P, Lau KY, Li KY, Wong MCM. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23(Suppl. 5), 2012, 39–66</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>Type I immediate implant placement has gained popularity because it may reduce treatment time, number of surgeries and post‐extraction bone loss. However, this is potentially challenged by inadequate keratinized mucosa for flap adaptation and difficulties in achieving primary stability. Moreover, it has been proven that post‐extraction bone loss is an inevitable biological process, which affects treatment outcomes.</abstract><abstract>To estimate survival and success rates of implants and the implant‐supported prostheses, the prevalence of biological, technical and aesthetic complications, and the magnitude of soft and hard tissue changes following implant placement immediately into fresh extraction sockets.</abstract><abstract>An electronic search in MEDLINE (PubMed) and the Cochrane Library from 1991 to July 2010 was performed to include prospective studies on immediate implants with a mean follow‐up time of at least 1 year. The survival rates were computed using the STATA statistical software. Weighted means of soft and hard tissue changes were obtained by the inverse variance method.</abstract><abstract>A total of 46 prospective studies, with a mean follow‐up time of 2.08 years, were included. The annual failure rate of immediate implants was 0.82% (95% CI: 0.48–1.39%), translating into the 2‐year survival rate of 98.4% (97.3–99%). Among the five factors analysed (reasons for extraction, antibiotic use, position of implant [anterior vs. posterior, maxilla vs. mandible), type of loading], only the regimen of antibiotic use affected the survival rate significantly. Lower failure rates were found in groups that were provided with a course of post‐operative antibiotics. The success of implant therapy was difficult to assess due to scarce reporting on biological, technical and aesthetic complications. Soft tissue changes occurred mostly in the first 3 months after the provision of restoration, and then stabilized towards end of the first year. Marginal bone loss predominantly took place in the first year after implant placement, with a magnitude generally less than 1 mm. Controversy on hard tissue preservation with platform‐switching technique remained unsolved.</abstract><abstract>Despite the high survival rate observed, more long‐term studies are necessary to determine the success of implant treatment provided immediately after tooth extraction. Special attention has to be given to aesthetic outcomes.</abstract><note type="funding">Osteology Foundation</note><note type="funding">Clinical Research Foundation</note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>extraction sockets</topic><topic>immediate implants</topic><topic>implant dentistry</topic><topic>success</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>systematic review</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Clin. Oral. Impl. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Systematic Reviews</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="title"><title>Osteology Foundation, 6th Expert Meeting</title></detail><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="supplement"><caption>Suppl. no.</caption><number>s5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>39</start><end>66</end><total>28</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">7A763A06B75DB8CC346251F3523A436CA54BE30D</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-M10X21DR-C</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2372</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7A763A06B75DB8CC346251F3523A436CA54BE30D/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003C52 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003C52 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:7A763A06B75DB8CC346251F3523A436CA54BE30D
|texte= A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |