LEXICAL FACTORS AND SEGMENTAL ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGESPEECH PRODUCTION
Identifieur interne : 003B68 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003B67; suivant : 003B69LEXICAL FACTORS AND SEGMENTAL ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGESPEECH PRODUCTION
Auteurs : James E. Flege ; Elaina M. Frieda ; Amanda C. Walley ; Lauren A. RandazzaSource :
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition [ 0272-2631 ] ; 1998-06.
Abstract
Voice onset time (VOT) was measured in the production of /t/ in the initial position of 60 English words spoken by native English (NE) speakers and native Spanish (NS) speakers who began learning English before or after the age of 21 years. The subjects rated the words for familiarity, age of acquisition, imageability, and relatedness to word(s) in the Spanish lexicon. The subjects in all three groups showed two well-known phonetic effects: They produced longer VOT values in the context of high than nonhigh vowels, and longer VOT in one- than in two-syllable words. As expected, the NS subjects who learned English prior to the age of 21 years judged the English words to be more familiar and more like a Spanish word than did the subjects who began learning English later in life. Also, many but not all of the NS subjects produced /t/ with shorter VOT values than did the NE subjects. However, regression analyses showed that none of the lexical factors mentioned above or the text frequency of the 60 English words examined affected the NS subjects' VOT values. Thus, variation in the accuracy with which NS subjects produce English /t/ must be accounted for by factors other than the lexical status of the words in which /t/ occurs.
Url:
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:78C72FBD7E3229E27640625DD9CB20E770A266FDLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>LEXICAL FACTORS AND SEGMENTAL ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGESPEECH PRODUCTION</title><author><name sortKey="Flege, James E" sort="Flege, James E" uniqKey="Flege J" first="James E." last="Flege">James E. Flege</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Frieda, Elaina M" sort="Frieda, Elaina M" uniqKey="Frieda E" first="Elaina M." last="Frieda">Elaina M. Frieda</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Walley, Amanda C" sort="Walley, Amanda C" uniqKey="Walley A" first="Amanda C." last="Walley">Amanda C. Walley</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Randazza, Lauren A" sort="Randazza, Lauren A" uniqKey="Randazza L" first="Lauren A." last="Randazza">Lauren A. Randazza</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:78C72FBD7E3229E27640625DD9CB20E770A266FD</idno><date when="1998" year="1998">1998</date><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/78C72FBD7E3229E27640625DD9CB20E770A266FD/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003B68</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003B68</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">LEXICAL FACTORS AND SEGMENTAL ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGESPEECH PRODUCTION</title><author><name sortKey="Flege, James E" sort="Flege, James E" uniqKey="Flege J" first="James E." last="Flege">James E. Flege</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Frieda, Elaina M" sort="Frieda, Elaina M" uniqKey="Frieda E" first="Elaina M." last="Frieda">Elaina M. Frieda</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Walley, Amanda C" sort="Walley, Amanda C" uniqKey="Walley A" first="Amanda C." last="Walley">Amanda C. Walley</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Randazza, Lauren A" sort="Randazza, Lauren A" uniqKey="Randazza L" first="Lauren A." last="Randazza">Lauren A. Randazza</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Studies in Second Language Acquisition</title><idno type="ISSN">0272-2631</idno><idno type="eISSN">1470-1545</idno><imprint><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="1998-06">1998-06</date><biblScope unit="volume">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="155">155</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="187">187</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0272-2631</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0272-2631</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Voice onset time (VOT) was measured in the production of /t/ in the initial position of 60 English words spoken by native English (NE) speakers and native Spanish (NS) speakers who began learning English before or after the age of 21 years. The subjects rated the words for familiarity, age of acquisition, imageability, and relatedness to word(s) in the Spanish lexicon. The subjects in all three groups showed two well-known phonetic effects: They produced longer VOT values in the context of high than nonhigh vowels, and longer VOT in one- than in two-syllable words. As expected, the NS subjects who learned English prior to the age of 21 years judged the English words to be more familiar and more like a Spanish word than did the subjects who began learning English later in life. Also, many but not all of the NS subjects produced /t/ with shorter VOT values than did the NE subjects. However, regression analyses showed that none of the lexical factors mentioned above or the text frequency of the 60 English words examined affected the NS subjects' VOT values. Thus, variation in the accuracy with which NS subjects produce English /t/ must be accounted for by factors other than the lexical status of the words in which /t/ occurs.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>cambridge</corpusName><author><json:item><name>James E. Flege</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Alabama at Birmingham</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Elaina M. Frieda</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Alabama at Birmingham</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Amanda C. Walley</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Alabama at Birmingham</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Lauren A. Randazza</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Alabama at Birmingham</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6GQ-L8HCCJZZ-7</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Voice onset time (VOT) was measured in the production of /t/ in the initial position of 60 English words spoken by native English (NE) speakers and native Spanish (NS) speakers who began learning English before or after the age of 21 years. The subjects rated the words for familiarity, age of acquisition, imageability, and relatedness to word(s) in the Spanish lexicon. The subjects in all three groups showed two well-known phonetic effects: They produced longer VOT values in the context of high than nonhigh vowels, and longer VOT in one- than in two-syllable words. As expected, the NS subjects who learned English prior to the age of 21 years judged the English words to be more familiar and more like a Spanish word than did the subjects who began learning English later in life. Also, many but not all of the NS subjects produced /t/ with shorter VOT values than did the NE subjects. However, regression analyses showed that none of the lexical factors mentioned above or the text frequency of the 60 English words examined affected the NS subjects' VOT values. Thus, variation in the accuracy with which NS subjects produce English /t/ must be accounted for by factors other than the lexical status of the words in which /t/ occurs.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.544</score><pdfWordCount>12021</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>70875</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>33</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>212</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1242</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>LEXICAL FACTORS AND SEGMENTAL ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGESPEECH PRODUCTION</title><pii><json:string>S0272263198002034</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Studies in Second Language Acquisition</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><issn><json:string>0272-2631</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1470-1545</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>SLA</json:string></publisherId><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>155</first><last>187</last><total>33</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6GQ-L8HCCJZZ-7</json:string></ark><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1998</copyrightDate><id>78C72FBD7E3229E27640625DD9CB20E770A266FD</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/78C72FBD7E3229E27640625DD9CB20E770A266FD/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/78C72FBD7E3229E27640625DD9CB20E770A266FD/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/78C72FBD7E3229E27640625DD9CB20E770A266FD/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/78C72FBD7E3229E27640625DD9CB20E770A266FD/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">LEXICAL FACTORS AND SEGMENTAL ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGESPEECH PRODUCTION</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher scheme="https://publisher-list.data.istex.fr">Cambridge University Press</publisher><availability><licence><p>© 1998 Cambridge University Press</p></licence><p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</p></availability><date>1998-06-01</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note><note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">LEXICAL FACTORS AND SEGMENTAL ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGESPEECH PRODUCTION</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">James E.</forename><surname>Flege</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Elaina M.</forename><surname>Frieda</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Amanda C.</forename><surname>Walley</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Lauren A.</forename><surname>Randazza</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">78C72FBD7E3229E27640625DD9CB20E770A266FD</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-L8HCCJZZ-7</idno><idno type="PII">S0272263198002034</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Studies in Second Language Acquisition</title><idno type="pISSN">0272-2631</idno><idno type="eISSN">1470-1545</idno><idno type="publisher-id">SLA</idno><imprint><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="1998-06"></date><biblScope unit="volume">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="155">155</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="187">187</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1998-06-01</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>Voice onset time (VOT) was measured in the production of /t/ in the initial position of 60 English words spoken by native English (NE) speakers and native Spanish (NS) speakers who began learning English before or after the age of 21 years. The subjects rated the words for familiarity, age of acquisition, imageability, and relatedness to word(s) in the Spanish lexicon. The subjects in all three groups showed two well-known phonetic effects: They produced longer VOT values in the context of high than nonhigh vowels, and longer VOT in one- than in two-syllable words. As expected, the NS subjects who learned English prior to the age of 21 years judged the English words to be more familiar and more like a Spanish word than did the subjects who began learning English later in life. Also, many but not all of the NS subjects produced /t/ with shorter VOT values than did the NE subjects. However, regression analyses showed that none of the lexical factors mentioned above or the text frequency of the 60 English words examined affected the NS subjects' VOT values. Thus, variation in the accuracy with which NS subjects produce English /t/ must be accounted for by factors other than the lexical status of the words in which /t/ occurs.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1998-06-01">Created</change><change when="1998-06">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-09-5">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus cambridge not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" URI="JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article dtd-version="1.0" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SLA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Studies in Second Language Acquisition</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Stud Second Lang Acquis</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1470-1545</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">0272-2631</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pii">S0272263198002034</article-id><title-group><article-title>LEXICAL FACTORS AND SEGMENTAL ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGE
SPEECH PRODUCTION</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib><name><surname>Flege</surname><given-names>James E.</given-names></name><aff><institution>University of Alabama at Birmingham</institution></aff></contrib><contrib><name><surname>Frieda</surname><given-names>Elaina M.</given-names></name><aff><institution>University of Alabama at Birmingham</institution></aff></contrib><contrib><name><surname>Walley</surname><given-names>Amanda C.</given-names></name><aff><institution>University of Alabama at Birmingham</institution></aff></contrib><contrib><name><surname>Randazza</surname><given-names>Lauren A.</given-names></name><aff><institution>University of Alabama at Birmingham</institution></aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>1</day><month>6</month><year>1998</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>06</month><year>1998</year></pub-date><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>155</fpage><lpage>187</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© 1998 Cambridge University Press</copyright-statement></permissions><abstract><p>Voice onset time (VOT) was measured in the production of /t/ in the initial position
of 60 English words spoken by native English (NE) speakers and native Spanish (NS) speakers
who began learning English before or after the age of 21 years. The subjects rated the words for
familiarity, age of acquisition, imageability, and relatedness to word(s) in the Spanish lexicon.
The subjects in all three groups showed two well-known phonetic effects: They produced longer
VOT values in the context of high than nonhigh vowels, and longer VOT in one- than in
two-syllable words. As expected, the NS subjects who learned English prior to the age of 21
years judged the English words to be more familiar and more like a Spanish word than did the
subjects who began learning English later in life. Also, many but not all of the NS subjects
produced /t/ with shorter VOT values than did the NE subjects. However, regression
analyses showed that none of the lexical factors mentioned above or the text frequency of the 60
English words examined affected the NS subjects' VOT values. Thus, variation in the
accuracy with which NS subjects produce English /t/ must be accounted for by factors
other than the lexical status of the words in which /t/ occurs.</p></abstract><counts><page-count count="33"></page-count></counts><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>pdf</meta-name><meta-value>S0272263198002034a.pdf</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>LEXICAL FACTORS AND SEGMENTAL ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGESPEECH PRODUCTION</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>LEXICAL FACTORS AND SEGMENTAL ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGE SPEECH PRODUCTION</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">James E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Flege</namePart><affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Elaina M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Frieda</namePart><affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Amanda C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Walley</namePart><affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lauren A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Randazza</namePart><affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-06</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">1998-06-01</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1998</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract>Voice onset time (VOT) was measured in the production of /t/ in the initial position of 60 English words spoken by native English (NE) speakers and native Spanish (NS) speakers who began learning English before or after the age of 21 years. The subjects rated the words for familiarity, age of acquisition, imageability, and relatedness to word(s) in the Spanish lexicon. The subjects in all three groups showed two well-known phonetic effects: They produced longer VOT values in the context of high than nonhigh vowels, and longer VOT in one- than in two-syllable words. As expected, the NS subjects who learned English prior to the age of 21 years judged the English words to be more familiar and more like a Spanish word than did the subjects who began learning English later in life. Also, many but not all of the NS subjects produced /t/ with shorter VOT values than did the NE subjects. However, regression analyses showed that none of the lexical factors mentioned above or the text frequency of the 60 English words examined affected the NS subjects' VOT values. Thus, variation in the accuracy with which NS subjects produce English /t/ must be accounted for by factors other than the lexical status of the words in which /t/ occurs.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Studies in Second Language Acquisition</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0272-2631</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1470-1545</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">SLA</identifier><part><date>1998</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>20</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>155</start><end>187</end><total>33</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">78C72FBD7E3229E27640625DD9CB20E770A266FD</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-L8HCCJZZ-7</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0272263198002034</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 1998 Cambridge University Press</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>© 1998 Cambridge University Press</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/78C72FBD7E3229E27640625DD9CB20E770A266FD/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003B68 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003B68 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:78C72FBD7E3229E27640625DD9CB20E770A266FD
|texte= LEXICAL FACTORS AND SEGMENTAL ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGESPEECH PRODUCTION
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |