EdenteV2, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 003B48

Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment

Identifieur interne : 003B48 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003B47; suivant : 003B49

Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment

Auteurs : Liene Molly ; Marc Quirynen ; Katleen Michiels ; Daniel Van Steenberghe

Source :

Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2006-10.

RBID : ISTEX:786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D

English descriptors

Abstract

Objectives: Patients in need of bone augmentation procedures can be treated with a traditional hip graft or by neogenesis under a stiff occlusive titanium membrane, custom‐fit on the basis of CT‐scan data.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01286.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment</title>
<author><name sortKey="Molly, Liene" sort="Molly, Liene" uniqKey="Molly L" first="Liene" last="Molly">Liene Molly</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Michiels, Katleen" sort="Michiels, Katleen" uniqKey="Michiels K" first="Katleen" last="Michiels">Katleen Michiels</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Steenberghe, Daniel Van" sort="Steenberghe, Daniel Van" uniqKey="Steenberghe D" first="Daniel Van" last="Steenberghe">Daniel Van Steenberghe</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D</idno>
<date when="2006" year="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01286.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003B48</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003B48</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment</title>
<author><name sortKey="Molly, Liene" sort="Molly, Liene" uniqKey="Molly L" first="Liene" last="Molly">Liene Molly</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Michiels, Katleen" sort="Michiels, Katleen" uniqKey="Michiels K" first="Katleen" last="Michiels">Katleen Michiels</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Steenberghe, Daniel Van" sort="Steenberghe, Daniel Van" uniqKey="Steenberghe D" first="Daniel Van" last="Steenberghe">Daniel Van Steenberghe</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">17</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="481">481</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="487">487</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2006-10">2006-10</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment surgery</term>
<term>Anterior region</term>
<term>Augmentation</term>
<term>Autogenous</term>
<term>Blackwell munksgaard</term>
<term>Blackwell munksgaard molly</term>
<term>Blood clot</term>
<term>Bone augmentation</term>
<term>Bone height</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Bone regeneration</term>
<term>Buser</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Cumulative failure rate</term>
<term>Customised titanium membrane</term>
<term>Distal areas</term>
<term>Failure rate</term>
<term>Graft</term>
<term>Healing period</term>
<term>Iliac</term>
<term>Impl</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Journal compilation</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Maxillofacial</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Membrane</term>
<term>Munksgaard</term>
<term>Natural dentition</term>
<term>Nemark</term>
<term>Onlay</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Posterior region</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Quirynen</term>
<term>Resorption</term>
<term>Restorative dentistry</term>
<term>Steenberghe</term>
<term>Titanium</term>
<term>Titanium membrane</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment surgery</term>
<term>Anterior region</term>
<term>Augmentation</term>
<term>Autogenous</term>
<term>Blackwell munksgaard</term>
<term>Blackwell munksgaard molly</term>
<term>Blood clot</term>
<term>Bone augmentation</term>
<term>Bone height</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Bone regeneration</term>
<term>Buser</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Cumulative failure rate</term>
<term>Customised titanium membrane</term>
<term>Distal areas</term>
<term>Failure rate</term>
<term>Graft</term>
<term>Healing period</term>
<term>Iliac</term>
<term>Impl</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Journal compilation</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Maxillofacial</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Membrane</term>
<term>Munksgaard</term>
<term>Natural dentition</term>
<term>Nemark</term>
<term>Onlay</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Posterior region</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Quirynen</term>
<term>Resorption</term>
<term>Restorative dentistry</term>
<term>Steenberghe</term>
<term>Titanium</term>
<term>Titanium membrane</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Objectives: Patients in need of bone augmentation procedures can be treated with a traditional hip graft or by neogenesis under a stiff occlusive titanium membrane, custom‐fit on the basis of CT‐scan data.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string>
<json:string>augmentation</json:string>
<json:string>graft</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>steenberghe</json:string>
<json:string>onlay</json:string>
<json:string>titanium membrane</json:string>
<json:string>bone augmentation</json:string>
<json:string>abutment</json:string>
<json:string>nemark</json:string>
<json:string>international journal</json:string>
<json:string>quirynen</json:string>
<json:string>titanium</json:string>
<json:string>maxillofacial</json:string>
<json:string>implants research</json:string>
<json:string>anterior region</json:string>
<json:string>implant placement</json:string>
<json:string>prosthesis</json:string>
<json:string>autogenous</json:string>
<json:string>resorption</json:string>
<json:string>journal compilation</json:string>
<json:string>oral impl</json:string>
<json:string>impl</json:string>
<json:string>abutment surgery</json:string>
<json:string>munksgaard</json:string>
<json:string>buser</json:string>
<json:string>clin</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegrated</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone level</json:string>
<json:string>customised titanium membrane</json:string>
<json:string>posterior region</json:string>
<json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string>
<json:string>iliac</json:string>
<json:string>membrane</json:string>
<json:string>bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>cumulative failure rate</json:string>
<json:string>bone height</json:string>
<json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string>
<json:string>blackwell munksgaard molly</json:string>
<json:string>blood clot</json:string>
<json:string>distal areas</json:string>
<json:string>blackwell munksgaard</json:string>
<json:string>restorative dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>failure rate</json:string>
<json:string>healing period</json:string>
<json:string>prospective study</json:string>
<json:string>natural dentition</json:string>
<json:string>bone regeneration</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>Liene Molly</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Marc Quirynen</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Katleen Michiels</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Daniel van Steenberghe</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>bone augmentation</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>hip onlay</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>titanium membrane</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId><json:string>CLR1286</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-PCPGSB8C-Q</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Objectives: Patients in need of bone augmentation procedures can be treated with a traditional hip graft or by neogenesis under a stiff occlusive titanium membrane, custom‐fit on the basis of CT‐scan data.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>7.161</score>
<pdfWordCount>4777</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>29512</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>32</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>205</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>3</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment</title>
<pmid><json:string>16958685</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre><json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string>
</doi>
<issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>17</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<pages><first>481</first>
<last>487</last>
<total>7</total>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2006</json:string>
<json:string>20th century</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName></orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>Steenberghe</json:string>
<json:string>Daniel van Steenberghe</json:string>
<json:string>Periodontology</json:string>
<json:string>Ma Group</json:string>
<json:string>D. Comparison</json:string>
<json:string>Autografts</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>Kalmar</json:string>
<json:string>Sweden</json:string>
<json:string>Vinci</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl><json:string>Carinci et al. 2005</json:string>
<json:string>Nevins et al. 1998</json:string>
<json:string>Beckers & Freitag 1980</json:string>
<json:string>Lundgren et al. 2000</json:string>
<json:string>Caiazza et al. (2000)</json:string>
<json:string>Listrom & Symington 1988</json:string>
<json:string>Quirynen et al. 1992</json:string>
<json:string>von Arx et al. 2001a, 2001b</json:string>
<json:string>Maiorana et al. (2005)</json:string>
<json:string>van Steenberghe et al. 1997</json:string>
<json:string>von Arx et al. 2001b</json:string>
<json:string>Larsson et al. 1996</json:string>
<json:string>Joshi & Kostakis 2004</json:string>
<json:string>Maiorana et al. 2005</json:string>
<json:string>Donos et al. 2005</json:string>
<json:string>Albrektsson et al. 1981</json:string>
<json:string>Becker et al. 1996</json:string>
<json:string>Buser et al. 1996</json:string>
<json:string>Johansson et al. 1999</json:string>
<json:string>Molly et al</json:string>
<json:string>van Steenberghe et al. 1991, 1997</json:string>
<json:string>Sanchez-Garces & Gay-Escoda 2004</json:string>
<json:string>van Steenberghe et al. 1997, 2003</json:string>
<json:string>Lindquist et al. 1996</json:string>
<json:string>van Steenberghe et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Hermann & Buser 1996</json:string>
<json:string>Chacon et al. 2004</json:string>
<json:string>van Steenberghe et al. 1999</json:string>
<json:string>Carinci et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Miyata et al. 2002</json:string>
<json:string>Mare 2003</json:string>
<json:string>Quirynen et al. 2001</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-PCPGSB8C-Q</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string>
</scopus>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2006</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2006</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01286.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2006-10"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment</title>
<title level="a" type="short">Jaw bone augmentation</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Liene</forename>
<surname>Molly</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Marc</forename>
<surname>Quirynen</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Katleen</forename>
<surname>Michiels</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Daniel van</forename>
<surname>Steenberghe</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
<note type="foot">
              1Holder of the P‐I Brånemark Chair in Osseointegration.</note>
</author>
<idno type="istex">786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-PCPGSB8C-Q</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01286.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">CLR1286</idno>
<idno type="supplier">1286</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1286.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2006.17.issue-5</idno>
<idno type="product">CLR</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">17</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="481">481</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="487">487</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2006-10"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head>
<p><hi rend="bold">Objectives: </hi>
 Patients in need of bone augmentation procedures can be treated with a traditional hip graft or by neogenesis under a stiff occlusive titanium membrane, custom‐fit on the basis of CT‐scan data.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi>
 Eighteen patients treated by means of a hip graft (H) were compared with 11 patients using a full titanium membrane (M) for the rehabilitation of upper jaws. In the H group, 17 patients (62 implants) in the anterior region (Ha) and 14 patients (23 implants) in the posterior region (Hp) were included. In the M group, nine patients (30 implants) in the anterior region (Ma) and seven patients (16 implants) in the posterior region (Mp) were included.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi>
 In group Ha, the CFR was 13.3% after 14 years compared with group Ma where the CFR was 17.4% after 9 years. In group Hp, the CFR was 22.8% after 16 years compared with group Mp where the CFR was 23.4% after 6 years. The marginal bone loss for group Ha after 20 years was 2.7 mm, for group Ma it was not even 1 mm after 9 years; for group Hp, it was 2.5 mm after 15 years compared with less than 1 mm after 3 years in group Mp.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi>
 The success rate of alveolar ridge augmentation therapy is lower than in a classical approach. These augmentation procedures, however, show acceptable results. The titanium membrane augmentation leads to less marginal bone loss probably because neo‐formed bone has a better chance to adapt its mineralization to occlusal forces encountered. This technique could offer improvement if membrane exposure can be avoided.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bone augmentation</term>
<term xml:id="k2">hip onlay</term>
<term xml:id="k3">titanium membrane</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original articles</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi>
<issn type="print">0905-7161</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn>
<idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="10005"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2006.17.issue-5</doi>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="17">17</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2006-10">October 2006</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="1" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01286.x</doi>
<idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1286"></id>
<id type="supplier" value="1286"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2006-07-10"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2006-07-10"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-15"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="481">481</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="487">487</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence to:</b>
 
<i>Prof. D. van Steenberghe</i>
 Department of Periodontology Catholic University Leuven Kapucijnenvoer 7 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium Tel.: +32 16 33 24 07 Fax: +32 16 33 24 84 e‐mail: <email normalForm="daniel.vansteenberghe@uz.kuleuven.be">daniel.vansteenberghe@uz.kuleuven.be</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1286.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b>
 Accepted 12 January 2006</unparsedEditorialHistory>
<countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count>
<count type="formulaTotal" number="1"></count>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="37"></count>
<count type="wordTotal" number="5938"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="34"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main">Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">Molly et al.</title>
<title type="short">Jaw bone augmentation</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Liene</givenNames>
<familyName>Molly</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Marc</givenNames>
<familyName>Quirynen</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Katleen</givenNames>
<familyName>Michiels</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1" noteRef="#fn1"><personName><givenNames>Daniel van</givenNames>
<familyName>Steenberghe</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bone augmentation</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">hip onlay</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">titanium membrane</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title>
<p><b>Objectives: </b>
 Patients in need of bone augmentation procedures can be treated with a traditional hip graft or by neogenesis under a stiff occlusive titanium membrane, custom‐fit on the basis of CT‐scan data.</p>
<p><b>Material and methods: </b>
 Eighteen patients treated by means of a hip graft (H) were compared with 11 patients using a full titanium membrane (M) for the rehabilitation of upper jaws. In the H group, 17 patients (62 implants) in the anterior region (Ha) and 14 patients (23 implants) in the posterior region (Hp) were included. In the M group, nine patients (30 implants) in the anterior region (Ma) and seven patients (16 implants) in the posterior region (Mp) were included.</p>
<p><b>Results: </b>
 In group Ha, the CFR was 13.3% after 14 years compared with group Ma where the CFR was 17.4% after 9 years. In group Hp, the CFR was 22.8% after 16 years compared with group Mp where the CFR was 23.4% after 6 years. The marginal bone loss for group Ha after 20 years was 2.7 mm, for group Ma it was not even 1 mm after 9 years; for group Hp, it was 2.5 mm after 15 years compared with less than 1 mm after 3 years in group Mp.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions: </b>
 The success rate of alveolar ridge augmentation therapy is lower than in a classical approach. These augmentation procedures, however, show acceptable results. The titanium membrane augmentation leads to less marginal bone loss probably because neo‐formed bone has a better chance to adapt its mineralization to occlusal forces encountered. This technique could offer improvement if membrane exposure can be avoided.</p><!--

          
            To cite this article:
            

Molly L, Quirynen M, Michiels K, van Steenberghe D. Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment.

Clin. Oral Impl. Res.17, 2006; 481–487

doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01286.x
        
--></abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
<noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1" numbered="no"><p><sup>1</sup>
Holder of the P‐I Brånemark Chair in Osseointegration.</p>
</note>
</noteGroup>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Jaw bone augmentation</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Liene</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Molly</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marc</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Katleen</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Michiels</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniel van</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Steenberghe</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo‐Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation>
<description>1Holder of the P‐I Brånemark Chair in Osseointegration.</description>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2006-10</dateIssued>
<edition>Date: Accepted 12 January 2006</edition>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2006</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">6</extent>
<extent unit="tables">1</extent>
<extent unit="formulas">1</extent>
<extent unit="references">37</extent>
<extent unit="linksCrossRef">34</extent>
<extent unit="words">5938</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract>Objectives: Patients in need of bone augmentation procedures can be treated with a traditional hip graft or by neogenesis under a stiff occlusive titanium membrane, custom‐fit on the basis of CT‐scan data.</abstract>
<abstract>Material and methods: Eighteen patients treated by means of a hip graft (H) were compared with 11 patients using a full titanium membrane (M) for the rehabilitation of upper jaws. In the H group, 17 patients (62 implants) in the anterior region (Ha) and 14 patients (23 implants) in the posterior region (Hp) were included. In the M group, nine patients (30 implants) in the anterior region (Ma) and seven patients (16 implants) in the posterior region (Mp) were included.</abstract>
<abstract>Results: In group Ha, the CFR was 13.3% after 14 years compared with group Ma where the CFR was 17.4% after 9 years. In group Hp, the CFR was 22.8% after 16 years compared with group Mp where the CFR was 23.4% after 6 years. The marginal bone loss for group Ha after 20 years was 2.7 mm, for group Ma it was not even 1 mm after 9 years; for group Hp, it was 2.5 mm after 15 years compared with less than 1 mm after 3 years in group Mp.</abstract>
<abstract>Conclusions: The success rate of alveolar ridge augmentation therapy is lower than in a classical approach. These augmentation procedures, however, show acceptable results. The titanium membrane augmentation leads to less marginal bone loss probably because neo‐formed bone has a better chance to adapt its mineralization to occlusal forces encountered. This technique could offer improvement if membrane exposure can be avoided.</abstract>
<subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>bone augmentation</topic>
<topic>hip onlay</topic>
<topic>titanium membrane</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier>
<part><date>2006</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>17</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>5</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>481</start>
<end>487</end>
<total>7</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-PCPGSB8C-Q</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01286.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1286</identifier>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003B48 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003B48 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:786BEB42706A63DA6798DAF701F8DDF421EC283D
   |texte=   Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment

Comparison between jaw bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium membrane or an autologous hip graft: a retrospective clinical assessment

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri