A controlled clinical trial of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures; five‐years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants
Identifieur interne : 003627 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003626; suivant : 003628A controlled clinical trial of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures; five‐years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants
Auteurs : Henny J. A. Meijer ; Gerry M. Raghoebar ; Martin A. Van T Hof ; Anita Visser ; Mariëlle E. Geertman ; Robert P. Van OortSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2000-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acrylic resin, Aftercare, Batenburg, Bone level, Bone level scores, Bone loss, Calculus, Calculus index, Cinco anos, Clinical aspects, Clinical implant performance scale, Clinical items, Clinical state, Clinical trial, Dental implants, Denture, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Functional loading, Gingiva, Gingiva index, Implant, Implant length, Implant system, Implant systems, Implants research, International journal, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Meijer, Minor complications, Oort, Oral implantology, Osseointegration period, Overdenture, Overdentures, Panoramic radiographs, Plaque index, Prospective study, Prosthetic, Prosthetic aftercare, Prosthetic dentistry, Surgical, Survival rate, University hospital groningen.
- Teeft :
- Acrylic resin, Aftercare, Batenburg, Bone level, Bone level scores, Bone loss, Calculus, Calculus index, Cinco anos, Clinical aspects, Clinical implant performance scale, Clinical items, Clinical state, Clinical trial, Dental implants, Denture, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Functional loading, Gingiva, Gingiva index, Implant, Implant length, Implant system, Implant systems, Implants research, International journal, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Meijer, Minor complications, Oort, Oral implantology, Osseointegration period, Overdenture, Overdentures, Panoramic radiographs, Plaque index, Prospective study, Prosthetic, Prosthetic aftercare, Prosthetic dentistry, Surgical, Survival rate, University hospital groningen.
Abstract
The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate a set of clinical items and prosthetic aftercare of edentulous patients with a mandibular overdenture retained by 2 IMZ implants or 2 Brånemark implants during a 5‐years' period. Patients were allocated to the IMZ group (n=29) or the Brånemark group (n=32) by a computerized balancing method. In the IMZ group 4 implants were lost during the 5‐years' follow‐up (survival rate: 93%). In the Brånemark group 9 implants were lost (survival rate: 86%). All patients were re‐operated successfully. Multiple prosthetic revisions were necessary in both groups, especially the precision attachment system in the overdenture was subject to frequent fracture or loosening. From this study can be concluded that there is no difference in clinical state, radiographical state, survival rate and clinical implant performance between the IMZ implant system and the Brånemark implant system supporting an overdenture on 2 implants after 5 years of follow‐up.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005441.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:6DC28571D237D405C619367AC2A679A1D333D3B5Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A controlled clinical trial of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures; five‐years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants</title><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, Martin A" sort="Van T Hof, Martin A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="Martin A." last="Van T Hof">Martin A. Van T Hof</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Visser, Anita" sort="Visser, Anita" uniqKey="Visser A" first="Anita" last="Visser">Anita Visser</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Geertman, Marielle E" sort="Geertman, Marielle E" uniqKey="Geertman M" first="Mariëlle E." last="Geertman">Mariëlle E. Geertman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Oort, Robert P" sort="Van Oort, Robert P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="Robert P." last="Van Oort">Robert P. Van Oort</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6DC28571D237D405C619367AC2A679A1D333D3B5</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005441.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6DC28571D237D405C619367AC2A679A1D333D3B5/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003627</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003627</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A controlled clinical trial of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures; five‐years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants</title><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, Martin A" sort="Van T Hof, Martin A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="Martin A." last="Van T Hof">Martin A. Van T Hof</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Visser, Anita" sort="Visser, Anita" uniqKey="Visser A" first="Anita" last="Visser">Anita Visser</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Geertman, Marielle E" sort="Geertman, Marielle E" uniqKey="Geertman M" first="Mariëlle E." last="Geertman">Mariëlle E. Geertman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Oort, Robert P" sort="Van Oort, Robert P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="Robert P." last="Van Oort">Robert P. Van Oort</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="441">441</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="447">447</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-10">2000-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Aftercare</term><term>Batenburg</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone level scores</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Calculus</term><term>Calculus index</term><term>Cinco anos</term><term>Clinical aspects</term><term>Clinical implant performance scale</term><term>Clinical items</term><term>Clinical state</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Functional loading</term><term>Gingiva</term><term>Gingiva index</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Meijer</term><term>Minor complications</term><term>Oort</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Osseointegration period</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Panoramic radiographs</term><term>Plaque index</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic aftercare</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>University hospital groningen</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic resin</term><term>Aftercare</term><term>Batenburg</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone level scores</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Calculus</term><term>Calculus index</term><term>Cinco anos</term><term>Clinical aspects</term><term>Clinical implant performance scale</term><term>Clinical items</term><term>Clinical state</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Functional loading</term><term>Gingiva</term><term>Gingiva index</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Meijer</term><term>Minor complications</term><term>Oort</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Osseointegration period</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Panoramic radiographs</term><term>Plaque index</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic aftercare</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>University hospital groningen</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate a set of clinical items and prosthetic aftercare of edentulous patients with a mandibular overdenture retained by 2 IMZ implants or 2 Brånemark implants during a 5‐years' period. Patients were allocated to the IMZ group (n=29) or the Brånemark group (n=32) by a computerized balancing method. In the IMZ group 4 implants were lost during the 5‐years' follow‐up (survival rate: 93%). In the Brånemark group 9 implants were lost (survival rate: 86%). All patients were re‐operated successfully. Multiple prosthetic revisions were necessary in both groups, especially the precision attachment system in the overdenture was subject to frequent fracture or loosening. From this study can be concluded that there is no difference in clinical state, radiographical state, survival rate and clinical implant performance between the IMZ implant system and the Brånemark implant system supporting an overdenture on 2 implants after 5 years of follow‐up.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>implant system</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>aftercare</json:string><json:string>meijer</json:string><json:string>calculus</json:string><json:string>prosthetic aftercare</json:string><json:string>batenburg</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>endosseous</json:string><json:string>gingiva</json:string><json:string>oort</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>implant systems</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>implant length</json:string><json:string>clinical aspects</json:string><json:string>lower denture</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>gingiva index</json:string><json:string>plaque index</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>osseointegration period</json:string><json:string>calculus index</json:string><json:string>acrylic resin</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>clinical implant performance scale</json:string><json:string>endosseous implants</json:string><json:string>functional loading</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>minor complications</json:string><json:string>panoramic radiographs</json:string><json:string>bone level scores</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>clinical state</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>cinco anos</json:string><json:string>oral implantology</json:string><json:string>university hospital groningen</json:string><json:string>clinical items</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Henny J. A. Meijer</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Gerry M. Raghoebar</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Martin A. Van 't Hof</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Anita Visser</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Mariëlle E. Geertman</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Robert P. Van Oort</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>overdenture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>clinical aspects</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>aftercare</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>clr9o543</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-FFG6ZP5P-C</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate a set of clinical items and prosthetic aftercare of edentulous patients with a mandibular overdenture retained by 2 IMZ implants or 2 Brånemark implants during a 5‐years' period. Patients were allocated to the IMZ group (n=29) or the Brånemark group (n=32) by a computerized balancing method. In the IMZ group 4 implants were lost during the 5‐years' follow‐up (survival rate: 93%). In the Brånemark group 9 implants were lost (survival rate: 86%). All patients were re‐operated successfully. Multiple prosthetic revisions were necessary in both groups, especially the precision attachment system in the overdenture was subject to frequent fracture or loosening. From this study can be concluded that there is no difference in clinical state, radiographical state, survival rate and clinical implant performance between the IMZ implant system and the Brånemark implant system supporting an overdenture on 2 implants after 5 years of follow‐up.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.164</score><pdfWordCount>4304</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>27477</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 794 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>155</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1024</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A controlled clinical trial of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures; five‐years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants</title><pmid><json:string>11168236</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>441</first><last>447</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1</json:string><json:string>1987</json:string><json:string>3 and 1/2</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University Hospital Groningen</json:string><json:string>Netherlands Key</json:string><json:string>University of Nijmegen</json:string><json:string>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry</json:string><json:string>Netherlands Tel</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Robert P. Van Oort</json:string><json:string>Marielle E. Geertman</json:string><json:string>Results</json:string><json:string>Martin A. Van</json:string><json:string>H. J. A. Meijer</json:string><json:string>Anita Visser</json:string><json:string>J. A. Meijer</json:string><json:string>Gerry M. Raghoebar</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Groningen</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Mannheim</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Hof</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Antczak-Bouckoms 1988</json:string><json:string>Chao et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Barmes 1990</json:string><json:string>Batenburg et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Behr et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Walton & MacEntee, 1994</json:string><json:string>Boerrigter et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Boerrigter et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Versteegh et al. (1995)</json:string><json:string>Watson et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Brånemark et al. 1985</json:string><json:string>Kirsch & Mentag 1986</json:string><json:string>Mombelli et al. 1987</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Watson et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Mericske-Stern and Zarb (1993)</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Loe & Silness 1963</json:string><json:string>Hemmings et al. (1994)</json:string><json:string>Mericske-Stern et al. (1994)</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al.</json:string><json:string>Milholland et al. 1973</json:string><json:string>Geertman et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Jemt et al. (1996)</json:string><json:string>Batenburg et al. 1998a</json:string><json:string>Batenburg et al. (1994)</json:string><json:string>Roynesdal et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Zielhuis et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Batenburg et al. (1998b)</json:string><json:string>Geertman et al. (1996)</json:string><json:string>Hemmings et al. 1994</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-FFG6ZP5P-C</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005441.x</json:string></doi><id>6DC28571D237D405C619367AC2A679A1D333D3B5</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6DC28571D237D405C619367AC2A679A1D333D3B5/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6DC28571D237D405C619367AC2A679A1D333D3B5/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/6DC28571D237D405C619367AC2A679A1D333D3B5/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A controlled clinical trial of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures; five‐years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A controlled clinical trial of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures; five‐years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants</title><title level="a" type="short">IMZ implants versus Brånemark implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Henny J. A.</forename><surname>Meijer</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Gerry M.</forename><surname>Raghoebar</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Martin A.</forename><surname>Hof</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen;</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Anita</forename><surname>Visser</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Mariëlle E.</forename><surname>Geertman</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands<address><country key="NL"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Robert P.</forename><surname>Oort</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">6DC28571D237D405C619367AC2A679A1D333D3B5</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-FFG6ZP5P-C</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005441.x</idno><idno type="supplier">clr9o543</idno><idno type="unit">CLR11005441</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR11005441.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2000.11.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="441">441</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="447">447</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="italic">n</hi><hi rend="italic">n</hi><:t>The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate a set of clinical items and prosthetic aftercare of edentulous patients with a mandibular overdenture retained by 2 IMZ implants or 2 Brånemark implants during a 5‐years' period. Patients were allocated to the IMZ group (</:t><:t>=29) or the Brånemark group (</:t><:t>=32) by a computerized balancing method. In the IMZ group 4 implants were lost during the 5‐years' follow‐up (survival rate: 93%). In the Brånemark group 9 implants were lost (survival rate: 86%). All patients were re‐operated successfully. Multiple prosthetic revisions were necessary in both groups, especially the precision attachment system in the overdenture was subject to frequent fracture or loosening. From this study can be concluded that there is no difference in clinical state, radiographical state, survival rate and clinical implant performance between the IMZ implant system and the Brånemark implant system supporting an overdenture on 2 implants after 5 years of follow‐up.</:t></p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implants</term><term xml:id="k2">overdenture</term><term xml:id="k3">clinical aspects</term><term xml:id="k4">aftercare</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Article</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change>undefined</change><change>[object Object]</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6DC28571D237D405C619367AC2A679A1D333D3B5/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10005"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2000.11.issue-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="11">11</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2000-10">October 2000</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0044100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005441.x</doi><idGroup><id type="supplier" value="clr9o543"></id><id type="unit" value="CLR11005441"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Article</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2001-12-25"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2001-12-25"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="441">441</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="447">447</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr H. J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
Tel.: 31 (0) 50 3612167
Fax: 31 (0) 50 3611136
</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR11005441.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 23 August 1999</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="0"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5363"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A controlled clinical trial of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures; five‐years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants</title><title type="shortAuthors">Meijer et al.</title><title type="short">IMZ implants versus Brånemark implants</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Henny J. A.</givenNames><familyName>Meijer</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Gerry M.</givenNames><familyName>Raghoebar</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Martin A.</givenNames><familyNamePrefix>Van 't </familyNamePrefix><familyName>
Hof
</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Anita</givenNames><familyName>Visser</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Mariëlle E.</givenNames><familyName>Geertman</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Robert P.</givenNames><familyNamePrefix>Van </familyNamePrefix><familyName>
Oort
</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="NL"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">overdenture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">clinical aspects</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">aftercare</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate a set of clinical items and prosthetic aftercare of edentulous patients with a mandibular overdenture retained by 2 IMZ implants or 2 Brånemark implants during a 5‐years' period. Patients were allocated to the IMZ group (<i>n</i>=29) or the Brånemark group (<i>n</i>=32) by a computerized balancing method. In the IMZ group 4 implants were lost during the 5‐years' follow‐up (survival rate: 93%). In the Brånemark group 9 implants were lost (survival rate: 86%). All patients were re‐operated successfully. Multiple prosthetic revisions were necessary in both groups, especially the precision attachment system in the overdenture was subject to frequent fracture or loosening. From this study can be concluded that there is no difference in clinical state, radiographical state, survival rate and clinical implant performance between the IMZ implant system and the Brånemark implant system supporting an overdenture on 2 implants after 5 years of follow‐up.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A controlled clinical trial of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures; five‐years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>IMZ implants versus Brånemark implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A controlled clinical trial of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures; five‐years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Henny J. A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Meijer</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gerry M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Raghoebar</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Martin A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Van 't Hof</namePart><affiliation>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Anita</namePart><namePart type="family">Visser</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mariëlle E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Geertman</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Robert P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Oort</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-10</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 23 August 1999</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">0</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">0</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">5363</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate a set of clinical items and prosthetic aftercare of edentulous patients with a mandibular overdenture retained by 2 IMZ implants or 2 Brånemark implants during a 5‐years' period. Patients were allocated to the IMZ group (n=29) or the Brånemark group (n=32) by a computerized balancing method. In the IMZ group 4 implants were lost during the 5‐years' follow‐up (survival rate: 93%). In the Brånemark group 9 implants were lost (survival rate: 86%). All patients were re‐operated successfully. Multiple prosthetic revisions were necessary in both groups, especially the precision attachment system in the overdenture was subject to frequent fracture or loosening. From this study can be concluded that there is no difference in clinical state, radiographical state, survival rate and clinical implant performance between the IMZ implant system and the Brånemark implant system supporting an overdenture on 2 implants after 5 years of follow‐up.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implants</topic><topic>overdenture</topic><topic>clinical aspects</topic><topic>aftercare</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>11</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>441</start><end>447</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">6DC28571D237D405C619367AC2A679A1D333D3B5</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-FFG6ZP5P-C</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005441.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">clr9o543</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6DC28571D237D405C619367AC2A679A1D333D3B5/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003627 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003627 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:6DC28571D237D405C619367AC2A679A1D333D3B5
|texte= A controlled clinical trial of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures; five‐years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |