The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial
Identifieur interne : 003587 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003586; suivant : 003588The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial
Auteurs : Wah Ching Tan ; Niklaus P. Lang ; K. Schmidlin ; Marcel Zwahlen ; Bjarni E. PjeturssonSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2011-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar crest, Baseline, Biological width, Bone levels, Buser, Clinical periodontology, Clinical trial, Control implants, Crestal, Crestal bone level, Crestal bone levels, Crestal bone resorption, Digitized, Frequency analysis, Gger, Hard tissue healing, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant installation, Implant placement, Implant placement table, Implant shoulder, Implants research, John wiley sons, Lang, Neck portion, Oral impl, Periodontology, Pocket depth, Present study, Radiograph, Radiographic, Resorption, Same depth, Standardized digitized radiographs, Straumann, Test implants, Vertical depth.
- Teeft :
- Alveolar crest, Baseline, Biological width, Bone levels, Buser, Clinical periodontology, Clinical trial, Control implants, Crestal, Crestal bone level, Crestal bone levels, Crestal bone resorption, Digitized, Frequency analysis, Gger, Hard tissue healing, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant installation, Implant placement, Implant placement table, Implant shoulder, Implants research, John wiley sons, Lang, Neck portion, Oral impl, Periodontology, Pocket depth, Present study, Radiograph, Radiographic, Resorption, Same depth, Standardized digitized radiographs, Straumann, Test implants, Vertical depth.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the soft and hard tissue healing and remodeling around tissue‐level implants with different neck configurations after at least 1 year of functional loading.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01982.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:6CEB3925AE73BB63D470B79BF569D5EC5132C5DALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial</title><author><name sortKey="Tan, Wah Ching" sort="Tan, Wah Ching" uniqKey="Tan W" first="Wah Ching" last="Tan">Wah Ching Tan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, National Dental Center of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, Niklaus P" sort="Lang, Niklaus P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="Niklaus P." last="Lang">Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmidlin, K" sort="Schmidlin, K" uniqKey="Schmidlin K" first="K." last="Schmidlin">K. Schmidlin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Support Unit, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zwahlen, Marcel" sort="Zwahlen, Marcel" uniqKey="Zwahlen M" first="Marcel" last="Zwahlen">Marcel Zwahlen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Support Unit, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pjetursson, Bjarni E" sort="Pjetursson, Bjarni E" uniqKey="Pjetursson B" first="Bjarni E." last="Pjetursson">Bjarni E. Pjetursson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6CEB3925AE73BB63D470B79BF569D5EC5132C5DA</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01982.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6CEB3925AE73BB63D470B79BF569D5EC5132C5DA/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003587</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003587</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial</title><author><name sortKey="Tan, Wah Ching" sort="Tan, Wah Ching" uniqKey="Tan W" first="Wah Ching" last="Tan">Wah Ching Tan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, National Dental Center of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, Niklaus P" sort="Lang, Niklaus P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="Niklaus P." last="Lang">Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmidlin, K" sort="Schmidlin, K" uniqKey="Schmidlin K" first="K." last="Schmidlin">K. Schmidlin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Support Unit, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zwahlen, Marcel" sort="Zwahlen, Marcel" uniqKey="Zwahlen M" first="Marcel" last="Zwahlen">Marcel Zwahlen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Support Unit, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pjetursson, Bjarni E" sort="Pjetursson, Bjarni E" uniqKey="Pjetursson B" first="Bjarni E." last="Pjetursson">Bjarni E. Pjetursson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">22</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="14">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="19">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-01">2011-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar crest</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Biological width</term><term>Bone levels</term><term>Buser</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Control implants</term><term>Crestal</term><term>Crestal bone level</term><term>Crestal bone levels</term><term>Crestal bone resorption</term><term>Digitized</term><term>Frequency analysis</term><term>Gger</term><term>Hard tissue healing</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant placement table</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implants research</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Lang</term><term>Neck portion</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Present study</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Same depth</term><term>Standardized digitized radiographs</term><term>Straumann</term><term>Test implants</term><term>Vertical depth</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar crest</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Biological width</term><term>Bone levels</term><term>Buser</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Control implants</term><term>Crestal</term><term>Crestal bone level</term><term>Crestal bone levels</term><term>Crestal bone resorption</term><term>Digitized</term><term>Frequency analysis</term><term>Gger</term><term>Hard tissue healing</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant placement table</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implants research</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Lang</term><term>Neck portion</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Present study</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Same depth</term><term>Standardized digitized radiographs</term><term>Straumann</term><term>Test implants</term><term>Vertical depth</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objective: To compare the soft and hard tissue healing and remodeling around tissue‐level implants with different neck configurations after at least 1 year of functional loading.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>crestal</json:string><json:string>crestal bone levels</json:string><json:string>control implants</json:string><json:string>implant shoulder</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>straumann</json:string><json:string>test implants</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>biological width</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>implant installation</json:string><json:string>resorption</json:string><json:string>gger</json:string><json:string>buser</json:string><json:string>digitized</json:string><json:string>frequency analysis</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>crestal bone level</json:string><json:string>crestal bone resorption</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>neck portion</json:string><json:string>vertical depth</json:string><json:string>lang</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>alveolar crest</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>implant insertion</json:string><json:string>pocket depth</json:string><json:string>standardized digitized radiographs</json:string><json:string>implant placement table</json:string><json:string>same depth</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>bone levels</json:string><json:string>hard tissue healing</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Wah Ching Tan</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry, National Dental Center of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliations><json:string>Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>K. Schmidlin</name><affiliations><json:string>Research Support Unit, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marcel Zwahlen</name><affiliations><json:string>Research Support Unit, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Bjarni E. Pjetursson</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>clinical outcomes</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>marginal bone levels</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>randomized‐controlled clinical trial</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Standard Plus ® implants</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1982</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-LNSK10WZ-L</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objective: To compare the soft and hard tissue healing and remodeling around tissue‐level implants with different neck configurations after at least 1 year of functional loading.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.224</score><pdfWordCount>3912</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>24717</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>26</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>178</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial</title><pmid><json:string>21091792</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>14</first><last>19</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2011</json:string><json:string>2006</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>Matrox Electronic Systems</json:string><json:string>ITI Foundation</json:string><json:string>Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China K</json:string><json:string>Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland Corresponding</json:string><json:string>University of Berne</json:string><json:string>MAS Department of Reconstructive Dentistry Faculty of Odontology University of Iceland Vatnsmyrarvegur</json:string><json:string>University of Berne, Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Reykjavik Iceland Tel</json:string><json:string>Research Support Unit, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine</json:string><json:string>Switzerland Bjarni E</json:string><json:string>Clinical Research Foundation</json:string><json:string>CRF</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder><json:string>Clinical Research Foundation</json:string><json:string>CRF</json:string></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Marcel Zwahlen</json:string><json:string>Philip Dental</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Stefan Imwinkelried</json:string><json:string>Anita Wehrle</json:string><json:string>E. Pjetursson</json:string><json:string>Andrea Albert</json:string><json:string>Rylev Agerbaek</json:string><json:string>Caroline Fischer</json:string><json:string>W. C. Tan</json:string><json:string>B. Braun</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Japan</json:string><json:string>Tokyo</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Berglundh et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Hess et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Heitz et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Abrahamsson et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Berglundh & Lindhe 1996</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Gerber et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Gargiulo et al. 1961</json:string><json:string>Tan et al</json:string><json:string>Weber et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Abrahamsson et al. 1998</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-LNSK10WZ-L</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01982.x</json:string></doi><id>6CEB3925AE73BB63D470B79BF569D5EC5132C5DA</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6CEB3925AE73BB63D470B79BF569D5EC5132C5DA/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6CEB3925AE73BB63D470B79BF569D5EC5132C5DA/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/6CEB3925AE73BB63D470B79BF569D5EC5132C5DA/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2011-01"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial</title><title level="a" type="short">Vertical depth of implant placement</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Wah Ching</forename><surname>Tan</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, National Dental Center of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore<address><country key="SG"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Niklaus P.</forename><surname>Lang</surname></persName><affiliation>Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">K.</forename><surname>Schmidlin</surname></persName><affiliation>Research Support Unit, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Marcel</forename><surname>Zwahlen</surname></persName><affiliation>Research Support Unit, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Bjarni E.</forename><surname>Pjetursson</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland<address><country key="IS"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">6CEB3925AE73BB63D470B79BF569D5EC5132C5DA</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-LNSK10WZ-L</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01982.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1982</idno><idno type="supplier">1982</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1982.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2010.22.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">22</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="14">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="19">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-01"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objective: </hi> To compare the soft and hard tissue healing and remodeling around tissue‐level implants with different neck configurations after at least 1 year of functional loading.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi> Eighteen patients with multiple missing teeth in the posterior area received two implants inserted in the same sextant. One test (T) implant with a 1.8 mm turned neck and one control (C) implant with a 2.8 mm turned neck were randomly assigned. All implants were placed transmucosally to the same sink depth of approximately 1.8 mm. Peri‐apical radiographs were obtained using the paralleling technique and digitized. Two investigators blinded to the implant type‐evaluated soft and hard tissue conditions at baseline, 6 months and 1 year after loading.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> The mean crestal bone levels and soft tissue parameters were not significantly different between T and C implants at all time points. However, T implants displayed significantly less crestal bone loss than C implants after 1 year. Moreover, a frequency analysis revealed a higher percentage (50%) of T implants with crestal bone levels 1–2 mm below the implant shoulder compared with C implants (5.6%) 1 year after loading.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> Implants with a reduced height turned neck of 1.8 mm may, indeed, lower the crestal bone resorption and hence, may maintain higher crestal bone levels than do implants with a 2.8 mm turned neck, when sunk to the same depth. Moreover, several factors other than the vertical positioning of the moderately rough SLA surface may influence crestal bone levels after 1 year of function.</p><p>
<hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
Tan WC, Lang NP, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl</hi>. Res. <hi rend="bold">22</hi>, 2011; 14–19.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01982.x</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">clinical outcomes</term><term xml:id="k2">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k3">marginal bone levels</term><term xml:id="k4">randomized‐controlled clinical trial</term><term xml:id="k5">Standard Plus <hi rend="superscript">®</hi> implants</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6CEB3925AE73BB63D470B79BF569D5EC5132C5DA/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2010.22.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="22">22</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-01">January 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01982.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1982"></id><id type="supplier" value="1982"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.4 mode:FullText" date="2010-12-15"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-11-22"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-11-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-12-16"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="19">19</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
<i>Bjarni E. Pjetursson</i>
DDS, Dr med. dent. MAS
Department of Reconstructive Dentistry
Faculty of Odontology
University of Iceland
Vatnsmyrarvegur 16
IS‐101 Reykjavik
Iceland
Tel.:+354 525 4850
Fax:+354 525 4874
e‐mail: <email normalForm="bep@hi.is">bep@hi.is</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1982.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 22 April 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="5"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="17"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5134"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="27"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial</title><title type="shortAuthors">Tan et al.</title><title type="short">Vertical depth of implant placement</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Wah Ching</givenNames><familyName>Tan</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Niklaus P.</givenNames><familyName>Lang</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>K.</givenNames><familyName>Schmidlin</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Marcel</givenNames><familyName>Zwahlen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Bjarni E.</givenNames><familyName>Pjetursson</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SG"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, National Dental Center of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>Research Support Unit, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="IS"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">clinical outcomes</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">marginal bone levels</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">randomized‐controlled clinical trial</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">Standard Plus <sup>®</sup> implants</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objective: </b> To compare the soft and hard tissue healing and remodeling around tissue‐level implants with different neck configurations after at least 1 year of functional loading.</p><p><b>Material and methods: </b> Eighteen patients with multiple missing teeth in the posterior area received two implants inserted in the same sextant. One test (T) implant with a 1.8 mm turned neck and one control (C) implant with a 2.8 mm turned neck were randomly assigned. All implants were placed transmucosally to the same sink depth of approximately 1.8 mm. Peri‐apical radiographs were obtained using the paralleling technique and digitized. Two investigators blinded to the implant type‐evaluated soft and hard tissue conditions at baseline, 6 months and 1 year after loading.</p><p><b>Results: </b> The mean crestal bone levels and soft tissue parameters were not significantly different between T and C implants at all time points. However, T implants displayed significantly less crestal bone loss than C implants after 1 year. Moreover, a frequency analysis revealed a higher percentage (50%) of T implants with crestal bone levels 1–2 mm below the implant shoulder compared with C implants (5.6%) 1 year after loading.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> Implants with a reduced height turned neck of 1.8 mm may, indeed, lower the crestal bone resorption and hence, may maintain higher crestal bone levels than do implants with a 2.8 mm turned neck, when sunk to the same depth. Moreover, several factors other than the vertical positioning of the moderately rough SLA surface may influence crestal bone levels after 1 year of function.</p><p> <b>To cite this article:</b>
Tan WC, Lang NP, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl</i>. Res. <b>22</b>, 2011; 14–19.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01982.x</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Vertical depth of implant placement</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Wah Ching</namePart><namePart type="family">Tan</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, National Dental Center of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Niklaus P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lang</namePart><affiliation>Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">K.</namePart><namePart type="family">Schmidlin</namePart><affiliation>Research Support Unit, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marcel</namePart><namePart type="family">Zwahlen</namePart><affiliation>Research Support Unit, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Bjarni E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Pjetursson</namePart><affiliation>Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-01</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 22 April 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">5</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">17</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">27</extent><extent unit="words">5134</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objective: To compare the soft and hard tissue healing and remodeling around tissue‐level implants with different neck configurations after at least 1 year of functional loading.</abstract><abstract>Material and methods: Eighteen patients with multiple missing teeth in the posterior area received two implants inserted in the same sextant. One test (T) implant with a 1.8 mm turned neck and one control (C) implant with a 2.8 mm turned neck were randomly assigned. All implants were placed transmucosally to the same sink depth of approximately 1.8 mm. Peri‐apical radiographs were obtained using the paralleling technique and digitized. Two investigators blinded to the implant type‐evaluated soft and hard tissue conditions at baseline, 6 months and 1 year after loading.</abstract><abstract>Results: The mean crestal bone levels and soft tissue parameters were not significantly different between T and C implants at all time points. However, T implants displayed significantly less crestal bone loss than C implants after 1 year. Moreover, a frequency analysis revealed a higher percentage (50%) of T implants with crestal bone levels 1–2 mm below the implant shoulder compared with C implants (5.6%) 1 year after loading.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: Implants with a reduced height turned neck of 1.8 mm may, indeed, lower the crestal bone resorption and hence, may maintain higher crestal bone levels than do implants with a 2.8 mm turned neck, when sunk to the same depth. Moreover, several factors other than the vertical positioning of the moderately rough SLA surface may influence crestal bone levels after 1 year of function.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Tan WC, Lang NP, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 14–19.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01982.x</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>clinical outcomes</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>marginal bone levels</topic><topic>randomized‐controlled clinical trial</topic><topic>Standard Plus ® implants</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>22</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>14</start><end>19</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">6CEB3925AE73BB63D470B79BF569D5EC5132C5DA</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-LNSK10WZ-L</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01982.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1982</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6CEB3925AE73BB63D470B79BF569D5EC5132C5DA/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003587 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003587 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:6CEB3925AE73BB63D470B79BF569D5EC5132C5DA
|texte= The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized‐controlled clinical trial
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |